Next Article in Journal
Validation of the HUMAC Balance System in Comparison with Conventional Force Plates
Next Article in Special Issue
Determining the Reliability of Several Consumer-Based Physical Activity Monitors
Previous Article in Journal
Feasibility Study of a Table Prototype Made of High-Performance Fiber-Reinforced Concrete
Previous Article in Special Issue
Oxide Thin-Film Transistors on Fibers for Smart Textiles
Article

Communication Challenges in on-Body and Body-to-Body Wearable Wireless Networks—A Connectivity Perspective

1
SERCOM Lab, Polytechnic School of Tunisia, University of Carthage, B.P. 743, 2078 La Marsa, Tunisia
2
Thomas Johann Seebeck Department of Electronics, Tallinn University of Technology, Ehitajate tee 5, 19086 Tallinn, Estonia
3
IRT SystemX, Building N3, 8 Avenue de la Vauve, CS 90070, 91127 Palaiseau, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 15 May 2017 / Revised: 29 June 2017 / Accepted: 30 June 2017 / Published: 6 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Wearable Technologies)
Wearable wireless networks (WWNs) offer innovative ways to connect humans and/or objects anywhere, anytime, within an infinite variety of applications. WWNs include three levels of communications: on-body, body-to-body and off-body communication. Successful communication in on-body and body-to-body networks is often challenging due to ultra-low power consumption, processing and storage capabilities, which have a significant impact on the achievable throughput and packet reception ratio as well as latency. Consequently, all these factors make it difficult to opt for an appropriate technology to optimize communication performance, which predominantly depends on the given application. In particular, this work emphasizes the impact of coarse-grain factors (such as dynamic and diverse mobility, radio-link and signal propagation, interference management, data dissemination schemes, and routing approaches) directly affecting the communication performance in WWNs. Experiments have been performed on a real testbed to investigate the connectivity behavior on two wireless communication levels: on-body and body-to-body. It is concluded that by considering the impact of above-mentioned factors, the general perception of using specific technologies may not be correct. Indeed, for on-body communication, by using the IEEE 802.15.6 standard (which is specifically designed for on-body communication), it is observed that while operating at low transmission power under realistic conditions, the connectivity can be significantly low, thus, the transmission power has to be tuned carefully. Similarly, for body-to-body communication in an indoor environment, WiFi IEEE 802.11n also has a high threshold of end-to-end disconnections beyond two hops (approximatively 25 m). Therefore, these facts promote the use of novel technologies such as 802.11ac, NarrowBand-IoT (NB-IoT) etc. as possible candidates for body-to-body communications as a part of the Internet of humans concept. View Full-Text
Keywords: wearable wireless networks (WWNs); on-body networks (BANs); body-to-body networks (BBNs); connectivity; disaster relief and emergency applications wearable wireless networks (WWNs); on-body networks (BANs); body-to-body networks (BBNs); connectivity; disaster relief and emergency applications
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Arbia, D.B.; Alam, M.M.; Moullec, Y.L.; Hamida, E.B. Communication Challenges in on-Body and Body-to-Body Wearable Wireless Networks—A Connectivity Perspective. Technologies 2017, 5, 43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/technologies5030043

AMA Style

Arbia DB, Alam MM, Moullec YL, Hamida EB. Communication Challenges in on-Body and Body-to-Body Wearable Wireless Networks—A Connectivity Perspective. Technologies. 2017; 5(3):43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/technologies5030043

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arbia, Dhafer B., Muhammad M. Alam, Yannick L. Moullec, and Elyes B. Hamida. 2017. "Communication Challenges in on-Body and Body-to-Body Wearable Wireless Networks—A Connectivity Perspective" Technologies 5, no. 3: 43. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/technologies5030043

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop