Next Article in Journal
Effects of Ashwagandha (Withania somnifera) on Physical Performance: Systematic Review and Bayesian Meta-Analysis
Previous Article in Journal
Regional Differences in Biceps Femoris Long Head Stiffness during Isometric Knee Flexion
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Moving Mindfully: The Role of Mindfulness Practice in Physical Activity and Health Behaviours

Health Research Hub, DR ACADEMY, Melbourne, Victoria 3011, Australia
J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2021, 6(1), 19; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jfmk6010019
Submission received: 15 January 2021 / Revised: 28 January 2021 / Accepted: 4 February 2021 / Published: 10 February 2021

Abstract

:
Participation in regular physical activity yields numerous psychological and physical health benefits. Despite this, a large proportion of the global population is increasingly becoming inactive and sedentary, which has been linked to various causes of morbidity and mortality. One practice that has been found to encourage healthy participation in physical activity and associated health behaviours is mindfulness. Mindfulness practices have been consistently linked to higher levels of physical activity participation. However, the relationship between mindfulness practices and physical activity remains ambiguous. This present paper comments on the role of mindfulness practice in physical activity and health behaviours. Implications for future research and practice have also been addressed.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Research has consistently linked engaging in regular physical activity (PA) with a wide range of positive health outcomes and well-being [1,2]. Despite the evidence and continued public health campaigns to promote PA in the general population [3], recent trends indicate an increase in levels of physical inactivity and sedentarism [2,4,5]. Given physical inactivity and sedentary behaviours have been found to be associated with high levels of global morbidity and mortality, there is an insistent need to motivate people to increase the amount of PA they undertake [6,7,8].
Although studies examining participation motivation in PA have highlighted key reasons people nominate for engaging in different types of PA [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14], suitable interventions are yet to be developed and implemented that would use this knowledge effectively. Research indicates that lifestyle interventions that were intended to increase the levels of PA only resulted in ordinary changes in marked behaviours [15,16,17,18], along with limited long-term outcomes [19,20,21]. Moreover, such interventions were found to have low adherence and high dropout rates in the short [22] and long term [23,24].
Novel interventions are, therefore, required that would not only help understand the mechanisms of successful PA behaviour change but also address the barriers to PA that typically affect PA uptake, maintenance, and adherence. In recent years, mindfulness practices have garnered significant attention in the literature, predominantly because of their salutary health benefits and public acceptance [25,26]. Moreover, mindfulness practices have also received greater emphasis due to their potential to address barriers to change [27]. The purpose of this paper is to briefly describe mindfulness and examine its relationship with PA and health behaviours.

2. Mindfulness

During the past two decades, interest in mindfulness practices has skyrocketed in the scientific literature and public domain. Despite this, accurate representation and scientific examination of mindfulness and its correlates have been ambiguous and indefinite. Mindfulness, stripped of its original foundational orientation, has now been commodified and repurposed as a magical panacea for different types of human conditions and ailments, which has muddled the understanding of mindfulness practices and created methodological issues in determining their purpose and potential psychophysiological benefits (e.g., [28,29]).
Mindfulness emerged as a meditative practice thousands of years ago in the Vedic traditions of Hinduism in ancient India. It forms a critical element in Eastern traditional and spiritual philosophies and is cultivated through rigorous training [25,26,28]. Yet, acceptance of mindfulness practices has only recently entered the parlance in the Western context. Mindfulness, in the West, has been simply characterized as the ability to pay moment-to-moment and non-judgmental attention. Roychowdhury [25] argues that although it would be nearly impossible to encapsulate the essence of mindfulness, there are three fundamental concepts that lie at its core:
(a)
Present-moment awareness: an individual’s ability to focus attention in the here and now
(b)
Equanimity: an individual’s ability to maintain a sense of balance between helpful and unhelpful thoughts, emotions, and/or sensations
(c)
Non-doing: an individual’s ability to allow life to unfold extemporaneously

3. Mindfulness, Physical Activity, and Health Outcomes

There is a substantial amount of research linking the efficaciousness of mindfulness to a range of physical and psychological health outcomes. Studies examining the associations among mindfulness, PA, and health behaviours have concluded that higher levels of mindfulness lead to higher levels of PA [30,31,32], self-efficacy [24], positive emotions [33,34], healthy eating [31,35], better quality of sleep [30,31,35,36], satisfaction [37], and well-being [38]. Conversely, it was also found that individuals who were successful at maintaining PA tended to score higher on measures of mindfulness [39] and that participation in a single session of mindful PA was shown to positively alter individuals’ mood [40]. Furthermore, Zvolensky and colleagues [41] examined the role of mindfulness-based attention in predicting perceived health status and functioning in a community sample of young adults and found that greater levels of mindfulness-based attention were associated with perceptions of better physical and psychological functioning.
Research on mindfulness practices have indicated that engaging in mindfulness-based behaviours increases adaptive and inhibits maladaptive health behaviours. For instance, it has been found that individuals who scored higher on mindfulness measures reported lower levels of substance use, smoking, binge eating, and risky sexual behaviours (e.g., [30,35,42,43,44]). It is, therefore, evident that mindfulness practices facilitate involvement in positive and healthy behaviours whilst simultaneously inhibiting participation in negative or unhealthy behaviours.

4. Discussion

The profoundly positive effect of mindfulness on a range of PA and health behaviours is widely documented in the literature (e.g., [30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39]). It is evident that individuals with higher scores on mindfulness measures tend to engage in adaptive and healthy behaviours and report better physical and psychological functioning (e.g., [30,31,32]). Despite the evidence, the mechanisms underlying mindfulness practices and how they enable engagement in PA and health behaviours are relatively unclear.
The perplexity surrounding the semantics and conceptualization of mindfulness in research and practice renders it arduous to define, observe, and measure. Additionally, as research on mindfulness has increasingly saturated the scientific literature and public discourse, the characterization and subsequent utilization of mindfulness has attracted warranted debate and criticisms (e.g., [26,28]). For instance, mindfulness practices have often been misattributed to Buddhism, despite evidence that these practices originated in Hindu philosophy that pre-date Buddhist teachings by thousands of years [28]. Furthermore, it has been argued that the commodification of contemporary mindfulness as a magical panacea not only serves capitalistic endeavours but may also prove detrimental for individuals with certain psycho-medical conditions and/or who do not have proper training in such practices [26,28,29]. Considering the description and classification of mindfulness in the literature coupled with public discussion has largely been unsystematic and unidimensional, future research should focus on developing a comprehensive and holistic understanding of mindfulness, both in theory and practice.
Future research should investigate how mindfulness mechanisms enable and maintain PA participation and healthy behavioural choices. For instance, the cultivation of present-moment awareness may enable individuals to focus on relevant PA tasks in the present moment. Moreover, the process of equanimity may allow individuals to choose and maintain healthy PA behaviours without being swayed by unhelpful or unwanted thoughts, distractions, and/or sensations. Finally, practicing non-doing perhaps trains individuals to allow their growth to happen in due course, without having to rush their participation or progress in PA. It is likely that these core mindfulness processes (of present-moment awareness, equanimity, and non-doing) foster a sense of attention, acceptance, and calmness that creates an open and healthy orientation and attitude towards PA whilst simultaneously inhibiting unhelpful and unwanted distractions and habitual tendencies, thereby creating a healthy sense of agency and self-control. A state of mindfulness may assist individuals to focus on their PA by becoming more attuned to the activity at hand, observing their thoughts, and being less reactive to unwanted or unhelpful thoughts or emotions. This may be especially pertinent when engaging in or maintaining PA becomes particularly arduous (e.g., uncomfortable sensations or pain, task/PA complexity, goal-ambiguity, and judgement of self or others). Thus, it is plausible that mindfulness practices succor individuals to cultivate self-monitoring, self-control, and persistence skills. Therefore, increased mindfulness training and heightened awareness are likely to support self-regulatory mechanisms that are ultimately responsible for PA behaviours. Future research and practice in this domain should examine the mechanisms underlying mindfulness practices and how they promote healthy PA behaviours and inhibit unhealthy or risky actions.
It is evident from the literature that higher levels of mindfulness promote healthy engagement in PA (e.g., [30,31,32]) and that individuals who are involved in regular forms of PA tend to score higher on measures of mindfulness (e.g., [39]). Despite the symbiotic relationship between mindfulness and PA, the direction of this relationship still remains unclear. It is plausible that more mindful individuals—due to their open, aware, and accepting orientation—tend to prioritize healthy behaviours (such as PA involvement) over others. Likewise, it is conceivable that engaging in healthy behaviours (such as regular PA), which yield salutary psychophysiological benefits, tend to make individuals more mindful about their choices–consequences outcome (i.e., choosing to consciously participate in PA to obtain health benefits). Considering the health benefits and reciprocity of mindfulness practices and PA behaviours, more research is warranted in this domain.
Mindfulness practices and healthy PA behaviours are both cultivated through disciplined training. That is, with precise preparation and sustained efforts, individuals move from a novice state to a more grounded and experienced form. It must be noted that such mindful efforts and PA behaviours take time to cultivate and are affected by myriad internal and external dynamics. Therefore, understanding the temporal, contextual, and existential dimensions in which such behaviours subsist is crucial to understanding the relationship between mindfulness practices and healthy PA behaviours and how they affect the behaviour change process.
Future research and practice in this context should examine mindfulness practices across a wide range of populations, cultures, and behaviours to ascertain the mechanisms and processes that characterize participation in different types of PA. Similarly, the relationship between people who tend to engage in regular PA and their form of mindfulness must also be explored to determine how healthy behaviours promote a state of mindfulness in individuals. These have huge implications for the global population that is increasingly becoming physically inactive and sedentary. Understanding what makes individuals more mindful and encourages them to engage in different types of PA will ultimately aid health researchers and practitioners to develop and implement targeted campaigns to increase population mindfulness and the amount of PA people undertake, which will enhance satisfaction and well-being and help tackle a number of lifestyle-related ailments.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Author Biography

Dev Roychowdhury is a researcher, pracademic, and consultant in mindfulness, motivation, mental health, and performance psychology. He is currently serving as the Research Director at DR ACADEMY and Executive Member of Managing Council of the Asian South-Pacific Association of Sport Psychology. He obtained his doctoral degree in psychology in Australia and has extensive lecturing, research, and industry experience. Dev Roychowdhury has lectured at Monash University and Victoria University in Australia and served as a uniformed and commissioned Army Officer in the Australian Defence Force. He takes keen interest in research and is regularly invited to conduct seminars and workshops. For more information, please visit https://www.drdevroy.com.

References

  1. Motion for Your Mind: Physical Activity for Mental Health Promotion, Protection and Care. Available online: https://www.euro.who.int/__data/assets/pdf_file/0018/403182/WHO-Motion-for-your-mind-ENG.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2021).
  2. Roychowdhury, D. Using physical activity to enhance health outcomes across the life span. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2020, 5, 2. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Buckworth, J.; Dishman, R.; O’Connor, P.; Tomporowski, P. Exercise Psychology, 2nd ed.; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Guthold, R.; Stevens, G.; Riley, L.; Bull, F. Worldwide trends in insufficient physical activity from 2001 to 2016: A pooled analysis of 358 population-based surveys with 1.9 million participants. Lancet Glob. Health 2018, 6, e1077–e1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Hamilton, M.; Healy, G.; Dunstan, D.; Zderic, T.; Owen, N. Too little exercise and too much sitting: Inactivity physiology and the need for new recommendations on sedentary behavior. Curr. Cardiovasc. Risk Rep. 2008, 2, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Morris, T.; Roychowdhury, D. Physical activity for health and wellbeing: The role of motives for participation. Health Psychol. Rep. 2020, 8, 391–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Roychowdhury, D. Examining Reasons for Participation in Sport and Exercise Using the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS). Ph.D. Thesis, Victoria University, Melbourne, Australia, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  8. Roychowdhury, D. Motivation in Physical Activity. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Psychology in the Real World, 1st ed.; Shapiro, J., Ed.; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2021; in press. [Google Scholar]
  9. Morris, T.; Roychowdhury, D. Motives for Participation in Physical Activity: Measurement, Prediction, and Profiling. In Proceedings of the 14th European Federation of Sport Psychology, Bern, Switzerland, 14–19 July 2015. [Google Scholar]
  10. Morris, T.; Roychowdhury, D.; Khoo, S. Applying Motivational Profiling in Sport and Physical Activity. In Proceedings of the 15th European Congress of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Munster, Germany, 15–20 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  11. Roychowdhury, D. A comprehensive measure of participation motivation: Examining and validating the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale (PALMS). J. Hum. Sport Exerc. 2018, 13, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Roychowdhury, D. Functional significance of participation motivation on physical activity involvement. Psychol. Thought 2018, 11, 9–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Roychowdhury, D. Motivational Approaches in Promoting Physical Activity Involvement. In Proceedings of the 15th European Congress of Sport and Exercise Psychology, Munster, Germany, 15–20 July 2019. [Google Scholar]
  14. Roychowdhury, D.; Morris, T. Examining Participation Motivation in Sport and Exercise Using Discriminant Function Analyses. In Proceedings of the 13th International Society of Sport Psychology World Congress, Beijing, China, 21–26 July 2013. [Google Scholar]
  15. Conn, V.; Hafdahl, A.; Mehr, D. Interventions to increase physical activity among healthy adults: Meta-analysis of outcomes. Am. J. Public Health 2011, 101, 751–758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Lemmens, V.; Oenema, A.; Klepp, K.; Henriksen, H.; Brug, J. A systematic review of the evidence regarding efficacy of obesity prevention interventions among adults. Obes. Rev. 2008, 9, 446–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  17. Metcalf, B.; Henley, W.; Wilkin, T. Effectiveness of intervention on physical activity of children: Systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials with objectively measured outcomes (EarlyBird 54). BMJ 2012, 345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Rhodes, R.; Pfaeffli, L. Mediators of physical activity behaviour change among adult non-clinical populations: A review update. Int. J. Behav. Nutr. Phys. Act. 2010, 7, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Fjeldsoe, B.; Neuhaus, M.; Winkler, E.; Eakin, E. Systematic review of maintenance of behavior change following physical activity and dietary interventions. Health Psychol. 2011, 30, 99–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shaya, F.; Flores, D.; Gbarayor, C.; Wang, J. School-based obesity interventions: A literature review. J. Sch. Health 2008, 78, 189–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  21. Wing, R.; Hill, J. Successful weight loss maintenance. Annu. Rev. Nutr. 2001, 21, 323–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Dishman, R.; Heath, G.; Lee, I. Physical Activity Epidemiology; Human Kinetics: Champaign, IL, USA, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  23. Blue, C.; Black, D. Synthesis of intervention research to modify physical activity and dietary behaviors. Res. Theory Nurs. Pract. 2005, 19, 25–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Gilbert, D.; Waltz, J. Mindfulness and health behaviors. Mindfulness 2010, 1, 227–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Roychowdhury, D. Understanding Mindfulness in Sport, Exercise, and Performance Psychology. In Routledge Encyclopedia of Psychology in the Real World, 1st ed.; Shapiro, J., Ed.; Routledge: Oxfordshire, UK, 2021; in press. [Google Scholar]
  26. Roychowdhury, D.; Ronkainen, N.; Guinto, M. The Transnational Migration of Mindfulness: A Call for Reflective Pause in Sport and Exercise Psychology. Psychol. Sport Exerc. 2021. accepted pending revisions. [Google Scholar]
  27. Hayes, S. Acceptance and commitment therapy, relational frame theory, and the third wave of behavioral and cognitive therapies. Behav. Ther. 2004, 35, 639–665. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Roychowdhury, D. Mindfulness: Spiritual Transcendence or Neoliberal Scam. Available online: https://www.drdevroy.com/mindfulness-x2/ (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  29. Van Dam, N.; van Vugt, M.; Vago, D.; Schmalzl, L.; Saron, C.; Olendzki, A.; Meissnert, T.; Lazar, S.; Kerr, C.; Gorchov, J.; et al. Mind the hype: A critical evaluation and prescriptive agenda for research on mindfulness and meditation. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 2017, 13, 36–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Roberts, K.; Danoff-Burg, S. Mindfulness and health behaviors: Is paying attention good for you? J. Am. Coll. Health 2010, 59, 165–173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Sala, M.; Rochefort, C.; Lui, P.; Baldwin, A. Trait mindfulness and health behaviours: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. Rev. 2019, 14, 345–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Tapper, K.; Shaw, C.; Ilsley, J.; Hill, A.; Bond, F.; Moore, L. Exploratory randomised controlled trial of a mindfulness-based weight loss intervention for women. Appetite 2009, 52, 396–404. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Greenberg, J.; Meiran, N. Is mindfulness meditation associated with “feeling less?”. Mindfulness 2013, 5, 471–476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Jislin-Goldberg, T.; Tanay, G.; Bernstein, A. Mindfulness and positive affect: Cross-sectional, prospective intervention, and real-time relations. J. Posit. Psychol. 2012, 7, 349–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Murphy, M.; Mermelstein, L.; Edwards, K.; Gidycz, C. The benefits of dispositional mindfulness in physical health: A longitudinal study of female college students. J. Am. Coll. Health 2012, 60, 341–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Bogusch, L.; Fekete, E.; Skinta, M. Anxiety and depressive symptoms as mediators of trait mindfulness and sleep quality in emerging adults. Mindfulness 2016, 7, 962–970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Tsafou, K.; De Ridder, D.; van Ee, R.; Lacroix, J. Mindfulness and satisfaction in physical activity: A cross-sectional study in the Dutch population. J. Health Psychol. 2016, 21, 1817–1827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Brown, K.; Ryan, R. The benefits of being present: Mindfulness and its role in psychological well-being. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 84, 822–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Ulmer, C.; Stetson, B.; Salmon, P. Mindfulness and acceptance are associated with exercise maintenance in YMCA exercisers. Behav. Res. Ther. 2010, 48, 805–809. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Netz, Y.; Lidor, R. Mood alterations in mindful versus aerobic exercise modes. J. Psychol. 2003, 137, 405–419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Zvolensky, M.; Solomon, S.; McLeish, A.; Cassidy, D.; Bernstein, A.; Bowman, C.; Yartz, A. Incremental validity of mindfulness-based attention in relation to the concurrent prediction of anxiety and depressive symptomatology and perceptions of health. Cogn. Behav. Ther. 2006, 35, 148–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  42. Black, D.; Sussman, S.; Johnson, C.; Milam, J. Trait mindfulness helps shield decision-making from translating into health-risk behavior. J. Adolesc. Health 2012, 51, 588–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  43. Davis, J.; Fleming, M.; Bonus, K.; Baker, T. A pilot study on mindfulness-based stress reduction for smokers. BMC Complement Altern. Med. 2007, 7, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  44. Martelli, A. The Role of Mindfulness in the Regulation of Behavior Among Those Prone to Negative Urgency (Dissertation). Master’s Thesis, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Roychowdhury, D. Moving Mindfully: The Role of Mindfulness Practice in Physical Activity and Health Behaviours. J. Funct. Morphol. Kinesiol. 2021, 6, 19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jfmk6010019

AMA Style

Roychowdhury D. Moving Mindfully: The Role of Mindfulness Practice in Physical Activity and Health Behaviours. Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology. 2021; 6(1):19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jfmk6010019

Chicago/Turabian Style

Roychowdhury, Dev. 2021. "Moving Mindfully: The Role of Mindfulness Practice in Physical Activity and Health Behaviours" Journal of Functional Morphology and Kinesiology 6, no. 1: 19. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jfmk6010019

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop