Next Article in Journal
‘Back-and-Forth Stomach’ CT Imaging Findings of a Pathophysiologic Entity Causing Acute Gastric Volvulus
Previous Article in Journal
MDCT Imaging of Non-Traumatic Thoracic Aortic Emergencies and Its Impact on Diagnosis and Management—A Reappraisal
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Tomography
Volume 8
Issue 1
10.3390/tomography8010018
tomography-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling and Segmented Brain Volumetry in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Frontotemporal Dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment

by
Dominique Cornelius Marterstock
1,*,
Michael Franz Xaver Knott
1,
Philip Hoelter
1,
Stefan Lang
1,
Timo Oberstein
2,
Johannes Kornhuber
2,
Arnd Doerfler
1 and
Manuel A. Schmidt
1
1
Department of Neuroradiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
2
Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Schwabachanlage 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Tomography 2022, 8(1), 229-244; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/tomography8010018
Submission received: 16 December 2021 / Revised: 12 January 2022 / Accepted: 13 January 2022 / Published: 17 January 2022
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Background: Previous studies suggest that brain atrophy can not only be defined by its morphological extent, but also by the cerebral blood flow (CBF) within a certain area of the brain, including white and gray matter. The aim of this study is to investigate known atrophy patterns in different forms of dementia and to compare segmented brain volumetrics and pulsed arterial spin labeling (pASL) data to explore the correlation between brain maps with atrophy and this non-contrast-enhanced brain-perfusion method. Methods: Our study comprised 17 patients with diagnosed cognitive impairment (five Alzheimer’s disease = AD, five frontotemporal dementia = FTD, seven mild cognitive impairment = MCI) and 19 healthy control subjects (CO). All patients and controls underwent 4D-pASL brain-perfusion MR imaging and T1w MPRAGE. The data were assessed regarding relative brain volume on the basis of 286 brain regions, and absolute and relative cerebral blood flow (CBF/rCBF) were derived from pASL data in the corresponding brain regions. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) was performed to assess cognitive functions. Results: FTD patients demonstrated significant brain atrophy in 43 brain regions compared to CO. Patients with MCI showed significant brain atrophy in 18 brain regions compared to CO, whereas AD patients only showed six brain regions with significant brain atrophy compared to CO. There was good correlation of brain atrophy and pASL perfusion data in five brain regions of patients with diagnosed FTD, especially in the superior temporal gyrus (r = 0.900, p = 0.037), the inferior frontal white matter (pars orbitalis; r = 0.968, p = 0.007) and the thalami (r = 0.810, p = 0.015). Patients with MCI demonstrated a correlation in one brain region (left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus; r = 0.786, p = 0.036), whereas patients with diagnosed AD revealed no correlation. Conclusions: pASL can detect affected brain regions in cognitive impairment and corresponds with brain atrophy, especially for patients suffering from FTD and MCI. However, there was no correlation of perfusion alterations and brain atrophy in AD. pASL perfusion might thus represent a promising tool for noninvasive brain-perfusion evaluation in specific dementia subtypes as a complimentary imaging-based bio marker in addition to brain volumetry.

1. Introduction

Dementia is an overall definition of conditions and brain diseases causing a long-term and often steady decline in cognitive abilities and memory, which are severe enough to impair daily life functioning, often including emotional, social and behavioral deficits. The understanding of the biological mechanisms for developing dementia in the human nervous system is as yet widely incomplete.
There are a variety of biomarkers used for attempting to diagnose different forms of dementia and more sensitive monitoring of progression, even at an early stage of onset. In particular, Alzheimer’s disease (AD)—the most common cause of dementia (~70%)—and frontotemporal dementia (FTD) are well-examined conditions. Examples for biomarkers are cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers such as total tau, phosphorylated tau, and β-amyloid1–42 [1], or genetical biomarkers such as the APOE-ε4 allele as one of the strongest non-Mendelian genetic risk factors [2] for AD. Similarly, various gene mutations for the FTD spectrum are known. Correlatively, structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can reveal circumscribed atrophy patterns of brain lobes. Reduced cerebral blood flow (CBF) seems to be associated with neurodegenerative progression due to reduced brain metabolism; however, it is not yet clear which one precedes the other. Therefore, CBF could be a surrogate marker of brain function (neurovascular coupling) [3].
Accordingly, arterial spin labeling (ASL), a relatively new method for analyzing brain perfusion and regional CBF, alongside dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion or single photon emission computed tomography, has been suggested as an uprising biomarker to possibly detect early onset of dementia [4], which warrants regular consideration in the clinical setting. As opposed to other perfusion techniques, ASL is a completely noninvasive procedure without the demand for contrast agent or costly radioactive tracers. ASL scans are comparably short (approx. 4 min) and can be accomplished during the same examination of structural MRI, providing for an even more accurate diagnosis of the structure–function relationship [4]. Furthermore, MRI is easy to access and less expensive than other procedures, e.g., fluorodeoxyglucose (18F)– positron emission tomography (FDG-PET).
In this study, we compare morphological and functional MR neuroimaging of patients suffering from clinically diagnosed FTD, AD and MCI to determine regions of significant brain atrophy and correlating CBF and/or relative CBF (rCBF) via pulsed ASL (pASL). Unlike prior studies, data were divided into much smaller sections of brain regions by a comprehensive set of pre-defined brain structures including gray and white matter (286 regions) via an automated online application tool to give more detailed insight.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

We examined seventeen subjects with different forms of cognitive impairment and nineteen control subjects, which altogether were recruited from the University Hospital Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany (i.e., psychiatric and neuroradiologic department at the University Hospital Erlangen, Bavaria, Germany). All participants provided written informed consent according to procedures approved by institutional review boards and the ethic-commission of Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) (231_12 Az; EudraCT: 2012-001583-29). The examination was performed at the Neuroradiology, University Hospital Erlangen. Five patients were clinically diagnosed with AD, five patients with FTD and seven patients with MCI. (For full demographic features, see Table 1).

2.2. Procedures

Clinical examination as well as structural and pASL-MRI scans were performed. The subjects underwent medical evaluation by psychiatrists comprising medical history, physical and neurologic examination, and neuropsychological testing. General cognitive ability was assessed by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

2.3. Structural MRI Acquisition

Imaging was performed on a 3 Tesla MR system (Siemens Trio Tim System, Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany), in a standardized supine position using a 12-Channel Head Coil (Siemens Healthineers, Erlangen, Germany). Structural MRI included following sequences: 3D FLASH MRI along 3 orthogonal directions to obtain scout views of the brain for initial positioning of MRI slices (voxel size: 1.6 × 1.6 × 1.6 mm, matrix size = 160 × 160, total acquisition time: 17 s); sagittal volumetric T1-weighted gradient echo MRI (MPRAGE) of the entire brain, TR/TE/TI = 1900/2.52/900 ms, 9° flip angle sequence with a spatially isotropic resolution of 1.0 mm3 (matrix size = 256 × 256, total acquisition time: 4:26 min); sagittal single slab 3D turbo spin echo sequence with slab selective, variable excitation pulse to obtain proton density and T2-weighted MRIs, TR/TE/TI = 5000/388/1800 ms, 176 contiguous slices (1 mm) covering the entire brain with a spatially isotropic resolution of 1.0 mm3 (matrix size = 256 × 259, total acquisition time 6:27 min); axial diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) with TR/TE = 3800/91 ms, a slice thickness of 5 mm, FOV = 230 mm (voxel size: 1.2 × 1.2 × 5.0 mm, matrix size = 192 × 192, total acquisition time 1:21 min); axial 3D fast low-angle gradient-echo sequence (SWIMR), TR/TE = 28/20 ms, FOV = 230 mm, slice thickness of 2 mm with a spatially anisotropic resolution of 0.7 × 0.6 × 2.0 mm (matrix size = 384 × 353, total acquisition time 5:26 min). To rule out intra- and extracranial stenosis, which could compromise arterial spin labeling technique we performed intra- and extracranial angiography and contrast-enhanced brain perfusion. Angiography MRI included: 3D time-of-flight MRA spoiled gradient echo (TOF) of the circulus arteriosus cerebri with TR/TE = 22/3.98 ms, 15° flip angle sequence with FOV = 220 mm, slice thickness/slice oversampling = 0.7 mm/25%, and bandwidth = 181 Hz/Px (voxel size: 0.7 × 0.4 × 0.7 mm, matrix size = 512 × 307, total acquisition time 5:37 min); contrast-enhanced MRA with a weight-adapted dose of Gadobutrol (Gadovist®, Bayer Healthcare, Leverkusen, Germany), 0.1 mL/kg) injected at a rate of 3 mL/s, TR/TE 43.46/1.56 ms, 25° flip angle, bandwidth 400 Hz/Px, 90 measurements (voxel size: 0.7 × 0.4 × 0.7 mm, matrix size = 256 × 179, total acquisition time 1:30 min); dynamic susceptibility contrast (DSC) MR perfusion with a second weight-adapted dose of Gadobutrol (0.1 mL/kg) injected at a rate of 5 mL/s, a T2* echo planar imaging (EPI) gradient recalled-echo sequence was used, TR/TE = 1840/32 ms, 90° flip angle, bandwidth 1346 Hz/Px, slice thickness = 6 mm, 19 sections (matrix size = 128 × 128, total acquisition time 1:39 min); postcontrast structural MRI included the following sequences: postcontrast axial T1 fast low-angle shot (FLASH) sequence with TR/TE = 309/4.92 ms, 90° flip angle (voxel size 0.5 × 0.5 × 5.0 mm, matrix size = 448 × 448, total acquisition time 2:41 min); postcontrast axial T1 volumetric interpolated brain examination (VIBE) 7 sequence with TR/TE = 3.93/1.5 ms, 9° flip angle (voxel size = 0.9 × 0.9 × 2.0 mm, matrix size = 320 × 320, total acquisition time 2:44 min).

2.4. pASL-Perfusion Image Acquisition

ASL was performed using a quantitative pulsed ASL technique called Proximal Inversion with Control of Off-Resonance Effects, or PICORE, before the administration of the contrast agent. We acquired asymmetric multi-slice pASL-MRI sequences with a slice-selective 90° pulse and spoiler gradient to initially saturate magnetization in the imaged slice. A wide inversion slab was then applied proximally using a 180° adiabatic RF pulse that inverts inflowing spins. The control sequence repeated the 90° spoiler saturation of static tissue in the imaged slice with nonselective off-resonance inversion pulse that is applied at the same frequency offset relative to the imaging slice as the tag, but in the absence of a slab-selective gradient (actual imaging parameters were as follows: TR 2500 ms, TE 11 ms, TI1 = 700 ms, saturation stop time = 1600 ms, TI2 = 1800 ms, flow limit = 100.0 cm/sec, field of view 192 mm, covering 14 slices with slice thickness 6 mm, gap = 1.5 mm, distance factor 25%, 101 measurements, matrix size = 64 × 64 and total acquisition time 4:22 min).

2.5. Brain Volumetry Analysis

Volumetric data of segmented brain regions were obtained by using an online application called Brain Geodesic Positioning System—BrainGPS (AnatomyWorks, LLC, Baltimore, MD, USA)—to process brain MRI images and define various brain regions automatically [5]. It is based on an advanced multiple-atlas algorithm. Acquired T1w-MPRAGE-DICOM data were converted to 4D analyze format (with .hdr/.img file extension) by Dcm2analyze to eliminate personal information. They were then uploaded to the application and submitted to obtain a 286-label segmentation of the T1w-MPRAGE scan for ROI information (T1-MultiAtlas) using the XSEDE Computational Anatomy Science Gateway. The results included segmentation of 286 regions as well as summary statistics of the structures. Three different types of volume reports are provided in this analysis at different granularity levels: raw volumes (mm3) in the native patient coordinates, normalized brain size (tissue, ventricles and sulci as the denominator), and linear normalization to the MNI space [6]. For volumetry statistics, the normalized brain size at granularity Level 5 (Tree Type I) [7] was used. T1 MultiAtlas results were additionally managed, inspected, and stored in a novel 3D database system called BrainKnowledge (AnatomyWorks, LLC, Baltimore, MD, USA) to visualize all examined regions of interest in the MNI space (see Figure 1).

2.6. pASL Perfusion Data Analysis

Acquired pASL-DICOM data were also converted to 4D analyze. The converted data were uploaded simultaneously with the T1 MultiAtlas of each subject and submitted for processing and ROI analysis. Several default parameters for CBF quantification, such as blood T1, brain/blood partition coefficient, and labeling efficiency were assumed by this processing and not modified [8]. Output data included absolute CBF map in native ASL space, rCBF map in native ASL space with CBF values relative to the whole brain CBF average, a text file that contains motion vectors from realignment, a text file that contains the information of the dataset for reference, CBF and rCBF maps in MPRAGE space, CBF and rCBF maps in standard MNI space, segmented brain image in MPRAGE space, a text file that contains CBF values in the ROIs, and a brain mask that shows hypo- and hyperperfusion regions.

2.7. Statistical Analysis

Statistical analysis was performed using IBM SPSS Statistics (version 19.0.0.1; IBM SPSS-Software, Ehningen, Germany). An independent t-test was used to calculate significant brain atrophy in any of the processed 286 brain regions by comparing quantitative values of the brain volumes of subjects with the same diagnosed cognitive impairment against the control group. Significance level was defined as p < 0.05. Normal distribution was tested using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test. The assumption of homogeneity of variance was tested using Levene’s test of equality of variances. We informally accounted for multiple comparisons as previously suggested [9]. For brain regions demonstrating significant atrophy, the bivariate correlations procedure was used to compute Pearson’s correlation coefficient, Spearman’s rho, and Kendall’s tau-b with their significance levels for brain volumetry (mm3), CBF (mL/100 g/min), and rCBF (mL/100 g/min) to identify linear correlation. The significance level was defined as p < 0.05 (two sided).

3. Results

3.1. Results of Brain Regions with Significant Atrophy

Patients diagnosed with FTD demonstrated significant brain atrophy in 43 brain regions (of a total of 286) compared to the CO group. As anticipated, there was significant atrophy for frontotemporal brain regions such as the right middle fronto-orbital gyrus (MFOG), the left and right inferior frontal gyrus pars orbitalis (IFGO), the left and right middle frontal gyrus (dorsal prefrontal cortex) (MFG-DPFC), the left and right gyrus rectus (RG), the left and right inferior frontal white matter of the pars orbitalis (IFWMO), the left and right superior temporal gyrus (STG), the left middle temporal gyrus (MTG), the left and right amygdala, and the left hippocampus. Additionally, there was a significantly reduced volume in the left and right external capsule (EC) and the left and right thalamus (for full results, see Table 2 and Figure 2).
MCI patients showed significant brain atrophy in 18 brain regions. There was particularly high significance for the left and right STG, the right lateral fronto-orbital white matter (LFOWM), and the left rostral anterior cingulate white matter (rostralWMACC) (for full results, see Table 3 and Figure 3).
Patients diagnosed with AD presented six brain regions with significant atrophy. Understandably, there was especially high significance for hippocampal brain regions, such as the right hippocampus and the right hippocampal cingulum (CGH). A reduced volume of the right middle temporal white matter (MTWM) was measured (for full results, see Table 4).

3.2. Results of Statistical Correlation between Brain-Volume and pASL

There was good correlation of brain atrophy with reduced pASL perfusion data in five brain regions of patients with diagnosed FTD. Patients indicating signs of MCI demonstrated correlation in one brain region, while patients with diagnosed AD revealed no good correlation.

3.2.1. Patients with FTD

Of the 43 brain regions, five displayed good linear correlation of significant brain atrophy and a reduced CBF—in two cases, additionally rCBF—of the pASL data. The significant results for FTD patients can be summarized as follows:
We observed a good positive correlation between brain volume and CBF/rCBF for the left STG (Spearman’s rho = 0.900, p = 0.037). The right IFWMO demonstrated very good correlation between CBF and volume (Pearson = 0.968, p = 0.007; Spearman’s rho = 0.900, p = 0.037). After having excluded one patient with negative pASL values, the merged observation of both thalami showed good positive correlation of CBF/rCBF data with brain volume (CBF: Pearson = 0.810, p = 0.015; Spearman’s rho = 0.810, p = 0.015; Kendall Tau-b = 0.643, p = 0.026; rCBF: Pearson = 0.722, p = 0.043). Ultimately, there was good positive linear correlation between volume and CBF for the right EC (Spearman’s rho = 0.900, p = 0.037). For exemplary imagery, see Figure 4.

3.2.2. Patients with MCI

Of the 18 brain regions, one displayed a good positive linear correlation between significant brain atrophy and a reduced rCBF of the pASL data. The left inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFO) demonstrated a good correlation between rCBF and brain volume (Spearman-Rho = 0.786, p = 0.036).

3.2.3. Patients with AD

Of the six volume-reduced brain segments, none demonstrated a good positive linear correlation of significant brain atrophy and reduced CBF or rCBF of the pASL data.

4. Discussion

Prior studies suggest that certain atrophy patterns accompany hypoperfusion for different kinds of dementia, e.g., the prefrontal cortex, precuneus and hippocampal lobes in AD [10], and the thalami and reasonably the frontotemporal lobes in FTD [11]. Consequently, further reviews indicate, for example, hippocampal atrophy as a risk factor for progression to dementia in patients suffering from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) [12]—a prodromal state of AD. Sets of atrophy patterns might help to differentiate between different kinds of dementias, which sometimes are not easily diagnosed due to overlapping symptoms. For example, AD accounts for ~30% of cases presenting with a clinical diagnosis of primary progressive aphasia (PPA) or behavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) [13]. Accuracy of discrimination at an early or even asymptomatic state of dementia could support appropriate initial target-oriented medical care, e.g., medication with acetylcholinesterase inhibitors.
We found a good correlation of formerly described atrophy patterns for FTD, MCI, and AD compared to CO. Consistently with the pathophysiology of FTD, we found significant brain atrophy in the frontotemporal brain structures of patients with FTD (MFG-DPFC, IFGO, MFOG, RG, and STG) since frontotemporal lobar degeneration involves the deterioration of neurons in the gray matter of the frontotemporal lobes [14]. Volume reduction in IFG and STG—being classic language areas (Broca’s and Wernicke’s area)—is of great significance for FTD, especially in non-fluent-variant primary progressive aphasia (nfvPPA) and semantic-variant primary progressive aphasia (svPPA). Atrophy in the mesial temporal lobe is commonly seen in FTD patients [15]; in more detail, we could confirm amygdalar atrophy, which has been neuropathologically identified before [16]. The amygdala executes primary roles in the accumulation and formation of memories related to emotional events [17]; therefore, volume reduction of the amygdala might interfere with memory recall that is strengthened by emotion. Hippocampal atrophy is not solely specific for FTD and is rather pathognomonic for AD [18], which makes hippocampal atrophy per se an uncertain imaging biomarker for FTD. As stated in prior studies, we can verify significant atrophy of the thalamus, which is a well-examined characteristic for the whole FTD spectrum [11,19]. Thalamic as well as amygdalar atrophy in turn suggest a loss of cortical projection fibers, which might explain the reduced volume of the caudate tail, putamen, and globus pallidus—all of them connected to the thalamus via axonal pathways.
Striatal degeneration in patients with FTD has been well demonstrated [20], explicitly with the putamen being associated with reinforcement learning and motor control, including articulation and speech [21]. Complementing these results, we found significant volume loss of the substantia nigra as an integral component of the basal ganglia circuitry for motor and limbic functions. Degeneration of the basal ganglia is a well-known aspect of neurodegenerative diseases, which might explain the progressive development of motor deficits in FTD patients, including parkinsonism and motor neuron diseases [15]. A number of studies found subcortical involvement in FTD patients confirming these findings [22,23]. Hence, it is not surprising that we also found significant white matter-atrophy in the corona radiatia, cerebral peduncles, ECs and frontal brain regions (IFWMO, IFO), which contain descending (motor) nerve tracts and association fibers among others, alluding to an axonal degeneration as a consequence or as a precursor of (sub)cortical atrophy.
MCI represents a preclinical transitional stage between healthy aging and dementia. Hypoperfusion and hypometabolism in the temporoparietal cortex and mesial temporal lobe atrophy, particularly in the rhinal cortex, have been described [24,25]. This explains our findings of atrophy in the right hippocampus and parahippocampal gyrus. Additionally, we found significant atrophy in the MTG and STG. Maybe due to the connection of the anterior cingulate with the hippocampus, there is significant adjacent white matter atrophy (subcallosalWM-ACC, rostralWM-ACC) [26]. Since there is no verified atrophy in other associated cortical structures to these white matter fibers, this could support the theory that hippocampal atrophy is a precursor leading to white matter degeneration of the corresponding axons. There are studies stating that anterior cingulate cortex disruptions can be found in AD and MCI patients [27,28]. High-level functions for the ACC such as focused problem solving and error recognition have been described [26], which might be unrecognized in the diagnosis of MCI. Our finding of atrophy in the left IFO seems complex. The inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus contains fibers that connect the frontal lobe with the posterior part of the parietal and temporal lobes. In the temporal lobe, the inferior occipitofrontal fasciculus is associated with the inferior longitudinal fasciculus, which interconnects the occipital cortex (lingula, cuneus, and lateral surface) with the cortex of the superior, middle and inferior temporal (and possibly the hippocampal) gyri. This complex pathway of connections may account for a degeneration of associated fibers to the hippocampus and temporal gyri in the IFO. Defects in the IFO can cause visual hallucinations and global aphasia, and there is also evidence that trauma to the IFO can cause amnesia and cognitive impairment [29,30]. Additionally, we found atrophy of the left mammillary body, which in turn can be present in AD [31]—MCI being a prodromal state of AD. Previous studies have found the mammillary bodies to be structurally connected to memory function, partially linked to the hippocampus via pathways, which explains cognitive deficits in patients with Wernicke–Korsakoff syndrome [32].
Numerous studies have convincingly documented hippocampal atrophy as well as atrophy of temporal brain regions (STG, MTWM) for patients diagnosed with AD in comparison to aging controls [33], which we can reproduce. Volume reduction in the cingulum (CGH) could be a consequence or precursor, as it is connected to the hippocampal formation (e.g., subiculum) via projection fibers [34]. Our findings of adjacent white matter atrophy in our MCI cohort insinuate that atrophy in the cingulum could be consequential; however, we cannot reproduce significant atrophy in subcallosal WM-ACC or rostral WM-ACC for AD patients, which makes this a rather questionable conclusion. As expected, and in contrast to FTD patients, we could not find significant proof of striatal atrophy [35], except for the left caudate tail. The caudate tail is not well examined, although a prior study has suggested that there is especially relevant atrophy in the left caudate head and body for AD patients compared to CO, yet seems to be more present in the FTD spectrum [36]. This in turn suggests striatal degeneration to be a good diagnostic biomarker for FTD [36,37]. Atrophy of SOG is rarely described and might be present in patients suffering from atypical AD. As these patients do not primarily present with memory impairment but atypical symptoms, e.g., in the fields of language or vision [38], posterior cortical atrophy seems to play an important role. However, we did not observe significant atrophy of parietal lobe structures such as the precuneus, which has been described for (a)typical and early-onset AD patients [39]. Contrary to former studies, we found that the right hemisphere seems to be more affected by the disease than the left one in our AD cohort, although left–right asymmetry, especially of the hippocampus, receives less research attention [40].
A strength of this study is the fine segmentation for pASL perfusion data into 286 brain regions. FTD naturally shows frontotemporal patterns of hypoperfusion, which we could reproduce by a good positive correlation of volume and cerebral blood flow (STG, IFWMO) [41]. To the best of our knowledge, there are no other studies confirming reduced perfusion rates in atrophied thalami and the right EC in FTD patients so far. Thalamic atrophy, as discussed above, is a well-examined subject matter for FTD patients, so it is not surprising that we found reduced pASL perfusion rates. Loss of white matter microstructural integrity of the EC in FTD has been measured via DTI previously [42]. The clinical benefit of this particular finding, however, remains doubtful. On the one hand, our findings of a rather low correlation between volume and perfusion overall supports studies which have doubted the beneficial use of ASL in comparison to FDG-PET in the diagnosis of FTD [43,44]. On the other hand, there are studies confirming a good correlation of ASL perfusion with FDG-PET [41,45]. These conflicting findings could be best explained by the heterogeneity of relatively small sample populations and differing ASL techniques [46]. Our finding of a good correlation for volume loss in the IFO in MCI patients has not yet been discussed. Again, the clinical importance of this finding remains unclear, although degeneration or defects in the IFO (as described above) could produce severe symptoms. The fact that we did not find good correlation in the AD spectrum could be due to the lower sample size in that subgroup, as well as their mild clinical symptoms. Lastly, there is discussion around if atrophied brain regions may demonstrate paradox hypermetabolism and hyperperfusion as a last “distress call”, especially in patients with MCI and AD [47].
As stated, our present study may be limited due to its small sample of participants, which might explain why we only found relatively few correlations of reduced CBF/rCBF with volume loss. Furthermore, there was no differentiation between subtypes of the FTD, MCI, and AD spectrum. Most of our AD patients were mildly affected (MMSE > 21) [48,49,50], which could explain the lack of a good correlation of hypoperfusion with atrophied brain regions, as well as the lack of atrophy in the parietal lobes. However, our results are in line with the formerly described atrophy patterns of other brain regions, the hippocampus being one of the earliest sites of pathological involvement, even in mild AD [34]. Image acquisition of pASL data in the elderly is sometimes difficult, as lacking cooperation and compliance during an MRI examination of cognitively impaired patients might lead to reduced image quality by motion artifacts. Yet, motion artifacts can be ruled out for structural MRI.
There are hints that cerebral hypoperfusion precedes neurodegeneration in large population-based studies [51]. It has been suggested that lower perfusion is often attributed to neurodegeneration and can indicate neuronal dysfunction and synaptic failure. The first signs of neurodegeneration are likely to occur years before the diagnosis of dementia, and cerebral perfusion may consequently fall well before clinical symptoms of dementia arise. Unfortunately, we cannot deliver any answers to the question of whether reduced blood flow in certain brain regions leads to a decline in brain volume, or vice versa, volume loss and reduced metabolism leading to a downgrading of the need for blood supply. This would need longitudinal studies and was not the main subject matter of this study.
The aim of our study was to compare brain perfusion patterns regarding hypoperfusion with sophisticated brain volumetric data regarding atrophy. We found significant correlations of brain areas affected by hypoperfusion and atrophy. Thus, our results support the idea that brain perfusion evaluation by pASL and volumetric assessment of brain parenchyma can deliver complimentary MR imaging-based biomarkers in early detection and follow-up of dementia. To the best of our knowledge there are no studies confirming ASL hypoperfusion in atrophied thalami of the FTD spectrum so far, which should be subject to further investigation. Clinically, pASL can easily be established in routine MRI procedures and would not involve intravenous administration of contrast agent or radiopharmaceuticals, which not only preserves multimorbid patients (e.g., severe kidney failure) but also comes in at a lower cost than, for example, SPECT brain perfusion, which is often used instead.
It has been suggested that atrophic patterns are not necessarily coherent with hypoperfusion patterns, hinting at varying pathological mechanisms in the development of dementia disorders [52]. This in turn gives rise to the question of if combined patterns of pASL and volumetry could be a more precise MR imaging-based biomarker to differentiate between different forms of dementia. For this purpose, further studies are needed. Moreover, prospective ultra-high-field (e.g., 7 Tesla MRI) imaging studies may give more detailed insight into atrophy and perfusion changes of the brain in elderly and cognitively impaired patients.

5. Conclusions

pASL can detect affected brain regions in cognitive impairment and corresponds with brain atrophy, especially for patients suffering from FTD and MCI. However, there was no correlation of perfusion alterations and brain atrophy in AD. This supports the theory that pASL could provide complimentary imaging biomarkers for identifying affected brain regions in addition to brain volumetry in specific dementia subtypes—particularly in patients with FTD and MCI—maybe even at an early stage of disease.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; methodology, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; software, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; validation, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; formal analysis, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; investigation, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; resources, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; data curation, D.C.M., M.A.S., A.D., M.F.X.K., P.H., S.L., J.K. and T.O.; writing—original draft preparation, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; writing—review and editing, D.C.M., M.A.S., A.D., M.F.X.K., P.H., S.L., J.K. and T.O.; visualization, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; supervision, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D.; project administration, D.C.M., M.A.S. and A.D. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU) (protocol code: 231_12 Az; 2012-001583-29, date of approval: 2 July 2012).

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The present work was performed in (partial) fulfillment of the requirements for obtaining the degree “Dr. med.” by Dominique Cornelius Marterstock at Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU). We acknowledge financial support by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft and Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg within the funding programme “Open Access Publication Funding”.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

ACRanterior corona radiata
ADAlzheimer’s disease
AGangular gyrus
ASLarterial spin labeling
bvFTDbehavioral-variant frontotemporal dementia
CBFcerebral blood flow
CGHhippocampal cingulum
CIclaustrum complex
CPcerebral peduncle
ECexternal capsule
FDG-PETfluorodeoxyglucose (18F)– positron emission tomography
FTDfrontotemporal dementia
GPglobus pallidus
ICPinferior cerebellar peduncle
IFGOpars orbitalis of the inferior frontal gyrus
IFOinferior fronto-occipital fasciculus
IFWMOpars orbitalis of the inferior frontal white matter
LFOWMwhiter matter of the lateral fronto-orbital gyrus
Mammillarymammillary body
MCImild cognitive impairment
MFG-DPFCmiddle frontal gyrus (dorsal prefrontal cortex)
MFOGmiddle fronto-orbital gyrus
MMSEMini-Mental State Examination
MRImagnetic resonance imaging
MTGmiddle temporal gyrus
MTG-polepole of the middle temporal gyrus
MTWMwhite matter of the middle temporal gyrus
nfvPPAnon-fluent variant primary progressive aphasia
NucAccumbensNucleus accumbens
pASLpulsed arterial spin labeling
PCRposterior corona radiata
PHGparahippocampal gyrus
PPAprimary progressive aphasia
rCBFrelative cerebral blood flow
RGgyrus rectus
RGWMwhite matter of the gyrus rectus
rostralWM-ACCwhite matter of the rostral anterior cingulate gyrus
SCPsuperior cerebellar peduncle
SCRSFG-polesuperior corona radiatapole of the superior frontal gyrus
Snigrasubstantia nigra
SOGsuperior occipital gyrus
SSsagittal stratum (includes inferior longitudinal fasciculus and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus)
STGsuperior temporal gyrus
STG-polepole of the superior temporal gyrus
STWMwhite matter of the superior temporal gyrus
subcallosalWM-ACCwhite matter of the subcallosal anterior cingulate gyrus
svPPAsemantic-variant primary progressive aphasia

References

  1. Blennow, K.; Hampel, H.; Weiner, M.W.; Zetterberg, H. Cerebrospinal fluid and plasma biomarkers in Alzheimer disease. Nat. Rev. Neurol. 2010, 6, 131–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Riphagen, J.M.; Ramakers, I.H.; Freeze, W.M.; Pagen, L.H.; Hanseeuw, B.J.; Verbeek, M.M.; Verhey, F.R.; Jacobs, H. Linking APOE-ε4, blood-brain barrier dysfunction, and inflammation to Alzheimer’s pathology. Neurobiol. Aging 2020, 85, 96–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Zhang, N.; Gordon, M.L.; Goldberg, T.E. Cerebral blood flow measured by arterial spin labeling MRI at resting state in normal aging and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2017, 72, 168–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wolk, D.A.; Detre, J.A. Arterial spin labeling MRI: An Emerging Biomarker for Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Neuro-degenerative Conditionsv. Curr. Opin. Neurol. 2012, 25, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Li, Y.; Liu, P.; Li, Y.; Fan, H.; Su, P.; Peng, S.-L.; Park, D.C.; Rodrigue, K.M.; Jiang, H.; Faria, A.V.; et al. ASL-MRICloud: Towards a comprehensive online tool for ASL data analysis. NMR Biomed. 2018, 32, e4051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mori, S.; Kolasny, A.; Center for Imaging Science, Laboratory for Brain Anatomical MRI, Center for Brain Imaging, AnatomyWorks, LLC. Available online: https://braingps.mricloud.org/docs/tutorials/download_results/reports_to_use.html (accessed on 21 November 2021).
  7. Mori, S.; Kolasny, A.; Center for Imaging Science, Laboratory for Brain Anatomical MRI, Center for Brain Imaging, Anatomy Works, LLC. Available online: https://braingps.mricloud.org/docs/tutorials/download_results/granularity_levels.html (accessed on 21 November 2021).
  8. Alsop, D.C.; Detre, J.A.; Golay, X.; Günther, M.; Hendrikse, J.; Hernandez-Garcia, L.; Lu, H.; MacIntosh, B.; Parkes, L.M.; Smits, M.; et al. Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn. Reson. Med. 2015, 73, 102–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Rothman, K.J. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology 1990, 1, 43–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Chao, L.L.; Buckley, S.T.; Kornak, J.; Schuff, N.; Madison, C.; Yaffe, K.; Miller, B.L.; Kramer, J.H.; Weiner, M.W. ASL Perfusion MRI Predicts Cognitive Decline and Conversion From MCI to Dementia. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2010, 24, 19–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Bocchetta, M.; Gordon, E.; Cardoso, M.J.; Modat, M.; Ourselin, S.; Warren, J.D.; Rohrer, J.D. Thalamic atrophy in frontotemporal dementia—Not just a C9orf72 problem. NeuroImage Clin. 2018, 18, 675–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Grundman, M.; Sencakova, D.; Jack, C.R.; Petersen, R.C.; Kim, H.T.; Schultz, A.; Weiner, M.F.; De Carli, C.; DeKosky, S.T.; van Dyck, C.; et al. Brain MRI hippocampal volume and prediction of clinical status in a mild cognitive impairment trial. J. Mol. Neurosci. 2002, 19, 23–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Alladi, S.; Xuereb, J.; Bak, T.; Nestor, P.; Knibb, J.; Patterson, K.; Hodges, J.R. Focal cortical presentations of Alzheimer’s disease. Brain 2007, 130, 2636–2645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Rosen, H.J.; Gorno–Tempini, M.L.; Goldman, W.P.; Perry, R.J.; Schuff, N.; Weiner, M.; Feiwell, R.; Kramer, J.H.; Miller, B.L. Patterns of brain atrophy in frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. Neurology 2002, 58, 198–208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Bang, J.; Spina, S.; Miller, B.L. Frontotemporal dementia. Lancet 2015, 386, 1672–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Mann, D.M.A.; South, P.W. The topographic distribution of brain atrophy in frontal lobe dementia. Acta Neuropathol. 1993, 85, 334–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Carlson, N.R. Physiology of Behavior; Pearson: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2012; p. 364. ISBN 978-0205239399. [Google Scholar]
  18. Galton, C.J.; Gomez-Anson, B.; Antoun, N.; Scheltens, P.; Patterson, K.; Graves, M.; Sahakian, B.J.; Hodges, J.R. Temporal lobe rating scale: Application to Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2001, 70, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Lee, S.E.; Khazenzon, A.M.; Trujilo, A.J.; Guo, C.C.; Yokoyama, J.S.; Sha, S.J.; Takada, L.T.; Karydas, A.M.; Block, N.R.; Coppola, G.; et al. Altered network connectivity in frontotemporal dementia with C9orf72 hexanucleotide repeat expansion. Brain 2014, 137, 3047–3060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Halabi, C.; Halabi, A.; Dean, D.L.; Wang, P.-N.; Boxer, A.L.; Trojanowski, J.Q.; DeArmond, S.J.; Miller, B.L.; Kramer, J.H.; Seeley, W.W. Patterns of Striatal Degeneration in Frontotemporal Dementia. Alzheimer Dis. Assoc. Disord. 2013, 27, 74–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  21. Viñas-Guasch, N.; Wu, Y.J. The role of the putamen in language: A meta-analytic connectivity modeling study. Brain Struct. Funct. 2017, 222, 3991–4004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bede, P.; Omer, T.; Finegan, E.; Chipika, R.H.; Iyer, P.M.; Doherty, M.; Vajda, A.; Pender, N.; McLaughlin, R.; Hutchinson, S.; et al. Connectivity-based characterisation of subcortical grey matter pathology in frontotemporal dementia and ALS: A multimodal neuroimaging study. Brain Imaging Behav. 2018, 12, 1696–1707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Domínguez-Vivero, C.; Wu, L.; Lee, S.; Manoochehri, M.; Cines, S.; Brickman, A.M.; Rizvi, B.; Chesebro, A.; Gazes, Y.; Fallon, E.; et al. Structural Brain Changes in Pre-Clinical FTD MAPT Mutation Carriers. J. Alzheimers Dis. 2020, 75, 595–606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Fennema-Notestine, C.; McEvoy, L.K.; Hagler, D.J.; Jacobson, M.W.; Dale, A.M.; The Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative. Structural neuroimaging in the detection and prognosis of pre-clinical and early AD. Behav. Neurol. 2009, 21, 3–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Anderson, N.D. State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CNS Spectr. 2019, 24, 78–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Allman, J.M.; Hakeem, A.; Erwin, J.M.; Nimchinsky, E.; Hof, P. The Anterior Cingulate Cortex. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2001, 935, 107–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Cera, N.; Esposito, R.; Cieri, F.; Tartaro, A. Altered Cingulate Cortex Functional Connectivity in Normal Aging and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Front. Neurosci. 2019, 13, 857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Huang, C.; Wahlund, L.-O.; Svensson, L.; Winblad, B.; Julin, P. Cingulate cortex hypoperfusion predicts Alzheimer’s disease in mild cognitive impairment. BMC Neurol. 2002, 2, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Kier, E.L.; Staib, L.H.; Davis, L.M.; Bronen, R.A. MR Imaging of the Temporal Stem: Anatomic Dissection Tractography of the Uncinate Fasciculus, Inferior Occipitofrontal Fasciculus, and Meyer’s Loop of the Optic Radiation. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2004, 25, 677–691. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  30. Chen, H.; Huang, L.; Li, H.; Qian, Y.; Yang, D.; Qing, Z.; Luo, C.; Li, M.; Zhang, B.; Xu, Y. Microstructural disruption of the right inferior fronto-occipital and inferior longitudinal fasciculus contributes to WMH-related cognitive impairment. CNS Neurosci. Ther. 2020, 26, 576–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  31. Baloyannis, S.J.; Mavroudis, I.; Baloyannis, I.S.; Costa, V. Mammillary Bodies in Alzheimer’s Disease: A Golgi and Electron Microscope Study. Am. J. Alzheimer’s Dis. Other Dement. 2015, 31, 247–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Vann, S.D. Re-evaluating the role of the mammillary bodies in memory. Neuropsychologia 2010, 48, 2316–2327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Scheltens, P.; Blennow, K.; Breteler, M.M.; de Strooper, B.; Frisoni, G.B.; Salloway, S.; van der Flier, W.M. Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet 2016, 388, 505–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jones, B.F.; Barnes, J.; Uylings, H.B.; Fox, N.; Frost, C.; Witter, M.P.; Scheltens, P. Differential Regional Atrophy of the Cingulate Gyrus in Alzheimer Disease: A Volumetric MRI Study. Cereb. Cortex 2005, 16, 1701–1708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ebertoux, M.; O’Callaghan, C.; Eflanagan, E.; Hodges, J.R.; Hornberger, M. Fronto-Striatal Atrophy in Behavioral Variant Frontotemporal Dementia and Alzheimer’s Disease. Front. Neurol. 2015, 6, 147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Looi, J.C.L.; Svensson, L.; Lindberg, O.; Zandbelt, B.B.; Ostberg, P.; Orndahl, E.; Wahlund, L.O. Putaminal volume in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and Alzheimer disease: Differential volumes in dementia subtypes and controls. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 2009, 30, 1552–1560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Barber, R.; McKeith, I.; Ballard, C.; O’Brien, J. Volumetric MRI study of the caudate nucleus in patients with dementia with Lewy bodies, Alzheimer’s disease, and vascular dementia. J. Neurol. Neurosurg. Psychiatry 2002, 72, 406–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Lehmann, M.; Koedam, E.L.; Barnes, J.; Bartlett, J.; Ryan, N.S.; Pijnenburg, Y.A.; Barkhof, F.; Wattjes, M.P.; Scheltens, P.; Fox, N.C. Posterior cerebral atrophy in the absence of medial temporal lobe atrophy in pathologically-confirmed Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol. Aging 2012, 33, 627.e1–627.e12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Karas, G.B.; Scheltens, P.; Rombouts, S.A.R.B.; van Schijndel, R.; Klein, M.; Jones, B.; van der Flier, W.; Vrenken, H.; Barkhof, F. Precuneus atrophy in early-onset Alzheimer’s disease: A morphometric structural MRI study. Neuroradiology 2007, 49, 967–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Shi, F.; Liu, B.; Zhou, Y.; Yu, C.; Jiang, T. Hippocampal volume and asymmetry in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease: Meta-analyses of MRI studies. Hippocampus 2009, 19, 1055–1064. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Tosun, D.; Schuff, N.; Rabinovici, G.D.; Ayakta, N.; Miller, B.L.; Jagust, W.; Kramer, J.; Weiner, M.M.; Rosen, H.J. Diagnostic utility of ASL-MRI and FDG-PET in the behavioral variant of FTD and AD. Ann. Clin. Transl. Neurol. 2016, 3, 740–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yu, J.; Lee, T.M. The longitudinal decline of white matter microstructural integrity in behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia and its association with executive function. Neurobiol. Aging 2019, 76, 62–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Binnewijzend, M.A.A.; Kuijer, J.P.; Benedictus, M.R.; van der Flier, W.M.; Wink, A.M.; Wattjes, M.P.; Van Berckel, B.N.M.; Scheltens, P.; Barkhof, F. Cerebral Blood Flow Measured with 3D Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin-labeling MR Imaging in Alzheimer Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment: A Marker for Disease Severity. Radiology 2013, 267, 221–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Bron, E.E.; Steketee, R.; Houston, G.; Oliver, R.; Achterberg, H.C.; Loog, M.; van Swieten, J.C.; Hammers, A.; Niessen, W.; Smits, M.; et al. Diagnostic classification of arterial spin labeling and structural MRI in presenile early stage dementia. Hum. Brain Mapp. 2014, 35, 4916–4931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Verfaillie, S.C.J.; Adriaanse, S.M.; Binnewijzend, M.A.A.; Benedictus, M.R.; Ossenkoppele, R.; Wattjes, M.P.; Pijnenburg, Y.A.L.; van der Flier, W.M.; Lammertsma, A.A.; Kuijer, J.P.A.; et al. Cerebral Perfusion and Glucose Metabolism in Alzheimer’s Disease and Frontotemporal Dementia: Two Sides of the Same coin? Eur. Radiol. 2015, 25, 3050–3059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Anazodo, U.C.; Finger, E.; Kwan, B.Y.M.; Pavlosky, W.; Warrington, J.C.; Guenther, M.; Prato, F.S.; Thiessen, J.D.; St Lawrence, K.S. Using simultaneous PET/MRI to compare the accuracy of diagnosing frontotemporal dementia by arterial spin labelling MRI and FDG-PET. Neuroimage Clin. 2017, 17, 405–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Putcha, D.; Brickhouse, M.; O’Keefe, K.; Sullivan, C.; Rentz, D.; Marshall, G.; Dickerson, B.; Sperling, R. Hippocampal Hyperactivation Associated with Cortical Thinning in Alzheimer’s Disease Signature Regions in Non-Demented Elderly Adults. J. Neurosci. 2011, 31, 17680–17688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Killiany, R.J.; Moss, M.B.; Albert, M.S.; Sandor, T.; Tieman, J.; Jolesz, F. Temporal Lobe Regions on Magnetic Resonance Imaging Identify Patients With Early Alzheimer’s Disease. Arch. Neurol. 1993, 50, 949–954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Lehéricy, S.; Baulac, M.; Chiras, J.; Piérot, L.; Martin, N.; Pillon, B.; Deweer, B.; Dubois, B.; Marsault, C. Amygdalohippocampal MR volume measurements in the early stages of Alzheimer disease. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 1994, 15, 929–937. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  50. Laakso, M.; Soininen, H.; Partanen, K.; Helkala, E.-L.; Hartikainen, P.; Vainio, P.; Hallikainen, M.; Hänninen, T.; Sr, P.J.R. Volumes of hippocampus, amygdala and frontal lobes in the MRI-based diagnosis of early Alzheimer’s disease: Correlation with memory functions. J. Neural Transm. Park Dis. Dement. Sect. 1995, 9, 73–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Wolters, F.J.; Zonneveld, H.I.; Hofman, A.; Van Der Lugt, A.; Koudstaal, P.J.; Vernooij, M.W.; Ikram, M.A. Cerebral Perfusion and the Risk of Dementia. Circulation 2017, 136, 719–728. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Wirth, M.; Binette, A.P.; Brunecker, P.; Köbe, T.; Witte, A.V.; Flöel, A. Divergent regional patterns of cerebral hypoperfusion and gray matter atrophy in mild cognitive impairment patients. J. Cereb. Blood Flow Metab. 2017, 37, 814–824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tomography 08 00018 g001 550
Figure 1. Views of the volumes of interest, exemplarily “inferior frontal white matter of the pars orbitalis (IFWMO)” (right: light green; left: dark green). Three-dimensional reconstruction with removed right brain hemisphere (except for the volume of interest) and partially removed frontotemporal brain segments of the left brain hemisphere, respectively, for better display. Images from top left, clockwise: 3D reconstruction, axial view, sagittal view and coronal view.
Figure 1. Views of the volumes of interest, exemplarily “inferior frontal white matter of the pars orbitalis (IFWMO)” (right: light green; left: dark green). Three-dimensional reconstruction with removed right brain hemisphere (except for the volume of interest) and partially removed frontotemporal brain segments of the left brain hemisphere, respectively, for better display. Images from top left, clockwise: 3D reconstruction, axial view, sagittal view and coronal view.
Tomography 08 00018 g001
Tomography 08 00018 g002a 550Tomography 08 00018 g002b 550
Figure 2. Significant atrophy of regions for FTD compared to CO (control)—volumes in mm3: (a) left STG; (b) left SOG; (c) left thalamus; (d) right thalamus; (e) left EC; (f) right EC.
Figure 2. Significant atrophy of regions for FTD compared to CO (control)—volumes in mm3: (a) left STG; (b) left SOG; (c) left thalamus; (d) right thalamus; (e) left EC; (f) right EC.
Tomography 08 00018 g002aTomography 08 00018 g002b
Tomography 08 00018 g003 550
Figure 3. Significant atrophy of regions for MCI compared to CO (control)—volumes in mm3: (a) left STG; (b) left IFO.
Figure 3. Significant atrophy of regions for MCI compared to CO (control)—volumes in mm3: (a) left STG; (b) left IFO.
Tomography 08 00018 g003
Tomography 08 00018 g004 550
Figure 4. A patient with diagnosed FTD and corresponding pASL perfusion maps showing reduced CBF in the frontotemporal regions. From left to right: FLAIR Sequence, T1w Sequence, pASL Sequence; perfusion data were visualized with OLEA SPHERE® 2.3 (Olea medical, La Ciotat, France)(white arrows indicating regions of atrophy and hypoperfusion).
Figure 4. A patient with diagnosed FTD and corresponding pASL perfusion maps showing reduced CBF in the frontotemporal regions. From left to right: FLAIR Sequence, T1w Sequence, pASL Sequence; perfusion data were visualized with OLEA SPHERE® 2.3 (Olea medical, La Ciotat, France)(white arrows indicating regions of atrophy and hypoperfusion).
Tomography 08 00018 g004
Table
Table 1. Demographic features of patients and controls.
Table 1. Demographic features of patients and controls.
COADFTDMCI
No.19557
Sex (M:F)7:124:11:44:3
Age (years)57.1 (46–78)63.6 (50–77)69.8 (62–79)63 (54–78)
MMSE3022.4 (10–27)24.6 (14–30)27.4 (25–29)
Note: AD indicates Alzheimer’s disease; FTD, frontotemporal dementia; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; CO, control subjects; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Examination.
Table
Table 2. Significant atrophy in brain regions of interest—FTD vs. CO.
Table 2. Significant atrophy in brain regions of interest—FTD vs. CO.
Brain Region of InterestMean Volume in FTD (in mm3)Mean Volume in CO (in mm3)Level of Significance (p)
MFG-DPFC left9525.611,480.00.053
MFG-DPFC-right9763.611,947.10.031
IFGO left2755.03347.10.023
IFGO right2062.22622.60.002
MFOG right3534.44028.00.041
RG left3770.24625.90.026
RG right3747.64691.50.006
STG left9212.411,653.50.004
STG right8948.210,913.40.004
STG-pole left4168.45227.80.013
AG left5866.86770.30.048
SOG left2051.22395.60.030
Insula left5104.86127.60.038
Insula right5202.06141.00.024
Amygdala left1071,81497,90.000
Amygdala right1217.21630.70.006
Hippocampus left2868.43442.00.022
Putamen left2886.03684.60.001
Putamen right3152.03876.30.002
GP left1124.21340.40.025
Thalamus left4468.45237.50.034
Thalamus right4668.85348.70.041
NucAccumbens right604.6730.80.049
Snigra left261.0318.80.026
Snigra right210.8256.30.048
CP left1536.21858.20.026
CP right1623.41916.50.050
ICP left631.4761.00.036
SCR left13,355.815,739.90.044
PCR left5040.66124.40.013
PCR right4243.25156.50.036
EC left2514.02862.10.034
EC right2433.02821.20.035
IFO left1534.81765.80.024
IFO right1561.21787.80.024
SS right3210.84012.90.009
CI right264.2374.70.003
Basal Forebrain left462.6536.50.044
IFWMO left1818.82283.60.008
IFWMO right1543.21881.60.010
Caudate-tail left273.4338.10.030
Caudate-tail right253.8347.00.022
Fimbria right16.436.50.011
Note: FTD indicates frontotemporal dementia; CO, control subjects.
Table
Table 3. Significant atrophy in brain regions of interest—MCI vs. CO.
Table 3. Significant atrophy in brain regions of interest—MCI vs. CO.
Brain Region of InterestMean Volume in MCI (in mm3)Mean Volume in CO (in mm3)Level of Significance (p)
SFG-pole left2000.32290.20.039
STG left10,094.411,653.50.033
STG right9364.710,913.40.009
MTG right12,041.713,891.30.030
MTG-pole left2108.62460.10.048
PHG right1059.11208.40.038
Hippocampus right3187.73510.20.016
Basal Forebrain left240.9277.90.059
Basal Forebrain right225.1277.20.006
SCP left736.0831.80.011
Pons left247.1284.90.029
IFO left1642.71765.80.051
Mammillary left80.9100.00.040
LFOWM right1523.41683.60.002
RGWM left1556.41787.80.052
STWM right7752.78730.20.050
rostralWM-ACC left65.1141.20.002
subcallosalWM-ACC right60.988.90.044
Note: MCI indicates mild cognitive impairment; CO, control subjects.
Table
Table 4. Significant atrophy in brain regions of interest—AD vs. CO.
Table 4. Significant atrophy in brain regions of interest—AD vs. CO.
Brain Region of InterestMean Volume in AD (in mm3)Mean Volume in CO (in mm3)Level of Significance (p)
STG right9516.610,913.40.056
SOG right1916.42465.60.008
Hippocampus right2873.03510.20.025
CGH right1182.61456.60.036
MTWM right7245.68682.20.045
Caudate-tail left259.4338.10.013
Note: AD indicates Alzheimer’s disease; CO, control subjects.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Marterstock, D.C.; Knott, M.F.X.; Hoelter, P.; Lang, S.; Oberstein, T.; Kornhuber, J.; Doerfler, A.; Schmidt, M.A. Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling and Segmented Brain Volumetry in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Frontotemporal Dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Tomography 2022, 8, 229-244. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/tomography8010018

AMA Style

Marterstock DC, Knott MFX, Hoelter P, Lang S, Oberstein T, Kornhuber J, Doerfler A, Schmidt MA. Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling and Segmented Brain Volumetry in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Frontotemporal Dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment. Tomography. 2022; 8(1):229-244. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/tomography8010018

Chicago/Turabian Style

Marterstock, Dominique Cornelius, Michael Franz Xaver Knott, Philip Hoelter, Stefan Lang, Timo Oberstein, Johannes Kornhuber, Arnd Doerfler, and Manuel A. Schmidt. 2022. "Pulsed Arterial Spin Labeling and Segmented Brain Volumetry in the Diagnostic Evaluation of Frontotemporal Dementia, Alzheimer’s Disease and Mild Cognitive Impairment" Tomography 8, no. 1: 229-244. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/tomography8010018

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop