Next Article in Journal
In-Silico Evaluation of Anthropomorphic Measurement Variations on Electrical Cardiometry in Neonates
Previous Article in Journal
Amblyopia and Routine Eye Exam in Children: Parent’s Perspective
Previous Article in Special Issue
Human Milk, More Than Simple Nourishment
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Healthy Habits and Emotional Balance in Women during the Postpartum Period: Differences between Term and Preterm Delivery

1
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, C/Arzobispo Morcillo, 2, 28029 Madrid, Spain
2
Food, Oxidative Stress and Cardiovascular Health (FOSCH) Multidisciplinary Research Team, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Ciudad Universitaria de Cantoblanco, 28049 Madrid, Spain
3
Division of Neonatology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), C/Profesor Martin Lagos s/n, 28040 Madrid, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 September 2021 / Revised: 14 October 2021 / Accepted: 16 October 2021 / Published: 18 October 2021

Abstract

:
Breastfeeding could be considered as a vulnerable period, rising the risk to shift from optimism to pessimism. Preterm delivery is an event that increases postpartum maternal stress and depression, which can have a negative impact on breastfeeding and maternal–filial wellbeing. The adherence to healthy habits may have a positive influence on this vulnerable population. We aimed to analyze the impact of prematurity on maternal psychological aspects during postpartum and to study if adherence to the Healthy Food Pyramid influences psychological variables. Fifty-five breastfeeding women being attended in the Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid, Spain) were recruited during the first day postpartum. The medical data were collected from the obstetrical records. The women answered an auto-administered questionnaire with several sections: sociodemographic characteristics, Perceived Stress Scale (PSS), and Life Orientation Test (LOT), at 14 days and 6 months postpartum, Adherence to the Healthy Food Pyramid Questionnaire (AP-Q) at 28 days postpartum and the Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) at 6 months postpartum. The PSS and LOT scores were not statistically different in mothers with preterm compared to term delivery either at 14 days or at 6 months postpartum. Longitudinally, the PSS did not show significant differences, but the LOT score was lower at 6 months compared to 14 days postpartum (p-Value = 0.046). A higher EPDS score was significantly found in mothers with preterm delivery (9.0 ± 4.7) than those with a term delivery (5.4 ± 4.2; p-value = 0.040). A significant and positive correlation was observed between the AP-Q score and LOT both at 14 days and 6 months postpartum. Conclusively, maternal optimism decreases during the postpartum period, women with preterm delivery being at risk of postpartum depression. Furthermore, there is a relationship between optimism and adherence to healthy habits. Healthcare professional counseling is essential during the entire breastfeeding period, particularly in vulnerable mothers with preterm delivery.

1. Introduction

Pregnancy, childbirth, and breastfeeding are important events for women that involve physical and psychosocial changes. During these life stages, women may become more susceptible to stressful stimuli, modifying their anxiety threshold. After pregnancy, body and hormonal changes, together with taking care of herself, the challenge of breastfeeding and care for the newborn, alterations in the sleep cycle, or even lack of socio-instrumental support, may increase work–life conflicts, predisposing to a higher risk of disrupting the maternal emotional balance [1,2]. Among the possible psycho-emotional changes associated with pregnancy and breastfeeding are stress and depression. In addition, breastfeeding is a vulnerable period for shifting from optimism to pessimism, and vice versa [3].
Based on evidence related to the benefits of breastfeeding for infant and maternal health, the World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that infants be exclusively breastfed for the first six months of life [4,5]. However, added to the new maternity role and physical changes of the mother, it could also be a source of extra stress for women [6]. Breastfeeding difficulties such as delayed let-down milk, mastitis, poor latching of the newborn, pain, cracks, and women’s high expectations about breastfeeding before delivery may increase the risk of psycho-emotional disturbances [3]. These difficulties can lead to early breastfeeding cessation.
Furthermore, early cessation of breastfeeding can negatively influence the physical [7] and psychological health of women [8,9]. A positive psychological impact on the mother during breastfeeding has been reported, increasing her well-being, self-esteem, and her interaction with the newborn [10,11,12,13,14]. Therefore, breastfeeding may have a beneficial effect on the course of postpartum depression [6,15]. Accordingly, the promotion of breastfeeding and postpartum maternal care would be an important health intervention to decrease infant morbidity and mortality rate and to improve maternal mental health [16].
The task is to recognize mothers at risk of early breastfeeding cessation who may need additional support. In this regard, nursing care is fundamental in the prevention of early breastfeeding cessation and mood disorders [17,18]. Mothers with weakened emotional health are less likely to achieve successful exclusive breastfeeding [19,20], being a target population. Knowing how maternal stress, postpartum depression, and optimism vary throughout lactation would allow improved guidance for effective breastfeeding and maternal mental health interventions by nursing professionals.
One of the vulnerable populations is women with preterm delivery (birth < 37 weeks of gestation), which is a serious health problem worldwide. In addition to the well-known problem of the increased risk of infant morbidities, preterm delivery also rises postpartum maternal stress [6,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28]. The mother may be intimidated by the hostile environment of the neonatal care units, and with neonatal clinical protocols [25,26,27]. These sources of stress can undermine maternal mental health triggering the development of postpartum depression [6,29]. Postpartum depression can alter maternal behavior, maternal–filial bonding, and have a negative impact on breastfeeding and infant health [6]. It has been demonstrated that maternal psychological aspects influence breastfeeding patterns [3]. Regarding infant health, postpartum depression has been related with emotional and behavioral problems during infant development [6,15]. There are numerous risk factors associated with postpartum depression, such as low optimism and life satisfaction, mood disturbances, marital conflict, financial issues, lack of social support, and obstetric outcomes [23,24,30]. The psychological aspects during postpartum can also modulate healthy habits, such as diet and physical activity. During lactation, women’s nutritional requirements increase in quantity and quality [31,32]. Although the maintenance of a healthy diet during lactation seems to be widely known, in many countries, malnutrition by excess is common [32,33]. Several studies have shown that eating healthy, being physically active, and breastfeeding can be of great help to a new mother’s physiological and psychological health. However, the adherence to fruit and vegetable intake recommendations and physical activity adapted to their stage of the life cycle is low [34]. Women need greater access to education and resources related to healthy eating and physical activity during breastfeeding. This information should come from healthcare professionals and not from the internet [34,35]. Furthermore, it has been demonstrated that a Mediterranean diet protects against depression and mood disorders, also reducing their intensity [36,37].
Healthcare professionals can play an important role in both the psychological reinforcement and follow-up of lifestyle habits and nutrition in potentially vulnerable breastfeeding mothers. Therefore, our aims were to analyze the influence of prematurity on the maternal psychological aspects during the postpartum period and if adherence to the Healthy Food Pyramid (HFP) exerts an influence on psychological variables.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Study Design and Participants Recruitment

The population was recruited at the neonatal intensive care unit and Obstetrics and Gynecology Service of Hospital Clínico San Carlos (HCSC, Madrid, Spain). This study was approved by the HCSC Ethical Committee (Ref. 19/393-E). Recruitment took place between October 2019 and July 2020. The inclusion criteria were women who maintained breastfeeding during the 1st month postpartum, willingness to participate in the study, and good comprehension of the Spanish language. The exclusion criterion was prior diagnoses of mood disorders, because it increases the odds of postpartum depression [38].
Fifty-five breastfeeding mothers voluntary agreed to be incorporate in the study and signed the informed consent. Each participant completed a single auto-administrated questionnaire comprising five sections: (1) sociodemographic items, including maternal age; origin (Spanish or non-Spanish); educational level; employment status (maternity leave, housewife, and unemployed were classified as others); family core; and family size; (2) Perceived Stress Scale (PSS); (3) Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS); (4) Life Orientation Test (LOT); and (5) Adherence to the HFP Questionnaire (AP-Q). The chronograph of the questionnaire response is shown in Figure 1. The medical data were collected from the obstetrical records, which included gestational age (weeks); gravida; type of reproduction (spontaneous versus assisted reproduction techniques); type of delivery (vaginal versus C-section); type of gestation (single versus twin); and diagnoses of obstetric complications according to HCSC protocols (gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and preeclampsia).

2.2. Psychological Instruments

Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) [39]. For the present study, the Spanish version of the PSS was used, which showed a reliability of 0.82 in the preliminary studies [40]. The 10-item Likert scale (0-4) of the Cohen PSS was used to measure maternal stress. The questionnaire assesses whether the mother felt nervous and stressed in the last month, unable to cope, or confident in her ability to deal with personal problems. After reverse-scoring items 4, 5, 7, and 8, the total score was divided by 10. The PSS score was interpreted as the higher the score, the greater the stress. PSS is not a diagnostic tool, so there is no predefined threshold [41]. In our study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient for this scale was 0.85.
Life Orientation Test (LOT) [42]. The test was adjusted and validated for the Spanish population [43,44], and the reported reliability was 0.66. LOT uses 6 Likert scales (1–5) to assess the overall optimism and pessimism. Mothers were asked about their ability to see the positive aspects of the situation, their optimistic view of the future, their attitude towards tasks, or their expectations for beneficial events in life. After performing reverse scoring on items 2, 4, and 5, the total score was divided by 6. The LOT score was interpreted as the higher the score, the higher the degree of optimism and the lower the degree of pessimism. The LOT has been widely used in research and epidemiological studies [45]. Our Cronbach’s alpha coefficient for this scale was 0.80.
Edinburgh Postpartum Depression Scale (EPDS) [46]. This study used the validated Spanish version of the EPDS [47,48], with a sensitivity of 79.0% and a specificity of 95.5%. EPDS is a self-reporting scale consisting of 10 items using the Likert scale (0–3), including the mother’s feelings of anxiety, fear, stress, and enjoyment. The total score ranges from 0 to 30. The higher the score, the higher the severity of depressive symptoms. The optimal cut-off point was established when ≥11, with a sensitivity of 79.2% and a specificity of 94.4% [49]. Mothers were asked to fill out a questionnaire based on how they felt in the past 7 days. In our study, the Cronbach’s α coefficient of this scale was 0.87.
Adherence to the Healthy Food Pyramid questionnaire (AP-Q) [50]. A self-administered tool validated in the Spanish adult population and breastfeeding women during the first month of lactation [50,51] was used. The AP-Q estimates the degree of adherence to the HFP, which is a graphic representation of the Mediterranean diet [52,53]. It measures the frequency of the consumption of foods of different categories during the last month, as well as other aspects of the HFP. The AP-Q consists of 27 multiple-choice questions grouped into 10 different categories, including physical activity; healthy habits (lifestyle, emotional balance, sleep hygiene, and culinary techniques) and culinary techniques; hydration (water intake, soft drinks, wine and beers, and distilled beverages); grains; seeds and legumes; fruits; vegetables; oil type; dairy products; animal proteins; and snacks. The AP-Q global score ranges from 0 to 10. The higher the score, the greater the adherence to the HFP.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The quantitative variables were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation if following a normal distribution or as the median and interquartile range (Q1; Q3) when they did not follow the normal distribution. The normality was checked by the Shapiro test. The qualitative variables were reported as the percentage (%), along with the sample size. The differences among groups were analyzed by Fisher’s exact test for qualitative variables and the Mann–Whitney U test for quantitative variables. Spearman’s rho (ρ) was used to analyze the correlations between the quantitative variables. The data analyses were performed using R software (version 3.5.2, R Core Team 2018) within RStudio (version 1.1.453, RStudio, Inc., Vienna, Austria) using the rio, dplyr, devtools, and compareGroups packages. The plots were generated using ggplot2 and ggpubr packages. The results were considered statistically significant for p-values < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Population Characteristics

Overall, the median age was 34.0 (31.5; 37.0) years old, and 66.0% of the women were of Spanish origin. The non-Spanish origin women were 22.0% from South American, 4.0% from Asia, 4.0% from Central Europe, and 2.0% from North America. Mothers whose origins were not Spanish had been residing in Spain for 13.0 (9.0; 15.0) years. Few (8.16%) of the women had a postgraduate degree, 36.7% had a bachelor’s degree, and 34% had high school, and 20.4% had middle school, studies. Regarding the employment status at the time of delivery, 71.4% of the mothers were employed, while 14.3% were unemployed, and 2.0% were studying. The rest were on maternity leave or involved in household tasks. The family core was biparental in 83.3% and monoparental in 14.6% of the women. The family sizes ranged between two and 10 persons.
To analyze the differences between mothers who had a term and preterm deliveries, the sociodemographic and nutritional characteristics between these groups are summarized in Table 1. Maternal age, origin, educational level, employment status, family core, and family size were not significantly different between mothers who had premature compared to term deliveries. The AP-Q global score, as a degree of adherence to the HFP, was not significantly different between groups.
Overall, the obstetrical medical records reflected two (one to three) pregnancies, zero (zero to one) abortions, and two (one to two) live births. Few (6.3%) (3/55) of the women used assisted reproductive techniques, and 29.1% (16/55) had a C-section delivery. Single pregnancies made up 87.3% (48/55), with twins making up the rest of the cohort. The gestational complication prevalence was 38.8% (18/55), the most common being gestational diabetes (24.5%).
Regarding gestational age, the mothers with preterm deliveries had 29.9 (27.7; 35.0) weeks of gestation, while the mothers with term delivery had 38.9 (38.0; 40.0) weeks of gestation. Assisted reproduction techniques, C-section, obstetric complications, the number of pregnancies, abortions, and infant sex were not significantly different between mothers who had preterm or term deliveries. Likewise, significant differences were found in the twin pregnancies, since all were preterm. The number of live children was significant between the groups (Table 2).

3.2. Psychological Variables of Breastfeeding Women

At 14 days postpartum, the PSS score of mothers with preterm infants was 1.6 ± 0.5 and 1.5 ± 0.9 in mothers with term deliveries. No statistical differences between the groups were detected (p-value = 0.725). At 6 months postpartum, we presented a response rate of 41.8% (23/55), of which 60.9% (14/23) of the women maintained breastfeeding. The PSS score of mothers with preterm infants was 1.6 ± 0.5, while, in mothers with term delivery, it was 1.4 ± 0.8, without statistical difference (p-value = 0.351). Longitudinally, between 14 days and 6 months postpartum, the PSS did not show significant differences (p-value = 0.103).
At 14 days postpartum in the LOT scale, mothers with preterm infants scored 3.6 ± 0.7, while mothers with term deliveries scored 3.9 ± 0.7, with no significant differences between the groups (p-value = 0.151). At 6 months postpartum, the LOT score was also not significant between the groups (mothers with preterm infants = 3.7 ± 0.8 and mothers with term infants = 3.8 ± 0.7; p-value = 0.836). The LOT score in the entire cohort was lower at 6 months (3.8 ± 0.7) compared to the score at 14 days (3.9 ± 0.7; p-value = 0.046), suggesting a reduction in dispositional optimism with time after postpartum.
Regarding postpartum depression, we observed that, at 6 months postpartum, a higher EPDS score was significantly higher in mothers with preterm deliveries (9.0±4.7) than those with term deliveries (5.4 ± 4.2; p-value = 0.040). No significant correlations were detected between the gestational age and PSS (rho = -0.135; p-value = 0.446), LOT (rho = 0.023; p-value = 0.898), and EPDS (rho = -0.324; p-value = 0.062). The LOT correlated negatively and significantly with the PSS (rho = -0.490; p-value = 0.003) and EPDS (rho = -0.642; p-value < 0.001). On the other hand, the PSS and EPDS correlated positively and significantly (rho = 0.817; p-value < 0.001).

3.3. Relationship between Psychological and Nutritional Variables

The relationship between the different psychological questionnaires and the global score of the AP-Q was analyzed. Regarding the AP-Q global score, no significant correlations were detected with the PSS at 14 days (rho = −0.137; p-value = 0.496) and at 6 months postpartum (rho = −0.209; p-value = 0.389). There was no significant correlation between the AP-Q and EPDS (rho = −0.281; p-value = 0.243). However, a significant positive correlation was observed between the AP-Q global score and LOT, both at 14 days (Figure 2A) and 6 months postpartum (Figure 2B).

4. Discussion

Culturally, pregnancy is considered a time of happiness and expectation in a woman’s life, welcoming a new member of the family. However, pregnancy and postpartum can be stressful events that can instigate anxiety and alter the maternal emotional state [54]. This situation may be exacerbated in vulnerable populations exposed to additional challenges. In this study, we explored preterm delivery as a situation of stress that may undermine the maternal psychological resources and the capacity of a healthy lifestyle to modulate the psychological variables.
In this study, maternal psychological characteristics were explored using the PSS, which measures stress perception, the LOT, which assesses dispositional optimism, and the EPDS, which is used to screen women at risk of postpartum depression. These psychological variables have barely been explored during breastfeeding, a time of challenges and uncertainties for women.
The score obtained by the study on the PSS was 1.6 out of four points, indicating a low perception of stress at 14 days postpartum. Although preterm delivery is an event that increases maternal stress [21,22,23,24,25], in our cohort, no differences were observed between mothers who had term and preterm deliveries. In addition, we also analyzed dispositional optimism, since it has been proposed that dispositional optimism could play a part against perceived stress after childbirth [55]. We did not detect differences between mothers with term or preterm deliveries with a score of 3.8, close to the maximum of five points attainable. However, it has been observed that pregnant women with lower scores of LOT had a higher risk of preterm delivery, although these differences were not significant either [56]. The relationship between prematurity and optimism can be complex. Some data consider prematurity as a stressful life event for the maternity [57,58]; considering stressful life events as a risk factor for anxiety during the postnatal period [15], the prematurity could be a factor that moves the mother away from optimism. Lobel et al. observed that women who were the least optimistic delivered infants who weighed significantly less. Among other potential explanations, it has been suggested that optimistic people are more likely to exercise, and exercise has been associated with a lower risk of preterm delivery [59]. However, the relationship between optimism/pessimism and its implications in the threat of preterm delivery need to be explored deeply.
The lack of differences between mothers with term and preterm deliveries in the psychological variables may be related to the fact that only the gestational age of the newborn was considered as a stress factor, and we did not explore other aspects of prematurity, such as infant health status, maternal support, or work–family conflicts. The role of these factors in the maternal psychological status deserves further attention. While the perceived stress did not vary between day 14 and 6 months, the dispositional optimism did, decreasing at 6 months in the entire cohort. This data suggests that, during the postpartum period, the mother may lose optimism. There may be multiple reasons, including work–family conflicts, since, in Spain, the maternity leave duration is three months, and mothers can have difficulties in maintaining breastfeeding for six months, as the WHO proposes. In addition, to interpret the data, it is necessary to consider that our cohort suffered the COVID-19 pandemic. It is known that optimism can be eroded by events that are negative in nature [60] and that this pandemic reduced the overall optimism of individuals [61]. Besides the specific situation created by the pandemic, our results pointed out the importance of following up on breastfeeding women for longer periods. Previous data suggested a relationship between postpartum depression and breastfeeding patterns, boosted at three months postpartum [3]. However, postpartum depression could be extended even more [62]. At six months after delivery, mothers completed the EPDS, and higher scores were observed in those with preterm deliveries. These results are consistent with a meta-analysis that demonstrated that mothers of premature infants had an increased risk of postpartum depression [63,64]. Likewise, it has been observed that healthcare professionals’ support and the follow-up of mothers in the postpartum period can reduce the risk of developing mental health pathologies. The mental healthcare responsibility during the postpartum period relies mostly on nurse professionals [65], among others. Our results could suggest that women need longer support during the breastfeeding period, particularly those with additional vulnerabilities, such as women with preterm deliveries. This highlights the importance of maternal mental health in mothers with preterm deliveries from healthcare professionals not only in the early weeks postpartum but, also, when following up on them during the subsequent months [63,64].
Breastfeeding has multiple benefits, including the physical and mental health of the mother and infant. Evidence indicates that breastfeeding reduces maternal anxiety and stress, and contributes to improving the maternal mood [12,13,14]. Mothers without social support have difficulty coping with the challenges associated with exclusive breastfeeding. In addition, they may have high emotional burdens associated with guilt and feelings of inadequacy. These feelings are usually related to stopping breastfeeding prematurely, leading to psychological stress in the mother. In addition, because society and education have a high awareness of the proven benefits of breastfeeding, many women feel tremendous social pressure to breastfeed. When mothers with severe breastfeeding problems report guilt and loneliness, they usually show psychological distress, which can lead to feelings of worthlessness and failure [14,66]. Considering all of this, healthcare professionals need to be focused on mothers to offer breastfeeding support linked with psychological strength and coping, working as part of a multidisciplinary healthcare team. Before establishing exclusive breastfeeding, lactating mothers and their social support must be intervened with differently before and after delivery. These interventions should educate parents on the importance of skin contact immediately after delivery, maternal rest, and communication and make these mothers feel understood and supported by professional nursing staff.
Increasing evidence indicates that nutrition is a crucial factor also implicated in mental health [67]. Studies highlight that dietary patterns influence the likelihood of fragile mental health, particularly depression [68,69,70,71]. A Mediterranean diet pattern has been found to improve depressive symptoms and increase remission rates [72]. In addition to the healthy eating component, other elements (i.e., physical activity and sleep quality) have known benefits on mental health and overall wellbeing [73]. These three elements: diet, exercise, and sleep quality, are evaluated in the AP-Q questionnaire (indicative of adherence to a healthy lifestyle pattern). For this reason, the relationship between psychological variables and the AP-Q score was analyzed in our lactating women cohort. The most relevant association was found in the AP-Q score and optimism. Epidemiological studies have also shown that more optimistic people have a better health pattern compared to pessimistic ones [60]. The association between nutrition and mental health is bidirectional: adequate nutrition allows for good physical and mental health, and on the other hand, mental health influences diet [69,70,71]. Therefore, it is not possible to determine whether mothers with greater optimism take better care of themselves or if a better lifestyle influences the mental health of breastfeeding women. In any case, this association is relevant from the point of view of their overall health. It would be desirable to analyze the AP-Q in other psychology-related contexts to establish its validity in different populations.
Promoting healthy habits not only during pregnancy but also during the postpartum period has important benefits to women’s health [74,75]. Health professionals, particularly nurses, should support and orient them to make them feel qualified for the new role of mother, motivate them to breastfeed by analyzing the complications, and evaluate their support network [75,76,77,78,79].
In the immediate postpartum period, healthcare professionals should ensure the correct establishment of breastfeeding, evaluating the process and helping if difficulties arise [78]. The importance of health system support is endorsed by studies that showed that the presence of breastfeeding-specialized nurses after delivery can be even more effective than prenatal actions (although these are necessary) [79].
In the late postpartum period, healthcare is focused on the newborn, and it is not always considered that the mother is fundamental in whom care should also be focused [80]. Healthcare professionals should provide effective support to the mother to prevent the early cessation of exclusive breastfeeding [78]. In addition, they should assess the emotional balance of the breastfeeding woman, which can avoid early depressive symptoms, and be able to intervene before postpartum depression develops. All this evidence on mental health and a robust psychological capital plays an important role in the adaptation of women in the postpartum stage.

Limitations and Futures Perspectives

It is necessary to interpret the data, considering that our cohort suffered the COVID-19 pandemic. It is known that optimism can be eroded by events that are negative in nature [60], and this pandemic reduced the overall optimism of individuals [61]. In addition, it has been shown that postpartum depression can last until at least 6 months after delivery, which makes the long-term follow-up of these women necessary. Due to maternal–filial attachment bonding and breastfeeding, the health of the newborn could be affected. For this reason, it could be necessary to implement work–family reconciliation policies.
In future studies, it would be important to perform repeated measures on psychological variables, including both negative and positive emotions, to draw out the full spectrum of the postpartum period. In addition, in this study, the AP-Q was assessed in the first month of lactation and the psychological determinations in month six postpartum. It would be interesting to consider the nutrition and healthy habits evaluation and follow-up matched with the psychological variables to corroborate our data. Furthermore, the nursing protocol needs to be tested related to studying what interventions could be beneficial in the context of breastfeeding, particularly in vulnerable populations. To support this, it has been shown that, when nurses carry out educational interventions aimed at mothers during their postpartum stay, not only does the rate of exclusively breastfeeding increase but, also, the risk of mood alterations is reduced [81].

5. Conclusions

Our data demonstrated the relationship between optimism and adherence to healthy habits of women during the postpartum period. We also evidenced that optimism decreases over the lactation time, with women at risk of losing nutritional healthy habits. Considering the influence of the psychological parameters on the maternal mental health can help to improve and develop breastfeeding support programs. Therefore, counseling from healthcare professionals is essential during the breastfeeding period, particularly in women with preterm deliveries who have a higher susceptibility to postpartum depression. It would be important to confirm these findings to include recommendations for women during lactation based on the scientific data and supported by a multidisciplinary team.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.M.A. and D.R.-C.; methodology, A.G.-D. and D.R.-C.; software, A.G.-D.; validation, S.M.A. and D.R.-C.; formal analysis, A.G.-D.; investigation, A.G.-D. and G.H.C.; data curation, A.G.-D.; writing—original draft preparation, A.G.-D. and G.H.C.; writing—review and editing, S.M.A. and D.R.-C.; visualization, A.G.-D. and G.H.C.; supervision, S.M.A. and D.R.-C.; and funding acquisition, A.G.-D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Institutional Review Board Statement

This study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Hospital Clínico San Carlos (Madrid; Spain, Ref. 19/393-E, on 10 June 2019).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The availability of the data is restricted to investigators based in academic institutions.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to thank Amparo Varas, James Rhodes, Mª Carmen Nevado, Laura de la Calle, Pedro Ricote, Abako, TGT, Instalaciones Cedial S.L., and Productos Medicinales Medela, S.L. (Spain) for their support and Fundación Española para la Ciencia y Tecnología (FECYT, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación; Spain) for providing dissemination.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of the data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. del Ciampo, L.A.; del Ciampo, I.R.L. Breastfeeding and the benefits of lactation for women’s health. Rev. Bras. Ginecol. Obstet. 2018, 40, 354–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Liu, H.; Yang, Y. Effects of a psychological nursing intervention on prevention of anxiety and depression in the postpartum period: A randomized controlled trial. Ann. Gen. Psychiatry 2021, 20, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Gila-Díaz, A.; Herranz Carrillo, G.; López de Pablo, Á.L.; Arribas, S.M.; Ramiro-Cortijo, D. Association between maternal postpartum depression, stress, optimism, and breastfeeding pattern in the first six months. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 7153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Organización Mundial de la Salud Lactancia Materna Exclusiva. Available online: http://www.who.int/elena/titles/exclusive_breastfeeding/es/ (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  5. World Health Organization. Infant and Young Child Feeding . Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/infant-and-young-child-feeding (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  6. Oyetunji, A.; Chandra, P. Postpartum stress and infant outcome: A review of current literature. Psychiatry Res. 2020, 284, 112769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Chowdhury, R.; Sinha, B.; Sankar, M.J.; Taneja, S.; Bhandari, N.; Rollins, N.; Bahl, R.; Martines, J. Breastfeeding and maternal health outcomes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatr. Int. J. Paediatr. 2015, 104, 96–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Dias, C.C.; Figueiredo, B. Breastfeeding and depression: A systematic review of the literature. J. Affect. Disord. 2015, 171, 142–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Ystrom, E. Breastfeeding cessation and symptoms of anxiety and depression: A longitudinal cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2012, 12, 36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Nishioka, E.; Haruna, M.; Ota, E.; Matsuzaki, M.; Murayama, R.; Yoshimura, K.; Murashima, S. A prospective study of the relationship between breastfeeding and postpartum depressive symptoms appearing at 1-5 months after delivery. J. Affect. Disord. 2011, 133, 553–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Field, T.; Diego, M.A.; Hernandez-Reif, M.; Figueiredo, B.; Ascencio, A.; Schanberg, S.; Kuhn, C. Prenatal dysthymia versus major depression effects on maternal cortisol and fetal growth. Depress. Anxiety 2008, 25, E11–E16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Mezzacappa, E.S.; Katkin, E.S. Breast-feeding is associated with reduced perceived stress and negative mood in mothers. Heal. Psychol. 2002, 21, 187–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Pope, C.J.; Mazmanian, D. Breastfeeding and postpartum depression: An overview and methodological recommendations for future research. Depress. Res. Treat. 2016, 2016, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Sisk, P.M.; Lovelady, C.A.; Dillard, R.G.; Gruber, K.J. Lactation counseling for mothers of very low birth weight infants: Effect on maternal anxiety and infant intake of human milk. Pediatrics 2006, 117, e67–e75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  15. Biaggi, A.; Conroy, S.; Pawlby, S.; Pariante, C.M. Identifying the women at risk of antenatal anxiety and depression: A systematic review. J. Affect. Disord. 2016, 191, 62–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Khanal, V.; Lee, A.H.; Scott, J.A.; Karkee, R.; Binns, C.W. Implications of methodological differences in measuring the rates of exclusive breastfeeding in Nepal: Findings from literature review and cohort study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2016, 16, 389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Cerda Muñoz, L. Lactancia materna y gestión del cuidado. Rev Cuba. Enfermer 2011, 27, 327–336. [Google Scholar]
  18. Rodríguez Valiente, S.; Jara Valiño, F.J.; Romero Barranco, M. Papel de la Enfermera en la Lactancia Materna. Revista Electrónica de Portales Medicos.com. 2017. Available online: https://www.revista-portalesmedicos.com/revista-medica/enfermera-lactancia-materna/#google_vignette (accessed on 23 March 2021).
  19. Cohen, S.S.; Alexander, D.D.; Krebs, N.F.; Young, B.E.; Cabana, M.D.; Erdmann, P.; Hays, N.P.; Bezold, C.P.; Levin-Sparenberg, E.; Turini, M.; et al. Factors Associated with Breastfeeding Initiation and Continuation: A Meta-Analysis. J. Pediatr. 2018, 203, 190–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Victora, C.G.; Bahl, R.; Barros, A.J.D.; França, G.V.A.; Horton, S.; Krasevec, J.; Murch, S.; Sankar, M.J.; Walker, N.; Rollins, N.C.; et al. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: Epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet 2016, 387, 475–490. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Marín Morales, D.; Carmona Monge, F.J.; Toro Molina, S.; Montejo Rodríguez, R.; Peñacoba Puente, C.; Velasco Furlong, L.; Carretero Abellán, I. Indicadores de estrés en el postparto y su relación con el estado anímico de la mujer en el puerperio. NURE Investig. 2013, 1, 8. [Google Scholar]
  22. Field, T. Postnatal anxiety prevalence, predictors and effects on development: A narrative review. Infant Behav. Dev. 2018, 51, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Winter, L.; Colditz, P.B.; Sanders, M.R.; Boyd, R.N.; Pritchard, M.; Gray, P.H.; Whittingham, K.; Forrest, K.; Leeks, R.; Webb, L.; et al. Depression, posttraumatic stress and relationship distress in parents of very preterm infants. Arch. Womens. Ment. Health 2018, 21, 445–451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Moldenhauer, J.S. Depresión Posparto. Available online: https://www.msdmanuals.com/es/professional/ginecología-y-obstetricia/atención-posparto-y-trastornos-asociados/depresión-posparto?query=depresión (accessed on 23 March 2021).
  25. Calsina, S.P.; Obregón Gutiérrez, N.; Calle Del Fresno, S.; Besa, M.E.; Cantó Codina, L.; Tricas, J.G. Anxiety and depression in mothers of preterm infants. Intervention strategies and literature review. Matronas Prof. 2018, 19, 21–27. [Google Scholar]
  26. Khaleghipour, M.; Akbari, N.; Hajaty, S.; Shirmohammadi Fard, S.; Jamalimoghaddam, M.; Sabzi, Z.; Asadi, L. Evaluation of the effect of narrative writing on the stress sources of the fathers of preterm neonates admitted to the NICU. J. Matern. Neonatal Med. 2020, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Borimnejad, L.; Mehrnoosh, N.; Fatemi, N.S.; Haghani, H. Impacts of creating opportunities for parent empowerment on maternal stress: A quasi-experimental study. Iran. J. Nurs. Midwifery Res. 2013, 18, 218–221. [Google Scholar]
  28. Mörelius, E.; Örtenstrand, A.; Theodorsson, E.; Frostell, A. A randomised trial of continuous skin-to-skin contact after preterm birth and the effects on salivary cortisol, parental stress, depression, and breastfeeding. Early Hum. Dev. 2015, 91, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Sierra, J.C.; Ortega, V. Ansiedad, angustia y estrés: Tres conceptos a diferenciar Ihab Zubeidat. Mal-Estar E Subjetividade 2003, 3, 10–59. [Google Scholar]
  30. Skrundz, M.; Bolten, M.; Nast, I.; Hellhammer, D.H.; Meinlschmidt, G. Plasma oxytocin concentration during pregnancy is associated with development of postpartum depression. Neuropsychopharmacology 2011, 36, 1886–1893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Kominiarek, M.A.; Rajan, P. Nutrition Recommendations in Pregnancy and Lactation. Med. Clin. N. Am. 2016, 100, 1199–1215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Segura, S.A.; Ansótegui, J.A.; Marta Díaz-Gómez, N. The importance of maternal nutrition during breastfeeding: Do breastfeeding mothers need nutritional supplements? An. Pediatr. 2016, 84, e1–e347. [Google Scholar]
  33. Ballard, O.; Morrow, A.L. Human Milk Composition. Nutrients and Bioactive Factors. Pediatr. Clin. N. Am. 2013, 60, 49–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Snyder, K.; Pelster, A.K.; Dinkel, D. Healthy eating and physical activity among breastfeeding women: The role of misinformation. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. MacMillan Uribe, A.L.; Olson, B.H. Exploring Healthy Eating and Exercise Behaviors among Low-Income Breastfeeding Mothers. J. Hum. Lact. 2019, 35, 59–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Widmer, R.J.; Flammer, A.J.; Lerman, L.O.; Lerman, A. The Mediterranean diet, its components, and cardiovascular disease. Am. J. Med. 2015, 128, 229–238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Psaltopoulou, T.; Sergentanis, T.N.; Panagiotakos, D.B.; Sergentanis, I.N.; Kosti, R.; Scarmeas, N. Mediterranean diet, stroke, cognitive impairment, and depression: A meta-analysis. Ann. Neurol. 2013, 74, 580–591. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Islam, M.J.; Broidy, L.; Baird, K.; Mazerolle, P. Intimate partner violence around the time of pregnancy and postpartum depression: The experience of women of Bangladesh. PLoS ONE 2017, 12, e0176211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Cohen, S.; Kamarck, T.; Mermelstein, R. A global measure of perceived stress. J. Health Soc. Behav. 1983, 24, 385–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Remor, E. Psychometric properties of a European Spanish version of the Perceived Stress Scale (PSS). Span. J. Psychol. 2006, 9, 86–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. White, R.S.; Jiang, J.; Hall, C.B.; Katz, M.J.; Zimmerman, M.E.; Sliwinski, M.; Lipton, R.B. Higher Perceived Stress Scale scores are associated with higher pain intensity and pain interference levels in older adults. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 2014, 62, 2350–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Scheier, M.F.; Carver, C.S.; Bridges, M.W. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1994, 67, 1063–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Joan Ferrando, P.; Chico Josep Ma Tous, E. Propiedades psicométricas del test de optimismo Life Orientation Test. Psicothema 2002, 14, 673–680. [Google Scholar]
  44. Pan, T.M.; Mills, S.D.; Fox, R.S.; Baik, S.H.; Harry, K.M.; Roesch, S.C.; Sadler, G.R.; Malcarne, V.L. The Psychometric Properties of English and Spanish Versions of the Life Orientation Test-Revised in Hispanic Americans. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 2017, 39, 657–668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Glaesmer, H.; Rief, W.; Martin, A.; Mewes, R.; Brähler, E.; Zenger, M.; Hinz, A. Psychometric properties and population-based norms of the Life Orientation Test Revised (LOT-R). Br. J. Health Psychol. 2012, 17, 432–445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Cox, J.L.; Holden, J.M.; Sagovsky, R. Detection of postnatal depression. Development of the 10-item Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Br. J. Psychiatry 1987, 150, 782–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Garcia-Esteve, L.; Ascaso, C.; Ojuel, J.; Navarro, P. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) in Spanish mothers. J. Affect. Disord. 2003, 75, 71–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Vázquez, M.B.; Míguez, M.C. Validation of the Edinburgh postnatal depression scale as a screening tool for depression in Spanish pregnant women. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 246, 515–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Smith-Nielsen, J.; Matthey, S.; Lange, T.; Væver, M.S. Validation of the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale against both DSM-5 and ICD-10 diagnostic criteria for depression. BMC Psychiatry 2018, 18, 393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gila-Díaz, A.; Arribas, S.M.; López de Pablo, Á.L.; López-Giménez, M.R.; Phuthong, S.; Ramiro-Cortijo, D. Development and validation of a questionnaire to assess adherence to the healthy food pyramid in Spanish adults. Nutrients 2020, 12, 1656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gila-Díaz, A.; Alcántara, N.D.-R.; Carrillo, G.H.; Singh, P.; Arribas, S.M.; Ramiro-Cortijo, D. Multidimensional Approach to Assess Nutrition and Lifestyle in Breastfeeding Women during the First Month of Lactation. Nutrients 2021, 13, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Bach-Faig, A.; Berry, E.M.; Lairon, D.; Reguant, J.; Trichopoulou, A.; Dernini, S.; Medina, F.X.; Battino, M.; Belahsen, R.; Miranda, G.; et al. Mediterranean diet pyramid today. Science and cultural updates. Public Health Nutr. 2011, 14, 2274–2284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Sotos-Prieto, M.; Moreno-Franco, B.; Ordovás, J.M.; León, M.; Casasnovas, J.A.; Peñalvo, J.L. Design and development of an instrument to measure overall lifestyle habits for epidemiological research: The Mediterranean Lifestyle (MEDLIFE) index. Public Health Nutr. 2015, 18, 959–967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Bondas, T.; Eriksson, K. Women’s lived experiences of pregnancy: A tapestry of joy and suffering. Qual. Health Res. 2001, 11, 824–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Levy, S.; Heruti, I.; Avitsur, R. Physical injury, stress, and health: Protective role of dispositional optimism. Stress Heal. 2019, 35, 267–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Giangiordanoa, I.; Sahanib, H.; Di Mascioc, D.; Sacconee, G.; Bellussif, F.; Berghellag, A.; Bravermand, A.; Berghella, V. Optimism during pregnancy and obstetrical outcomes: A systematic review. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2020, 248, 95–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Zhu, P.; Tao, F.; Hao, J.; Sun, Y.; Jiang, X. Prenatal life events stress: Implications for preterm birth and infant birthweight. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2010, 203, e1–e34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Christiaens, I.; Hegadoren, K.; Olson, D.M. Adverse childhood experiences are associated with spontaneous preterm birth: A case-control study. BMC Med. 2015, 13, 124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Lobel, M.; DeVincent, C.; Kaminer, A.; Meyer, B. The impact of prenatal maternal stress and optimistic disposition on birth outcomes in medically high-risk women. Health Psychol. 2000, 19, 544–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Scheier, M.F.; Carver, C.S. Dispositional optimism and physical health: A long look back, a quick look forward. Am. Psychol. 2018, 73, 1082–1094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Martin-Krumm, C.; Tarquinio, C.; Tarquinio, C. Optimism and COVID-19: A resource to support people in confinement? Ann. Med. Psychol. 2020, 178, 728–737. [Google Scholar]
  62. Anding, J.; Röhrle, B.; Grieshop, M.; Schücking, B.; Christiansen, H. Early Detection of Postpartum Depressive Symptoms in Mothers and Fathers and Its Relation to Midwives’ Evaluation and Service Provision: A Community-Based Study. Front. Pediatr. 2015, 3. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. de Paula Eduardo, J.A.F.; de Rezende, M.G.; Menezes, P.R.; Del-Ben, C.M. Preterm birth as a risk factor for postpartum depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Affect. Disord. 2019, 259, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Vigod, S.N.; Villegas, L.; Dennis, C.L.; Ross, L.E. Prevalence and risk factors for postpartum depression among women with preterm and low-birth-weight infants: A systematic review. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2010, 117, 540–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Paladine, H.; Blenning, C.; Strangas, Y. Postpartum Care: An Approach to the Fourth Trimester. Am. Fam. Physician 2019, 100, 485–491. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  66. Palmér, L.; Carlsson, G.; Mollberg, M.; Nyström, M. Severe breastfeeding difficulties: Existential lostness as a mother-Women’s lived experiences of initiating breastfeeding under severe difficulties. Int. J. Qual. Stud. Health Well-being 2012, 7, 10846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Sarris, J.; Logan, A.C.; Akbaraly, T.N.; Amminger, G.P.; Balanzá-Martínez, V.; Freeman, M.P.; Hibbeln, J.; Matsuoka, Y.; Mischoulon, D.; Mizoue, T.; et al. Nutritional medicine as mainstream in psychiatry. Lancet Psychiatry 2015, 2, 271–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Van Der Pols, J.C. Nutrition and mental health: Bidirectional associations and multidimensional measures. Public Health Nutr. 2018, 21, 829–830. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  69. Rahe, C.; Unrath, M.; Berger, K. Dietary patterns and the risk of depression in adults: A systematic review of observational studies. Eur. J. Nutr. 2014, 53, 997–1013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  70. Lai, J.S.; Hiles, S.; Bisquera, A.; Hure, A.J.; McEvoy, M.; Attia, J. A systematic review and meta-analysis of dietary patterns and depression in community-dwelling adults. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 2014, 99, 181–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Li, Y.; Lv, M.R.; Wei, Y.J.; Sun, L.; Zhang, J.X.; Zhang, H.G.; Li, B. Dietary patterns and depression risk: A meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2017, 253, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ventriglio, A.; Sancassiani, F.; Contu, M.P.; Latorre, M.; Di Slavatore, M.; Fornaro, M.; Bhugra, D. Mediterranean Diet and its Benefits on Health and Mental Health: A Literature Review. Clin. Pract. Epidemiol. Ment. Health 2020, 16, 156–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Hosker, D.K.; Elkins, R.M.; Potter, M.P. Promoting Mental Health and Wellness in Youth through Physical Activity, Nutrition, and Sleep. Child Adolesc. Psychiatr. Clin. N. Am. 2019, 28, 171–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Machado, M.; Assis, K.; Oliveira Fde, C.; Ribeiro, A.; Araújo, R.; Cury, A.; Priore, S.; Franceschini Sdo, C. Determinants of the exclusive breastfeeding abandonment: Psychosocial factors. Rev. Saude Publica 2014, 48, 985–994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Ferreira, H.; Oliveira, M.; Bernardo, E.; Almeida, P.; Aquino, P.; Pinheiro, A. Factors Associated with Adherence to the Exclusive Breastfeeding. Cien. Saude Colet. 2018, 23, 683–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Daniele, M.; Maciel, D.O.; Gouveia, S.C.; Pamplona, F.C.; Sardinha, L.M.; De Carvalho, M.D.S.B.; Silva, A.G.I. Da Promotion of Breastfeeding in Pre-natal Care by the Nurse. Rev. Enferm. UFPE Line 2019, 13, 852–857. [Google Scholar]
  77. Piro, S.; Ahmed, H. Impacts of antenatal nursing interventions on mothers’ breastfeeding self-efficacy: An experimental study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth 2020, 20, 19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. da Graça, L.; Figueiredo Mdo, C.; Conceição, M. Contributions of the nursing intervention in primary healthcare for the promotion of breastfeeding. Rev. Lat. Am. Enfermagem 2011, 19, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Gutiérrez Martínez, M. del M.; González Carrión, P.; Quiñoz Gallardo, M.D.; Rivas Campos, A.; Expósito Ruiz, M.; Zurita Muñoz, A.J. Evaluación de buenas prácticas en lactancia materna en un hospital materno infantil. Rev. Esp. Salud Publica 2019, 93, e201911088. [Google Scholar]
  80. Souza, A.B.Q.; Fernandes, B.M. Guidelines for nursing care: An effective tool for the promotion of health in puerperium. Rev Rene 2014, 15, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Souza, E.; Pina-Oliveira, A.; Shimo, A. Effect of a breastfeeding educational intervention: A randomized controlled trial. Rev. Lat. Am. Enfermagem 2020, 28, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagram of the study design and time point.
Figure 1. Diagram of the study design and time point.
Children 08 00937 g001
Figure 2. Correlations between the AP-Q and LOT at 14 days (A) and 6 months postpartum (B). The line represents the regression trend, the pink spots show mothers with term deliveries, and the blue spots mothers with preterm deliveries. The Spearman’s rho coefficient (ρ) and the p-value associated are shown in the graph.
Figure 2. Correlations between the AP-Q and LOT at 14 days (A) and 6 months postpartum (B). The line represents the regression trend, the pink spots show mothers with term deliveries, and the blue spots mothers with preterm deliveries. The Spearman’s rho coefficient (ρ) and the p-value associated are shown in the graph.
Children 08 00937 g002
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and AP-Q score between women with term and preterm deliveries.
Table 1. Sociodemographic characteristics and AP-Q score between women with term and preterm deliveries.
Term (n = 30)Preterm (n = 25)p-Value
Maternal age (years)34.0 (32.2; 35.8)35.0 (28.0; 38.0)0.659
Origin 1.000
  Spanish17 (65.4%)16 (69.6%)
  Non-Spanish9 (34.6%)7 (30.4%)
Educational level 0.178
  Middle school2 (8.0%)8 (33.3%)
  High school10 (40.0%)7 (29.2%)
  Bachelor’s degree11 (44.0%)7 (29.2%)
  Postgraduate studies2 (8.0%)2 (8.3%)
Employment status 0.849
  Studying0 (0.0%)1 (4.2%)
  Employed19 (76.0%)16 (66.7%)
  Other6 (24.0%)7 (29.1%)
Family core 0.701
  Monoparental3 (12.5%)4 (16.7%)
  Biparental21 (87.5%)19 (79.2%)
  Others0 (0.0%)1 (4.2%)
Family size4 [3; 4]4 [3; 5]0.494
AP-Q Score5.7 (5.3; 6.6)5.1 (4.5; 6.5)0.362
Data show the median and quartile range (Q1; Q3) for the quantitative variables and the relative frequency (%) and sample size (n) for the qualitative variables. Adherence to the Healthy Food Pyramid questionnaire (AP-Q). The p-value was extracted from the Mann–Whitney U test for the quantitative variables or Fisher’s exact test for the qualitative variables.
Table 2. Clinical characteristics between women with term and preterm deliveries.
Table 2. Clinical characteristics between women with term and preterm deliveries.
Term (n = 30)Preterm (n = 25)p-Value
Gestational age (weeks)38.9 (38.0; 40.0)29.9 (27.7; 35.0)<0.001
Assisted reproduction techniques1 (3.6%)2 (9.1%)0.576
C-section8 (26.7%)8 (32.0%)0.892
Obstetric complications7 (29.2%)11 (45.8%)0.371
Twin pregnancy0 (0.0%)7 (28.0%)0.002
Number of pregnancies2 (2; 2)2 (1; 4)0.379
Number of abortions0 (0; 0.8)0 (0; 1)0.541
Number of live children2 (1; 2)2 (1; 3)0.016
Sex (male)9 (30.0%)15 (60.0%)0.050
Data show the median and quartile range (Q1; Q3) for the quantitative variables and the relative frequency (%) and sample size (n) for the qualitative variables. Obstetric complications were considered as a diagnosis of gestational diabetes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, and preeclampsia. The p-value was extracted from the Mann–Whitney U test for the quantitative variables or Fisher’s exact test for the qualitative variables.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gila-Díaz, A.; Herranz Carrillo, G.; Arribas, S.M.; Ramiro-Cortijo, D. Healthy Habits and Emotional Balance in Women during the Postpartum Period: Differences between Term and Preterm Delivery. Children 2021, 8, 937. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8100937

AMA Style

Gila-Díaz A, Herranz Carrillo G, Arribas SM, Ramiro-Cortijo D. Healthy Habits and Emotional Balance in Women during the Postpartum Period: Differences between Term and Preterm Delivery. Children. 2021; 8(10):937. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8100937

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gila-Díaz, Andrea, Gloria Herranz Carrillo, Silvia M. Arribas, and David Ramiro-Cortijo. 2021. "Healthy Habits and Emotional Balance in Women during the Postpartum Period: Differences between Term and Preterm Delivery" Children 8, no. 10: 937. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8100937

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop