Next Article in Journal
Biochar-Supported TiO2-Based Nanocomposites for the Photocatalytic Degradation of Sulfamethoxazole in Water—A Review
Previous Article in Journal
Prenatal Exposure to Chemical Mixtures and Inhibition among Adolescents
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Toxics
Volume 9
Issue 11
10.3390/toxics9110312
toxics-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Phytoextraction of Cr(VI)-Contaminated Soil by Phyllostachys pubescens: A Case Study

by
Ezio Ranieri
1,*,
Gianfranco D’Onghia
1,
Francesca Ranieri
2,
Andrea Petrella
3,
Vincenzo Spagnolo
4 and
Ada Cristina Ranieri
4,5
1
Dipartimento di Biologia, Università di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy
2
Dipartimento di Giurisprudenza, Università di Bari, 70121 Bari, Italy
3
Dipartimento Dicatech, Politecnico di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy
4
Dipartimento Interateneo di Fisica, Politecnico di Bari, 70125 Bari, Italy
5
Università Telematica Internazionale Uninettuno, 00186 Roma, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Toxics 2021, 9(11), 312; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics9110312
Submission received: 10 October 2021 / Revised: 5 November 2021 / Accepted: 15 November 2021 / Published: 18 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Section Toxicity Reduction and Environmental Remediation)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
This work presents the results of experimental tests to evaluate the effects of prolonged contamination by Cr on Moso Bamboo (MB) (Phyllostachys pubescens) and the adaptability of the MB to the Mediterranean climate. A preliminary test on the MB was developed in the laboratory, simulating irrigation under Mediterranean conditions (600 mm per year) and tropical conditions (1800 mm per year), to evaluate the rate of growth and the MB’s capability for Cr phytoextraction from contaminated soil. The tolerance of MB to Cr was also performed showing a good response of the plant to 100 mg Cr/L solution, utilized for irrigation of the pots. The results show that the rate of MB’s removal of Cr from soil ranged from 49.2% to 61.7% as a function of the soil degree of contamination, which varied from approx. 100 mg/kg to 300 mg/kg. The distribution of Cr in the various sections of the bamboo revealed that the greater percentage was present in rhizomes: 42%, equal to 114 mg Cr for 600 mm per year, and 50%, equal to 412 mg Cr for 1800 mm per year. A noteworthy diffusion of the metal towards the outermost parts of the plant was shown. The values of Cr retained in the stems and leaves of MB tissues were quite high and varied from 1100 mg/kg to 1700 mg/kg dry weight.

1. Introduction

Phytoremediation is one of the best alternatives to conventional physicochemical remediation technologies, which produce secondary pollution, are highly expensive, and can deteriorate soil fertility [1,2,3,4]. For phytoextraction, model plants should possess a wide root apparatus with a high yield of biomass in the presence of an elevated heavy metal mass [5].
Chromium is required as a nutrient for human metabolism with consumption of 100 µg daily, but excessive exposure to Cr(VI) has toxic effects on human health, particularly on the respiratory system [6,7,8,9,10]. Chromium represents a wide concern in soil contamination, including in Italy [11].
In phytoremediation, plants used in phytoextraction, such as Jerusalem artichoke [12] and Moso Bamboo (MB)—Phyllostachys pubescens (Figure 1)—should exhibit good transfer of the metal from the roots to the aboveground parts (measured via the translocation factor), must be resistant and accumulate high levels of heavy metal (measured via the bioconcentration factor), and should have a rapid growth rate [13].
Plant growth is not inhibited for a soil concentration up to 100 mg Cr/kg dry weight [14,15,16,17]. However, bamboo plants show some negative effects in respect to growth and in plant organs for metal-contaminated soils with more than 300 mg/kg dry weight [5].
Bamboo species had a survival rate of 100% for all the species grown for a soil concentration of around 100 mg Cr/kg [18]. Therefore, it is supposed that MB should tolerate a higher metal stress, and there is potential to use MB as a phytoremediation material for Cr-contaminated soil up to 200–300 mg Cr/kg.
In experiments with 1000 mg/kg Cr(VI), stem growth was found to be drastically reduced for 94% of examined plant species [19], confirming that Cr excess can cause many plant metabolic changes and reduce their growth [20]. However, in some plants, Cr at a low level (0.05–1.0 mg L−1) promotes growth and yield, especially in crops, but it has not been proven essential to plants [21,22]. Plants use different mechanisms to control the toxic effects of Cr, accumulating it in their tissues through uptake via the roots and subsequent translocation [23].
Chromium phytoextraction depends on the specific hyperaccumulator–contaminant interaction [24,25,26,27,28,29].
Plants that accumulate more than 500 mg Cr/kg in dry leaf tissue can be considered hyperaccumulators [30]. They can stabilize Cr in the soil through their roots and aboveground tissues by one or several mechanisms, converting it to Cr(III) [31].
MB is easily adaptable to a typical Mediterranean climate [32] and it has shown a great ability to accumulate metals with high biomass production; this occurs via the plant’s ability to uptake metals that are essential for its growth. This implies, in the case of positive results at the experimental level, easy applicability of the intervention at full scale [26,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43].
The growth rates of the culms of bamboo species have earned this group of plants the status of being the fastest-growing grasses on Earth [44]. MB rapidly reaches its maximum size with an average height of 15 m. Bamboo shoots rise above the ground within 35–40 days, reaching 15–20 m in height and 10–12 cm in diameter [45].
MB is characterized by high biomass productivity, ease in cultivation, extensive competitive ability, a short cutting time (4–5 years), and multiple uses such as for furniture, building materials, and decoration. Furthermore, it is known as the most promising species for carbon sequestration [46,47], and it has a high mean aboveground carbon sequestration value (8 ± 2.15 MgC ha−1 year−1) [48].
Toxics 09 00312 g001 550
Figure 1. Roots, rhizome, stem, and leaves in MB (Phyllostachys pubescens) [49].
Figure 1. Roots, rhizome, stem, and leaves in MB (Phyllostachys pubescens) [49].
Toxics 09 00312 g001
On the basis of our previous work [11], wherein an experimental study was carried out in the laboratory to evaluate MB’s tolerance and capacity for Cr phytoextraction and was developed in three stages.
The aim of this work was to confirm MB’s growth rate, resistance, and phytoextraction capacity in Cr-contaminated soil over a prolonged contamination time.
A results comparison across the two experiments allowed us to evaluate the differences in the plant response as a consequence of Cr irrigation time during the entire process.
Specifically, in this study, the use of MB for phytoremediation was investigated for the following purposes:
To recognize its ability to develop in different environments;
To evaluate MB’s tolerance in Cr-contaminated soils;
To quantify its long-term Cr phytoextraction capacity;
To evaluate the migration capacity of Cr within the plant;
To assess the difference in the Cr content in plant sections as a function of different phytoextraction timings.

2. Materials and Methods

The three different phases of the experiment all had the same duration of 84 days. The first phase objective was to compare the development of MB in an environment differing from that where it originated, characterized by a tropical or subtropical climate, and its development in a typical Mediterranean climate. Week by week, growth was monitored through the measurement of the growth rates of the main morphological parts of the plant, such as stems and leaves.
During the second phase, a tolerance evaluation was conducted through the measurement of MB’s growth in soil contaminated by a Cr(VI) solution. Changes in the morphological structures were measured weekly, allowing the growth rates to be calculated under stress.
During the last 84 days—the third phase—the amount of Cr(VI) that had moved from the soil to the various parts of the plant was evaluated, the main plant areas affected by increased accumulation were identified, and the results were translated into a mass balance.
The specimens were taken from MB plants and soil purchased from Tiberio Tricarico Ltd. Garden Centre (Terlizzi, Bari, Italy). Different types of tests—specifically, adaptability, contamination, and soil Cr(VI) sorption tests—were carried out for the roots, rhizomes, stems, and leaves of the plants.
The soil medium was characterized by a mixture of peat (blond/brown) and vegetable conditioner and showed a density of approximately 0.25 kg/L, C(org) ≅ 20% dry weight (dw) N ≅ 1% dw, pH ≅ 6.9. The four pots employed for the experimental campaign (diameter = 250 mm, height = 200 mm, volume = 10 L) were filled with approximately 4 kg of soil.
To contaminate the soil in the four pots, K2Cr2O7 was used in the appropriate quantity to form an aqueous solution of 100 mg Cr/L [18].
The irrigation throughout the first two steps was carried out with tap water showing the following chemical composition: HCO3− = 270 mg/L; NO3− = 8 mg/L; Ca2+ = 30.9 mg/L; K+ = 27.7 mg/L; F− = 1 mg/L; Mg2+ = 9.5 mg/L. The rainfall regime and the diameter of the soil bed were the parameters used to evaluate the irrigation volume. Specifically, the experimental flows (Q) for the growth and contamination tests were obtained in accordance with the rainfall regimes associated with climates in the Apulia region (1.64 mm/d) and tropical areas (4.93 mm/d) using the same type of soil but irrigated with different amounts of water; accordingly, the values were Q1 = 0.0805 L/d for the first case and 0.242 L/d for the second case.

2.1. Analysis of the Bamboo Growth

An estimation of the bamboo growth was obtained after measuring the plant height every week. The measurements started when the plants reached the following heights:
57.2 cm and 54.9 cm for Pots 1 and 2, respectively, for MB growth with 1.64 mm/d tap water.
97.2 cm and 96.5 cm for Pots 3 and 4, respectively, for MB growth with 4.93 mm/d tap water.
The elongation of a single element, cluster, or whole stem from each underground rhizome system was recorded by a camera, which allowed us to evaluate the actual growth of the bamboo plants.

2.2. Sample Preparation and Characterization

The selected samples were submitted to chemical digestion after the following preliminary steps. In the first step, a thermal treatment at 75 °C was carried out for moisture removal, followed by mixing and sieving (2 mm mesh) processes. Afterwards, the different parts of bamboo as roots, rhizomes, stems, and leaves were obtained after separation and were washed with tap and demi-water to remove the excess soil grains; then, they were dried at 75 °C. Finally, a milling process was carried out in order to obtain particles of approximately 0.2 mm, which were chemically digested. Specifically, a mixture of HNO3 and HCl (7:1) was used for the digestion of 0.5 g of sample in a PFA/TFM oven (4.93 W), and the solution was then diluted to 50 mL.
A 20 mL mixture of HNO3 and HCl (1:4) was added to 1.5 g of dried soil specimens in a digestion tube. The operations were carried out at 160 °C in a fume chamber by a digestion block and stopped when the final volume of solution was approximately 4 mL. The addition of 20 mL of HNO3 and HCl (1:4) solution continued until a final volume of 5 mL was reached by thermal treatment. Afterwards, the solution was filtered (10 µm membrane Isopore Merck filters) and the liquid was diluted to 25 mL. Finally, the solutions of the digested samples together with the references were characterized by ICP-OES in order to obtain the total Cr concentration (milligrams per kilogram of dry weight (DW)). Specifically, the Cr values were obtained in the soil before MB transplanting, whereas the Cr determinations of rhizosphere soils, roots, rhizomes, stems, and leaves were carried out six months after MB transplanting. All chemicals were purchased from Aldrich, were of suprapur grade, and were used as received without further purification or distillation.

2.3. Statistical Analysis

The samples were analyzed in triplicate, and the data obtained are reported as the mean ± standard deviation. In order to evaluate statistically significant differences among values, all data regarding wet and dry weight measurements and the Cr contents of plant tissues (roots, rhizomes, stem, and leaves) were analyzed via one-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s test (p < 0.05). A two-way repeated-measures ANOVA was used to analyze the relationship between plant height and stem diameter growth, treatment, and time.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Growth Rate Test on MB

Adaptation tests were carried out prior to the growth test to verify the ability of the plants to adapt to a climate different from that of their natural habitat. The 84-day growth test was carried out in a laboratory-controlled environment, in which the following parameters were constantly monitored: soil pH (6.9), light exposure (14 h light and 10 h dark), temperature (20 °C), and optimal irrigation volume (1.64 mm/d for pots 1,2 and 4.93 mm/d for pots 3,4).
The growth rate, intended to represent the growth rates of the different morphological parts and the overall plant, was defined through length variation measurements carried out weekly. The results are shown in Figure 2 for Pots 1 and 2 and in Figure 3 for Pots 3 and 4. In both cases, the bamboo plants showed good adaptation capacity. The growth rate gr was very similar for Pots 1 and 2 (1.64 mm/d) and averaged 3.29 cm/week; for Pots 3 and 4 (4.93 mm/d), gr was 5.85 cm/week on average. The interpolation curve was linear in the four cases: h = 3.39 (weeks) + 53.56 with R2 > 0.99 for Pot 1; h = 3.16 (weeks) + 51.18 with R2 = 0.9964 for Pot 2; h = 5.933 (weeks) + 91.302 with R2 = 0.996 for Pot 3; and h = 5.854 (weeks) + 90.057 with R2 > 0.99 for Pot 4. For both climate cases, the growth rate gr was lower than that in the previous experiment [11], where the growth rate gr was 4.56 cm/week for Pots 1 and 2 and 8.45 cm/week for Pots 3 and 4. The total elongation, similar in both pots for each irrigation rate, also seems to be lower than that observed in natural conditions for MB [50,51].

3.2. Contamination and Tolerance Test

The treatment with the contaminant lasted about three months according to the concentration of the contaminant solution. Otherwise, low metal exposure (<100 mg kg−1) does not inhibit plant growth in pot experiments [52].
At the end of our lab tests, the data obtained were the weekly growth rate for each plant and the morphological development of the plants after the contamination, revealed by analysis of the Cr adsorbed in samples of the different structures of the plant. At a concentration of 100 mg Cr/L in irrigation water, in both Pots 1 and 2, the bamboo plants still maintained their vegetative functions.
In the first pot, the growth interpolation curve was h = 93.94 × 100.008 (weeks) with R2 > 0.99, and the second pot had the equation h = 89.132 × 100.007 (weeks) with R2 > 0.99 (Figure 4).
Similar to in Pots 1 and 2, MB in Pots 3 and 4, where the soil was contaminated with an aqueous solution of 100 mg Cr/L, does not show symptoms of contamination stress.
Bamboo tolerance in Pots 3 and 4 was higher than that under the 1.64 mm/d conditions, and a higher gr was also revealed. The interpolation curve for Pot 3 was h = 162.48 × 100.0056 (weeks) with R2 = 0.9672; the same curve for Pot 4 was h = 160.34 × 100.0061 (weeks) with R2 = 0.9514 (Figure 5). In both cases, there was an increase in plant tolerance compared to that in the previous experiment [11], probably due to the higher volume of biomass developed [53,54,55,56].
The administration of Cr induced significant changes in tissue morphological parameters after the fifth or sixth week. These consequences affected the roots and rhizomes more than the stem and leaves, with a greater volume reduction and a more pronounced decrease in the number of new shoots.

3.3. Cr Phytoextraction from the Soil

Previous contamination tests [11] also aimed to quantify how much Cr the MB plant is able to retain, considering that approx. 40% of the flow containing Cr leached away from the bottom of the pot. Chromium belongs to the second class of hazard according to the Russian general toxicological standard for soil [11].
Figure 6 shows the phytoextraction capacity of bamboo and the soil Cr content after three months for the 1.64 mm/d pots; Figure 7 shows the same for the 4.93 mm/d pots. The residual concentration of Cr in the soils after the experimentation ranged from 50.1 to 51.8 mg/kg for Pots 2 and 1, respectively (Figure 6), and from 115.7 to 122.5 mg/kg for Pots 4 and 3, respectively (Figure 7). The soil analysis results indicated that the Cr levels were reduced considerably by the plants growing on the contaminated soils, with a removal rate of 50%—similar to those in other experiments [57] and higher than that in the previous study [11], in which the Cr removal percentages from soil ranging from 43.3 to 44.7% starting from a contamination of approx. 105 mg/kg dw for 600 mm/year and ranging from 44.3 to 47.5% starting from a contamination of approx. 295 mg/kg dw for 1800 mm/year, in 12 weeks.
The percentage of Cr removal from soil ranged from 49.2% to 50.4% (Pots 1 and 2) when starting from a contamination of approximately 102 mg/kg, and it ranged from 59.3% to 61.7% (Pots 3 and 4) when starting from a contamination of approximately 302 mg/kg. The interpolating curve for Pot 1 was [Cr] = 108.87 × 10−0.058 (weeks) with R2 = 0.962, and that for Pot 2 was [Cr] = 106.64 × 10−0.058 (weeks) with R2 = 0.982 (Figure 6). For Pots 3 and 4, the corresponding curves were [Cr] = 0.3682(week)2 −19.943(week) + 314 with R2 = 0.99 and [Cr] = 0.6989(week)2 −24.852(week) + 319 with R2 = 0.99 (Figure 7), respectively, showing a higher tendency to continue phytoextraction over time. The soil characteristics significantly influence the Cr absorption capacity of the plant. In fact, in soil rich in humid acids, the metal is predisposed to creating bonds with acids in a preferential way, thus reducing the phytoextraction capacity of the plant. This has been confirmed by other studies [58], and the phenomenon involves a reduction in bioavailability of up to 57% [23].
The results confirm that a greater presence of biomass is associated with greater efficacy in phytoextraction and a greater amount of extracted Cr [43,53].

3.4. Cr Distribution in Tissues

After the contamination test, samples of roots and leaves were taken from all plants to determine the distribution of metal in the plant tissues. The Cr concentrations in the aerial parts of the plants were found to be low; this could be due to the fact that the poisoning period was insufficient to exceed the tolerance limit of the roots and rhizomes and therefore did not allow the time necessary for the translocation of the metal to the outer parts [59]. The higher concentration of metal in the roots and rhizomes confirmed that MB concentrates Cr principally in the rhizome–root system by limiting transport to the aerial parts—parts included in the animal and human food chain [60,61,62,63]. In Figure 8a,b, the distribution of the Cr in the bamboo tissues is shown for 600 mm/y and 1800 mm/y, respectively. As shown in Figure 8a, Cr was mainly accumulated in the root–rhizome apparatus, at a level of approximately 173 mg Cr, representing 64% of the total Cr retained. Comparable percentages (Figure 8b) of Cr were revealed in Pots 3 and 4, irrigated with 4.93 mm/d, with a slightly lower translocation rate and where the Cr content in leaves was approximately 18%. These results show some differences from the previous work [11], where an average of 69% of Cr was detected in the rhizome and 18% in the roots, while only 6 % and 7% were found in the stem and leaves, respectively. In this case, the percentages stored by the outermost parts of the plant grew significantly to 19%; conversely, the presence of Cr in the rhizomes was reduced by up to 46%, on average. The variations indicate greater diffusion of Cr inside the plant over time, perhaps due to the plant’s adaptation to metal, which implies a sort of predisposition of the plant to store Cr during growth in all sections of the plant. Other studies have reported that bamboo accumulates three-quarters of its entire biomass in only 40 days, and this happens in the initial growth stage [64].
Figure 9 reports a comparison between the results of this investigation and the previous experiment [11] in terms of milligrams of Cr adsorbed per gram of biomass dw in the different sections of the plant. The values of Cr retained in the MB tissues were quite high and varied for stems and leaves from 1100 mg/kg dw to 1700 mg/kg dw and from 2900 mg/kg dw to 5500 mg/kg dw for roots and rhizomes, respectively for pots 1–2 and for pots 3–4 without showing toxic effects that could alter physiological and metabolic pathways [65]. These values are comparable with those for other hyperaccumulator species such as Cannabis sativa and Allium griffithianum, which can accumulate higher concentrations of Cr ranging from 568.33 to 1233.3 mg/kg [66], and Diectomis fastigiata, which can accumulate Cr in roots at about 2371 mg/kg, while Vernonia cinerea can accumulate 5500 mg/kg dry weight Cr in shoots [67].
The values in milligrams of Cr per gram of biomass shown are slightly lower than the values observed in the previous experiment [11], particularly for Pots 3 and 4, due to the greater development of biomass, and they should reflect higher tolerance to Cr. Moreover, it should be noted that there is a tendency of the plant to store other Cr during subsequent growth, confirming the possibility for MB to act as a hyperaccumulator of the metal.

4. Conclusions

Moso Bamboo showed good growth in lab conditions under 1.64 mm/d irrigation conditions, with an average value of 3.29 cm/week, and under 4.93 mm/d irrigation conditions, with an average value of 5.85 cm/week.
The results regarding the tolerance of the plant to Cr showed a good response of the plant to 100 mg Cr/L solution, utilized for irrigation of the pots. Plant growth during exposure to Cr was reduced to about 1 cm/week, as average.
The Cr removal percentages were also noteworthy, showing that the rate of MB’s removal of Cr from soil ranged from 49.2% to 61.7% as a function of the soil degree of contamination.
The values of Cr retained in the MB tissues were quite high and varied for stems and leaves from 1100 mg/kg dw to 1700 mg/kg dw and from 2900 mg/kg dw to 5500 mg/kg dw for roots and rhizomes, respectively.
Moso Bamboo showed good adaptability to the Mediterranean climate and high performance in the removal of Cr from soil with potential application on large-scale remediation sites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.R. and G.D.; formal analysis, F.R.; investigation, A.C.R.; data curation, A.P.; writing—original draft preparation, E.R.; writing—review and editing, E.R. and G.D.; visualization, V.S.; supervision, E.R. and G.D.; project administration, E.R. and V.S.; funding acquisition, E.R. and G.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This investigation was partially supported by the Italian Miur Progetto Operativo Nazionale PON “Taranto”.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Uniba and Poliba technical personnel for their support in laboratory operations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ali, H.; Khan, E.; Sajad, M.A. Phytoremediation of heavy metals—Concepts and applications. Chemosphere 2013, 91, 869–881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Chandra, R.; Saxena, G.; Kumar, V. Phytoremediation of environmental pollutants: An eco-sustainable green technology to environmental management. In Advances in Biodegradation and Bioremediation of Industrial Waste, 1st ed.; CRC Press LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA; Taylor and Francis Group LLC: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2015; pp. 1–30. [Google Scholar]
  3. Mahar, A.; Wang, P.; Ali, A.; Awasthi, M.K.; Lahori, A.H.; Wang, Q.; Li, R.; Zhang, Z. Challenges and opportunities in the phytoremediation of heavy metals contaminated soils: A review. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2016, 126, 111–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Muthusaravanan, S.; Sivarajasekar, N.; Vivek, J.S.; Paramasivan, T.; Naushad, M.; Prakashmaran, J.; Gayathri, V.; Al-Duaij, O.K. Phytoremediation of heavy metals: Mechanisms, methods and enhancements. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 1339–1359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, J.; Shafi, M.; Li, S.; Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Ye, Z.; Peng, D.; Yan, W.; Liu, D. Copper induced oxidative stresses, antioxidant responses and phytoremediation potential of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens). Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 13554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  6. Achmad, R.T.; Budiawan; Auerkari, E.I. Effects of Chromium on Human Body. Annu. Res. Rev. Biol. 2017, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  7. Cary, E.E. Chromium in air, soils, and natural waters. In Biological and Environmental Aspects of Chromium; Langard, S., Ed.; Elsevier Biomedical: New York, NY, USA, 1982; pp. 49–63. [Google Scholar]
  8. Ranieri, E. Chromium and nickel control in full- and small-scale subsuperficial flow constructed wetlands. Soil Sediment Contam. 2012, 21, 802–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ranieri, E. Hydraulics of sub-superficial flow constructed wetlands in semi arid climate conditions. Water Sci. Technol. 2003, 47, 49–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Das, B.K.; Das, P.K.; Das, B.P.; Dash, P. Green technology to limit the effects of hexavalent chromium contaminated water bodies on public health and vegetation at industrial sites. J. App. Bio. Biotech. 2021, 9, 28–35. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ranieri, E.; Tursi, A.; Giuliano, S.; Spagnolo, V.; Ranieri, A.C.; Petrella, A. Phytoextraction from Chromium-Contaminated Soil Using Moso Bamboo in Mediterranean Conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2020, 231, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Antonkiewicz, J.; Kołodziej, B.; Bielińska, E.J.; Witkowicz, R.; Tabor, S. Using Jerusalem Artichoke to Extract Heavy Metals from Municipal Sewage Sludge Amended Soil. Pol. J. Environ. Stud. 2018, 27, 513–527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ullah, S.; Mahmood, S.; Ali, R.; Khan, M.R.; Akhtar, K.; Depar, N. Comparing chromium phyto-assessment in Brachiaria mutica and Leptochloa fusca growing on chromium polluted soil. Chemosphere 2021, 269, 128728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Michaud, A.; Peczalski, R.; Andrieu, J. Optimization of crystalline powders vacuum contact drying with intermittent stirring. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 2008, 86, 606–611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Collin, B.; Doelsch, E.; Keller, C.; Panfili, F.; Meunier, J.D. Effects of silicon and copper on bamboo grown hydroponically. Environ. Sci. Pollut. R. 2013, 20, 6482–6495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Chen, J.R.; Peng, D.L.; Shafi, M.; Li, S.; Wu, J.S.; Ye, Z.Q.; Wang, Y.; Yan, W.B.; Liu, D. Phytoremediation Potential of Moso Bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) for Zinc and Ultrastructure Changes Under Zinc Toxicity. Russ. J. Ecol. 2015, 46, 444–449. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Liu, D.; Li, S.; Islam, E.; Chen, J.; Wu, J.; Ye, Z.; Peng, D.; Yan, W.; Lu, K. Lead accumulation and tolerance of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys pubescens) seedlings: Applications of phytoremediation. J. Zhejiang Univ.-Sci. B (Biomed. Biotechnol.) 2015, 16, 123–130. [Google Scholar]
  18. American Public Health Association. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, 20th ed.; American Public Health Association: Washington, DC, USA, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, S.; Chen, T.; Liu, E.; Liu, C.P. Accessing the nursing behaviour of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys edilus) on carbohydrates dynamics and photosystems. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 1015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Lukina, A.; Boutin, C.; Rowland, O.; Carpenter, D. Evaluating trivalent chromium toxicity on wild terrestrial and wetland plants. Chemosphere 2016, 162, 355–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Kumar, S.; Prasad, S.; Yadav, K.K.; Shrivastava, M.; Gupta, N.; Nagar, S.; Bach, Q.; Kamyab, H.; Khan, S.A.; Yadav, S.; et al. Hazardous heavy metals contamination of vegetables and food chain: Role of sustainable remediation approaches—A review. Environ. Res. 2019, 179, 108792. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Oliveira, H. Chromium as an Environmental Pollutant: Insights on Induced Plant Toxicity. J. Bot. 2012, 2012, 375843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kalčíková, G.; Zupančič, M.; Jemec, A.; Gotvajn, A.Ž. The impact of humic acid on chromium phytoextraction by aquatic macrophyte Lemna minor. Chemosphere 2016, 147, 311–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Arshad, M.; Silvestre, J.; Pinelli, E.; Kallerhoff, J.; Kaemmerer, M.; Tarigo, A.; Shahid, M.; Guiresse, M.; Pradere, P.; Dumat, C. A field study of lead phytoextraction by various scented Pelargonium cultivars. Chemosphere 2008, 71, 2187–2192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Haq, S.; Bhatti, A.A.; Dar, Z.A.; Bhat, S.A. Phytoremediation of Heavy Metals: An Eco-Friendly and Sustainable Approach. Bioremed. Biotechnol. 2020, 215–231. [Google Scholar]
  26. Anderson, C.; Moreno, F.; Meech, J. A field demonstration of gold phytoextraction technology. Miner. Eng. 2005, 18, 385–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Cho-Ruk, K.; Kurukote, J.; Supprung, P.; Vetayasupo, S. Perennial Plants in the Phytoremediation of Lead-contaminated Soils. Biotechnology 2005, 5, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. McGrath, S.P.; Lombi, E.; Gray, C.W.; Caille, N.; Dunham, S.J.; Zhao, F.J. Field evaluation of Cd and Zn phytoextraction potential by the hyperaccumulators Thlaspi caerulescens and Arabidopsis helleri. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 141, 115–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Karimi, N.; Ghaderian, S.M.; Raab, A.; Feldmann, J.; Meharg, A. An arsenic-accumulating, hypertolerant brassica, Isatis capadocica: Rapid report. New Phytol. 2009, 184, 41–47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Baker, A.; McGrath, S.; Reeves, R.; Smith, J. Metal hyperaccumulator plants: A review of the ecology and physiology of a biological resource for phytoremediation of metal-polluted soils. In Phytoremediation of Contaminated Soils; Terry, N., Vangronsveld, J., Banuelos, G., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2000; pp. 85–107. [Google Scholar]
  31. López-Luna, J.; González-Chávez, M.; Esparza-García, F.; Rodríguez-Vázquez, R. Toxicity assessment of soil amended with tannery sludge, trivalent chromium and hexavalent chromium, using wheat, oat and sorghum plants. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 163, 829–834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kalimeris, A.; Ranieri, E.; Founda, D.; Norrant, D. Variability modes of precipitation along a Central Mediterranean area and their relations with ENSO, NAO, and other climatic patterns. Atmos. Res. 2017, 198, 56–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ranieri, E.; Świetlik, J. DBPS control in European drinking water treatment plants using chlorine dioxide: Two case studies. J. Environ. Eng. Landsc. Manag. 2010, 18, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Van Lienden, C.; Shan, L.; Rao, S.; Ranieri, E.; Young, T.M. Metals Removal from Stormwater by Commercial and Non-Commercial Granular Activated Carbons. Water Environ. Res. 2010, 82, 351–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Petrella, A.; Mascolo, G.; Murgolo, S.; Petruzzelli, V.; Ranieri, E.; Spasiano, D.; Petruzzelli, D. Photocatalytic Oxidation of Organic Micro-Pollutants: Pilot Plant Investigation and Mechanistic Aspects of the Degradation Reaction. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2016, 203, 1298–1307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Ciudin, R.; Isarie, C.; Cioca, L.; Petrescu, V.; Nederita, V.; Ranieri, E. Vacuum waste collection system for an historical city centre. Sci. Bull. 2014, 76, 215–222. [Google Scholar]
  37. Ranieri, E.; Rada, E.C.; Ragazzi, M.; Masi, S.; Montanaro, C. Critical analysis of the integration of residual municipal solid waste incineration and selective collection in two Italian tourist areas. Waste Manag. Res. 2014, 32, 551–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Ranieri, E.; Gikas, P. Effects of Plants for Reduction and Removal of Hexavalent Chromium from a Contaminated Soil. Water Air Soil Pollut. 2014, 225, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Al-Bataina, B.B.; Young, T.M.; Ranieri, E. Effects of compost age on the release of nutrients. Int. Soil Water Conserv. Res. 2016, 4, 230–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Petrella, A.; Petruzzelli, V.; Ranieri, E.; Catalucci, V.; Petruzzelli, D. Sorption of Pb(II), Cd(II) and Ni(II) from single- and multimetal solutions by recycled waste porous glass. Chem. Eng. Commun. 2016, 203, 940–947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gorgoglione, A.; Gioia, A.; Iacobellis, V.; Piccinni, A.F. A Rationale for Pollutograph Evaluation in Ungauged Areas, Using Daily Rainfall Patterns: Case Studies of the Apulian Region in Southern Italy. Appl. Environ. Soil Sci. 2016, 2016, 9327614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  42. Capodaglio, A.G.; Ranieri, E.; Torretta, V. Process enhancement for maximization of methane production in codigestion biogas plants. Manag. Environ. Qual. Int. J. 2016, 27, 289–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ranieri, E.; Moustakas, K.; Barbafieri, M.; Ranieri, A.C.; Herrera-Melián, J.A.; Petrella, A.; Tommasi, F. Phytoextraction technologies for mercury- and chromium-contaminated soil: A review. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2020, 95, 317–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bosire, G.O. Rehabilitation and Phytoremediation of Heavy Metal Polluted Riverine Wetlands Using Bamboo for Phytoextraction in Kibera. Ph.D. Thesis, Kenyatta University, Nairobi, Kenya, 2014. Available online: http://ir-library.ku.ac.ke/handle/123456789/9256 (accessed on 1 November 2021).
  45. Bian, F.; Zhong, Z.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Gai, X. Bamboo—An untapped plant resource for the phytoremediation of heavy metal contaminated soils. Chemosphere 2020, 246, 125750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zachariah, E.J.; Sabulal, B.; Nair, D.N.K.; Johnson, A.J.; Kumar, C.S.P.; Elavinamannil, Z. Carbon dioxide emission from bamboo culms. Plant Biol. 2016, 18, 400–405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Li, Y.; Zhou, G.; Jiang, P.; Wu, J.; Lin, L. Carbon Accumulation and Carbon Forms in Tissues During the Growth of Young Bamboo (Phyllostachy pubescens). Bot. Rev. 2011, 77, 278–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Zhou, G.; Meng, C.; Jiang, P.; Xu, Q. Review of Carbon Fixation in Bamboo Forests in China. Bot. Rev. 2011, 77, 262–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Song, X.; Peng, C.; Zhou, G.; Gu, H.; Li, Q.; Zhang, C. Dynamic allocation and transfer of non-structural carbohydrates, a possible mechanism for the explosive growth of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla). Sci. Rep. 2016, 6, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Xu, Y.; Wong, M.; Yang, J.; Ye, Z.; Jiang, P.; Zheng, S. Dynamics of Carbon Accumulation During the Fast Growth Period of Bamboo Plant. Bot. Rev. 2011, 77, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Song, X.; Peng, C.; Zhou, G.; Jiang, H.; Wang, W.F.; Xiang, W.H. Climate warming-induced upward shift of Moso bamboo population on Tianmu Mountain, China. J. Mt. Sci. 2013, 10, 363–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Were, F.H.; Wafula, G.A.; Wairungu, S. Phytoremediation Using Bamboo to Reduce the Risk of Chromium Exposure from a Contaminated Tannery Site in Kenya. J. Health Pollut. 2017, 7, 12–25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Pulford, I.D.; Riddell-Black, D.; Stewart, C. Heavy metal uptake by willow clones from sewage sludge-treated soil: The potential for phytoremediation. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2002, 4, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Purdy, J.J.; Smart, L.B. Hydroponic screening of shrub willow (Salix spp.) for arsenic tolerance and uptake. Int. J. Phytoremediat. 2008, 10, 515–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Melo, È.E.C.; Nascimento, C.W.A.; Accioly, A.M.; Santos, A.C.Q. Phytoextraction and fractionation of heavy metals in soil after multiple applications of natural chelants. Sci. Agric. 2008, 65, 61–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  56. Shelmerdine, P.A.; Black, C.R.; McGrath, S.P.; Young, S.D. Modelling phytoremediation by the hyperaccumulating fern, Pteris vittata, of soils historically contaminated with arsenic. Environ. Pollut. 2009, 157, 1589–1596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gadd, G.M. Phytoremediation of toxic metals; using plants to clean up the environment. Edited by ilya raskin and burt D ensley, john wiley sons, inc, New York, 2000, 304 pp, price UK£ 58.80, ISBN 0 471 19254 6. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2001, 76, 325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. De Carvalho, T.S.D.A.; de Santana Santos, T.; Pestana, E.M.; Souza, F.N.; Lage, V.M.G.B.; Nunesmaia, B.J.B.; Sena, P.T.S.; Mariano-Neto, E.; da Silva, E.M. Natural humic substances effects on the life history traits of Latonopsis australis SARS (1888) (Cladocera–Crustacea). Chemosphere 2015, 120, 165–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  59. Shehata, S.M.; Badawy, R.K.; Aboulsoud, Y.I.E. Phytoremediation of some heavy metals in contaminated soil. Bull. Natl. Res. Cent. 2019, 43, 189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Sajad, M.A.; Khan, M.S.; Bahadur, S.; Naeem, A.; Ali, H.; Batool, F.; Shuaib, M.; Batool, S. Evaluation of chromium phytoremediation potential of some plant species of Dir Lower, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. Acta Ecol. Sin. 2020, 40, 158–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Gopal, R.; Rizvi, A.H.; Nautiyal, N. Chromium alters iron nutrition and water relations of spinach. J. Plant Nutr. 2009, 32, 1551–1559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Vernay, P.; Gauthier-Moussard, C.; Hitmi, A. Interaction of bioaccumulation of heavy metal chromium with water rela-tion, mineral nutrition and photosynthesis in developed leaves of Lolium perenne L. Chemosphere 2007, 68, 1563–1575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Awalla, O. Phytoremediation of sewage sludge in soils contaminated with heavy metals. Glob. J. Environ. Sci. 2013, 12, 13–19. [Google Scholar]
  64. Shahid, M.; Rafiq, S.S.M.; Khalid, S.; Bibi, I.; Niazi, N.K.; Dumat, C.; Rashid, M.I. Chromium speciation, bioavailability, uptake, toxicity and detoxification in soil-plant system: A review. Chemosphere 2017, 178, 513–533. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Yen, T.-M. Culm height development, biomass accumulation and carbon storage in an initial growth stage for a fast-growing moso bamboo (Phyllostachy pubescens). Bot. Stud. 2016, 57, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  66. Srivastava, D.; Tiwari, M.; Dutta, P.; Singh, P.; Chawda, K.; Kumari, M.; Chakrabarty, D. Chromium Stress in Plants: Toxicity, Tolerance and Phytoremediation. Sustainability 2021, 13, 4629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mohanty, M.; Patra, H.K. Phytoassessment of in situ weed diversity for their chromium distribution pattern and ac-cumulation indices of abundant weeds at South Kaliapani chromite mining area with their phytoremediation prospective. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2020, 194, 110399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Toxics 09 00312 g002 550
Figure 2. MB growth with 1.64 mm/d tap water, Pots 1 and 2.
Figure 2. MB growth with 1.64 mm/d tap water, Pots 1 and 2.
Toxics 09 00312 g002
Toxics 09 00312 g003 550
Figure 3. MB growth with 4.93 mm/d tap water, Pots 3 and 4.
Figure 3. MB growth with 4.93 mm/d tap water, Pots 3 and 4.
Toxics 09 00312 g003
Toxics 09 00312 g004 550
Figure 4. MB tolerance: Growth with 1.64 mm/d contaminated water, Pots 1 and 2.
Figure 4. MB tolerance: Growth with 1.64 mm/d contaminated water, Pots 1 and 2.
Toxics 09 00312 g004
Toxics 09 00312 g005 550
Figure 5. MB tolerance: Growth with 4.93 mm/d contaminated water, Pots 3 and 4.
Figure 5. MB tolerance: Growth with 4.93 mm/d contaminated water, Pots 3 and 4.
Toxics 09 00312 g005
Toxics 09 00312 g006 550
Figure 6. MB phytoextraction: Growth with 1.64 mm/d contaminated water, Pot 1–Pot 2.
Figure 6. MB phytoextraction: Growth with 1.64 mm/d contaminated water, Pot 1–Pot 2.
Toxics 09 00312 g006
Toxics 09 00312 g007 550
Figure 7. MB phytoextraction: Growth with 4.93 mm/d contaminated water, Pot 3–Pot 4.
Figure 7. MB phytoextraction: Growth with 4.93 mm/d contaminated water, Pot 3–Pot 4.
Toxics 09 00312 g007
Toxics 09 00312 g008a 550Toxics 09 00312 g008b 550
Figure 8. Extraction of Cr expressed in milligrams (left) and as a percentage (right) accumulated in the different parts of MB, under 600 mm/y (a) 1800 mm/y (b) irrigation.
Figure 8. Extraction of Cr expressed in milligrams (left) and as a percentage (right) accumulated in the different parts of MB, under 600 mm/y (a) 1800 mm/y (b) irrigation.
Toxics 09 00312 g008aToxics 09 00312 g008b
Toxics 09 00312 g009a 550Toxics 09 00312 g009b 550
Figure 9. Absorbed milligrams of Cr per gram of biomass in a previous experiment [11] (a) and in the present experiment (b).
Figure 9. Absorbed milligrams of Cr per gram of biomass in a previous experiment [11] (a) and in the present experiment (b).
Toxics 09 00312 g009aToxics 09 00312 g009b
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ranieri, E.; D’Onghia, G.; Ranieri, F.; Petrella, A.; Spagnolo, V.; Ranieri, A.C. Phytoextraction of Cr(VI)-Contaminated Soil by Phyllostachys pubescens: A Case Study. Toxics 2021, 9, 312. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics9110312

AMA Style

Ranieri E, D’Onghia G, Ranieri F, Petrella A, Spagnolo V, Ranieri AC. Phytoextraction of Cr(VI)-Contaminated Soil by Phyllostachys pubescens: A Case Study. Toxics. 2021; 9(11):312. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics9110312

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ranieri, Ezio, Gianfranco D’Onghia, Francesca Ranieri, Andrea Petrella, Vincenzo Spagnolo, and Ada Cristina Ranieri. 2021. "Phytoextraction of Cr(VI)-Contaminated Soil by Phyllostachys pubescens: A Case Study" Toxics 9, no. 11: 312. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/toxics9110312

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop