Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
CuII Complexes and Coordination Polymers with Pyridine or Pyrazine Amides and Amino Benzamides—Structures and EPR Patterns
Previous Article in Journal
Erratum: Hadjixenophontos, E.; et al. A Review of the MSCA ITN ECOSTORE—Novel Complex Metal Hydrides for Efficient and Compact Storage of Renewable Energy as Hydrogen and Electricity. Inorganics 2020, 8, 17
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Silver Cyanoguanidine Nitrate Hydrate: Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½ H2O, a Cyanoguanidine Compound Coordinating by an Inner Nitrogen Atom

1
Chair of Solid-State and Quantum Chemistry, Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, RWTH Aachen University, D-52056 Aachen, Germany
2
Hoffmann Institute of Advanced Materials, Shenzhen Polytechnic, 7098 Liuxian Blvd, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518055, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 5 November 2020 / Revised: 16 November 2020 / Accepted: 17 November 2020 / Published: 24 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Cornerstones in Contemporary Inorganic Chemistry)

Abstract

:
Silver(I) cyanoguanidine nitrate hydrate, Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O, was synthesized as the first cyanoguanidine solid-state complex in which monovalent Ag is coordinated through inner nitrogen N atoms. Its structure was characterized by single-crystal X-ray diffraction, crystallizing in the acentric orthorhombic space group P21212 with a = 10.670(3) Å, b = 18.236(5) Å, and c = 3.5078(9) Å. The differing chemical bondings of Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O and Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 were compared on the basis of first-principle calculations.

1. Introduction

Cyanoguanidine, also called dicyandiamide, is not only the dimer of molecular cyanamide (or carbodiimide) but also a commercially important compound that has found medicinal and industrial applications [1,2,3,4] and has long been known to crystallographers. The molecule has also been widely used as a precursor for synthesizing organonitrogen compounds [5]. It exists in two tautomeric forms, differing in the protonation and bonding of its nitrogen atoms (Figure 1). The structural conformations of both forms are planar with one tautomer displaying two terminal amine groups (Figure 1a) and the other expressing only one terminal amine group but two imine groups in the middle of the molecule (Figure 1b). The coordination chemistry of cyanoguanidine has earned significant attention owing to these differing functional groups [6,7,8,9,10,11], which readily coordinate late transition metals, forming complexes with monovalent [6] and divalent copper [7], silver [8,11], and divalent zinc [9,10], all of which have been structurally characterized. As alluded to in Figure 1, the inner N atoms as well as the terminal N atoms are able, at least in principle, to coordinate to metal atoms due to the existence of lone pairs at those N atoms. However, to the best of our knowledge, all reported metal cyanoguanidine compounds involve a coordination only with the terminal cyano N atoms of the cyanoguanidine molecules.
In an attempt to grow high-quality Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 single crystals by slow diffusion, we unexpectedly made the discovery of the title compound Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O. Here, we report the synthesis and crystal structure of this silver(I) cyanoguanidine nitrate hydrate, the first example of a metal cyanoguanidine compound coordinating with inner nitrogen atoms.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structure Description

The crystal structure was analyzed by single-crystal XRD. Ag(C2N4H4)NO3 ·½H2O crystallizes in the orthorhombic space group P21212 (No. 18) with a = 10.670(3) Å, b = 18.236(5) Å, and c = 3.5078(9) Å, as well as four formula units per cell (Figure 2a). The Ag atom is coordinated by two terminal N3 atoms, one inner N2 atom, and two O atoms of the nitrate group, O1 and O2, in a distorted square-pyramidal environment (Figure 2b). One of the Ag–N3 bonds is 2.283(8) Å (symmetry code: 1−x, 1−y, 1+z), which is lengthwise consistent with those given in the literature [8], while the other Ag–N3 bond of 2.543(8) Å (symmetry code: 1−x, 1−y, z) is somewhat longer and also weaker than the preceding one. The Ag–N2, Ag–O1, and Ag–O2 distances are 2.277(7) Å, 2.444(7) Å, and 2.733(8) Å, respectively, and within the expected distance range of Ag–N and Ag–O single bonds [8,12,13]. The elongated Ag–N3 bond probably results from further coordinative interactions of the type Ag···N and Ag···O (Ag–N2, Ag–N3, and Ag–O1) [8]. As we have discussed in the previous section, the cyanoguanidine molecule exists in two tautomeric forms (Figure 1), and here the C2–N4 and C2–N5 bond lengths come very close to 1.32 Å, a result strongly suggestive of the first form with two terminal amine groups (Figure 1a), the N4–C2–N5 angle also being almost 120°. Additional selected bond lengths and angles are given in Table 1.
The cyanoguanidine unit may act both as an acceptor (cyanimine, =N–C≡N) and as a donor (amine, –NH2), resulting in four different hydrogen bonding modes. The first is a contact between the amine group and nitrate (N4–H4B···O1, N4–H4B···O3, N4–H4B···N1), the second an interaction between the amine group and neighboring nitrate (N5–H5A···O3, N5–H5B···O2), and the third an interaction between a nitrate O atom and a water O atom (O1W–H1···O1). Finally, there is hydrogen bonding between the amine group and a water O atom (N4–H4A···O1W). The entire complex is linked by hydrogen bonds forming a three-dimensional structure (Figure 3). The hydrogen bonds are listed in Table 2.

2.2. Chemical Bonding Analysis

As the discovery of Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O was a consequence of preparing yet another silver cyanoguanidine nitrate, Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 [8], questions of chemical equilibrium as regards the energetic competition between the two phases pop up, so their structural and bonding character was analyzed in more detail. As shown in Figure 2b, the Ag atom in Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O is surrounded by two amine and one imine N atoms of the H4C2N4 molecule and also two O atoms of the nitrate anion, while the Ag atom in Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 is surrounded by five amine N atoms. Additionally, a comparison of the bond lengths (Figure 4) indicates that the Ag–N bonds are shorter in Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 than the Ag–N and Ag–O bonds in Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O.
In order to quantitatively probe the relative stability of these phases, crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analyses were performed to study the bonding mechanisms, as shown in Figure 5. Note that the integrated COHP (ICOHP) up to the Fermi level measures covalency, with more negative ICOHP values corresponding to stronger bonding interactions. Figure 5 reveals that the enhanced stability of Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3, compared with Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O, appears to arise from the increased strength of the two short Ag–N bonds in Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 (ICOHP = −1.58 eV for Ag–N1 and −1.31 eV for Ag–N5), which are significantly stronger than the two short Ag–N bonds in Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O (−1.08 eV for Ag–N2 and −1.14 eV for Ag–N3). Furthermore, we note that the inner Ag–N2 mode in Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O is weaker than the terminal Ag–N3 interaction despite being slightly shorter. It seems, therefore, that the inner N coordination mode is less strongly bonding than equivalent terminal N bonds, thus explaining the preferential formation of Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 over Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O and the absence of other metal cyanoguanidines that coordinate with inner N atoms.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Synthesis

Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O was prepared by mixing aqueous solutions of AgNO3 (339.7 mg, 2 mmol in 20 mL; Alfa, Kandel, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany) and H4C2N4 (504.0 mg, 2 mmol in 20 mL; Alfa, Kandel, Rheinland-Pfalz, Germany). This reaction yielded a large amount of white precipitate that was isolated by filtration and washed with water before being dried under vacuum. The product was then recrystallized by dissolving 0.5 g in 20 mL water and stirring for 1 h. Colorless, transparent needle-like crystals were obtained after water evaporation. It should be noted that attempts to grow high-quality single crystals by evaporation were hindered by the preferential formation of yet another silver cyanoguanidine compound, Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 [8], whose crystal structure was clarified many years ago. In order to help understand this preferential formation, electronic structure calculations were performed as detailed below.

3.2. Single-Crystal Diffraction

A selected crystal was mounted on a glass fiber. Intensity data were collected with a Bruker SMART APEX CCD detector (Bruker AXS GmbH, Karlsruhe, Germany) equipped with an Incoatec microsource (Mo-Kα radiation, λ = 0.71073 Å, multilayer optics). The software package SHELXL-2014 (Version 2014/7, George M. Sheldrick, Göttingen, Germany) [14,15] was used to solve and refine the crystal structure. Full details concerning the structure determination are available in CIF format and have been deposited under the CCDC entry number 1973094. Further crystallographic details can be found in the Supplementary Materials. Copies of the data can be obtained free of charge via https://www.ccdc.cam.ac.uk/Community/csd-communications/ or from the CCDC, 12 Union Road, Cambridge CB2 1EZ, U.K.; Fax: + 44-1223-336033; E-mail: [email protected].

3.3. Chemical Bonding Analysis

The chemical bonding analysis was performed using the LOBSTER package (Version 3.2.0, Richard Dronskowski, Aachen, Germany) [16,17,18,19], starting from a static self-consistency calculation using the entire k-mesh with the symmetry switched off. For bonding analysis, the “pbevaspfit2015” basis set including 1s orbitals for hydrogen, 2s and 2p orbitals for nitrogen, carbon, and oxygen, and the 5s, 4p, and 4d orbitals for silver was employed.

4. Conclusions

The first silver(I) cyanoguanidine nitrate in which silver is coordinated by inner imine nitrogen atoms was prepared by mixing aqueous solutions of AgNO3 and H4C2N4. LOBSTER calculations were used to compare the chemical bonding interactions of Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O and Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 such as to explain the limited stability of Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O. ICOHP analysis reveals that the inner N interaction in Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3·½H2O is somewhat weaker than equivalent terminal N bonding modes, thereby explaining the propensity for terminal N bonding in metal cyanoguanidines.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/2304-6740/8/12/64/s1: The CIF and the checkCIF output files.

Author Contributions

The manuscript was written through contributions of all authors. Conceptualization, X.Q.; Methodology, X.Q.; Software, X.Q. and D.L.; Validation, X.Q.; Formal Analysis, X.Q., A.J.C. and D.L.; Investigation, X.Q.; Resources, R.D.; Data Curation, R.D., X.Q. and A.J.C.; Writing-Original Draft Preparation, X.Q.; Writing-Review & Editing, R.D., A.J.C. and X.Q.; Visualization, X.Q., A.J.C.; Supervision, R.D.; Project Administration, R.D.; Funding Acquisition, R.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

We thank Markus Mann and George Ogutu for synthetic assistance. We also thank Tobias Storp for assistance with the single-crystal X-ray diffraction measurement. Furthermore, we thank the IT Center of RWTH Aachen University for the provision of computing time.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barrio, J.; Volokh, M.; Shalom, M. Polymeric carbon nitrides and related metal-free materials for energy and environmental applications. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 11075–11116. [Google Scholar]
  2. Williams, P.; Ferrer, E.G.; Baeza, N.; Piro, O.E.; Castellano, E.E.; Baran, E.J. Transition metal promoted addition of methanol to cyanoguanidine. Molecular structure and properties of the generated copper(II) and nickel(II) complexes. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2005, 631, 1502–1506. [Google Scholar]
  3. Kose, M.; Duman, S.E.; McKee, V.; Akyol, I.; Kurtoglu, M. Hydrogen bond directed 1D to 3D structures of square-planar Ni(II) complexes and their antimicrobial studies. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2017, 462, 281–288. [Google Scholar]
  4. Gungor, O.; Kurtar, S.K.; Koçer, F.; Kose, M. A guanylurea ligand and its Cu(II), Ni(II) and Zn(II) complexes: Antibacterial activities and DNA binding properties. Inorg. Nano Met. Chem. 2020, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Albertin, G.; Antoniutti, S.; Castro, J. Preparation of diethycyanamide and cyanoguanidine complexes of iridium. ChemistrySelect. 2018, 3, 11054–11058. [Google Scholar]
  6. Begley, M.J.; Hubberstey, P.; Russell, C.E.; Walton, P.H. Bis(µ-pyridazine)-bis[(2-cyanoguanidine)copper(I)] cation: A molecule containing two co-ordinatively unsaturated copper(I) centres. J. Chem. Soc. Dalton Trans. 1994, 17, 2483–2488. [Google Scholar]
  7. Begley, M.J.; Hubberstey, P.; Stroud, J. Copper(II)-diethylenetriamine complexes with monodentate N-donor ligands: Crystal and molecular structure of diethylenetriamine 2-cyanoguanidine copper(II) nitrate. Polyhedron 1997, 16, 805–813. [Google Scholar]
  8. Dronskowski, R.; Liu, X.H. Bis(cyanoguanidine) silver(I) nitrate-cyanoguanidine(1/1). Acta Cryst. C 2003, 59, m243–m245. [Google Scholar]
  9. Fowkes, A.; Harrison, W.T.A. A monoclinic polymorph of dichlorobis(cyanoguanidine) zinc(II). Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2005, 61, m2021–m2022. [Google Scholar]
  10. Ritche, L.K.; Harrison, W.T. A catena-Poly[[dichlorozinc(II)]-μ-cyanoguanidine]. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. E 2007, 63, m617–m618. [Google Scholar]
  11. Bessler, K.E.; Sousa, A.T.; Deflon, V.M.; Niquet, E. Silver complexes with cyanoguanidine: Preparation and crystal structures of (Ag(cgn)2)F and (Ag(cgn)2) (BF4). Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2003, 629, 1091–1095. [Google Scholar]
  12. Meyer, P.; Rimsky, A.; Chevalier, R. Structure d’une phase du nitrate d’argent instable à température et pression ordinaires. Acta Cryst. B 1976, 32, 1143–1146. [Google Scholar]
  13. Meyer, P.; Rimsky, A.; Chevalier, R. Structure du nitrate d’argent à pression et température ordinaires. Exemple de cristal parfait. Acta Cryst. B 1978, 34, 1457–1462. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sheldrick, G.M. A short history of SHELX. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. A 2008, 64, 112–122. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sheldrick, G.M. Crystal structure refinement with SHELXL. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. C 2015, 71, 3–8. [Google Scholar]
  16. Deringer, V.L.; Tchougréeff, A.L.; Dronskowski, R. Crystal orbital Hamilton population (COHP) analysis as projected from plane-wave basis sets. J. Phys. Chem. A 2011, 115, 5461–5466. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  17. Maintz, S.; Deringer, V.L.; Tchougréeff, A.L.; Dronskowski, R. Analytic projection from plane-wave and PAW wavefunctions and application to chemical-bonding analysis in solids. J. Comput. Chem. 2013, 34, 2557–2567. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  18. Dronskowski, R.; Blöchl, P.E. Crystal orbital Hamilton populations (COHP): Energy-resolved visualization of chemical bonding in solids based on density-functional calculations. J. Phys. Chem. 1993, 97, 8617–8824. [Google Scholar]
  19. Nelson, R.; Ertural, C.; George, J.; Deringer, V.L.; Hautier, G.; Dronskowski, R. LOBSTER: Local orbital projections, atomic charges, and chemical-bonding analysis from projector-augmented-wave-based density-functional theory. J. Comput. Chem. 2020, 41, 1931–1940. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The two tautomeric forms of cyanoguanidine H4C2N4 with (a) one tautomer displaying two terminal amine groups and (b) only one terminal amine group.
Figure 1. The two tautomeric forms of cyanoguanidine H4C2N4 with (a) one tautomer displaying two terminal amine groups and (b) only one terminal amine group.
Inorganics 08 00064 g001
Figure 2. (a) Crystal structure of Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O and (b) coordination environment of Ag.
Figure 2. (a) Crystal structure of Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O and (b) coordination environment of Ag.
Inorganics 08 00064 g002
Figure 3. (a) The three-dimensional hydrogen-bond network in Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O along c and (b) a selection of hydrogen bonds along a.
Figure 3. (a) The three-dimensional hydrogen-bond network in Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O along c and (b) a selection of hydrogen bonds along a.
Inorganics 08 00064 g003
Figure 4. Bond-length histogram of Ag(H4C2N4)NO3·½H2O (top) and Ag(H4C2N4)3NO3 (bottom).
Figure 4. Bond-length histogram of Ag(H4C2N4)NO3·½H2O (top) and Ag(H4C2N4)3NO3 (bottom).
Inorganics 08 00064 g004
Figure 5. COHP analysis of various bonds in Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 (left) and Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O (right).
Figure 5. COHP analysis of various bonds in Ag(C2N4H4)3NO3 (left) and Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O (right).
Inorganics 08 00064 g005
Table 1. Selected bond lengths and angles in Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O.
Table 1. Selected bond lengths and angles in Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½H2O.
Bond Length (Å)Bond Angle (°)
Ag1–N2 2.277(7)O2–N1–O3 120.9(8)
Ag1–N3 (−½+x, ½−y, −z) 2.283(8)O2–N1–O1 119.1(7)
Ag1–O1 2.444(7)O3–N1–O1 119.9(8)
Ag1–N3 (−½+x, ½−y, 1−z) 2.543(8)C1–N2–C2 116.2(7)
O1–N1 1.257(10)C2–N4–H4A 120(4)
O2–N1 1.244(9)C2–N4–H4B 114(4)
O3–N1 1.242(9)H4A–N4–H4B 120(4)
N2–C1 1.316(10)C2–N5–H5A 127(5)
N2–C2 1.357(12)C2–N5–H5B 117(5)
N3–C1 1.152(10)H5A–N5–H5B 115(4)
N4–C2 1.324(12)N3–C1–N2 176.5(11)
N4–H4A 1.004(13)N5–C2–N4 120.4(9)
N4–H4B 1.002(13)N5–C2–N2 116.6(9)
N5–C2 1.324(10)N4–C2–N2 122.9(7)
N5–H5A 1.008(13)H1–O1W–H1 105(2)
N5–H5B 1.009(13)
O1W–H1 (x, y, z) 0.976(13)
O1W–H1(1−x, 1−y, 1−z) 0.976(13)
Table 2. Hydrogen-bonding geometry (Å, °).
Table 2. Hydrogen-bonding geometry (Å, °).
D−Hd(D−H)d(H·A)<DHAd(D·A)ASymmetry Code
N4−H4A1.004(13)2.13(6)136(6)2.939(11)O1W
N4−H4B1.002(13)2.29(5)135(6)3.075(10)O1x+½, y+½, −z+1
N4−H4B1.002(13)2.13(5)148(8)3.028(10)O3x+½, y+½, −z+1
N4−H4B1.002(13)2.54(4)156(8)3.477(11)N1x+½, y+½, −z+1
N5−H5A1.008(13)2.20(5)149(7)3.107(10)O3x−½, −y+½, −z+1
N5−H5B1.009(13)2.32(6)137(5)3.132(11)O2x−½, −y+½, −z
O1W−H10.976(13)2.15(6)146(9)3.007(10)O1x+½, y+½, −z
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Qiao, X.; Corkett, A.J.; Luo, D.; Dronskowski, R. Silver Cyanoguanidine Nitrate Hydrate: Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½ H2O, a Cyanoguanidine Compound Coordinating by an Inner Nitrogen Atom. Inorganics 2020, 8, 64. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/inorganics8120064

AMA Style

Qiao X, Corkett AJ, Luo D, Dronskowski R. Silver Cyanoguanidine Nitrate Hydrate: Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½ H2O, a Cyanoguanidine Compound Coordinating by an Inner Nitrogen Atom. Inorganics. 2020; 8(12):64. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/inorganics8120064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Qiao, Xianji, Alex J. Corkett, Dongbao Luo, and Richard Dronskowski. 2020. "Silver Cyanoguanidine Nitrate Hydrate: Ag(C2N4H4)NO3·½ H2O, a Cyanoguanidine Compound Coordinating by an Inner Nitrogen Atom" Inorganics 8, no. 12: 64. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/inorganics8120064

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop