Next Article in Journal
Optimal Temperature-Based Condition Monitoring System for Wind Turbines
Next Article in Special Issue
BAT Algorithm-Based ANN to Predict the Compressive Strength of Concrete—A Comparative Study
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Additives in Soil-Cement Subjected to Wetting-Drying Cycles
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Selection Criteria for Building Materials and Components in Line with the Circular Economy Principles in the Built Environment—A Review of Current Trends

by
Kamel Mohamed Rahla
1,2,*,
Ricardo Mateus
1,2 and
Luís Bragança
1,2
1
Institute for Sustainability and Innovation in Structural Engineering (ISISE), University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimaraes, Portugal
2
Civil Engineering Department, School of Engineering, University of Minho, 4800-058 Guimaraes, Portugal
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 21 January 2021 / Revised: 8 March 2021 / Accepted: 19 March 2021 / Published: 24 March 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Sustainability of Building Materials and Structures)

Abstract

:
A growing concern is given to the environmental impacts caused by the construction industry. Waste generation, resource consumption, and greenhouse gas emissions are the main drawbacks of the rapid urbanization that the world is witnessing. As a response to these pressing issues, policymakers and academia are exploring the concept of Circular Economy (CE) to manage resources better and achieve resource efficiency while eliminating waste. One of the strategies to implement CE in the built environment is to select the appropriate building materials and components from the early stages to carry out the concept’s principles along the value chain and create a closed-loop system. Therefore, this study aims at identifying selection criteria for building elements according to CE principles through a review of the latest research. Results have shown that little has been concretely achieved in terms of a paradigm shift to CE since the main focus of the literature is still the use of recycled products and the recyclability of building materials and components at their end-of-life. Although the present study is solely focused on the technical aspect of building materials and components, it outlines current adopted criteria to bring about a circular built environment and highlights the need for a more innovative approach to attain higher circularity levels.

1. Introduction

The construction industry has been an essential sector for humans as it provides the necessary infrastructures, buildings, jobs and economic prosperity [1]. Nevertheless, with the rapid urbanization that the world is facing, the building sector is imposing severe environmental impacts on the planet [2]. This accounts for more than a third of the waste generated, emissions, and materials consumption [3]. In the long run, this would create a global issue of materials scarcity as the consumption rates would exceed the regeneration rates of resources [4,5].
In this context, the concept of Circular Economy (CE) came into broad recognition by policymakers in Europe, to urge the industry to shift its linear consumption pattern to a circular one wherein the economic progress does not threaten the ecosystems [6,7]. The concept encourages more proper and efficient use of renewable resources while considering waste as a resource that could be put back into the economy in a closed-loop system.
Although the built environment represents a significant opportunity to embrace the CE, the literature regarding the topic is still emerging and mainly theoretical [8]. The challenge lies in the fact that the industry has been following the same economic model with little to no consideration of the end-of-life stage of consumed materials. Several studies have already tackled the topic of selecting adequate construction materials from a triple bottom line perspective to ensure a balance between the environment, economy, and society [9]. However, so far, not a single study has undertaken the critical factor of materials selection from a technical perspective according to the CE principles. As such, this study will review the current literature regarding CE practices related to construction materials to identify and analyze the materials selection criteria that are being followed to support the adoption of CE principles in the construction sector. In this article, the term built environment describes all the elements of our surroundings that are human-made, such as buildings and infrastructures [10], whilst the terms “material” and “components” refer to all the building elements which constitutes the built environment, taking into account the concept of Buildings As Material Banks, which is a framework that aims at implementing the CE in buildings by reducing the virgin materials input, increasing buildings flexibility and adaptability, and designing out waste [11].
Given that the article’s objective is to discern materials criteria from literature, it is structured in five sections. Section 2 reviews the origins and the idea behind the CE, the adoption of the concept’s principles in the built environment, and answers why and how materials selection is important for implementing circularity in the built environment. Section 3 describes the methodology of the study. Section 4 presents the literature review results, while Section 5 discusses the outcomes, and explains the trends of materials selection encountered in literature. Finally, Section 6 presents the conclusion of the study, provides further recommendations, and outlines the limitations of this study.

2. Background and Context

2.1. The Concept of CE

In response to the current predominant pattern of the linear economy, which consists in an “extract, make, use, dispose” model, the concept of CE was elaborated to provide a durable and sustainable resolution to distinguish economic prosperity from environmental damage [12]. Scholars, practitioners, and policymakers have demonstrated, mainly throughout the last decade, a great interest in applying the concept’s principles into sectors that imposed heavy impacts on the environment. Nonetheless, originally the work of Kenneth Boulding entitled “The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth” [13], initiated the idea of closed systems with finite resources. From thereon, numerous studies tackled the pressing issue of adverse environmental impacts resulting from economic welfare. In 1990, the environmental economists, Pearce and Turner introduced the term “Circular Economy” to describe a pattern wherein materials are kept in use and waste is designed out [14]. In recent years, the CE gained more attention with the creation of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation (EMF). The latter stated that the CE is rooted in several schools of thought such as: Regenerative Design, Performance Economy, Industrial Ecology, and Cradle to Cradle [15].
Up to now, there is no global consensus when it comes to defining the CE concept accurately. Kirchherr et al. [16] analyzed 114 definitions of the CE to provide transparency to its current comprehension. The authors concluded that the CE concept might face incoherence and eventually breakdown or “remain in a deadlock” as many conflicts were found in those definitions. The authors ultimately defined the studied paradigm as “An economic system that replaces the ‘end-of-life’ concept with reducing, alternatively reusing, recycling and recovering materials in production/distribution and consumption processes. It operates at the micro-level (products, companies, consumers), meso-level (eco-industrial parks) and macro-level (city, region, nation and beyond), to accomplish sustainable development, thus simultaneously creating environmental quality, economic prosperity and social equity, to the benefit of current and future generations. It is enabled by novel business models and responsible consumers” [16]. Preston [17] argued that a lack of an acknowledged definition might challenge future international cooperation. Currently, the most used and well-known definition of the CE is stipulated by EMF as:
An industrial system that is restorative or regenerative by intention and design. It replaces the ’end-of-life’ concept with restoration, shifts towards the use of renewable energy, eliminates the use of toxic chemicals, which impair reuse, and aims for the elimination of waste through the superior design of materials, products, systems, and, within this, business models”.
[18]
Nevertheless, a recent study regarding CE indicators for cultural heritage buildings, defined CE in a more comprehensive manner as: “…a production and consumption process that requires the minimum overall natural resource extraction and environmental impact by extending the use of materials and reducing the consumption and waste of materials and energy. The useful life of materials is extended through trans formation into new products, design for longevity, waste minimization, and recovery/reuse, and redefining consumption to include sharing and services provision instead of individual ownership. A CE emphasizes the use of renewable, non-toxic, and biodegradable materials with the lowest possible life-cycle impacts. As a sustainability concept, a CE must be embedded in a social structure that pro- motes human well-being for all within the biophysical limits of the planet Earth” [19].

2.2. CE Principles in the Built Environment

As previously mentioned, the CE concept entails several schools of thought and ideas which complicates the application of its core principles. In literature, the CE principles mainly arise as the 3Rs principle, especially from a Chinese perspective, commonly summarized in its principles to Reduce; Reuse, and Recycle. “Reduce” point out to the action of decreasing the inputs (primary energy and raw materials) and outputs (wastes) to achieve eco-efficiency, while minimizing the consumption rates. “Reuse” means “any operation by which products or components that are not waste are used again for the same purpose for which they were conceived” [20]. In contrast, Su et al. [21] referred to "reuse" as an act of using by-products and wastes generated by industries as inputs to other industries as well as extending the life-use of products by maintenance or remanufacture. “Recycle” implies "any recovery operation by which waste materials are reprocessed into products, materials or substances whether for the original or other purposes. It includes the reprocessing of organic material but does not include energy recovery and the reprocessing into materials that are to be used as fuels or for backfilling operations [20]. It incites the industries to process wastes while manufacturing new products to reduce the dependence on virgin materials and minimizing the quantity of materials disposed or landfilled which will, consequently, decrease the environmental burdens [9,21,22,23,24]. The 3Rs principle follows a “hierarchical importance”, as the action of “reducing” comes first as the main principle when adopting CE [21]. It is commonly perceived that CE is linked to “Recycle”, but the proper approach to reach material efficiency and generate benefits in both economic and environmental is to give priority to the “Reduction” and “Reuse" of waste [9].
The 3Rs approach was recently expanded to include more actions to transit from a linear economy to a circular one (Table 1). The “R-list” shows the circularity strategies that are more suitable to embrace CE by a priority order [25].
The EMF highlighted three principles for the CE, first, to keep materials in use and at their highest value for as long as possible by relying on the technical and biological cycles, second, to maintain and improve the natural capital by using renewable resources, and third, to adopt a holistic perspective by designing out waste. Similarly, the European commission has released a report entitled “Circular Economy principles for buildings design” [26] which is a document aligned with the assessment methodology Level(s) to identify relevant aspects to be considered to reach the aim of resource-efficiency and CE implementation at the material level. Three approaches have been highlighted and addressed according to the target audience, which are adaptability and service-life extension, waste reduction, and durability. The latter aspect has also been substantiated by several studies as a crucial factor by stressing the need for high-quality and durable materials to transition towards a circular built environment [27,28,29,30,31].These principles can be translated into practice as a better and wiser use of construction materials that are sustainably sourced or recovered, implementing collaboration across the built environment’s value chain, and planning the end-of-life scenario of buildings and materials.
Merging the CE principles with the construction sector offers significant opportunities for reductions in energy use, greenhouse gas emissions, and waste production and improves the global construction industry productivity [8]. Cheshire [32] claimed that circular thinking means redefining waste as a resource to keep materials in use and their value retained. This approach can reduce costs to protect companies against unstable prices related to raw materials while providing more supply security. Gálvez-Martos et al. [33] argued that implementing the core principles of CE in the management of construction demolition waste could drastically minimize the environmental impact and improve resource efficiency by: reducing waste generation, minimizing transport impacts, maximizing reuse and recycling by enhancing the quality of secondary materials and optimizing the environmental performance of treatment methods. The EU action plan on closing the loops to transit towards CE [34] prioritized five sectors, and one of them is the “construction and demolition” waste. At this level, the priorities rely on setting recycling protocols for construction and demolition waste and adopting eco-design to boost competitiveness and minimizing waste generation.

2.3. The Relevance of Materials Selection for Embedding CE in the Built Environment

At the core of the built environment, construction materials play an essential role in defining the built environment’s vision. In some cases, selecting the best suitable construction materials from a CE perspective would attain higher sustainability levels by reducing the environmental impacts, lowering the costs of materials, and increasing collaboration across the value chain among other benefits [35,36]. Still, overall sustainability performances of construction materials, that match the CE thinking, require meticulous research to designate the perfect balance between circularity and sustainability [37].
Pomponi and Moncaster [8] outlined the CE in the built environment in three levels where they positioned materials as the micro level due to their ability to introduce the concept from its roots whilst involving less complexity in the process of embedding the CE principles.
The current attempts to reduce the impacts of buildings during the use phase has emphasized the embodied impacts carried by materials as they account for more than half of the total life cycle impacts [38], which evince that construction materials hold the potential of lowering overall embodied impacts of buildings right from the early stages. Designers, project managers, and different construction actors can decide CE applications [39]. In sustainable construction, the selection of materials has been established as a crucial step to integrate the sustainability principles into buildings projects [40]. Nassar et al. [41] stated that during the design stage, selecting the proper building materials will influence the building’s performance depending on the design criteria that has been chosen. Milani et al. [42] relied on the multiple criteria decision making and life cycle assessment to provide a comparative study and select the most favorable composite material according to its environmental, economic and technical performances.
As CE and sustainability concepts may overlap in some aspects, previous studies have partially examined which CE principles are already embodied in sustainability criteria. Akadiri and Olomolaiye [43] highlighted the need for a framework that identifies sustainable building materials and developed an assessment criteria to select the best materials based on sustainability principles. Among the prioritized criteria, the authors relied on recyclable and reusable materials, used waste, durability, and safe disposal scenarios. Simultaneously, maintainability stood out as one of the most significant indicators that must be considered while selecting building materials along the design process [43]. Jeanjean et al. [44] argued that the improvement of the building envelops by materials selection according to their thermal performances will tackle potential environmental issues at a lower cost. The experimental research concluded that using a building material with recycled content presented the best results according to the selected criteria. Likewise, Govindan et al. [45] proposed a set of indicators for materials selection from a sustainability perspective in the United Arab Emirates (UAE) context using a multicriteria decision-making method. They established that, according to the experts’ opinion, the most significant criterion for the study was "Potential for recycling and reuse". In the same context, Mahmoudkelaye et al. [46] presented a model of materials selection that went beyond the triple bottom line and included the cultural and technical aspects to provide a holistic approach to the process. Still with little regard for the material’s end-of-life, since the only relevant indicator for this aspect was “reuse and recycling”. Pedersen Zari [47] used an ecosystem services approach to underline the best suitable materials to decrease the construction industry’s harmful environmental impacts. One of the adopted strategies was the “Nutrient cycling” which emphasizes the reuse and recycling of finite earth elements. Reddy et al. [48] investigated the challenge of selecting proper sustainable construction materials by developing the “Sustainable Material Performance Index” based on three construction stages. One of the indicators that the authors relied on was recyclability, which can define the material’s end-of-life scenario.
Therefore, to ensure an optimal CE implementation in the built environment, a wise materials selection is crucial for the construction project. Eberhardt et al. [49] claim that the second most popular strategy to implement CE in buildings is materials selection. Despite the comprehensive studies that explored Circular construction materials, a lack of criteria identification linked to CE principles remains overlooked.
In this context, the following research will attempt to classify the CE technical aspects of building materials that have been studied by academia to identify critical trends linked to the CE. Based on the background knowledge described in this section, the technical criteria that will be considered in this study are recycled or recovered content, recyclability, reusability, ease of deconstruction, durability, maintainability, upcycling potential, energy recoverability, and biodegradability.

3. Materials and Methods

To ascertain the trends of current studies which related construction materials and components practices, a review was carried out between November and December 2020 using the keywords “Circular”, “economy”, “Construction”, “Building”, “Materials”, in two different databases, namely Scopus and Web of Science. The reason for considering these two is that they are considered the most exhaustive databases [50] (Figure 1). The language selected was English, and only papers published during the last six years are considered. Due to the number of publications that have been found, the review will only consider journal articles. Preliminary results were 159 articles in Scopus and 120 in Web of Science. After that, duplicates have been disregarded, and screening has been performed for titles, abstracts, and keywords to determine relevant journal articles concerning this study’s scope. Finally, 131 selected journal articles were eligible for full-text read, and the results are presented in the next section.

4. Results

4.1. Temporal Analysis

Apart from the current year, the amount of publication has substantially increased since 2015 (Figure 2), which implies a growing interest from academia in the CE topic. This phenomenon can be explained by the fact that several governmental and non-governmental agencies are releasing reports and action plans (e.g., [51,52,53]) which has enabled a more significant concern to translate the circular thinking into the construction sector to support the sustainable development further.

4.2. Spatial Analysis

The spatial analysis of the selected literature was done according to the first author’s affiliation (Figure 3). The analysis indicates the dominance of the European research output in CE. Over 70% of the publications were from European countries where Spain, Italy, and the UK came in the top three with 22, 17, and 10 publications, respectively. This is due to the numerous EU funded projects that investigated CE in the built environment (e.g., BAMB) and the collaboration developed across the continent in addition to the release of the CE action plan by the European Commission in 2015 and 2020 [26,52]. Asia came second in terms of publications with over 15% followed by North America (6%), Oceania (5%), South America (2%), and Africa (2%).

4.3. Source Analysis

Out of the 51 journals where the selected literature has been published (Figure 4), the “Journal of Cleaner Production” came first in terms of publications related to the topic with a total of 32 articles, followed by “Resources, Conservation, and Recycling” with 15 articles, and “Sustainability” with 11 articles. These journals have been publishing considerable scientific research regarding the domain of CE. The other main scopes of the remaining journals are waste, environmental research, structures, architecture, buildings, energy, and materials.

4.4. Identified CE Criteria for Building Materials and Components

After a thorough analysis of the eligible research articles (see Table A1), a total of nine CE strategies has been identified and categorized as shown in Table 2 and illustrated in Figure 5. The most followed criterion was “Recycled or recovered content” as over 80% of articles have discussed the possibility of incorporating recycled or recovered content into materials and components to cut down the use of virgin materials into new products. The large majority of these articles have studied the use of secondary materials into concrete/mortars as aggregates or cement replacements, at specific ratios, and concluded that the approach met the minimal requirements while reducing the associated environmental impacts [54]. The second and third most adopted strategy are “recyclability” and “reusability”, considered by over 60% and 50% of the papers, respectively. The “recyclability” approach requires a process to prepare the waste to be used in new building material or component while “reusability” means extending their service life without a particular treatment. Considering the principles of closed-loop systems, around 25% of literature referred to materials and components that hold the ability to be easily deconstructed, which promotes reversibility in the built environment [55]. Despite being often highlighted in sustainability-related practices, the “durability” criterion was only mentioned in 15% of the articles. Current literature has neglected this important aspect, which directly correlates with the quality and performance of materials and components over time. Following the 9R’s hierarchy (Table 1), “Energy recoverability” should be considered the last scenario for building elements before landfill. Over 10% of literature envisaged incineration to building products to recover energy and convert it to fuel, heat, and electricity. The “maintainability” englobes the actions of repairing, maintenance, and refurbishing building components to ensure optimal performances. However, only around 10% of articles have tackled this criterion. The last two criteria, “upcycling potential” and “biodegradability” are covered by very few articles because current construction practices are far from embracing such strategies on a large global scale.

5. Discussion

The objective of this study was to determine the technical criteria of building materials and components adopted by academia under CE principles. Other environmental, economic, social criteria such as embodied carbon, maintenance cost, and aesthetics were not considered to provide a more in-depth focus on technical-related features. The nine identified CE criteria covered three facets: type of input, the use phase, and the end-of-life scenario. The type of input included only one criterion, “recycled or recovered content” which implies using recycled or recovered materials from other sources into the manufacturing of a new construction material. “Durability” and “Maintainability” are two criteria that suggest building materials or components that hold the potential of longer life-service. The end-of-life scenarios include the remaining CE criteria which are: “Recyclability”, “Reusability”, “Ease of Deconstruction”, “Upcycle potential”, “biodegradability” and “energy recoverability” as the least favored option to avoid landfill.
The conducted research about incorporating waste or by-product into building materials was already widely accepted within the frameworks of waste management and resource efficiency. With the emergence of CE, these practices have intensified, and several studies have further investigated the use of secondary materials into concrete [139], bricks [70], ceramics [60], steel [61], polymers [118] and road pavements [146].
During the use phase of materials and components, durability and maintainability are considered reliable criteria to distinguish higher longevity [29]. Numerous studies have stressed the significance of durability to implement CE principles that have to be taken into account during the design phase [27,28,132]. Durable and high-quality building elements can endure different use-cycles, ensure repeated assembly/disassembly stages, and enable reversibility [27,51,132]. Whilst maintainability refers to CE actions during the use stage through maintenance, repair, replacement, and refurbishment to preserve the value and performance of materials and components. These operations considerably contribute to overall buildings performance while lowering environmental impacts.
Recyclability and Reusability were the most approved and adopted CE strategies in the literature. From a waste hierarchy standpoint, recyclability is less preferred to reusability but was more privileged than the latter in the analyzed studies. With the intensification of the building stock, urban mining has been increasingly explored and can contribute to retrieving materials and components already in use through recycling and reuse [123,165,170]. Nevertheless, there are multiple barriers to materials reuse in the building sector such as the complexity of building structures and infective waste management, which puts forward recycling as a more feasible scenario [5,35]. Another obstacle to building’s deconstruction is the hardship of retrieving materials or components without compromising their value since the buildings themselves were not designed to embrace disassembly in the first place. Envisaging deconstruction during the design phase of a building could prevent the associated environmental impacts by 70% [132]. Still, existing buildings are seldomly considered for deconstruction. The main factor for designers to embrace circularity is a neat selection of building materials that can facilitate such operations. According to literature, steel and timber are well-established materials that can enable reversibility and direct reuse with improved connections [28,57,87,89,154].
The possibility of recovering energy from building materials and components was more mentioned throughout literature than upcycling and biodegradability. A waste-to-energy strategy is a viable option compared to landfill by reintroducing energy to the loop [84]. Materials and components which are not eligible for reuse and recycling can be incinerated as an alternative for value recovery. In specific scenarios where organic materials are involved, biodegradability could be a beneficial strategy for an efficient biological metabolism according to CE principles [90]. Upcycling or creative reuse of materials and components is another strategy to achieve materials efficiency by upgrading their quality and value [166]. Rather than recycling, upcycling contributes to keeping the products in a better closed-loop with cleaner resource flows [5,72].
Most of the experimental studies that have been conducted so far, related to CE in building materials, focused on the following three CE criteria: “recycled or recovered content”, “recyclability”, and/or “reusability”. In contrast, other quantitative and qualitative research, literature reviews, and other software simulations included a wide range of criteria [84]. This different approach evidences the discrepancy between theoretical and experimental research when implementing CE in a rigid sector that lacks innovation and still old-fashioned.
The CE was extensively promoted through the use of secondary materials from other sectors as an approach to enable industrial symbiosis. Smol et al. [56] claimed that the use of sewage sludge ash as a substitute to primary raw materials in construction products can result in better environmental impacts. Díaz-García et al. [60] investigated the use of olive oil production waste as an input for the production of structural ceramic materials and found out that this type of waste decreased the energy consumed during the manufacturing process while delivering a final product good quality. Wong et al. [74] proposed a framework for using waste generated in the automotive industry as secondary material for the construction sector. Saeli et al. [82] argued that biomass fly ash and effluents from kraft pulp mills can be incorporated into the production of mortars and geopolymeric binders. Ricciardi et al. [98] explored the use of agro-industry wastes resulting from coconut, corn, and cotton industries into the production of thermal and acoustic panels.
The Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) method was the most used method to quantify environmental benefits of CE strategies in the built environment. Lozano-Miralles et al. [70] assessed the environmental impacts of clay bricks containing organic waste and concluded that the incorporation of vegetable additive to clay bricks might decrease the studied environmental impacts from 15% to 25%. Brambilla et al. [85] compared the environmental impacts of different structural composite floor systems and found out that the structural composite floor system that was designed for disassembly was identified as the most environmentally friendly compared to the typical one. Eberhardt et al. [83] quantified the potential environmental impacts of a building designed in line with CE principles and concluded that there are several factors affecting the overall embodied environmental impacts such as type of materials used, the reuse cycles, and building’s service. In the same context, Cruz Rios et al. [87] claimed that reuse rates and transportation greatly influence the environmental impacts of reusing building materials and components.
Despite that several studies praised environmental benefits of CE approaches, Lederer et al. [59] highlighted the risk of introducing heavy metals into the materials loop, which is the case of using municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes into the production of cement that can hinder future recyclability of the final product. Likewise, some studies suggested economic benefits resulting from CE practices [96,104,163], whereas the lack of financial incentives into using secondary raw materials, labor cost for the deconstruction process, and the lack of governmental support might impede the CE uptake in the built environment [5,57,60].

6. Conclusions

The concept of CE has recently gained prominence among academia and stakeholders in the construction industry to improve resource efficiency and regulate waste management. In this paper, a review was conducted to determine criteria to select building materials and components following CE principles. A total of nine key selection criteria has been identified that cover three aspects: type of input, use stage, and end-of-life scenario. The most covered CE strategy was “recycled and recovered content” which refers to materials and components that include content from other product that reached their end-of-life. The least mentioned CE strategy was “biodegradability”, which can be explained because the building industry hardly ever relies on bio-based materials.
Although CE recently gained massive attention from academia, professionals, and policymakers, current practices related to the concept rarely take an innovative approach to ensure resource efficiency. The use of recycled products or forecasting recycling to the existing building stock does not comprehensively promote CE. Cutting-edge technologies are required to move further from recycling and apply more economically viable and environmentally friendly CE strategies.
It is worth mentioning that numerous studies promoted the use of materials passport and other digital means such as web-based platforms and Building Information Modelling (BIM) to keep track of materials and components and assess the level of circularity in buildings. This novel approach can bring about CE by increasing collaboration between stakeholders and introducing automation for CE assessment.
Further research can be developed about the hierarchization of the identified criteria to assign weights to each criterion according to its priority to promote CE in the construction sector. Other sustainability dimensions, such as environmental, economic, and social, should be included to provide a more comprehensive approach under the UN’s Sustainability Development Goals.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, K.M.R.; methodology, K.M.R.; validation, K.M.R., R.M. and L.B.; investigation, K.M.R.; writing—original draft preparation, K.M.R.; writing—review and editing, R.M. and L.B.; supervision, R.M. and L.B.; funding acquisition, L.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by University of Minho, grant number UMINHO/BID/2020/71.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

All the retrieved journal articles can be found in Scopus and Web of Science databases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

The following Table A1 summarizes the main features and the covered CE criteria within each journal article included in the literature review.
Table A1. Summary of the reviewed journal articles.
Table A1. Summary of the reviewed journal articles.
ReferencesObjective of the StudyResearch MethodsMain OutcomeCovered CE Criteria
[56]To explore the use of Sewage Sludge Ash as an input into construction materials to promote CELiterature Review and exploratory studyThe use of Sewage Sludge Ash as a substitute in construction materials can reduce environmental impacts and promote CE in the construction industry- Recycled or recovered content
[57]To determine the best practice for gypsum wasteQuantitative KPIs 17 KPIs were selected and applied to 5 European pilot projects and the results suggests that recycling gypsum at its end-of-life is more suitable than landfill from an economic standpoint
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[103]To quantify energy consumption and GHG emissions of gypsum recyclingLCA and MFAThree gypsum recycling scenarios were compared and the results shows that recycling gypsum does not impact energy consumption throughout its lifecycle (mainly due to transportation and pre-processing). On the other hand, GHG emissions decreased when recycling rates were higher
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[58]To investigate the obstacles and motivations of deconstruction and building materials reuse in western Germany.Survey and energy analysis of the deconstruction processDespite the environmental benefits of deconstruction, the process still requires economic incentives, a trained construction team, and a special attention to the impacts on human-beings.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
reusability
-
recyclability
-
Ease for deconstruction
-
upcycling potential
[59]To determine the applicability of using municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes as a cementitious material at the national levelMFA and case studyThe use of municipal solid waste incineration fly ashes as a secondary material at certain rates can increase the content of heavy metals in concrete which will hinder the recyclability of the final product at its end-of-life according to the Austrian technical guideline for recycling construction materials
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[60]To investigate the use of olive oil production waste as an input to produce structural ceramic materialsExperimental studyIncorporating olive oil production waste in the production of ceramic material will decrease the amount of energy consumed during the manufacturing process while delivering good quality materials depending on the wet pomace content - Recycled or recovered content
[61]To study and measure the loss rates of steel while undergoing several products life cycles on a global scaleGlobal MaTrace which is a model based on input-output analysis, dynamic MFA, and LCA One of the approaches to alleviate the loss of steel at its end-of-life is to use it as a secondary material in buildings as the latter have prolonged life-spans- Recycled or recovered content
[55]To provide insights on the challenges behind the lack of reuse of structural steel in UKLiterature review and semi-structured interviewsThe main barriers to steel reuse in UK are cost, wrong client perception of reused steel, availability, traceability, and the time-consuming process of deconstruction
-
Reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[62]To develop a new approach to MFA and quantify the recycling potential of construction materials for the German building stockExtended MFAThere is a lack of use of recycled aggregates as a secondary material due to a loss during the recovery chain and the technical requirements for the replacement ratio in the German context
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[152]To develop a BIM-based assessment methodology to measure the recovery potential of building materials at the design stageLiterature review, software simulation, and a case-studyA tool to estimate the amount of materials that can be recovered at the end-of-life of a building and their potential to be recycled or reused.
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[63]To analyze literature regarding the environmental assessment of buildings using LCA and identify the lack of CE integrationLiterature reviewA comprehensive framework to improve LCA of buildings in way that considers CE principles in the process
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
upcycling potential
[104]To explore the environmental and economic feasibility of using cork as an insulation material for buildings retrofitEnvironmental assessment (LCA) and economic analysisDespite its environmental benefits, the use of cork as a thermal insulation material revealed to be more expensive than other materials. Still, cork boards can be recycled at their end-of-life and used as an input for new products
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[64]To identify regional sustainability benefits for bioproducts and highlight opportunities and barriers for the reuse of recovered wood Survey and interviews for two case-studiesHurdles might be encountered when attempting to implement CE in the wood industry due to a lack of governmental support and low demand for recovered wood from the construction industry
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[65]To develop a bituminous membrane for sound insulation with recycled materialsExperimental studyThe new developed membrane can have different recycled materials (e.g., plastics, rubber, membranes), enhance acoustic performance, and be applied in different sectors such as construction and automotive sectors.- Recycled or recovered content
[66]To identify best approaches to implement CE principles in prefabricated buildingsLiterature reviewSeven strategies were developed to apply CE in prefabricated buildings such as design for disassembly, recyclability and reusability, reduce raw materials input and rely on secondary materials, and design out waste
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[67]To experimentally measure the release of polluting elements from extensive green roofs containing recycled materialsExperimental studyFrom an environmental perspective, extensive green roofs with up to 75% content of fine mixed recycled aggregate were acceptable- Recycled or recovered content
[105]To analyze literature regarding the Chinese perspective on construction and demolition wasteLiterature reviewEconomic and governmental barriers are impeding the Chinese construction sector to shift towards sustainable practices and minimize waste generation
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[68]To explore the level of understanding of CE in the construction sector and outline potential barriers to the concept’s implementationSurveyTo enable a nation-wide CE implementation in the construction sectors, several technical and economic barriers needs to be overcome through specific CE guidelines and viable business models
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
reusability
-
recyclability
-
ease for deconstruction
-
maintainability
[170]To develop an assessment methodology for CE implementation in the construction sectorLiterature review, the Delphi technique, and a statistical analysisA set of indicators was developed to measure the CE implementation. According to the results the most important dimension was “energy” followed by the adoption of the 3Rs principles
-
Recycled or recovered content - reusability
-
maintainability
[5]To identify and classify potential barriers for CE implementation in managing C&DWLiterature review and MCDMTwenty-two barriers for C&DW management were identified and classified under three dimensions: technical, behavioral, and legal.
-
Recycled or recovered content - recyclability
-
reusability
-
upcycling potential
[69]Environmental assessment of waste treatment following the L’Aquila earthquakeLCALocal demolition debris treatment will offer various environmental and social benefits by minimizing transport and creating jobs- Recycled or recovered content
[70]To assess the environmental impacts of clay bricks containing organic waste LCAThe incorporation of vegetable additive to clay bricks might decrease the studied environmental impacts from 15% to 25%- Recycled or recovered content
[71]To analyze current approaches for capital projects planning and propose a framework and a set of strategies to embed CE in these projectsAnalytical researchA framework for capital project planning is proposed which includes adaptive reuse and building stock analysis. The adaptive reuse will offer economic and environmental benefits but it can be hindered by the labor costs and the building’s complexity, thus it requires effective tools to predict the end-of-life scenario and associated impacts
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
maintainability
-
energy recoverability
[72]To experimentally investigate the mechanical feasibility of reclaimed timber to produce cross-laminated secondary timberExperimental studyMinor defects on reclaimed timber will have slight impacts on the mechanical properties of cross-laminated timber, however a combination of primary and secondary feedstock will offer suitable mechanical properties for the latter
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
upcycling potential
[73]To investigate the environmental and economic benefits of implementing CE principles in the C&DW sectorLiterature reviewAdopting CE in the C&DW sector offers various environmental and economic benefits depending on several factors such as type of buildings and materials involved, location, transport, and local economic and political context
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
[153]To evaluate the flows of non-structural building materials in the built environment to assess their replacementQuantitative research and case-studyTo shift towards CE and embrace recyclability and reusability in the built environment, it is crucial to quantify current material stock in the built environment
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
[74]To investigate the recyclability of vehicles at their end-of-life as a secondary material for the construction industryLiterature review and The proposal of a framework to reuse and recycle vehicles as an input for the construction industry while taking into account the Malaysian context
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[28]To promote the use of timber to embrace CE principles in the construction industryAnalytical researchDesign for disassembly is considered as an essential feature to be planned ahead to enable reuse of building elements
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
-
energy recoverability
[75]To improve resource efficiency in the construction sector by producing bricks with recycled contentExploratory research and case-studyThe production of bricks with secondary raw materials is technically feasible and requires cross-sectoral collaboration. Moreover, the produced bricks can be entirely recyclable at their end-of-life
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[154]To grasp the reason behind the short lifespan of residential buildings in JapanLiterature review and interviewsCE measures to extend buildings’ lifespan along with governmental and economic support can be adopted to avoid premature demolition of social buildings
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[36]To quantify the environmental impacts of mortars with recycled contentLCAThe incorporation of recycled fine aggregates for the manufacturing of masonry mortars can decrease the environmental impacts with special attention to the transport of these secondary raw materials - Recycled or recovered content
[76]To test and valorize the use of fine particle product from quarrying processes as a secondary raw materialExperimental studyThe treatment of quarrying waste with hydrocyclones can produce by-products that can replace typical raw materials in concretes and ceramics- Recycled or recovered content
[77]To experimentally test the technical feasibility of bricks containing waste thermoplasticsExperimental studyThe results of compressive strength proved that thermoplastic wastes can be incorporated in bricks for up to 10%. This type of bricks has also high thermal resistance which can improve the energy efficiency of buildings- Recycled or recovered content
[171]To promote non-destructive testing as a method to assess the recovery of building materialsLiterature reviewThe non-destructive testing can offer a valuable approach for waste management in the renovation process through technical assessment
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
[78]To identify material efficiency strategies and trade-offs in order to reduce GHG emissions resulting from the construction, automotive, and electronics sectorsLiterature reviewThe most significant opportunity to reduce GHG emissions lies in the building sector. This can be achieved through material efficiency strategies such as intensifying the building’s use, waste recycling, and the reuse of building elements
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
[155]To understand the relationship between green public procurement, CE, and sustainable development practices in the construction industryLiterature reviewPublic authorities can rely on green public procurement to support CE and lower environmental impacts of the construction materials by enhancing green awareness and establishing specific guidelines and standards- Recyclability
[156]To quantify the material stock of non-residential building and promote urban miningQuantitative methodology based on Material Composition Indicator (MCI)The implementation of CE strategies for the building stocks requires a quantitative approach to measure the in-use building materials for an accurate resource recovery
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
[54]To promote the use of recycled aggregates in the construction industryExploratory case-studiesThe incorporation of recycled aggregates in construction materials has been extensively studied and several case-studies have proved the feasibility of such practices from technical, economic, and environmental perspectives- Recycled or recovered content
[38]To highlight the role of business models and policies to promote the use of secondary materials to decarbonize the construction sectorQualitative methodologyBy relying on innovative business models and policy support, the secondary materials can potentially reduce the carbon footprint of the building sector- Recycled or recovered content
[79]To identify CE solutions to embed the concept’s principles in the construction sectorQualitative methodologyTo enable CE strategies for an effective C&DW management, there is a need for governmental support and proper promotion and dissemination to raise awareness
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[80]To enhance the comprehensiveness and precision of building LCA assessment by including CE-related principlesLCA-based methodologyAdopting a resource recovery principle and waste management in different building life-stages can lead to a 63% reduction in harmful environmental impacts
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
energy recoverability
[81]To provide a design technique for truss structures using reclaimed components and explore their environmental benefitsStructural optimization and case-studyDesigning truss structures using reclaimed elements implies higher complexity and precise techniques. Still, structures made of reused elements resulted in lower embodied energy and carbon
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[82]To investigate the use of waste generated from the pulp mill in geopolymeric binders and mortars Experimental studyThe use of biomass fly ash and an alkaline effluent from the kraft pulp industry in the production of mortars and geopolymeric binders resulted in construction products with decent workability and mechanical properties- Recycled or recovered content
[50]To explore the use of recycled materials as fibers in reinforced concreteLiterature reviewIn spite of an extensive experimental research on the use of recycled materials as fibers in reinforced concrete, there is still a lack of specific research regarding the environmental, economic, and social benefits of these products- Recycled or recovered content
[83]To quantify the potential environmental impacts of office building applying CE principles using a simplified allocation methodLCA and case-studyThe findings suggest that the type of materials used, the reuse cycles, and building’s service life greatly affects the overall embodied environmental impacts
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease for deconstruction
-
energy recoverability
[84]To identify the main aspects that lead to the adoption of CE in the C&DW sectorLiterature reviewA theoretical framework to define the relevant CE strategies that can be applied in five lifecycle stages of the construction sector
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
energy recoverability
-
maintainability
[157]To provide a tool to assess building’s end-of-life performance at the early stageSoftware simulation, BIM, and case-studyA platform relying on BIM to ensure that buildings are designed under CE principles when they reach their end-of-life
-
Recyclability
-
Reusability
-
energy recoverability
-
ease for deconstruction
[85]To assess and compare the environmental impacts of different structural composite floor systems LCA and case-studyThe structural composite floor system that was designed for disassembly was identified as the most environmentally friendly compared to the typical one
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
-
energy recoverability
-
ease for deconstruction
[86]To analyze efficient C&DW management strategies for a Greek islandMixed methods approach based on dynamic MFAWith only 14% recycling rate of C&DW, Samothraki needs the implementation of effective CE-related strategies in order to reach the EU recycling target of 70%
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[158]To develop a BIM platform for the construction supply chain and calculate C&DW generation from the design stageSoftware simulation and BIMUsing a collaborative platform to predict the building’s end-of-life scenario from the design stage could minimize C&DW generation
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
[87]To quantify the environmental impacts of the reuse of building componentsLCATransportation and reuse rates greatly influence the environmental impacts of reusing building materials and components
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease for deconstruction
-
energy recoverability
[88]To identify practices within the literature regarding the minimization of life cycle energy and carbon emissions using computer simulationLiterature reviewThe use of BIM to optimize the life-cycle design of buildings revealed to be a key enabler for CE strategies
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
reusability
-
recyclability
[159]To highlight the current obstacles to implement CE strategies in 3 Dutch citiesLiterature review, desk research, and interviewsOne of the identified barriers is the lack of governmental support and CE-related instruments regarding the use of secondary materials
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
[89]To investigate the technical feasibility of incorporating recycled concrete aggregates in precast concretes and assess their associated impactsExperimental study and LCADespite lower mechanical and durability properties for precast concretes incorporated with different ratios of recycled concrete aggregates, the final products still met the technical requirements
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
[90]To explore the process of using materials passport platform (Madaster) to assess building products used in a circular buildingDocumentation, quantitative study, and case-studyUsing the Madaster platform, the results revealed that 96% of the assessed building is circular with a ratio of 92% of recoverable elements
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
-
energy recoverability
[91]To develop a methodology to analyze and measure environmental and economic benefits of adaptive reuse for existing buildings’ structureLCA, BIM, LCC, and a case-studyFrom an environmental perspective, avoiding the use of new construction materials resulted in lower impacts, whereas economic profitability was noted when structural subsystems undergo an adaptive reuse
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease for deconstruction
[92]To investigate the incorporation of electric arc furnace dust in self-compacting mortars at different ratios, and promote their harmless impactsExperimental studyThe results showed, that from a mechanical perspective, it is possible to incorporate up to 25% of electric arc furnace dust as cement replacement in self-compacting mortars- Recycled or recovered content
[93]To develop and test a binder based on biomass ash, lime hydrate, and metakaolin to produce lightweight mortarsExperimental studyThe lightweight mortars with biomass ash presented good technical performances, which can promote its use as a secondary raw material and avoid ash disposal - Recycled or recovered content
[94]To investigate the use of plastic wastes as additives in the production of unfired clay bricks Experimental studyHigher ratios of clay replacement by polymeric waste with smaller grain size resulted in low-cost lightweight clay bricks as the bulk density was lower- Recycled or recovered content
[95]To analyze the literature and identify key CE strategies for low-carbon construction materialsLiterature reviewOne of the identified approaches to reduce the GHG emissions from 30% to 65% is to rely on recycled or reused materials as secondary resources
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
upcycling potential
[96]To highlight the issues of C&DW activities in Romania and provide future pathways towards more sustainable management.Literature review and theoretical frameworkOne of the proposed solutions to overcome poor C&DW management is to support the use of recycled aggregates and create economic incentives
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[97]To verify whether the use of materials passports can improve the recyclability of buildings at their end-of-lifeBIM, material passports, case-studyUsing material passport helped to assess and optimize the recyclability of buildings. The findings suggest that buildings with high recycling potential do not necessary lead to low environmental impacts due to several factors such as the total mass of waste generation
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[98]To explore the use of agro-industry waste in the building sector as insulation panelsLiterature reviewThermal and acoustic panels produced from the waste of coconut, corn, or cotton presents good performances compared to common ones- Recycled or recovered content
[99]To review current research regarding CE in the built environment and highlight the gaps to support the concept’s implementationLiterature reviewThe main investigated topic within the CE studies is the reuse of C&DW. Still, one of the identified obstacles to implementing CE in the built environment is the lack of incentives regarding such practices.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease for deconstruction
-
durability
[100]To understand and compare C&DW management between China and the USALiterature reviewAmong the recommendations to tackle C&DW issues is to ensure a governmental support and setup economic incentives
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
reusability
-
recyclability
[101]To investigate the use and feasibility of cellulose fibers recovered from wastewater into non-structural mortarsExperimental researchThe use of recovered cellulose fibers in mortars proved economic and technical feasibility as the additions of these fibers enhanced some physical and mechanical aspects of the final product- Recycled or recovered content
[106]To study the recent progress in literature regarding the implementation of CE Literature reviewThe implementation of CE requires an early consideration right from the design stage to allow a projected reuse of materials and components at the building’s end-of-life
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[102]To develop a methodology for urban mining at the city level and assess the recovery and reuse potential of construction components in residential buildings An extended dynamic MFA and case-study The developed urban mining assessment methodology provided insights on the potential of reintroducing the recoverable and reusable materials as low-cost secondary materials into the built environment
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease for deconstruction
-
upcycling potential
[2]To calculate the inflows and outflows of residential and service buildings stock in 26 regions between 1970 and 2050A modelling methodology for buildings stocksA growth of 50% of the residential building stock is expected by 2050.The findings also suggest that by that time, only 55% of the demand for construction materials such as steel and wood will be achieved by recycled building materials.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
Recyclability
[107]To support CE by proposing a database acting as a material and component bank to enable their recycling and reuse at buildings’ end-of-life stageLiterature review and theoretical frameworkThe database can be linked to a BIM model to optimize the recycling and reuse of building materials and components throughout different stages of the construction process
-
Recycled or recovered content - recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
-
ease of deconstruction
-
maintainability
[168]To experimentally test and validate the mechanical performance of demountable shear connectors in steel-concrete beams Experimental study and software simulationThe results showed that using bolts with nuts on both ends of the steel flange can be used as shear connectors that will be able to be disassembled
-
Reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[30]To understand the drivers and incentives for recovering building materials and components for reuseLiterature review, semi-structured interviews, and analytical researchThe demolition contractor will consider reuse if three requirements are met: identifying financial incentives, proper knowledge for disassembly, and manage future performance
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
Recyclability
-
Reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
-
durability
[108]To study the feasibility of incorporating electric arc furnace dust as a cement replacement in mortarExperimental studyThe use of electric arc furnace improved the mechanical properties of mortars compared to the reference. However, due to the presence of lead (Pb), these mortars were classified as hazardous- Recycled or recovered content
[109]To compare carbon emissions and CE indicators of two production processes based on different system boundaries Quantitative research and case-studyThe use of recycled content in the production of stonewool and extruded polystyrene resulted in lower carbon footprints in two different system boundaries (cradle-to-gate and cradle-to-site)
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[110]To propose a methodology to optimize the reuse of building elements and quantify the environmental impacts of this practiceLiterature review, software simulation, BIM, LCA, and case studyThe developed methodology was used on a case-study and the authors concluded that for an effective reuse of load-bearing elements, concepts such standardization and design for reuse should be generalized
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
reusability
-
ease for deconstruction
-
energy recoverability
[111]To compare the C&DW management in Brazil, USA, and European Union (EU), and outline the differences and similaritiesData collection and analysisThe study concluded that the C&DW management in Brazil, in comparison to the EU and USA is confronted to several hurdles such as lack of economic incentives, lack of governmental support, and low quality of recycled materials.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[112]To explore the C&DW management in Qatar and report on the benefits of using recycled aggregatesLiterature review, SWOT analysis and case studySeven strategies were identified to increase the use of recycled aggregates in the construction industry, to list a few: raising awareness among construction stakeholders, relying on LCA to highlight the environmental benefits, and establishing a market for secondary materials
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
[113]To develop a BIM-based platform to store information regarding materials and components to manage their recycling and reuseSoftware simulation and BIMThe developed web-based tool can store all the relevant characteristics of materials and components to provide building stakeholders insights regarding waste management
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
-
ease for deconstruction
[114]To analyze the inflows and outflows of construction materials in a Chinese districtMFAThe study revealed that while considering the inflows and outflows of construction materials, the amount of reused or recycled materials has been comparatively low due to technical and economic factors
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[115]To introduce a special issue regarding solutions to lower the carbon footprint of the built environment through CE principles and resource efficiencyN/AN/A
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
durability
[116]To analyze and compare current approaches to quantify environmental impacts related to the reuse and recycling of building elements through a case-studyLiterature review, LCA, and case-studyThe current LCA methodologies do not take into account the environmental benefits of reusing building elements at their end-of-life due to several factors such as the disassembly of the components and their degradation when undergoing a use/reuse cycle
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
-
energy recoverability
[117]To analyze the type and flow of materials resulting from C&DW and determine their potential of reuse and recyclingMFA and case-studyRecycling C&DW as secondary raw materials to produce concrete, bricks, asphalt can reduce the reliance on virgin raw materials and support waste minimization
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[118]To experimentally test the technical feasibility of using cooking oil to produce bio-foams as an insulating materialExperimental studyThe production of bio-foams using cooking oil exhibited good technical performances which offers a promising approach to waste oil- Recycled or recovered content
[29]To highlight the complexity of applying CE principles in buildings to extend their service-life and close materials-loopLiterature reviewReversibility and durability are two potential indicators to improve the building’s design in line with CE principles. However, there is a lack of addressing these two indicators in CE assessment at the building level
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
-
ease of deconstruction
-
biodegradability
[27]To analyze CE-related literature and identify barriers and opportunities to apply the concept in the construction industryLiterature reviewA framework to implement CE in the building industry was developed and several strategies, such as durability of construction materials, governmental support, and adequate CE design approaches have been judged critical for CE adoptions.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
-
ease of deconstruction
-
maintainability
[119]To study and analyze the design approach as well as the thermal performance of a bio-based ventilated façade Experimental studyThe façade is made from recyclable and bio-based materials which ensure low environmental impacts with indoor air quality. Moreover, the ventilated façade can be disassembled at its end-of-life to be reassembled in another location
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[120]To test and validate the feasibility of the heating-air classification system as a process to treat ultrafine recycled concreteExperimental study and LCAThe optimal replacement ratio of cement by ultrafine recycled concrete was 5%. Additionally, all the assessed environmental impacts of concrete with this ratio were reduced by 5%
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[121]To assess and compare the environmental benefits of CE practices and conventional ones at a country levelLCA and case-studyApplying CE principles in residential buildings can at least reduce the environmental impacts by 16%. Likewise, at the country level, adopting reuse and recycling resulted in environmental benefits
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[122]To assess the environmental impacts of using shipping containers as building componentsLCAUsing shipping containers as structural elements showed environmental benefits in comparison to a typical steel structure. However, these environmental benefits are tightly dependent of the waste transportation from depot to manufacturing- Recycled or recovered content
[123]To develop a framework for measuring and enhancing the sustainability of technologies integrating thermal energy storage as an approach to shift towards CELCA and case-studyRecycling the materials involved in the studied building-like cubicle at its end-of-life decreased the environmental impacts by 5%. While including recycled content in the early stage resulted in 30% less environmental impacts.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[124]To and analyze the technical feasibility of reinforced cement mortars designed for coating which incorporate recycled fibersExperimental studyThe study showed that recycled fibers have similar physical and mechanical behaviors to commercialized fibers when used to reinforce cement mortars for external coating, which confirms their technical feasibility- Recycled or recovered content
[125]To investigate and categorize hurdles and drivers for building elements reuse and outline possible actions to overcome these barriers Literature reviewThe most influential barrier to building component reuse is the economic aspect considering the time and labor needed to deconstruct a building in addition to a lack of demand for reused items.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[126]To shed the light on new and existing C&DW and outline a framework to aid decision-making regarding their future use in construction projectsMulti-criteria analysisAccording to the selected criteria, the most adequate C&DW and by-product is fly ash followed by recycled concrete.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[49]To review current literature regarding CE-related practices in buildings and quantify their feasibility in this sectorLiterature reviewThe CE strategy that was the most covered by the selected literature was building disassembly, followed by materials selection. The authors identified the lack of measuring the environmental benefits of CE as a potential obstacle for implementing the concept
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
-
durability
-
maintainability
-
energy recoverability
[127]To study the relationship between building conservation and CE practicesLiterature reviewMerging building conservation and CE can support the preservation of the built environment.However, both approaches are confronted to the same obstacles such as low-cost virgin materials and high-cost labor.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
maintainability
-
energy recoverability
[40]To assess and compare the environmental impacts of indoor flooring systems from cradle-to-cradleLCA and sensitivity analysisDespite having heavier impact factors in the manufacturing process, inorganic floors showed better environmental performance due to their low need for maintenance
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
maintainability
[128]To integrate MFA with stakeholders’ objective and regional policies as an approach to model materials stock and predict future inflows and outflowsLiterature review, MFA, survey, and case-studyThe results show that most influential policy measure is increasing taxes and costs on virgin resources, followed by increasing disposal fees and raising awareness among stakeholders. These measures combined can lower the material flows between 2018 and 2030.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[160]To study the leaching behavior of concrete containing lead slag as a partial replacement of fine aggregates, in real and laboratory conditionsExperimental study and software simulationThe mechanical and leaching characteristics of solidified products with 25% of slag can be considered as satisfying. However, the release of Arsenic from these products hinders the use of alkaline lead slag in concrete as fine aggregate replacement- Recycled or recovered content
[161]To identify the benefits and opportunities of green buildings compared to traditional onesCost-benefit analysisDespite their high initial cost, timber and hemp, can ensure better insulation which will lead to economic and environmental benefits as they can be reused or recycled at their end-of-life
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
[129]To quantify and estimate the amount of construction materials stocked in buildings, roads, and sidewalks in two Canadian citiesBottom-up quantitative analysis and case-studyThe results indicate an increase in the material stock by 2041 with higher waste generation in both cities. The author also highlighted the need for better C&DW management as recycled materials are being underused
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
maintainability
[130]To identify and evaluate current practices and barriers to apply CE principles for buildings envelope layersLiterature review and analytical studyThe authors identified twenty key circular performance criteria to assess the feasibility of embedding CE in current timber wall construction. Among the identified hurdles for CE adoption, the authors referred to chemical connections which impede reversible design and a lack of standardized geometry.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
-
ease of deconstruction
-
upcycling potential
[6]To review and analyze the implementation of CE across European countries in various sectors based on several frameworksLiterature reviewThe construction industry is one of the most prioritized sectors to shift towards CE practices. Among the analyzed frameworks, the authors concluded that “recycling” is the most adopted CE strategy to keep materials in closed-loops
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
maintainability
-
durability
-
energy recoverability
[131]To assess environmental impacts of buildings and identify the source of largest GHG and propose a CE approach to tackle this issueLCA and case-studyAdopting CE strategies in buildings such as reuse of materials and components, adequate materials selection according to their technical and environmental performances, and forecasting reuse and recycling for building materials, can reduce the overall embodied GHG of buildings.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
durability
-
energy recoverability
[132]To propose a CE assessment methodology for the building materials and components in accordance to design for disassembly criteria and embodied environmental impactsMixed-methods approach and case-studiesThe inclusion of design for disassembly criteria such as accessibility and types of connections, can have a better assessment for the end-of-life scenario of building materials and components.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[133]To review and organize current knowledge regarding CE approaches in European and Chinese cities Literature reviewThe authors identified a research gap regarding CE implementation in the construction sector which is the lack of buildings LCA studies to highlight the benefits of CE strategies
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
-
maintainability
-
ease for deconstruction
-
energy recoverability
[19]To bridge the gap of the lack of CE indicators regarding the adaptive reuse of cultural heritage buildings by developing a comprehensive frameworkAnalytical researchThe developed framework comprises 20 CE-related environmental indictors. The proposed indicators tackle aim at reducing the energy and water use and promote the reuse and recycling of building materials and components in and off-site.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[134]To assess the environmental performances of using recycled brick waste as aggregate replacement, cement replacement, or as a precursor for alkaline activationLCAFrom an environmental perspective, the best scenario for using recycled brick waste was to partially replace cement, while using brick waste as recycled aggregate did not provide considerable environmental benefits.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[169]To propose a new strategy to reuse metal waste from the automotive industry as building facades and quantify the environmental impacts of such practiceExperimental study and LCAOne of the design strategies for building facades proposed by the authors showed less environmental impacts and more economic profitability. The authors concluded that the environmental and economic impacts of the design approach depend on the aesthetics and functionalities
-
Reusability
-
durability
-
upcycling potential
[135]To study the mechanical, physical, and durability performances of façade panels produced with C&DW in both laboratory and real conditionsExperimental studyThe findings confirmed the technical feasibility of façade panels produced with C&DW aggregates as they demonstrated satisfactory results.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
durability
[136]To assess the quantity of bricks used in external walls of residential and office buildings to predict their further reuse as an approach to enable urban miningLCA, quantitative research, and case-studyThe developed model comprises four critical features, spatial and temporal dimensions, embodied carbon, and building typologies, which can accurately provide an estimation of in-use bricks to outline future pathways for their reuse and recycling
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
-
reusability
[137]To investigate the physical, mechanical, and environmental properties of concretes containing alternative fine and coarse aggregates derived from different sectorsLiterature reviewThe substitution of fine aggregates by ground granulated blast furnace slag, electric arc furnace dust, and ceramic powder, improved some of the properties of concretes such as durability and workability.
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
durability
[138]To investigate and evaluate the performances of lightweight aggregates by using waste glass, slag, and waste sedimentExperimental studyThe lightweight aggregates that were produced with waste glass, basic-oxygen-furnace slag, and dredged harbor sediment showed good mechanical and physical properties in addition to offering economic benefits compared to typical lightweight aggregates- Recycled or recovered content
[139]To study the mechanical and physical properties of concretes produced with silica stone waste as a cement replacementExperimental studyThe results showed that the optimum replacement ratio was 5% as it improved the mechanical properties and the microstructure of the final product - Recycled or recovered content
[162]To quantify and compare the environmental benefits of recycling and reuse at building levelLiterature review, LCA, and case-studyThe circular building, which is designed and built for disassembly, allows a reuse of 62% of the mass of the building and reduces GHG emissions by 88% along with other environmental benefits
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
-
ease of deconstruction
[140]To use the date from LEED and waste reclamation facilities to quantify C&DW flows MFA and case-studyBetween the period of 2007 and 2017, 81% of the total of C&DW generated in Philadelphia was diverted and used into the production of secondary raw materials
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[141]To investigate the mechanical properties of composite lightweight slab made of wooden joist and mortar produced with recycled aggregatesSoftware simulation and Experimental and analytical studyThe mortars produced with expanded clay aggregates and recycled fines showed satisfactory mechanical behaviors. Similarly, the incorporation of this type of mortars in the studied slab increased the mechanical strength- Recycled or recovered content
[142]To study the effects of sodium salts on the production of lightweight aggregates synthetized from sludge marine clayExperimental studyThe authors concluded that adding the Sodium Carbonate is beneficial for the production of ultra-lightweight aggregates from sludge marine clay- Recycled or recovered content
[143]To study the feasibility of producing mortar blocks incorporating Polyurethane Foam and electric arc furnace and test their thermal and mechanical behaviorsExperimental study, software simulation, and case-studyThe produced mortar blocks from recovered materials exhibited similar thermo-mechanical properties to conventional mortar blocks which validates their usability - Recycled or recovered content
[163]To quantify the amount of construction materials stored in buildings and infrastructures and inform about their spatial distributionQuantitative research and case-studyThe significant amount of construction materials stocked in the built environment can inform key-stakeholders about the next steps towards urban mining and CE as an approach for better C&DW management
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
[164]To explore the end-of-life scenarios of external thermal insulation composite systems made with expanded polystyreneAnalytical researchUsing specific treatment, the expanded polystyrene can be recovered from the external thermal insulation composite systems and separated from other impurities to be further recycled
-
Recyclability
-
energy recoverability
[144]To quantify the environmental impacts of rammed earth materials containing crushed bricks and concrete and other by-productsExperimental study and LCAResults suggest that using recycled feedstock in rammed earth materials reduced GHG emissions by up to 73% when compared to a typical cavity brick. Additionally, transportation remains a crucial factor that needs to be considered to reduce GHG emissions
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
durability
[145]To quantify the material stock in French residential buildings to predict their further reuse as recycled aggregates and highlight the barriers set ahead for such practiceMFA and case-studyThe results show that a reduction of 15% to 19% in natural aggregate extraction can be achieved through the recycling of current materials stocked in French residential buildings into aggregates
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[146]To investigate the effectiveness of rejuvenators to retrieve the desirable properties in aged asphaltsExperimental study and software simulationThe use of certain rejuvenators restored chemical, mechanical, and physical properties of aged asphalts which made them eligible for recycling
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[165]To promote the use of the indicator waste diversion rate as a means to better improve the C&DW managementDesk research and case-studyThe average waste diversion rate in residential projects in Australia is 64%. The findings suggest that this rate will further increase by 2025 to reach 78%. However, several barriers can hinder the recycling of C&DW such as the lack of economic incentives and governmental support
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
-
energy recoverability
[166]To quantify the material flows and their associated GHG in a neighborhood over a period of 60 years to better understand the potential of material efficiency strategies Dynamic MFA, LCA, and case-studyAdopting the following material efficiency strategies; extending the lifetime of buildings, intensifying their use, and improving material productivity, can reduce the embodied GHG by 44%
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
-
upcycling potential
[147]To present a platform for construction project management that includes technical standards and specifications, assessment tool for CE, and a database, among other featuresAnalytical researchThe developed platforms incite stakeholders into using secondary materials and will promote green public procurement through an assessment tool for circularity and sustainability and ensuring the compliance to technical and environmental criteria
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[148]To investigate the use of Waelz slag as a clay replacement into the production of ceramic bricksExperimental studyThe maximum replacement ratio of clay by Waelz slag in the production of ceramic bricks was found to be 10%. Further replacement ratio can compromise the technical properties of the final product- Recycled or recovered content
[149]To study the technical feasibility of incorporating glass waste in gypsum composites Experimental studyAdding glass waste in gypsum composites significantly improved mechanical and physical properties of the final product when compared to the reference- Recycled or recovered content
[167]To understand the relationship between BIM and Lean construction to enhance the deconstruction processAnalytical researchThe BIM-Lean matrix revealed seventy-three interactions, which suggests that BIM functionalities and Lean principles have high compliance ratio in deconstruction projects
-
Recyclability
-
reusability
-
maintainability
-
ease of deconstruction
[150]To highlight the need for a virtual marketplace as a platform for creating economic profitability out of wastes and by-productsAnalytical researchThe proposed platform can act as a network of users interested in collaboration and increasing the value of recycled materials and by-products
-
Recycled or recovered content
-
recyclability
[151]To study the development of ceramic tiles incorporating waste glass and fly ash that have new smart functionalitiesExperimental studyThe developed glass-ceramic tiles can be used as smart coating with different functionalities such as self-cleaning, anti-slip in wet surfaces, and in the automation of a building- Recycled or recovered content

References

  1. Rahla, K.M.; Mateus, R.; Bragança, L. Comparative sustainability assessment of binary blended concretes using Supplementary Cementitious Materials (SCMs) and Ordinary Portland Cement (OPC). J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 445–459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Deetman, S.; Marinova, S.; van der Voet, E.; van Vuuren, D.P.; Edelenbosch, O.; Heijungs, R. Modelling global material stocks and flows for residential and service sector buildings towards 2050. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 245, 118658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ness, D.A.; Xing, K. Toward a Resource-Efficient Built Environment: A Literature Review and Conceptual Model. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 572–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Liu, L.; Liang, Y.; Song, Q.; Li, J. A review of waste prevention through 3R under the concept of circular economy in China. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2017, 19, 1314–1323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mahpour, A. Prioritizing barriers to adopt circular economy in construction and demolition waste management. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 134, 216–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Mhatre, P.; Panchal, R.; Singh, A.; Bibyan, S. A systematic literature review on the circular economy initiatives in the European Union. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 2021, 26, 187–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. European Commission. Communication from the EU Commission, Closing the Loop-an EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy; COM/2015/0614 Final; European Commission: Brussels, Belgium, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  8. Pomponi, F.; Moncaster, A. Circular economy for the built environment: A research framework. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 710–718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Ghisellini, P.; Cialani, C.; Ulgiati, S. A review on circular economy: The expected transition to a balanced interplay of environmental and economic systems. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 114, 11–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Arup. The Circular Economy in the Built Environment. 2016. Available online: http://www.driversofchange.com/publications/ (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  11. BAMB Project: Circular Building Assessment Prototype. 2018. Available online: https://www.bamb2020.eu/post/cba-prototype/ (accessed on 4 March 2021).
  12. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Cities in the Circular Economy: An Initial Exploration. 2017. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/publications (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  13. Boulding, K.E. The Economics of the Coming Spaceship Earth; The MIT Press: New York, NY, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  14. Pearce, D.W.; Turner, R.K. Economics of Natural Resources and the Environment; JHU Press: Baltimore, MD, USA, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  15. The Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Schools of Thought: Cradle-to-Cradle. 2017. Available online: https://www.ellenmacarthurfoundation.org/circular-economy/schools-of-thought/cradle2cradle (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  16. Kirchherr, J.; Reike, D.; Hekkert, M. Conceptualizing the circular economy: An analysis of 114 definitions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 127, 221–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Preston, F. A Global Redesign? Shaping the Circular Economy; Energy, Environment and Resource Governance: Oxford, UK, 2012; pp. 1–20. [Google Scholar]
  18. MacArthur, E. Towards the Circular Economy. J. Ind. Ecol. 2013, 2, 23–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Foster, G.; Kreinin, H.; Stagl, S. The future of circular environmental impact indicators for cultural heritage buildings in Europe. Environ. Sci. Eur. 2020, 32, 1–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. European Parliament and Council. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 November 2008 on waste and repealing certain directives. Off. J. Eur. Union 2008, 34, 3–30. [Google Scholar]
  21. Su, B.; Heshmati, A.; Geng, Y.; Yu, X. A review of the circular economy in China: Moving from rhetoric to implementation. J. Clean. Prod. 2013, 42, 215–227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Al-Salem, S.M.; Lettieri, P.; Baeyens, J. Recycling and recovery routes of plastic solid waste (PSW): A review. Waste Manag. 2009, 29, 2625–2643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Birat, J.-P. Life-cycle assessment, resource efficiency and recycling. Met. Res. Technol. 2015, 112, 206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Lazarevic, D.; Aoustin, E.; Buclet, N.; Brandt, N. Plastic waste management in the context of a European recycling society: Comparing results and uncertainties in a life cycle perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2010, 55, 246–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Potting, J.; Hekkert, M.; Worrell, E.; Hanemaaijer, A. Circular Economy: Measuring Innovation in the Product Chain—Policy Report. 2017. Available online: http://www.pbl.nl/sites/default/files/cms/publicaties/pbl-2016-circular-economy-measuring-innovation-in-product-chains-2544.pdf (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  26. European Commission. Circular Economy Principles for Buildings Design. 2020. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/docsroom/documents/39984 (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  27. Hossain, M.U.; Ng, S.T.; Antwi-Afari, P.; Amor, B. Circular economy and the construction industry: Existing trends, challenges and prospective framework for sustainable construction. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2020, 130, 109948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Campbell, A. Mass timber in the circular economy: Paradigm in practice? Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Eng. Sustain. 2018, 172, 141–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Antonini, E.; Boeri, A.; Lauria, M.; Giglio, F. Reversibility and durability as potential indicators for circular building technologies. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Van den Berg, M.; Voordijk, H.; Adriaanse, A. Recovering building elements for reuse (or not)—Ethnographic insights into selective demolition practices. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 256, 120332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Mesa, J.; González-Quiroga, A.; Maury, H. Developing an indicator for material selection based on durability and environmental footprint: A Circular Economy perspective. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 160, 104887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Cheshire, D. What principles of the circular economy can be carried across to the built environment? In Build Circular Learning Hub; EcoBuild: London, UK, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  33. Gálvez-Martos, J.-L.; Styles, D.; Schoenberger, H.; Zeschmar-Lahl, B. Construction and demolition waste best management practice in Europe. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 136, 166–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. European Commision. Circular Economy—Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. 2017. Available online: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/index_en.htm (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  35. Rahla, K.M.; Bragança, L.; Mateus, R. Obstacles and barriers for measuring building’s circularity. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Cuenca-Moyano, G.M.; Martín-Morales, M.; Bonoli, A.; Valverde-Palacios, I. Environmental assessment of masonry mortars made with natural and recycled aggregates. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2019, 24, 191–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mantalovas, K.; Di Mino, G. Integrating circularity in the sustainability assessment of asphalt mixtures. Sustainability 2020, 12, 594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Nußholz, J.L.K.; Nygaard Rasmussen, F.; Milios, L. Circular building materials: Carbon saving potential and the role of business model innovation and public policy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141, 308–316. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Bragança, L. Portugal SB07 Sustainable Construction, Materials and Practices: Challenge of the Industry for the New Millennium; IOS Press: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2007. [Google Scholar]
  40. Ros-Dosdá, T.; Celades, I.; Vilalta, L.; Fullana-i-Palmer, P.; Monfort, E. Environmental comparison of indoor floor coverings. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 693, 133519. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Nassar, K.; Thabet, W.; Beliveau, Y. A procedure for multi-criteria selection of building assemblies. Autom. Constr. 2003, 12, 543–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Milani, A.S.; Eskicioglu, C.; Robles, K.; Bujun, K.; Hosseini-Nasab, H. Multiple criteria decision making with life cycle assessment for material selection of composites. Express Polym. Lett. 2011, 5, 1062–1074. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Akadiri, P.O.; Olomolaiye, P.O. Development of sustainable assessment criteria for building materials selection. Eng. Constr. Archit. Manag. 2012, 19, 666–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Jeanjean, A.; Olives, R.; Py, X. Selection criteria of thermal mass materials for low-energy building construction applied to conventional and alternative materials. Energy Build. 2013, 63, 36–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Govindan, K.; Shankar, K.M.; Kannan, D. Sustainable material selection for construction industry—A hybrid multi criteria decision making approach. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2016, 55, 1274–1288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Mahmoudkelaye, S.; Azari, K.T.; Pourvaziri, M.; Asadian, E. Sustainable material selection for building enclosure through ANP method. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2018, 9, e00200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Zari, M.P. Ecosystem services impacts as part of building materials selection criteria. Mater. Today Sustain. 2019, 3–4, 100010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Reddy, A.S.; Kumar, P.R.; Raj, P.A. Preference based multi-criteria framework for developing a Sustainable Material Performance Index (SMPI). Int. J. Sustain. Eng. 2019, 12, 390–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eberhardt, L.C.M.; Birkved, M.; Birgisdottir, H. Building design and construction strategies for a circular economy. Arch. Eng. Des. Manag. 2020, 1–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Merli, R.; Preziosi, M.; Acampora, A.; Lucchetti, M.C.; Petrucci, E. Recycled fibers in reinforced concrete: A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. European Commission. Closing the Loop—An EU Action Plan for the Circular Economy. 2015. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52015DC0614 (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  52. EU Circular Economy Action Plan: A New Circular Economy Action Plan for a Cleaner and More Competitive Europe. 2021. Available online: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/circular-economy/ (accessed on 21 March 2021).
  53. Ellen MacArthur Foundation. Delivering the Circular Economy: A Toolkit for Policymakers; Ellen MacArthur Foundation: Cowes, UK, 2015; Volume 177. [Google Scholar]
  54. Silva, R.V.; de Brito, J.; Dhir, R.K. Use of recycled aggregates arising from construction and demolition waste in new construction applications. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 236, 117629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Tingley, D.D.; Cooper, S.; Cullen, J. Understanding and overcoming the barriers to structural steel reuse, a UK perspective. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 148, 642–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Smol, M.; Kulczycka, J.; Henclik, A.; Gorazda, K.; Wzorek, Z. The possible use of sewage sludge ash (SSA) in the construction industry as a way towards a circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2015, 95, 45–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Jiménez-Rivero, A.; García-Navarro, J. Indicators to Measure the Management Performance of End-of-Life Gypsum: From Deconstruction to Production of Recycled Gypsum. Waste Biomass Valorization 2016, 7, 913–927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Zabek, M.; Hildebrand, L.; Wirth, M.; Brell-Cokcan, S. Used building materials as secondary resources—Identification of valuable building material and automized deconstruction. J. Facade Des. Eng. 2017, 5, 25–33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lederer, J.; Trinkel, V.; Fellner, J. Wide-scale utilization of MSWI fly ashes in cement production and its impact on average heavy metal contents in cements: The case of Austria. Waste Manag. 2017, 60, 247–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Díaz-García, A.; Martínez-García, C.; Cotes-Palomino, T. Properties of residue from olive oil extraction as a raw material for sustainable construction materials: Part I: Physical properties. Materials 2017, 10, 100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Pauliuk, S.; Kondo, Y.; Nakamura, S.; Nakajima, K. Regional distribution and losses of end-of-life steel throughout multiple product life cycles—Insights from the global multiregional MaTrace model. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2017, 116, 84–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  62. Schiller, G.; Gruhler, K.; Ortlepp, R. Continuous Material Flow Analysis Approach for Bulk Nonmetallic Mineral Building Materials Applied to the German Building Sector. J. Ind. Ecol. 2017, 21, 673–688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Hossain, M.U.; Ng, S.T. Critical consideration of buildings’ environmental impact assessment towards adoption of circular economy: An analytical review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 205, 763–780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Husgafvel, R.; Linkosalmi, L.; Hughes, M.; Kanerva, J.; Dahl, O. Forest sector circular economy development in Finland: A regional study on sustainability driven competitive advantage and an assessment of the potential for cascading recovered solid wood. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 181, 483–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Rossetti, M.; Bin, A. Development of soundproofing and sound-absorbing bituminous membranes containing recycled materials. TECHNE J. Technol. Arch. Environ. 2018, 16, 281–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Minunno, R.; O’Grady, T.; Morrison, G.; Gruner, R.; Colling, M. Strategies for Applying the Circular Economy to Prefabricated Buildings. Buildings 2018, 8, 125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  67. López-Uceda, A.; Galvín, A.P.; Ayuso, J.; Jiménez, J.R.; Vanwalleghem, T.; Peña, A. Risk assessment by percolation leaching tests of extensive green roofs with fine fraction of mixed recycled aggregates from construction and demolition waste. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2018, 25, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Adams, K.T.; Osmani, M.; Thorpe, T.; Thornback, J. Circular economy in construction: Current awareness, challenges and enablers. Proc. Inst. Civ. Eng. Waste Resour. Manag. 2017, 170, 15–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Basti, A. Sustainable management of debris from the L’Aquila earthquake: Environmental strategies and impact assessment. Detritus 2018, 2, 112–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Lozano-Miralles, J.A.; Hermoso-Orzáez, M.J.; Martínez-García, C.; Rojas-Sola, J.I. Comparative study on the environmental impact of traditional clay bricks mixed with organic waste using life cycle analysis. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2917. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Sanchez, B.; Haas, C. Capital project planning for a circular economy. Constr. Manag. Econ. 2018, 36, 303–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Rose, C.M.; Bergsagel, D.; Dufresne, T.; Unubreme, E.; Lyu, T.; Duffour, P.; Stegemann, J.A. Cross-laminated secondary timber: Experimental testing and modelling the effect of defects and reduced feedstock properties. Sustainability 2018, 10, 4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ghisellini, P.; Ripa, M.; Ulgiati, S. Exploring environmental and economic costs and benefits of a circular economy approach to the construction and demolition sector. A literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 178, 618–643. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Wong, Y.C.; Al-Obaidi, K.M.; Mahyuddin, N. Recycling of end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) for building products: Concept of processing framework from automotive to construction industries in Malaysia. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 190, 285–302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Migliore, M.; Carpinella, M.; Paganin, G.; Paolieri, F.; Talamo, C. Innovative use of scrap and waste deriving from the stone and the construction sector for the manufacturing of bricks. Review of the international scenario and analysis of an Italian case study. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2018, 17, 2507–2514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Menéndez-Aguado, L.D.; Sánchez, M.M.; Rodríguez, M.A.; Velázquez, A.L.C.; Menéndez-Aguado, J.M. Recycled mineral raw materials from quarry waste using hydrocyclones. Materials 2019, 12, 2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  77. Mondal, M.K.; Bose, B.P.; Bansal, P. Recycling waste thermoplastic for energy efficient construction materials: An experimental investigation. J. Environ. Manag. 2019, 240, 119–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Hertwich, E.G.; Ali, S.; Ciacci, L.; Fishman, T.; Heeren, N.; Masanet, E.; Asghari, F.N.; Olivetti, E.; Pauliuk, S.; Tu, Q.; et al. Material efficiency strategies to reducing greenhouse gas emissions associated with buildings, vehicles, and electronics—A review. Environ. Res. Lett. 2019, 14, 043004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Ghaffar, S.H.; Burman, M.; Braimah, N. Pathways to circular construction: An integrated management of construction and demolition waste for resource recovery. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 244, 118710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Hossain, M.U.; Ng, S.T. Influence of waste materials on buildings’ life cycle environmental impacts: Adopting resource recovery principle. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 142, 10–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Brütting, J.; Desruelle, J.; Senatore, G.; Fivet, C. Design of Truss Structures through Reuse. Structures 2019, 18, 128–137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Saeli, M.; Tobaldi, D.M.; Seabra, M.P.; Labrincha, J.A. Mix design and mechanical performance of geopolymeric binders and mortars using biomass fly ash and alkaline effluent from paper-pulp industry. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 208, 1188–1197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Eberhardt, L.C.M.; Birgisdóttir, H.; Birkved, M. Life cycle assessment of a Danish office building designed for disassembly. Build. Res. Inf. 2019, 47, 666–680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Ruiz, L.A.L.; Ramón, X.R.; Domingo, S.G. The circular economy in the construction and demolition waste sector—A review and an integrative model approach. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 248, 119238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Brambilla, G.; Lavagna, M.; Vasdravellis, G.; Castiglioni, C.A. Environmental benefits arising from demountable steel-concrete composite floor systems in buildings. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141, 133–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Noll, D.; Wiedenhofer, D.; Miatto, A.; Singh, S.J. The expansion of the built environment, waste generation and EU recycling targets on Samothraki, Greece: An island’s dilemma. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 150, 104405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Rios, F.C.; Grau, D.; Chong, W.K. Reusing exterior wall framing systems: A cradle-to-cradle comparative life cycle assessment. Waste Manag. 2019, 94, 120–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Gan, V.J.L.; Lo, I.M.C.; Ma, J.; Tse, K.T.; Cheng, J.C.P.; Chan, C.M. Simulation optimisation towards energy efficient green buildings: Current status and future trends. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 254, 120012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Zhao, Z.; Courard, L.; Groslambert, S.; Jehin, T.; Leonard, A.; Xiao, J. Use of recycled concrete aggregates from precast block for the production of new building blocks: An industrial scale study. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 157, 104786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Heisel, F.; Rau-Oberhuber, S. Calculation and evaluation of circularity indicators for the built environment using the case studies of UMAR and Madaster. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 243, 118482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Sanchez, B.; Esfahani, M.E.; Haas, C. A methodology to analyze the net environmental impacts and building’s cost performance of an adaptive reuse project: A case study of the Waterloo County Courthouse renovations. Environ. Syst. Decis. 2019, 39, 419–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Lozano-Lunar, A.; Raposeiro da Silva, P.; de Brito, J.; Fernández, J.M.; Jiménez, J.R. Safe use of electric arc furnace dust as secondary raw material in self-compacting mortars production. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 211, 1375–1388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Pavlíková, M.; Zemanová, L.; Záleská, M.; Pokorný, J.; Lojka, M.; Jankovský, O.; Pavlík, Z. Ternary blended binder for production of a novel type of lightweight repair mortar. Materials 2019, 12, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  94. Limami, H.; Manssouri, I.; Cherkaoui, K.; Khaldoun, A. Study of the suitability of unfired clay bricks with polymeric HDPE & PET wastes additives as a construction material. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 27, 100956. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Orsini, F.; Marrone, P. Approaches for a low-carbon production of building materials: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 241, 118380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mihai, F.C. Construction and demolition waste in romania: The route from illegal dumping to building materials. Sustainability 2019, 11, 3179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Honic, M.; Kovacic, I.; Rechberger, H. Improving the recycling potential of buildings through Material Passports (MP): An Austrian case study. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 217, 787–797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Ricciardi, P.; Cillari, G.; Carnevale Miino, M.; Collivignarelli, M.C. Valorization of agro-industry residues in the building and environmental sector: A review. Waste Manag. Res. 2020, 38, 487–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Munaro, M.R.; Tavares, S.F.; Bragança, L. Towards circular and more sustainable buildings: A systematic literature review on the circular economy in the built environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 121134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Aslam, M.S.; Huang, B.; Cui, L. Review of construction and demolition waste management in China and USA. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 264, 110445. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  101. Palmieri, S.; Cipolletta, G.; Pastore, C.; Giosuè, C.; Akyol, Ç.; Eusebi, A.L.; Frison, N.; Tittarelli, F.; Fatone, F. Pilot scale cellulose recovery from sewage sludge and reuse in building and construction material. Waste Manag. 2019, 100, 208–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Arora, M.; Raspall, F.; Cheah, L.; Silva, A. Buildings and the circular economy: Estimating urban mining, recovery and reuse potential of building components. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 154, 104581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Rivero, A.J.; Sathre, R.; Navarro, J.G. Life cycle energy and material flow implications of gypsum plasterboard recycling in the European Union. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2016, 108, 171–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Sierra-Pérez, J.; García-Pérez, S.; Blanc, S.; Boschmonart-Rives, J.; Gabarrell, X. The use of forest-based materials for the efficient energy of cities: Environmental and economic implications of cork as insulation material. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 37, 628–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Ghisellini, P.; Ji, X.; Liu, G.; Ulgiati, S. Evaluating the transition towards cleaner production in the construction and demolition sector of China: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 195, 418–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Benachio, G.L.F.; Freitas, M.D.C.D.; Tavares, S.F. Circular economy in the construction industry: A systematic literature review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 260, 121046. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Cai, G.; Waldmann, D. A material and component bank to facilitate material recycling and component reuse for a sustainable construction: Concept and preliminary study. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 2015–2032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Lozano-Lunar, A.; Barbudo, A.; Fernández, J.M.; Jiménez, J.R. Promotion of circular economy: Steelwork dusts as secondary raw material in conventional mortars. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 27, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Giama, E.; Papadopoulos, A.M. Benchmarking carbon footprint and circularity in production processes: The case of stonewool and extruded polysterene. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 257, 120559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Bertin, I.; Mesnil, R.; Jaeger, J.M.; Feraille, A.; Le Roy, R. A BIM-based framework and databank for reusing load-bearing structural elements. Sustainability 2020, 12, 3147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Nunes, K.R.A.; Mahler, C.F. Comparison of construction and demolition waste management between Brazil, European Union and USA. Waste Manag. Res. 2020, 38, 415–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Hahladakis, J.N.; Purnell, P.; Aljabri, H.M.S.J. Assessing the role and use of recycled aggregates in the sustainable management of construction and demolition waste via a mini-review and a case study. Waste Manag. Res. 2020, 38, 460–471. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Jayasinghe, L.B.; Waldmann, D. Development of a bim-based web tool as a material and component bank for a sustainable construction industry. Sustainability 2020, 12, 1766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Guo, J.; Fishman, T.; Wang, Y.; Miatto, A.; Wuyts, W.; Zheng, L.; Wang, H.; Tanikawa, H. Urban development and sustainability challenges chronicled by a century of construction material flows and stocks in Tiexi, China. J. Ind. Ecol. 2020, 25, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Mercader-Moyano, P.; Esquivias, P.M. Decarbonization and circular economy in the sustainable development and renovation of buildings and neighbourhoods. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. De Wolf, C.; Hoxha, E.; Fivet, C. Comparison of environmental assessment methods when reusing building components: A case study. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2020, 61, 102322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Lederer, J.; Gassner, A.; Kleemann, F.; Fellner, J. Potentials for a circular economy of mineral construction materials and demolition waste in urban areas: A case study from Vienna. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 161, 104942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Kurańska, M.; Leszczyńska, M.; Malewska, E.; Prociak, A.; Ryszkowska, J. Implementation of circular economy principles in the synthesis of polyurethane foams. Polymers 2020, 12, 2068. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Pujadas-Gispert, E.; Alsailani, M.; van Dijk, K.C.A.; Rozema, A.D.K.; ten Hoope, J.P.; Korevaar, C.C.; Moonen, S.P.G. Design, construction, and thermal performance evaluation of an innovative bio-based ventilated façade. Front. Archit. Res. 2020, 9, 681–696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Moreno-Juez, J.; Vegas, I.J.; Gebremariam, A.T.; García-Cortés, V.; Di Maio, F. Treatment of end-of-life concrete in an innovative heating-air classification system for circular cement-based products. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Kakkos, E.; Heisel, F.; Hebel, D.E.; Hischier, R. Towards urban mining-estimating the potential environmental benefits by applying an alternative construction practice: A case study from Switzerland. Sustainability 2020, 12, 5041. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bertolini, M.; Guardigli, L. Upcycling shipping containers as building components: An environmental impact assessment. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020, 25, 947–963. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Boer, D.; Segarra, M.; Fernández, A.I.; Vallès, M.; Mateu, C.; Cabeza, L.F. Approach for the analysis of TES technologies aiming towards a circular economy: Case study of building-like cubicles. Renew. Energy 2020, 150, 589–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Ramírez, C.P.; Barriguete, A.V.; Muñoz, J.G.; del Río Merino, M.; del Solar Serrano, P. Ecofibers for the reinforcement of cement mortars for coating promoting the circular economy. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Rakhshan, K.; Morel, J.C.; Alaka, H.; Charef, R. Components reuse in the building sector—A systematic review. Waste Manag. Res. 2020, 38, 347–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  126. Drochytka, R.; Dufek, Z.; Michalčíková, M.; Hodul, J. Study of possibilities of using special types of building and demolition waste in civil engineering. Period. Polytech. Civ. Eng. 2020, 64, 304–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Huuhka, S.; Vestergaard, I. Building conservation and the circular economy: A theoretical consideration. J. Cult. Herit. Manag. Sustain. Dev. 2019, 10, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Volk, R.; Müller, R.; Reinhardt, J.; Schultmann, F. An Integrated Material Flows, Stakeholders and Policies Approach to Identify and Exploit Regional Resource Potentials. Ecol. Econ. 2019, 161, 292–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Mollaei, A.; Ibrahim, N.; Habib, K. Estimating the construction material stocks in two canadian cities: A case study of Kitchener and Waterloo. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 280, 124501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Finch, G.; Marriage, G.; Pelosi, A.; Gjerde, M. Building envelope systems for the circular economy; Evaluation parameters, current performance and key challenges. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2021, 64, 102561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Eberhardt, L.C.M.; Rønholt, J.; Birkved, M.; Birgisdottir, H. Circular Economy potential within the building stock—Mapping the embodied greenhouse gas emissions of four Danish examples. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 33, 101845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Cottafava, D.; Ritzen, M. Circularity indicator for residentials buildings: Addressing the gap between embodied impacts and design aspects. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2021, 164, 105120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Joensuu, T.; Edelman, H.; Saari, A. Circular economy practices in the built environment. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 276, 124215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Fořt, J.; Černý, R. Transition to circular economy in the construction industry: Environmental aspects of waste brick recycling scenarios. Waste Manag. 2020, 118, 510–520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Frankovič, A.; Ducman, V.; Dolenec, S.; Panizza, M.; Tamburini, S.; Natali, M.; Pappa, M.; Tsoutis, C.; Bernardi, A. Up-scaling and performance assessment of façade panels produced from construction and demolition waste using alkali activation technology. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 262, 120475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Ajayebi, A.; Hopkinson, P.; Zhou, K.; Lam, D.; Chen, H.M.; Wang, Y. Spatiotemporal model to quantify stocks of building structural products for a prospective circular economy. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 162, 105026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Collivignarelli, M.C.; Cillari, G.; Ricciardi, P.; Miino, M.C.; Torretta, V.; Rada, E.C.; Abbà, A. The production of sustainable concrete with the use of alternative aggregates: A review. Sustainability 2020, 12, 7903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Lim, Y.C.; Shih, Y.J.; Tsai, K.C.; Yang, W.D.; Chen, C.W.; Dong, C.D. Recycling dredged harbor sediment to construction materials by sintering with steel slag and waste glass: Characteristics, alkali-silica reactivity and metals stability. J. Environ. Manag. 2020, 270, 110869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  139. Abbasi, S.; Jannaty, M.H.; Faraj, R.H.; Shahbazpanahi, S.; Mosavi, A. The Effect of Incorporating Silica Stone Waste on the Mechanical Properties of Sustainable Concretes. Materials 2020, 13, 3832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  140. Marcellus-Zamora, K.A.; Gallagher, P.M.; Spatari, S. Can Public Construction and Demolition Data Describe Trends in Building Material Recycling? Observations from Philadelphia. Front. Built Environ. 2020, 6, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Muñoz-Ruiperez, C.; Oliván, F.F.; Carpintero, V.C.; Santamaría-Vicario, I.; Sáiz, Á.R. Mechanical behavior of a composite lightweight slab, consisting of a laminated wooden joist and ecological mortar. Materials 2020, 13, 2575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Chien, C.Y.; Show, K.Y.; Huang, C.; Chang, Y.J.; Lee, D.J. Effects of sodium salt additive to produce ultra lightweight aggregates from industrial sludge-marine clay mix: Laboratory trials. J. Taiwan Inst. Chem. Eng. 2020, 111, 105–109. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Briones-Llorente, R.; Barbosa, R.; Almeida, M.; García, E.A.M.; Saiz, Á.R. Ecological design of new efficient energy-performance construction materials with rigid polyurethane foam waste. Polymers 2020, 12, 1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Meek, A.H.; Beckett, C.T.S.; Elchalakani, M. Alternative stabilised rammed earth materials incorporating recycled waste and industrial by-products: Durability with and without water repellent. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 265, 120997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Tazi, N.; Idir, R.; Ben Fraj, A. Towards achieving circularity in residential building materials: Potential stock, locks and opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 281, 124489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Rajib, A.I.; Samieadel, A.; Zalghout, A.; Kaloush, K.E.; Sharma, B.K.; Fini, E.H. Do all rejuvenators improve asphalt performance? Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2020, 38, 1–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Luciano, A.; Cutaia, L.; Cioffi, F.; Sinibaldi, C. Demolition and construction recycling unified management: The DECORUM platform for improvement of resource efficiency in the construction sector. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2020, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Cifrian, E.; Coronado, M.; Quijorna, N.; Alonso-Santurde, R.; Andrés, A. Waelz slag-based construction ceramics: Effect of the trial scale on technological and environmental properties. J. Mater. Cycles Waste Manag. 2019, 21, 1437–1448. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Villoria Sáez, P.; del Río Merino, M.; Atanes Sánchez, E.; Santa Cruz Astorqui, J.; Porras-Amores, C. Viability of Gypsum Composites with Addition of Glass Waste for Applications in Construction. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2019, 31, 4018403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Migliore, M. Circular economy and upcycling of waste and pre-consumer scraps in construction sector. The role of information to facilitate the exchange of resources through a virtual marketplace. Environ. Eng. Manag. J. 2019, 18, 2297–2303. [Google Scholar]
  151. Lyubenova, T.S.; Fraga, D.; Castelló, J.B.C.; Kozhukharov, V.; Machkova, M.S. Multifunctional smart coatings on novel ceramics and glassceramic substrates in the context of the circular economy. J. Chem. Technol. Metall. 2018, 53, 1103–1116. [Google Scholar]
  152. Akanbi, L.A.; Oyedele, L.O.; Akinade, O.O.; Ajayi, A.O.; Delgado, M.D.; Bilal, M.; Bello, S.A. Salvaging building materials in a circular economy: A BIM-based whole-life performance estimator. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 129, 175–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Stephan, A.; Athanassiadis, A. Towards a more circular construction sector: Estimating and spatialising current and future non-structural material replacement flows to maintain urban building stocks. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2018, 129, 248–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Wuyts, W.; Miatto, A.; Sedlitzky, R.; Tanikawa, H. Extending or ending the life of residential buildings in Japan: A social circular economy approach to the problem of short-lived constructions. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 660–670. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Lăzăroiu, G.; Ionescu, L.; Uţă, C.; Hurloiu, I.; Andronie, M.; Dijmarescu, I. Environmentally responsible behavior and sustainability policy adoption in green public procurement. Sustainability 2020, 12, 2110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Ortlepp, R.; Gruhler, K.; Schiller, G. Material stocks in Germany’s non-domestic buildings: A new quantification method. Build. Res. Inf. 2016, 44, 840–862. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Akanbi, L.A.; Oyedele, L.O.; Omoteso, K.; Bilal, M.; Akinade, O.O.; Ajayi, A.O.; Delgado, J.M.D.; Owolabi, H.A. Disassembly and deconstruction analytics system (D-DAS) for construction in a circular economy. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 223, 386–396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Akinade, O.O.; Oyedele, L.O. Integrating construction supply chains within a circular economy: An ANFIS-based waste analytics system (A-WAS). J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 229, 863–873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Campbell-Johnston, K.; ten Cate, J.; Elfering-Petrovic, M.; Gupta, J. City level circular transitions: Barriers and limits in Amsterdam, Utrecht and The Hague. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 235, 1232–1239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Štulović, M.; Radovanović, D.; Kamberović, Ž.; Korać, M.; Anđić, Z. Assessment of leaching characteristics of solidified products containing secondary alkaline lead slag. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2019, 16, 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Pecorino, F.; Rametta, S.; Sapiente, D.; Squillaci, C.; Matarazzo, A.; Donato, A. Ecodesign applied to real estate market: Cost benefits analisys. Proc. Environ. Sci. Eng. Manag. 2018, 5, 167–174. [Google Scholar]
  162. Minunno, R.; O’Grady, T.; Morrison, G.M.; Gruner, R.L. Exploring environmental benefits of reuse and recycle practices: A circular economy case study of a modular building. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2020, 160, 104855. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Lanau, M.; Liu, G. Developing an Urban Resource Cadaster for Circular Economy: A Case of Odense, Denmark. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2020, 54, 4675–4685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Heller, N.; Flamme, S. Waste management of deconstructed External Thermal Insulation Composite Systems with expanded polystyrene in the future. Waste Manag. Res. 2020, 38, 400–407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Ratnasabapathy, S.; Alashwal, A.; Perera, S. Investigation of waste diversion rates in the construction and demolition sector in Australia. Built Environ. Proj. Asset Manag. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Lausselet, C.; Urrego, J.P.F.; Resch, E.; Brattebø, H. Temporal analysis of the material flows and embodied greenhouse gas emissions of a neighborhood building stock. J. Ind. Ecol. 2020, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Marzouk, M.; Elmaraghy, A.; Voordijk, H. Lean deconstruction approach for buildings demolition processes using BIM. Lean Constr. J. 2019, 2019, 147–173. [Google Scholar]
  168. Pavlović, M.; Veljković, M. FE validation of push-out tests: Using bolts as shear connectors. Steel Constr. 2017, 10, 135–144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Ali, A.K.; Kio, P.N.; Alvarado, J.; Wang, Y. Symbiotic Circularity in Buildings: An Alternative Path for Valorizing Sheet Metal Waste Stream as Metal Building Facades. Waste Biomass Valorization 2020, 11, 7127–7145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Nuñez-Cacho, P.; Górecki, J.; Molina-Moreno, V.; Corpas-Iglesias, F.A. What gets measured, gets done: Development of a Circular Economy measurement scale for building industry. Sustainability 2018, 10, 2340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  171. Jaskowska-Lemańska, J.; Sagan, J. Non-Destructive Testing Methods as a Main Tool Supporting Effective Waste Management in Construction Processes. Arch. Civ. Eng. 2019, 65, 263–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The methodology of the study.
Figure 1. The methodology of the study.
Infrastructures 06 00049 g001
Figure 2. Temporal analysis of the selected papers.
Figure 2. Temporal analysis of the selected papers.
Infrastructures 06 00049 g002
Figure 3. Spatial analysis of the selected papers.
Figure 3. Spatial analysis of the selected papers.
Infrastructures 06 00049 g003
Figure 4. Sources analysis.
Figure 4. Sources analysis.
Infrastructures 06 00049 g004
Figure 5. Materials and components selection criteria according to selected literature.
Figure 5. Materials and components selection criteria according to selected literature.
Infrastructures 06 00049 g005
Table 1. R-list strategies to ensure a shift towards a Circular Economy (CE) (adapted from [22]).
Table 1. R-list strategies to ensure a shift towards a Circular Economy (CE) (adapted from [22]).
R-List ApproachAction
R0 RefuseDepreciate a product with harmful impacts and proposing a different one with identical or better functions and fewer impacts.
R1 RethinkIntensify the product use and adopt smarter strategies as sharing economy or products with multiple functions.
R2 ReduceDecrease virgin materials and energy consumption while enhancing efficiency.
R3 ReuseReuse an abandoned product that keeps the same functions by another user.
R4 RepairFix a defective product to give back its initial performance.
R5 RefurbishRenovate an outdated product to make it as a new one.
R6 Remanufacture Make a product using parts from a damaged product that had the same functions.
R7 Repurpose Make a product using parts from a damaged product that had different functions.
R8 RecycleInclude, into the manufacturing process of a product, materials that reached their end-of-life use to make materials with same, higher (upcycle), or lower (downcycle) qualities.
R9 RecoverA process of retrieving heat, electricity, or fuel from non-recyclable materials by incineration.
Table 2. Findings of materials and components criteria according to CE in the literature.
Table 2. Findings of materials and components criteria according to CE in the literature.
CE StrategyDescriptionRelated Research
Recycled or recovered contentReduction of the input of virgin materials content and partially rely on recycled or recovered waste.[2,5,6,19,27,28,29,30,36,38,40,49,50,54,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63,64,65,66,67,68,69,70,71,72,73,74,75,76,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98,99,100,101,102,103,104,105,106,107,108,109,110,111,112,113,114,115,116,117,118,119,120,121,122,123,124,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,135,136,137,138,139,140,141,142,143,144,145,146,147,148,149,150,151]110
RecyclabilityThe ability of a material to be recyclable through a particular process at its end-of-life.[5,6,19,27,28,29,30,40,49,57,58,59,62,63,64,66,67,68,71,72,73,74,78,79,80,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,95,96,97,99,100,102,103,104,105,106,107,109,110,111,112,113,114,116,117,119,120,121,123,125,126,127,128,129,130,131,132,133,134,136,140,145,147,150,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,160,161,162,163,164,165,166,167]85
ReusabilityThe capability of materials to be reusable at their end-of-life and thus providing the building elements a second life.[5,6,19,27,28,29,30,49,55,58,63,64,66,68,71,72,73,74,78,79,80,81,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,95,96,97,99,100,102,105,106,107,110,112,113,114,116,117,119,121,125,127,130,131,132,133,136,152,153,154,155,156,157,158,159,161,162,163,165,166,167,168,169]71
Ease of deconstructionThe selected materials facilitate different design strategies to adopt reversibility such as: adaptability, disassembly, while undergoing little to no damage.[27,29,30,49,55,58,66,68,81,83,85,87,91,99,102,105,107,110,113,116,119,125,130,132,133,152,154,157,162,167,168]31
MaintainabilityThis feature characterizes materials and components that can be kept in use with through maintenance, repair, and refurbishment.[6,27,40,49,68,71,84,107,127,129,133,167]12
DurabilityThe resistance of materials and components to deterioration over time while meeting the minimal requirements[6,27,28,29,30,49,78,89,90,99,107,112,113,130,137,156,169]17
Energy recoverabilityThe potential of converting building materials and components to energy by incineration.[6,28,49,71,80,83,84,85,90,110,116,127,131,133,157,165]16
Upcycling potentialRe-introducing the materials and components in the loop for a higher value[5,58,63,72,95,102,130,166,169]9
BiodegradabilityThe ability of disintegrating the building elements to the natural environment with no ecological damage[29,90]2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rahla, K.M.; Mateus, R.; Bragança, L. Selection Criteria for Building Materials and Components in Line with the Circular Economy Principles in the Built Environment—A Review of Current Trends. Infrastructures 2021, 6, 49. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/infrastructures6040049

AMA Style

Rahla KM, Mateus R, Bragança L. Selection Criteria for Building Materials and Components in Line with the Circular Economy Principles in the Built Environment—A Review of Current Trends. Infrastructures. 2021; 6(4):49. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/infrastructures6040049

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rahla, Kamel Mohamed, Ricardo Mateus, and Luís Bragança. 2021. "Selection Criteria for Building Materials and Components in Line with the Circular Economy Principles in the Built Environment—A Review of Current Trends" Infrastructures 6, no. 4: 49. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/infrastructures6040049

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop