Next Article in Journal
Detection of Early Warning Signs in Autism Spectrum Disorders: A Systematic Review
Previous Article in Journal
Behavioral Inhibition in Childhood: European Portuguese Adaptation of an Observational Measure (Lab-TAB)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Perspective on Similarities and Possible Overlaps of Congenital Disease Formation—Exemplified on a Case of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Neuroblastoma in a Neonate

by
Zihe Huo
1,2,†,
Remo Bilang
1,2,†,
Benedikt Brantner
1,
Nicolas von der Weid
2,3,
Stefan G. Holland-Cunz
1,2 and
Stephanie J. Gros
1,2,*
1
Department of Pediatric Surgery, University Children’s Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland
2
Department of Clinical Research, University of Basel, 4001 Basel, Switzerland
3
Department of Hematology and Oncology, University Children’s Hospital Basel, 4056 Basel, Switzerland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to the study.
Submission received: 29 January 2021 / Revised: 17 February 2021 / Accepted: 17 February 2021 / Published: 22 February 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Pediatric Surgery)

Abstract

:
The coincidence of two rare diseases such as congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and neuroblastoma is exceptional. With an incidence of around 2–3:10,000 and 1:8000 for either disease occurring on its own, the chance of simultaneous presentation of both pathologies at birth is extremely low. Unfortunately, the underlying processes leading to congenital malformation and neonatal tumors are not yet thoroughly understood. There are several hypotheses revolving around the formation of CDH and neuroblastoma. The aim of our study was to put the respective hypotheses of disease formation as well as known factors in this process into perspective regarding their similarities and possible overlaps of congenital disease formation. We present the joint occurrence of these two rare diseases based on a patient presentation and immunochemical prognostic marker evaluation. The aim of this manuscript is to elucidate possible similarities in the pathogeneses of both disease entities. Discussed are the role of toxins, cell differentiation, the influence of retinoic acid and NMYC as well as of hypoxia. The detailed discussion reveals that some of the proposed pathophysiological mechanisms of both malformations have common aspects. Especially disturbances of the retinoic acid pathway and NMYC expression can influence and disrupt cell differentiation in either disease. Due to the rarity of both diseases, interdisciplinary efforts and multi-center studies are needed to investigate the reasons for congenital malformations and their interlinkage with neonatal tumor disease.

1. Introduction

Rare diseases are defined by their relative severity and their low prevalence. Depending on the country or region, the definition of a rare disease ranges between a prevalence of lower than 0.1–7.5 per 10,000 inhabitants [1,2,3]. About 7000 rare diseases and disorders have been identified [3]. Roughly 50 million patients in Europe and the US are diagnosed with rare diseases. Half of these patients are children [2]. The coincidence of two rare diseases is, therefore, exceptional, but can occur in children and neonates. Oftentimes, the causes of rare congenital diseases are not completely understood yet.
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) is a rare condition in neonates with a prevalence of 2.3 in 10,000 births [4]. Any disturbance in the pleuroperitoneal membranes before the 12th week of gestation may result in a diaphragmatic defect. Anatomically, the most common hernia is located at the postero-lateral part of the diaphragm (70% to 75%, Bochdalek triangle, lumbocostal trigonum), and a majority of the hernias occur on the left side. Most cases nowadays are diagnosed in utero due to improvements in prenatal imaging. Improvements in surgery as well as supportive measures have led to an overall survival rate ranging between 60% and 70% for CDH [5]. In around 30% of cases, CDH is associated with other anomalies, most commonly cardiac anomalies followed by anomalies of the urinary tract, limbs and the nervous system [6]. Hypotheses regarding the pathogenesis of CDH include interruption of the formation of the diaphragm by fusion of the septum transversum anteriorly, the pleuroperitoneal folds dorsolaterally, the crura from the esophageal mesentery dorsally and the body wall mesoderm posteriorly [7,8]. Another hypothesis revolves around the failure of muscularization of the developing diaphragm prior to complete closure of the pleuroperitoneal canal [9].
Neuroblastoma is one of the most common solid malignancies in children; nevertheless, it is a rare disease with an incidence of 1:7000 to 1:8000 live births. Neuroblastoma contributes to 15% of child deaths from cancer [10]. However, the prognosis strongly depends on the risk profile of the tumor. Neuroblastoma is classified into four risk categories by the International Neuroblastoma Risk Group (INRG) classification system, which is based on several factors including age at diagnosis, tumor stage, histology, differentiation grade, copy number status of NMYC and deletion status of chromosome 11q among other segmental chromosomal abnormalities [11]. Neuroblastoma primary tumor and metastases are biologically very heterogeneous. They can present with clinical manifestations ranging from spontaneous regression to highly aggressive metastatic disease that is unresponsive to standard and investigational anti-cancer treatments [12]. Neuroblastoma most often develops in the adrenal medulla or other locations originating from the neural crest, such as the paraspinal sympathetic ganglia or the pelvic ganglia. Several genes that are involved in the regulation of neural crest development are expressed in neuroblastoma as well [13]. Neuroblastoma cells can present in varying differentiation stages, with heterogeneous phenotypes ranging from an initial epithelial-like one to a more branched and neuronal one [14]. How migrating neural crest cells convert to sympathetic precursors and, finally, to differentiated sympathetic neuronal cells has not yet been completely understood. Interruptions of this process, however, are made accountable for the formation of neuroblastoma.
Established and experimental adverse prognostic factors of neuroblastoma include amplification of NMYC, expression of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 that is responsible for metastatic homing and the hypoxia-dependent water channel aquaporin 1 (AQP1). NMYC is essential for the differentiation state of neuroblastoma cells and the fate of neural crest cells [15,16]. Knockdown of NMYC leads to apoptosis and terminal differentiation of the cells [17]. The chemokine receptor CXCR4 belongs to a large family of cytokine receptors. It is expressed in various cancers and is, therefore, well studied [18]. It has been shown that high expression of CXCR4 in neuroblastoma correlates with a significantly impaired outcome compared to low CXCR4 expression [19,20]. Expression of the water channel aquaporin 1 (AQP1) has been linked to a hypoxic cell phenotype with a higher expression of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α [21] (Huo et al., published February 2021, Front Cell Dev Biol.). This goes hand in hand with a greater potential of AQP1-positive cells to migrate in neuroblastoma.
The aim of our study was to put the respective hypotheses of disease formation of CDH and neuroblastoma as well as known factors in this process into perspective regarding their similarities and possible overlaps in congenital disease formation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Tumor Tissue

Patient tumor samples resected in the course of regular treatment and which were not needed for clinical investigations were used after patient consent, as approved by the appropriate ethics committee (Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz, EKNZ 2015-263). Tumor tissue was taken from the resected specimen immediately after surgery and snap-frozen or placed in formalin and embedded in paraffin.

2.2. H&E and Immunostaining

Next to routine pathological analysis, paraffin sections were stained by standard H&E (Hematoxylin and Eosin) and immunohistochemical staining for experiments. Cryosections were used for immunofluorescence staining.
Immunohistochemistry staining was performed using the HRP-AEC-System from R&D Systems (Biotechnology Company, Minneapolis, MN, USA) with polyclonal rabbit anti-AQP1 antibody (Merck Millipore, Darmstast, Germany) at a dilution of 1:400 and counterstaining was performed with Mayer’s hematoxylin solution (Spitalpharmazie, Basel, Switzerland). As a control, sections were incubated with antibody diluent (DAKO, Glostrup, Denmark) without primary antibody at 4 °C overnight and then treated as other samples.
For AQP1, MAP2 (microtubule associated protein) and CXCR4 immunofluorescence staining, the polyclonal rabbit anti-AQP1 antibody (Merck Millipore, Darmstadt, Germany), the monoclonal mouse MAP2 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) and the polyclonal goat CXCR4 antibody (Abcam, Cambridge, UK) were used at dilutions of 1:400, 1:200 and 1:100, respectively, following a standardized protocol. As secondary antibodies, goat anti-mouse IgG1 AlexaFluor 488 and goat anti-rabbit AlexaFluor 647 were used. Negative controls missing the primary antibody were included in every staining cycle. Slides were mounted using a ProLongVR Gold Antifade Mountant with DAPI (4′,6-diamidin-2-phenylindol) (Life Technologies, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Slides were analyzed with an Olympus BX43 microscope using CellSens software.

3. Results

We present the joint occurrence of two very rare diseases based on a patient presentation and immunochemical prognostic marker evaluation.
The female patient was born by primary caesarean section with a weight of 2490 g and an APGAR (Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity and Respiration) score of 3/6/6 at 38 + 3 weeks of gestation. The mother had been treated for hyperemesis gravidarum in the first trimester and mild hypertension during the course of pregnancy. Maternal serologies as well as medical history were inconspicuous. No other complications were reported until a routine ultrasound in the third trimester reported a suspicion of a congenital diaphragmatic hernia on the left side. MRI was performed during the 28th week of gestation, which confirmed a CDH with herniation of the intestines, the gut and the spleen through the left thoracic aperture. A lung-to-head ratio (LHR) of 2.3 and a lung volume on the left side of 2.5 mL were calculated. After further initial neonatal and cardiological evaluations, a thoracoscopic diaphragmatic hernia repair was attempted on the sixth day of life. The colon, small intestine and spleen were herniating into the thoracic cavity (Figure 1A). Furthermore, a mass resembling a lung sequester or an altered part of the liver was found that presented in close anatomical proximity to the aorta (Figure 2B). The mass was resected via a laparotomy. Hernia closure was achieved with a Gore-Tex® patch. Further intraoperative findings include the malrotation of the intestine.
A histopathological examination of the resected mass revealed liver metastases of a neuroblastoma (Table 1). Consecutively, urine analysis showed an increased vanillylmandelic acid (VMA)-to-creatinine ratio of 13.5 µmol/mmol (ref. < 11) and a normal homovallinic acid (HVA)-to-creatinine ratio of 10 µmol/mmol (ref. < 20). Post-operatively conducted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could distinguish a 2 × 1.4 × 1.4-cm retroperitoneal mass between the aorta and the inferior vena cava (Figure 1C). The MIBG (metaiodbenzylguanidin) scintigraphy showed a moderate enrichment of the described mass as well as multiple metastases in the liver. No signal enhancement was found in the bones and examination of the bone marrow was inconspicuous. Due to problems of the gastrointestinal passage, a re-laparotomy was performed. Adhesiolysis and a Nissen fundoplication were performed and the passage was restored. During this operation, a biopsy of the primary tumor was taken. In consideration of the immunohistochemical examination and the fluorescence in situ hybridization (Table 1) as well as the age of the patient and the results of the first pathological findings on the liver metastases, the tumor was defined as peripheral neuroblastoma, stage IV. The CGH array (comparative genomic hybridization) performed on the liver metastases at diagnosis showed no SCA (segmental chromosomal aberrations); therefore, the child received no immediate chemotherapy. The interdisciplinary tumor board agreed to start watchful waiting. The postoperative course was uneventful, without signs of recurrence, chylothorax or gastroesophageal reflux. The patient recovered well and consecutively showed sufficient weight gain.
Seven months later, a progression of the primary tumor was reported on MRI. The case was re-discussed by the interdisciplinary tumor board and the decision was made to retrieve a further biopsy of the primary tumor to rule out biological tumor changes. A CGH array was repeated on the primary tumor tissue and showed SCA (1p deletion). No immunohistochemical changes of the tumor were found. The key findings of the analysis of the biopsies are summarized in Table 1. On account of the progression and SCA, chemotherapy was indicated. According to the SIOPEN (International Society of Paediatric Oncology—Europe-Neurobalstoma/Low and Intermediate risk NEuroblaStoma)/LINES (protocol, a four-cycle chemotherapy with VP-16 (etoposide) and carboplatin was initiated). The chemotherapy was well tolerated and the patient showed a partial remission. At this time, surgical resection of the primary tumor was not an option and two further cycles of CADO (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine) were initiated. The re-evaluation showed a very good partial remission with a primary tumor <1 cm and no changes in the metastases. Due to the positive response, the girl is now under a close follow-up setting. Regarding lung development and respiratory function, she is developing very well. There are no clinical respiratory restrictions.

Immunohistochemical Analysis

The primary tumor showed histopathological characteristics of a poorly differentiated, Schwann cell-poor stroma with a proliferation rate (MIB1, E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase) of 40%, a low mitosis karyorrhexis index (INPC, International Neuroblastoma Pathology Classification) and <5% differentiating cells. The histological prognosis according to INPC is favorable. NMYC is not amplified and the tumor is synaptophysin-, chromogranin A- and neurofilament-positive.
AQP1 staining and hematoxylin counterstaining of the liver metastasis showed dissolution of the periportal structure in the tumor-infiltrated regions (Figure 2A). AQP1 positivity is observed in metastatic areas as well as in the vascular endothelium, in which it is expected to be physiologically positive (Figure 2B). Expression of AQP1 in metastatic cells could point to a more aggressive, metastatic cell phenotype in the metastatic cells, as demonstrated earlier by our group [21] (Huo et al., published February 2021, Front Cell Dev Biol.).
Immunofluorescence staining of AQP1, CXCR4 and MAP2 of the primary tumor revealed AQP1 expression in some but not all tumor areas, as well as staining of vascular structures in which AQP1 occurs physiologically (Figure 2C). Expression of CXCR4 as a marker for metastatic homing cannot be widely observed but is present in some tumor cells. MAP2 expression in some tumor areas could indicate a more mature neuronal phenotype. Despite the routine histological good prognosis, the tumor and metastases express features that have previously been associated with a more aggressive phenotype of neuroblastoma [21] (Huo et al., published February 2021, Front Cell Dev Biol.). This could explain the clinical progression and eventual need for chemotherapy.

4. Discussion

There are no explicit data connecting the occurrence of CDH with neuroblastoma in a neonate. Moreover, both diseases are classified as rare. Nonetheless, there are some hints in the literature that could indicate a common causality of these two disease entities. It has, for example, been shown that space-occupying lesions such as bronchopulmonary sequestration, ectopic liver and foregut duplication cysts are common pathological findings in neonates with congenital diaphragmatic hernia [22]. Furthermore, it has been described that children with congenital malformations have an increased risk for various malignancies [23]. It has also been suggested that neonatal tumors are more often associated with congenital abnormalities than other pediatric cancers [24].
Could the simultaneous occurrence of a neonatal tumor and a congenital malformation be connected by a common mechanism during embryological development? We will discuss aspects of embryogenesis, localization, retinoic acid-induced differentiation, NMYC-driven differentiation and disturbance of physiological processes by hypoxia as possible common mechanisms (Figure 3).

4.1. Embryogenesis

Normal development of the diaphragm occurs during the fifth and seventh week of gestation by the fusion of the mesenchymal septum transversum and the pleuroperitoneal folds (PPF) [25]. Key factors for the proper fusion of the PPF are the muscle progenitors which migrate from the somites into the PPF as well as the projection of the phrenic nerve from the C3–C5 segment into the PPF [26,27]. In approximately 30% of CDH cases, genetic causes can be identified. Today, a wide variety of genetic defects are known. Among these are disturbances of the retinoic acid pathway [28], which, in turn, has been shown to play a role in the differentiation of neuroblastoma. One of the most commonly used models to induce CDH in animal experiments is utilization of the teratogen nitrofen. It has been shown that between day 7 and day 20 of gestation in a rat model, the embryo undergoes an increased retinol metabolism and thus has an increased need for vitamin A during this time period [29]. Neuroblastoma, on the other hand, arises from the neural crest. Due to a not-yet fully understood mechanism, neuronal progenitor cells proliferate and permanently adapt a mostly undifferentiated phenotype. Vitamin A efficiently inhibits proliferation of neuroblastoma cells and leads to neuronal differentiation [30,31,32,33]. As 13-cis-retinoic acid, it is used as a maintenance therapy in high-risk neuroblastoma patients with minimal residual disease [34]. There are, however, no sufficient data on the hypothesis that, reciprocally, a lack of retinoic acid increases the risk of neuroblastoma development.

4.2. Localization

The primary tumor of our patient was located retroperitoneally in the space between the aorta and the inferior vena cava. The resected liver part was also found in close proximity to the aorta. It could, thus, be hypothesized that tumor development at this specific location could present a mechanical disturbance of the diaphragm during development. As another possible reason for mechanical disturbance, liver heterotopia can be found in the literature, although the coincidence of impaired diaphragm development and liver heterotopia is a rarely described condition [22]. Cruz et al. investigated the outcome of CDH with space-occupying lesions (SOLs) and enrolled 214 participants diagnosed with CDH. Of all the participants, nine were reported to have a liver heterotopia [22]. In a literature review published in 2019, Mito et al. reported no more than 19 cases of liver heterotopia associated with CDH. It is noteworthy that of the 19 described cases, none coincided with tumorization [25]. Neither article discussed an embryogenetic connection of CDH and ectopic liver.
The endodermal liver bud first appears three weeks after gestation and bone morphogenetic proteins released by the septum transversum lead to development of the liver [25]. An important chemo-attractant which determines the direction of liver development appears to be neurturin (NRTN), which is expressed by the ductus venosus. Ectopic production of NRTN may lead to ectopic liver development. However, a correlation to CDH has not been described [35].
The close anatomical proximity of the hepatobiliary system and the diaphragm leads to the hypothesis that a disturbance in either of the organs affects the development of the other. However, there is no explicit research regarding the mechanical disturbance in the embryogenesis of the diaphragm. In view of the unrelated time point of development, a correlation between these two occurrences seems unlikely but is not excluded regarding the current level of knowledge.

4.3. Retinoic Acid Pathway

Among the possible causes of CDH, disturbances of the retinoic acid pathway have been described [28], while retinoic acid is essential for neuronal differentiation. We hypothesize that a faulty retinoic acid pathway could be responsible for both diseases.
Retinoic acid as well as vitamin A play key roles in early physiological embryogenesis and organ development [36,37,38]. Disruption of the retinoic acid pathway has been shown to lead to faulty embryonic development and organ differentiation. It has also been shown to have a major effect on the differentiation of neuroblastoma cells [14]. It has thus been hypothesized that disruption of the retinoid acid pathway contributes to malformation of the diaphragm. There are several findings endorsing this theory. Early on, Anderson and his group found an increased incidence of CDH in young rats that underwent a vitamin A-deficient diet [39]. Experiments in which rats were supplemented with vitamin A during gestation showed a decreased incidence of CDH [39]. It has been shown that retinoid receptors are expressed on the developing diaphragm [40]. Retinoid receptor-null mutant mice lacking retinoid acid receptors showed an increased incidence of CDH.
Similarities were observed between nitrofen-induced diaphragmatic hernia formation and malformations arising from disturbance of the retinoic acid pathway [41]. An interference with the synthesis of retinoid acid by nitrofen can be assumed based on these data [41]. An explanation of the severe effect of nitrofen on the development of the diaphragm in these models may lay in the increased retinol metabolism, with several peaks of vitamin A accumulation between day seven and day twenty of gestation [29]. Thus, a higher susceptibility to changes in the retinoic pathway during this period seems possible [41]. This could be relevant for neuronal development and differentiation.
No link between neuroblastoma cell differentiation and CDH formation in the context of the retinoic acid pathway has been described until now. From the evidence discussed above, it seems, however, possible that disturbances in the retinoic acid pathway may result in both congential diaphragmatic hernia and neuroblastoma.

4.4. Influence of NMYC

NMYC protein expression in humans and in mice occurs physiologically in specific tissues at specific embryonic developmental stages and plays a pivotal role in embryonic development [42]. It is mostly found in tissues of the developing kidney, intestine, lung and heart [43,44]. Mutations of NMYC have been linked to these defects. NMYC expression is very low or absent in most adult tissues [43,44,45,46,47,48,49]. NMYC knockout mice die around E22.5 and display hypoplasia of different organs and tissues, including an underdeveloped central and peripheral nervous system and defects in lung branching and in the morphogenesis of the genitourinary system, stomach, intestine and limb buds [44,50,51,52,53,54]. NMYC induces the expression of several pluripotent genes in neuroblastoma and neuronal progenitor cells [55]. A knockdown of NMYC in neuronal tissues leads to an expansion of neuronal progenitor cells [56]. It has been suggested that NMYC function plays a vital role in controlling early differentiation in several tissues, including neuronal cells [47,49]. This has been supported by the finding that NMYC overexpression in the avian neural crest as well as in the murine neural crest leads to an increased generation of neurons [16,57]. In both studies, a downregulation of NMYC was suggested to be necessary for terminal differentiation of neurons.
However, the retinoic acid-induced differentiation in the context of neuroblastoma has been shown to be independent of NMYC [30,31,32,33,58,59]. Interestingly, there is evidence that the downregulation of NMYC precedes the retinoic acid-induced differentiation. It has, furthermore, been suggested that retinoic acid can directly regulate NMYC at the transcriptional level [32]. It has been shown that a knockdown of NMYC in neuroblastoma leads to morphological and biochemical neuronal differentiation [60,61,62]. Thus, NMYC may play a major role in maintaining an undifferentiated phenotype in neuroblastoma [15].
NMYC, therefore, can be considered as another key player in differentiation. Furthermore, in SH-EP Tet-21/N cells that were treated with tetracycline and, thus, do not amplify NMYC, we found that although NMYC is downregulated, several other adverse factors such as AQP1, HIF-1α and HIF-2α are upregulated [21].

4.5. Role of Hypoxia and Hypoxia-Associated Factors in Development

Hypoxia and especially the two hypoxia-inducible key regulators HIF-1α and HIF-2α have been established to be of importance in neuroblastoma progression and migration [63,64]. HIF-1α and HIF-2α have also been discussed to have a direct effect on the differentiation of neuroblasts [65,66,67]. It has, for example, been shown that hypoxia led to a de-differentiation of neuroblastoma cells that persisted for about 24 h after re-oxygenation [68]. The same group demonstrated that once neuroblastoma cells become hypoxic, they express a more immature and neural crest-like phenotype and, thus, contribute to malignancy [69,70].
An important factor which is upregulated by hypoxia in neuroblastoma and several other tumor tissues is the water channel AQP1 [21,71,72] (Huo et al., accepted January 2021). In the present case, APQ1 is expressed in the patient’s primary tumor as well as in the liver metastases. It has the capacity to transport water and plays a role in cell migration and adhesion [71]. We have previously shown that AQP1 expression leads to an increased migratory behavior of neuroblastoma cells through its upregulation under hypoxic conditions (Huo et al., published February 2021, Front Cell Dev Biol.). Furthermore, we have generated evidence that leads us to hypothesize that during a hypoxic window, cells are transforming towards an undifferentiated, migratory phenotype with an increased AQP1 expression [21]. Therefore, the hypoxia-dependent differentiation status of the cells could be a crucial factor in tumor development and progression of neuroblastoma.
As a possible factor in the development of CDH, hypoxia is not broadly discussed in the literature. One study on several hypoxia-inducible factors including HIF-1α and HIF-2α showed a lower expression of VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor) mRNA in CDH patients in the alveolar stage [73]. The authors hypothesize that this might play a role in the pathophysiology of CDH. As hypoxia is closely interlinked with NMYC expression as well as being associated with other congenital malformations such as intestinal atresia, future research should take hypoxia into account as a possible cause.

5. Conclusions

It is clear that the underlying processes leading to congenital malformation and neonatal tumors are not yet thoroughly understood. Induction by toxins, cell differentiation and the influence of retinoic acid and NMYC as well as of hypoxia on the development of either disease entity represent only some aspects. It is highly interesting that although the disease entities appear different at first glance, some of the proposed pathophysiological aspects of both malformations are overlapping. Especially disturbances of the retinoic acid pathway and NMYC expression can influence and disrupt cell differentiation in either disease. Due to the rarity of both diseases, interdisciplinary efforts and multi-center studies are needed to investigate the reasons for congenital malformations and their interlinkage with neonatal tumor disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.H., R.B. and S.J.G.; methodology, R.B., Z.H., B.B. and S.J.G.; validation, Z.H. and S.J.G.; formal analysis, R.B., Z.H., B.B. and S.J.G.; resources, S.J.G. and S.G.H.-C.; writing—original draft preparation, R.B., Z.H., B.B. and S.J.G.; writing—review and editing, Z.H., R.B., B.B., N.v.d.W., S.J.G. and S.G.H.-C.; supervision, S.J.G.; project administration, S.J.G.; funding acquisition, S.J.G. and Z.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The study was supported in part by research funding by the Stiftung pro UKBB (Univeristäres Kinderspital beider Basel), the University of Basel and the China Scholarship Council (CSC, 201706920049).

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the appropriate ethics committee (Ethikkommission Nordwest- und Zentralschweiz, EKNZ 2015-263).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

All data are presented in the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Global Genes. Available online: https://globalgenes.org/rare-facts/ (accessed on 20 February 2020).
  2. Orphanet. Available online: www.orpha.net (accessed on 20 February 2020).
  3. Regulation (EC) No 141/2000 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 1999 on Orphan Medicinal Products. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32000R0141 (accessed on 20 February 2020).
  4. Paoletti, M.; Raffler, G.; Gaffi, M.S.; Antounians, L.; Lauriti, G.; Zani, A. Prevalence and risk factors for congenital diaphragmatic hernia: A global view. J. Pediatric Surg. 2020, 55, 2297–2307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Dumpa, V.; Chandrasekharan, P. Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia; StatPearls: Treasure Island, FL, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  6. McGivern, M.R.; Best, K.E.; Rankin, J.; Wellesley, D.; Greenlees, R.; Addor, M.C.; Arriola, L.; de Walle, H.; Barisic, I.; Beres, J.; et al. Epidemiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia in Europe: A register-based study. Arch. Dis. Child Fetal. Neonatal. Ed. 2015, 100, F137–F144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Iritani, I. Experimental study on embryogenesis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Anat. Embryol. 1984, 169, 133–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Kluth, D.; Keijzer, R.; Hertl, M.; Tibboel, D. Embryology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Semin. Pediatric Surg. 1996, 5, 224–233. [Google Scholar]
  9. Greer, J.J.; Allan, D.W.; Babiuk, R.P.; Lemke, R.P. Recent advances in understanding the pathogenesis of nitrofen-induced congenital diaphragmatic hernia. Pediatric Pulmonol. 2000, 29, 394–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Liang, S.W.; Chen, G.; Luo, Y.G.; Chen, P.; Gu, J.H.; Xu, Q.Q.; Dang, Y.-W.; Qin, L.-T.; Lu, H.-P.; Huang, W.-T.; et al. Nomogram for predicting overall survival in children with neuroblastoma based on SEER database. Ann. Surg. Treat Res. 2020, 99, 118–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bosse, K.R.; Maris, J.M. Advances in the translational genomics of neuroblastoma: From improving risk stratification and revealing novel biology to identifying actionable genomic alterations. Cancer 2016, 122, 20–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Boeva, V.; Louis-Brennetot, C.; Peltier, A.; Durand, S.; Pierre-Eugene, C.; Raynal, V.; Etchevers, H.C.; Thomas, S.; Lermine, A.; Daudigeos-Dubus, E.; et al. Heterogeneity of neuroblastoma cell identity defined by transcriptional circuitries. Nat. Genet. 2017, 49, 1408–1413. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ohira, M.; Morohashi, A.; Inuzuka, H.; Shishikura, T.; Kawamoto, T.; Kageyama, H.; Nakamura, Y.; Isogai, E.; Takayasu, H.; Sakiyama, S.; et al. Expression profiling and characterization of 4200 genes cloned from primary neuroblastomas: Identification of 305 genes differentially expressed between favorable and unfavorable subsets. Oncogene 2003, 22, 5525–5536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Shipley, M.M.; Mangold, C.A.; Szpara, M.L. Differentiation of the SH-SY5Y Human Neuroblastoma Cell Line. J. Vis. Exp. JoVE 2016, 108, 53193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Westermark, U.K.; Wilhelm, M.; Frenzel, A.; Henriksson, M.A. The MYCN oncogene and differentiation in neuroblastoma. Semin. Cancer Biol. 2011, 21, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wakamatsu, Y.; Watanabe, Y.; Nakamura, H.; Kondoh, H. Regulation of the neural crest cell fate by N-myc: Promotion of ventral migration and neuronal differentiation. Development 1997, 124, 1953–1962. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Kang, J.H.; Rychahou, P.G.; Ishola, T.A.; Qiao, J.; Evers, B.M.; Chung, D.H. MYCN silencing induces differentiation and apoptosis in human neuroblastoma cells. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2006, 351, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Kaifi, J.T.; Yekebas, E.F.; Schurr, P.; Obonyo, D.; Wachowiak, R.; Busch, P.; Heinecke, A.; Pantel, K.; Izbicki, J.R. Tumor-cell homing to lymph nodes and bone marrow and CXCR4 expression in esophageal cancer. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2005, 97, 1840–1847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Russell, H.V.; Hicks, J.; Okcu, M.F.; Nuchtern, J.G. CXCR4 expression in neuroblastoma primary tumors is associated with clinical presentation of bone and bone marrow metastases. J. Pediatric Surg. 2004, 39, 1506–1511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ameis, H.M.; Drenckhan, A.; von Loga, K.; Escherich, G.; Wenke, K.; Izbicki, J.R.; Reinshagen, K.; Gros, S.J. PGK1 as predictor of CXCR4 expression, bone marrow metastases and survival in neuroblastoma. PLoS ONE 2013, 8, e83701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Pini, N.; Huo, Z.; Kym, U.; Holland-Cunz, S.; Gros, S.J. AQP1-Driven Migration Is Independent of Other Known Adverse Factors but Requires a Hypoxic Undifferentiated Cell Profile in Neuroblastoma. Children 2021, 8, 48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Cruz, S.M.; Akinkuotu, A.C.; Cass, D.L.; Lee, T.C.; Cassady, C.I.; Mehollin-Ray, A.R.; Ruano, R.; Welty, S.E.; Olutoye, O.O. Space occupying lesions in the presence of congenital diaphragmatic hernia. J. Pediatric Surg. 2016, 51, 710–713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Altmann, A.E.; Halliday, J.L.; Giles, G.G. Associations between congenital malformations and childhood cancer. A register-based case-control study. Br. J. Cancer 1998, 78, 1244–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Berbel Tornero, O.; Ortega Garcia, J.A.; Ferrisi Tortajada, J.; Garcia Castell, J.; Donati Colomer, J.; Soldin, O.P.; Fuster Soler, J.L. Neonatal tumours and congenital malformations. An. Pediatric 2008, 68, 589–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Mito, K.; Amano, Y.; Oshiro, H.; Matsubara, D.; Fukushima, N.; Ono, S. Liver heterotopia associated with congenital diaphragmatic hernia: Two case reports and a review of the literature. Med. Baltim. 2019, 98, e14211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Babiuk, R.P.; Zhang, W.; Clugston, R.; Allan, D.W.; Greer, J.J. Embryological origins and development of the rat diaphragm. J. Comp. Neurol. 2003, 455, 477–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Sefton, E.M.; Gallardo, M.; Kardon, G. Developmental origin and morphogenesis of the diaphragm, an essential mammalian muscle. Dev. Biol. 2018, 440, 64–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kardon, G.; Ackerman, K.G.; McCulley, D.J.; Shen, Y.; Wynn, J.; Shang, L.; Bogenschutz, E.; Sun, X.; Chung, W.K. Congenital diaphragmatic hernias: From genes to mechanisms to therapies. Dis. Model Mech. 2017, 10, 955–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Takahashi, Y.I.; Smith, J.E.; Goodman, D.S. Vitamin A and retinol-binding protein metabolism during fetal development in the rat. Am. J. Physiol. 1977, 233, E263–E272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Sidell, N.; Altman, A.; Haussler, M.R.; Seeger, R.C. Effects of retinoic acid (RA) on the growth and phenotypic expression of several human neuroblastoma cell lines. Exp. Cell Res. 1983, 148, 21–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sidell, N.; Sarafian, T.; Kelly, M.; Tsuchida, T.; Haussler, M. Retinoic acid-induced differentiation of human neuroblastoma: A cell variant system showing two distinct responses. Exp. Cell Biol. 1986, 54, 287–300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Wada, R.K.; Seeger, R.C.; Reynolds, C.P.; Alloggiamento, T.; Yamashiro, J.M.; Ruland, C.; Black, A.C.; Rosenblatt, J.D. Cell type-specific expression and negative regulation by retinoic acid of the human N-myc promoter in neuroblastoma cells. Oncogene 1992, 7, 711–717. [Google Scholar]
  33. Reynolds, C.P.; Kane, D.J.; Einhorn, P.A.; Matthay, K.K.; Crouse, V.L.; Wilbur, J.R.; Shurin, S.B.; Seeger, R.C. Response of neuroblastoma to retinoic acid in vitro and in vivo. Prog. Clin. Biol. Res. 1991, 366, 203–211. [Google Scholar]
  34. Ladenstein, R.; Potschger, U.; Pearson, A.D.J.; Brock, P.; Luksch, R.; Castel, V.; Yaniv, I.; Papadakis, V.; Laureys, G.; Malis, J.; et al. Busulfan and melphalan versus carboplatin, etoposide, and melphalan as high-dose chemotherapy for high-risk neuroblastoma (HR-NBL1/SIOPEN): An international, randomised, multi-arm, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2017, 18, 500–514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Tatsumi, N.; Miki, R.; Katsu, K.; Yokouchi, Y. Neurturin-GFRalpha2 signaling controls liver bud migration along the ductus venosus in the chick embryo. Dev. Biol. 2007, 307, 14–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Clagett-Dame, M.; DeLuca, H.F. The role of vitamin A in mammalian reproduction and embryonic development. Ann. Rev. Nutr. 2002, 22, 347–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Marlétaz, F.; Holland, L.Z.; Laudet, V.; Schubert, M. Retinoic acid signaling and the evolution of chordates. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2006, 2, 38–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ghyselinck, N.B.; Duester, G. Retinoic acid signaling pathways. Development 2019, 146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Andersen, D.H. Effect of diet during pregnancy upon the incidence of congenital hereditary diaphragmatic hernia in the rat; failure to produce cystic fibrosis of the pancreas by maternal vitamin A deficiency. Am. J. Pathol. 1949, 25, 163–185. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  40. Mendelsohn, C.; Lohnes, D.; Decimo, D.; Lufkin, T.; LeMeur, M.; Chambon, P.; Mark, M. Function of the retinoic acid receptors (RARs) during development (II). Multiple abnormalities at various stages of organogenesis in RAR double mutants. Development 1994, 120, 2749–2771. [Google Scholar]
  41. Greer, J.J.; Babiuk, R.P.; Thebaud, B. Etiology of congenital diaphragmatic hernia: The retinoid hypothesis. Pediatric Res. 2003, 53, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Hurlin, P.J. N-Myc functions in transcription and development. Birth Defects Res. C Embryo Today 2005, 75, 340–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zimmerman, K.A.; Yancopoulos, G.D.; Collum, R.G.; Smith, R.K.; Kohl, N.E.; Denis, K.A.; Nau, M.M.; Witte, O.N.; Toran-Allerand, D.; Gee, C.E.; et al. Differential expression of myc family genes during murine development. Nature 1986, 319, 780–783. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Stanton, B.R.; Perkins, A.S.; Tessarollo, L.; Sassoon, D.A.; Parada, L.F. Loss of N-myc function results in embryonic lethality and failure of the epithelial component of the embryo to develop. Genes Dev. 1992, 6, 2235–2247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Hirvonen, H.; Makela, T.P.; Sandberg, M.; Kalimo, H.; Vuorio, E.; Alitalo, K. Expression of the myc proto-oncogenes in developing human fetal brain. Oncogene 1990, 5, 1787–1797. [Google Scholar]
  46. Hirvonen, H.; Sandberg, M.; Kalimo, H.; Hukkanen, V.; Vuorio, E.; Salmi, T.T.; Alitalo, T. The N-myc proto-oncogene and IGF-II growth factor mRNAs are expressed by distinct cells in human fetal kidney and brain. J. Cell Biol. 1989, 108, 1093–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Mugrauer, G.; Alt, F.W.; Ekblom, P. N-myc proto-oncogene expression during organogenesis in the developing mouse as revealed by in situ hybridization. J. Cell Biol. 1988, 107, 1325–1335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. Grady, E.F.; Schwab, M.; Rosenau, W. Expression of N-myc and c-src during the development of fetal human brain. Cancer Res. 1987, 47, 2931–2936. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  49. Hirning, U.; Schmid, P.; Schulz, W.A.; Rettenberger, G.; Hameister, H. A comparative analysis of N-myc and c-myc expression and cellular proliferation in mouse organogenesis. Mech. Dev. 1991, 33, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Moens, C.B.; Stanton, B.R.; Parada, L.F.; Rossant, J. Defects in heart and lung development in compound heterozygotes for two different targeted mutations at the N-myc locus. Development 1993, 119, 485–499. [Google Scholar]
  51. Moens, C.B.; Auerbach, A.B.; Conlon, R.A.; Joyner, A.L.; Rossant, J. A targeted mutation reveals a role for N-myc in branching morphogenesis in the embryonic mouse lung. Genes Dev. 1992, 6, 691–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Sawai, S.; Shimono, A.; Hanaoka, K.; Kondoh, H. Embryonic lethality resulting from disruption of both N-myc alleles in mouse zygotes. New Biol. 1991, 3, 861–869. [Google Scholar]
  53. Sawai, S.; Shimono, A.; Wakamatsu, Y.; Palmes, C.; Hanaoka, K.; Kondoh, H. Defects of embryonic organogenesis resulting from targeted disruption of the N-myc gene in the mouse. Development 1993, 117, 1445–1455. [Google Scholar]
  54. Charron, J.; Malynn, B.A.; Fisher, P.; Stewart, V.; Jeannotte, L.; Goff, S.P.; Robertson, E.J.; Alt, F.W. Embryonic lethality in mice homozygous for a targeted disruption of the N-myc gene. Genes Dev. 1992, 6, 2248–2257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Cotterman, R.; Knoepfler, P.S. N-Myc regulates expression of pluripotency genes in neuroblastoma including lif, klf2, klf4, and lin28b. PLoS ONE 2009, 4, e5799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Knoepfler, P.S.; Cheng, P.F.; Eisenman, R.N. N-myc is essential during neurogenesis for the rapid expansion of progenitor cell populations and the inhibition of neuronal differentiation. Genes Dev. 2002, 16, 2699–2712. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Alam, G.; Cui, H.; Shi, H.; Yang, L.; Ding, J.; Mao, L.; Maltese, W.A.; Ding, H.-F. MYCN promotes the expansion of Phox2B-positive neuronal progenitors to drive neuroblastoma development. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 856–866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Thiele, C.J.; Reynolds, C.P.; Israel, M.A. Decreased expression of N-myc precedes retinoic acid-induced morphological differentiation of human neuroblastoma. Nature 1985, 313, 404–406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Abemayor, E.; Sidell, N. Human neuroblastoma cell lines as models for the in vitro study of neoplastic and neuronal cell differentiation. Environ. Health Perspect 1989, 80, 3–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Buechner, J.; Henriksen, J.R.; Haug, B.H.; Tomte, E.; Flaegstad, T.; Einvik, C. Inhibition of mir-21, which is up-regulated during MYCN knockdown-mediated differentiation, does not prevent differentiation of neuroblastoma cells. Differentiation 2011, 81, 25–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  61. Negroni, A.; Scarpa, S.; Romeo, A.; Ferrari, S.; Modesti, A.; Raschella, G. Decrease of proliferation rate and induction of differentiation by a MYCN antisense DNA oligomer in a human neuroblastoma cell line. Cell Growth Differ. 1991, 2, 511–518. [Google Scholar]
  62. Henriksen, J.R.; Haug, B.H.; Buechner, J.; Tomte, E.; Lokke, C.; Flaegstad, T.; Einvik, C. Conditional expression of retrovirally delivered anti-MYCN shRNA as an in vitro model system to study neuronal differentiation in MYCN-amplified neuroblastoma. BMC Dev. Biol. 2011, 11, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Semenza, G.L. Hypoxia-inducible factors: Mediators of cancer progression and targets for cancer therapy. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2012, 33, 207–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Pahlman, S.; Mohlin, S. Hypoxia and hypoxia-inducible factors in neuroblastoma. Cell Tissue Res. 2018, 372, 269–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Bhaskara, V.K.; Mohanam, I.; Rao, J.S.; Mohanam, S. Intermittent hypoxia regulates stem-like characteristics and differentiation of neuroblastoma cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e30905. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Cimmino, F.; Pezone, L.; Avitabile, M.; Acierno, G.; Andolfo, I.; Capasso, M.; Iolascon, A. Inhibition of hypoxia inducible factors combined with all-trans retinoic acid treatment enhances glial transdifferentiation of neuroblastoma cells. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 11158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Westerlund, I.; Shi, Y.; Toskas, K.; Fell, S.M.; Li, S.; Surova, O.; Södersten, E.; Kogner, P.; Nyman, U.; Schlisio, S.; et al. Combined epigenetic and differentiation-based treatment inhibits neuroblastoma tumor growth and links HIF2alpha to tumor suppression. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E6137–E6146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  68. Holmquist, L.; Jogi, A.; Pahlman, S. Phenotypic persistence after reoxygenation of hypoxic neuroblastoma cells. Int. J. Cancer 2005, 116, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  69. Jogi, A.; Ora, I.; Nilsson, H.; Lindeheim, A.; Makino, Y.; Poellinger, L.; Axelson, H.; Påhlman, S. Hypoxia alters gene expression in human neuroblastoma cells toward an immature and neural crest-like phenotype. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2002, 99, 7021–7026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  70. Jogi, A.; Vallon-Christersson, J.; Holmquist, L.; Axelson, H.; Borg, A.; Pahlman, S. Human neuroblastoma cells exposed to hypoxia: Induction of genes associated with growth, survival, and aggressive behavior. Exp. Cell Res. 2004, 295, 469–487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Papadopoulos, M.C.; Saadoun, S.; Verkman, A.S. Aquaporins and cell migration. Pflug. Arch. Eur. J. Physiol. 2008, 456, 693–700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Saadoun, S.; Papadopoulos, M.C.; Hara-Chikuma, M.; Verkman, A.S. Impairment of angiogenesis and cell migration by targeted aquaporin-1 gene disruption. Nature 2005, 434, 786–792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Van der Horst, I.W.; Rajatapiti, P.; van der Voorn, P.; van Nederveen, F.H.; Tibboel, D.; Rottier, R.; Reiss, I.; de Krijger, R.R. Expression of hypoxia-inducible factors, regulators, and target genes in congenital diaphragmatic hernia patients. Pediatric Dev. Pathol. 2011, 14, 384–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and neuroblastoma. Intraoperative situs at hernia repair. (A) Anatomical conditions in the patient regarding the congenital diaphragmatic hernia schematically (left panel) and on patient X-ray (right panel). Black arrow—regular right-sided diaphragm; blue arrow—left-sided diaphragmatic defect; red arrow—intrathoracic intestine. (B) The intraoperative situs at time of hernia repair in shown case. The edge of the diaphragm is marked by white arrows, the left lung is indicated by x and the metastatic liver segment reaching through the diaphragmatic defect by O. (C) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows the neuroblastoma retroperitoneally behind the liver and stomach in front of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava (left panel—coronal view; middle panel—sagittal view; right panel—transversal view). Close proximity is given to the liver and the great vessels. In each panel, the primary tumor is indicated by an arrow. MRI was performed after hernia repair.
Figure 1. Diagnosis of congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH) and neuroblastoma. Intraoperative situs at hernia repair. (A) Anatomical conditions in the patient regarding the congenital diaphragmatic hernia schematically (left panel) and on patient X-ray (right panel). Black arrow—regular right-sided diaphragm; blue arrow—left-sided diaphragmatic defect; red arrow—intrathoracic intestine. (B) The intraoperative situs at time of hernia repair in shown case. The edge of the diaphragm is marked by white arrows, the left lung is indicated by x and the metastatic liver segment reaching through the diaphragmatic defect by O. (C) Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) shows the neuroblastoma retroperitoneally behind the liver and stomach in front of the abdominal aorta and inferior vena cava (left panel—coronal view; middle panel—sagittal view; right panel—transversal view). Close proximity is given to the liver and the great vessels. In each panel, the primary tumor is indicated by an arrow. MRI was performed after hernia repair.
Children 08 00163 g001
Figure 2. H&E (Hematoxylin and Eosin) and immunohistochemical staining of primary tumor and metastases. (A) H&E staining of primary tumor shows histomorphological characteristics of poorly differentiated, Schwannian stroma poor neuroblastoma; (B) aquaporin 1 (AQP1) immunohistochemical staining and hematoxylin counterstaining of the liver metastases reveals dissolution of the periportal structure in the tumor-infiltrated regions. AQP1 positivity is observed in metastatic areas as well as in vascular endothelium (which can serve as an internal positive control). (C) AQP1, CXCR4 and MAP2 (microtubule associated protein) immunofluorescence staining of the primary tumor. Nuclei staining with DAPI (4′,6-diamidin-2-phenylindol). Next to AQP1, which is expressed in vascular structures as well as specific tumor areas, there is some expression of CXCR4 as a marker for metastatic homing as well as MAP2 expression in some areas indicating a more mature neuronal phenotype. Overall, tumor and metastases express experimental features that can be associated with a more aggressive phenotype.
Figure 2. H&E (Hematoxylin and Eosin) and immunohistochemical staining of primary tumor and metastases. (A) H&E staining of primary tumor shows histomorphological characteristics of poorly differentiated, Schwannian stroma poor neuroblastoma; (B) aquaporin 1 (AQP1) immunohistochemical staining and hematoxylin counterstaining of the liver metastases reveals dissolution of the periportal structure in the tumor-infiltrated regions. AQP1 positivity is observed in metastatic areas as well as in vascular endothelium (which can serve as an internal positive control). (C) AQP1, CXCR4 and MAP2 (microtubule associated protein) immunofluorescence staining of the primary tumor. Nuclei staining with DAPI (4′,6-diamidin-2-phenylindol). Next to AQP1, which is expressed in vascular structures as well as specific tumor areas, there is some expression of CXCR4 as a marker for metastatic homing as well as MAP2 expression in some areas indicating a more mature neuronal phenotype. Overall, tumor and metastases express experimental features that can be associated with a more aggressive phenotype.
Children 08 00163 g002
Figure 3. Schematic view of hypothesis: Possible influences on differentiation. The schematic view shows possible influences on physiological differentiation and development, including both possible pro-differentiation influences such as retinoic acid and NMYC as well as anti-differentiation influences such as nitrofen, other toxins and hypoxia. Timing and interaction of the physiologically occurring influences is essential in this developmental process. We hypothesize that a faulty differentiation at a specific time in development or recurring exposure to toxins can lead to the simultaneous occurrence of both CDH (congenital diaphragmatic hernia) and neuroblastoma. They might even arise from the same cause.
Figure 3. Schematic view of hypothesis: Possible influences on differentiation. The schematic view shows possible influences on physiological differentiation and development, including both possible pro-differentiation influences such as retinoic acid and NMYC as well as anti-differentiation influences such as nitrofen, other toxins and hypoxia. Timing and interaction of the physiologically occurring influences is essential in this developmental process. We hypothesize that a faulty differentiation at a specific time in development or recurring exposure to toxins can lead to the simultaneous occurrence of both CDH (congenital diaphragmatic hernia) and neuroblastoma. They might even arise from the same cause.
Children 08 00163 g003
Table 1. Analysis of the biopsies. The results of all biopsies led to the diagnosis of a favorable stage IV-S neuroblastoma.
Table 1. Analysis of the biopsies. The results of all biopsies led to the diagnosis of a favorable stage IV-S neuroblastoma.
BiopsyLocationTissueImmunohistochemicalFISHMGMT-STP27Hughes ClassificationEvans ClassificationEvaluation
1Thoracically herniated massLiver metastasisSynaptophysin +
Tyrosinhydroxylase +
NB84 +
NMYC not amplifiedUnmethylatedGrade 3 Poorly differentiated, stromal-poor neuroblastoma
2RetroperitonealPrimary tumorSynaptophysin +
Chromogranin A +
Neurofilament +
NMYC not amplified Stage 4-Spoorly differentiated, stromal-poor neuroblastoma
3RetroperitonealPrimary tumorChromogranin A + NMYC not amplified Stage 4-SPoorly differentiated, stromal-poor neuroblastoma
Note: FISH: Fluorescence in situ hybridization; MGMT: O6-methylguanin-DNA-methyltransferase.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Huo, Z.; Bilang, R.; Brantner, B.; von der Weid, N.; Holland-Cunz, S.G.; Gros, S.J. Perspective on Similarities and Possible Overlaps of Congenital Disease Formation—Exemplified on a Case of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Neuroblastoma in a Neonate. Children 2021, 8, 163. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8020163

AMA Style

Huo Z, Bilang R, Brantner B, von der Weid N, Holland-Cunz SG, Gros SJ. Perspective on Similarities and Possible Overlaps of Congenital Disease Formation—Exemplified on a Case of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Neuroblastoma in a Neonate. Children. 2021; 8(2):163. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8020163

Chicago/Turabian Style

Huo, Zihe, Remo Bilang, Benedikt Brantner, Nicolas von der Weid, Stefan G. Holland-Cunz, and Stephanie J. Gros. 2021. "Perspective on Similarities and Possible Overlaps of Congenital Disease Formation—Exemplified on a Case of Congenital Diaphragmatic Hernia and Neuroblastoma in a Neonate" Children 8, no. 2: 163. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8020163

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop