Next Article in Journal
Key Figure Based Incoming Inspection of Lithium-Ion Battery Cells
Previous Article in Journal
The Effect of Input Parameter Variation on the Accuracy of a Vanadium Redox Flow Battery Simulation Model
Previous Article in Special Issue
Lightweight Polymer-Carbon Composite Current Collector for Lithium-Ion Batteries
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Editorial

Lithium-Ion Batteries: Latest Advances and Prospects

Department of Chemical Engineering, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA
Submission received: 15 January 2021 / Accepted: 19 January 2021 / Published: 20 January 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Lithium-Ion Batteries: Latest Advances and Prospects)
The anthropogenic release of greenhouse gases, especially carbon dioxide (CO2), has resulted in a notable climate change and an increase in global average temperature since the mid-20th century [1,2]. To arrive at the margin of a 2 °C global temperature rise, it is essential to design and execute a multiscale comprehensive action plan to effectively mitigate climate change before its impacts overwhelm our ability to manage the situation [3,4,5]. Electrochemistry is a powerful tool for designing diverse CO2 mitigation approaches that can effectively help prevent dangerous anthropogenic interference with the climate system. Several implementations of electrochemical systems are being considered within the electrochemistry and climate change framework. Besides emerging tasks such as CO2 capture [6,7,8] and conversion [9,10,11], electrochemical systems are mainly being developed to help integrate renewable energy into electricity systems, through developing electrochemical energy storage systems such as batteries. Batteries are currently being developed to power an increasingly wide range of applications, including electrification of transportation [12,13] and grid-scale energy storage [14,15]. Large-scale developments and implementations of batteries offer sustainable energy supply based on renewables, which is a major step toward reducing CO2 emissions associated with the energy sector and ultimately assisting in climate change mitigation.
Among the developed batteries, lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) have received the most attention, and have become increasingly important in recent years. Compared with other batteries, LIBs offer high energy density, high discharge power, high coulombic efficiencies, and long service life [16,17,18]. These characteristics have facilitated a remarkable advance of LIBs in many frontiers, including electric vehicles, portable and flexible electronics, and stationary applications. Since the field of LIBs is advancing rapidly and attracting an increasing number of researchers, it is necessary to often provide the community with the latest updates. Therefore, this Special Issue was designed to focus on updating the electrochemical community with the latest advances and prospects on various aspects of LIBs. Researchers were invited to submit their original research as well as review/perspective articles for publication in the Special Issue “Lithium-Ion Batteries: Latest Advances and Prospects”.
In response to this call, twelve research papers [19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30] and one case report [31] were thoroughly peer-reviewed and published. The published research papers covered advances in several fronts of the technology, including detailed fundamental studies of the electrochemical cell and investigations to better improve parameters related to battery packs. In the domain of fundamental studies, various components of the electrochemical cell, including electrodes and electrolyte, were investigated. In this context, a lightweight dense polymer–carbon composite-based current collector foil for applications in LIB was developed and evaluated in comparison to the state-of-the-art aluminum foil collector [19]. It was found that the resistance of the developed electrode based on this current collector to be by a factor of five lower compared to the aluminum-based collector, which was attributed to the low contact resistance between the proposed current collector and the other elements of the electrode. In addition, due to a 50% lower material density, the developed lightweight current collector offers the possibility to significantly decrease the mass loading of the electrode, which can be of special interest for bipolar battery architectures. In another study [20], the lithium intercalation dynamics in a cathode electrode with particles of distributed size was studied using the phase-field model, aiming to better understand the effect of this particle size distribution on the LIBs’ dynamic performance.
To advance the electrolyte-related research, a first principle-based modeling framework was developed to identify the physical manifestation that electrolyte degradation has on the battery and the response observed in the terminal voltage [21]. The developed framework relates the different kinds of side reactions in the electrolyte to the material properties affected due to these side reactions—these material property changes directly impact the electrochemical reactions, and ultimately the voltage across the terminals of the battery.
Internal resistance is one of the important parameters in LIBs, which requires developing precise experimental procedures and/or theoretical frameworks to accurately evaluate this parameter. In this context, two different methods were investigated in the research paper published in this Special Issue: electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) and parameter estimation based on equivalent circuit model (ECM) [22]. It was found that unlike the conventional parameter estimation method that yields a different value than EIS, internal resistances estimated based on ECM match the values obtained from EIS. The proposed methods will be supplementary in tracking the internal resistance properly which can improve the accuracy of battery performance prediction.
An experimental investigation was performed to evaluate the effect of the current rate and prior cycling on the coulombic efficiency of LIBs [23]. The determination of coulombic efficiency of LIBs can contribute to comprehend better their degradation behavior. Therefore, a detailed understanding of the effect of these parameters would be beneficial to further optimize the cell charge/discharge procedures.
Experiments were performed at high temperatures to provide better insights regarding battery performance at elevated temperatures. In this context, advanced in-operando measurement techniques such as fast impedance spectroscopy and ultrasonic waves as well as strain-gauges were employed to evaluate the cell performance at these temperatures [24]. These methods have the potential to be integrated into the battery management system in the future, making it possible to achieve higher battery safety even under the most demanding operating conditions. In addition, comprehensive hazard analysis of failing LIBs used in electric vehicles was evaluated experimentally at elevated temperatures [25]. In this investigation, several hazard-relevant parameters were quantified, including the temperature response of the cell, the maximum reached cell surface temperature, the amount of produced vent gas, the gas venting rate, the composition of the produced gases, and the size and composition of the produced particles. The results are valuable for all who deal with batteries, including firefighters, battery pack designers, and cell recyclers.
The effect of cell manufacturing parameters was also investigated on the performance of the produced LIBs. For example, a theoretical framework was developed to highlight the considerable impact of electrode porosity, electrode internal void volume, cell capacity, and capacity ratio that result from electrode coating and calendering tolerance (as the manufacturing parameters) on the cell-to-cell and lot-to-lot performance variation [26]. In another study published in this Special Issue, the impact of manufacturing parameters in laser cutting, which is a promising technology for the singulation of conventional and advanced electrodes for LIBs, was investigated [27]. In specifics, it was shown how cutting edge characteristics affect electrochemical performance. These types of information would be beneficial to manufacture better LIBs.
In addition to improving individual LIB cells, several researches were focused on strategies to obtain better battery packs. Every single cell in the battery pack needs a contact for its cell terminals, which raises the necessity of an automated contacting process with low joint resistances to reduce the energy loss in the cell transitions. A capable joining process suitable for highly electrically conductive materials like copper or aluminum is laser beam welding. In the research paper published in this Special Issue, a theoretical examination of the joint resistance and a simulation of the current flow dependent on the contacting weld’s position in an overlap configuration was performed [28]. This investigation highlighted the influence of the shape and position of the weld seams as well as the laser welding parameters, and how these parameters can be leveraged to further reduce the cell-to-cell joint resistances.
For LIB packs, it is necessary to understand how to best replace poorly performing cells to extend the lifetime of the entire battery pack. In a comprehensive investigation [29], cell replacement strategies were studied considering two scenarios: early life failure, where one cell in a pack fails prematurely, and building a pack from used cells for less demanding applications. Early life failure replacement found that a new cell can perform adequately within a pack of moderately aged cells. The second scenario for the reuse of lithium-ion battery packs examines the problem of assembling a pack for less-demanding applications from a set of aged cells, which exhibit more variation in capacity and impedance than their new counterparts. The cells used in the aging comparison part of the study were deeply discharged, recovered, assembled in a new pack, and cycled. The criteria for selecting the aged cells for building a secondary pack were discussed in the paper and the performance and coulombic efficiency of the secondary pack were compared to the pack built from new cells and the repaired pack. The results showed that the pack that employed aged cells performed well, but its efficiency was reduced.
The cooling system of LIB packs used in electric vehicles was also investigated in the Special Issue. Thermal management systems of LIBs play an important role as the performance and lifespan of the batteries are affected by the temperature. A detailed study published in this Special Issue proposed a framework to establish equivalent circuit models that can reproduce the multi-physics phenomenon of Li-ion battery packs, which includes liquid cooling systems with a unified method. The developed equivalent circuit models were found to be very accurate and computationally cost-effective [30].
Besides the detailed research papers, one case report on the future portable LIB recycling challenges in Poland was published in this Special Issue [31]. This case report presents the market of portable LIBs in the European Union (EU) with particular emphasis on the stream of used cells in Poland by 2030. The report also draws attention to the fact that, despite a decade of efforts in Poland, it has not been possible to create an effective management system for waste batteries and accumulators that would include waste management, waste disposal, and component recovery technology for reuse. This report highlights the critical role of recycling strategies and challenges that need to be investigated to effectively deal with used LIBs.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Acknowledgments

At the end of this editorial, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to the authors for their valuable contributions, and the reviewers for their efforts in analyzing the relevance and quality of the papers that were submitted to this special issue. I would also like to thank the editorial staff of Batteries for their help and support during the review process.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Rogelj, J.; Huppmann, D.; Krey, V.; Riahi, K.; Clarke, L.; Gidden, M.; Nicholls, Z.; Meinshausen, M. A new scenario logic for the Paris Agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 2019, 573, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Luderer, G.; Vrontisi, Z.; Bertram, C.; Edelenbosch, O.Y.; Pietzcker, R.C.; Rogelj, J.; De Boer, H.S.; Drouet, L.; Emmerling, J.; Fricko, O. Residual fossil CO2 emissions in 1.5–2 C pathways. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2018, 8, 626–633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. O’Neill, B.C.; Carter, T.R.; Ebi, K.; Harrison, P.A.; Kemp-Benedict, E.; Kok, K.; Kriegler, E.; Preston, B.L.; Riahi, K.; Sillmann, J. Achievements and needs for the climate change scenario framework. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2020, 10, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Fawzy, S.; Osman, A.I.; Doran, J.; Rooney, D.W. Strategies for mitigation of climate change: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2020, 18, 1–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rahimi, M. Public Awareness: What Climate Change Scientists Should Consider. Sustainability 2020, 12, 8369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Rahimi, M.; Catalini, G.; Hariharan, S.; Wang, M.; Puccini, M.; Hatton, T.A. Carbon Dioxide Capture Using an Electrochemically Driven Proton Concentration Process. Cell Rep. Phys. Sci. 2020, 1, 100033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rahimi, M.; Diederichsen, K.M.; Ozbek, N.; Wang, M.; Choi, W.; Hatton, T.A. An Electrochemically Mediated Amine Regeneration Process with a Mixed Absorbent for Postcombustion CO2 Capture. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 8999–9007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rahimi, M.; Zucchelli, F.; Puccini, M.; Hatton, T.A. Improved CO2 Capture Performance of Electrochemically Mediated Amine Regeneration Processes with Ionic Surfactant Additives. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2020, 3, 10823–10830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zheng, Y.; Vasileff, A.; Zhou, X.; Jiao, Y.; Jaroniec, M.; Qiao, S.-Z. Understanding the roadmap for electrochemical reduction of CO2 to multi-carbon oxygenates and hydrocarbons on copper-based catalysts. J. Am. Chem. Soci. 2019, 141, 7646–7659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Lee, G.; Li, Y.C.; Kim, J.-Y.; Peng, T.; Nam, D.-H.; Rasouli, A.S.; Li, F.; Luo, M.; Ip, A.H.; Joo, Y.-C. Electrochemical upgrade of CO2 from amine capture solution. Nat. Energy 2020, 6, 46–53. [Google Scholar]
  11. Sun, Z.; Ma, T.; Tao, H.; Fan, Q.; Han, B. Fundamentals and challenges of electrochemical CO2 reduction using two-dimensional materials. Chem 2017, 3, 560–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cano, Z.P.; Banham, D.; Ye, S.; Hintennach, A.; Lu, J.; Fowler, M.; Chen, Z. Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets. Nat. Energy 2018, 3, 279–289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Harper, G.; Sommerville, R.; Kendrick, E.; Driscoll, L.; Slater, P.; Stolkin, R.; Walton, A.; Christensen, P.; Heidrich, O.; Lambert, S. Recycling lithium-ion batteries from electric vehicles. Nature 2019, 575, 75–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Posada, J.O.G.; Rennie, A.J.; Villar, S.P.; Martins, V.L.; Marinaccio, J.; Barnes, A.; Glover, C.F.; Worsley, D.A.; Hall, P.J. Aqueous batteries as grid scale energy storage solutions. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 1174–1182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Jiang, L.; Lu, Y.; Zhao, C.; Liu, L.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Shen, X.; Zhao, J.; Yu, X.; Li, H. Building aqueous K-ion batteries for energy storage. Nat. Energy 2019, 4, 495–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Manthiram, A.; Yu, X.; Wang, S. Lithium battery chemistries enabled by solid-state electrolytes. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2017, 2, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Manthiram, A. A reflection on lithium-ion battery cathode chemistry. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xiao, J.; Li, Q.; Bi, Y.; Cai, M.; Dunn, B.; Glossmann, T.; Liu, J.; Osaka, T.; Sugiura, R.; Wu, B. Understanding and applying coulombic efficiency in lithium metal batteries. Nat. Energy 2020, 5, 561–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Fritsch, M.; Coeler, M.; Kunz, K.; Krause, B.; Marcinkowski, P.; Pötschke, P.; Wolter, M.; Michaelis, A. Lightweight Polymer-Carbon Composite Current Collector for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2020, 6, 60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. L’vov, P.; Sibatov, R. Effect of the Particle Size Distribution on the Cahn-Hilliard Dynamics in a Cathode of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2020, 6, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Balagopal, B.; Chow, M.-Y. The Physical Manifestation of Side Reactions in the Electrolyte of Lithium-Ion Batteries and Its Impact on the Terminal Voltage Response. Batteries 2020, 6, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Islam, S.; Park, S.-Y.; Balasingam, B. Unification of Internal Resistance Estimation Methods for Li-Ion Batteries Using Hysteresis-Free Equivalent Circuit Models. Batteries 2020, 6, 32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Madani, S.S.; Schaltz, E.; Knudsen Kær, S. Effect of Current Rate and Prior Cycling on the Coulombic Efficiency of a Lithium-Ion Battery. Batteries 2019, 5, 57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Zappen, H.; Fuchs, G.; Gitis, A.; Sauer, D.U. In-Operando Impedance Spectroscopy and Ultrasonic Measurements during High-Temperature Abuse Experiments on Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2020, 6, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Essl, C.; Golubkov, A.W.; Gasser, E.; Nachtnebel, M.; Zankel, A.; Ewert, E.; Fuchs, A. Comprehensive Hazard Analysis of Failing Automotive Lithium-Ion Batteries in Overtemperature Experiments. Batteries 2020, 6, 30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yourey, W. Theoretical Impact of Manufacturing Tolerance on Lithium-Ion Electrode and Cell Physical Properties. Batteries 2020, 6, 23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Jansen, T.; Kandula, M.W.; Hartwig, S.; Hoffmann, L.; Haselrieder, W.; Dilger, K. Influence of Laser-Generated Cutting Edges on the Electrical Performance of Large Lithium-Ion Pouch Cells. Batteries 2019, 5, 73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Hollatz, S.; Kremer, S.; Ünlübayir, C.; Sauer, D.U.; Olowinsky, A.; Gillner, A. Electrical Modelling and Investigation of Laser Beam Welded Joints for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Batteries 2020, 6, 24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Nenadic, N.G.; Trabold, T.A.; Thurston, M.G. Cell Replacement Strategies for Lithium Ion Battery Packs. Batteries 2020, 6, 39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yamanaka, T.; Kihara, D.; Takagishi, Y.; Yamaue, T. Multi-physics equivalent circuit models for a cooling system of a lithium ion battery pack. Batteries 2020, 6, 44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sobianowska-Turek, A.; Urbańska, W. Future Portable Li-Ion Cells’ Recycling Challenges in Poland. Batteries 2019, 5, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahimi, M. Lithium-Ion Batteries: Latest Advances and Prospects. Batteries 2021, 7, 8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/batteries7010008

AMA Style

Rahimi M. Lithium-Ion Batteries: Latest Advances and Prospects. Batteries. 2021; 7(1):8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/batteries7010008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahimi, Mohammad. 2021. "Lithium-Ion Batteries: Latest Advances and Prospects" Batteries 7, no. 1: 8. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/batteries7010008

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop