Next Article in Journal
Can Frequency Account for the Grammatical Choices of Children and Adults in Nominal Modification Contexts? Evidence from Elicited Production and Child-Directed Speech
Next Article in Special Issue
Strengthening L3 French Motivation: The Differential Impact of Vision-Enhancing Activities
Previous Article in Journal
Where Are the Goalposts? Generational Change in the Use of Grammatical Gender in Irish
Previous Article in Special Issue
Understanding High Performance in Late Second Language (L2) Acquisition—What Is the Secret? A Contrasting Case Study in L2 French
Review

Input Issues in the Development of L2 French Morphosyntax

Department of Multilingualism and Foreign Language Education, University of Fribourg, CH-1700 Fribourg, Switzerland
Received: 20 November 2020 / Revised: 13 February 2021 / Accepted: 16 February 2021 / Published: 23 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue The Acquisition of French as a Second Language)
The aim of this article is to discuss the role of input characteristics in the development of French verb morphology. From a usage-based perspective, several cognitive and linguistic factors contribute to the ease or difficulty of processing input in L2 acquisition. This article concentrates on frequency, salience, and form–function association, factors that might influence what aspects of input are available to the learners’ attention. A presentation of French verb morphology from this perspective shows how these factors can contribute to the use of the regular -er verb paradigm as a default. A review of empirical studies confirms the influence of input characteristics. The results suggest that the dominant pattern of regular verbs and the scarcity of salient clues from irregular verbs contribute to the specificity of L2 French development. The conclusion addresses the question of enriching L2 classroom input with irregular verbs. Such an input could facilitate the perception of form–function association, and thus, contribute to a more efficient development of French verb morphology. The article concludes by suggesting other ways of studying the influence of input as well as avenues for future research. View Full-Text
Keywords: input; SLA; French; morphosyntax; frequency; usage-based approaches input; SLA; French; morphosyntax; frequency; usage-based approaches
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Thomas, A. Input Issues in the Development of L2 French Morphosyntax. Languages 2021, 6, 34. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/languages6010034

AMA Style

Thomas A. Input Issues in the Development of L2 French Morphosyntax. Languages. 2021; 6(1):34. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/languages6010034

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thomas, Anita. 2021. "Input Issues in the Development of L2 French Morphosyntax" Languages 6, no. 1: 34. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/languages6010034

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop