Next Article in Journal
RNAs on the Go: Extracellular Transfer in Insects with Promising Prospects for Pest Management
Next Article in Special Issue
Chemical Characterization of Marrubium vulgare Volatiles from Serbia
Previous Article in Journal
Anthropogenic Pressure on Tree Species Diversity, Composition, and Growth of Balanites aegyptiaca in Dinder Biosphere Reserve, Sudan
Previous Article in Special Issue
Validation of Qualitative Broth Volatilization Checkerboard Method for Testing of Essential Oils: Dual-Column GC–FID/MS Analysis and In Vitro Combinatory Antimicrobial Effect of Origanum vulgare and Thymus vulgaris against Staphylococcus aureus in Liquid and Vapor Phases
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Volatile Phytochemistry of Monarda Species Growing in South Alabama

1
Kirkland Gardens, P.O. Box 176, Newville, AL 36353, USA
2
Aromatic Plant Research Center, 230 N 1200 E, Suite 100, Lehi, UT 84043, USA
3
Department of Chemistry, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL 35899, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 9 February 2021 / Revised: 25 February 2021 / Accepted: 26 February 2021 / Published: 4 March 2021

Abstract

:
The genus Monarda (family Lamiaceae) contains 22 species of which three are native to southern Alabama, M. citriodora, M. fistulosa, and M. punctata. Several species of Monarda have been used in traditional medicines of Native Americans, and this present study is part of an ongoing project to add to our understanding of Native American pharmacopeia. Plant material from M. citriodora, M. fistulosa, and M. punctata was collected in south Alabama and the essential oils obtained by hydrodistillation. The essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatographic techniques to determine the chemical compositions as well as enantiomeric distributions. The compounds thymol, carvacrol, p-cymene, and their derivatives were the primary terpenoid components found in the essential oils. The known biological activities of these compounds are consistent with the traditional uses of Monarda species to treat wounds, skin infections, colds, and fevers.

1. Introduction

The Plant List [1] shows 22 different Monarda L. (Lamiaceae) species, 18 of which occur in the United States [2]. There are three Monarda species native to south Alabama, namely Monarda citriodora Cerv. ex Lag., Monarda fistulosa L., and Monarda punctata L. (see Figure 1) [2].
Several Monarda species have been used by Native Americans as medicinal plants [3]. For example, M. fistulosa was used by the Blackfoot, Navajo, Lakota, and Winnebago people to treat boils, cuts and wounds; the Cherokee, Chippewa, Flathead, Ojibwa, and Tewa used the plant to treat colds, fever, and influenza; the Crow, Lakota, Menominee, and Ojibwa used the plant for coughs, catarrh, and other respiratory problems. Monarda punctata was used by the Delaware, Mohegan Nanticoke, and Navajo tribes to treat colds, fever coughs, and catarrh.
Both M. citriodora and M. fistulosa are popular ornamentals and have been introduced to temperate locations around the world [4,5,6]. Geographical location likely plays an important role in the phytochemistry of Monarda species. To our knowledge, however, there have been no previous examinations of M. citriodora, M. fistulosa, or M. punctata growing in their native range of south Alabama. In this work, we have examined the chemical compositions and enantiomeric distributions of essential oils of the three Monarda species from south Alabama.

2. Results

2.1. Monarda Citriodora

The M. citriodora essential oils were obtained as clear orange oils. The essential oil yields for M. citriodora aerial parts essential oil were 1.59% and 1.79% for samples #1 and #2, respectively, while the root essential oil was obtained in 0.879% yield. The chemical compositions of the essential oils from the aerial parts and the roots of M. citriodora cultivated in south Alabama are summarized in Table 1. The essential oils were dominated by the phenolic monoterpenoids thymol (RIdb = 1289) and carvacrol (RIdb = 1296). The other major components were p-cymene (RIdb = 1024) and thymol methyl ether (RIdb = 1239).
Chiral gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis of the M. citriodora essential oils revealed the (+)-enantiomers to be the major stereoisomers for α-thujene, α-pinene, β-pinene, α-phellandrene, δ-3-carene, α-terpinene, cis-sabinene hydrate, trans-sabinene hydrate, α-terpineol, α-copaene, (E)-β-caryophyllene, and germacrene D. On the other hand, the (−)-enantiomer was dominant for β-phellandrene, borneol, carvone, and δ-cadinene. Limonene showed variation in the enantiomeric distributions with (+)-limonene in 26.7%, 63.3%, and 57.3% for aerial parts #1, #2, and roots essential oils, respectively. Likewise, linalool also showed variation with (+)-linalool of 71.9%, 49.7%, and 50.1%. (+)-Terpinen-4-ol was the predominant enantiomer in the aerial parts essential oils (60.2% and 58.5%), but (−)-terpinen-4-ol (79.1%) was dominant in the root essential oil.

2.2. Monarda Fistulosa

Monarda fistulosa essential oils were obtained in 2.66–4.83% yields as bright orange oils. The chemical compositions of the essential oils from the aerial parts of M. fistulosa are summarized in Table 2. In samples #1 and #2, thymol (RIdb = 1289) dominated the compositions (54.3% and 62.2%, respectively) with lesser quantities of p-cymene (RIdb = 1024, 12.1% and 10.2%), limonene (RIdb = 1030, 6.1% and 3.7%), carvacrol (RIdb = 1296, 5.9% and 6.6%), and thymoquinone (RIdb = 1252, 8.4% and 2.3%). Curiously, sample #3, although qualitatively similar, had a very different quantitative composition with thymoquinone as the most abundant constituent (41.3%) followed by p-cymene (21.9%), but with lower concentrations of thymol (8.9%) and carvacrol (1.6%).
As was observed in M. citriodora essential oils, in M. fistulosa essential oils, the (+)-enantiomer was the major for α-thujene, α-pinene, β-pinene, α-phellandrene, δ-3-carene, α-terpinene, cis-sabinene hydrate, trans-sabinene hydrate, α-terpineol, α-copaene, (E)-β-caryophyllene, and germacrene D, while the (−)-enantiomer was predominant for β-phellandrene and borneol. (−)-Limonene (97.4–99.5%) and (−)-linalool (62.1–62.5%) dominated in all three M. fistulosa samples. (+)-Camphene (100%), (+)-sabinene (58.4–59.0%), and (+)-terpinen-4-ol (63.2–63.3%) were also dominant.

2.3. Monarda Punctata

Hydrodistillation of two samples of wild-growing M. punctata aerial parts gave bright orange essential oils in 0.781% and 0.658% yield. The most abundant components in the essential oils were thymol (RIdb = 1289, 61.8% and 47.9%), p-cymene (RIdb = 1024, 15.3% and 19.8%), γ-terpinene (RIdb = 1057, 2.7% and 9.7%), and carvacrol (RIdb = 1296, 4.5% and 4.1%) (see Table 3).
The enantiomeric distributions of terpenoids in M. punctata essential oils were analogous to those observed for M. citriodora and M. fistulosa oils with the exception of limonene, which was virtually racemic in sample #1, but 100% (−)-limonene in sample #2.

3. Discussion

Monarda citriodora and M. fistulosa have been introduced throughout temperate regions of the world as popular herbal medicines as well as ornamentals [4,5,6]. The volatile phytochemistry has shown wide variation depending on geographical location (Table 4). The essential oils of M. citriodora in the present study were rich in both thymol and carvacrol, whereas essential oils from Europe and Asia were dominated by thymol with much lower concentrations of carvacrol. Monarda fistulosa, in particular, showed wide variation with at least three different chemotypes (carvacrol-rich, thymol-rich, and geraniol-rich, see Table 4). The essential oils of M. fistulosa (samples #1 and #2) in this study fit into the thymol-rich chemotype. Interestingly, there was a high concentration of thymoquinone in M. fistulosa sample #3, with concomitant lower concentrations of thymol and carvacrol. Thymol was reported as the major component of M. punctata in two old reports [11,12]. Consistent with these reports, a floral essential oil of M. punctata from China was rich in thymol (75.2%), which is in agreement with the aerial parts essential oils from Alabama.
The high concentrations of thymol, carvacrol, and p-cymene are consistent with the traditional uses of Monarda spp. to treat skin infections, wounds, fevers, and respiratory problems. Thymol [31], carvacrol [32], and p-cymene [33] have demonstrated antibacterial and antifungal activities [34,35], as well as wound-healing activity [36]. Thymol [37] and carvacrol [38], in addition to thymoquinone [39], have shown antitussive effects. Thymoquinone has also shown wound-healing properties [40]. Furthermore, both thymol [41] and carvacrol [32] have shown analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities [42].
As far as we are aware, this work presents the first chiral analysis of terpenoid constituents of Monarda species. Several investigations on the enantiomeric distributions in other members of the Lamiaceae have been reported in the literature, however. There seems to be much variation in the enantiomeric distribution of monoterpenoids across the family. Consistent with what was observed in Monarda essential oils, (+)-α-pinene was the major enantiomer found in Coridothymus capitatus [43], Rosmarinus officinalis [44], Lepechinia heteromorpha [45], Ocimum canum, and Ocimum kilimandscharicum [46]. Likewise, (+)-β-pinene predominates over (−)-β-pinene in C. capitatus [43] as well as the Monarda essential oils. On the other hand, (−)-β-pinene dominates in R. officinalis [44] and Lepechinia mutica [47]. The essential oils of peppermint (Mentha × piperita) and spearmint (Mentha spicata) have shown nearly racemic mixtures of α- and β-pinenes [48]. (+)-α-Phellandrene and (−)-β-phellandrene were the dominant enantiomers in the Monarda essential oils. In marked contrast, however, (−)-α-phellandrene and (+)-β-phellandrene predominated in L. mutica essential oil [47]. (−)-Limonene predominates in M. fistulosa essential oil, peppermint (M. piperita) and spearmint (M. spicata) essential oils [48] whereas (+)-limonene is the major enantiomer in C. capitatus [43], O. canum, and O. kilimandscharicum [46], and a nearly racemic mixture was found in rosemary (R. officinalis) essential oil [44]. (+)-Linalool was the predominant enantiomer in C. capitatus [43], Salvia schimperi [49], Pycnanthemum incanum [50], O. canum, and O. kilimandscharicum [46], whereas (−)-linalool was the major stereoisomer in Lavandula angustifolia [51] and R. officinalis [44].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Monarda citriodora was cultivated in Kirkland Gardens, Newville, AL, USA (31°26′27″ N, 85°21′31″ W) from seeds (Outsidepride Seed Source, Independence, OR, USA). The cultivated Monarda spp. were grown in loamy clayey-sand and fertilized with chicken manure, kelp meal, and bone meal at planting in full sun. The aerial parts of M. citriodora were collected from separate plants on separate occasions (plant #1, collected on 20 June 2020; plant #2 collected on 1 August 2020). The roots of M. citriodora were obtained from plant #2.
Monarda fistulosa was cultivated in Kirkland Gardens, Newville, AL, USA (31°26′27″ N, 85°21′31″ W) from seedlings (Home Depot, Dothan, AL, USA) as above. The aerial parts of three different plant samples were collected on 25 June 2020.
Monarda punctata was collected from wild-growing plants near Newville, AL, USA (31°27′23″ N, 85°22′17″ W); the edge of a planted pine forest, disturbed grassland, full/partial sun, sandy-clay soil that had been intentionally burned (prescribed burn) 1.5 years before collection. The aerial parts of two different plants were collected on 1 June 2020.
Plants were identified by S.K. Lawson and a voucher specimen of each plant was deposited in the University of Alabama in Huntsville Herbarium (HALA); voucher numbers for M. citriodora (SKL61820), M. fistulosa (SKL72020), and M. punctata (SKL9620). The Monarda plant materials were allowed to dry in the shade for several days, the air-dried plant materials were pulverized and subjected to hydrodistillation using a Likens-Nickerson apparatus with continuous extraction with dichloromethane (Table 5).

4.2. Gas Chromatographic Analysis

The essential oils were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC-MS), gas chromatography with flame ionization detection (GC-FID), and chiral GC-MS as previously reported [52].

4.2.1. Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010 Ultra, ZB-5ms GC column, GC oven temperature 50 °C–260 °C (2 °C/min), 1-μL injection of 5% solution of EO in dichloromethane (split mode, 30:1). Retention indices (RIs) were determined with reference to a homologous series of n-alkanes. Compounds identified by comparison of the MS fragmentation and retention indices with those in the databases [7,8,9,10].

4.2.2. Gas Chromatography–Flame Ionization Detection

Shimadzu GC 2010, FID detector, ZB-5 GC column, GC oven temperature 50 °C–260 °C (2.0 °C/min). The percent compositions were determined from raw peak areas without standardization.

4.2.3. Chiral Gas Chromatography–Mass Spectrometry

Shimadzu GCMS-QP2010S, Restek B-Dex 325 column, GC oven temperature 50 °C–120 °C (1.5 °C/min) then 120 °C–200 °C (2.0 °C/min), 0.1 μL injection of 5% solution of EO in dichloromethane (split mode, 45:1). The enantiomeric distributions were determined by comparison of retention times with authentic samples obtained from Sigma-Aldrich (Milwaukee, WI, USA). Relative enantiomer percentages were calculated from peak areas.

5. Conclusions

This study presents, for the first time, analyses of the essential oils of three species of Monarda growing in south Alabama. In addition, the enantiomeric distribution of terpenoids was also carried out. This work illustrates the wide variation in essential oil compositions based on geographical location as well as variations in enantiomeric distribution. It would be interesting to compare enantiomeric distributions for Monarda essential oils from other geographical locations and for other Monarda species. Nevertheless, the phenolic monoterpenoids thymol and/or carvacrol were found to dominate the compositions of M. citriodora, M. fistulosa, and M. punctata and support the traditional medicinal uses of these plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.K.L. and W.N.S.; methodology, S.K.L., P.S., and W.N.S.; software, P.S.; validation, W.N.S., formal analysis, P.S. and W.N.S.; investigation, S.K.L., P.S., and W.N.S.; data curation, W.N.S.; writing—original draft preparation, W.N.S.; writing—review and editing, S.K.L., P.S., and W.N.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

P.S. and W.N.S. participated in this work as part of the activities of the Aromatic Plant Research Center (APRC, https://aromaticplant.org/, accessed on 9 February 2021).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Royal Botanic Gardens, K. The Plant List. Available online: http://www.theplantlist.org/tpl1.1/search?q=Monarda (accessed on 1 February 2021).
  2. Kartesz, J.T. BONAP’s North American Plant Atlas. Available online: http://bonap.net/Napa/TaxonMaps/Genus/County/Monarda (accessed on 1 February 2021).
  3. Moerman, D.E. Native American Ethnobotany; Timber Press, Inc.: Portland, OR, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  4. Davidson, C.G. Monarda, Bee-balm. In Flower Breeding and Genetics; Anderson, N.O., Ed.; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2007; pp. 756–779. ISBN 978-1-4020-4427-4. [Google Scholar]
  5. Ciuruşniuc, A.-M.; Robu, T. Study of the behaviour of cultivated species of the genus Monarda L. in Vaslui County, to introduce them in cultivation as medicinal, aromatic and decorative plants. Lucr. Științifice Ser. Agron. 2012, 55, 309–312. [Google Scholar]
  6. Dudchenko, V.V.; Svydenko, L.V.; Markovska, O.Y.; Sydiakina, O.V. Morphobiological and biochemical characteristics of Monarda L. varieties under conditions of the southern steppe of Ukraine. J. Ecol. Eng. 2020, 21, 99–107. [Google Scholar]
  7. Adams, R.P. Identification of Essential Oil Components by Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry, 4th ed.; Allured Publishing: Carol Stream, IL, USA, 2007; ISBN 978-1-932633-21-4. [Google Scholar]
  8. Mondello, L. FFNSC 3; Shimadzu Scientific Instruments: Columbia, MD, USA, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  9. NIST. NIST17; National Institute of Standards and Technology: Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2017.
  10. Satyal, P. Development of GC-MS Database of Essential Oil Components by the Analysis of Natural Essential Oils and Synthetic Compounds and Discovery of Biologically Active Novel Chemotypes in Essential Oils. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Alabama in Huntsville, Huntsville, AL, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  11. Schroeter, H.J. Analysis of the volatile oil of Monarda punctata, Linne. Am. J. Pharm. 1888, 1888, 113. [Google Scholar]
  12. Schumann, W.R.; Kremers, E. On the chemical composition of the oil from Monarda punctata, L. Am. J. Pharm. 1896, 1896, 469. [Google Scholar]
  13. Pathania, A.S.; Guru, S.K.; Verma, M.K.; Sharma, C.; Abdullah, S.T.; Malik, F.; Chandra, S.; Katoch, M.; Bhushan, S. Disruption of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling cascade and induction of apoptosis in HL-60 cells by an essential oil from Monarda citriodora. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2013, 62, 246–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Di Vito, M.; Bellardi, M.G.; Mondello, F.; Modesto, M.; Michelozzi, M.; Bugli, F.; Sanguinetti, M.; Sclocchi, M.C.; Sebastiani, M.L.; Biffi, S.; et al. Monarda citriodora hydrolate vs. essential oil comparison in several anti-microbial applications. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 128, 206–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Deepika; Singh, A.; Chaudhari, A.K.; Das, S.; Dubey, N.K. Nanoencapsulated Monarda citriodora Cerv. ex Lag. essential oil as potential antifungal and antiaflatoxigenic agent against deterioration of stored functional foods. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 57, 2863–2876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Collins, J.E.; Bishop, C.D.; Deans, S.G.; Svoboda, K.P. Composition of the essential oil from the leaves and flowers of Monarda citriodora var. citriodora grown in the United Kingdom. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1994, 6, 27–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bishop, C.D.; Thornton, I.B. Evaluation of the antifungal activity of the essential oils of Monarda citriodora var. citriodora and Melaleuca alternifolia on post-harvest pathogens. J. Essent. Oil Res. 1997, 9, 77–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Dorman, H.J.D.; Deans, S.G. Chemical composition, antimicrobial and in vitro antioxidant properties of Monarda citriodora var. citriodora, Myristica fragrans, Origanum vulgare ssp. hirtum, Pelargonium sp. and Thymus zygis oils. J. Essent. Oil Res. 2004, 16, 145–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zamureenko, V.A.; Klyuev, N.A.; Bocharov, B.V.; Kabanov, V.S.; Zacharov, A.M. An investigation of the component composition of the essential oil of Monarda fistulosa. Chem. Nat. Compd. 1989, 25, 549–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Contaldo, N.; Bellardi, M.G.; Cavicchi, L.; Epifano, F.; Genovese, S.; Curini, M.; Bertaccini, A. Phytochemical effects of phytoplasma infections on essential oil of Monarda fistulosa L. Bull. Insectology 2011, 64, S177–S178. [Google Scholar]
  21. Adebayo, O.; Bélanger, A.; Khanizadeh, S. Variable inhibitory activities of essential oils of three Monarda species on the growth of Botrytis cinerea. Can. J. Plant Sci. 2013, 93, 987–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tabanca, N.; Bernier, U.R.; Ali, A.; Wang, M.; Demirci, B.; Blythe, E.K.; Khan, S.I.; Baser, K.H.C.; Khan, I.A. Bioassay-guided investigation of two Monarda essential oils as repellents of yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2013, 61, 8573–8580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Francati, S.; Gualandi, G. Side effects of essential oils of Monarda fistulosa L. and M. didyma L. on the tachinid parasitoid Exorista larvarum (L.): A preliminary study. Tachinid Times 2017, 30, 4–8. [Google Scholar]
  24. Mattarelli, P.; Epifano, F.; Minardi, P.; Di Vito, M.; Modesto, M.; Barbanti, L.; Bellardi, M.G. Chemical composition and antimicrobial activity of essential oils from aerial parts of Monarda didyma and Monarda fistulosa cultivated in Italy. J. Essent. Oil-Bear. Plants 2017, 20, 76–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Laquale, S.; Avato, P.; Argentieri, M.P.; Bellardi, M.G.; D’Addabbo, T. Nematotoxic activity of essential oils from Monarda species. J. Pest Sci. 2018, 91, 1115–1125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Colţun, M.B.; Bogdan, A.A. Aspects of the biology and the cultivation of Monarda fistulosa L. as aromatic species in the Republic Of Moldova. Оснoвні, малoпoширені і нетрадиційні види рoслин–від вивчення дo oсвoєння (сільськoгoспoдарські і біoлoгічні науки) 2020, 2020, 103–109. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ghosh, M.; Schepetkin, I.A.; Özek, G.; Özek, T.; Khlebnikov, A.I.; Damron, D.S.; Quinn, M.T. Essential oils from Monarda fistulosa: Chemical composition and activation of transient receptor potential A1 (TRPA1) channels. Molecules 2020, 25, 4873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Malankina, E.L.; Kuzmenko, A.N.; Zaitchik, B.T.; Ruzhitskiy, A.O.; Evgrafov, A.A.; Kozlovskaya, L.N. Content and composition of wild bergamot (Monarda fistulosa L.) essential oil at different phenological phases. Moscow Univ. Chem. Bull. 2020, 75, 391–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Mazza, G.; Chubey, B.B.; Kiehn, F. Essential oil of Monarda fistulosa L. var. menthaefolia, a potential source of geraniol. Flavour Fragr. J. 1987, 2, 129–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, H.; Yang, T.; Li, F.-Y.; Yao, Y.; Sun, Z.-M. Antibacterial activity and mechanism of action of Monarda punctata essential oil and its main components against common bacterial pathogens in respiratory tract. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2014, 7, 7389–7398. [Google Scholar]
  31. Marchese, A.; Orhan, I.E.; Daglia, M.; Barbieri, R.; Di Lorenzo, A.; Nabavi, S.F.; Gortzi, O.; Izadi, M.; Nabavi, S.M. Antibacterial and antifungal activities of thymol: A brief review of the literature. Food Chem. 2016, 210, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Sharifi-Rad, M.; Varoni, E.M.; Iriti, M.; Martorell, M.; Setzer, W.N.; del Mar Contreras, M.; Salehi, B.; Soltani-Nejad, A.; Rajabi, S.; Tajbakhsh, M.; et al. Carvacrol and human health: A comprehensive review. Phyther. Res. 2018, 32, 1675–1687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Marchese, A.; Arciola, C.R.; Barbieri, R.; Silva, A.S.; Nabavi, S.F.; Sokeng, A.J.T.; Izadi, M.; Jafari, N.J.; Suntar, I.; Daglia, M.; et al. Update on monoterpenes as antimicrobial agents: A particular focus on p-cymene. Materials 2017, 10, 947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Memar, M.Y.; Raei, P.; Alizadeh, N.; Aghdam, M.A.; Kafil, H.S. Carvacrol and thymol: Strong antimicrobial agents against resistant isolates. Rev. Med. Microbiol. 2017, 28, 63–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Aljaafari, M.N.; AlAli, A.O.; Baqais, L.; Alqubaisy, M.; AlAli, M.; Aidin, M.; Ong-Abdullah, J.; Abushelaibi, A.; Lai, K.-S.; Lim, S.-H.E. An overview of the potential therapeutic applications of essential oils. Molecules 2021, 26, 628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Costa, M.F.; Durço, A.O.; Rabelo, T.K.; Barreto, R.d.S.S.; Guimarães, A.G. Effects of carvacrol, thymol and essential oils containing such monoterpenes on wound healing: A systematic review. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 71, 141–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Gavliakova, S.; Biringerova, Z.; Buday, T.; Brozmanova, M.; Calkovsky, V.; Poliacek, I.; Plevkova, J. Antitussive effects of nasal thymol challenges in healthy volunteers. Respir. Physiol. Neurobiol. 2013, 187, 104–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Boskabady, M.H.; Jandaghi, P.; Kiani, S.; Hasanzadeh, L. Antitussive effect of Carum copticum in guinea pigs. J. Ethnopharmacol. 2005, 97, 79–82. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Hosseinzadeh, H.; Eskandari, M.; Ziaee, T. Antitussive effect of thymoquinone, a constituent of Nigella sativa seeds, in Guinea pigs. Pharmacologyonline 2008, 2, 480–484. [Google Scholar]
  40. Selçuk, C.T.; Durgun, M.; Tekin, R.; Yolbas, L.; Bozkurt, M.; Akçay, C.; Alabalk, U.; Basarali, M.K. Evaluation of the effect of thymoquinone treatment on wound healing in a rat burn model. J. Burn Care Res. 2013, 34, 274–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Jyoti, D.D.; Singh, D.; Kumar, G.; Karnatak, M.; Chandra, S.; Verma, V.P.; Shankar, R. Thymol chemistry: A medicinal toolbox. Curr. Bioact. Compd. 2018, 15, 454–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fachini-Queiroz, F.C.; Kummer, R.; Estevão-Silva, C.F.; Carvalho, M.D.D.B.; Cunha, J.M.; Grespan, R.; Bersani-Amado, C.A.; Cuman, R.K.N. Effects of thymol and carvacrol, constituents of Thymus vulgaris L. essential oil, on the inflammatory response. Evid. Based Complement. Altern. Med. 2012, 2012, 657026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Tateo, F.; Mariotti, M.; Bononi, M. Essential oil composition and enantiomeric distribution of some monoterpenoid components of Coridothymus capitatus (L.) Rchb. grown on the island of Kos (Greece). J. Essent. Oil Res. 1998, 10, 241–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Satyal, P.; Jones, T.H.; Lopez, E.M.; McFeeters, R.L.; Ali, N.A.A.; Mansi, I.; Al-Kaf, A.G.; Setzer, W.N. Chemotypic characterization and biological activity of Rosmarinus officinalis. Foods 2017, 6, 20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Gilardoni, G.; Ramírez, J.; Montalván, M.; Quinche, W.; León, J.; Benítez, L.; Morocho, V.; Cumbicus, N.; Bicchi, C. Phytochemistry of three Ecuadorian Lamiaceae: Lepechinia heteromorpha (Briq.) Epling, Lepechinia radula (Benth.) Epling and Lepechinia paniculata (Kunth) Epling. Plants 2019, 8, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Pragadheesh, V.S.; Saroj, A.; Yadav, A.; Samad, A.; Chanotiya, C.S. Compositions, enantiomer characterization and antifungal activity of two Ocimum essential oils. Ind. Crops Prod. 2013, 50, 333–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Ramírez, J.; Gilardoni, G.; Ramón, E.; Tosi, S.; Picco, A.M.; Bicchi, C.; Vidari, G. Phytochemical study of the Ecuadorian species Lepechinia mutica (Benth.) Epling and high antifungal activity of carnosol against Pyricularia oryzae. Pharmaceuticals 2018, 11, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Coleman, W.M.; Lawrence, B.M. Examination of the enantiomeric distribution of certain monoterpene hydrocarbons in selected essential oils by automated solid-phase microextraction-chiral gas chromatography-mass selective detection. J. Chromatogr. Sci. 2000, 38, 95–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Endeshaw, M.M.; Gautun, O.R.; Asfaw, N.; Aasen, A.J. Volatile oil constituents of the Ethiopian plant Salvia schimperi Benth. Flavour Fragr. J. 2000, 15, 27–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Dein, M.; Munafo, J.P. Characterization of key odorants in hoary mountain mint, Pycnanthemum incanum. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2019, 67, 2589–2597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Satyal, P.; Pappas, R.S. Antique lavender essential oil from 1945, its chemical composition and enantiomeric distribution. Nat. Volatiles Essent. Oils 2016, 3, 20–25. [Google Scholar]
  52. DeCarlo, A.; Johnson, S.; Okeke-Agulu, K.I.; Dosoky, N.S.; Wax, S.J.; Owolabi, M.S.; Setzer, W.N. Compositional analysis of the essential oil of Boswellia dalzielii frankincense from West Africa reveals two major chemotypes. Phytochemistry 2019, 164, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Monarda species discussed in this work (photographs by S. K. L).
Figure 1. Monarda species discussed in this work (photographs by S. K. L).
Plants 10 00482 g001
Table 1. Essential oil compositions of Monarda citriodora cultivated in south Alabama.
Table 1. Essential oil compositions of Monarda citriodora cultivated in south Alabama.
Aerial Parts Essential OilRoot Essential Oil
RIcalcRIdbCompound#1, %ED, (+):(−)#2, %ED, (+):(−)#2, %ED, (+):(−)
923925α-Thujene1.069.0:31.00.866.6:33.40.564.2:35.8
930932α-Pinene0.384.2:15.80.362.8:37.20.274.5:25.5
947950Camphenetr tr tr
970971Sabinenetr tr ---
975978β-Pinene0.164.5:35.50.1 0.1
9769741-Octen-3-ol0.7 0.7 0.5
9839843-Octanone0.1 0.2 0.3
987989Myrcene0.7 0.4 0.3
9959963-Octanol0.2 0.3 0.3
10021004Octanaltr tr ---
10031004p-Mentha-1(7),8-dienetr --- ---
10051006α-Phellandrene0.195.1:4.90.1100:0tr100:0
10071008δ-3-Carene0.1100:00.1100:00.1100:0
10151017α-Terpinene1.8100:01.1100:00.7100:0
10161022m-Cymenetr tr ---
10231024p-Cymene7.8 6.4 7.2
10271030Limonene0.526.7:73.30.463.3:36.70.357.3:42.7
10281029β-Phellandrene0.20:1000.10:1000.10:100
10301033Benzyl alcohol--- --- 0.4
103010301,8-Cineole0.2 0.3 0.2
10551057γ-Terpinene1.7 0.5 0.2
10671069cis-Sabinene hydrate0.895.3:4.71.089.5:10.50.990.7:9.3
10831086Terpinolenetr tr tr
10841086trans-Linalool oxide (furanoid)--- tr 0.1
10871093p-Cymenene--- --- tr
10981099Linalool0.171.9:28.10.149.7:50.30.350.1:49.9
10991099trans-Sabinene hydratetr76.5:23.50.371.1:28.90.366.8:33.2
11651167exo-Acetoxycamphene--- --- 0.1
11691170Borneol0.10:1000.10:1000.30:100
11781180Terpinen-4-ol0.460.2:39.80.458.5:41.51.920.9:79.1
11831186p-Cymen-8-ol--- --- 0.1
11871190Methyl salicylatetr --- ---
11951195α-Terpineol0.1100:00.1100:00.2100:0
11961197Methyl chavicol (= Estragole)--- 1.5 ---
12361239Thymol methyl ether4.4 5.6 11.3
12521252Thymoquinone0.2 0.7 1.3
12531246Carvonetr39.9:60.1--- ---
12901289Thymol38.2 37.0 29.0
12971296Carvacrol38.3 39.9 38.3
130513094-Vinylguaiacol--- --- 0.1
13061306iso-Ascaridoletr tr ---
13421345Thymyl acetate0.3 0.2 0.3
13471356Eugenoltr --- 0.3
13611365Carvacryl acetate0.8 0.5 1.0
13721375α-Copaenetr100:0tr 0.1100:0
13801382β-Bourbonenetr tr 0.1
13891392(Z)-Jasmonetr tr tr
13981398Cyperene--- --- 0.2
14041408Decyl acetatetr --- ---
14151417(E)-β-Caryophyllene0.3100:00.4100:00.5100:0
14261430β-Copaenetr tr tr
14511453α-Humulenetr tr tr
14571457Rotundene--- --- 0.1
14711475γ-Muurolenetr 0.1 0.1
14731481(E)-β-Ionone--- --- tr
14771480Germacrene D0.1100:00.1100:00.1
14811485γ-Thujaplicintr --- 0.1
14831489β-Selinenetr --- ---
14871490γ-Amorphenetr --- ---
14911497α-Selinenetr tr 0.1
14941497α-Muurolenetr tr tr
15091512γ-Cadinenetr tr 0.1
15141518δ-Cadinene0.1 0.1 0.10:100
15481549Thymohydroquinone0.3 0.1 0.1
15771577Caryophyllene oxidetr 0.1 0.1
16491655α-Cadinol--- --- 0.1
16891691Cyperotundone--- --- 0.2
18351841Phytone--- --- 0.1
Monoterpene hydrocarbons14.3 10.2 9.6
Oxygenated monoterpenoids84.0 86.3 86.0
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons0.5 0.7 1.4
Oxygenated sesquiterpenoidstr 0.1 0.4
Benzenoid aromaticstr 1.5 0.8
Others1.0 1.2 1.2
Total identified99.8 99.8 99.3
RIcalc = Retention indices determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes on a ZB-5ms column. RIdb = Retention indices from the databases [7,8,9,10]. #1 = Plant sample #1. #2 = Plant sample #2. --- = Not observed. ED = Enantiomeric distribution (dextrorotatory enantiomer: levorotatory enantiomer). tr = Trace (< 0.05%).
Table 2. Chemical composition of Monarda fistulosa essential oils cultivated in south Alabama.
Table 2. Chemical composition of Monarda fistulosa essential oils cultivated in south Alabama.
Aerial Parts Essential Oil
RIcalcRIdbCompound#1, %ED, (+):(−)#2, %ED, (+):(−)#3, %ED, (+):(−)
923925α-Thujene1.272.5:27.50.872.8:27.20.971.2:28.8
930932α-Pinene0.559.2:40.80.363.8:36.20.561.0:39.0
947950Camphene0.1100:00.1100:00.2100:0
971971Sabinene0.258.4:41.6tr 0.259.0:41.0
9739731-Octen-3-one--- --- 0.1
975978β-Pinene0.257.3:42.7--- 0.257.9:42.1
9789781-Octen-3-ol3.0 3.3 3.3
9829843-Octanonetr 0.1 0.1
987989Myrcenetr 0.3 0.1
9959963-Octanoltr 0.1 0.1
10041004p-Mentha-1(7),8-dienetr tr tr
10061006α-Phellandrene0.195.5:4.50.295.4:4.60.193.4:6.6
10081008δ-3-Carene0.1100:00.1100:00.1100:0
10161017α-Terpinene2.1100:02.3100:00.8100:0
10191022m-Cymenetr tr 0.1
10241024p-Cymene12.1 10.2 21.9
102510262-Acetyl-3-methylfuran--- --- 0.5
10291030Limonene6.10.5:99.53.72.6:97.46.31.2:98.8
10301031β-Phellandrene0.20:1000.20:1000.20:100
103110301,8-Cineole0.1 0.1 0.1
10561057γ-Terpinenetr 0.1 tr
10691069cis-Sabinene hydrate1.295.8:4.21.396.3:3.72.496.5:3.5
107810791-Nonen-3-ol0.1 0.1 0.1
10841086Terpinolenetr 0.1 tr
10891091p-Cymenenetr tr 0.1
10981099Linalooltr37.8:62.2tr37.5:62.5tr37.9:62.1
10991099trans-Sabinene hydrate0.275.9:24.10.375.0:25.00.575.3:24.7
11031107Nonanaltr --- tr
11151112(E)-2,4-Dimethylhepta-2,4-dienal--- --- 0.2
11211121trans-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-oltr tr 0.3
11231124cis-p-Menth-2-en-1-oltr tr tr
11301132cis-Limonene oxidetr --- 0.1
113311352-Vinylanisole0.1 tr tr
11341137cis-p-Mentha-2,8-dien-1-ol--- --- 0.3
11351138trans-Limonene oxidetr --- ---
11371138trans-Sabinol--- --- tr
11381140trans-Pinocarveol--- --- 0.1
11391141cis-Verbenol--- --- tr
11431145trans-Verbenol--- --- 0.3
11441145Camphor--- --- tr
11601164Pinocarvone--- --- tr
11611162(Z)-iso-Citral--- --- tr
11671168trans-Phellandrene epoxide--- --- 0.1
11701170Borneol0.50:1000.20:1000.70:100
11791180Terpinen-4-ol0.463.3:36.70.563.2:36.80.5
11861186p-Cymen-8-ol0.1 tr 0.6
11951195α-Terpineol0.3100:00.2100:00.3
11971198Methylchavicol (= Estragole)--- 0.1 0.1
11971198cis-Piperitol--- --- 0.2
12171218trans-Carveol--- --- 0.2
12311232cis-Carveol--- --- 0.1
12401242Cuminaldehyde--- --- 0.1
12411242Carvone--- --- 0.3
12501241Pulegone--- 0.2 ---
12521252Thymoquinone8.4 2.3 41.3
12811282Bornyl acetate--- --- 0.1
12841286Cogeijerene0.1 --- ---
12911291p-Cymen-7-oltr --- 0.2
12951293Thymol54.3 62.2 8.9
13001300Carvacrol5.9 6.6 1.6
13071306iso-Ascaridoletr tr 0.1
13451346α-Cubebenetr tr tr
13511356Eugenoltr tr ---
13731375α-Copaene0.1100:00.1100:00.1100:0
13821382β-Bourbonene0.1 0.1 0.1
13871387trans-β-Elemenetr tr 0.1
14181419β-Ylangene tr 0.1
14191417(E)-β-Caryophyllene0.3100:00.3100:00.2100:0
14271430β-Copaene0.1 0.1 0.1
14521453α-Humulenetr tr tr
14731475γ-Muurolene0.1 0.2 0.1
14791479α-Amorphene--- tr ---
14801483trans-β-Bergamotene0.1 --- 0.1
14811480Germacrene D0.7100:00.6100:00.6100:0
14841485γ-Thujaplicin0.4 0.2 1.3
14881490γ-Amorphenetr --- ---
14911492β-Selinene0.1 0.1 0.1
14931492trans-Muurola-4(14),5-diene--- 0.1 ---
14961497epi-Cubebol--- tr ---
14971497α-Selinene--- 0.1 ---
14981497α-Muurolenetr 0.1 tr
15101512γ-Cadinene0.1 0.2 0.1
15111515Cubeboltr --- ---
15171518δ-Cadinene0.1 0.3 0.1
15181519trans-Calamenenetr tr ---
15201523β-Sesquiphellandrenetr --- ---
15371538α-Cadinenetr tr ---
15421541α-Calacorenetr tr ---
15431546α-Elemoltr --- ---
15481554Thymohydroquinone0.6 1.6 0.6
15581565Eugenyl acetatetr tr tr
15591557Germacrene Btr --- ---
15801577Caryophyllene oxidetr tr 0.1
16381639cis-Guaia-3,9-dien-11-ol0.1 0.1 ---
16511655α-Cadinoltr 0.1 tr
Monoterpene hydrocarbons22.8 18.3 31.4
Oxygenated monoterpenoids72.2 75.7 61.2
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons1.7 2.2 1.7
Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids0.1 0.1 0.1
Benzenoid aromatics0.1 0.1 0.1
Others3.1 3.6 4.3
Total identified100.0 100.0 98.7
RIcalc = Retention indices determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes on a ZB-5ms column. RIdb = Retention indices from the databases [7,8,9,10]. #1 = Plant sample #1. #2 = Plant sample #2. #3 = Plant sample #3. --- = Not observed. ED = Enantiomeric distribution (dextrorotatory enantiomer: levorotatory enantiomer). tr = Trace (<0.05%).
Table 3. Chemical composition of Monarda punctata essential oils growing wild in south Alabama.
Table 3. Chemical composition of Monarda punctata essential oils growing wild in south Alabama.
Aerial Parts Essential Oil
RIcalcRIdbCompound#1, %ED, (+):(−)#2, %ED, (+):(−)
923925α-Thujene0.1100:00.768.5:31.5
930932α-Pinenetr 0.283.8:16.2
945950Camphene--- 0.1100:0
957959Benzaldehyde--- tr
970971Sabinenetr tr
974978β-Pinenetr 0.162.7:37.3
9759741-Octen-3-ol1.8 1.8
9809833-Octanone--- tr
986989Myrcene0.3 1.1
9959963-Octanol0.1 0.1
10011004p-Mentha-1(7),8-diene--- tr
10041006α-Phellandrene0.1100:00.294.6:5.4
10061008δ-3-Carenetr 0.1100:0
10141017α-Terpinene1.3100:03.0100:0
10161022m-Cymene--- tr
10241024p-Cymene15.3 19.8
102510262-Acetyl-3-methylfuran--- tr
10261030Limonene0.450.2:49.80.50:100
10271029β-Phellandrene0.2 0.20:100
102810301,8-Cineole0.4 0.1
10391043Phenylacetaldehyde--- tr
10551057γ-Terpinene2.0 9.7
10661069cis-Sabinene hydrate0.6100:00.797.9:2.1
107610791-Nonen-3-ol--- tr
10821086Terpinolene0.1 0.1
10871091p-Cymenene0.1 0.1
10951099Linalool--- tr70.1:29.9
10981101trans-Sabinene hydrate0.2100:00.183.2:16.8
11001104Nonanal--- 0.1
110411071-Octen-3-yl acetate0.2 0.4
11451145trans-Verbenol--- tr
11611158Menthone0.3 ---
11681170Borneol0.10:100tr0:100
11771180Terpinen-4-ol0.858.7:41.30.666.1:33.9
11821183m-Cymen-8-ol--- 0.1
11841186p-Cymen-8-ol0.5 0.5
11911197Methyl chavicol (= Estragole)0.8 ---
11931195α-Terpineol--- 0.1100:0
12021206Decanal--- 0.1
12241224Thymol methyl ether--- tr
12351238Carvacrol methyl ether1.1 1.0
12391242Cumin aldehyde--- 0.1
12471250Thymoquinone2.0 0.2
12891289Thymol61.8 47.9
12931291p-Cymen-7-ol--- 0.2
12961296Carvacrol4.5 4.1
130613094-Vinylguaicol--- tr
13471356Eugenol0.7 0.3
13701375α-Copaene--- tr
13781382β-Bourbonene--- tr
13841390trans-β-Elemene--- tr
14151417(E)-β-Caryophyllene1.6100:01.2100:0
14241430β-Copaene--- tr
14271430trans-α-Bergamotene1.2 0.7
14491453α-Humulene--- tr
14691475γ-Muurolene--- 0.1
14761480Germacrene D0.7100:00.4100:0
14791483trans-β-Bergamotene0.2 0.1
14801485γ-Thujaplicin--- 0.1
14821489β-Selinene--- tr
14891492α-Selinene--- tr
14921497α-Muurolene--- tr
15061512γ-Cadinene--- tr
15121518δ-Cadinene--- 0.1
15171523β-Sesquiphellandrene--- 0.1
15461549Thymohydroquinone0.3 2.5
15761577Caryophyllene oxide0.2 0.2
16331639cis-Guaia-3,9-dien-11-ol0.2 0.1
16481655α-Cadinol--- tr
18341841Phytone--- tr
Monoterpene hydrocarbons19.9 35.7
Oxygenated monoterpenoids72.5 58.3
Sesquiterpene hydrocarbons3.7 2.7
Oxygenated sesquiterpenoids0.4 0.4
Benzenoid aromatics1.5 0.3
Others2.1 2.4
Total identified100.0 99.8
RIcalc = Retention indices determined with respect to a homologous series of n-alkanes on a ZB-5ms column. RIdb = Retention indices from the databases [7,8,9,10]. #1 = Plant sample #1. #2 = Plant sample #2. --- = Not observed. ED = Enantiomeric distribution (dextrorotatory enantiomer: levorotatory enantiomer). tr = Trace (<0.05%).
Table 4. Major essential oil components of Monarda species from geographical locations around the world.
Table 4. Major essential oil components of Monarda species from geographical locations around the world.
Monarda spp.Plant TissueCollection SiteComposition (Major Components)Ref.
M. citriodoraAerial partsJammu, India (cultivated)Thymol (82.3%), carvacrol (4.8%)[13]
M. citriodoraAerial partsImola (BO) Italy (cultivated)Thymol (19.6%), p-cymene (15.6%), γ-terpinene (13.5%), carvacrol (9.3%), α-terpinene (9.2%), myrcene (5.7%)[14]
M. citriodoraNot reportedCommercial (India)(E)-β-Caryophyllene (19.2%), citral a (13.3%), limonene (11.8%), cis-verbenol (11.4%), geraniol (7.6%), citronellal (5.6%)[15]
M. citriodora var. citriodoraLeavesLiverpool, UK (cultivated)Thymol (50.7%), p-cymene (22.8%), carvacrol (3.6%)[16]
M. citriodora var. citriodoraFlowersLiverpool, UK (cultivated)Thymol (61.8%), γ-terpinene (13.3%), p-cymene (4.2%), carvacrol (3.8%)[16]
M. citriodora var. citriodoraAerial partsLiverpool, UK (cultivated)Thymol (56.9%), p-cymene (13.0%), α-terpinene (10.0%), carvacrol (4.3%)[17]
M. citriodora var. citriodoraAerial partsCommercial (unknown)Thymol (70.6%), p-cymene (10.6%), carvacrol (6.1%)[18]
M. fistulosaAerial partsKrasnodarsk Krai, Russia (introduced, wild)p-Cymene (32.5%), carvacrol (23.9%), thymol (12.6%), carvacrol methyl ether (5.5%), unidentified aliphatic aldehyde (6.3%)[19]
M. fistulosaAerial partsCasola Valsenio, Italy (cultivated)Thymol (26.5%), β-phellandrene (17.0%), α-phellandrene (13.7%), p-cymene (13.5%), myrcene (8.1%)[20]
M. fistulosaAerial partsSaint-Jean-sur-Richelieu, QC, Canada (cultivated)Geraniol (61.8%), geranyl formate (16.6%), geranial (10.6%), neral (6.6%)[21]
M. fistulosaAerial partsPoplarville, MS, USA (cultivated)Carvacrol (39.1%), p-cymene (35.4%), (−)-1-octen-3-ol[22]
M. fistulosaAerial partsImola (BO) Italy (cultivated)Thymol (31.6%), β-phellandrene (18.1%), α-phellandrene (14.2%), p-cymene (13.1%), myrcene (8.8%)[23]
M. fistulosaAerial partsImola (BO) Italy (cultivated)Thymol (28.4%), β-phellandrene (16.9%), α-phellandrene (13.7%), p-cymene (13.3%), myrcene (8.7%)[24]
M. fistulosaAerial partsImola (BO) Italy (cultivated)Thymol (33.4%), β-phellandrene (18.0%), α-phellandrene (14.0%), p-cymene (13.2%), myrcene (8.6%)[24]
M. fistulosaAerial partsRavenna, Italy (cultivated)γ-Terpinene (25.2%), carvacrol (24.3%), p-cymene (11.0%; reported as o-cymene), thymol (8.4%), α-terpinene (5.0%), thymol methyl ether (4.7%)[25]
M. fistulosaAerial partsChişinău, Republic of Moldova (cultivated)Carvacrol (54.8%), p-cymene (23.2%), carvacrol methyl ether (5.9%)[26]
M. fistulosaFlowersGallatin Valley, MT, USA (wild)Carvacrol (45.7%), p-cymene (25.6%), γ-terpinen (6.8%), thymol (3.1%)[27]
M. fistulosaLeavesGallatin Valley, MT, USA (wild)Carvacrol (71.5%), p-cymene (13.1%), γ-terpinen (2.5%), thymol (3.3%)[27]
M. fistulosaAerial partsMoscow, Russia (cultivated)α-Terpineol (37.7%), 1-octen-3-ol (10.5%), geraniol (10.4%), thymol (9.3%), p-cymene (4.9%)[28]
M. fistulosa cv. FortunaAerial partsKherson, Ukraine (cultivated)Thymol (77.3%), carvacrol methyl ether (4.9%), carvacrol (3.8%)[6]
M. fistulosa cv. PremieraAerial partsKherson, Ukraine (cultivated)Thymol (78.3%), carvacrol methyl ether (4.8%), carvacrol (3.6%)[6]
M. fistulosa var. menthifoliaAerial partsMorden, Manitoba, Canada (cultivated)Geraniol (86.8%)[29]
M. punctataFlowersXi’an, China (cultivated?)Thymol (75.2%), p-cymene (6.7%), limonene (5.4%), carvacrol (3.5%)[30]
a Isomer not indicated.
Table 5. Hydrodistillation details of Monarda species collected or cultivated in south Alabama.
Table 5. Hydrodistillation details of Monarda species collected or cultivated in south Alabama.
Monarda spp.Mass Plant MaterialYield Essential Oil (EO)
Monarda citriodora #125.57 g dried aerial parts406.2 mg orange EO
Monarda citriodora #237.81 g dried aerial parts675.6 mg orange EO
Monarda citriodora #217.47 g dried roots153.6 mg yellow EO
Monarda fistulosa #19.60 g dried aerial parts364.0 mg bright orange EO
Monarda fistulosa #27.58 g dried aerial parts366.2 mg bright orange EO
Monarda fistulosa #38.98 g dried aerial parts238.9 mg bright orange EO
Monarda punctata #139.09 g dried aerial parts305.6 mg bright orange EO
Monarda punctata #262.62 g dried aerial parts411.9 mg bright orange EO
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lawson, S.K.; Satyal, P.; Setzer, W.N. The Volatile Phytochemistry of Monarda Species Growing in South Alabama. Plants 2021, 10, 482. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10030482

AMA Style

Lawson SK, Satyal P, Setzer WN. The Volatile Phytochemistry of Monarda Species Growing in South Alabama. Plants. 2021; 10(3):482. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10030482

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lawson, Sims K., Prabodh Satyal, and William N. Setzer. 2021. "The Volatile Phytochemistry of Monarda Species Growing in South Alabama" Plants 10, no. 3: 482. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10030482

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop