Next Article in Journal
Breastfeeding and Allergic Diseases: What’s New?
Next Article in Special Issue
Polish Medical Air Rescue Crew Interventions Concerning Neonatal Patients
Previous Article in Journal
Future Challenges in Research in Children with Neurodevelopmental Disorders
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Primary Imaging Modality in Children Presenting with Inflammatory Nontraumatic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation

Institute of Neuroradiology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, 60528 Frankfurt am Main, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 January 2021 / Revised: 15 April 2021 / Accepted: 20 April 2021 / Published: 23 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Considerations in Pediatric Emergency Medicine)

Abstract

:
Inflammatory nontraumatic atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation (AAS) in children is an often-missed diagnosis, especially in the early stages of disease. Abscess formation and spinal cord compression are serious risks that call for immediate surgical attention. Neither radiographs nor non-enhanced computed tomography (CT) images sufficiently indicate inflammatory processes. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) allows a thorough evaluation of paraspinal soft tissues, joints, and ligaments. In addition, it can show evidence of vertebral distraction and spinal cord compression. After conducting a scoping review of the literature, along with scientific and practical considerations, we outlined a standardized pediatric MRI protocol for suspected inflammatory nontraumatic AAS. We recommend contrast-enhanced MRI as the primary diagnostic imaging modality in children with signs of torticollis in combination with nasopharyngeal inflammatory or ear nose and throat (ENT) surgical history.

1. Introduction

Non-traumatic rotatory atlantoaxial subluxation (AAS) was first described in 1830 by Sir Charles Bell. He reported AAS in a patient suffering from a deep syphilitic ulcer of the pharynx [1]. The condition was later named after the Frenchman Pierre Grisel (1869–1959) who reported two patients with AAS coinciding with nasopharyngeal inflammation [2]. Since then, acquired Grisel syndrome has been described after otorhinolaryngological surgical procedures such as tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy [2,3,4,5], after nasopharyngeal soft tissue inflammation, Kawasaki syndrome (cervical lymphadenopathy, necrotizing microvasculitis with fibrinoid necrosis of mucosa of mouth and throat), and retropharyngeal abscess secondary to pulmonary tuberculosis [6,7,8]. Grisel syndrome is primarily found in the pediatric population with 68% of cases occurring in patients under the age of 12 years [9] and a total of 90% under the age of 21 [10]. The disease’s apparent age-dependency led to the introduction of a two-hit hypothesis [11]. A pre-existing cervical ligamentous laxity and longer alar ligaments in the pediatric population resulting in an atlas-dens interval that ranges up to 4.5 mm (adults 2.5 to 3 mm) could serve as a predisposition (“first hit”) [12]. The “second hit” could be caused by immune cells and inflammatory mediators that develop and maintain inflammatory response in pharyngeal tissue and spread through pharyngovertebral veins. Pharyngovertebral veins link posterior nasopharyngeal veins to the periodontoid vascular plexus. The plexus serves as drainage for the posterosuperior pharyngeal region. The lack of lymph nodes in the plexus allows a spread of the inflammatory response from the upper pharyngeal region to the atlantoaxial area. Inflammatory mediators can cause synovial and vascular engorgement, periligamentous inflammation, and edema, all of which might increase laxity of the transverse and alar ligaments [13]. Under normal circumstances, the posterior fibers of the alar ligaments retain the odontoid process in contact with the atlas and prevent anterior dislocation of the atlas on the axis [14]. The hypothesis of a “second hit” has been morphologically supported by a case report by Park et al. [15], who described enhancement of tissues surrounding the cervical spine on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) at initial diagnosis and its resolution on follow-up MRI three weeks later. MRI findings corresponded with the clinical presentation and resolution of torticollis in the patient.
The underlying pathophysiological principles suggest that MRI with its high sensitivity for soft tissue alterations is suitable as a primary diagnostic imaging modality for evaluation in Grisel syndrome. Nevertheless, radiographs and three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) are still methods of choice in many hospitals. We hypothesize that a combination of patient history, clinical findings, and standardized MRI allows early diagnostic success in this often-missed diagnosis and prevents exposure of children to ionizing radiation.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. MR Imaging

MRI with its high sensitivity for soft tissue alterations has become the preferred modality for evaluation of the spinal cord, ligaments, and paraspinal soft tissues [16]. It allows assessment of paranasal sinuses, mastoid air cells, nasopharyngeal and upper neck soft tissue, transverse and alar ligaments, joint capsules of the cervical spine, as well as the cervical spinal cord. Inflammatory lesions of the upper neck or even abscess formation, periligamentous inflammation and edema, synovial inflammation, and laxity of the transverse and alar ligaments may support clinically suspected diagnosis of Grisel syndrome and facilitate treatment decisions. In the case of abscess formation, size and extent of fluid collection can be assessed as a preoperative measure.
J. William Fielding, a clinical professor of orthopedic surgery, classified the rotatory subluxations of the atlantoaxial joint and described four lesion types that are shown in Figure 1. In Fielding Types III and IV, spinal cord compression may be present on MRI. Since clinical evaluation of damage to the dorsal column-medial lemniscus pathway and the spinothalamic tract can be difficult in young children, imaging plays an important role in diagnostics. According to Fielding et al., neurological complications occur in approximately 15% of cases. They can range from radiculopathy to myelopathy and may even be fatal [17]. Spinal cord lesions require surgical treatment with decompression and arthrodesis.
Initial diagnosis can be complimented by follow-up MRI of inflammatory lesions and abscesses for evaluation of treatment effects. Interventional MRI can be performed in case a therapeutic orthopedic procedure is indicated [18].

2.2. MRI Protocol

We performed a search in PubMed seeking all reports published until June 1st 2020 and examined all articles indexed with the medical subject or expert key words “Grisel syndrome” and “MRI” with text availability, “full text”. We included studies that mentioned or displayed the MRI sequences used for clinical diagnosis. Articles published in non-English languages were excluded. Eighteen studies met the inclusion criteria. 10/18 studies acquired T2-weighted (T2w) images in the sagittal plane, 5/18 studies in the axial plane and 4/18 studies in the coronal plane, making T2w images the most commonly used sequences. Post-contrast T1-weighted (T1w) images were again most commonly acquired in the sagittal plane with 7/18 studies. 4/7 studies used fat saturation in post contrast imaging. Details on included reports are shown in Table S1 [5,7,15,16,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32].

3. Results

Based on the synthesized findings of our topic-based scoping review, and along with scientific and practical considerations, we outlined a standardized MRI protocol (Table 1) for suspected inflammatory nontraumatic AAS. The protocol can be applied to children of all ages. It can be used to support initial diagnosis and for routine follow-up. As a trade-off between large tissue coverage and the small size of spinal structures, 2D sequences were recommended with a maximum slice thickness of 3 mm [33]. For smaller children, a slice thickness of 2 mm should be considered. Minimum recommended sequences include sagittal and axial 2D T2-weighted (T2w) turbo spin echo (TSE), coronal 2D Turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) with short inversion time for fat suppression of bone marrow, sagittal pre contrast agent (CA), as well as sagittal, axial and coronal post CA 2D T1-weighted (T1w) TSE sequences. Scan time at 1.5 T amounts to approximately 23 min.
In case of insufficient image quality of 2D T2w sequences, 3D sequences utilizing balanced steady-state free precession (b-SSFP) such as constructive interference in steady-state (CISS) and fast imaging employing steady-state acquisition with phase cycling (FIESTa–c) are recommended. These sequences offer the ability to image with submillimeter spatial resolution [34].

Illustration of Three Pediatric Cases of MRI in Inflammatory Nontraumatic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation

Case 1: Patient history: Eleven-year-old patient with prior pharyngitis and cervical lymphadenopathy a month prior to acute torticollis. Three months had passed before the patient was referred to our hospital for further diagnosis. MRI findings are presented in Figure 2.
Case 2: Patient history: Three-year-old patient with otolaryngological surgical procedure (nasal polypectomy) and postsurgical development of torticollis. Six weeks had passed before patient was referred to our hospital for further diagnosis. MRI findings are presented in Figure 3.
Case 3: Patient history: Six-year-old patient with prior pharyngitis and cervical lymphadenopathy prior to acute torticollis. Referral to our hospital after unsuccessful treatment with oral antibiotics from primary care physician. MRI findings are presented in Figure 4.

4. Discussion

The selection of an imaging modality in possible nontraumatic atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation is always preceded by clinical considerations [3,16,17,18]. Highly suggestive are a recent history of otorhinolaryngological surgical procedures (i.e., tonsillectomy and adenoidectomy) or an infection in the upper aerodigestive tract (i.e., tonsillitis). In addition, there should be typical clinical findings: a characteristic head position of 20° of tilt to one side, 20° of rotation to the opposite side, and slight flexion (torticollis). Laboratory findings are usually non-specific. Patients may show elevated C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and leucocyte counts in the first days of torticollis, followed by subsequent normalization of these parameters. Fever is rarely present.
Common imaging modalities include radiographs, CT, and MRI. The fixed posture in torticollis often causes technical difficulties obtaining correct radiographic projections in awake children. These technical limitations reduce their clinical importance compared to other modalities. In addition, radiographs are of minimal value in the first 4 weeks of disease, although flexion-extension views may be suggestive [35]. CT and MRI scans usually confirm the presence of rotational dislocation or anterior subluxation. Using CT, especially the dynamic solution with three scans in different head positions, exposes the often young patients to considerable levels of ionizing radiation [36,37]. It is therefore of high interest to reduce CT exposure settings in pediatric patients. Neither radiographs nor non-enhanced CT images sufficiently indicate inflammatory processes with possible abscess formation or myelopathy. MRI is well suited for the evaluation of nasopharyngeal regions of interest in Grisel syndrome. At the same time, MRI is adequate for visualizing atlantoaxial subluxation and spinal cord compression. Once diagnosis is established and in case a therapeutic orthopedic procedure is indicated, a reduction maneuver (maximal head rotation to the right first and then to the left during traction) can be performed immediately under general anesthesia with the patient lying in the scanner in a supine position. In this case, a single T2w sequence after the maneuver ensures a fast-operating time with reliable diagnostic accuracy [18].
Considering MRI as primary modality, it must be taken into account that especially smaller children can have a difficult time tolerating the unusual environment, loud noises, and the need to lie still [38]. In an emergency setting such as Grisel syndrome with acute inflammation, distraction and mock MR training techniques may not be applicable. It is therefore important to weigh pediatric sedation risks against radiation risks. In a meta-analysis conducted with data from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium of pediatric sedation/anesthesia encounters outside of the operating theater (>60% radiological procedures), serious adverse events were rare and no deaths occurred. Events that have the potential to harm and may require timely rescue interventions occurred once per 89 sedation encounters but could be well managed by a team of specialized care takers.
The standard diagnostic protocol we suggest can be acquired in approximately 20 min and weighs image quality/resulting diagnostic accuracy against scan time. Ligaments and symmetry of the odontoid lateral mass and anterior atlantodental interval are usually best evaluated on T2w sequences. Both fast spinecho inversion-recovery and T2w sequences are sensitive for bone marrow edema [39]. These advantages are reflected in the common use of both sequences in literature. T1w sequences without and with CA delineate the anatomy and pathologic conditions of the retropharyngeal and prevertebral spaces [40]. The protocol allows for image subtraction on the sagittal plane to identify contrast enhancing tissue and rim enhancement of abscess formation. Subtraction imaging is a technique whereby an unenhanced T1w sequence is digitally subtracted from the identical sequence performed after CA administration [41]. Post CA fat saturated T1w sequences were not included in the protocol, because the time required for application of the saturation pulse would substantially increase the imaging time [42]. However, as revealed by our literature review, some radiologists prefer the usage of fat saturated images for diagnostic work up. An alternative to 2D T1w sequences without and with contrast on sagittal plane are contrast-enhanced chemical shift techniques (Dixon) combining three echoes acquired at different echo times to create water-only and fat-only images [43].

5. Conclusions

We weighed pediatric sedation risks against radiation risks and MRI advantages over CT evaluating paraspinal soft tissues, joints, ligaments, and signs of spinal cord compression. In conclusion, we recommend contrast-enhanced MRI as the primary diagnostic modality in children with signs of torticollis in combination with nasopharyngeal inflammatory or ENT surgical history.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/children8050329/s1, Supplementary Table S1: Details on included studies in scoping review of MRI in Grisel syndrome.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.P. and K.J.W.; methodology, K.J.W.; formal analysis, K.J.W.; data curation, L.P. and K.J.W.; writing—original draft preparation, K.J.W.; writing—review and editing, L.P., E.H., K.J.W.; visualization, K.J.W.; supervision, L.P. and E.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Ethical review and approval were waived for this study due to anonymized patient information and no inclusion of images that may identify the individual patient.

Informed Consent Statement

Patient consent was waived due to anonymized patient information and no inclusion of images that may identify the individual patient.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Dirheimer, Y. The Craniovertebral Region in Chronic Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1977; ISBN 978-3-642-66605-6. [Google Scholar]
  2. Grisel, P. Enucleation de l’atlas et Torticollis Nasopharyngien. PresseMed 1930, 59, 1647–1648. [Google Scholar]
  3. Barcelos, A.C.E.S.; Patriota, G.C.; Netto, A.U. Nontraumatic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation: Grisel Syndrome. Case Report and Literature Review. Glob. Spine J. 2014, 4, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Spennato, P.; Nicosia, G.; Rapanà, A.; Cicala, D.; Donnianni, T.; Scala, S.; Aliberti, F.; Cinalli, G. Grisel Syndrome Following Adenoidectomy: Surgical Management in a Case with Delayed Diagnosis. World Neurosurg. 2015, 84, 1494.e7–1494.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Pavlidis, E.; Copioli, C.; Spagnoli, C.; Mazzotta, S.; Ormitti, F.; Crisi, G.; Pisani, F. A Painful Stiff Neck Following an Ear, Nose, and Throat Surgical Procedure: Case Report. Neuropediatrics 2015, 46, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wood, A.J.; Singh-Grewal, D.; De, S.; Gunasekera, H. Kawasaki Disease Complicated by Subluxation of Cervical Vertebrae (Grisel Syndrome). Med. J. Aust. 2013, 199, 494–496. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Lee, J.K.; Oh, C.H.; Park, H.-C.; Yoon, S.H. Grisel’s Syndrome Induced by Mycobacterium Tuberculosis. Korean J. Spine 2015, 12, 84–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Martins, J.; Almeida, S.; Nunes, P.; Prata, F.; Lobo, M.L.; Marques, J.G. Grisel Syndrome, Acute Otitis Media, and Temporo-Mandibular Reactive Arthritis: A Rare Association. Int. J. Pediatr. Otorhinolaryngol. 2015, 79, 1370–1373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Gourin, C.G.; Kaper, B.; Abdu, W.A.; Donegan, J.O. Nontraumatic Atlanto-Axial Subluxation after Retropharyngeal Cellulitis: Grisel’s Syndrome. Am. J. Otolaryngol. 2002, 23, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wilson, B.C.; Jarvis, B.L.; Haydon, R.C. Nontraumatic Subluxation of the Atlantoaxial Joint: Grisel’s Syndrome. Ann. Otol. Rhinol. Laryngol. 1987, 96, 705–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Battiata, A.P.; Pazos, G. Grisel’s Syndrome: The Two-Hit Hypothesis—A Case Report and Literature Review. Ear Nose Throat J. 2004, 83, 553–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Kraft, M.; Tschopp, K. Evaluation of Persistent Torticollis Following Adenoidectomy. J. Laryngol. Otol. 2001, 115, 669–672. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yu, K.K.; White, D.R.; Weissler, M.C.; Pillsbury, H.C. Nontraumatic Atlantoaxial Subluxation (Grisel Syndrome): A Rare Complication of Otolaryngological Procedures. Laryngoscope 2003, 113, 1047–1049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gray’s Anatomy: The Anatomical Basis of Clinical Practice, 39th ed.; Gray, H.; Standring, S.; Ellis, H.; Berkovitz, B.K.B. (Eds.) Elsevier Churchill Livingstone: Edinburgh, NY, USA, 2005; ISBN 978-0-443-07168-3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Park, S.-H.; Park, S.-H.; Lee, S.-H. Grisel Syndrome: Pathophysiological Evidence from Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings. Ann. Rehabil. Med. 2013, 37, 713–716. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Harth, M.; Mayer, M.; Marzi, I.; Vogl, T.J. Lateral Torticollis on Plain Radiographs and MRI: Grisel Syndrome. Eur. Radiol. 2004, 14, 1713–1715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Fielding, J.W.; Hawkins, R.J. Atlanto-Axial Rotatory Fixation. (Fixed Rotatory Subluxation of the Atlanto-Axial Joint). J. Bone Jt. Surg. Am. 1977, 59, 37–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hannonen, J.; Perhomaa, M.; Salokorpi, N.; Serlo, W.; Sequeiros, R.B.; Sinikumpu, J. Interventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging as a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Method in Treating Acute Pediatric Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation. Exp. Ther. Med. 2019, 18, 18–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Ugur, H.C.; Cağlar, S.; Unlu, A.; Erdem, A.; Kanpolat, Y. Infection-Related Atlantoaxial Subluxation in Two Adults: Grisel Syndrome or Not? Acta Neurochir. 2003, 145, 69–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Wurm, G.; Aichholzer, M.; Nussbaumer, K. Acquired Torticollis Due to Grisel’s Syndrome: Case Report and Follow-up of Non-Traumatic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation. Neuropediatrics 2004, 35, 134–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Panopalis, P.; Christopoulos, S.; Churchill-Smith, M.; Chankowsky, J.; Ménard, H.A. Grisel’s Syndrome: Non-Traumatic Subluxation of the Atlantoaxial Joint. J. Rheumatol. 2005, 32, 1619. [Google Scholar]
  22. Yamazaki, M.; Someya, Y.; Aramomi, M.; Masaki, Y.; Okawa, A.; Koda, M. Infection-Related Atlantoaxial Subluxation (Grisel Syndrome) in an Adult with Down Syndrome. Spine 2008, 33, E156–E160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Salpietro, V.; Polizzi, A.; Granata, F.; Briuglia, S.; Mankad, K.; Ruggieri, M. Upper Respiratory Tract Infection and Torticollis in Children: Differential Diagnosis of Grisel’s Syndrome. Clin. Neuroradiol. 2012, 22, 351–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Di Cola, F.; Cutilli, T.; Paulis, D.D.; Galzio, R.J. Image-Guided Transoral Biopsy in a Boy with Grisel’s Syndrome. J. Clin. Neurosci. 2013, 20, 901–903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Reichman, E.F.; Shah, J. Grisel Syndrome: An Unusual and Often Unrecognized Cause of Torticollis. Pediatr. Emerg. Care 2015, 31, 577–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kourelis, K.; Haronis, V.; Konandreas, I.; Kontrafouri, A.; Asimakopoulos, A. Atypical Post-Adenoidectomy Grisel’s Syndrome in Crouzon Child with Kyphotic Skull Base. Auris Nasus Larynx 2015, 42, 416–418. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Allegrini, D.; Autelitano, A.; Nocerino, E.; Fogagnolo, P.; De Cillà, S.; Rossetti, L. Grisel’s Syndrome, a Rare Cause of Anomalous Head Posture in Children: A Case Report. BMC Ophthalmol. 2016, 16, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Ozalp, H.; Hamzaoglu, V.; Avci, E.; Karatas, D.; Ismi, O.; Talas, D.U.; Bagdatoglu, C.; Dagtekin, A. Early Diagnosis of Grisel’s Syndrome in Children with Favorable Outcome. Childs Nerv. Syst. 2019, 35, 113–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Fath, L.; Cebula, H.; Santin, M.N.; Coca, A.; Debry, C.; Proust, F. The Grisel’s Syndrome: A Non-Traumatic Subluxation of the Atlantoaxial Joint. Neurochirurgie 2018, 64, 327–330. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Chua, A.J.K.; Tan, B.W.S.; Tan, T.Y.; Heah, H.H.W. Grisel’s Syndrome in an Adult after Endoscopic Nasopharyngectomy. Laryngoscope Investig. Otolaryngol. 2019, 4, 504–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Spinnato, P.; Aparisi Gomez, M.P.; Molinari, M.; Mercatelli, D.; Bazzocchi, A. Torticollis After a Somersault: A Case of Grisel’s Syndrome. Indian J. Pediatr. 2019, 86, 198–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Chryssikos, T.; Pratt, N.; Howie, B.; Mushlin, H.; Sansur, C. Open Reduction and Decompression of Atlantoaxial Subluxation with Basilar Impression Due to Grisel Syndrome Using the Cervical Management Base Unit. World Neurosurg. 2020, 138, 129–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saunders, D.E.; Thompson, C.; Gunny, R.; Jones, R.; Cox, T.; Chong, W.K. Magnetic Resonance Imaging Protocols for Paediatric Neuroradiology. Pediatr. Radiol. 2007, 37, 789–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Li, Z.; Chen, Y.A.; Chow, D.; Talbott, J.; Glastonbury, C.; Shah, V. Practical Applications of CISS MRI in Spine Imaging. Eur. J. Radiol. Open 2019, 6, 231–242. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Bissonnette, B. (Ed.) Syndromes: Rapid Recognition and Perioperative Implications, 2nd ed.; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-259-86178-9. [Google Scholar]
  36. Banerjee, P.; Thomas, M. CT Scans to Exclude Spine Fractures in Children after Negative Radiographs May Lead to Increase in Future Cancer Risk. Eur. J. Orthop. Surg. Traumatol. 2019, 29, 983–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Brenner, D.; Elliston, C.; Hall, E.; Berdon, W. Estimated Risks of Radiation-Induced Fatal Cancer from Pediatric CT. AJR Am. J. Roentgenol. 2001, 176, 289–296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Dong, S.-Z.; Zhu, M.; Bulas, D. Techniques for Minimizing Sedation in Pediatric MRI. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019, 50, 1047–1054. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Benedetti, P.F.; Fahr, L.M.; Kuhns, L.R.; Hayman, L.A. MR Imaging Findings in Spinal Ligamentous Injury. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2000, 175, 661–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Debnam, J.M.; Guha-Thakurta, N. Retropharyngeal and Prevertebral Spaces: Anatomic Imaging and Diagnosis. Otolaryngol. Clin. N. Am. 2012, 45, 1293–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Eid, M.; Abougabal, A. Subtraction Images: A Really Helpful Tool in Non-Vascular MRI. Egypt. J. Radiol. Nucl. Med. 2014, 45, 909–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Delfaut, E.M.; Beltran, J.; Johnson, G.; Rousseau, J.; Marchandise, X.; Cotten, A. Fat Suppression in MR Imaging: Techniques and Pitfalls. RadioGraphics 1999, 19, 373–382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Ma, J. Dixon Techniques for Water and Fat Imaging. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2008, 28, 543–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Fielding Classification of Atlantoaxial Subluxation (AAS) [17].
Figure 1. Fielding Classification of Atlantoaxial Subluxation (AAS) [17].
Children 08 00329 g001
Figure 2. MRI shows edematous swelling and contrast enhancement of the posterior naso-, oro- and hypopharyngeal soft tissue (A,B); arrows; 2D T1w TSE pre and post CA. No abscess formation present. Enlarged cervical lymphnodes (C); asterisks; 2D T1w TSE post CA. Increased anterior atlantodental interval (D); dotted arrows; 2D T2w TSE. Asymmetry of odontoid lateral mass interval at midlateral mass level (C); line. Laxity of the transverse ligament of atlas (D); arrowheads. No spinal cord compression. T2w = T2-weighted; TSE = turbo spin echo; T1w = T1-weighted; CA = contrast agent.
Figure 2. MRI shows edematous swelling and contrast enhancement of the posterior naso-, oro- and hypopharyngeal soft tissue (A,B); arrows; 2D T1w TSE pre and post CA. No abscess formation present. Enlarged cervical lymphnodes (C); asterisks; 2D T1w TSE post CA. Increased anterior atlantodental interval (D); dotted arrows; 2D T2w TSE. Asymmetry of odontoid lateral mass interval at midlateral mass level (C); line. Laxity of the transverse ligament of atlas (D); arrowheads. No spinal cord compression. T2w = T2-weighted; TSE = turbo spin echo; T1w = T1-weighted; CA = contrast agent.
Children 08 00329 g002
Figure 3. MRI shows edematous swelling and contrast enhancement of the posterior nasopharyngeal soft tissue with extension to anterior atlanto-occipital membrane and the cruciate ligament (A,B); arrows; 2D T1w TSE pre and post CA. Contrast enhancement of the left longus capitis (C); asterisk; 2D T1w TSE post CA signaling inflammation. No abscess formation present. Fixed rotation of C1 and C2 (C); dotted arrows; 2D T1w TSE post CA and synovial inflammation. Laxity of the transverse ligament of atlas (D); arrowhead; 2D T2w TSE. No spinal cord compression. T2w = T2-weighted; TSE = turbo spin echo; T1w = T1-weighted; CA = contrast agent.
Figure 3. MRI shows edematous swelling and contrast enhancement of the posterior nasopharyngeal soft tissue with extension to anterior atlanto-occipital membrane and the cruciate ligament (A,B); arrows; 2D T1w TSE pre and post CA. Contrast enhancement of the left longus capitis (C); asterisk; 2D T1w TSE post CA signaling inflammation. No abscess formation present. Fixed rotation of C1 and C2 (C); dotted arrows; 2D T1w TSE post CA and synovial inflammation. Laxity of the transverse ligament of atlas (D); arrowhead; 2D T2w TSE. No spinal cord compression. T2w = T2-weighted; TSE = turbo spin echo; T1w = T1-weighted; CA = contrast agent.
Children 08 00329 g003
Figure 4. MRI shows edematous swelling of the posterior naso-, oro- and hypopharyngeal soft tissue with extension to the cruciate ligament (A); 2D T2w TSE. Joint effusion in the anterior synovial compartment of the dens seen as high T2 signal (B); arrow; 2D T2w TSE. No abscess formation present. Forward movement of C1 with increased anterior atlantodental interval (A); dotted arrows. No spinal cord compression; 2-week follow-up with appropriate empiric antibiotic regimen shows full regression of joint effusion (C); 2D T2w TSE. T2w = T2-weighted; TSE = turbo spin echo; T1w = T1-weighted; CA = contrast agent.
Figure 4. MRI shows edematous swelling of the posterior naso-, oro- and hypopharyngeal soft tissue with extension to the cruciate ligament (A); 2D T2w TSE. Joint effusion in the anterior synovial compartment of the dens seen as high T2 signal (B); arrow; 2D T2w TSE. No abscess formation present. Forward movement of C1 with increased anterior atlantodental interval (A); dotted arrows. No spinal cord compression; 2-week follow-up with appropriate empiric antibiotic regimen shows full regression of joint effusion (C); 2D T2w TSE. T2w = T2-weighted; TSE = turbo spin echo; T1w = T1-weighted; CA = contrast agent.
Children 08 00329 g004
Table 1. Standardized MRI (Diagnosis and Routine Follow-Up). Suggested standard protocol with a duration of approximately 23 min scan time at 1.5 Tesla (T). For smaller children, a slice thickness of 2 mm should be considered.
Table 1. Standardized MRI (Diagnosis and Routine Follow-Up). Suggested standard protocol with a duration of approximately 23 min scan time at 1.5 Tesla (T). For smaller children, a slice thickness of 2 mm should be considered.
SequencePlaneSlice ThicknessPixel SizeTR; TE; Number of AveragesTrans-mitting CoilReceiving CoilComment
2D T2w TSEsagittal3 mm1 mm3800; 84; 2bodyneckAim to include nasopharyngeal and upper neck soft tissue, mastoid air cells and if possible paranasal sinus FOV
2D TIRMcoronal; planning on sagittal plane, block position angled parallel to cervical spine3 mm1 mm3800; 33; 2bodyneckShort inversion time (160 ms) for fat suppression of bone marrow
2D T1w TSEsagittal3 mm1 mm550; 9.5; 3bodyneck
2D T2w TSEaxial; planning on sagittal plane, block position angled perpendicular to cervical spine3 mm1 mm4500; 84; 2bodyneckInclude at least craniocervical transition to C3 and any pathological region on sagittal plane
2D T1w TSE post CAsagittal3 mm1 mm550; 9.5; 3bodyneck
2D T1w TSE post CAaxial; planning on sagittal plane, block position angled perpendicular to cervical spine3 mm1 mm550; 9.9; 2bodyneckinclude at least craniocervical transition to C3 and any pathological region on sagittal plane
2D T1w TSE post CAcoronal; planning on sagittal plane, block position angled parallel to cervical spine3 mm1 mm524; 17; 2bodyneck
T2w = T2-weighted; TSE = turbo spin echo; TIRM = turbo inversion recovery magnitude; FOV = field of view; STIR = short-TI inversion recovery; T1w = T1-weighted; CA = contrast agent.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wenger, K.J.; Hattingen, E.; Porto, L. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Primary Imaging Modality in Children Presenting with Inflammatory Nontraumatic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation. Children 2021, 8, 329. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8050329

AMA Style

Wenger KJ, Hattingen E, Porto L. Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Primary Imaging Modality in Children Presenting with Inflammatory Nontraumatic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation. Children. 2021; 8(5):329. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8050329

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wenger, Katharina J., Elke Hattingen, and Luciana Porto. 2021. "Magnetic Resonance Imaging as the Primary Imaging Modality in Children Presenting with Inflammatory Nontraumatic Atlantoaxial Rotatory Subluxation" Children 8, no. 5: 329. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/children8050329

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop