Next Article in Journal
The Role of Ambivalent Sexism, Punitiveness, and Ability to Recognize Violence in the Perception of Sex Offenders: A Gender-Perspective Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Relationships between Coerced Sexting and Differentiation of Self: An Exploration of Protective Factors
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Sexes
Volume 2
Issue 4
10.3390/sexes2040038
sexes-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health and Lifestyle, Safety, Relationship and Personality Factors Influence Gender, Sex and Sexuality Issues among Youth—A Case Record Analysis from Youth Mental Health Promotion Clinics in Karnataka, India

by
Pradeep Banandur
1,*,
Swati Shahane
1,
Sathya Velu
1,
Sathrajith Bhargav
1,
Aditi Thakkar
1,
Virupaksha Hasiruvalli Gangappa
1,
Vani Naik
1,
Mutharaju Arelingaiah
2,
Lavanya Garady
3,
Jyoti Koujageri
4,
Sateesh L. Sajjanar
5,
Subhash Chandra Kashipalli Lakshminarayan
5,
Shalini Rajneesh
5,6 and
Gururaj Gopalkrishna
1
1
Department of Epidemiology, Center for Public Health, NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, Karnataka, India
2
Department of Psychiatric Social Work, NIMHANS, Bengaluru 560029, Karnataka, India
3
International Centre for Public Health Innovations, M S Ramaiah, Bengaluru 560054, Karnataka, India
4
Department of Management Studies, CMR University, Bengaluru 562149, Karnataka, India
5
Department of Youth Empowerment and Sports, Government of Karnataka, Bengaluru 560001, Karnataka, India
6
Planning Department, Government of Karnataka, Bengaluru 560001, Karnataka, India
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Sexes 2021, 2(4), 483-494; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sexes2040038
Submission received: 31 August 2021 / Revised: 13 October 2021 / Accepted: 11 November 2021 / Published: 23 November 2021
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Promoting positive identity and seeking early support for gender, sex and sexuality (GSS) issues among youth is vital. Understanding and addressing factors associated withGSS among them is critical. We assessed four-year case records (January 2017–December 2020) of all first visit youth mental health promotion clinic (YMHPC) clients (15–35 years) for factors associated with GSS issues in Karnataka. Overall, prevalence of GSS issues was 1.8% (189/10,340). Increased risk of GSS issues was observed among clients reporting suicidality (AOR = 4.27, 95% CI = 2.70–6.74) and relationship issues (AOR = 3.63, 95% CI = 2.36–5.57), followed by issues of safety (AOR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.72–3.81), personality (AOR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.60–3.85), health and lifestyle (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.77–4.19), smokers (AOR = 2.30, 95% CI = 1.24–4.27), and those who felt depressed (AOR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.43–3.09) and worthless (AOR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.28–3.39). Clients aged 21–25 years (AOR = 1.80,95% CI = 1.27–2.54), male (AOR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.20–2.46) and who had been married (AOR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.51–3.57) had a higher risk of GSS issues than those aged 15–20 years and other counterparts, respectively. Clients who drank alcohol (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.30–0.81) had reduced risk of GSS issues. The findings re-iterate the importance of early recognition of factors (essential precursors) of GSS issues among youth. The study highlights the importance of promoting awareness and improving primordial prevention of possible GSS issues in later life. This study has important implications on youth mental health promotion programs, especially in countries like India.

1. Introduction

Nearly 16% of the world’s total population (~1.2 billion) is youth (15–24 years) [1]. India has the largest youth population in the world [2] with nearly 40% aged between 13 and 35 years [3]. Youth in Karnataka (a South Indian state) constitute nearly 39% of the population [2]. This period is characterized by rapid physical, psychological and social development and maturation [4] that affect the gender, sex and sexuality(GSS) of an individual. Physical changes like the onset of menstruation and development of secondary sexual characteristics and psychological changes like body image perception andself-understanding of sexual identity and role occur along with changes in social behaviours, like being independent; exploratory behaviours (smoking, violence, sexual perversions), development of social and financial autonomy; intimate relationships, etc. [5].
During this phase of transition, youth become more aware of GSS issues. Gender, sex and sexuality encompass a wide range of topics like gender roles, perspectives, discrimination, gender-based violence, child sexual abuse, sexually transmitted diseases/infections, etc. These issues need to be addressed during adolescence and youth to ensure healthy adulthood. Issues related to these are not well understood. Norms and expectations related to gender, sex and sexuality often differ between sexes and are set by societies; deviations are often sanctioned [6]. Most societies and communities are conservative in discussing GSS openly. Mainstreaming of GSS is mainly attempted through sex education aspart of the academic curriculum. However, in conservative societies like in India, most teachers are not comfortable doing this [7]. Furthermore, associated societal norms, taboos, myths and misconceptions add to the problem. This leads youth to explore social media and internet for GSS related information and confront established social structures, taboos and norms within their societies.
Gender, sex and sexuality (GSS) are crucial determinants and antecedents of mental health [8], especially among youth during their formative years. GSS issues are known to be associated with a variety of harmful mental health consequences, including depression and attempted suicide affecting education and careers [9]. Existing cultural norms and social discrimination may discourage young people from discussing their GSS issues with others. The disclosure of a stigmatized identity might also lead to rejection and thereby impact the mental health of an individual [10].
Promoting and integrating positive identity and seeking early support related to GSS issues among youth arevital. In this context, it is critical to understand factors associated with GSS and address them during adolescence and youth. Considering the challenges faced by youth, Yuva Spandana (meaning responding to youth), a youth mental health promotion program is being implemented by the Department of Youth Empowerment and Sports (DYES), Government of Karnataka (GoK), with technical support from the Department of Epidemiology, NIMHANS. Trained Yuva Samalochakas and Yuva Parivarthakas (Youth Change Agents) provide guidance and counselling services through youth mental health promotion clinics named Yuva Spandana Kendras (meaning youth response centres) established at every district stadium in Karnataka [11]. Youth with any issue (including issues related to GSS) visit these clinics and avail themselves of guidance/counselling and referral services. The present study aims to assess factors associated with gender, sex and sexuality issues amongst youth attending youth mental health promotion clinics in Karnataka.

2. Materials and Methods

Case record analysis from a tailor-made real-time computerized data management system specifically developed for Yuva Spandana was performed. All registration and first visit case records of beneficiaries aged between 15–35 years utilizing services through Yuva Spandana Kendras between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2020 in Karnataka were considered for the analysis.
Registration details included socio-demographic details (district, locality, age and gender, level of education, marital status) and habits of beneficiaries. The visit details included issues reported by beneficiaries namely, health and life style issues, education and career, relationship issues, safety, personality and gender, sex and sexuality issues. Gender, sex and sexuality issues included issues related to gender roles, gender discrimination, gender-based violence, child sexual abuse andsexually transmitted diseases/infections. The visit form was filled out based on face-to-face clinical interview conducted in the clinic and included questions like “Haveyou face any issues related to gender role, gender discrimination, gender-based violence and sexually transmitted diseases?”. Since the Yuva Spandana program focuses on providing mental health services, the questions were customized based on the client’s needs, which facilitated counselling sessions. Specifically, gender roles were defined based on the WHO definition [12]. Gender discrimination was identified based on the client’s response to the question of whether he/she felt discriminated against based on their gender, either at workplace, socially orwithin the family. Gender-based violence constituted any form of violence (physical, psychological or sexual) like being punched, hit, kicked, insulted, ignored, yelled at, made tofeel ashamed or forced/coerced to perform sex or touched inappropriately by anyone [13,14] during the past year and was based on self-reporting. Sexually transmitted diseases (including HIV) were reported based on the self-reporting of symptoms, mainly genital ulcers, discharge, swelling, a previous diagnosis of STIs or history of syndromic case management. It also included those who reported issues related to myths and misconceptions related to STIs and HIV [15]. In addition, the visit form had a set of 18 closed-ended yes/no questions related to the beneficiary’s experience of different emotions or feelings like feeling depressed, anxious, lonely, tired, or helpless, excessively worried, a loss of interest in work, unableto make decisions and forgetfulness, as well as concentration-related problems, suicidal ideation and guilt. This was accompanied by information on the client’sawareness of parents/friends attempting suicide.

Statistical Analysis

A total of 10,664 beneficiaries were registered during the study period. Out of this, 10,340 beneficiaries who were aged 15–35 years with both registration and first-visit forms available were included for analysis. Various factors associated with gender, sex and sexuality issues amongst youth attending Yuva Spandana Kendra in Karnataka were hypothesized. Various issues were reported, and experience of different emotions along with socio-demographic characteristics and habits (as listed in Table 1, Table 2 and Table 3) were considered exposure variables.
Binary and multiple logistic regression analyses were performed with self-report of having gender, sex and sexuality issues as the dependent variable. All exposure variables that were significantly associated with GSS issuesat a 10% level (p < 0.10) in the binary analysis were considered eligible to be included in the final multiple logistic regression model. These variables were included in the multivariable model one after the other using a forward stepping process. Those variables which changed the measure of effect (odds ratio) of at least one preceding variable by 10% and significant at 5% (p < 0.05) wereretained in the model. In addition, the significance of including a variable in the model was tested using a likelihood ratio test, comparing the previous model without the variable. The goodness of fit for the final multivariate model was assessed using the Hosmer–Lemeshow test, and a ROC curve was drawn to check the discrimination ability of the final multivariate logistic regression model. All the descriptive analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel 2007. Logistic regression analysis was performed using Stata 12.0 software for windows.
Appropriate Ethical approval for the study was obtained from the Institutional Ethics Committee at NIHMANS, Bangalore vide letter No. NIMH/DO/ETHICS COMMITTEE MEETING/2018, Dated 10 January 2019.

3. Results

Overall, 189 (1.8%) beneficiaries reported having gender, sex and sexuality issues. Most of them were males (67.72%), aged 15–20 years (43.9%) and from rural areas (71.4%). A majority of the clients reporting gender, sex and sexuality issues had more than 10 years of schooling (72%) and hadnever been married (72.48%). All the socio-demographic characteristics except locality were significantly associated with GSS issues (Table 1).
Table
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics and gender, sex and sexuality issues among beneficiaries attending youth mental health promotion clinics in Karnataka. (2017–2020) (N = 10,340).
Table 1. Socio-demographic characteristics and gender, sex and sexuality issues among beneficiaries attending youth mental health promotion clinics in Karnataka. (2017–2020) (N = 10,340).
VariablesGender, Sex & Sexuality IssuesTotalCrude Odds Ratio
Present (189)Absent (10,151)N = 10,340OR [95% CI]p-Value
Age in Completed Yearsn%n%N%
15–208343.9624461.5632761.2Reference
21–255428.6225222.2230622.31.80 [1.27–2.54]<0.001
26–303518.5108810.7112310.92.42 [1.62–3.61]<0.001
31–35179.05675.65845.62.25 [1.32–3.82]0.003
Gender
Female6132.3451844.5457944.3Reference
Male12867.7563355.5576155.71.68 [1.23–2.28]<0.001
Locality
Urban5428.6330832.6336232.5Reference
Rural13571.4684367.4697867.51.20 [0.87–1.66]0.243
Years of schooling
<7 years2211.67477.47697.4Reference
8–10 years3116.4166916.4170016.40.63 [0.36–1.09]0.102
>10 years13672.0773576.2787176.10.59 [0.37–0.94]0.027
Occupation
Students10957.7723771.3734671.0Reference
O Others8042.3291428.7299429.01.82 [1.36–2.44]<0.001
Marital Status
Never married13772.5919490.6933190.2Reference
Ever married5227.59579.410099.83.64 [2.63–5.05]<0.001
Total1891.810,15198.210,340100
OR—Odds Ratio; CI—Confidence Interval.
A majority reported health and lifestyle (79.4%) and personality issues (79.4%). All the other issues, except education and academic issues, were significant during binary logistic regression analysis. Those who had ever attempted or had thoughts of suicide and those with substance use were significantly associated with gender, sex and sexuality issues (Table 2).
Table
Table 2. Issues reported, suicidal attempts, substance use and gender, sex and sexuality issues among beneficiaries attending youth mental health promotion clinics during 2017–2020 in Karnataka (N = 10,340).
Table 2. Issues reported, suicidal attempts, substance use and gender, sex and sexuality issues among beneficiaries attending youth mental health promotion clinics during 2017–2020 in Karnataka (N = 10,340).
VariablesGender Sex & Sexuality IssuesTotalOdds Ratio
Yes (189)No (10,151)N = 10,340OR [95% CI] *p-Value
n%N%n%
Issues Reported
Health and lifestyle issues15079.4246524.3261525.311.99 [8.40–17.10]<0.001
Personality issues15079.4250724.7265725.718.05 [13.07–24.93]<0.001
Education and academic issues15381.0804879.3820179.311.72 [8.22–16.72]0.575
Safety issues10857.17657.58738.41.11 [0.77–1.60]<0.001
Relationship issues13672.0126312.4139913.516.35 [12.15–22.02]<0.001
Suicidal Attempts Among
Family members3317.54274.24604.44.81 [3.26–7.09]<0.001
Friends3216.94654.64974.84.24 [2.87–6.27]<0.001
Self4523.81721.72172.118.13 [12.55–26.17]<0.001
Substance Use
Tobacco chewing136.92982.93113.02.44 [1.37–4.34]0.002
Tobacco smoking179.02052.02222.14.79 [2.85–8.04]<0.001
Drinking2814.83873.84154.04.38 [2.90–6.63]<0.001
* OR—Odds Ratio; CI—Confidence Interval.
Table
Table 3. Distribution of emotions experienced and gender, sex and sexuality issues among beneficiaries attending youth mental health promotion clinics during 2017–2020 in Karnataka. (N = 10,340).
Table 3. Distribution of emotions experienced and gender, sex and sexuality issues among beneficiaries attending youth mental health promotion clinics during 2017–2020 in Karnataka. (N = 10,340).
VariablesGender Sex & Sexuality IssuesTotalOdds Ratio
Yes (189)No (10,151)N = 10,340OR [95% CI] *p-Value
N%N%n%
Feel anxious10957.7212020.9222921.65.16 [3.82–6.91]<0.001
Feel depressed6836.06996.97677.47.59 [5.59–10.32]<0.001
Not interested indoing any work6132.37657.58268.05.84 [4.27–8.00]<0.001
Feel tired or helpless6433.98358.28998.75.71 [4.19–7.78]<0.001
Worry about problems5428.67627.58167.94.92 [3.56–6.81]<0.001
Feel like lost everything in life due to their problems3619.04003.94364.25.73 [3.93–8.35]<0.001
Feel incapable of making decisions or solving problems6132.38458.39068.85.24 [3.83–7.17]<0.001
Feel lonely5127.05745.76256.06.16 [4.42–8.59]<0.001
Unable to trust anyone3216.92602.62922.87.75 [5.19–11.56]<0.001
Forgetfulness2312.23133.13363.24.35 [2.77–6.83]<0.001
Difficulty in concentration3216.93183.13503.46.30 [4.24–9.36]<0.001
Feel like running away from everyone2312.21591.61821.88.70 [5.47–13.83]<0.001
Feel like committing suicide2412.7991.01231.214.76 [9.21–23.67]<0.001
Feel like it would have been good to have died2613.8940.91201.217.06 [10.76–27.06]<0.001
Angry with people around2814.83763.74043.94.52 [2.98–6.84]<0.001
Feel like failed in managing responsibilities2714.32752.73022.95.98 [3.91–9.15]<0.001
Feel guilty3015.94514.44814.74.05 [2.71–6.06]<0.001
Feel worthless3418.03493.43833.76.16 [4.18–9.06]<0.001
* OR—Odds Ratio; CI—Confidence Interval.
All 18 variables related to emotions experienced by the beneficiaries were significantly (<0.001) associated with self-reporting of gender, sex and sexuality issues. Among these, most beneficiaries reported feeling anxious (57.7%), followed by feeling depressed (36%), feeling tired or helpless (33.9%) and feeling incapable of making decisions or solving the problems (32.3%).
Multiple logistic regression analysis (Table 4) revealed that male beneficiaries (AOR = 1.72, 95% CI = 1.20–2.46) had 1.72 times higher risk of GSS issues compared to female beneficiaries. Beneficiaries who were married (AOR = 2.32, 95% CI = 1.51–3.57) had twice the risk of GSS issues compared to those who had never been married. Youth reporting health and lifestyle issues (AOR = 2.27, 95% CI = 1.77–4.19), relationship issues (AOR = 3.63, 95% CI = 2.36–5.57), personality issues (AOR = 2.48, 95% CI = 1.60–3.85) and safety issues (AOR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.72–3.81) were associated with increased risk ofGSS issues. Beneficiaries attempting suicide (AOR = 4.27, CI = 2.70–6.74) had 4 times increased risk of GSSissues. Beneficiaries who had the habit of smoking tobacco (AOR = 2.30, CI = 1.24–4.27) had 2.3 times increased risk of GSS issues compared to those who didnot smoke. Youth who felt depressed (AOR = 2.10, 95% CI = 1.43–3.09) and worthless (AOR = 2.08, 95% CI = 1.28–3.39) were associated with increased risk of GSS issues. Interestingly, every unit increase in drinking (AOR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.30–0.81) was associated with 51% reduction in gender, sex and sexuality issues.

4. Discussion

Overall, among 10,340 youth clients of Yuva Spandana, 189 (1.8%) had gender, sex and sexuality issues. Age, gender, marital status, issues reported, suicidality, substance use and feeling depressed or worthless wereassociated with risk of GSS issues among youth in Karnataka. Youth reporting suicidality and relationship issues had the strongest association of increased risk of having GSS issues among clients. Youth with safety issues, personality issues, and health and lifestyle issues also had increased risk of GSS issues. Clients who felt depressed and worthless were associated with increased risk of GSS issues. Clients aged 21–25 years, males, and those thathad been married had a significantly higher risk of GSS issues compared to those aged 15–20 years, females, and those that had never been married, respectively. Tobacco smoking was associated with increased risk, while drinking alcohol was associated with reduced risk of GSS issues.
Our study focused on GSS issues, which includes gender roles, discrimination, GBV, STIs and child abuse related issues. Most studies focus on individual GSS issues like sexual violence [16]; GBV [17]; STIs [18], etc., and on vulnerable populations like LGBT [19], sex workers [20], children [21], migrants [22], women [23] and conflict settings [24]. To our knowledge, studies focusing on multiple GSS issues amongst youth are minimal/rare. Addressing GSS issues during youth through health promotion islikely to be beneficial to prevent health issues in later life, especially mental health issues. It is known that the cost of population level health promotion interventions issignificantly lesser than the cost of individual interventions [25]. The period of youth is the right time to invest in health promotion since youth are mostly healthy and free of disease. Furthermore, in a country like India, youth form >1/3rd of the demographic dividend and investing intheir health is likely to yield better results.
Clients with issues related to health and lifestyle, relationships, personality and safety had higher risk of gender, sex and sexuality issues compared to those without issues.It is well known that gender and sexuality haveinfluence on overall health status, care seeking and access to health [26,27]. There is strong and clear evidence regarding gender-based violence affecting physical and psychological health [28,29,30] as well as relationships [31]. It also influences the social, economic, spiritual, and emotional well-being of individuals [32]. Personality issues are also associated significantly with GSS issues. One of the 5 personality traits, neuroticism, is related to issues with sexuality like sexual guilt [33,34], sexual depression and anxiety, as well as reduced sexual satisfaction [35], thus further affecting sexual orientation. Safety issues are also associated with gender, sex and sexuality issues in the current study. While disclosing their genderpreference to others or when the information is disclosed by others, concerns regarding safety issues take an important role. Absence of protective environments is considered as one of the problems related to vulnerability in health-related areas among sexual minority groups [36].
Association between GSS issues and gender is inconclusive. It was observed that male clients (1.72 times) are at higher risk of GSS issues compared to female clients. In contrast, some studies report women having higher risk and prevalence of sex and sexuality issues like sexual violence [37] and sexual victimization [38]. These studies have focused on sexual violence. Other GSS issues are rarely addressed. This might be the reason for contrasting observations in this analysis. In addition, social desirability might influence men reporting issues related to gender roles, GBV and discrimination more than women. Societal acceptance, patriarchy and the prevalence of male dominated social ecosystems might normalize these issues among women, leading to lack of perception of such issues and thereby reduced reporting among women [39]. However, qualitative studies looking at these interrelationships to understand gender and GSS issues are needed.
Similarly, the association between marital status and GSS seems complex. It was observed that married clients had twice the risk of GSS issues compared to unmarried clients. Gender-based violence is considered acceptable and in-practice among married couples in Indian families [40]. However, another study suggested that gender-based violence is less likely to be associated with marriage [41]. This needs further exploration and understanding. However, public health interventions such as YuvaSpandana (being a health promotion program) can serve as effective platforms to reduce risk of violence among married couples
This analysis, furthermore, adds to the existing strong evidence that suicidality increases risk of GSS issues, in particular, issues related to sexual orientation [42], gender-based violence [43] and gender discrimination [44,45,46]. Stigma, social norms and taboos associated with disclosure and lack of opportunities for open discussion of GSS issues might contribute to suicidality among those with GSS. Being a cross sectional assessment, the temporality of association is difficult to assess.
Smoking tobacco (2.30 times) was associated with increased risk of GSS issues, thus supporting previous study findings [47]. Interestingly, in this study, drinking alcohol was associated with a 51% reduction in GSS issues. Some studies infer that an individual’s false perception that alcohol reduces stress and increases physical pleasure and sexual enjoyment [48] increases his/her ability to cope with distress and to escape reality [49] and thereby influences lack of perception of GSS issues, resulting in under-reporting of GSS issues. There are studies highlighting stronger association between partner violence and partner excessive alcohol use [50], sex related alcohol expectancies to sexual behaviour and alcohol consumption [51]
Mental health problems and GSS issues are closely associated [52]. Depression and anxiety disorders are known to be strong markers of GBV [17,52], gender discrimination [53], sexual issues [54] and STIs [55]. Youth who felt depressed (2.10 times) and worthless (2.08 times) had significantly increased risk of GSS issues in this analysis. Significantly high rates of depression have been associated with individuals in the emerging sexual and gender minority categories [56]. There is also strong association between stigma related to STI, gender non-conformity and depression [57] Unsafe environments; unsympathetic, unwilling and unapproachable attitudes of others; and severe victimization with respect to GSS issues might make youth believe that their isolation or rejection is chronic and thus consider suicide, a severe criteria for depression, as a viable option [58]. Under Yuva Spandana, all clients are asked about the co-existence of 18 feelings/emotions (Table 3) during their visits. However, the remaining 16 emotions or feelings were not associated with GSS amongst youth in Karnataka in the adjusted analysis. This enquiry has brought to light the association of mental health issues and GSS in this study. Furthermore, with respect to mental health issues and suicidality as associated factors with GSS issues, it is more likelythat GSS issues are antecedents to mental health problems rather than vice versa, especially amongst youth [59]. It is important to evaluate mental health issues among those reporting with GSS issues or vice versa.
The current study is part of a first-of-its-kind youth mental health promotion program in India. The uniqueness of the study lies with identification of risk factors of GSS issues such as personality issues, relationship issues, safety issues, health and lifestyle issues, and emotional experiences amongst youth. These prevalent and critical yet neglected issues of youth health and wellbeing are observed contributing to GSS issues, which are known antecedents of mental health problems in the future. The study comprehensively looks at GSS issues among youth rather than focusing on individual/specific components of GSS. This facilitates provision of early intervention and shows the importance of looking upstream. This study has utilized real-time data of all clients visiting Yuva Spandana Kendras covering the entire state of Karnataka. In addition, a large sample size from across 30 districts of Karnataka is a strength of this study. Real-time digital data entry minimizes data entry errors and ensures standardized data entry, unlike other programmatic data. Guidance is provided by trained Yuva Samalochakas, ensuring adequate privacy and confidentiality and reducing the possibility of information bias. Furthermore, built-in systems to ensure the quality of data collected within the program safeguard the reliability of study findings.

5. Limitations

Certain limitations of this study need specific mention. By design, this is a cross sectional study. The temporality of association is difficult to ascertain between GSS issues and its risk factors. However, youth mental health promotion services such as this could incorporate these factors for assessment while providing services. Information related to GSS and its risk factors are sensitive and subject to social desirability bias. However, trained counsellors, maintaining adequate confidentiality and privacy are likely to minimize social undesirability. This study doesnot consider timelines for any of the issues reported. It only assesses currently prevailing issues and emotions.

6. Conclusions

Despite these limitations, the findings of this study re-iterate thesignificance of early recognition of factors that are essential precursors of gender, sex and sexuality issues among youth. The study throws light on the importance of promoting awareness regarding gender, sex and sexuality issues and ensuring primordial prevention of possible gender, sex and sexuality related problems in later life, especially mental health. Interventions need to focus on societal interventions aiming to achieve open attitude towards GSS issues, breaking existing harmful societal norms and taboos, and facilitating disclosure of GSS issues within the society. Interventions focused on gender sensitization, co-existence of mental health issues, suicidality, and other issues related to health and lifestyle, personality, safety and relationships among those with GSS issues or vice versa need to be implemented. Further research onempowering societies and individuals through health promotion related to these issues islikely to yield cost-effective outcomes. This study has important implications foryouth mental health promotion programs especially in India and countries like India.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.B., G.G. and S.S.; methodology, P.B., S.S. and S.B.; software, P.B. and S.V.; validation, P.B. and S.V.; formal analysis, P.B., S.S. and S.V.; investigation P.B., L.G., V.H.G., and M.A.; resources, P.B.; data curation, S.V. and J.K., writing—original draft preparation, P.B., S.S., S.V., S.B.,A.T., V.H.G., V.N., M.A., L.G., J.K., S.L.S., S.C.K.L., S.R., and G.G.; writing—review and editing P.B., S.S., S.B., and A.T.; visualization P.B., S.S. and S.V.; supervision, P.B., S.S., and S.B.; project administration, P.B., S.R. and S.C.K.L.; funding acquisition, P.B. and G.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The primary data collection for Yuva Spandana is funded by Department of youth empowerment and sports, Government of Karnataka. However, there was no funding for the preparation of this article. In addition, the funding agency has had no role in design of the study; the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; or in writing this article.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee NIMHANS, Bangalore vide letter No. NIMH/DO/ETHICS COMMITTEE MEETING/2018, Dated 10 January 2019.

Informed Consent Statement

This study utilized case records of clients attending YMHPCs in Karnataka over a four-year period. Patient consent was obtained for the purposes of providing services. The study utilized de-identified data of these clients. Ethical approval was obtained for this analysis.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

S.L.S., S.C. and S.R. are part of the funding agency. However, they participated in writing the manuscript and approving the final manuscript. All other authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. International Youth Day, 2019—Ten Key Messages. Available online: https://www.un.org/development/desa/youth/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2019/08/WYP2019_10-Key-Messages_GZ_8AUG19.pdf (accessed on 30 August 2021).
  2. Registrar General and Census Commissioner, Census of India. 2011. Available online: https://censusindia.gov.in/vital_statistics/SRS_Report/9Chap%202%20-%202011.pdf (accessed on 31 March 2021).
  3. National Youth Policy. 2014. Available online: https://www.rgniyd.gov.in/sites/default/files/pdfs/scheme/nyp_2014.pdf (accessed on 27 August 2021).
  4. Kar, S.K.; Choudhury, A. Understanding normal development of adolescent sexuality: A bumpy ride. J. Hum. Reprod. Sci. 2015, 8, 70–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Christie, D.; Viner, R. Adolescent development. BMJ 2005, 330, 301–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Fatusi, A.O.; Hindin, M.J. Adolescents and youth in developing countries: Health and development issues in context. J. Adolesc. 2010, 33, 499–508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Rao GpVidya, K.; Sriramya, V. The Indian “girl” psychology: A perspective. Indian J. Psychiatry 2015, 57, 212. [Google Scholar]
  8. Carod-Artal, F.J. Social Determinants of Mental Health. In Global Mental Health; Bährer-Kohler, S., Carod-Artal, F.J., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2017; pp. 33–46. Available online: http://0-link-springer-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/978-3-319-59123-0_4 (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  9. Atteberry-Ash, B.; Walls, N.E.; Kattari, S.K.; Peitzmeier, S.M.; Kattari, L.; Langenderfer-Magruder, L. Forced sex among youth: Accrual of risk by gender identity, sexual orientation, mental health and bullying. J. LGBT Youth 2020, 17, 193–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Pachankis, J.E.; Cochran, S.D.; Mays, V.M. The mental health of sexual minority adults in and out of the closet: A population-based study. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2015, 83, 890–901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Banandur, S.P.; Sukumar, G.M.; Arelingaiah, M.; Garady, L.; Koujageri, J.M.; Sajjanar, S.L.; Hadapad, B.; Ramesh, M.S.; Gopalkrishna, G. Effectiveness of a Structured Training Module on Different Learning Domains among Yuva Parivarthakas under Yuva Spandana Program. Indian J. Psychol. Med. 2020, 42, 182–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. World Health Organization. Gender Climate Change and Health; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2014. [Google Scholar]
  13. Mitchell, C.; Anglin, D. Intimate partner violence: How it harms your patients and impacts your practice. In Women’s Health in Clinical Practice; Clouse, A.L., Sherif, K., Eds.; Humana Press: Totowa, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 355–384. Available online: http://0-link-springer-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/978-1-59745-469-8_17 (accessed on 13 October 2021).
  14. Council of Europe Convention on Preventing and Combating Violence against Women and Domestic Violence. 2011. Available online: https://rm.coe.int/168008482e (accessed on 12 August 2021).
  15. Abdul, R.; Gerritsen, A.A.M.; Mwangome, M.; Geubbels, E. Prevalence of self-reported symptoms of sexually transmitted infections, knowledge and sexual behaviour among youth in semi-rural Tanzania in the period of adolescent friendly health services strategy implementation. BMC Infect. Dis. 2018, 18, 229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Worke, M.D.; Koricha, Z.B.; Debelew, G.T. Prevalence of sexual violence in Ethiopian workplaces: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Reprod. Health 2020, 17, 195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Vázquez, F.L.; Torres, A.; Otero, P. Gender-based violence and mental disorders in female college students. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 2012, 47, 1657–1667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. MacCarthy, S.; Poteat, T.; Xia, Z.; Roque, N.L.; Kim, A.; Baral, S.; Reisner, S.L. Current research gaps: A global systematic review of HIV and sexually transmissible infections among transgender populations. Sex Health 2017, 14, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Rothman, E.F.; Exner, D.; Baughman, A.L. The Prevalence of Sexual Assault Against People Who Identify as Gay, Lesbian, or Bisexual in the United States: A Systematic Review. Trauma Violence Abus. 2011, 12, 55–66. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  20. Deering, K.N.; Amin, A.; Shoveller, J.; Nesbitt, A.; Garcia-Moreno, C.; Duff, P.; Argento, E.; Shannon, K. A Systematic Review of the Correlates of Violence Against Sex Workers. Am. J. Public Health 2014, 104, e42–e54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Abajobir, A.A.; Kisely, S.; Maravilla, J.C.; Williams, G.; Najman, J.M. Gender differences in the association between childhood sexual abuse and risky sexual behaviours: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Child Abus. Negl. 2017, 63, 249–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Keygnaert, I.; Vettenburg, N.; Temmerman, M. Hidden violence is silent rape: Sexual and gender-based violence in refugees, asylum seekers and undocumented migrants in Belgium and the Netherlands. Cult. Health Sex. 2012, 14, 505–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Patel, V.; Kirkwood, B.R.; Pednekar, S.; Pereira, B.; Barros, P.; Fernandes, J.; Datta, J.; Pai, R.; Weiss, H.; Mabey, D. Gender Disadvantage and Reproductive Health Risk Factors for Common Mental Disorders in Women: A Community Survey in India. Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 2006, 63, 404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Davies, S.E.; True, J. The politics of counting and reporting conflict-related sexual and gender-based violence: The case of Myanmar. Int. Fem. J. Politics 2017, 19, 4–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Cecchini, M.; Sassi, F.; Lauer, J.A.; Lee, Y.Y.; Guajardo-Barron, V.; Chisholm, D. Tackling of unhealthy diets, physical inactivity, and obesity: Health effects and cost-effectiveness. Lancet 2010, 376, 1775–1784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Iyer, A.; Sen, G.; George, A. The Dynamics of Gender and Class in Access to Health Care: Evidence from Rural Karnataka, India. Int. J. Health Serv. 2007, 37, 537–554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Ostlin, P.; Eckermann, E.; Mishra, U.S.; Nkowane, M.; Wallstam, E. Gender and health promotion: A multisectoral policy approach. Health Promot. Int. 2006, 21, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. World Health Organization. Violence against Women—A Priority Health Issue; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  29. World Health Organization. Domestic Violence: A Priority Public Health Issue in the Western Pacific Region; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  30. García-Moreno, C.; World Health Organization. WHO Multi-Country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence against Women: Initial Results on Prevalence, Health Outcomes and Women’s Responses; World Health Organization: Geneva, Switzerland, 2005; Available online: http://www.who.int/gender/violence/who_multicountry_study/en (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  31. Meier, A.; Hull, K.E.; Ortyl, T.A. Young Adult Relationship Values at the Intersection of Gender and Sexuality. J. Marriage Fam. 2009, 71, 510–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  32. Klein, R. Sickening Relationships: Gender-Based Violence, Women’s Health, and the Role of Informal Third Parties. J. Soc. Pers. Relatsh. 2004, 21, 149–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Heaven, P.C.L.; Fitzpatrick, J.; Craig, F.L.; Kelly, P.; Sebar, G. Five personality factors and sex: Preliminary findings. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2000, 28, 1133–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Shafer, A.B. The Big Five and Sexuality Trait Terms as Predictors of Relationships and Sex. J. Res. Personal. 2001, 35, 313–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Heaven, P.C.L.; Crocker, D.; Edwards, B.; Preston, N.; Ward, R.; Woodbridge, N. Personality and sex. Personal. Individ. Differ. 2003, 35, 411–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Grossman, A.H.; D’augelli, A.R. Transgender Youth: Invisible and Vulnerable. J. Homosex. 2006, 51, 111–128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  37. Babu, B.V.; Kar, S.K. Domestic violence against women in eastern India: A population-based study on prevalence and related issues. BMC Public Health 2009, 9, 129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  38. Cortina, L.M.; Kubiak, S.P. Gender and posttraumatic stress: Sexual violence as an explanation for women’s increased risk. J. Abnorm. Psychol. 2006, 115, 753–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sardinha, L.; Catalán, H.E.N. Attitudes towards domestic violence in 49 low- and middle-income countries: A gendered analysis of prevalence and country-level correlates. PLoS ONE 2018, 13, e0206101. [Google Scholar]
  40. Simister, J.; Mehta, P.S. Gender-Based Violence in India: Long-Term Trends. J. Interpers. Violence 2010, 25, 1594–1611. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Arnold, D.; Gelaye, B.; Goshu, M.; Berhane, Y.; Williams, M.A. Prevalence and Risk Factors of Gender-Based Violence Among Female College Students in Awassa, Ethiopia. Violence Vict. 2008, 23, 787–800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. De Graaf, R.; Sandfort, T.G.M.; ten Have, M. Suicidality and Sexual Orientation: Differences Between Men and Women in a General Population-Based Sample from The Netherlands. Arch. Sex Behav. 2006, 35, 253–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Devries, K.M.; Seguin, M. Violence against women and suicidality: Does violence cause suicidal behaviour? In Key Issues in Mental Health; García-Moreno, C., Riecher-Rössler, A., Eds.; KARGER AG: Basel, Switzerland, 2013; pp. 148–158. Available online: https://www.karger.com/Article/FullText/342029 (accessed on 31 August 2021).
  44. Clements-Nolle, K.; Marx, R.; Katz, M. Attempted Suicide Among Transgender Persons: The Influence of Gender-Based Discrimination and Victimization. J. Homosex. 2006, 51, 53–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Fitzpatrick, K.K.; Euton, S.J.; Jones, J.N.; Schmidt, N.B. Gender role, sexual orientation and suicide risk. J. Affect. Disord. 2005, 87, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Silenzio, V.M.B.; Pena, J.B.; Duberstein, P.R.; Cerel, J.; Knox, K.L. Sexual Orientation and Risk Factors for Suicidal Ideation and Suicide Attempts Among Adolescents and Young Adults. Am. J. Public Health 2007, 97, 2017–2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. McCabe, S.E.; Hughes, T.L.; Bostwick, W.B.; West, B.T.; Boyd, C.J. Sexual orientation, substance use behaviors and substance dependence in the United States. Addiction 2009, 104, 1333–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Brown, S.A.; Goldman, M.S.; Inn, A.; Anderson, L.R. Expectations of reinforcement from alcohol: Their domain and relation to drinking patterns. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1980, 48, 419–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Nolen-Hoeksema, S. Gender differences in risk factors and consequences for alcohol use and problems. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2004, 24, 981–1010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Nayak, M.B.; Patel, V.; Bond, J.C.; Greenfield, T.K. Partner alcohol use, violence and women’s mental health: Population-based survey in India. Br. J. Psychiatry 2010, 196, 192–199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Leigh, B.C. The relationship of sex-related alcohol expectancies to alcohol consumption and sexual behavior. Addiction 1990, 85, 919–928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Rees, S.; Silove, D.; Chey, T.; Ivancic, L.; Steel, Z.; Creamer, M.; Teesson, M.R.; Bryant, R.; McFarlane, A.C.; Mills, K.L.; et al. Lifetime Prevalence of Gender-Based Violence in Women and the Relationship with Mental Disorders and Psychosocial Function. JAMA 2011, 306, 513–521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Gaeul, K.; Ginmok, K.; Lee, S.-K. Multidimensional gender discrimination in workplace and depressive symptoms. PLoS ONE 2020, 15, e0234415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Mccann, E. Investigating mental health service user views regarding sexual and relationship issues. J. Psychiatr. Ment. Health Nurs. 2010, 17, 251–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Erbelding, E.J.; Hummel, B.; Hogan, T.; Zenilman, J. High Rates of Depressive Symptoms in STD Clinic Patients. Sex Transm. Dis. 2001, 28, 281–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Borgogna, N.C.; McDermott, R.C.; Aita, S.L.; Kridel, M.M. Anxiety and depression across gender and sexual minorities: Implications for transgender, gender nonconforming, pansexual, demisexual, asexual, queer, and questioning individuals. Psychol. Sex. Orientat. Gend. Divers. 2019, 6, 54–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Logie, C.H.; Newman, P.A.; Chakrapani, V.; Shunmugam, M. Adapting the minority stress model: Associations between gender non-conformity stigma, HIV-related stigma and depression among men who have sex with men in South India. Soc. Sci. Med. 2012, 74, 1261–1268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Goodenow, C.; Szalacha, L.; Westheimer, K. School support groups, other school factors, and the safety of sexual minority adolescents. Psychol. Sch. 2006, 43, 573–589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Hossain, M.; Pearson, R.J.; McAlpine, A.; Bacchus, L.J.; Spangaro, J.; Muthuri, S.; Muuo, S.; Franchi, G.; Hess, T.; Bangha, M.; et al. Gender-based violence and its association with mental health among Somali women in a Kenyan refugee camp: A latent class analysis. J. Epidemiol. Community Health 2021, 75, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Table
Table 4. Multiple logistic regression analysis for factors associated with gender, sex and sexuality issues among beneficiaries attending youth mental health promotion clinics (2017–2020) in Karnataka. (N = 10,340).
Table 4. Multiple logistic regression analysis for factors associated with gender, sex and sexuality issues among beneficiaries attending youth mental health promotion clinics (2017–2020) in Karnataka. (N = 10,340).
Variables Adjusted Odds Ratio (AOR)
Crude Odds Ratio [95% CI]AOR [95% CI] *p-Value
Age in Completed Years
15–20ReferenceReference
21–251.80 [1.27–2.54]1.54 [1.05–2.27]0.027
26–302.42 [1.62–3.61]1.30 [0.80–2.12]0.276
31–352.25 [1.32–3.82]0.82 [0.43–1.59]0.573
Gender
FemaleReferenceReference
Male1.68 [1.23–2.28]1.72 [1.20–2.46]0.003
Marital Status
Never MarriedReferenceReference
Ever Married3.64 [2.63–5.05]2.32 [1.51–3.57]<0.001
Types of Issues Reported
Health and lifestyle issues11.99 [8.40–17.10]2.27 [1.77–4.19]<0.001
Relationship issues16.35 [12.15–22.02]3.63 [2.36–5.57]<0.001
Personality issues18.05 [13.07–24.93]2.48 [1.60–3.85]<0.001
Safety issues1.11 [0.77–1.60]2.56 [1.72–3.81]<0.001
Ever attempted suicide18.13 [12.55–26.17]4.27 [2.70–6.74]<0.001
Substance Use
Tobacco smoking4.79 [2.85–8.04]2.30 [1.24–4.27]0.008
Drinking4.38 [2.90–6.63]0.49 [0.30–0.81]0.005
Emotions Experienced
Feel depressed7.59 [5.59–10.32]2.10 [1.43–3.09]<0.001
Feel worthless6.16 [4.18–9.06]2.08 [1.28–3.39]0.003
* OR—Odds Ratio; CI—Confidence Interval. Hosmer–Lemeshow test statistics = 7.09. Area under the ROC curve is 0.89 implies that our model is 89% good.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Banandur, P.; Shahane, S.; Velu, S.; Bhargav, S.; Thakkar, A.; Hasiruvalli Gangappa, V.; Naik, V.; Arelingaiah, M.; Garady, L.; Koujageri, J.; et al. Health and Lifestyle, Safety, Relationship and Personality Factors Influence Gender, Sex and Sexuality Issues among Youth—A Case Record Analysis from Youth Mental Health Promotion Clinics in Karnataka, India. Sexes 2021, 2, 483-494. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sexes2040038

AMA Style

Banandur P, Shahane S, Velu S, Bhargav S, Thakkar A, Hasiruvalli Gangappa V, Naik V, Arelingaiah M, Garady L, Koujageri J, et al. Health and Lifestyle, Safety, Relationship and Personality Factors Influence Gender, Sex and Sexuality Issues among Youth—A Case Record Analysis from Youth Mental Health Promotion Clinics in Karnataka, India. Sexes. 2021; 2(4):483-494. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sexes2040038

Chicago/Turabian Style

Banandur, Pradeep, Swati Shahane, Sathya Velu, Sathrajith Bhargav, Aditi Thakkar, Virupaksha Hasiruvalli Gangappa, Vani Naik, Mutharaju Arelingaiah, Lavanya Garady, Jyoti Koujageri, and et al. 2021. "Health and Lifestyle, Safety, Relationship and Personality Factors Influence Gender, Sex and Sexuality Issues among Youth—A Case Record Analysis from Youth Mental Health Promotion Clinics in Karnataka, India" Sexes 2, no. 4: 483-494. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/sexes2040038

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop