Next Article in Journal
Influence of the Microalga Chlorella vulgaris on the Growth and Metabolic Activity of Lactobacillus spp. Bacteria
Next Article in Special Issue
Non-Destructive Imaging and Spectroscopic Techniques for Assessment of Carcass and Meat Quality in Sheep and Goats: A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Legumes in Extrusion Cooking: A Review
Previous Article in Special Issue
Effects of Farm Management Practices and Transport Time on Post-Mortem Changes of Longissimus lumborum Muscle Proteins in Suckling Goat Kids
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Sheep and Goat Meat Processed Products Quality: A Review

1
Mountain Research Centre (CIMO), Escola Superior Agrária/Instituto Politécnico de Bragança, Campus Sta Apolónia Apt, 1172 5301-855 Bragança, Portugal
2
Veterinary and Animal Research Centre (CECAV) Universidade Trás-os-Montes e Alto Douro, Quinta de Prados, 5000-801 Vila Real, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 24 June 2020 / Revised: 13 July 2020 / Accepted: 15 July 2020 / Published: 20 July 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sheep and Goat Meat Processing and Quality)

Abstract

:
Even though sheep and goat processed meat products are not as popular as pork, beef or poultry and are generally considered not as important, they have a very important role in meat consumption around the world. A concise review of the origin and type of the most important sheep and goat processed meat products produced in different countries and world regions is made. The manuscript also summarizes the most recent studies on sheep and goat processed meats on the physicochemical characterizations, sensory quality, microbiological quality and safety. Some conclusions and future trends in production, processing and commercial potentiality for sheep and goat processed meat products are discussed. Several possibilities exist to make them more diversified and appealing to the market. Processing meat from culled animals is an interesting way to value animals with low market acceptability. Some as fermented sausages, cured legs and pâtés have great commercial potential as highly acceptable consumer commodities. An interesting field of food research is the rediscovery of a new generation of goat and sheep meat products as functional foods that will respond to the constant innovation required by the meat industry. Everything related to food safety must be considered in the future.

1. Introduction

Despite not being the most consumed meat in the world, in the decade from 1994 to 2004, there was a notable increase of 75% and 42% in the production of sheep and goats, respectively, with a trend that continued until 2018 [1]. Countries with a long tradition of consuming sheep and goat meat also consume many products, such as hams, sausages and pates, or other processed products. Many of these products correspond to ancient methods of preserving meat at a time when there was no other way of preserving than curing with salts, air drying or smoking. Smoking, drying and salting are the oldest ways to preserve the meat, and particularly, some of them are nowadays recognized as protected origin designation (POD) or geographical protected indication (GPI) brands, as has been mentioned by Teixeira and Rodrigues [2]. Some of them are linked to the peculiar consumption traditions of some countries. For example, in Northern Europe, particularly in Scandinavian countries, there are typical and traditional dry-cured sheep and goat meat products, such as Fenalår and Pinnekjøtt in Norway or Hangikjøt and Skerpikjøt in Iceland and the Faeroe Islands [3]. In countries where the religious traditions prohibit the use of pork meat in processed Halal products, meat and fatty tissues from sheep and goats, as well as the tail fat from sheep breeds, are used, as in Turkish sucuk [4] and the Algerian, Moroccan and Tunisian Kaddid or Gueddid [5]. In the Northeast of Brazil, specifically in Petrolina-Pernambuco but, also, in Ceará, the carcasses of boneless and semi-dehydrated sheep and goats and, recently, the product called “Manta de Petrolina” have been distinguished as cultural heritage and registered as a quality brand. In some Mediterranean European countries, young lambs and kids producing light carcasses are highly appreciated by consumers, and many of them are very popular PDO (protected designation origin) or PGI (protected geographical indication) brands [6]. The meat of sheep and goats coming out of these quality marks, as well as culled animals, are cured and processed, producing popular products such as the Spanish Cecina de castron [7] or the Italian violin di capra [8]. Recently, studies on the use of goat and sheep meats in the production of new processed products and methods [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17] confirm the importance of research and innovation as key factors in advances in the production of sheep and goats, particularly in the control of food processes, physicochemical characterization, food safety and the sensorial properties of new products [18]. Thus, the purpose of this review is to summarize the most recent studies on the quality of sheep and goat processed meat products and to contribute to a better awareness and spreading the information about these products.

2. Sheep and Goat Meat Processed Products

The need to preserve meat for later consumption dates back to ancient times. Salting, drying and smoking are the oldest forms to preserve and keep meat in the world. Fermentation and ripening together is another efficient methodology with no cooling required or other processes of meat preservation also used a long time ago to increase the shelf life.
Currently, the processing of meat is not exclusively for the need for preservation but, mostly, to satisfy consumer demand and the acceptability for products with traditional palatability and flavor characteristics. Given the huge variety of existing products industrial or handmade-manufactured, we decided to group the products into three groups: dried and semi-dried products, sausages and cooked or precooked prepared products.

2.1. Dried and Semi-Dried Products

All products that are naturally or artificially dehydrated, salted, cured, smoked or not will be considered as dry and semidry products. Some fermented sausages with short or longer ripening periods will also be part of this group.
In South America, dried meat strips from several animal species, including sheep and goats exposed to sun, wind and smoke, are called jerky or charqui. According to Fadda and Vignolo [19], the charqui is made from small pieces of fresh meat salted and pressed for several days, dried and with most of the water removed and that can be stored for several months without the need for refrigeration. In Northern Brazil, it is very common to have goat and sheep charqui called Carne de sol. In Northeast Brazil, ripened and cured goat or sheep meat locally known as manta correspond to a deboned carcass, only maintaining the rib bones and cutting the main muscles into thin meat layers, exposing them, resembled a blanket (manta is the Portuguese word that means blanket) that is lightly salted and hung in boxes protected with anti-fly nets and sun-dried. The most famous product is the Manta de Petrolina and the CYTED (Programa Iberoamericano de Ciencia y Tecnología para el Desarrollo) Iberian American Network of Quality Brands of Ibero American Meat and Meat Products (MARCARNE), which sponsored and promoted events in the past two years to recognize and protect its geographical designation.
One of Norway’s most important dry-cured meat products, with a long tradition of consumption since the time of the Vikings, is Fenalår, a dry-cured ram leg or mutton, and the Pinnekjøtt, a dry-cured side of lamb or mutton [3]. The designation Fenalår derives from the old Norwegian words fenad and lår used to designate mutton and leg. Legs are brine- or pickle-curing. Traditionally the salted legs were dried and hanging from pillars in storehouses and smoked, but today, production plants with control of the temperature, relative humidity and air velocity are used. Smoke today is slightly used only to add taste and flavor. The Pinnekjøtt is a dry-cured meat from the side of lamb or mutton placed in boxes in layers of meat and coarse salt for 1.5 to 3–4 days and rinsed in freshwater to prevent the salt precipitation during the dry period: 10 to 15 days in a room at 10–15 °C temperature and 65–75% of relative humidity or 6–7 weeks if pre-tending a more dry product.
Hangikjø, an Iceland-smoked shoulder or leg of lamb, is consumed in the festive meals of Christmas and Easter [20]. The legs and forequarters are salted and dried or immersed in brine for 1–6 days and smoked. Traditionally, they are always smoked with dried sheep manure and birchwood. In Iceland, there are different preferences for the various types of Hangikjöt, and the main trends are actually the use of less salt and less smoke, but dried sheep manure is always needed, because the smoke gives the meat its unique and different flavor [21]. Furthermore, in Iceland, there are still other soured (pickled) and fermented lamb meat products: Blóðmör—a blood sausage, Lifrarpylsa—a liver sausage, Lundabaggi—the rolled lamb flanks, Bringukollar—a lamb brisket, Hrútspungar—the pressed testicles and Sviðasulta—a head cheese from boiled singed sheep heads [20]. Skerpikjøt, wind-dried fermented lamb, as well the Ræstkjøt (semi-dried mutton), are two popular meat products from the Faroe Islands and are especially highly valued [22]. Carcasses are opened up and flattened, cutting through the ribs on one side close to the backbone and hung up along the rivers or brooks on low banks or places with good air circulation [3]. Additionally, being a traditional dish from Faroe Islands, Sperðil is made from the tallow around the rectum of sheep and prepared into a type of primitive sausage that can be used as spread on bread, eaten with fish or added to the traditional unleavened bread [22].
In Asia, mainly in the Himalayan area (Nepal, Northeastern India, Tibet and Bhutan), there are different fermented meat products, using pork, beef, yak and sheep and goat meats [23]. Suka ko Masu is a dried/smoked product usually consumed in Nepal and India. The dried and smoked goat and buffalo meats [24] are sliced in strips of 25–30 cm hanging above the kitchen oven for 7 to 10 days and are consumed mixed with mustard oil, turmeric powder and salt. In the Kumanu Himalayas, the greema/arija is a popular semidry sausage [25]. Some other ethnic meat products, such as kheuri in Sikkim India, are a mixture of yak or beef stuffed and pressed into the sheep stomach and hung in open-air space for one to two months [24,25].
Pastrami is a traditional Romanian dry meat product without heat cure preserved by nitrite or nitrate salts and seasoned with fenugreek and garlic normally made by beef and buffalo water and, in Egypt, also from sheep, goat and camel meats [15].
Over the last few years, in the Mediterranean area of Europe, several goat or sheep processed products have been produced. Mainly in Spain but, also, in other European countries, such as Italy, culled goats meat are, salted, smoked and air-dried following a recipe for cured ham established 2000 years ago as Cecina, after the Latin siccina, which means cured meat, known as Cecina de cabra and Cecina de castron made from goat meat legs [7] and, also, Violin di capra, an Italian traditional goat dry-cured leg [8].
The Kaddid or Gueddid is a traditional salty and dry meat product typically prepared from mutton meat salted and dried outdoors in Maghreb countries (Tunisia, Algeria and Morocco) [5]. The Gueddid can be stored at room temperature for more than a year, and, before consumption, it is desalted after immersion in water, being used in various dishes, such as Aiche, Couscous, Elhessa and Marloga in Algeria [26]. In addition to Gueddid, there are other dry and fermented or not fermented products of North Africa and the Mediterranean of sheep and goat meats, such as Kourdass (a sausage prepared from offal lamb stomach, intestines, liver, lung, spleen and fat), Tidkit (a sun-dried product), Boubnita (a dry lamb fermented sausage), Soudjouk or sucuk (a dry fermented and uncooked sausage of Turkish origin) or Maynama and Merdouma (smoked products) [5]
In Southern Africa, a goat meat drying technique using salting and smoking processes and known as chinkui in Mozambique’s Northern Tete Province is also commonly used [27] as a complementary source of protein in local rural areas of developing countries with large undernourished populations.
The large amounts of dry and semidry sheep and goat products worldwide, with a special focus on the most depressed areas of agriculture and livestock in the world, are evidence of the importance of sheep and goat productions as a way to overcome protein deficits using food preservation ways that respect the environment, producing and consuming meat products with low carbon footprints.

2.2. Sausages

Although not so common in sheep or goat meats, there are some sausages traditionally recognized for their individuality and linked to the consumption history in the regions that produce them. Some of them are fermented sausages fresh or smoked. In Middle Eastern countries, fermented sausages are produced from many different animals instead of pork (beef, buffalo, camel, horse, lamb, goat and mutton) [28,29,30]. Sucuk, also known as sujuk, is a dry-fermented Turkish sausage very common in Southeastern Europe, the Middle East and Middle Asia [30]. Sucuk and other similar sausages are made of beef, goat and sheep meats and tail fat [31], with garlic, salt and other ingredients such as sugar, nitrites and/or nitrates and various seasonings and spices [32]. Sheep tail fat is a constituent of Turkish fermented sausages and kebabs.
Fjellmorr and Lambaspaeipylsa, are dried fermented sausages traditionally produced in Norway and Iceland that contain lamb, as well as beef and pork [33]. Another Norwegian product is Fårepølse, a mutton sausage made with a large meat variety, including goat [34].
Arija and Geema (jamma) are traditional goat meat products from Kumanu Himalaya in Northern India. To prepare Geema, the meat goat is minced and mixed with salt, wild pepper, chili powder, water and fresh blood. This mixture is stuffed into small goat intestines, and then, the sausages are boiled and then are dried for a period of 15–20 days hung above the kitchen oven. The Arija is the same process, but the goat meat is mixed with goat lungs, and the mixture is stuffed into goat large intestines [22,35].
Several studies are investigating the incorporation of sheep or goat meat in sausages. In Vienna sausages, a cured and smoked product [36], a study was conducted to evaluate the consumer acceptability of goat meat frankfurters using three different diets, including canola oil or beef fat [37], using different levels of pork fat in goat mortadella [38] and using sheep tail fat and lean mutton for manufactured dried fermented sausages and studying the effects of the combined starter and species in physicochemical and microbiological properties [39] and studying the suitability of goat meat to the restructuring techniques, assessing the quality during refrigerated storage of the cured goat product [40,41]. In a study, meats of sheep and goats from culled animals were pointed out as valuable alternatives to that meat-producing sausages with different levels of pork fat [9]. The nutritional characteristics and consumer acceptability of different combinations of goat meat with beef have been studied [42], and the technological properties in frankfurter productions were studied using meat from culled animals [13].
Rediscovering processed products based on sheep and goat meats, incorporating functional additives and improving their nutritional and food quality, is increasingly a practice that may add value to meats of low commercial values.

2.3. Cooked or Precooked Prepared Products

The process for producing sliced, easy-to-prepare, prepackaged food products from a goat or a sheep meat is not common. However, we found some examples of processed sheep and goat meat products that can be considered cooked or precooked products. In Northeast Brazil, there is a product called “Buchada de Bode” (buchada coming from the Portuguese word bucho, the animal’s stomach, and bode is the Portuguese designation of the male goat) made with reticulum stuffed with entrails or organs, such as blood, intestines, liver and lungs, seasoned and then sewn up and cooked.
In Turkey, the traditional meat used to make kebabs is lamb. There are several types of kebabs, but the world-famous one is the Döner, made conventionally from lamb, which is slowly roasted on a vertical spit and then thinly sliced off. In local markets, it is very popular to order precooked kebabs of minced lamb mixed with tail fat and vegetables such as eggplants, tomatoes, peppers and onions, ready to roast at home. In India and Pakistan, there are many varieties of kebabs commonly prepared with lamb. In reality, the consumption of kebabs has now extended to the whole world but occupies a prominent place in the Mediterranean area.
Lamb and goat are the most popular meats used in Arab countries, where there are some popular street-prepared dishes such as Shawarma (a food made with marinated cuts of meat skewered on a vertical rotary roasting fork (spit) and baked by radiant heat), Kibbeh or kebbah (a traditional food consisting of a mixture of ground bulgur and minced lamb or beef meat, which are made as a dough) or the Kofta (another dish made with minced meat) [43].
In the Mediterranean countries of North Africa, there are several cooked and crystallized products from sheep and goats seasoned and stuffed with local species, such as Laknaf, tha Cachir and Khliaa ezir in Algeria; Osbana in Algeria Tunisia, Libya and Morocco; kabiba in Egypt; Mcharmia in Algeria and Morocco; Boubnit or Membar in Algeria and Egypt; Mkila, Tehal and Tangia in Morocco; Bekbouka in Morocco, Algeria and Tunisia or Mrouzia in Morocco and Tunisia [5].
In Mexico, barbacoa is a very traditional dish prepared with lamb or goat, which is slow-cooked in an underground oven lined with hot coals and covered with agave leaves until very tender and juicy. Today there are some food industries that commercialize precooked barbacoa ready to eat at home and that can be exported mainly to countries with Mexicans immigrants.
In Spain, one of the most famous dishes is “Lechazo de castilla”, a milk-fed lamb slow-roasted in firewood ovens. Corresponding to modern lifestyles, there are also food industries that offer a delicatessen product, such as Lechazo, in a precooked and vacuum-packed form, ready to serve on the table in 30 min.
Chanfana is an old, traditional Portuguese dish cooked in black clay pots made from local clay inside a wood oven slowly cooking old goat or sheep meats in red wine with some herbs and spices, making the meat tender and more palatable. The resulting dish turned out to be so tasty that it is now a regional delicacy in Portugal.
In the last years, several studies using sheep and goat meats with cooked or precooked products and some products ready to cook have been developed as patties [44,45,46,47], nuggets [48,49,50,51,52,53,54], hamburgers [55,56] or pâté [11,57,58,59] and others [60,61,62,63]. In the Indian subcontinent (India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Nepal and Sri Lanka), there are several traditional meat products and recipes using sheep and goat meats, such as Rogan Josh, a lamb meat marinated with Kashmiri chilies, Aab Gosht, a lamb curry cooked in milk, Rista and Goshtaba, a minced lamb meat cooked in mutton stock gravy, Haleem prepared from goat or buffalo meats or Kolhapuri mutton with different curries [64].
Unfortunately, many of these products are unknown to the general public, but they are the basis of foods for populations in developing countries, with peculiar sensory qualities and, at the same time, with high nutritional values and nutraceutical characteristics. Most of them deserve to be recognized as cultural heritages of the gastronomy of these countries and with world recognition with support and protection.

3. Meat Processed Product Qualities

The set of properties normally used to characterize the quality of a meat product are associated with physical and chemical attributes, with our sensory feelings and related with the perception that it is safe to eat. The quality of the physicochemical, microbiological and safety and sensory properties of sheep and goat processed products will be covered in the following sections.

3.1. Physicochemical Quality

The physicochemical characteristics of many of the products described above have been studied in the last 10 to 15 years. Table 1 summarizes the main attributes measured and effects studied on different processed goat and sheep products. Most of these products show high protein contents, balanced fat and fatty acid profiles, low cholesterol contents and resistances to lipid oxidation. The color parameters in the different meat-processing technologies show some pigment oxidations as a result of the preservation methods. The color parameters H* and C* were affected by salting and air drying, and the meat-based products became darker. Globally, the process methods improve the preservation quality once the water activity (aw) is reduced.
Some of the studies in some of these new processed products showed interesting results to improve the physicochemical quality. Some studies pointed out the importance of using meats from culled sheep and goats to obtain processed products, with added values to animals with very low commercial values and acceptability by consumers [9,10,11,12,13].
One of the disadvantages of processed meat products is the oxidation of the lipid fraction and proteins. Several studies have been carried out to reduce this effect. Using fermented goat sausages, it was observed that preparations containing 0.05% rosemary showed better oxidative stability with lower values of thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) than those with only 0.025% rosemary [74]. In cooked meat patties, the antioxidant potentials of kinnow rind, pomegranate rind and seed powders extracts were evaluated [44]. In addition, the antioxidant potential of broccoli extract in goat meat nuggets was evaluated and validated [47]. In cured restructured goat meat product, it was observed that some natural antioxidants have relevant antioxidant activities. For example, sodium ascorbate and alphatocopherol acetate improved the color and lipid stability by reducing the lipid oxidation and free fatty acids values [39]. Additionally, the use of the antioxidant activity of hop powder and a hop infusion in lamb patties was referred [45]; the inclusion of oregano extract in the manufacture of cooked sausages showed lower lipid and protein autoxidation [73], as well as the attributed antioxidant activities of chrysanthemum morifolium flower to goat meat patties [46].
Besides the more traditional products linked to the culture of the people and the ancestor methods of preserving meat, in general, the results indicate that the meats of sheep and goats show aptitudes to processing. The sheep and goat meats can be processed in cured, dry and fermented products or to incorporate meat mixtures in patties, pâtés, sausages and hamburgers as a way to add value to meats from animals that do not meet the quality specifications of products, such as PDO and PGI brands.

3.2. Microbiological Quality and Safety

Food safety is one of the main concerns to the food industry, government food safety regulatory authorities and consumers due to the significant increase in foodborne diseases and outbreaks reported worldwide in the 20th and 21st centuries. Microbiological, chemical and physical risks are the main group of risks to food safety in the food industry. The microbiological hazards involve foodborne pathogens; chemical hazards are related to antibiotic, pesticide and herbicide issues and physical hazards are associated with strange objects in foods that can cause injury or illness to consumers. This subsection will focus on microbiological topics related to food safety.
Related to food safety, fermentation plays the following roles in food processing [75]: (1) food preservation by inhibitory metabolites, such as organic acid; formation (lactic acid, acetic acid, formic acid and propionic acid); ethanol; bacteriocins, etc., often combined with a aw decrease (by ripening or salting) [76,77]; (2) food safety improvement through pathogen inhibitions [78,79] or toxic compound removals [80]. Recent studies on fermented meat products confirmed the existence of a great fount of microorganisms with probiotic characteristics in those products [81], guaranteeing hygienic and safety quality [82]. Studying ripening and fermentation effects on the meat microflora of diverse species (cattle, horse, wild boar, goat and deer), an inhibitory effect of aw, pH and lactic acid bacteria (LAB) was found on the pathogenic bacteria during the fermentation process [83]. In the raw materials, the same authors working with uncooked meat products observed the presence of typical flora such as Staphylococcus aureus and coliforms in all samples, and none had Salmonella or L. monocytogenes. However, at the end of the fermentation process, an increase in LAB was observed. This increase has an opposed action on the contaminating flora.
Salting has been used as a food preservative for thousands of years. The pH and aw numbers revealed that processing could have an essential role to control the spoiling of meat, promoting the safety and shelf-life stability of the products exposed to microbiological growths. For Norwegian Fenalår, 5–10% NaCl was registered [84]. Skerpikjøt with a aw value 0.90 had no salt addition [84], which was directly related to botulism incidences [85]. The final content of 4.5% NaCl (or lower) in sheep ham was challenging, considering unwanted bacterial growths, but preferable, considering health recommendations [85]. The salt content depends on production practices; for Spanish lamb ham, it was referenced 7.96% NaCl and a aw of 0.88 [45], for dry-cured goat legs, values of 3.8% NaCl and a aw of 0.83 and 4.7% and 0.87 for sheep after salting and air-drying processes were found [10]. Nitrite salt was used in pâté production [59], and processed goat hams were dry-salted with nitrite salt (sodium chloride and sodium nitrite) [65]. Nitrites may be associated with cancer and other health issues [86]. However, the nitrite contents in the pâtés and cured hams were lower than the maximum recommended by the FAO [87], and the European Union allowed their inclusion as food additives [88]. Microbiological safety implications in salt-reduced Fenalår was shown to be important [89], especially when no nitrite was added, because of the considerable increase of the growth potential of L. monocytogenes.
A study [40] on the effects of natural antioxidants on the quality of cured, restructured goat meat products during refrigeration storage pointed out the effects of sodium ascorbate and alpha tocopherol acetate on microbiological properties. No significant effects were found in the microbial counts, and coliforms and Staphylococcus aureus were found occasionally during the refrigerated storage period. Microbial counts were reduced by the addition of extracts obtained from grape and olive pomaces [90], showing the possibility of using them as a sodium ascorbate replacer in lamb meat products.
The effects of avishane shirazi (Zataria multiflora) and clove (Syzygium aromaticum) essential oils on microbiological properties of ground sheep meat during refrigerated storage were evaluated [91]. Total mesophilic counts (TMC), LAB, coliforms, yeasts and Listeria counts were performed. The most significant effect of avshane essential oil (AEO) was observed in LAB growth-controlling (1.2–3.4 log cycles) and coliforms (1–2.5 log cycles). The inhibitory effects of oils on the TMC and yeast counts were minor, while both oils had strong and comparable preventing effects on the Listeria populations.
Mycobiota and mycotoxins in Portuguese pork, goat and sheep dry-cured hams were studied [12]. The contamination of Portuguese-ripened meat products with ochratoxin A (OTA) and aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) was examined, and the contamination potential cause that fungi established. No OTA was detected in the goat and sheep samples. So, OTA contamination does not appear to be a hazard in small meat joints during short ripening periods in products such as goat or sheep legs.

3.3. Sensory Quality

The nutritional and physicochemical characteristics play an essential role in food production. However, their organoleptic characteristics and acceptance by consumers will assure their marketplace. The sensory analysis allowed us to define and predict food products’ acceptances by consumers. A review about sheep and goat-processed products was conducted [18], referring to several studies on the sensory quality of new sheep and goat products. Some different treatments or processes were tested and compared. Differences between sheep and goat products [10,92,93,94] were found. Globally, sheep products were juicier, and goat products were harder, had more intense flavor and more acid and rancid tastes. More curing time led to higher brightness. Variations in the processing methods in distinct locations produced differences in sheep ham sensory characteristics [85]. The effect of tumbling after dry-salting and the processing time on the sensory characteristics of dry-cured lamb legs [45] was not significant between no, short and long tumbling, except for pastiness, which should not be considered an eating quality defect, since it was not that significant. Storage time and packaging can influence the quality of lamb pâté prepared with “variety meat” [59], and a decrease in sensory texture and overall impression could reduce the shelf life.
Table 2 summarizes the primary sensory studies performed by trained panelists on new meat processed products incorporating sheep and goat meats.
Artificial food additives (e.g., antioxidants) used to modify sensory qualities can have health implications [97,98,99,100,101,102] concerning both consumers and food manufacturers. Consequently, a revived appeal about natural products and its research has grown [103,104,105]. The effects on sensory aspects were investigated. Some of the impacts were color and odor preservation, the inhibition of discoloration and off-odor formation; a decrease in oxidation odor and flavor and changes in the overall acceptability. It has been shown [96] that hops could be applied to make lean lamb patties to minimize the deterioration of flavor by oxidation. In addition, a higher flavor intensity was observed when hop was used as a powder compared to an infusion or was not used. The use of three distinct concentrations of Origanum vulgare extract, with potential antioxidant properties, in sheep sausages [73] showed no significant differences in smell and taste between the various levels of oregano and sodium erythorbate. However, sodium erythrobate and higher levels of oregano got a more intense red color than the control, possibly decreasing the acceptability by consumers.
The use of paprika influenced the sensory characteristics as a persistence and intensity of flavor, spiciness and off-odor in ewe and goat meat sausages [92]. Exploring the possibility of using goat meat in traditional Sucuk production, no significant differences in cut appearance, color and odor between goat and beef Sucuk were observed [95]. To soothe the goat flavor, making a more acceptable product to consumers, the authors suggested replacing goat fat with beef fat. The sensory quality of culled goat meat frankfurters [13] showed very close grades between the goat and beef (CON) frankfurters, and no significant differences were noticed for odor, taste, hardness and juiciness. Color was the single attribute significantly different in frankfurter formulations. Goat frankfurters were lighter than beef; the more goat content, the lights were the sausages.
Taste panels were used to objectively evaluate the food. Human beings act as machines, but they are not machines, and sensory evaluations always have some subjective issues. Much more variability is expected to be found in sensory than physical-chemical analyses; however, with the use of standards and references, and with the appropriate statistical analysis, it is possible to reduce the variability and have a reliable sensory characterization of the food.
Nevertheless, sensory characteristics are not the only essential point of a food product, and consumers have the final word. So, consumer panels play an important role informing about their likes, dislikes and preferences. Following, a set of studies are presented informing about acceptability and preferences considering sheep and goat meat products.
A sensory acceptance and purchase intentions by 80 potential consumers of goat mortadella with distinct fat and goat meat percentages study [38] revealed the possibility of making an agreeable value-added goat meat product. Consumers preferred the goat mortadella with less fat and more goat meat in all the studied sensory aspects, except texture.
Sheep meat sausages were referred to as an unexploited market opportunity when the sensory characteristics of fermented, cured sausages manufactured with beef, pork and sheep meat were evaluated [106]. The reason was that there were no commercial examples, and no significant differences in texture (hardness, springiness, adhesiveness and cohesiveness) after anaerobic fermentation were observed among the species. Additionally, just small differences were noticed in the colors. Nevertheless, even if not tested, it is alleged that consumers would be capable of finding a texture difference due to distinct fat-melting points, the highest for sheep meat. Additionally, a sensory analysis was completed to identify the possibility of the coating or even removing the peculiar sheep meat flavor to please consumers unfamiliar with this product [106]. An extreme characteristic was simulated by producing a sheep meat and beef-blended sausage: spicing it or not. The authors also variably added sodium nitrite and a garlic/rosemary flavor. A spiked sheep meat flavor produced a general significant decline in mean liking. Still, an increase was detected when garlic/rosemary was included. Nitrite did not affect the liking. Conclusions hinted at the option of hiding sheep meat flavor to attract unused consumers. Commercial exemplars might be prepared for these consumers, but the required “mutton” name would adversely affect expectations in some markets.
Table 3 summarizes the sensory studies with nontrained consumers on brand new manufactured products using sheep and goat meats.
The improvement in the uniformity of flavor, appearance and texture of fermented products by the appropriate physiologically active starter culture was already mentioned in 1970 [110]. A sensory analysis of fermented mutton sausage using different starter cultures [111] exhibited satisfactory records in refrigerated 60 days of storage. Additionally, distinct starter cultures [112] generated median values in a nine-point scale for goat meat-fermented sausages’ global acceptability, and no significant differences for all treatments were observed. Judges used some sporadic remarks such as “rancid” and “soap” possibly linked to the product’s fat oxidation or even to the lipolytic action of starter culture microorganisms. Lactic starter cultures were used to study the effects of fermentation and drying temperatures on the sensory attributes of goat meat dry sausages [113]. Fermented sausages at a temperature of 30 °C, and dried at 10 °C, presented higher satisfactoriness concerning taste, flavor, texture and overall acceptability in a five-point hedonic scale.
Consumers generally appreciated fresh sausages made using sheep and goat meats [92], showing no evident predilections for sheep, goat or seasoning. The hedonic test completed to investigate the use of hop as an antioxidant in lean lamb patties [96] showed that the control and infused patty flavors had significantly higher scores than powdered patty flavors. Several elements of hop essential oil and resin are the cause of its strong odor and bitter taste [114,115]. A remarkable effect of two essential oils on the color and odor attributes of ground sheep meat [91] was registered. The overall acceptability was not affected.
Examining distinct fat content additions, which can be challenging, on the sensory acceptability of a goat meat-fermented sausage [112], the assessed characteristics were not significantly different. Additionally, no significant differences were found in consumers’ preferences concerning meat [58] substitutions (pork by sheep) on cooked ham-type pâté or fat [94]. However, significant differences were mentioned [9] in the overall acceptability of sheep and goat sausages with distinct fat amounts. Consumers preferred higher fat content goat sausages. Dry-cured sheep meat acceptability by native and immigrant consumers in Spain was investigated in a cross-cultural study [108]. Independently from their cultural background, consumers appreciated “Cecina” from culled ewes. Generally, the overall acceptability was not modified by the animals’ finishing levels, even though leaner animals were preferred by some consumer clusters.
A positive consumer attitude towards salt reduction and the use of natural antioxidants [109] emphasizes the need to develop improved meat-processing techniques created from scientific information with potential benefits for the meat industry and public health. Additionally, the knowledge about consumers’ perceptions for healthier products requires the inclusion of consumption contexts. The way a product is consumed is important, as it can lead to different results [109].
Four culled goat meat percentages (G25, G50, G75 and G100) were used to produce frankfurters and compared to beef (CON) [13]. Consumers observed an increasing lightness and decreased redness in frankfurters with increasing goat meat contents, but it was not negatively perceived. More than 80% of consumers identified goat frankfurters and the CON with a pleasant color in a Check-all-that-apply (CATA) analysis. Similar results were pointed out for pleasant appearance, pleasant odor, tasty, soft and juicy. Additionally, no atypical taste and odor were marked. Panelists preferred G50, while consumers preferred G75.
Globally, sheep and goat meat products reported in the previous studies were well-accepted and proven to be a way of giving added value to less-appreciated products. The use of additives can mask some unpleasant characteristics, such as odor, for example. However, there are always consumers that appreciate that peculiar odor, and the complete removal of the innate sheep and goat characteristics can be a negative point in food processing, because they lose their identity.

4. Conclusions

Several sheep and goat processed meat products confirm the importance of these species in consumer cultures around the world, and most of them have a great demand and are very well-appreciated in many countries and regions, such as North Europe, the Mediterranean area, Middle East, North Africa or Central Asia. In countries without a tradition of goat or sheep consumption, they are frequent in delicatessen stores or ethnic markets. Processed products such as sausages, pâtés or frankfurters, blending different animal or vegetal fat sources, can give additional value to the less-appreciated goat meat from culled animals. Using some natural antioxidant byproducts in meat processing, sheep and goat products can be used as functional health-promoting foods and can also improve the shelf life, product color and reduce the lipid and protein autoxidation. The rediscovery of a new generation of goat and sheep meat products as functional foods and eating quality is an exciting food research field, answering to the constant innovation requirements by the meat industry. Several possibilities exist to process sheep and goat meats to make them more diversified and appealing to the market.
The use of starter cultures, spices, essential oils and other additives may provide nutritional and sensory advantages of dry fermented sheep and goat sausages. Cured and smoked goat and sheep legs have great commercial potential, with a highly acceptable consumer commodity.
Traditional goat and sheep meat products are part of the cultures of their countries, and many of them must be better studied and characterized as a way to preserve and protect them in terms of certifications of their origins. The deep knowledge of the formulations, the optimization of processing methods, improving advancing packaging and preservation procedures and the organization of the distribution and marketing chains are actions that should be prioritized. Everything related to food safety and the increasing importance of traceability is detailed information to consumers and will continue to be a matter of constant concern and should be considered in the future.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.T., S.S. and S.R.; writing—original draft preparation, A.T. and S.R. and writing—review and editing, C.G., A.T., S.R.S. and S.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Authors are grateful to the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal) for financial support by national funds FCT/MCTES to CIMO (UIDB/00690/2020). Authors are also thankful to the project UIDB/CVT/00772/2020 funded by the Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT, Portugal).

Acknowledgments

Authors are grateful to the Laboratory of Carcass and Meat Quality of Agriculture School of Polytechnic Institute of Bragança “Cantinho do Alfredo”. The authors A. Teixeira and S. Rodrigues are members of the Healthy Meat network, funded by CYTED (ref. 119RT0568).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. FAOSTAT. Available online: http://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/FO (accessed on 4 April 2019).
  2. Teixeira, A.; Rodrigues, S. Meat quality, brands and consumer trends. In More than Beef, Pork and Chicken—The Production, Processing, and Quality Traits of Other Sources of Meat for Human Diet; Lorenzo, J., Munekata, P., Barba, F., Toldrá, F., Eds.; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 21–29. [Google Scholar]
  3. Håseth, T.T.; Thorkelsson, G.; Sidhu, M. North European Products. In Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry; Toldrá, J., Ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2015; pp. 407–413. [Google Scholar]
  4. Kilic, B. Current trends in traditional Turkish meat products and cuisine. LWT 2009, 42, 1581–1589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gagaoua, M.; Boudechicha, H.-R. Ethnic meat products of the North African and Mediterranean countries: An overview. J. Ethn. Foods 2018, 5, 83–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Teixeira, A.; Rodrigues, S.; Dias, T.; Estevinho, L. Sheep and goat fermented meat products-health aspects. In Fermented Meat Products: Health Aspects; Zdolec, N., Ed.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2017; pp. 78–94. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hierro, E.; de la Hoz, L.; Ordóñez, J.A. Headspace volatile compounds from salted and occasionally smoked dried meats (cecinas) as affected by animal species. Food Chem. 2004, 85, 649–657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fratianni, F.; Sada, A.; Orlando, P.; Nazzaro, F. Micro-electrophoretic study of sarcoplasmatic fraction in the dry-cured goat raw ham. Open Food Sci. J. 2008, 2, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Leite, A.; Rodrigues, S.; Pereira, E.; Paulos, K.; Oliveira, A.F.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Teixeira, A. Physicochemical properties, fatty acid profile and sensory characteristics of sheep and goat meat sausages manufactured with different pork fat levels. Meat Sci. 2015, 105, 114–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Teixeira, A.; Fernandes, A.; Pereira, E.; Manuel, A.; Rodrigues, S. Effect of salting and ripening on the physicochemical and sensory quality of goat and sheep cured legs. Meat Sci. 2017, 134, 163–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Teixeira, A.; Almeida, S.; Pereira, E.; Mangachaia, F.; Rodrigues, S. Physicochemical characteristics of sheep and goat pâtés. differences between fat sources and proportions. Heliyon 2019, 5, e02119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Morales, P.; Silva, D.; Costa, P.; Abrunhosa, L.; Venâncio, A.; Teixeira, A. Mycobiota and mycotoxins in Portuguese pork, goat and sheep dry-cured hams. Mycotoxin Res. 2019, 35, 405–412. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Stajić, S.; Pisinov, B.; Tomasevic, I.; Djekic, I.; Čolović, D.; Ivanović, S.; Živković, D. Use of culled goat meat in frankfurter production—effect on sensory quality and technological properties. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 55, 1032–1045. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Roşca, D.; Roşca, A. The influence of cyclic vacuuming and pressuring process on tenderizing sheep pastrami. Sci. Res. Educ. Air Force AFASES 2015, 2, 591–596. [Google Scholar]
  15. Abd-ElGhany, S.M.; El-Makhzangy, A.M.; El-Shawaf, A.-G.M.; El-Mougy, R.M.; Sallam, K.I. Improving safety and quality of Egyptian pastrami through alteration of its microbial community. LWT 2020, 118, 108872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ponnampalam, E.N.; Holman, B.W.B.; Scollan, N.D. Sheep: Meat. In Encyclopedia of Food and Health; Caballero, B., Finglas, P., Toldra, F., Eds.; Elsevier Inc.: Burlington, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 750–757. [Google Scholar]
  17. Coleman, G. Consumer and societal expectations for sheep products. In Advances in Sheep Welfare; Elsevier BV: Duxford, UK, 2017; pp. 37–51. [Google Scholar]
  18. Teixeira, A.; Silva, S.; Rodrigues, S. Advances in Sheep and Goat Meat Products Research. Adv. Food Nutr. Res. 2019, 87, 305–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Fadda, S.; Vignolo, G. Central and South American Products. In Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2014; pp. 355–360. [Google Scholar]
  20. Steingrímsdóttir, L.; Thorkelsson, G.; Eythórsdóttir, E. Food, Nutrition, and Health in Iceland. In Nutritional and Health Aspects of Food in Nordic Countries; Elsevier BV: Duxford, UK, 2018; pp. 145–177. [Google Scholar]
  21. Thorkelsson, G. Development of Dried and Cured Lamb Meat in Norway, Faroe Islands and Iceland. Available online: http://norafo.typo3cms.dk/fileadmin/user_upload/files/13/20121218145346709.pdf (accessed on 15 April 2020).
  22. Svanberg, I. Ræstur fiskur: Air-dried fermented fish the Faroese way. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2015, 11, 76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  23. Tamang, J.P. Himalayan Fermented Foods: Microbiology, Nutrition and Ethnic Values; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2010; p. 216. [Google Scholar]
  24. Rai, A.K.; Palni, U.; Tamang, J.P. Traditional knowledge of the ethnic Himalayan people on production of indigenous meat products. Indian J. Tradit. Knowl. 2009, 8, 586–591. [Google Scholar]
  25. Rai, A.K.; Tamang, J.P.; Palni, U. Microbiological studies of ethnic meat products of the Eastern Himalayas. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 560–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Benlacheheb, R.; Becila, S.; Sentandreu, M.A.; Hafid, K.; Boudechicha, H.R.; Boudjellal, A. El Gueddid, a traditional Algerian dried salted meat: Physicochemical, microbiological characteristics and proteolysis intensity during its manufacturing process and ripening. Food Sci. Technol. Int. 2019, 25, 347–355. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. del Valle, M.M.; Ibarra, J.T.; Hörmann, P.A.; Hernández, R.; Riveros, F.; Luis, J. Local Knowledge for Addressing Food Insecurity: The Use of a Goat Meat Drying Technique in a Rural Famine Context in Southern Africa. Animals 2019, 9, 808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Toldrá, F.; Nip, W.-K.; Hui, Y.H. Dry-Fermented Sausages: An Overview. In Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2008; pp. 321–325. [Google Scholar]
  29. Zeng, W.; Wen, W.; Deng, Y.; Tian, Y.; Sun, H.; Sun, Q. Chinese ethnic meat products: Continuity and development. Meat Sci. 2016, 120, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Stajić, S.; Perunović, M.; Stanišić, N.; Žujović, M.; Živković, D. Sucuk (Turkish-Style Dry-Fermented Sausage) Quality as an Influence of Recipe Formulation and Inoculation of Starter Cultures. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2012, 37, 870–880. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Saricoban, C.; Karakaya, M.; Caner, C. Properties of Turkish-Style Sucuk Made with Different Combinations of Beef and Hen Meat. J. Muscle Foods 2006, 17, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ayla Soyer, A.; Ertas, A.H.; Üzümcüoğlu, Ü. Effect of processing conditions on the quality of naturally fermented Turkish sausages (sucuks). Meat Sci. 2005, 69, 135–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Helgesen, H.; Solheim, R.; Naes, T. Consumer purchase probability of dry fermented lamb sausages. Food Qual. Prefer. 1998, 9, 295–301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Holck, A.; Heir, E.; Johannessen, T.C.; Axelsson, L. Northern European Products. In Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry; Wiley: Chichester, UK, 2014; pp. 313–320. [Google Scholar]
  35. Rai, A.K.; Chakravorty, R.; Paul, J. Detection of Giardia, Entamoeba, and Cryptosporidium in unprocessed food items from northern India. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 24, 2879–2887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Breukink, H.R.; Casey, N.H. Assessing the acceptability of processed goat meat. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci. 1989, 19, 76–80. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bratcher, C.L.; Dawkins, N.L.; Solaiman, S.; Kerth, C.R.; Bartlett, J.R. Texture and acceptability of goat meat frankfurters processed with 3 different sources of fat. J. Anim. Sci. 2011, 89, 1429–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Guerra, I.C.D.; Félex, S.S.S.; Meireles, B.R.L.M.; Dalmás, P.S.; Moreira, R.T.; Honório, V.G.; Morgano, M.A.; Milani, R.F.; Benevides, S.D.; Queiroga, R.C.R.E.; et al. Evaluation of goat mortadella prepared with different levels of fat and goat meat from discarded animals. Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 98, 59–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Zhao, L.; Jin, Y.; Ma, C.; Song, H.; Li, H.; Wang, Z.; Xiao, S. Physico-chemical characteristics and free fatty acid composition of dry fermented mutton sausages as affected by the use of various combinations of starter cultures and spices. Meat Sci. 2011, 88, 761–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Gadekar, Y.; Sharma, B.; Shinde, A.; Verma, A.; Mendiratta, S. Effect of natural antioxidants on the quality of cured, restructured goat meat product during refrigerated storage (4 ± 1 °C). Small Rumin. Res. 2014, 119, 72–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gadekar, Y.P.; Sharma, B.D.; Shinde, A.K.; Thomas, R.; Mendiratta, S.K. Usage of sodium ascorbate and alpha tocopherol acetate. Fleischwirtsch. Int. 2014, 29, 52–57. [Google Scholar]
  42. Malekian, F.; Khachaturyan, M.; Gebrelul, S.; Henson, J. Nutritional characteristics and consumer acceptability of sausages with different combinations of goat and beef meats. Funct. Foods Heal. Dis. 2016, 6, 42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Al-Khusaibi, M. Arab traditional foods: Preparation, processing and nutrition. In Traditional Foods; Al-Khusaibi, M., Al-Habsi, N., Shafiur Rahman, M., Eds.; Food Engineering Series; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2019; pp. 9–35. [Google Scholar]
  44. Das, A.K.; Anjaneyulu, A.; Thomas, R.; Kondaiah, N. Effect of different fats on the quality of goat meat patties incorporated with full-fat soy paste. J. Muscle Foods 2009, 20, 37–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Devatkal, S.K.; Narsaiah, K.; Borah, A. Anti-oxidant effect of extracts of kinnow rind, pomegranate rind and seed powders in cooked goat meat patties. Meat Sci. 2010, 85, 155–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Villalobos-Delgado, L.H.; Caro, I.; Blanco, C.; Morán, L.; Prieto, N.; Bodas, R.; Giráldez, F.J.; Mateo, J.; Giráldez, J. Quality characteristics of a dry-cured lamb leg as affected by tumbling after dry-salting and processing time. Meat Sci. 2014, 97, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Khan, I.A.; Xu, W.; Wang, D.; Yun, A.; Khan, A.; Zongshuai, Z.; Ijaz, M.U.; Yiqun, C.; Hussain, M.; Huang, M. Antioxidant potential of chrysanthemum morifolium flower extract on lipid and protein oxidation in goat meat patties during refrigerated storage. J. Food Sci. 2020, 85, 618–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Banerjee, R.; Verma, A.K.; Das, A.K.; Rajkumar, V.; Shewalkar, A.; Narkhede, H. Antioxidant effects of broccoli powder extract in goat meat nuggets. Meat Sci. 2012, 91, 179–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Das, A.K.; Rajkumar, V.; Verma, A.K. Bael Pulp Residue as a New Source of Antioxidant Dietary Fiber in Goat Meat Nuggets. J. Food Process. Preserv. 2014, 39, 1626–1635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  50. Gadekar, Y.P.; Shinde, A.K.; Karim, S.A. Effect of inulin on physico-chemical, textural and sensory characteristics of reduced fat lamb nuggets. Rumin. Sci. 2016, 6, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gadekar, Y.P.; Shinde, A.K.; Bhatt, R.S. Quality of low fat and prebiotic-Enriched lamb nuggets during refrigerated storage. Indian J. Small Rumin. 2018, 24, 139–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Jagtap, N.S.; Wagh, R.V.; Chatli, M.K.; Malav, O.P.; Kumar, P.; Mehta, N. Functional goat meat nuggets fortified with novel bioactive Carica papaya L. and Origanum vulgare extracts and storage stability thereof. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 50, 402–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Verma, A.K.; Rajkumar, V.; Kumar, M.S.; Jayant, S.K. Antioxidative effect of drumstick (Moringa oleifera L.) flower on the quality and stability of goat meat nuggets. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 50, 84–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Banerjee, D.K.; Das, A.K.; Banerjee, R.; Pateiro, M.; Nanda, P.K.; Gadekar, Y.P.; Biswas, S.; McClements, D.J.; Lorenzo, J.M. Application of Enoki Mushroom (Flammulina Velutipes) Stem Wastes as Functional Ingredients in Goat Meat Nuggets. Foods 2020, 9, 432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Linares, M.; Cózar, A.; Garrido, M.D.; Vergara, H. Chemical and sensory quality of lamb meat burgers from Manchego Spanish breed. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 63, 843–852. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Monego, M.A.; Kipper, D.K.; De Pellegrini, L.G.; De Pellegrini, L.G.; Roman, S.S.; Kubota, E.H.; Prestes, R.C.; Mello, R.D.O. Physicochemical, technological and sensory properties of hamburger made with meat from lambs fed on whole cottonseed. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 55, 2230–2239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Dalmás, P.; Bezerra, T.; Morgano, M.; Milani, R.F.; Madruga, M.S. Development of goat pâté prepared with ‘variety meat’. Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 98, 46–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Dutra, M.P.; Palhares, P.C.; Silva, J.R.; Ezequiel, I.P.; Perez, J.R.; Ramos, E.M. Technological and quality characteristics of cooked ham-type pâté elaborated with sheep meat. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 115, 56–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Amaral, D.; Silva, F.; Bezerra, T.; Arcanjo, N.; Guerra, I.; Dalmás, P.; Madruga, M. Effect of storage time and packaging on the quality of lamb pâté prepared with ‘variety meat’. Food Packag. Shelf Life 2015, 3, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Monego, M.A.; Pellegrini, L.G.; Roman, S.S.; Kubota, E.H.; Prestes, R.C.; Mello, R.O. Is it possible to produce meatballs made with lamb from animals fed on whole cottonseed without altering the sensory characteristics? Int. Food Res. J. 2018, 25, 2486–2496. [Google Scholar]
  61. Guedes-Oliveira, J.M.; Da Costa-Lima, B.R.C.; Cunha, L.; Salim, A.P.A.A.; Baltar, J.D.; Fortunato, A.R.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Impact of Myrciaria Dubia Peel and Seed Extracts on Oxidation Process and Colour Stability of Ground Lamb. CyTA J. Food 2018, 16, 931–937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Ninh, N.P. Various factors affecting to the dried goat meat production. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Re. 2017, 12, 15316–15318. [Google Scholar]
  63. Kazhybayeva, G.; Agibayeva, A.; Kuderinova, N.; Harlap, S.; Fedoseeva, N.; Usov, V.; Zhumanova, G.; Bakirova, L. Development of technology and assessment of nutritional value of a delicacy goat meat product. Int. J. Innov. Technol. Explor. Eng. IJITEE 2019, 8, 2278–3075. [Google Scholar]
  64. Bhandare, S.G. Ethnic meat products. In Encyclopedia of Meat Sciences: India and Pakistan, 2nd ed.; Devine, C., Dikeman, M., Eds.; Elsevier: London, UK, 2014; Volume 1, pp. 538–542. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Ivanovic, S.; Nesic, K.; Pisinov, B.; Pavlovic, I. The impact of diet on the quality of fresh meat and smoked ham in goat. Small Rumin. Res. 2016, 138, 53–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Teixeira, A.; Pereira, E.; Rodrigues, E.; Rodrigues, S. Goat meat quality. Effects of salting, air-drying and ageing processes. Small Rumin. Res. 2011, 98, 55–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Cherroud, S.; Cachaldora, A.; Fonseca, S.; Laglaoui, A.; Carballo, J.; Franco, I. Microbiological and physicochemical characterization of dry-cured Halal goat meat. Effect of salting time and addition of olive oil and paprika covering. Meat Sci. 2014, 98, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  68. Oliveira, A.F.; Rodrigues, S.; Leite, A.; Paulos, K.; Pereira, E.; Teixeira, A. Short Communication: Quality of ewe and goat meat cured productmantas. An approach to provide value added to culled animals. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2014, 94, 459–462. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Ortega-Bonilla, R.A.; Chito, D.; Teixeira, A. Comparative evaluation of physical parameters of salted goat and sheep meat blankets “mantas” from Northeastern Portugal. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2016, 10, 670–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Silva, F.A.; Amaral, D.; Guerra, I.; Dalmás, P.; Arcanjo, N.; Bezerra, T.; Filho, E.B.; Moreira, R.; Madruga, M. The chemical and sensory qualities of smoked blood sausage made with the edible by-products of goat slaughter. Meat Sci. 2013, 94, 34–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. De Queiroz, A.L.M.; Brasil, L.M.D.S.; Da Silva, J.; Magnani, M.; De Souza, E.L.; Madruga, M.S. Microbiological and nutritional quality of “buchada caprina”, an edible goat meat by-product. Small Rumin. Res. 2013, 115, 62–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Laskar, S.K.; Jebin, N.; Nath, D.R.; Hazarika, M. Studies on composition and sensory quality of fat reduced chevon salamis incorporated with glutinous rice flour. Asian J. Dairy Food Res. 2013, 32, 149–151. [Google Scholar]
  73. Fernandes, R.P.P.; Trindade, M.A.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Melo, M.P. Assessment of the stability of sheep sausages with the addition of different concentrations of Origanum vulgare extract during storage. Meat Sci. 2018, 137, 244–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Nassu, R.T.; Gonçalves, L.A.G.; Da Silva, M.A.A.P.; Beserra, F.J. Oxidative stability of fermented goat meat sausage with different levels of natural antioxidant. Meat Sci. 2003, 63, 43–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Bourdichon, F.; Casaregola, S.; Farrokh, C.; Frisvad, J.C.; Gerds, M.L.; Hammes, W.P.; Harnett, J.; Huys, G.R.; Laulund, S.; Ouwehand, A.C.; et al. Food fermentations: Microorganisms with technological beneficial use. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2012, 154, 87–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Gaggìa, F.; Di Gioia, D.; Baffoni, L.; Biavati, B. The role of protective and probiotic cultures in food and feed and their impact in food safety. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2011, 22, S58–S66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Ross, R.P.; Morgan, S.; Hill, C. Preservation and fermentation: Past, present and future. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 79, 3–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Adams, M.; Mitchell, R. Fermentation and pathogen control: A risk assessment approach. Int. J. Food Microbiol. 2002, 79, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Adams, M.R.; Nicolaides, L. Review of the sensitivity of different foodborne pathogens to fermentation. Food Control. 1997, 8, 227–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hammes, W.P.; Tichaczek, P.S. The potential of lactic acid bacteria for the production of safe and wholesome food. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 1994, 198, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Marco, M.L.; Heeney, D.; Binda, S.; Cifelli, C.J.; Cotter, P.; Foligne, B.; Gänzle, M.G.; Kort, R.; Pasin, G.; Pihlanto, A.; et al. Health benefits of fermented foods: Microbiota and beyond. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2017, 44, 94–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Iacumin, L.; Osualdini, M.; Bovolenta, S.; Boscolo, D.; Chiesa, L.; Panseri, S.; Comi, G. Microbial, chemico-physical and volatile aromatic compounds characterization of Pitina PGI, a peculiar sausage-like product of North East Italy. Meat Sci. 2020, 163, 108081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  83. Paleari, M.A.; Bersani, C.; Moretti Vittorio, M.; Beretta, G. Effect of curing and fermentation on the microflora of meat of various animal species. Food Control. 2002, 13, 195–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Håseth, T.T.; Thorkelsson, G.; Puolanne, E.; Sidhu, M.S. Nordic Products. In Handbook of Fermented Meat and Poultry, 2nd ed.; Toldrá, F., Ed.; Wiley-Blackwell: Chichester, UK, 2014; pp. 371–376. [Google Scholar]
  85. Stojković, S.; Grabež, V.; Bjelanovic, M.; Mandić, S.; Vucic, G.; Martinovic, A.; Håseth, T.T.; Velemir, A.; Egelandsdal, B. Production process and quality of two different dry-cured sheep hams from Western Balkan countries. LWT 2015, 64, 1217–1224. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Sebranek, J.G.; Bacus, J.N. Cured meat products without direct addition of nitrate or nitrite: What are the issues? Meat Sci. 2007, 77, 136–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. FAO. Discussion Paper on the Use of Nitrates (Ins 251, 252) and Nitrites (Ins 249, 250). 2019. Available online: http://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FMeetings%252FCX-711-51%252FWD%252Ffa51_09e.pdf (accessed on 11 July 2020).
  88. EFSA. EFSA Confirms Safe Levels for Nitrites and Nitrates Added to Food. 2017. Available online: https://www.efsa.europa.eu/en/press/news/170615 (accessed on 11 July 2020).
  89. Coll-Brasas, E.; Possas, A.; Berg, P.; Grabež, V.; Egelandsdal, B.; Bover-Cid, S.; Fulladosa, E. Physicochemical characterisation of restructured Fenalår and safety implications of salt and nitrite reduction. Food Control 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Andrés, A.I.; Petrón, M.J.; Adámez, J.D.; López, M.; Timón, M.L. Food by-products as potential antioxidant and antimicrobial additives in chill stored raw lamb patties. Meat Sci. 2017, 129, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Aliakbarlu, J.; Sadaghiani, S.K. Effect of Avishane Shirazi (Z ataria Multiflora) and Clove (S yzygium Aromaticum) Essential Oils on Microbiological, Chemical and Sensory Properties of Ground Sheep Meat During Refrigerated Storage. J. Food Qual. 2015, 38, 240–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Paulos, K.; Rodrigues, S.; Oliveira, A.F.; Leite, A.; Pereira, E.; Teixeira, A. Sensory Characterization and Consumer Preference Mapping of Fresh Sausages Manufactured with Goat and Sheep Meat. J. Food Sci. 2015, 80, S1568–S1573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  93. Tolentino, G.S.; Estevinho, L.M.; Pascoal, A.; Rodrigues, S.S.; Teixeira, A. Microbiological quality and sensory evaluation of new cured products obtained from sheep and goat meat. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017, 57, 391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Rodrigues, S.; Almeida, S.; Pereira, E.; Teixeira, A. How does the added fat source affect sensory quality of sheep and goat pâtés? Ciênc. Rural 2019, 49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Stajić, S.; Stanišić, N.; Perunovic, M.; Zivkovic, D.; Žujović, M. Possibilities for the use of goat meat in the production of traditional sucuk. Biotehnol. U Stoc. 2011, 27, 1489–1497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Villalobos-Delgado, L.H.; Caro, I.; Blanco, C.; Bodas, R.; Andrés, S.; Giráldez, F.J.; Mateo, J.; Giráldez, J. Effect of the addition of hop (infusion or powder) on the oxidative stability of lean lamb patties during storage. Small Rumin. Res. 2015, 125, 73–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Falowo, A.B.; Fayemi, P.O.; Muchenje, V. Natural antioxidants against lipid–protein oxidative deterioration in meat and meat products: A review. Food Res. Int. 2014, 64, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Faine, L.; Rodrigues, H.G.; Galhardi, C.M.; Ebaid, G.; Diniz, Y.; Fernandes, A.; Novelli, E. Butyl hydroxytoluene (BHT)-induced oxidative stress: Effects on serum lipids and cardiac energy metabolism in rats. Exp. Toxicol. Pathol. 2006, 57, 221–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Lorenzo, J.M.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Sánchez, M.; Amado, I.; Franco, D. Effects of natural (grape seed and chestnut extract) and synthetic antioxidants (buthylatedhydroxytoluene, BHT) on the physical, chemical, microbiological and sensory characteristics of dry cured sausage “chorizo”. Food Res. Int. 2013, 54, 611–620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Munekata, P.; Domínguez, R.; Franco, D.; Bermúdez, R.; Trindade, M.; Lorenzo, J.M. Effect of natural antioxidants in Spanish salchichón elaborated with encapsulated n-3 long chain fatty acids in konjac glucomannan matrix. Meat Sci. 2017, 124, 54–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Sahin, S.; Samli, R.; Tan, A.S.B.; Barba, F.J.; Chemat, F.; Cravotto, G.; Lorenzo, J.M. Solvent-Free Microwave-Assisted Extraction of Polyphenols from Olive Tree Leaves: Antioxidant and Antimicrobial Properties. Molecules 2017, 22, 1056. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  102. Lorenzo, J.M.; Munekata, P.; Sant’Ana, A.S.; Carvalho, R.B.; Barba, F.J.; Toldrá, F.; Mora, L.; Trindade, M. Main characteristics of peanut skin and its role for the preservation of meat products. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2018, 77, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Cunha, L.; Monteiro, M.L.G.; Lorenzo, J.M.; Munekata, P.E.; Muchenje, V.; De Carvalho, F.A.L.; Conte-Junior, C.A. Natural antioxidants in processing and storage stability of sheep and goat meat products. Food Res. Int. 2018, 111, 379–390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Ribeiro, J.; Santos, M.J.M.C.; Silva, L.K.R.; Pereira, L.C.L.; Santos, I.A.; Lannes, S.C.D.S.; Da Silva, M.V. Natural antioxidants used in meat products: A brief review. Meat Sci. 2019, 148, 181–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Fernandes, R.P.P.; Trindade, M.A.; Tonin, F.G.; Lima, C.G.; Pugine, S.M.P.; Munekata, P.E.S.; Lorenzo, J.M.; de Melo, M.P. Evaluation of antioxidant capacity of 13 plant extracts by three different methods: Cluster analyses applied for selection of the natural extracts with higher antioxidant capacity to replace synthetic antioxidant in lamb burgers. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 53, 451–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Lu, Y.; Young, O.A.; Brooks, J.D. Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of fermented sheepmeat sausage. Food Sci. Nutr. 2014, 2, 669–675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Nassu, R.T.; Gonçalves, L.A.G.; Beserra, F.J. Efeito do teor de gordura nas características químicas e sensoriais de embutido fermentado de carne de caprinos. Pesqui. Agropecu. Bras. 2002, 37, 1169–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Sañudo, C.; Monteiro, A.L.G.; Valero, M.V.; Fugita, C.A.; Monge, P.; Guerrero, A.; Campo, M.M. Cross-Cultural Study of Dry-Cured Sheep Meat Acceptability by Native and Immigrant Consumers in Spain. J. Sens. Stud. 2015, 31, 12–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. De Andrade, J.C.; Nalério, E.S.; Giongo, C.; De Barcellos, M.D.; Ares, G.; Deliza, R. Consumer perception of dry-cured sheep meat products: Influence of process parameters under different evoked contexts. Meat Sci. 2017, 130, 30–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  110. Everson, C.W.; Danner, W.E.; Hammes, P.A. Bacterial starter cultures in sausage products. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1970, 18, 570–571. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Wu, W.; Rule, D.; Busboom, J.; Field, R.; Ray, B. Starter Culture and Time/Temperature of Storage Influences on Quality of Fermented Mutton Sausage. J. Food Sci. 1991, 56, 916–919. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Nassu, R.T.; Gonçalves, L.A.G.; Beserra, F.J. Utilização de diferentes culturas starter no processamento de embutido fermentado de carne de caprinos. Ciênc. Rural 2002, 32, 1051–1055. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Mukherjee, R.S.; Chowdhury, B.R.; Chakraborty, R.; Chaudhuri, U.R. Effect of fermentation and drying temperature on the characteristics of goat meat (Black Bengal variety) dry sausage. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 2006, 5, 1499–1504. [Google Scholar]
  114. Canbaş, A.; Erten, H.; Özşahin, F. The effects of storage temperature on the chemical composition of hop pellets. Process. Biochem. 2001, 36, 1053–1058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Steinhaus, M.; Wilhelm, W.; Schieberle, P. Comparison of the most odour-active volatiles in different hop varieties by application of a comparative aroma extract dilution analysis. Eur. Food Res. Technol. 2006, 226, 45–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table 1. Summary of the principal studies and attributes measured on the physicochemical characterizations of processed sheep and goat meat products.
Table 1. Summary of the principal studies and attributes measured on the physicochemical characterizations of processed sheep and goat meat products.
ProductAttributes MeasuredEffects StudiedReferences
Restructured goat meatColor, pH, moisture, protein, fat, ash, TBARSNatural antioxidants on quality[40]
Lamb burgersMoisture, protein, fat, ash, fatty acid profileChemical and sensory quality[55]
Lamb hamburgerMoisture, protein, fat, ash, TBARS, cholesterol, pH, aW, cooking and texture characteristicsCotton level on chemical and sensory quality[56]
Goat nuggetspH, color, moisture, protein, fat, ash, texture, TBARSAntioxidant of bael pulp[49]
Goat pâtéMoisture, protein, fat, ash, color, pH, aW, mineralsVariety meat[57]
Lamb pâtépH, aW, moisture, protein, fat, color, nitritesStorage time on quality[59]
Sheep and goat pâtéspH, aW, dry matter, ashes, protein, fat, collagen, cholesterol, fatty acid profileFat sources and proportions on quality[11]
Goat pattiespH, moisture, protein, fat, ash, textureIncorporation of goat fat on quality[44]
Smoked goat ham pH, moisture, protein, fat, ash, NaCl, nitrites, fatty acid profile, volatile substancesDiet effect on nutritional value[65]
Cooked sheep ham pâtépH, aW, moisture, protein, fat, ashes, color, TBARS% sheep meat in mixture on quality[58]
Goat cured meatpH, aW, water holding capacity, color, myoglobin, textureSalting and ripening on meat quality[66]
Dry-cured Halal goat meatNaCl, pH, aWSalting time on meat quality[67]
Dry-cured lamb legpH, ash, moisture, protein, fat, NaCl, free fatty acids, volatile substancesTumbling on meat quality[46]
Goat “mantas”pH, aW, moisture, protein, fat and fatty acids, ashes, TBARSAdded value to culled animals[68]
Goat and sheep “mantas”pH, aW, water holding capacity, color, textureSpecies[69]
Goat and sheep cured legspH, ash, moisture, fat, protein, fatty acids, TBARS, NaCl, color, collagen, cholesterolSpecies, salting and ripening time[10]
Goat frankfurters Moisture, protein, fat, textureSource of fat on texture acceptability[37]
Mutton sausagesMoisture, aW, pH, fatDifferent starter cultures on quality[39]
Goat MortadellaMoisture, ashes, protein, fat, color, pH, aWPork fat level[38]
Sheep and goat SucukMoisture, fat, protein, ashes, colorEffect of sheep and goat[30]
Goat blood sausage Moisture, fat, protein, ashes, fatty acids, amino acids cholesterolDescriptive[70]
“Buchada” goatpH, aW, moisture, protein, fat, cholesterol, amino acidsDescriptive[71]
Chevon salamisMoisture, protein, extract ether, ashes, Descriptive[72]
Sheep pastramiWarner-Bratzler shear forceVacuuming pressuring on tenderizing[14]
Sheep and goat sausagespH, aW, moisture, protein, fat and fatty acids, ashes, TBARSDifferent pork back fat levels added[9]
Goat sausagesMoisture, fat, protein, ashes, fatty acids, cholesterolCombinations with beef[42]
Sheep sausagespH, color, texture, TBARS, free fatty acids, volatile compoundsOregano concentrations[73]
Goat frankfurterpH, ash, moisture, protein, fat, color, texture, fatty acid profileLevel goat meat [13]
TBARS—thiobarbituric acid reactive substances and aw—water activity.
Table 2. Principal studies on the sensory evaluations of new products from sheep and goat meats with trained or experienced panelists.
Table 2. Principal studies on the sensory evaluations of new products from sheep and goat meats with trained or experienced panelists.
ProductSpeciesAttributesPanelists (n)TrainingScaleReference
Dry-fermented sausagesGoat and beefAppearance, cut appearance, color, odor, texture and taste9Previous experience1—extremely unacceptable; 9—extremely acceptable[95]
Dry-cured legLambFlavor and texture 12Previous experience and two one-hour sessions1—lowest; 5—highest[46]
Fresh sausages with and without paprikaSheep and goatOdor intensity, off-odor presence, flavor, off-flavor, hardness, juiciness, fibers presence, spiciness and sweetness9TrainedStructured, unnumbered scale of 10 cm. Minimum (no sensation) to maximum (extremely intense sensation)[92]
Patties cookedLambOxidized flavor intensity7Trained two one-hour sessionsRanking test. 5-point descriptive scale, from 1 to 5 denoted imperceptible or extremely high oxidized flavor, respectively[96]
Freshly cooked pattiesLambHop flavor intensity6Trained one half-hour sessionRanking test[96]
Dry-cured hamsSheepAppearance, texture, flavor and aroma intensity8TrainedStructured scale with 9 points. Quantitative-descriptive analysis[85]
Dry-cured legsSheep and goatAppearance, taste, flavor and texture9Previous experience and specific trainingContinuous 10-cm scale. Left anchor-lowest intensity to right anchor-highest intensity[93]
Cured legsSheep and goatAppearance, aroma, taste and texture 10Previous experience and specific trainingContinuous 10-cm scale. Left anchor-lowest intensity to right anchor-highest intensity[10]
SausagesSheepSmell, taste, and appearance (control vs. N1, N2 and N3 levels of oregano extract)14TrainedVerbal scale with 0 to 6 numerical conversion scale using no, very slight, slight/moderate, moderate, moderate/large, large and very large differences, respectively[73]
FrankfurtersGoatColor, odor, taste, hardness and juiciness7TrainedIntensity scale test of 9 points for color, odor, taste, hardness and juiciness[13]
Cooked ham and Deli type sausagesSheep and goatColor, taste, odor and firmness10TrainedTriangular test and a structured lineal scale (10 cm) for each parameter to evaluate the found difference[92]
Sheep and goat pâtésSheep and goatAppearance, aroma intensity, taste intensity and texture8TrainedStructured but unnumbered 10-cm scale Minimum (no sensation) to maximum (extremely intense sensation)[94]
Table 3. Studies on the sensory evaluations of new products from sheep and goat meats using hedonic evaluations with different type of panelists.
Table 3. Studies on the sensory evaluations of new products from sheep and goat meats using hedonic evaluations with different type of panelists.
ProductSpeciesPanelists (n)Type of PanelistAttributesScaleReference
Fermented sausage with different levels of fat additionGoat30Nontrained individualsTexture, appearance, taste, aroma, overall acceptabilityHedonic nine-points scale. From dislike extremely (1) to like extremely (9)[107]
Mortadella prepared with different levels of fat Goat80Potential consumersAppearance, color, odor, flavor, overall acceptabilityHedonic nine-points scale. From dislike extremely (1) to like extremely (9)[38]
Cooked ham-type pâté Sheep50Nontrained panelistsOverall acceptabilityHedonic nine-points scale. From less preferred than the reference (1) to preferred more than the reference (9)[58]
Fermented sausageSheep60ConsumersLiking of flavor9-point category scale. From dislike extremely (1) to like extremely (9)[106]
Fresh sausages with and without paprikaSheep and goat 82ConsumersTaste, texture, spiciness, overall acceptabilityUnstructured 10-cm scale. Anchors at the extremities with do not like (0) to like very much (10)[92]
Fresh sausages with different levels of pork fatSheep and goat 26Nontrained individuals in 2 sessionsTaste, spicy taste, texture, overall acceptabilityUnstructured 10-cm scale. Anchors at the extremities with do not like (0) to like very much (10)[9]
PattiesLamb126Consumers Flavor score/likingStructured hedonic nine-points scale. From ranging from extremely disliking (1) to extremely liking (9)[96]
“Cecina” dry-cured legs with different fatness levelsSheep320Individuals (Chinese, sub-Saharan, Andeans, Spanish)Overall acceptabilityHedonic nine-points scale. From dislike extremely (1) to like extremely (9)[108]
Dry-cured hamSheep375IndividualsMaturation time, smoking, sodium reductionNo scale[109]
CoppaSheep375IndividualsNatural antioxidant, smoking, sodium reductionNo scale[109]
Frankfurters (25–100%) vs. beefGoat60Consumers (40% male, 60% female)Appearance, color, odor, taste, textureCATA (Check-all-that-apply) and rate (0–10) overall acceptance (liking)[13]
PâtésSheep and goat 25IndividualsGlobal acceptability10-cm scale. Anchors at the extremities with do not like (0) to like very much (10)[94]

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Teixeira, A.; Silva, S.; Guedes, C.; Rodrigues, S. Sheep and Goat Meat Processed Products Quality: A Review. Foods 2020, 9, 960. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods9070960

AMA Style

Teixeira A, Silva S, Guedes C, Rodrigues S. Sheep and Goat Meat Processed Products Quality: A Review. Foods. 2020; 9(7):960. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods9070960

Chicago/Turabian Style

Teixeira, Alfredo, Severiano Silva, Cristina Guedes, and Sandra Rodrigues. 2020. "Sheep and Goat Meat Processed Products Quality: A Review" Foods 9, no. 7: 960. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/foods9070960

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop