Next Article in Journal
Genetic Diversity and Pathogenicity of Botryosphaeriaceae Species Associated with Symptomatic Citrus Plants in Europe
Previous Article in Journal
Biotic and Abiotic Elicitors of Stilbenes Production in Vitis vinifera L. Cell Culture
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Improved C4 Xero-Halophyte Kochia prostrata Physiological Performance under Saline Conditions

by
Zulfira Rakhmankulova
1,
Elena Shuyskaya
1,*,
Kristina Toderich
2,3 and
Pavel Voronin
1
1
K.A. Timiryazev Institute of Plant Physiology RAS, IPP RAS, 35 Botanicheskaya St., 127276 Moscow, Russia
2
International Platform for Dryland Research and Education, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori 680-0001, Japan
3
International Center for Biosaline Agriculture for Central Asia and Caucasus, Tashkent 100000, Uzbekistan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 22 January 2021 / Revised: 20 February 2021 / Accepted: 2 March 2021 / Published: 5 March 2021

Abstract

:
A significant increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration and associated climate aridization and soil salinity are factors affecting the growth, development, productivity, and stress responses of plants. In this study, the effect of ambient (400 ppm) and elevated (800 ppm) CO2 concentrations were evaluated on the C4 xero-halophyte Kochia prostrata treated with moderate salinity (200 mM NaCl) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced osmotic stress. Our results indicated that plants grown at elevated CO2 concentration had different responses to osmotic stress and salinity. The synergistic effect of elevated CO2 and osmotic stress increased proline accumulation, but elevated CO2 did not mitigate the negative effects of osmotic stress on dark respiration intensity and photosystem II (PSII) efficiency. This indicates a stressful state, which is accompanied by a decrease in the efficiency of light reactions of photosynthesis and significant dissipative respiratory losses, thereby resulting in growth inhibition. Plants grown at elevated CO2 concentration and salinity showed high Na+ and proline contents, high water-use efficiency and time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level (PSI), and low dark respiration. Maintaining stable water balance, the efficient functioning of cyclic transport of PSI, and the reduction of dissipation costs contributed to an increase in dry shoot biomass (2-fold, compared with salinity at 400 ppm CO2). The obtained experimental data and PCA showed that elevated CO2 concentration improved the physiological parameters of K. prostrata under salinity.

1. Introduction

According to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), a significant increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration, associated climate aridization, and soil salinity are factors affecting the growth, development, and functioning of plants, which can potentially change the composition of plant communities, spread of ecosystems, and lead to a catastrophic decrease in biodiversity [1,2,3]. Therefore, issues related to the impact of global climatic changes on vegetation are leading in biological science. C4 plants have long been considered less dependent on environmental CO2 concentration than their C3 counterparts due to the presence of a carbon-concentrating mechanism (CCM), which makes them less responsive to an increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration [4,5]. This concept is deeply embedded in climatic and ecological models of climate change impact on plants [5,6,7]. However, recently, contradicting information appeared on this issue. On the one hand, it was shown that in C4 halophytes of the Chenopodiaceae family, a high CO2 concentration more effectively stimulates photosynthetic metabolism than in C3 species [8] and is associated with an improved water-use efficiency (WUE) [2]. Alternatively, high CO2 concentration may not lead to significant changes in the visible photosynthesis and transpiration [2] and may even decrease the carboxylation efficiency and the CO2 saturated rate of photosynthesis in C4 plants [9]. For example, it has been shown that high (>800 ppm) and ultra-high (>1000 ppm) CO2 concentrations decrease the intensity of photosynthesis in both C3 and C4 species [3,10]. Based on this, experiments that studied the effect of “doubling the CO2 concentration” in C4 plants are relevant, since modern climate models can both overestimate or underestimate the potential impact of future climate changes on global agriculture and ecosystems [3]. Conditions accompanying an increase in CO2 concentration in the atmosphere, such as intense sunlight, drought, variable and elevated temperatures, salinity, and the availability of essential nutrients can become inhibitory factors for plant growth [11]. Water deficit and salinity, which are considered more relevant within a 30-year time frame will have a stronger negative effect on the planet survival than the actual change in CO2 atmospheric concentration [11]. Studies on the synergistic effect of high CO2 concentration and moderate drought have shown positive effects of high CO2 conditions on the drought tolerance of some C3 and C4 species [12,13]. However, according to some studies, C3 plants are more competitive than C4 species under these conditions [14,15], while according to others, the intensity of photosynthesis increases in C4 plants [15,16] due to more efficient water usage [17]. A study on the combined effect of high CO2 concentration and salinity showed that increased CO2 concentration (500 ppm) enhances the expression of salt-sensitive genes in both C3 and C4 species [8]. In the C3 halophyte Salicornia ramosissima, the synergistic effect of 700 ppm CO2 at 510 mM NaCl led to a high net photosynthesis rate and an improvement in the water balance of plants associated with a decrease in stomatal conductance, and adjustment of osmotic potential due to an increase in Na+ content in plant tissues [1], which resulted in increased WUE [18]. Despite these positive effects, no significant changes in biomass growth were observed. The authors explained this fact as the investment of the higher energy in protective mechanisms against salt stress [1].
Due to the multifactorial nature of global climatic changes, species characterized by drought and salt tolerance, xero-halophytes, are of increasing interest. These plants possess a complex of protective and adaptive strategies that allow them to resist and actively grow under conditions of osmotic stress, ionic toxicity, impaired mineral nutrition and metabolism, oxidative stress, disorganized membranes, and to use the energy potential more efficiently [19]. Therefore, xero-halophytes serve as an important resource for studying the mechanisms of drought and salt tolerance as well as identifying and developing new systems in crop production and phytomelioration [20,21]. One of the largest families of the arid and semi-arid territories is the Chenopodiaceae, a feature of which is the presence of closely related species—xero-halophytes—with different types of photosynthetic metabolism and different tolerance to drought and salinity [22]. Currently, species of this family are used to study C4 evolution [23,24], and they are also of practical interest; particularly, they are also actively used in ecological restoration of degraded agricultural landscapes and marginal territories in the production of forage in dry lands [25]. Studies on the impact of high CO2 concentration on the tolerance of xero-halophytes to drought and salinity are insufficient and fragmentary. This study compared the effect of ambient (400 ppm) and elevated CO2 concentration (800 ppm) on the tolerance of the C4 xero-halophyte Kochia prostrata (Chenopodiaceae) to moderate salinity (200 mM NaCl) and polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced osmotic stress with a similar osmotic potential (−0.6 MPa).

2. Results

The C4 xero-halophyte Kochia prostrata grown at an ambient CO2 concentration (aCO2) was equally intolerant to moderate osmotic stress and salinity. Dry biomass and shoot length decreased 2-fold and 1.3-fold, respectively (Figure 1a,b). Growing plants under elevated CO2 (eCO2) led to a slight decrease in dry biomass accumulation in control plants (1.2-fold) (Figure 1a), but the shoot length remained unchanged (Figure 1b). At elevated CO2, a 4-d exposure to osmotic stress (eCO2 + Osm) did not affect dry biomass and reduced the shoot length of plants (1.2-fold) (Figure 1a,b). Whereas, a 4-d salinity exposure at elevated CO2 (eCO2 + Salt) stimulated dry biomass accumulation by 2-fold (compared with aCO2 + Salt) (Figure 1a).
A study on CO2/H2O gas exchange in K. prostrata showed that the intensity of apparent photosynthesis (A) did not significantly change at elevated CO2 as well as at PEG-induced osmotic stress and moderate salinity with a similar osmotic potential (Figure 2a). Transpiration intensity (E) decreased 1.4-fold in plants at both aCO2 + Osm and aCO2 + Salt. Elevated CO2 did not affect the transpiration intensity at all treatments (Figure 2b). Dark respiration intensity (Rd) increased 1.5-fold at aCO2 + Osm, 1.3-fold at eCO2, and 1.5-fold under the combined effect of osmotic stress and elevated CO2 (eCO2 + Osm) (Figure 2c). Under eCO2 + Salt, there was a decrease in Rd to control values at 400 ppm (aCO2). A decrease in transpiration intensity led to a 1.4-fold increase in water-use efficiency at all treatments (Figure 2d).
A study on the efficiency of photosystems of K. prostrata showed that the time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level under far-red light (PSI) decreased 1.6-fold at both aCO2 + Osm and aCO2 + Salt. In plants grown under eCO2, this parameter decreased 1.7-fold (Figure 3a). Similar changes were seen in plants grown under elevated CO2 and exposed to osmotic stress (eCO2 + Osm). However, at eCO2 + Salt, it was observed that the time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level increased to values at aCO2 (Figure 3a). PSII efficiency decreased at aCO2 + Osm and under the combined effect of eCO2 + Osm (Figure 3b).
A study on free proline content showed a 1.2-fold increase in plants at eCO2. The combined effect of eCO2 + Salt led to a 1.3-fold increase in proline content. The most significant increase (1.5-fold) in proline content was observed under the combined effect of eCO2 + Osm (Figure 3c). At both aCO2 + Salt and eCO2 + Salt, an increase in Na+ accumulation in K. prostrata tissues was observed (on average, 6-fold higher than in control plants) (Figure 3d). There were no differences in K+ content and K+/Na+ ration under stress conditions at both CO2 concentrations. K+ content varied from 1.48 ± 0.31 to 1.76 ± 0.03 mmol g−1 DW under stress conditions regardless of CO2 concentrations. K+/Na+ ration averaged 19.3 ± 0.9 under osmotic stress and 2.7 ± 0.2 under salinity at both CO2 concentrations.
To assess the possible synchronous impact of eCO2 + Salt and eCO2 + Osm on the growth and physiological reactions of K. prostrata, principal component analysis (PCA) of biochemical and physiological parameters was performed. Plants grown at ambient CO2 were distinguished into three groups: control, drought, and saline conditions, separated by the first main component (PC1) (Figure 4a). Within plants grown at elevated CO2, groups of plants under osmotic stress (eCO2 + Osm) were distinguished by PC1 and intersected with plants grown at aCO2 + Osm (Figure 4a). Plants at eCO2 + Salt overlapped with those at both aCO2 and eCO2. The main elements of PC1 were growth parameters: shoot length (L) and dry biomass (DW) as well as PSII efficiency (Table 1). The second main component (PC2) did not give a clear division into groups, except for aCO2 + Salt. Here, the main significant factors were water, Na+, and proline content. The first two principal components (PC1 and PC2) are sufficient to explain 55% of the total variation.
To identify the relationships between factors involved in the adaptive mechanisms to salinity at elevated CO2 conditions, a multivariate statistical approach using PCA was performed (Figure 4b). The results revealed that the aboveground dry biomass positively correlated with the apparent photosynthesis intensity (A) and the time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level under far-red light (PSI), i.e., with the activity of cyclic electron transport. These parameters negatively correlated with the dark respiration intensity (Rd). Na+ accumulation was not directly related to plant productivity. Na+ and proline contents correlated positively with WUE and maximum quantum yield of PSII, i.e., maintaining water balance, ensuring high WUE, and efficiency of the photosynthetic electron transport chain.

3. Discussion

The negative effect of salinity on plant growth is associated with a low osmotic potential of the soil solution (osmotic stress) and toxic ionic effects (ionic stress); therefore, in this study, we investigated the differential effects of elevated CO2 concentration on the tolerance of C4 xero-halophyte K. prostrata to PEG-induced osmotic stress and NaCl-induced salinity (combined ionic and osmotic stress). Both of these stresses are usually accompanied by oxidative stress in plants. In our experiments, we specially used low PEG and NaCl concentrations for euhalophyte to create moderate osmotic and ionic stresses, which do not cause significant damage to photosynthetic membranes (PS II, Figure 3b) and cytotoxic effect (K+ and proline contents did not change under both stresses at 400 ppm CO2). Halophytes adapt to salinity, accumulating Na+ ions through selective ion transport and ionic compartmentation (usually in vacuoles) [26], while they synthesize compatible solutes in the cytoplasm to prevent adverse effects of salts on metabolism and growth [27]. Growth parameters are an integral characteristic of the implementation of adaptive physiological and biochemical mechanisms. Plants grown at elevated CO2 (800 ppm) showed a decrease in dry biomass compared with control plants at 400 ppm CO2 (Figure 1). Although there is ample evidence that C4 plants can accumulate more biomass at elevated CO2 partial pressure, the mechanisms underlying this response are largely unclear [28]. Elevated CO2 can influence the biomass accumulation of C4 plants in two ways: due to an increase in the rate of CO2 assimilation in leaves because of an increase in intercellular CO2 concentration or through a decrease in stomatal conductance and, accordingly, the rate of leaf transpiration. A decrease in the transpiration rate can improve water exchange in shoots and increase leaf temperature [26]. In addition to these two main components, the intensity of dark respiration can also affect dry biomass accumulation [15,29], because Rd can significantly increase with an increase in leaf temperature [28]. Understanding the role of plant respiration at elevated CO2 is further complicated by the presence of an alternative pathway, which consumes photosynthetic products without producing chemical energy (ATP) [30], thereby leading to significant dissipation losses. Analysis of CO2/H2O gas exchange in the C4 xero-halophyte K. prostrata did not reveal significant changes in apparent photosynthesis and transpiration intensity and, accordingly, WUE at elevated CO2 concentration (Figure 2a,b,d). A decrease in biomass under these conditions can be explained by an increase in the dark respiration intensity (Figure 2c), which is possibly associated with additional energy costs for proline biosynthesis [31], leading to a 1.2-fold increase in its content (Figure 3c), also with an increase in dissipation processes.
In C4 plants, both C3 and C4 photosynthesis cycles are functionally active, increasing the energy cost of CO2 assimilation in comparison with C3 plants. Consequently, two additional ATP molecules are required for each CO2 molecule fixed by the C4 cycle. It is assumed that additional ATP is produced by cyclic electron transport around PSI, contributing to the generation of a pH gradient across the thylakoid membrane without the formation of nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) [32]. Comparative analysis within the genus, Flaveria, which includes C3, intermediate C3–C4, and C4 species showed that C4 plants exhibited higher gene expression of proteins involved in the cyclic electron transport of PSI and changes in the thylakoid structure, thereby contributing to an increased activity of the cyclic electron flux [32]. In our experiments, K. prostrata grown at elevated CO2 conditions showed a 1.7-fold decrease in the time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level under far-red light (PSI), i.e., a decrease in the intensity of cyclic electron transport, which indirectly indicates a decrease in the activity of C4 CCM. Thus, a decrease in plant dry biomass at elevated CO2 can be associated with both an increase in dissipation costs during respiration and a decrease in the intensity of the cyclic electron transport around PSI and, possibly, with a less efficient CCM.
Conditions that accompany an increase in atmospheric CO2 also have a significant impact on other environmental factors. Particularly, water deficit and salinity, separately or interacting with each other, can inhibit plant growth [11]. Our studies have shown that at ambient CO2, the C4 xero-halophyte K. prostrata is intolerant to moderate salinity (200 mM NaCl) and moderate PEG-induced osmotic stress with a similar osmotic potential (−0.6 MPa). A significant decrease in dry biomass accumulation and plant height was observed at both treatments (Figure 1a,b). K. prostrata grown under elevated CO2 reacted differently to osmotic stress and salinity (osmotic and ionic stress). At elevated CO2, plant dry biomass increased (up to aCO2) only under salinity. Under these conditions, elevated Na+ and proline contents in plant tissues were observed (Figure 3c,d). Sodium ions are cheap osmoticum to lower the cell osmotic potential and hence prevent water loss [26]. In the experiments, we used moderate salinity (200 мM NaCl), which caused 2-fold decreased dry biomass, but it did not lead to cytotoxicity, since a noticeable kosmotropic effect of Na+ in halophytes usually requires a concentration >200 мM NaCl [26]. The amino acid proline plays an important role in plant metabolism and development. Free proline participates in the maintenance of cellular homeostasis, including redox balance and energy status, and it acts as an osmolyte and antioxidant under stress conditions. Proline can function as a signaling molecule [31]. In C4 halophytes (Suaeda monoica, S. fruticosa) grown at high CO2 concentration (900 ppm), 13-54-fold increased proline content was shown as compared to plants grown at 400 ppm CO2 [33]. Under high CO2 concentration, free proline can play an osmoprotective, regulatory, antioxidant, and energetic function in C4 halophytes. The sodium and proline accumulation ensured a stable water balance in K. prostrata plants, which is confirmed by the absence of a decrease in the maximum quantum yield of PSII (Figure 3b), constant A and E (Figure 2a,b), a decrease in dissipation costs Rd (Figure 2c), and a 1.4-fold increase in the time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level (PSI) (compared with aCO2 + Salt) (Figure 3a), and, probably, the activation of cyclic electron transport intensity led to a 2-fold increase in dry biomass (compare with aCO2 + Salt) (Figure 1a) up to the growth of plants at aCO2. The positive effect of elevated CO2 concentration on salt tolerance was seen in some C4 halophytes: an increase in salt-responsive genes expression [8] and in WUE [1,18].
The combine effect of elevated CO2 concentration and osmotic stress led to high proline content and dark respiration intensity (Figure 2c and Figure 3c), indicating a stress state, de-coordination of physiological processes, and an increase in dissipation costs. A decrease in PSII efficiency, as well as the reduced time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level (PSI) (Figure 3a,b) indicates a deficit in energy, which decreased growth parameters (compare with aCO2). However, note that if a decrease in dry biomass was significant at aCO2 + Osm (2-fold), then at eCO2 + Osm, a decrease in growth is insignificant (Figure 1a). Thus, elevated CO2 has some softening and protective effect on osmotic stress, which is consistent with the results in other studies [12,13].

4. Materials and Methods

4.1. Plant Material

Kochia prostrata [L.] Schrad. (Chenopodiaceae) is a highly productive, drought- and salt-tolerant plant grown in arid and semi-arid rangelands of Central Eurasia and the western U.S. [34,35,36]. K. prostrata is typical salt accumulating halophyte whose optimal germination occurred at 0–1% NaCl [37] and optimal growth occurred up to 150 mM NaCl [38]. K. prostrata also has great potential for establishing palatable perennial shrubs in arid rangeland at 70 mm annual precipitation [39] and in saline soils (EC = 20 dS/m) [36].

4.2. Growth Conditions

Seeds of Kochia prostrata (L.) Schrad. were germinated on filter paper soaked in distilled water within 7–11 days. After that, the seedlings were transplanted to perlite in plastics containers of 24-cm length, 20-cm width, and 10-cm depth. There were 20 seedlings per container. Each plastic container was placed on separate plastic tray. During next 30 days, the seedlings were grown using the nutrient solution 50% Hoagland, which was added to each plastic tray. The seedlings were grown in two separated climate chambers under circadian illumination (using commercial luminescent white light tubes): 10-h dark/14-h light (200 µmol m−2 s−1 PAR, light meter LI-205A (Li-Cor, USA)), 25 ± 5 °C temperature and two levels of CO2 concentrations: in the first chamber, 60 plants were grown at ambient (400 ppm) CO2, and in the second chamber, another 60 plants were grown at elevated (800 ppm) CO2 [40]. When plants were 30 days old, we started treatment with solutes of 15.8% (m/v) PEG 6000 (−0.6 MPa) (20 plants at 400 ppm and 20 plants at 800 ppm CO2) and 200 mM NaCl with equivalent osmotic potential (20 plants at 400 ppm and 20 plants at 800 ppm CO2). The osmotic potential of the experimental solution was measured using a freezing-point osmometer Osmomat 030 (Gonotec, Germany). Experimental solutions of PEG and NaCl were prepared on the basis of 50% Hoagland solution. A total of 20 plants at 400 ppm and 20 plants at 800 ppm CO2 continued to grow on 50% Hoagland in solution and then were used as control. Solutions were added to a plastic tray. Plants were treated by PEG and NaCl during 4 days. The physiological measurements were carried out on the plants at the end of the 4th day of treatment. In general, 6 experimental variants were used: (1) growing at ambient (400 ppm) CO2 without treatment (aCO2); (2) growing at 400 ppm CO2 + 4 days treated by PEG-induced osmotic stress (aCO2 + Osm); (3) growing at 400 ppm CO2 + 4 days treated by NaCl-induced salinity (aCO2 + Salt); (4) growing at elevated (800 ppm) CO2 without treatment (eCO2); (5) growing at 800 ppm CO2 + 4 days treated by PEG-induced osmotic stress (eCO2 + Osm); (6) growing at 800 ppm CO2 + 4 days treated by NaCl-induced salinity (eCO2 + Salt). Plant tolerance to osmotic stress/salinity was assessed by the decrease in its productivity compared with the control.

4.3. Dry Biomass and Water Content

At the end of the experiment, water content (W, g g−1 DW) was assessed for the shoots in all the groups. Biomass was estimated for dry shoots (DW). Plant samples were dried at 80 °C for 2 days until reaching a constant mass in order to measure quantitatively the dry shoot matter. The water content in the shoots for each treatment and control group was calculated as W = (FW − DW)/DW.

4.4. Proline and Na+ Ion Contents

Free proline was determined according to Bates [41] with modifications. Dry shoot samples (0.2 g) from each group were homogenized in 2 mL of boiling distilled water, heated at 100 °C for 10 min in a water bath, and then, the homogenates were centrifuged (5 min, 14,000 g). One ml of homogenate was reacted with one ml of acidic ninhydrin (ninhydrin 1% (w/v) in acetic acid 60% (v/v), ethanol 20% (v/v)), and one ml of glacial acetic acid in a tube for 1 h at 100 °C in a water bath, and the reaction was terminated in an ice bath. The mixtures were read at 520 nm using a spectrophotometer (Genesys 10 UV Scanning, ThermoFisher Scientific, USA). Proline concentrations were determined using a calibration curve and expressed as mg g−1 DW. Na+ and K+ contents in the shoots were determined in water extracts from 100 mg of dry samples by atomic absorption spectrometry (Hitachi 207, Hitachi, Tokyo, Japan), according to the manufacturer’s standard protocol.

4.5. CO2/H2O Gas Exchange

The CO2/H2O exchange was analyzed by placing a leaf segment into a temperature-controlled leaf chamber where the sample was illuminated through a fiber-optic light guide from a KL 1500LCD light source (Schott, Germany). The steady-state CO2/H2O exchange rates at the leaf–air interface were measured with a single-channel LI-820 infrared gas analyzer (LI-COR, United States) in the open-circuit mode. Apparent photosynthesis (A) was expressed as µmol (CO2) m−2 s−1. The leaf transpiration (E, mmol (H2O) m−2 s−1) was calculated from the difference in gas humidity at the inlet and outlet from the leaf chamber. In this experimental system, the humidity of gas flow at the entrance to the leaf chamber was kept constant at a known level using a LI-610 dew point generator (LI-COR). Humidity at the exit of the leaf chamber was determined with a HMP50 psychrometric sensor (Vaisala INTERCAP, Finland). Water-use efficiency (WUE) was calculated as the ratio of apparent photosynthetic assimilation to the transpiration rate (A/E). After CO2/H2O gas exchange measuring, the light was turned off, and after steady state, the dark respiration (Rd, µmol (CO2) m−2 s−1) was measured.

4.6. Photosystem I

The redox potential changes of chlorophyll P700 were measured by monitoring the leaf absorbance at 820 nm using a dual-wavelength ED-P700DW pulse modulated system (Walz, Germany) in combination with a PAM 101 fluorometer (Walz) [42]. The kinetics of P700 oxidation was measured under illumination with far-red light (720 nm, 17.2 W m−2). The level of maximum P700 oxidation was determined by applying the flash from a xenon gas-discharge lamp (50 ms, 1500 Wm−2; Walz) in the presence of far-red light.

4.7. Photosystem II

The quantum yield of PSII photoreaction in dark adapted (20 min) leaf was determined with a pulse-amplitude-modulated chlorophyll fluorometer (PAM 101, Walz) [43]. The ratio of variable to maximum chlorophyll a fluorescence (Fv/Fm) was used as a measure of the maximum quantum yield of PSII reaction. During measurements, the sample was illuminated with weak modulated red light. The output signal of PAM 101 was processed with an analog–digital convertor (PDA-100, Walz) and displayed on a computer. The potential photosynthetic efficiency of dark adapted leaves was estimated from the values of minimal (F0) and maximal (Fm) fluorescence using an expression: Fv/Fm= (Fm − F0)/Fm.

4.8. Statistical Analysis

All of the physiological measurements were performed seven times, and the means and standard errors (SEs) are calculated using Sigma Plot 12.0 statistical program. Comparisons of parameters were made between treatments using analysis of variance (ANOVA) with the Tukey test. Differences were considered significant at p < 0.05. Statistical software package R was used to perform a multivariate statistical approach using a principal component analysis model (PCA).

5. Conclusions

It is clear that future climate conditions, such as elevated CO2, drought, and salinity, are likely to negatively impact the growth and productivity of plants. Results obtained showed that the C4 xero-halophyte K. prostrata grown at ambient CO2 concentration (400 ppm) was equally intolerant to osmotic stress and salinity (a combination of osmotic and ionic stress). Dry biomass and shoot length decreased under both stresses. A decrease in the time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level (PSI) indirectly indicates a decrease in the intensity of cyclic electron transport, which is inherent in C4 plants. A decrease in transpiration intensity also increased water-use efficiency. The differences in plant response to osmotic stress and salinity at 400 ppm CO2 were as follows: PSII efficiency decreased and dark respiration increased under osmotic stress, while Na+ ion accumulation increased in plant tissues under salinity.
At elevated CO2, K. prostrata reacted differently to osmotic stress and salinity. The synergetic effect of elevated CO2 and osmotic stress resulted in a high proline content, but elevated CO2 did not mitigate the negative effects of osmotic stress on dark respiration intensity and PSII efficiency. All these indicate a stressful state, which is accompanied by a decrease in the efficiency of light reactions of photosynthesis and significant dissipative respiratory losses, thereby decreasing growth parameters. Plants grown at elevated CO2 conditions and treated with salt displayed Na+ and proline accumulation in plant tissues, high WUE and time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level (1.4-fold, compared with aCO2 + Salt), and low dark respiration efficiency. Maintaining a stable water exchange, efficient functioning of the cyclic transport of electrons of PSI, and decrease in dissipation costs probably contributed to an increase in dry shoot biomass (2-fold, compared with aCO2 + Salt). Thus, based on the results, we can conclude that elevated CO2 concentration has a positive effect on the productivity and tolerance to salinity of the C4 xero-halophyte K. prostrata, maintaining the water and energy status, and stimulating the cyclic electron transport, producing additional ATP for the C4 carbon-concentrating mechanism. All this contributes to the maintenance of high dry biomass.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.R. and E.S.; methodology, Z.R., E.S. and P.V.; software, E.S.; validation, Z.R., E.S., P.V. and K.T.; formal analysis, Z.R., E.S., K.T. and P.V.; investigation, Z.R., E.S. and P.V.; resources, K.T.; data curation, E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, Z.R.; writing—review and editing, Z.R. and E.S.; visualization, E.S.; supervision, E.S. and K.T., project administration, E.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation (theme FFES-2021-0010).

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

We are grateful for the International Drylands Platform for Research and Education (IPDRE), Tottori University for technical support in submission of this article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References and Note

  1. Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Idaszkin, Y.; Barcia-Piedras, J.M.; Duarte, B.; Redondo-Gomez, S.; Caçador, I.; Mateos-Naranjo, E. Disentangling the effect of atmospheric CO2 enrichment on the halophyte Salicornia ramosissima J. Woods physiological performance under optimal and suboptimal saline conditions. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 617–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. De Faria, A.P.; Marabesi, M.A.; Gaspar, M.; França, M.G.C. The increase of current atmospheric CO2 and temperature can benefit leaf gas exchanges, carbohydrate content and growth in C4 grass invaders of the Cerrado biome. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2018, 127, 608–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zheng, Y.; Li, F.; Hao, L.; Yu, J.; Guo, L.; Zhou, H.; Ma, C.; Zhang, X.; Xu, M. Elevated CO2 concentration induces photosynthetic down-regulation with changes in leaf structure, non-structural carbohydrates and nitrogen content of soybean. BMC Plant. Biol. 2019, 19, 255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sage, R.F.; Kubien, D.S. The temperature response of C3 and C4 photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 1086–1106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Reich, P.B.; Hobbie, S.E.; Lee, T.D.; Pastore, M.A. Unexpected reversal of C3 versus C4 grass response to elevated CO2 during a 20-year field experiment. Science 2018, 360, 317–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Harper, A.B.; Cox, P.M.; Friedlingstein, P.; Wiltshire, A.J.; Jones, C.D.; Sitch, S.; Mercado, L.M.; Groenendijk, M.; Robertson, E.; Kattge, J. Improved representation of plant functional types and physiology in the Joint UK Land Environment Simulator (JULES v4.2) using plant trait information. Geosci. Model. Dev. 2016, 9, 2415–2440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Luo, Y.; Gerten, D.; Le Maire, G.; Parton, W.J.; Weng, E.; Zhou, X.; Keough, C.; Beier, C.; Ciais, P.; Cramer, W.; et al. Modeled interactive effects of precipitation, temperature, and [CO2] on ecosystem carbon and water dynamics in different climatic zones. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2008, 14, 1986–1999. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jothiramshekar, S.; Benjamin, J.J.; Krishnasamy, R.; Pal, A.K.; George, S.; Swaminathan, R.; Parida, A.K. Responses of selected C3 and C4 halophytes to elevated CO2 concentration under salinity. Curr. Sci. 2018, 115, 129–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Watling, J.R.; Press, M.C.; Quick, W.P. Elevated CO2 induces biochemical and ultrastructural changes in leaves of the C4 cereal Sorghum. Plant. Physiol. 2019, 123, 1143–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, M.; Xie, B.; Fu, Y.; Dong, C.; Hui, L.; Guanghui, L.; Liu, H. Effects of different elevated CO2 concentrations on chlorophyll contents, gas exchange, water use efficiency, and PSII activation C3 and C4 cereal crops in a closed artificial ecosystem. Photosynth Res. 2015, 126, 351–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Boretti, A.; Florentine, S. Atmospheric CO2 concentration and other limiting factors in the growth of C3 and C4 plants. Plants 2019, 8, 92. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hamim, H. Photosynthesis of C3 and C4 species in response to increased CO2 concentration and drought stress. HAYATI 2005, 12, 131–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, X.; Zhang, H.; Wang, J.; Wu, X.; Ma, S.; Xu, Z.; Zhou, T.; Xu, N.; Tang, X.; An, B. Increased CO2 concentrations increasing water use efficiency and improvement PSII function of mulberry seedling leaves under drought stress. J. Plant. Interact. 2019, 14, 213–223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Wand, S.J.E.; Midgley, G.F.; Jones, M.H.; Curtis, P.S. Responses of wild C2 and C3 grass (Poaceae) species to elevated atmospheric CO2 concentration: Ameta-analytic test of current theories and perceptions. Glob. Chang. Biol. 1999, 5, 723–741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Lara, M.V.; Andreo, C.S. C4 Plants adaptation to high levels of CO2 and to drought environments. In Abiotic Stress in Plants—Mechanisms and Adaptations; Shanker, A., Ed.; InTech: Vienna, Austria, 2011; Volume 18, pp. 415–428. ISBN 978-953-307-394-1. Available online: http://www.intechopen.com/books/abiotic-stress-in-plantsmechanisms-and-adaptations/c4-plants-adaptation-to-high-levels-of-co2-and-to-drought-environments (accessed on 1 October 2020).
  16. Leakey, A.D.B. Rising atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration and the future of C4 crops for food and fuel. Proc. R. Soc. B 2009, 276, 2333–2343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Quirk, J.; Bellasio, C.; Johnson, D.A.; Beerling, D.J. Response of photosynthesis, growth and water relations of a savannah-adapted tree and grass grown across high to low CO2. Ann. Bot. 2019, 124, 77–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Pérez-Romero, J.A.; Duarte, B.; Barcia-Piedras, J.-M.; Matos, A.R.; Redondo-Gómeza, S.; Caçadorc, I.; Mateos-Naranjo, E. Investigating the physiological mechanisms underlying Salicorniaramosissima response to atmospheric CO2 enrichment under coexistence of prolonged soil flooding and saline excess. Plant. Physiol. Biochem. 2019, 135, 149–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Nikalje, G.C.; Nikam, T.D.; Suprasanna, P. Looking at halophytic adaptation to high salinity through genomics landscape. Curr. Genom. 2017, 18, 542–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hamed, K.B.; Ellouzi, H.; Talb, O.Z.; Hessini, K.; Slama, I.; Ghnaya, T.; Bosch, S.M.; Savouré, A.; Abdelly, C. Physiological response of halophytes to multiple stresses. Funct. Plant. Biol. 2013, 40, 883–896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Panta, S.; Flowers, T.; Lane, P.; Doyle, R.; Haros, G.; Shabala, S. Halophyte agriculture: Success stories. Environ. Exp. Bot. 2014, 107, 71–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lauterbach, M.; Schmidt, H.; Billakurthi, K.; Hankeln, T.; Westhoff, P.; Gowik, U.; Kadereit, G. Denovo transcriptome assembly and comparison of C3, C3-C4, and C4 species of tribe Salsoleae (Chenopodiaceae). Front. Plant. Sci. 2017, 8, 1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Sage, R.F.; Sage, T.L.; Kocacinar, F. Photorespiration and the evolution of C4 photosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant. Biol. 2012, 63, 17.1–17.29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yorimitsu, Y.; Kadosono, A.; Hatakeyama, Y.; Yabiku, T.; Ueno, O. Transition from C3 to proto-Kranz to C3–C4 intermediate type in the genus Chenopodium (Chenopodiaceae). J. Plant. Res. 2019, 132, 839–855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Qadir, M.; Tubeileh, A.; Akhtar, J.; Larbi, A.; Minhas, P.; Khan, M. Productivity enhancement of salt-affected environments through crop diversification. Land Degrad. Dev. 2008, 19, 429–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Isayenkov, S.V.; Maathuis, F.J.M. Plant Salinity Stress: Many Unanswered Questions Remain. Front. Plant. Sci. 2019, 10, 80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Flowers, T.J.; Munns, R.; Colmer, T.D. Sodium chloride toxicity and the cellular basis of salt tolerance in halophytes. Ann. Bot. 2015, 115, 419–431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Ghannoum, O.; Von Caemmerer, S.; Ziska, L.H.; Conroy, J.P. The growth response of C4 plants to rising atmospheric CO2 partial pressure: A reassessment. Plant. Cell Environ. 2000, 23, 931–942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Reddy, A.R.; Rasineni, G.K.; Raghavendra, A.S. The impact of global elevated CO2 concentration on photosynthesis and plant productivity. Curr. Sci. 2010, 99, 46–57. [Google Scholar]
  30. Gonzàlez-Meler, M.A.; Blanc-Betes, E.; Flower, C.E.; Ward, J.K.; Gomez-Casanovas, N. Plastic and adaptive responses of plant respiration to changes in atmospheric CO2 concentration. Physiol. Plant. 2009, 137, 473–484. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hayat, S.; Hayat, Q.; Alyemeni, M.N.; Wani, A.S.; Pichtel, J.; Ahmad, A. Role of proline under changing environments: A review. Plant. Signal. Behav. 2012, 7, 1456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Nakamura, N.; Iwano, M.; Havaux, M.; Yokota, A.; Munekage, Y.N. Promotion of cyclic electron transportaround photosystem I during the evolution of NADP malic enzyme-type C photosynthesis in the genus Flaveria. New Phytol. 2013, 199, 832–842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Yadav, S.; Elansary, H.O.; Mattar, M.A.; MElhindi, K.A.; Alotaibi, M.; Mishra, A. Differential Accumulation of Metabolites in Suaeda Species Provides New Insights into Abiotic Stress Tolerance in C4-Halophytic Species in Elevated CO2 Conditions. Agronomy 2021, 11, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Balyan, G. Kochia prostrata in Kyrgyzstan. Frunze, Kyrgyzstan. 1972.
  35. Gintzburger, G.; Toderich, K.N.; Mardonov, B.K.; Makhmudov, M.M. Rangelands of the Arid and Semi-Arid Zones in Uzbekistan; Centre de Cooperation Internationale en Resherche Agronomique pour le Development (CIRAD): Monpellier, France, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  36. Waldron, B.; Eun, J.; ZoBell, D.; Olson, K. Forage kochia (Kochia prostrata) for fall and winter grazing. Small Rumin. Res. 2010, 91, 47–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Karimi, G.; Ghorbanli, M.; Heidari, H.; Khavari Nejad, R.; Assareh, M. The effects of NaCl on growth, water relations, osmolytes and ion content in Kochia prostrata. Biol. Plant. 2005, 49, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Orlovsky, N.S.; Japakova, U.N.; Shulgina, I.; Volis, S. Comparative study of seed germination and growth of Kochia prostrata and Kochia scoparia (Chenopodiaceae) under salinity. J. Arid Environ. 2011, 75, 532–537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bailey, D.; Al Tabini, R.; Waldron, B.; Libbin, J.; Al-Khalidi Kh Alqadi, A.; Al Oun, M.; Jensen, K. Potential of Kochia prostrata and Perennial Grasses for Rangeland Restoration in Jordan. Rangel. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 63, 707–711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Malinovsky, A.V.; Akanov, E.N.; Voronin, P.Y. A Vegetation Climatic Unit for Studying the Impact on Higher Plants of an Increased CO2 Concentration in Comparison with the Atmospheric CO2 Concentration. Russ. J. Plant. Physiol. 2020, 67, 194–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Bates, L.S.; Waldren, R.P.; Teare, I.D. Rapid determination of free proline for water stress studies. Plant. Soil 1973, 39, 205–207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Klughammer, C.; Schreiber, U. Measuring P700 absorbance changes in the near infrared spectral region with a dual wavelength pulse modulation system. In Photosynthesis: Mechanisms and Effects; Garab, G., Ed.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 1998; pp. 4357–4360. [Google Scholar]
  43. Schreiber, U. Chlorophyll Fluorescence and Photosynthetic Energy Conversion: Simple Introductory Experiments with the TEACHING-PAM Chlorophyll Fluorometer; Heinz Walz GmbH: Effeltrich, Germany, 1997. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Dry biomass (a) and shoot length (b) of C4-species Kochia prostrata at different CO2 concentrations (400 and 800 ppm) under moderate (–0.6 MPa) polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced osmotic stress (Osm) and salinity (Salt) similar in osmotic potential (200 mM NaCl). The values are the means (±SE) of seven replicates. Different letters above the bars represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 (Tukey’s pairwise comparison). aCO2—ambient CO2 concentration; eCO2—elevated CO2 concentration.
Figure 1. Dry biomass (a) and shoot length (b) of C4-species Kochia prostrata at different CO2 concentrations (400 and 800 ppm) under moderate (–0.6 MPa) polyethylene glycol (PEG)-induced osmotic stress (Osm) and salinity (Salt) similar in osmotic potential (200 mM NaCl). The values are the means (±SE) of seven replicates. Different letters above the bars represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 (Tukey’s pairwise comparison). aCO2—ambient CO2 concentration; eCO2—elevated CO2 concentration.
Plants 10 00491 g001
Figure 2. Apparent photosynthesis (a), transpiration (b), dark respiration (c), and water-use efficiency (d) in plant leaves of C4 Kochia prostrata at different CO2 concentrations (400 and 800 ppm) under moderate (–0.6 MPa) PEG-induced osmotic stress (Osm) and salinity (Salt) similar in osmotic potential (200 mM NaCl). The values are means (±SE) of seven replicates. Different letters above the bars represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 (Tukey’s pairwise comparison). aCO2—ambient CO2 concentration; eCO2—elevated CO2 concentration.
Figure 2. Apparent photosynthesis (a), transpiration (b), dark respiration (c), and water-use efficiency (d) in plant leaves of C4 Kochia prostrata at different CO2 concentrations (400 and 800 ppm) under moderate (–0.6 MPa) PEG-induced osmotic stress (Osm) and salinity (Salt) similar in osmotic potential (200 mM NaCl). The values are means (±SE) of seven replicates. Different letters above the bars represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 (Tukey’s pairwise comparison). aCO2—ambient CO2 concentration; eCO2—elevated CO2 concentration.
Plants 10 00491 g002
Figure 3. Time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level under far-red light (PSI) (a), maximum quantum yield of PSII reaction (b), content of free proline (c) and content of Na+ (d) in plant leaves of C4 Kochia prostrata at different CO2 concentrations (400 and 800 ppm) under moderate (−0.6 MPa) PEG-induced osmotic stress (Osm) and salinity (Salt) similar in osmotic potential (200 mM NaCl). The values are means (±SE) of seven replicates. Different letters above the bars represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 (Tukey’s pairwise comparison). aCO2—ambient CO2 concentration; eCO2—elevated CO2 concentration.
Figure 3. Time required to reach the maximum P700 oxidation level under far-red light (PSI) (a), maximum quantum yield of PSII reaction (b), content of free proline (c) and content of Na+ (d) in plant leaves of C4 Kochia prostrata at different CO2 concentrations (400 and 800 ppm) under moderate (−0.6 MPa) PEG-induced osmotic stress (Osm) and salinity (Salt) similar in osmotic potential (200 mM NaCl). The values are means (±SE) of seven replicates. Different letters above the bars represent significant differences at the p < 0.05 (Tukey’s pairwise comparison). aCO2—ambient CO2 concentration; eCO2—elevated CO2 concentration.
Plants 10 00491 g003
Figure 4. Principle component analysis (PCA) (a) score plot of the physiological data of C4 Kochia prostrata at different CO2 concentrations (400 and 800 ppm) under moderate (–0.6 MPa) PEG-induced osmotic stress and salinity similar in osmotic potential (200 mM NaCl) and (b) multiple correlation of the physiological data of C4 Kochia prostrata. aCO2—ambient (400 ppm) CO2 concentration without treatment; aCO2 + Osm—ambient CO2 + PEG-induced osmotic stress; aCO2 + Salt—ambient CO2 + NaCl-induced salinity; eCO2—elevated (800 ppm) CO2 concentration; eCO2 + Osm—elevated CO2 + PEG-induced osmotic stress; eCO2 + Salt—elevated CO2 + NaCl-induced salinity. Parameters abbreviations are listed in table.
Figure 4. Principle component analysis (PCA) (a) score plot of the physiological data of C4 Kochia prostrata at different CO2 concentrations (400 and 800 ppm) under moderate (–0.6 MPa) PEG-induced osmotic stress and salinity similar in osmotic potential (200 mM NaCl) and (b) multiple correlation of the physiological data of C4 Kochia prostrata. aCO2—ambient (400 ppm) CO2 concentration without treatment; aCO2 + Osm—ambient CO2 + PEG-induced osmotic stress; aCO2 + Salt—ambient CO2 + NaCl-induced salinity; eCO2—elevated (800 ppm) CO2 concentration; eCO2 + Osm—elevated CO2 + PEG-induced osmotic stress; eCO2 + Salt—elevated CO2 + NaCl-induced salinity. Parameters abbreviations are listed in table.
Plants 10 00491 g004
Table 1. Factor loading of physiological parameters on axes 1 and 2 of the principal component analysis.
Table 1. Factor loading of physiological parameters on axes 1 and 2 of the principal component analysis.
ParametersPC1PC2
Photosystem II (PSII)−0.3219−0.3105
Photosystem I (PSI)−0.2527−0.1142
Shoot length (L)−0.36140.2312
Dry biomass (DW)−0.34450.3182
Water content (W)−0.2508−0.3807
Proline (Pro)0.15900.3675
Na+ ions (Na)−0.1063−0.3773
Apparent photosynthesis (A)−0.14800.2795
Transpiration (E)−0.26430.3570
Water-use efficiency (WUE)0.2540−0.0673
Dark respiration (Rd)0.31460.2831
The main significant factors are bold.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rakhmankulova, Z.; Shuyskaya, E.; Toderich, K.; Voronin, P. Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Improved C4 Xero-Halophyte Kochia prostrata Physiological Performance under Saline Conditions. Plants 2021, 10, 491. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10030491

AMA Style

Rakhmankulova Z, Shuyskaya E, Toderich K, Voronin P. Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Improved C4 Xero-Halophyte Kochia prostrata Physiological Performance under Saline Conditions. Plants. 2021; 10(3):491. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10030491

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rakhmankulova, Zulfira, Elena Shuyskaya, Kristina Toderich, and Pavel Voronin. 2021. "Elevated Atmospheric CO2 Concentration Improved C4 Xero-Halophyte Kochia prostrata Physiological Performance under Saline Conditions" Plants 10, no. 3: 491. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/plants10030491

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop