Next Article in Journal
Evaluating the Mechanical Properties, and Calcium and Fluoride Release of Glass-Ionomer Cement Modified with Chicken Eggshell Powder
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Amorphous Calcium Phosphate Administration on Dental Sensitivity during In-Office and At-Home Interventions
Previous Article in Journal
Green Tea Polyphenol Epigallocatechin-3-Gallate-Stearate Inhibits the Growth of Streptococcus mutans: A Promising New Approach in Caries Prevention
Previous Article in Special Issue
Survey on Nursing Home Caregivers’ Basic Knowledge of Oral Health Management: Dental Terminology
Article

Enamel Roughness Changes after Removal of Orthodontic Adhesive

1
Department of Orthodontics and Biomaterials, Centro Universitário UDF, Brasília, DF 70390-045, Brazil
2
Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Orthopedics, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria, RS 97015-372, Brazil
3
Department of Children’s Clinic—Orthodontics, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Araraquara, SP 14801-903, Brazil
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Received: 28 June 2018 / Revised: 31 July 2018 / Accepted: 1 August 2018 / Published: 6 August 2018
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Dental Hygiene and Epidemiology)
The aim of this study was to evaluate enamel roughness, quality of the enamel surfaces and time duration comparing different orthodontic adhesive removal protocols. Premolars were used to test three adhesive removal methods (n = 20): five-blade carbide bur, 30-blade carbide bur, and ultrasonic diamond bur. Bracket was bonded using TransbondTM XT adhesive. Roughness with different parameters was measured before bracket bonding and after adhesive remnants removal. Micromorphological analysis of enamel surface (n = 5) was performed by SEM images and categorized in enamel damage index—“perfect”; “satisfying”; “imperfect”; and “unacceptable”. Time was measured in seconds. All removal methods caused increased roughness in relation to Ra, Rq, and Rz parameters (X axis) comparing to healthy enamel surface. Enamel surface resulted from removal using five-blade burs was scored as satisfactory. Carbide bur groups decreased the roughness values of Ra, Rq, and Rz parameters on the Y axis and enamel surface was considered unacceptable. The 30-blade group increased symmetry (Rsk) and flattening (Rku) parameters of roughness and surface was scored as unsatisfactory. Diamond bur removed adhesive in 54.8 s, faster than five-blade carbide bur. The five-blade bur group resulted in less enamel roughness than the 30-blade and diamond groups. View Full-Text
Keywords: dental enamel; orthodontic brackets; dental bonding; dental debonding dental enamel; orthodontic brackets; dental bonding; dental debonding
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Degrazia, F.W.; Genari, B.; Ferrazzo, V.A.; Santos-Pinto, A.D.; Grehs, R.A. Enamel Roughness Changes after Removal of Orthodontic Adhesive. Dent. J. 2018, 6, 39. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/dj6030039

AMA Style

Degrazia FW, Genari B, Ferrazzo VA, Santos-Pinto AD, Grehs RA. Enamel Roughness Changes after Removal of Orthodontic Adhesive. Dentistry Journal. 2018; 6(3):39. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/dj6030039

Chicago/Turabian Style

Degrazia, Felipe W., Bruna Genari, Vilmar A. Ferrazzo, Ary D. Santos-Pinto, and Renésio A. Grehs 2018. "Enamel Roughness Changes after Removal of Orthodontic Adhesive" Dentistry Journal 6, no. 3: 39. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/dj6030039

Find Other Styles
Note that from the first issue of 2016, MDPI journals use article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop