Next Article in Journal
Mind–Body Therapy for Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
Next Article in Special Issue
An Evaluation of a Continuing Education Program for Family Caregivers of Ventilator-Dependent Children with Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)
Previous Article in Journal
Parent, partner, co-parent or partnership? The need for clarity as family systems thinking takes hold in the quest to motivate behavioural change
Previous Article in Special Issue
Pressure Injuries in Medically Complex Children: A Review
Review

Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy

Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, OH 45229, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: David Hall
Received: 5 March 2017 / Revised: 18 April 2017 / Accepted: 19 April 2017 / Published: 24 April 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Children with Complex Health Care Needs)
Cerebral palsy (CP) is the most common physical disability in childhood. CP comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders that can result in spasticity, dystonia, muscle contractures, weakness and coordination difficulty that ultimately affects the ability to control movements. Traditionally, CP has been classified using a combination of the motor type and the topographical distribution, as well as subjective severity level. Imprecise terms such as these tell very little about what a person is able to do functionally and can impair clear communication between providers. More recently, classification systems have been created employing a simple ordinal grading system of functional performance. These systems allow a more precise discussion between providers, as well as better subject stratification for research. The goal of this review is to describe four common functional classification systems for cerebral palsy: the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS), the Manual Ability Classification System (MACS), the Communication Function Classification System (CFCS), and the Eating and Drinking Ability Classification System (EDACS). These measures are all standardized, reliable, and complementary to one another. View Full-Text
Keywords: cerebral palsy; classification; severity; function; GMFCS; MACS; CFCS; EDACS cerebral palsy; classification; severity; function; GMFCS; MACS; CFCS; EDACS
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Paulson, A.; Vargus-Adams, J. Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy. Children 2017, 4, 30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children4040030

AMA Style

Paulson A, Vargus-Adams J. Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy. Children. 2017; 4(4):30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children4040030

Chicago/Turabian Style

Paulson, Andrea, and Jilda Vargus-Adams. 2017. "Overview of Four Functional Classification Systems Commonly Used in Cerebral Palsy" Children 4, no. 4: 30. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children4040030

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop