Next Article in Journal
Characterizing Mathematics Learning in Colombian Higher Distance Education
Next Article in Special Issue
Feasibility Study of Direct-on-Line Energy-Efficient Motors in a Pumping Unit, Considering Reactive Power Compensation
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Analysis and Optimization of Axial Flux Permanent Magnet Machine for Cogging Torque Reduction
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Single Inverter-Controlled Brushless Wound Field Synchronous Machine Topology

by
Syed Sabir Hussain Bukhari
1,2,
Ali Asghar Memon
3,
Sadjad Madanzadeh
2,
Ghulam Jawad Sirewal
4,
Jesús Doval-Gandoy
5 and
Jong-Suk Ro
2,6,*
1
Department of Electrical Engineering, Sukkur IBA University, Sukkur 65200, Sindh, Pakistan
2
School of Electrical and Electronics Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, Mehran University of Engineering and Technology, Jamshoro 76062, Sindh, Pakistan
4
Department of Electrical Engineering Technology, The Benazir Bhutto Shaheed University of Technology and Skill Development, Khairpur Mir’s 66020, Pakistan
5
Applied Power Electronics Technology Research Group, University of Vigo, 36310 Vigo, Spain
6
Department of Intelligent Energy and Industry, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 06974, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 4 July 2021 / Revised: 19 July 2021 / Accepted: 21 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021

Abstract

:
This paper proposes a novel brushless excitation topology for a three-phase synchronous machine based on a customary current-controlled voltage source inverter (VSI). The inverter employs a simple hysteresis-controller-based current control scheme that enables it to inject a three-phase armature current to the stator winding which contains a dc offset. This dc offset generates an additional air gap magneto-motive force (MMF). On the rotor side, an additional harmonic winding is mounted to harness the harmonic power from the air gap flux. Since a third harmonic flux is generated in this type of topology, the machine structure is also modified to accommodate the third harmonic rotor winding to have a voltage induced as the rotor rotates at synchronous speed. Specifically, four-pole armature and field winding patterns are used, whereas the harmonic winding is configured for a twelve-pole pattern. A diode rectifier is also mounted on the rotor between the harmonic and field windings. Therefore, the generated voltage on the harmonic winding feeds the current to the field winding for excitation. A 2D-finite element analysis (FEA) in JMAG-Designer was carried out for performance evaluation and verification of the topology. The simulation results are consistent with the proposed theory. The topology could reduce the cost and stator winding volume compared to a conventional brushless machine, with good potential for various applications.

1. Introduction

High cost of rare earth magnets and flux control method complexity in permanent magnet synchronous machines (PMSMs) are serious problems in making the PMSM suitable for many applications [1]. However, alternatives such as wound field synchronous machines (WFSMs) can be used in a variety of applications ranging from small capacity motors to large capacity power generation applications [1,2,3]. In [2], it was specifically investigated for use in automotive driving compared to permanent magnet excited machines. Given the potential in WFSM, due to its low-price benefit, an inherent problem of its assembly of brushes and slip rings must be solved for comparison. In small capacity applications, operating it without brushes and slip rings will be convenient [3,4,5,6,7].
In [8], utilizing space harmonics power, a brushless WFSM was designed with an additional winding on the rotor. The additional rotor winding in that case will retrieve the space harmonics power and feed a current to the field winding of the machine as a voltage source, removing the need for any external dc power source for excitation. A similar approach has been explored in [9] to design a brushless WFSM using space harmonics for excitation.
In [10], a self-excited brushless synchronous generator was designed and investigated to utilize the fifth space harmonic of armature MMF to excite main field winding in a cylindrical rotor design.
In [11,12], brushless excitation was achieved by injecting a third harmonic in the same armature windings to create a harmonic air gap flux for rotor excitation. In a similar attempt, an additional winding on the stator was used for more controllability of the harmonics in [13].
In [14], to reduce the components, a thyristor-generated harmonic current was used to feed and control the current, employing an additional harmonic winding on the stator with a similar machine structure as in [13]. However, these brushless machines have some disadvantages, such as high stator/rotor winding or core volume compared to a benchmark machine. Otherwise, the machine performance is not comparable to a conventional PMSM or WFSM.
However, recently new topologies have been designed and investigated to solve the remaining problems in the brushless excitation of WFSMs [15,16,17,18].
In [15], stator armature winding was connected in such a way that the three phase armature winding terminals were connected to an exciter winding mounted on the stator through diode rectifier. This topology will generate two types of fluxes in the air gap creating both the fundamental and harmonic flux through single power supply. However, it is limited to small scales due to load insensitivity and unwanted harmonics.
In [16,17], stator armature winding was connected in such a way that the ampere-turns resulting from supplying current were unequal in two portions of the machine structure. This attempt results in sub-harmonic air gap flux in addition to the fundamental flux.
In all these types of machines, the additional flux is generally created to be induced in a rotor harmonic winding which acts as power source for the field winding excitation. However, changing the conventional winding connection patterns generally results in unwanted harmonics along with the desired harmonic frequencies.
Recently, a brushless WFSM based on a single rectifier is proposed in [18]. This topology is presented in Figure 1. The proposed WFSM is based on two power sources. One is directly connected to the main armature winding, whereas the second power source is connected to the three-phase rectifier whose output is connected to the neutral point of the armature winding which is Y-connected. This results in a dc offset for the armature currents which generates a third harmonic air gap flux. The rotor harmonic winding harnesses the third harmonic power from the air gap flux for brushless operation.
In this paper, a dc offset for the armature winding currents, previously realized using two power sources in [18], is produced using a single customary current-controlled voltage source inverter (CCVSI). The inverter operation is based on a simple and easy to implement current control scheme. This control scheme involves a hysteresis controller that enables it to generate three-phase currents for the stator winding which contains a dc offset for each phase. The magnitude of the dc offset can be varied by varying the reference currents of the controller. This dc offset generates an additional air gap MMF which produces a third harmonic air gap flux. The generated flux is intercepted by the rotor harmonic winding wound along with the field winding for brushless excitation. In the proposed WFSM topology, the conventional armature winding is exploited to reduce any additional unwanted harmonics which can reduce the machine performance. In addition, the proposed topology requires a single customary CCVSI employing a simple control scheme, which makes it cost-effective compared to the brushless WFSM topology presented in [18]. The proposed inverter topology and its operating principle are discussed in subsequent sections. Finite element analysis (FEA) in JMAG-Designer 19.1 is employed to validate the proposed topology and achieve its electromagnetic performance.

2. Proposed Inverter Topology

A simplified representation of the proposed brushless WFSM topology, in which the inverter generates an armature current with a dc offset for the stator winding of the machine, is presented in Figure 2. The armature winding in the proposed brushless WFSM is connected to the customary three-phase, two-level, current-controlled voltage source inverter. The rotor of the machine has harmonic and field windings connected through a rotating diode rectifier. The comprehensive illustration of the proposed topology is shown in Figure 3a, in which the inverter uses a control scheme for the required commutation of the inverter which switches based on a typical hysteresis controller. The employed hysteresis controller controls the phase currents of the armature winding with a specific hysteresis band over the given reference current signals. The controlled output currents with the required dc offset, which essentially contain the fundamental and the bias/dc current components, are given to the armature winding of the machine. Consequently, the proposed inverter topology involves two dc sources connected in series as shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3a. The coupling point of the dc source is connected to the neutral point of the Y-connected armature winding of the machine. The switching potentials of the inverter switches are used to decide the bandwidth of the current controllers. The reference current signals i*a, i*b, and i*c used for the employed hysteresis current control scheme are generated through the following equation:
i a * = I sin ( ω t ) + I b i a s i b * = I sin ( ω t 2 π 3 ) + I b i a s i c * = I sin ( ω t + 2 π 3 ) + I b i a s
Figure 3b shows the reference and controlled inverter output currents for phase A of the proposed inverter topology. In the given figure, the black color waveform represents the reference signal, whereas the red color waveform denotes the inverter output current. Figure 3c illustrates the three-phase input armature currents, which produces the following neutral current:
I N = i a + i b + i c = 3 I b i a s
The generalized voltage equation for the armature winding is as follows:
v x = R i x + L d i x d t
where x ϵ{a, b, c}, vx, and ix represent the proposed CCVSI output voltage and current, respectively. R and L represent the armature winding resistance and inductance of the machine.

3. Machine Topology and Working Principle

The input armature currents (iabc) generated through the method discussed in Section 2 are given to the machine’s armature winding. A 4-pole, 42-slot (4p42s) machine with a concentrated, double-layered armature winding, which has a winding factor of 0.932, is employed to validate the proposed brushless WFSM topology. The employed machine along with its stator and rotor winding configurations are shown in Figure 4a,b, respectively. As seen from Figure 4b, the rotor of the machine has four main teeth to accommodate the four-pole rotor field winding, whereas each main tooth is further altered to have two sub-teeth to house the rotor harmonic winding. The rotor harmonic winding is based on a twelve-pole winding configuration to harness the harmonic power generated in the air gap flux. The detailed winding specifications are presented in Table 1.
The operation of the proposed brushless WFSM topology is investigated considering four different cases, each is based on the supply of input armature currents (iabc) with a different magnitude of dc offset/bias. In case 1 and 2, the armature winding is supplied with currents having a dc offset of 0.6 A and 1.2 A for each phase, respectively. However, a dc offset of 1.8 A and 2.4 A is achieved for the stator armature currents of the employed machine in case 3 and 4, respectively. The input armature currents during all operating conditions, i.e., case 1 to 4, are presented in Figure 5a–d.
These currents produce a magnetomotive force (F) for each phase of the armature currents, as given under:
F a = i a N φ 1 ( sin θ s + 1 3 sin 3 θ s ) F b = i b N φ 1 sin ( θ s 2 π 3 ) + 1 3 sin 3 θ s F c = i c N φ 1 sin ( θ s + 2 π 3 ) + 1 3 sin 3 θ s
In the above equation
N φ 1 = 2 π ( p e r     p h a s e     n u m b e r     o f     t u r n s )
θs = electrical angle (spatial), and
ω = angular frequency (electrical).
The controlled armature winding currents can be expressed as:
i a = I 1 sin ( ω t ) + I b i a s i b = I 1 sin ( ω t 2 π 3 ) + I b i a s i c = I 1 sin ( ω t + 2 π 3 ) + I b i a s
where I1 is the fundamental and Ibias is the magnitude of the dc offset for the armature winding currents for each phase.
Bring Equation (5) to Equation (4), and add the MMF of three-phase armature windings a, b, and c. The net MMF (Fabc) of the armature winding is expressed as:
F a b c ( θ s , i ) = F a + F b + F c
F a b c ( θ s , i ) = N φ 1 { sin ( θ s ) + 1 3 sin 3 θ s } I 1 sin ( ω t ) + I b i a s + N φ 1 { sin ( θ s 2 π 3 ) + 1 3 sin 3 θ s } I 1 sin ( ω t 2 π 3 ) + I b i a s + N φ 1 { sin ( θ s + 2 π 3 ) + 1 3 sin 3 θ s } I 1 sin ( ω t + 2 π 3 ) + I b i a s
F a b c ( θ s , i ) = N φ 1 I 1 sin ( ω t ) sin ( θ s ) + sin ( ω t 2 π 3 ) sin ( θ s 2 π 3 ) + sin ( ω t + 2 π 3 ) sin ( θ s + 2 π 3 ) + 3 I b i a s
F a b c ( θ s , i ) = 3 2 I 1 N φ 1 cos ( ω t θ s ) + 3 I b i a s
The above equation shows that Fabc consists of the normal fundamental MMF rotating at synchronous speed and the spatial-location-fixed MMF generated by the dc offset component of the armature currents. These two fields are not coupled due to the difference of frequencies.
If the rotor rotates at synchronous speed, the fundamental component of MMF will not produce any EMF in the harmonic winding of the rotor as the speed of the rotor and the fundamental MMF is same; however, the stationary MMF component caused by the dc offset component of the armature currents will induce a rotating EMF and transformer action-based EMF in the harmonic winding of the rotor.
Assuming that θ0 is the rotor excitation winding initial position angle, the spatial position of the excitation winding can be calculated as:
θ s = ω t + θ 0
The generated flux of each winding pole will be:
ψ h = n h P g N φ 1 3 2 I 1 cos ( ω t θ s ) + 3 I b i a s
where nh is the rotor excitation winding number of turns, and Pg is the air gap permeance.
The magnitude of the induced EMF in the rotor harmonic winding can be calculated as:
e h = 6 d ψ h d t e h = 18 n h P g N φ 1 I b i a s ω cos ( 3 ω t + 3 θ 0 )
From Equation (12), it can be seen that the induced EMF in the harmonic winding of the rotor is three times as much as the synchronous angular frequency. The induced EMF (eh) in the rotor harmonic winding is rectified by a rotating rectifier to supply dc to the rotor field winding to archive brushless operation for WFSM [19,20].

4. Finite Element Analysis

To validate the proposed single inverter-controlled brushless WFSM topology, finite element analysis (FEA) was carried out in JMAG-Designer. The electromagnetic performance of the proposed topology was achieved by developing a 4-pole, 42-slot machine as presented in Figure 4. The machine was investigated under four different operating conditions i.e., case 1, case 2, case 3, and case 4. In case 1 and 2, the armature currents had a dc offset of 0.6 A and 1.2 A for each phase, respectively. However, a dc offset of 1.8 A and 2.4 A was achieved for the armature currents in case 3 and 4. The input armature currents under these cases are shown in Figure 5a–d and the machine specifications are presented in Table 2.
The machine was operated at a speed of 1800 rpm. The simulations of the proposed brushless WFSM were carried out for 0.6 s. The flux linkages of the machine under all four cases are shown in Figure 6a–d. Fast Fourier transform (FFT) plots for phase A of these flux linkages were carried out to show its harmonic contents. The FFT plots for the flux linkages of the machine under the investigated operating cases are presented in Figure 7a–d. These figures show that a considerable magnitude of third harmonic is present in the flux linkages produced by rotating the shaft of the machine at synchronous speed and the armature currents generated through the proposed CCVSI. Figure 8a–d show the magnetic field density plot of the machine under the investigated operating cases. These plots show that the operation of the machine is under the saturation level of 1.6 T in case 1, 1.7 T in case 2 and 3, and 1.8 T in case 4.
The third harmonic flux induces the harmonic current in the twelve-pole rotor harmonic winding, which is rectified through a diode rectifier to excite the rotor field winding. The induced harmonic and rectified field currents of the employed machine under investigated operating cases are shown in Figure 9a–d.
A four-pole rotor field can get locked with the four-pole main stator field and develop torque. In case 1 and 2, the magnitude of the average torque generated through the proposed brushless WFSM topology is 3.198 Nm and 5.252 Nm, respectively. However, in case 3 and 4, the magnitude of the average torque is 6.4478 Nm and 7.2367 Nm. The output torque of the machine under the investigated operating cases is shown in Figure 10a–d. The magnitude of the generated output torque and its torque ripple during the investigated operating conditions are presented in Table 3. From the table, it can be seen that as the magnitude of the dc offset increases, the average torque of the machine increases. However, the torque ripple also increases. It is because the increase in the magnitude of the dc offset increases the additional harmonics in the machine air gap.
The torque ripple of the machine can be minimized by using parametric optimization techniques and skewing.

No-Load Analysis

To examine the operation of the machine used to validate the proposed single inverter-controlled brushless WFSM topology under no-load condition, no load analysis of the machine was carried out in JMAG-Designer. The machine was provided with a field current of 1 A dc and was operated at 1800 rpm. The flux linkage of the machine under such conditions is presented in Figure 11a, whereas the magnetic flux density plot is presented in Figure 11b. A back-EMF of 76.671 Vrms was generated in the stator winding of the machine and is presented in Figure 12a. To show the harmonics present in the induced back-EMF, a FFT plot of the back-EMF was generated and is shown in Figure 12b. The cogging torque of the machine is 0.04 Nm (peak-to-peak). The generated cogging torque is presented in Figure 13. The no-load analysis results are presented in Table 4.

5. Conclusions

This paper proposes and investigates a single inverter-controlled brushless WFSM topology in which the inverter injects a three-phase armature current having a dc offset. In this arrangement, the volume of the machine can be reduced compared to a conventional brushless WFSM where an additional winding is used on the stator for excitation purpose. In addition, the proposed topology uses a single inverter and a simple current control strategy which makes it cost-effective compared to the brushless WFSM topologies of same kind. In particular, a 4-pole, 42-slot machine was used to simulate in JMAG for performance evaluation and verification of the working principle. The results show that a significant amount of torque is produced with the proposed brushless WFSM topology. This conclusion is, however, only based on the verification of the topology with reference to its working principle. The performance can be enhanced with an improved machine structure and optimized for various applications.
The limitation of the proposed single inverter controlled brushless WFSM topology includes the selection of the magnitude of dc offset for armature currents within a limit which may never cause any saturation for the stator and rotor cores.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.S.H.B. and J.D.-G.; software, S.S.H.B. and G.J.S.; formal analysis, S.S.H.B. and S.M.; writing—original draft preparation, S.S.H.B. and A.A.M.; funding acquisition, J.-S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the Brain Pool (BP) Program funded by the Ministry of Science and ICT through the National Research Foundation of Korea (2019H1D3A1A01102988), the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea funded by the Ministry of Education (2016R1D1A1B01008058), and the Human Resources Development (No.20204030200090) of the Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP) grant funded by the Korea government Ministry of Trade, Industry and Energy.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lipo, T.A.; Du, Z.S. Synchronous motor drives-a forgotten option. In Proceedings of the 2015 International Aegean Conference on Electrical Machines & Power Electronics (ACEMP), 2015 International Conference on Optimization of Electrical & Electronic Equipment (OPTIM) & 2015 International Symposium on Advanced Electromechanical Motion Systems (ELECTROMOTION), Side, Turkey, 2–4 September 2015; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  2. Dorrell, D. Are wound-rotor synchronous motors suitable for use in high efficiency torque-dense automotive drives? In Proceedings of the IECON 2012—38th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Montreal, QC, Canada, 25–28 October 2012; pp. 4880–4885. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zhu, S.; Liu, C.; Wang, K.; Hu, Y. The novel brushless excitation methods for wound rotor excitation synchronous generators. In Proceedings of the 2016 Eleventh International Conference on Ecological Vehicles and Renewable Energies (EVER), Monte Carlo, Monaco, 6–8 April 2016; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kano, Y. Design optimization of brushless synchronous machines with wound-field excitation for hybrid electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Montreal, QC, Canada, 20–24 September 2015; pp. 2769–2775. [Google Scholar]
  5. Di Gioia, A.; Brown, I.P.; Nie, Y.; Knippel, R.; Ludois, D.C.; Dai, J.; Hagen, S.; Alteheld, C. Design of a wound field synchronous machine for electric vehicle traction with brushless capacitive field excitation. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Milwaukee, WI, USA, 18–22 September 2016; pp. 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  6. An, Q.; Gao, X.; Yao, F.; Sun, L.; Lipo, T. The structure optimization of novel harmonic current excited brushless synchronous machines based on open winding pattern. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 14–18 September 2014; pp. 1754–1761. [Google Scholar]
  7. Sun, L.; Gao, X.; Yao, F.; An, Q.; Lipo, T. A new type of harmonic current excited brushless synchronous machine based on an open winding pattern. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition (ECCE), Pittsburgh, PA, USA, 14–18 September 2014; pp. 2366–2373. [Google Scholar]
  8. Aoyama, M.; Noguchi, T. Rare-earth free motor with field poles excited by space harmonics current phase-torque characteristics of self-excitation synchronous motor. In Proceedings of the 2013 International Conference on Renewable Energy Research and Applications (ICRERA), Madrid, Spain, 20–23 October 2013; pp. 149–154. [Google Scholar]
  9. Dajaku, G.; Gerling, D. New self-excited synchronous machine with tooth concentrated winding. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Electric Drives Production Conference (EDPC-2013), Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany, 29–30 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  10. Inoue, K.; Yamashita, H.; Nakamae, E.; Fujikawa, T. A brushless self-exciting three-phase synchronous generator utilizing the 5th-space harmonic component of magneto motive force through armature currents. IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. 1992, 7, 517–524. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yao, F.; An, Q.; Gao, X.; Sun, L.; Lipo, T.A. Principle of operation and performance of a synchronous machine employing a new harmonic excitation scheme. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2015, 51, 3890–3898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Jawad, G.; Ali, Q.; Lipo, T.A.; Kwon, B.-I. Novel brushless wound rotor synchronous machine with zero-sequence third-harmonic field excitation. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2016, 52, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yao, F.; An, Q.-T.; Sun, L.; Lipo, T.A. Performance investigation of a brushless synchronous machine with additional harmonic field windings. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2016, 63, 6756–6766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Sirewal, G.J.; Ayub, M.; Atiq, S.; Kwon, B.-I. Analysis of a brushless wound rotor synchronous machine employing a stator harmonic winding. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 151392–151402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bukhari, S.S.H.; Sirewal, G.J.; Ayub, M.; Ro, J.-S. A New small-scale self-excited wound rotor synchronous motor topology. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2021, 57, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ayub, M.; Jawad, G.; Kwon, B.-I. Consequent-pole hybrid excitation brushless wound field synchronous machine with fractional slot concentrated winding. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2019, 55, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Ayub, M.; Hussain, A.; Jawad, G.; Kwon, B.-I. Brushless operation of a wound-field synchronous machine using a novel winding scheme. IEEE Trans. Magn. 2019, 55, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bukhari, S.S.H.; Ahmad, H.; Sirewal, G.J.; Ro, J.-S. Simplified brushless wound field synchronous machine topology based on a three-phase rectifier. IEEE Access 2021, 9, 8637–8648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bukhari, S.S.H.; Ahmad, H.; Chachar, F.A.; Ro, J.-S. Brushless field-excitation method for wound-rotor synchronous machines. Int. Trans. Electr. Energy Syst. 2021, 31, e12961. [Google Scholar]
  20. Ayub, M.; Bukhari, S.S.H.; Sirewal, G.J.; Arif, A.; Kwon, B.-I. Utilization of reluctance torque for improvement of the starting and average torques of a brushless wound field synchronous machine. Electr. Eng. 2021, 103. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Conventional three-phase rectifier-based brushless WFSM topology.
Figure 1. Conventional three-phase rectifier-based brushless WFSM topology.
Mathematics 09 01739 g001
Figure 2. Simplified diagram of the proposed brushless WFSM drive topology.
Figure 2. Simplified diagram of the proposed brushless WFSM drive topology.
Mathematics 09 01739 g002
Figure 3. (a) Proposed inverter topology, (b) reference and controlled output current for phase A, and (c) controlled three-phase output currents of the inverter.
Figure 3. (a) Proposed inverter topology, (b) reference and controlled output current for phase A, and (c) controlled three-phase output currents of the inverter.
Mathematics 09 01739 g003
Figure 4. (a) Machine model with stator winding and (b) rotor winding configurations.
Figure 4. (a) Machine model with stator winding and (b) rotor winding configurations.
Mathematics 09 01739 g004
Figure 5. Armature winding currents with (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase.
Figure 5. Armature winding currents with (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase.
Mathematics 09 01739 g005
Figure 6. Flux linkages of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Figure 6. Flux linkages of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Mathematics 09 01739 g006
Figure 7. FFT of flux linkages of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Figure 7. FFT of flux linkages of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Mathematics 09 01739 g007aMathematics 09 01739 g007b
Figure 8. Magnetic field density plots of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Figure 8. Magnetic field density plots of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Mathematics 09 01739 g008
Figure 9. Rotor currents of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Figure 9. Rotor currents of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Mathematics 09 01739 g009
Figure 10. Output torque of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Figure 10. Output torque of the machine having (a) 0.6 A, (b) 1.2 A, (c) 1.8 A, and (d) 2.4 A dc offset for each phase of armature currents.
Mathematics 09 01739 g010
Figure 11. (a) Flux linkage and (b) magnetic flux density plot.
Figure 11. (a) Flux linkage and (b) magnetic flux density plot.
Mathematics 09 01739 g011
Figure 12. (a) Back-EMF of the employed machine and (b) its FFT plot.
Figure 12. (a) Back-EMF of the employed machine and (b) its FFT plot.
Mathematics 09 01739 g012
Figure 13. Cogging torque.
Figure 13. Cogging torque.
Mathematics 09 01739 g013
Table 1. Winding parameters for the employed machine.
Table 1. Winding parameters for the employed machine.
ParameterValue
Number of poles/slots/layers4/42/2
Coil span9 slots
Pole pitch10.5 slots
Periodicities2
Winding factor0.932
Table 2. Machine specifications.
Table 2. Machine specifications.
ParameterValue
Rated power1 kW
Machine poles/Stator slots4/42
Rated speed1800 rpm
Frequency60 Hz
Stator outer/inner diameter88.5/50 mm
Air gap0.5 mm
Rotor diameter49.5 mm
Rotor main/sub-teeth4/8
Harmonic/Field winding number of turns9/150
Armature winding number of turns20
Stack length80 mm
Table 3. Comparative performance analysis.
Table 3. Comparative performance analysis.
AttributeCase 1Case 2Case 3Case 4
Average output torque (in Nm)3.19805.25206.44787.2367
Torque ripple (in %)60.9765.68971.34276
Maximum torque (in Nm)4.367.258.8510.15
Table 4. No-load analysis.
Table 4. No-load analysis.
AttributeCase 4
Back-EMF (in Vrms)76.671
Cogging torque (in peak-to-peak Nm)0.04
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Bukhari, S.S.H.; Memon, A.A.; Madanzadeh, S.; Sirewal, G.J.; Doval-Gandoy, J.; Ro, J.-S. Novel Single Inverter-Controlled Brushless Wound Field Synchronous Machine Topology. Mathematics 2021, 9, 1739. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9151739

AMA Style

Bukhari SSH, Memon AA, Madanzadeh S, Sirewal GJ, Doval-Gandoy J, Ro J-S. Novel Single Inverter-Controlled Brushless Wound Field Synchronous Machine Topology. Mathematics. 2021; 9(15):1739. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9151739

Chicago/Turabian Style

Bukhari, Syed Sabir Hussain, Ali Asghar Memon, Sadjad Madanzadeh, Ghulam Jawad Sirewal, Jesús Doval-Gandoy, and Jong-Suk Ro. 2021. "Novel Single Inverter-Controlled Brushless Wound Field Synchronous Machine Topology" Mathematics 9, no. 15: 1739. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/math9151739

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop