Next Article in Journal
Internal Strain Distribution of Laser Lap Joints in Steel under Loading Studied by High-Energy Synchrotron Radiation X-rays
Next Article in Special Issue
Effect of 1.5 MeV Proton Irradiation on Superconductivity in FeSe0.5Te0.5 Thin Films
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Effects of Beam Conditions in Ground Irradiation Tests on Degradation of Photovoltaic Characteristics of Space Solar Cells
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Modification of Critical Current Density Anisotropy in High-Tc Superconductors by Using Heavy-Ion Irradiations

by Tetsuro Sueyoshi
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Submission received: 21 March 2021 / Revised: 17 May 2021 / Accepted: 18 May 2021 / Published: 21 May 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The author summarises his previously published work about the effect of heavy ion irradiation at different incidence angle combinations on the anisotropy of the critical current density in YBCO and GdBCO.

The summary is well written except for a few minor shortcomings.
However, the manuscript falls short as a review article as it does not include the work of other authors (e.g. on other high-Tc materials and/or other ion species), lacks aspects such as the dependence on fluence or the effects on the critical temperature, etc.

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Reviewer 2 Report

The author reviews the recent results about the modification of the Jc properties in
REBCO thin films and coated conductors were obtained by using heavy-ion irradiations under various irradiation conditions.  The topic is very interesting and the manuscript discusses deeply the science behind it.   I have small questions regarding their assumptions. However, overall, I believe that this manuscript is a valuable contribution to the literature and, once my comments below are adequately addressed, should be published.

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The manuscript is a well written summary of the authors previous work and all questions have been addressed sufficiently.

However, I would expect a more broad overview in a review paper.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.docx

Back to TopTop