Next Article in Journal
Differential Spatio-Temporal Regulation of T-Box Gene Expression by microRNAs during Cardiac Development
Previous Article in Journal
Role of the Epicardium in the Development of the Atrioventricular Valves and Its Relevance to the Pathogenesis of Myxomatous Valve Disease
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
JCDD
Volume 8
Issue 5
10.3390/jcdd8050055
jcdd-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Systematic Review

Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on QTc in Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

by
Angelos Arfaras-Melainis
1,*,
Andreas Tzoumas
2,
Damianos G. Kokkinidis
3,
Maria Salgado Guerrero
1,
Dimitrios Varrias
1,
Xiaobo Xu
1,
Luis Cerna
4,
Ricardo Avendano
3,
Cameron Kemal
5,
Leonidas Palaiodimos
1 and
Robert T. Faillace
1
1
Jacobi Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10461, USA
2
School of Medicine, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, 54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
3
Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale New Haven Hospital, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
4
Montefiore Medical Center, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY 10467, USA
5
Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2021, 8(5), 55; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcdd8050055
Submission received: 20 March 2021 / Revised: 25 April 2021 / Accepted: 8 May 2021 / Published: 13 May 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine with or without the concomitant use of azithromycin have been widely used to treat patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, based on early in vitro studies, despite their potential to prolong the QTc interval of patients. Objective: This is a systematic review and metanalysis designed to assess the effect of hydroxychloroquine with or without the addition of azithromycin on the QTc of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. Materials and methods: PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and MedRxiv databases were reviewed. A random effect model meta-analysis was used, and I-square was used to assess the heterogeneity. The prespecified endpoints were ΔQTc, QTc prolongation > 500 ms and ΔQTc > 60 ms. Results: A total of 18 studies and 7179 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. The use of hydroxychloroquine with or without the addition of azithromycin was associated with increased QTc when used as part of the management of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. The combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine plus azithromycin was also associated with statistically significant increases in QTc. Moreover, the use of hydroxychloroquine alone, azithromycin alone, or the combination of the two was associated with increased numbers of patients that developed QTc prolongation > 500 ms. Conclusion: This systematic review and metanalysis revealed that the use of hydroxychloroquine alone or in conjunction with azithromycin was linked to an increase in the QTc interval of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection that received these agents.

1. Introduction

Given the severity of the disease and paucity of safe and effective treatments for SARS-CoV-2 infection early in the course of the pandemic, physicians have resorted to drugs or compounds that have been used to treat other conditions in order to treat COVID-19 [1,2]. One of the first agents to be trialed and one that serves as the prime example of a repurposed agent with accelerated and widespread use is hydroxychloroquine [3]. It has been long used as an antimalarial and an immunosuppressive agent with a well-documented adverse event profile although cardiac toxicity is known to occur [1]. During the early stages of the pandemic, hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine, with or without the addition of azithromycin, were considered as potentially effective agents for patients with COVID-19 due to their antiviral and anti-inflammatory properties [4,5]. The interest in these agents arose from pre-clinical SARS-CoV-2 in vitro inhibition studies and small observational open-label randomized trials that demonstrated promise [2,6,7]. However, it is known that hydroxychloroquine, chloroquine and macrolide antibiotics may prolong repolarization as manifested as prolongation of the 12-lead ECG QT/QT corrected (QTc) interval [6,7]. Prolongation of the QTc interval can predispose patients to malignant ventricular arrhythmias including torsade de pointes [8,9]. In an effort to quantify the degree of QTc prolongation and the associated events of ventricular arrhythmias and torsade de pointes in patients with COVID-19 who were treated with hydroxychloroquine with and without azithromycin, multiple studies were published globally [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27]. Our objective with this study was to systematically review the available literature, examining the association between the use of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 and QTc prolongation, as well as the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias and torsade de pointes. We also aimed to quantitatively synthetize the above evidence with a meta-analysis in order to reach conclusions regarding the safety of hydroxychloroquine with or without azithromycin in this patient population in terms of QTc prolongation and potential ventricular pro-arrhythmic effects.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Literature Search and Inclusion Criteria

A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane and MedRxiv databases up to 31 July 2020. Two researchers (LP, AAM) independently searched the above-mentioned databases for potentially eligible studies. Whenever a disagreement occurred, a third investigator was involved (DGK) to reach a consensus. The following terms where used in different combinations to execute the literature search for our study: “hydroxychloroquine”, “chloroquine”, “plaquenil”, “QT”, “QT interval”, “QTc”, “QTc interval”, “arrhythmia”, “Torsades”, “Torsades de pointes”, “Torsade”, “Torsade de point”, “Covid”, “Covid-19”, “Covid19”, “Coronavirus”, “SARS-CoV-2”. Additionally, the investigators manually reviewed the reference lists of the included studies and previous reviews for additional potentially eligible articles. As prespecified inclusion criteria we used the following: (i) studies including patients hospitalized with COVID-19 that received at least one dose of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine; (ii) studies that provided QT/QTc measurements in association with the use of hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine in the aforementioned population; (iii) studies that reported quantitative data for at least one of the outcomes of interest; (iv) studies in the English language. The prespecified exclusion criteria used included: (i) studies including potential overlapping populations with other included studies in this analysis, in an effort to avoid counting the same patients twice. In the case of studies with duplicated populations, the study with the larger sample was included in our review and analysis.
The data supporting the findings of this study can be made available by the corresponding author upon reasonable request. This systematic review and meta-analysis was performed according to the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines [28].

2.2. Data Extraction and Outcomes

Two independent reviewers, mutually blinded (MS, AT), performed the data extraction from the selected studies to a prespecified form. If any disagreement occurred a third investigator (AAM) was involved to reach a consensus. Among the data extracted were the title of the study and the name of the first author, the month and year of publication, the city and country of the study, inclusion and exclusion criteria, patient numbers in the study and in each of the groups when applicable, baseline demographic characteristics, pertinent clinical characteristics and laboratory values, and outcomes of interest. The prespecified outcome was ΔQTc, QTc prolongation >500 ms that is commonly used as a cut-off in the literature as it is a well-known marker of high arrhythmic risk [29,30], and ΔQTc > 60 ms.

2.3. Risk of Bias Assessment

The risk of bias was assessed by two blinded, independent reviewers (LP, AT) using the Robins-I tool for nonrandomized studies [31,32]. The following domains were evaluated: confounding, selection of participants, departure from intended interventions, missing data, measurement of outcomes, and selective reporting. Discrepancies in quality assessment were resolved via consensus. The ROBVIS (Risk-Of-Bias VISualization) tool was utilized to graphically display the results [33], (Figure 1).

2.4. Statistical Synthesis and Analysis

Descriptive statistics are presented as means and standard deviations (SDs) for continuous variables and number of cases (n) and percentages (%) for dichotomous and categorical variables. The cumulative incidence of patients with a QTc > 500 ms and a ΔQTc > 60 ms as well as the 95% confidence intervals were estimated and synthesized for each of the four treatment groups. Odds ratios (ORs) with the corresponding 95% CIs were used to compare the proportion of patients who developed a QTc and a ΔQTc value over the above threshold between the four treatment groups. Pooled estimates of the weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated for outcomes describing continuous variables. The Higgins I-square (I2) statistic was used to assess heterogeneity among studies using a random effects model [34]. I2 > 75% indicated high heterogeneity [34]. Forest plots were used to graphically display the effect size in each study and the pooled estimates. A p < 0.05 was considered significant. The analyses were performed using STATA software (version 14.1; StataCorp College Station, TX, USA).

3. Results

3.1. Search Results

The literature search yielded 145 potentially relevant records after the duplicates had been removed. After screening the titles and abstracts, 103 studies were retrieved for full-text evaluation, and 18 studies [10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27] satisfied the predetermined search criteria and were included in the present meta-analysis as shown in the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) flow diagram (Figure 2).

3.2. Characteristics of Studies and Patients

Details about the included studies, including country of origin, number of patients and QTc correction formula used, are shown in Table 1. Detailed patient characteristics can be found in Table 2. The prevalence of baseline comorbidities such as hypertension, diabetes, coronary artery disease, obesity, heart failure, COPD/asthma, as well as the concomitant use of azithromycin and other QTc prolonging medications are also shown in Table 2.

3.3. Outcome Analysis

The mean QTc was increased in patients that received hydroxychloroquine alone (mean ΔQTc = 27.33 ms, SD: 50.05/mean max QTc = 472.57 ms, SD: 41.08), azithromycin alone (mean ΔQTc = 0.5 ms and SD: 40/mean max QTc = 464 ms, SD: 38, only one study), or the combination of the two (mean ΔQTc = 27.87 ms, SD: 36.230, mean max QTc = 467.50 ms, SD: 38.06). Moreover, the ΔQTc in patients that received hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin was found to be significantly increased compared to the ΔQTc of patients that received monotherapy with hydroxychloroquine alone (WMD = 16.06; 95% CI: 8.48, 23.65; I2 = 0.0%; p < 0.0001).
The rates of patients that developed QTc > 500 ms were N = 152/1089 (13.96%), N = 217/5036 (4.31%), N = 22/381(5.77%) and N = 5/493 (1.01%) for patients treated with hydroxychloroquine as monotherapy, azithromycin as monotherapy, the combination of hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin or none of the aforementioned agents, respectively. The analysis also revealed that the groups of patients that received hydroxychloroquine alone (OR: 9.94; 95%CI: 3.67, 26.98; I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.00) (Figure 3), azithromycin alone (OR: 5.15; 95%CI: 1.65, 16.06; I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.005) (Figure 4), or the combination of the two (OR: 8.73; 95%CI: 3.53, 21.56; I2 = 0.0%; p = 0.0) (Figure 5), were associated with higher risk for developing QTc > 500 ms, compared to the group of patients that did not receive any of these agents.
Lastly, the group of patients that received combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin were not found to be significantly more likely to develop ΔQTc > 60 ms compared to patients receiving hydroxychloroquine monotherapy (OR: 0.72;95% CI: 0.12, 4.29; I 2 = 67%; p = 0.722) (Figure 6), or azithromycin monotherapy (OR: 0.44; 95% CI: 0.16, 1.21; I 2 = 23.1%; p = 0.112) (Figure 7).

3.4. Risk of Bias Assessment

The outcomes of the Egger test were not consistent with publication bias. No evidence of publication bias was found for QTc > 500 ms when data from hydroxychloroquine monotherapy (p = 0.233), hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin combination (p = 0.199), or azithromycin monotherapy group (p = 0.376) were compared to the no treatment group.

4. Discussion

This study was a systematic review and metanalysis of the potential association between the use of hydroxychloroquine in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 patients and QTc prolongation. Our findings can be summarized as follows: (i) the QTc of patients that received hydroxychloroquine +/− azithromycin as part of their management for SARS-CoV-2 infection increased, (ii) combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine + azithromycin was associated with statistically significant increases in QTc, (iii) hydroxychloroquine alone, azithromycin alone, or the combination of the two was associated with increased number of patients that developed QTc prolongation > 500 ms.
Of note, hydroxychloroquine is currently no longer used for the treatment of patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection, however azithromycin is still recommended for the treatment of various infections. Our study also provides insight into the safety of using azithromycin as a monotherapy as well.
It is worth mentioning that the association between QTc prolongation and the development of clinically significant arrhythmias, including torsade de pointes, in this population is not well documented in the literature. In our systematic review, only a few events were reported in the included studies (Table 3). It is noteworthy, however, that based on real world data from the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine as treatments for malaria or autoimmune diseases, these agents have been proven to be largely safe [35,36]. Interestingly, when used for patients with COVID-19, their effect on the QTc was reported to be exaggerated, rendering these patients more prone to arrhythmias [37,38]. QTc prolongation is a manifestation of a delayed ventricular repolarization that occurs as certain medications block the hERG potassium channel (product of the gene KCNH2), and as a result, block the delayed rectifier potassium current (IKr) [39]. The degree of QTc prolongation from hydroxychloroquine and its proarrhythmic sequelae in patients with COVID-19 might differ from previous data for a few reasons, some of which are highlighted below.
Given the long half-life of hydroxychloroquine, it would follow that patients receiving it for chronic conditions such as autoimmune diseases should be at higher risk, given the higher cumulative dose they usually receive [8,36]. However, hospitalized patients with COVID-19, are older and with significantly more baseline comorbidities. Moreover, they possess several risk factors which have been shown in the literature, to place them at higher-than-usual risk of ventricular arrhythmias, including electrolyte abnormalities -very important especially potassium and magnesium-, hypoxia, concomitant use of other QT-prolonging medications, underlying cardiovascular disease [40,41] and AKI (acute kidney injury). AKI in particular, could potentially contribute to the accumulation of the drugs in higher than usual concentrations in this patient population [42] and was independently associated with QTc prolongation in one of the early studies by Chorin et al. [13]. Patients with COVID-19 often concomitantly received azithromycin and/or other QTc prolonging agents. For instance, in the study by Ramireddy and colleagues, 74 of a total of 98 patients enrolled in the study were receiving at least two drugs known to prolong the QTc, in addition to hydroxychloroquine [21].
In addition, it remains unknown if COVID-19 itself has either a direct or an indirect effect on the myocardial repolarization and thus the QTc. Mechanistically, SARS-Cov 2 has been hypothesized to potentially affect the potassium rectifier channel by either directly impairing its function leading to an increase in the QTc interval or by sensitizing this channel to the impairing effects of known channel blockers such as azithromycin [43] and hydroxychloroquine [44]. Basic science data imply that both hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin have QTc prolonging potential via alternate mechanisms in addition to their possible effect on the potassium rectifier channel [45,46].

5. Strengths and Limitations

Notable strengths of this study include a thorough and updated review of the available literature, a strict methodology, a detailed and robust analysis and a relatively large number of patients with EKG recording data. In more detail, patients from three different continents, all with high prevalence of COVID-19 and hydroxychloroquine use were included in the analysis.
One of the major limitations of our study is the decreased rate of reported QTc monitoring in patients with COVID-19 not receiving hydroxychloroquine, thus potentially underestimating the effect of the virus itself and overestimating the risk of arrhythmogenesis associated with hydroxychloroquine. Moreover, regarding the outcome ΔQTc > 60 ms, not enough of the included studies reported this outcome in a way that would allow for a more meaningful and direct comparison among the treatment groups, thus the effects of hydroxychloroquine with or without the addition of azithromycin could be underestimated by our results. The number of doses of hydroxychloroquine or azithromycin varied significantly among the included studies. Additionally, the timing of the ECG in regards to the dosing of the medications was not clarified in most studies, as well as the follow up period was either short or not clearly stated in some of the studies. All the above could potentially have prevented us from detecting the full extent of QTc prolongation and its sequelae including, torsades de pointes, and/or deadly arrhythmias, and/or ventricular arrhythmias, something that could drastically change the risk estimates in rare adverse effects as the aforementioned. Finally, this is a systematic review and metanalysis of primarily observational studies and thus carries the inherent limitations of the respective studies, including potential unaccounted confounders.

6. Conclusions

This systematic review and metanalysis revealed that the use of hydroxychloroquine alone or in conjunction with azithromycin was linked to an increase in the QTc interval of hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection that received these agents. The effects of this prolongation in respect to life-threatening arrhythmias and mortality was outside the scope of this study, thus further studies are needed to answer this clinically pressing question. While the limitations of our study are clear, we hope that the results of our study can add to the accumulating knowledge in the field of therapeutics for patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Funding

The authors have not received any kind of financial support for the research or publication of this manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have no potential conflict of interest regarding the research or publication of this manuscript.

References

  1. Colson, P.; Rolain, J.-M.; Lagier, J.-C.; Brouqui, P.; Raoult, D. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine as available weapons to fight COVID-2. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Gautret, P.; Lagier, J.-C.; Parola, P.; Hoang, V.T.; Maddeb, B.; Mailhe, M.; Doubier, B.; Courjon, J.; Giordanengo, V.; Vieira, V.E.; et al. Hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: Results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 56, 105949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Colson, P.; Rolain, J.M.; Raoult, D. Chloroquine for the 2019 novel coronavirus SARS-CoV. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Devaux, C.A.; Rolain, J.-M.; Colson, P.; Raoult, D. New insights on the antiviral effects of chloroquine against coronavirus: What to expect for COVID-19? Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Perricone, C.; Triggianese, P.; Bartoloni, E.; Cafaro, G.; Bonifacio, A.F.; Bursi, R.; Perricone, R.; Gerli, R. The anti-viral facet of anti-rheumatic drugs: Lessons from COVID-19. J. Autoimmun. 2020, 111, 102468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Kezerashvili, A.; Khattak, H.; Barsky, A.; Nazari, R.; Fisher, J.D. Azithromycin as a cause of QT-interval prolongation and torsade de pointes in the absence of other known precipitating factors. J. Interv. Card. Electrophysiol. 2007, 18, 243–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Morgan, N.D.; Patel, S.V.; Dvorkina, O. Suspected Hydroxychloroquine-Associated QT-Interval Prolongation in a Patient with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. JCR J. Clin. Rheumatol. 2013, 19, 286–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. White, N.J. Cardiotoxicity of antimalarial drugs. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2007, 7, 549–558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Mason, J.W. Antimicrobials and QT prolongation. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 2017, 72, 1272–1274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Bessière, F.; Roccia, H.; Delinière, A.; Charrière, R.; Chevalier, P.; Argaud, L.; Cour, M. Assessment of QT Intervals in a Case Series of Patients with Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Infection Treated with Hydroxychloroquine Alone or in Combination with Azithromycin in an Intensive Care Unit. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 1067–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Borba, M.G.S.; Val, F.F.A.; Sampaio, V.S.; Alexandre, M.M.A.; Melo, G.C.; Brito, M.; Mourano, M.P.G.; Brito-Sousa, J.D.; Baia-de-Silva, D.; Guera, M.V.F.; et al. Effect of High vs. Low Doses of Chloroquine Diphosphate as Adjunctive Therapy for Patients Hospitalized with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Infection: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw. Open 2020, 3, e208857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Cavalcanti, A.B.; Zampieri, F.G.; Rosa, R.G.; Azevedo, L.C.; Veiga, V.C.; Avezum, A.; Damiani, L.P.; Marcadenti, A.; Kawano-Dourado, L.; Lisboa, T.; et al. Hydroxychloroquine with or without Azithromycin in Mild-to-Moderate Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 383, 2041–2052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chorin, E.; Wadhwani, L.; Magnani, S.; Dai, M.; Shulman, E.; Nadeau-Routhier, C.; Knotts, R.; Bar-Cohen, R.; Kogan, E.; Barbhaiya, C.; et al. QT interval prolongation and torsade de pointes in patients with COVID-19 treated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin. Heart Rhythm 2020, 17, 1425–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Cipriani, A.; Zorzi, A.; Ceccato, D.; Capone, F.; Parolin, M.; Donato, F.; Fioretto, P.; Pesavento, R.; Previato, L.; Maffei, P.; et al. Arrhythmic profile and 24-hour QT interval variability in COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Int. J. Cardiol. 2020, 316, 280–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Enzmann, M.O.; Erickson, M.P.; Grindeland, C.J.; Lopez, S.M.C.; Hoover, S.E.; Leedahl, D.D. Treatment and preliminary outcomes of 150 acute care patients with COVID-19 in a rural health system in the Dakotas. Epidemiol. Infect. 2020, 148, e124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Kelly, M.; O’Connor, R.; Townsend, L.; Coghlan, M.; Relihan, E.; Moriarty, M.; Carr, B.; Melanophy, G.; Doyle, C.; Bannan, C.; et al. Clinical outcomes and adverse events in patients hospitalised with COVID-19, treated with off-label hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. Br. J. Clin. Pharmacol. 2021, 87, 1150–1154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lagier, J.-C.; Million, M.; Gautret, P.; Colson, P.; Cortaredona, S.; Giraud-Gatineau, A.; Honoré, S.; Gaubert, J.-Y.; Fournier, P.-E.; Tissot-Dupont, H.; et al. Outcomes of 3,737 COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine/azithromycin and other regimens in Marseille, France: A retrospective analysis. Travel Med. Infect. Dis. 2020, 36, 101791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Maraj, I.; Hummel, J.P.; Taoutel, R.; Chamoun, R.; Workman, V.; Li, C.; Tran, L.; DelVecchio, A.; Howes, C.; Akar, J.G. Incidence and determinants of QT interval prolongation in COVID-19 patients treated with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 2020, 31, 1904–1907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Mercuro, N.J.; Yen, C.F.; Shim, D.J.; Maher, T.R.; McCoy, C.M.; Zimetbaum, P.J.; Gold, H.S. Risk of QT Interval Prolongation Associated with Use of Hydroxychloroquine with or without Concomitant Azithromycin Among Hospitalized Patients Testing Positive for Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 1036–1041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Moschini, L.; Loffi, M.; Regazzoni, V.; Di Tano, G.; Gherbesi, E.; Battista Danzi, G. Effects on QT interval of hydroxychloroquine associated with ritonavir/darunavir or azithromycin in patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Heart Vessels 2020, 16, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Ramireddy, A.; Chugh, H.; Reinier, K.; Ebinger, J.; Park, E.; Thompson, M.; Cingolani, E.; Cheng, S.; Marban, E.; Albert, C.M.; et al. Experience with Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in the Coronavirus Disease 2019 Pandemic: Implications for QT Interval Monitoring. J. Am. Heart Assoc. 2020, 9, e017144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rosenberg, E.S.; Dufort, E.M.; Udo, T.; Wilberschied, L.A.; Kumar, J.; Tesoriero, J.; Weinberg, P.; Kirkwood, J.; Muse, A.; DeHovitz, J.; et al. Association of Treatment with Hydroxychloroquine or Azithromycin with In-Hospital Mortality in Patients With COVID-19 in New York State. JAMA 2020, 323, 2493–2502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Saleh, M.; Gabriels, J.; Chang, D.; Kim, B.S.; Mansoor, A.; Mahmood, E.; Makker, P.; Ismail, H.; Goldner, B.; Willner, J.; et al. Effect of Chloroquine, Hydroxychloroquine, and Azithromycin on the Corrected QT Interval in Patients with SARS-CoV-2 Infection. Circ. Arrhythmia Electrophysiol. 2020, 13, e008662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Samuel, S.; Friedman, R.A.; Sharma, C.; Ganigara, M.; Mitchell, E.; Schleien, C.; Blaufox, A.D. Incidence of arrhythmias and electrocardiographic abnormalities in symptomatic pediatric patients with PCR-positive SARS-CoV-2 infection, including drug-induced changes in the corrected QT interval. Heart Rhythm 2020, 17, 1960–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Sinkeler, F.S.; Berger, F.A.; Muntinga, H.J.; Jansen, M.M.P.M. The risk of QTc-interval prolongation in COVID-19 patients treated with chloroquine. Neth. Heart J. 2020, 28, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tuncer, T.; Karaci, M.; Boga, A.; Durmaz, H.; Guven, S. QT interval evaluation associated with the use of hydroxychloroquine with combined use of azithromycin among hospitalised children positive for coronavirus disease Cardiol. Young 2020, 30, 1482–1485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Broek, M.P.H.V.D.; Möhlmann, J.E.; Abeln, B.G.S.; Liebregts, M.; Van Dijk, V.F.; Van De Garde, E.M.W. Chloroquine-induced QTc prolongation in COVID-19 patients. Neth. Heart J. 2020, 28, 406–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moher, D.; Liberati, A.; Tetzlaff, J.; Altman, D.G. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann. Intern. Med. 2009, 151, 264–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  29. Helfenbein, E.D.; Zhou, S.H.; Lindauer, J.M.; Field, D.Q.; Gregg, R.E.; Wang, J.J.; Kresge, S.S.; Michaud, F.P. An algorithm for continuous real-time QT interval monitoring. J. Electrocardiol. 2006, 39, S123–S127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  30. Goldenberg, I.; Moss, A.J.; Peterson, D.R.; McNitt, S.; Zareba, W.; Andrews, M.L.; Robinson, J.L.; Locati, E.H.; Ackerman, M.J.; Benhorin, J.; et al. Risk Factors for Aborted Cardiac Arrest and Sudden Cardiac Death in Children with the Congenital Long-QT Syndrome. Circulation 2008, 117, 2184–2191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Sterne, J.A.C.; Sutton, A.J.; Ioannidis, J.P.A.; Terrin, N.; Jones, D.R.; Lau, J.; Carpenter, J.; Rücker, G.; Harbord, R.M.; Schmid, C.H.; et al. Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d4002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Higgins, J.P.T.; Altman, D.G.; Gøtzsche, P.C.; Jüni, P.; Moher, D.; Oxman, A.D.; Savović, J.; Schulz, K.F.; Weeks, L.; Sterne, J.A.C.; et al. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ 2011, 343, d5928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. McGuinness, L.A.; Higgins, J.P.T. Risk-of-bias VISualization (robvis): An R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res. Synth. Methods 2020, 12, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Higgins, J.P.T.; Thompson, S.G.; Deeks, J.J.; Altman, D.G. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003, 327, 557–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. Haeusler, I.L.; Chan, X.H.S.; Guérin, P.J.; White, N.J. The arrhythmogenic cardiotoxicity of the quinoline and structurally related antimalarial drugs: A systematic review. BMC Med. 2018, 16, 200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Jankelson, L.; Karam, G.; Becker, M.L.; Chinitz, L.A.; Tsai, M.-C. QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, and sudden death with short courses of chloroquine or hydroxychloroquine as used in COVID-19: A systematic review. Heart Rhythm 2020, 17, 1472–1479. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Driggin, E.; Madhavan, M.V.; Bikdeli, B.; Chuich, T.; Laracy, J.; Biondi-Zoccai, G.; Brown, T.S.; Der Nigoghossian, C.; Zidar, D.A.; Haythe, J.; et al. Cardiovascular Considerations for Patients, Health Care Workers, and Health Systems during the COVID-19 Pandemic. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 2020, 75, 2352–2371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lazzerini, P.E.; Boutjdir, M.; Capecchi, P.L. COVID-19, Arrhythmic Risk, and Inflammation: Mind the Gap! Circulation 2020, 142, 7–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Roden, D.M. Drug-Induced Prolongation of the QT Interval. N. Engl. J. Med. 2004, 350, 1013–1022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Roden, D.M.; Harrington, R.A.; Poppas, A.; Russo, A.M. Considerations for Drug Interactions on QTc in Exploratory COVID-19 (Coronavirus Disease 2019) Treatment. Circulation 2020, 141, e906–e907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  41. Bonow, R.O.; Hernandez, A.F.; Turakhia, M. Hydroxychloroquine, Coronavirus Disease 2019, and QT Prolongation. JAMA Cardiol. 2020, 5, 986–987. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Smit, C.; Peeters, M.Y.M.; van den Anker, J.N.; Knibbe, C.A.J. Chloroquine for SARS-CoV-2: Implications of Its Unique Pharmacokinetic and Safety Properties. Clin. Pharmacokinet. 2020, 59, 659–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Milberg, P.; Eckardt, L.; Bruns, H.-J.; Biertz, J.; Ramtin, S.; Reinsch, N.; Fleischer, D.; Kirchhof, P.; Fabritz, L.; Breithardt, G.; et al. Divergent Proarrhythmic Potential of Macrolide Antibiotics Despite Similar QT Prolongation: Fast Phase 3 Repolarization Prevents Early Afterdepolarizations and Torsade de Pointes. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 303, 218–225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rodríguez-Menchaca, A.A.; Navarro-Polanco, R.A.; Ferrer-Villada, T.; Rupp, J.; Sachse, F.B.; Tristani-Firouzi, M.; Sánchez-Chapula, J.A. The molecular basis of chloroquine block of the inward rectifier Kir2.1 channel. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 1364–1368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  45. Zhang, M.; Xie, M.; Li, S.; Gao, Y.; Xue, S.; Huang, H.; Chen, K.; Liu, F.; Chen, L. Electrophysiologic Studies on the Risks and Potential Mechanism Underlying the Proarrhythmic Nature of Azithromycin. Cardiovasc. Toxicol. 2017, 17, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Capel, R.A.; Herring, N.; Kalla, M.; Yavari, A.; Mirams, G.R.; Douglas, G.; Bub, G.; Channon, K.; Paterson, D.J.; Terrar, D.A.; et al. Hydroxychloroquine reduces heart rate by modulating the hyperpolarization-activated current If: Novel electrophysiological insights and therapeutic potential. Heart Rhythm 2015, 12, 2186–2194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Jcdd 08 00055 g001 550
Figure 1. Risk of bias assessment.
Figure 1. Risk of bias assessment.
Jcdd 08 00055 g001
Jcdd 08 00055 g002 550
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram.
Figure 2. PRISMA flow diagram.
Jcdd 08 00055 g002
Jcdd 08 00055 g003 550
Figure 3. Risk of developing QTc > 500 ms in patients that received hydroxychloroquine monotherapy.
Figure 3. Risk of developing QTc > 500 ms in patients that received hydroxychloroquine monotherapy.
Jcdd 08 00055 g003
Jcdd 08 00055 g004 550
Figure 4. Risk of developing QTc > 500 ms in patients that received azithromycin monotherapy.
Figure 4. Risk of developing QTc > 500 ms in patients that received azithromycin monotherapy.
Jcdd 08 00055 g004
Jcdd 08 00055 g005 550
Figure 5. Risk of developing QTc > 500 ms in patients that received combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.
Figure 5. Risk of developing QTc > 500 ms in patients that received combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin.
Jcdd 08 00055 g005
Jcdd 08 00055 g006 550
Figure 6. Risk of developing ΔQTc > 60 ms in patients that received combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin vs. hydroxychloroquine monotherapy.
Figure 6. Risk of developing ΔQTc > 60 ms in patients that received combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin vs. hydroxychloroquine monotherapy.
Jcdd 08 00055 g006
Jcdd 08 00055 g007 550
Figure 7. Risk of developing ΔQTc > 60 ms in patients that received combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin vs. azithromycin monotherapy.
Figure 7. Risk of developing ΔQTc > 60 ms in patients that received combination therapy with hydroxychloroquine and azithromycin vs. azithromycin monotherapy.
Jcdd 08 00055 g007
Table
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.
Table 1. Characteristics of included studies.
StudyRegion/CountryMonth, YearStudy DesignQTc FormulaTotal N of ptsHQ/CQ Alone, N of ptsHQ/CQ + AZ, N of ptsAZ Alone, N of ptsNo Treatment,
N of pts
Van den BroekUtrecht, NetherlandsApril, 2020R OBSBazett9595000
SinkelerTilburg and Amersfoort, NetherlandsJuly, 2020R OBS
(2 centers)		Postema and Wilde method397397000
MercuroMassachusetts, USAMay 2020R OBSBazett90375300
Saleh3 hospitals within Northwell Health System, NY, USAApril 2020P OBSBazett1917211900
BessiereLyon, FranceMay 2020R OBSBazett40182200
EnzmannFargo, ND, USAJune 2020R OBSNR7596600
TuncerIstanbul, Turkey (pediatric only)June 2020R OBSBazett2121900
MoschiniCremona, ItalyJuly 2020R OBSBazett113615200
BorbaManaus, BrazilApril 2020P single-centerFridericia8108100
ChorinNY, USA (NYU Langone Health); Milan, ItalyMay 2020R OBSBazett251025100
MarajNew Haven, USAMay 2020R OBSBazett9109100
CiprianiPadua, ItalyMay 2020R OBSBazett and Fridericia
(if HR > 100)		2202200
RamireddyCalifornia, USAMay 2020R OBSBazett and Fridericia981061270`
KellyDublin, IrelandJuly 2020R OBSNR134082052
SamuelNY, USA (Cohen Children’s Medical Center, pediatric only)July 2020R OBSBazett36169011
LagierMarseille, FranceJune 2020R OBSBazett37371013337137162
RosenbergNYC, Nassau County, Suffolk County, Westchester County, USAMay 2020R multicenter OBSNR1438271735211221
CavalcantiBrazilJuly 2020P multicenter OBS *NR26989116658
Abbreviations: R: retrospective, P: prospective, OBS: observational, N of pts: number of patients, QTc: corrected QT, NY: New York, NR: not reported. * Data were retrieved exclusively from an as treated analysis of the safety population of the non-blinded trial (NCT04322123), only for those patients with available electrocardiographic data, without randomized selection and adjusting for missing data.
Table
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients per included study.
Table 2. Baseline characteristics of patients per included study.
StudyN of Participants (Total)AgeMale n (%)BMIDiabetes n (%)HTN
n (%)		CAD
n (%)		CHF
n (%)		Asthma/COPD
n (%)		CKD II-IV or ESRD
n (%)		Other QTc Prolonging Agents
n (%)
Van den Broek956563 (66)NRNRNR11 (12)9 (11)NRNRNR
Sinkeler39767.8 (12.5)262 (66)28.5 (5.6)NRNR32 (8)32 (8)NR116 (29.2)106 (27)
Mercuro9060.1 (16.7)46 (51.1)31.5 (6.6)26 (28.9)48 (53.3)10 (11.1)9 (10.0)18 (20.0)NR90 (100)
Saleh19158.6 (9.1)115 (60.2)28.2 (2.8)65 (32.3)121 (60.2)23 (11.4)15 (7.9)30 (15.7)10 (5.2)81 (42.4)
Bessiere4066.7 (11.9)32 (80)28.7 (5.9)16 (40)23 (57.5)NRNRNRNR20 (50)
Enzmann755643 (57.3)NR22 (28.7)NRNR8 (10.7)22 (29.3)4 (5.3)NR
Tuncer2114.169 (42.8)23.7NRNRNRNR2 (9.5) 0 (0)
Moschini11367.7 (9.6)85 (75)NR16 (14)32 (28)NRNR4 (3.5)6 (5.3)61 (53.9)
Borba8151.1 (13.9)61 (75.3)28.6 (6.4)14(25.5)25 * (45.5)NRNRNRNR81 (100)
Chorin25164.3 (20)188 (75)NR67 (27)135 (54)30 (12)8 (3)18 (7)28 (11.1)73 (29)
Maraj9162.7 (15.1)51 (66)NR26 (29)42 (46)13 (14)NR6 (7)25 (27.4)38 (42)
Cipriani2263.3 (10.37)18 (82)28.3 (4.4)6 (27)12 (55)NRNR1 (5)1 (5)0 (0)
Ramireddy9862.3 (17)60 (61)27.8 (6.6)22 (22)59 (60)NR20 (20.4)25 (26)14 (14.3)74 (75.5)
Kelly13466.0451 (38)NRNRNRNRNRNRNR3 (2.2)
Samuel3612.6 (6)20 (55.5)NRNR0 (0)0 (0)NR3 (8)NR2 (5.5)
Lagier373745.3 (16.8)1704 (45.6)NR312 (8.3)561 (15)NRNR338 (11)NR45 (1.2)
Rosenberg1438NR858 (59.7)NR504 (35)816 (56.7)173 (12)96 (6.6)259 (18)NRNR
Cavalcanti26950.3 (14.6)157 (58.3)NR51 (18.9)104 (38.7)11 (12)4 (1.5)21
(7.8)		2 (0.7)NR
Abbreviations: N, n: number of patients, BMI: basic metabolic index, HTN: hypertension, CAD: coronary artery disease, CHF: congestive heart failure, COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, CKD: chronic kidney disease, ESRD: end stage renal disease, NR: not reported, QTc: corrected QT. * out of 55 patients with available data.
Table
Table 3. Incidence of arrhythmias and torsades de point reported by the included studies.
Table 3. Incidence of arrhythmias and torsades de point reported by the included studies.
StudyTorsades De Point n (%)Ventricular Arrhythmia n (%)
Van den Broek0 (0)0 (0)
SinkelerNR1 (0.2)
Mercuro1 (11)NR
Saleh0 (0)7 (3.7) (non-sustained)
1 (0.5) (sustained)
Bessiere0 (0)0 (0)
EnzmannNR14 (18.7)
Tuncer0 (0)0 (0)
Moschini1 (11)2 (1.8)
BorbaNRNR
Chorin1 (0.4)NR
Maraj1 (11)2 (2)
CiprianiNRNR
Ramireddy0 (0)NR
KellyNRNR
Samuel0 (0)6 (16.7)
Lagier0 (0)NR
RosenbergNRNR
CavalcantiNRNR
Abbreviations: NR: not reported.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Arfaras-Melainis, A.; Tzoumas, A.; Kokkinidis, D.G.; Salgado Guerrero, M.; Varrias, D.; Xu, X.; Cerna, L.; Avendano, R.; Kemal, C.; Palaiodimos, L.; et al. Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on QTc in Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Cardiovasc. Dev. Dis. 2021, 8, 55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcdd8050055

AMA Style

Arfaras-Melainis A, Tzoumas A, Kokkinidis DG, Salgado Guerrero M, Varrias D, Xu X, Cerna L, Avendano R, Kemal C, Palaiodimos L, et al. Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on QTc in Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease. 2021; 8(5):55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcdd8050055

Chicago/Turabian Style

Arfaras-Melainis, Angelos, Andreas Tzoumas, Damianos G. Kokkinidis, Maria Salgado Guerrero, Dimitrios Varrias, Xiaobo Xu, Luis Cerna, Ricardo Avendano, Cameron Kemal, Leonidas Palaiodimos, and et al. 2021. "Effect of Hydroxychloroquine on QTc in Patients Diagnosed with COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis" Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease 8, no. 5: 55. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcdd8050055

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop