Next Article in Journal
Innovative Carbon-Doped Composite Pavements with Sensing Capability and Low Environmental Impact for Multifunctional Infrastructures
Previous Article in Journal
Recent Advances in Two-Dimensional Transition Metal Dichalcogenide Nanocomposites Biosensors for Virus Detection before and during COVID-19 Outbreak
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
J. Compos. Sci.
Volume 5
Issue 7
10.3390/jcs5070191
jcs-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Tensile Strength of Monolithic Epoxy with Highly Dispersed TiO2-Graphene Nanocomposites

by
Yanshuai Wang
1,*,
Siyao Guo
2,
Biqin Dong
1 and
Feng Xing
1
1
Guangdong Province Key Laboratory of Durability for Marine Civil Engineering, College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
2
Cooperative Innovation Center of Engineering Construction and Safety in Shandong Blue Economic Zone, School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5(7), 191; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcs5070191
Submission received: 24 June 2021 / Revised: 12 July 2021 / Accepted: 15 July 2021 / Published: 18 July 2021
Browse Figures
Review Reports Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The functionalization of graphene has been reported widely, showing special physical and chemical properties. However, due to the lack of surface functional groups, the poor dispersibility of graphene in solvents strongly limits its engineering applications. This paper develops a novel green “in-situ titania intercalation” method to prepare a highly dispersed graphene, which is enabled by the generation of the titania precursor between the layer of graphene at room temperature to yield titania-graphene nanocomposites (TiO2-RGO). The precursor of titania will produce amounts of nano titania between the graphene interlayers, which can effectively resist the interfacial van der Waals force of the interlamination in graphene for improved dispersion state. Such highly dispersed TiO2-RGO nanocomposites were used to modify epoxy resin. Surprisingly, significant enhancement of the mechanical performance of epoxy resin was observed when incorporating the titania-graphene nanocomposites, especially the improvements in tensile strength and elongation at break, with 75.54% and 176.61% increases at optimal usage compared to the pure epoxy, respectively. The approach presented herein is easy and economical for industry production, which can be potentially applied to the research of high mechanical property graphene/epoxy composite system.

1. Introduction

Graphene is considered one of the most powerful materials in the 21st century because of its unique sp2 and honeycomb structures [1]. Such molecular structures empower the graphene materials with excellent mechanical [2], thermal [3], and electrical properties [3] for maximum utilization in various fields, e.g., as transparent conductive films [4,5], sensors [5,6], and clean energy devices [5,7]. Reduced graphene oxide (RGO) is a form of acquisition of graphene which can be obtained from the chemical reduction in graphene oxide (GO) [1]. The RGOs with improved and diverse performances can be produced when the GOs are subjected to various reductors and surface modifiers. Despite these superiorities, the application of graphene is still limited. Due to the strong Van der Waals’ force [8] from the interlayers of graphene, nano-sized graphene is prone to agglomerate with each other. Therefore, dispersion of graphene was always a vital problem in recent studies. In order to achieve well-dispersed and highly-performed graphene for optimal enhancement in the properties of graphene composites, numerous improvements have been conducted in recent years. Generally, using surfactants [9,10,11,12] and solvents [13] are two effective methods for dispersing graphene. The surfactants are expected to modify the graphene by incorporating functional groups or polymers onto the surface of graphene. For example, the sodium cholate as a surfactant enabled the production of the high-quality graphene with a stable and easy film [10]. Additionally, the poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate) (PSS) can be chemically blended with the graphene for good dispersion through surface treatment of the graphene. The PSS-coated graphene exhibited stable and high-efficiency dispersion in any solvent authors used [11]. Some functional groups, nanoparticles and polymers, were employed to react with the graphene to obtain the well-dispersed graphene or graphene derivatives. By introducing SO3- groups onto the surface of graphene, a water-soluble sulfonated graphene was produced, which showed higher electrical conductivity compared to graphite [14]. A facile solution casting method has been used to obtain reduced graphene oxide/alumina (RGO/Al) with better dispersion in carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC) to produce RGO-Al-CMC composites. Such an action significantly improves the tensile strength and toughness of RGO-Al-CMC composites (about 4.3–6.7 times upscaling compared to the control matrix [15]. The employment of an efficient solvent in improving graphene dispersion also has good effects. A liquid-phase exfoliation for the graphene on the basis of compound solvent of ethanol and water has been exploited. No destruction and good dispersibility exhibited in the prepared graphene that showed prospects in the electronic, energy and optical fields [16]. However, the toxicity of the used solvent and surfactant may impact side influences on the performance of the graphene materials [17]. It is imperative to develop other methods for the graphene dispersion without redundant and harmful surfactants.
The epoxy resin (EP) as a common coating material has been extensively applied all over the world. Excellent mechanical properties, adhesion and corrosion resistance largely popularized epoxy resin in many fields, such as civil engineering [18], aerospace [19] and electronic materials [20]. However, the high crosslink of hardened epoxy resin leads to the brittleness and low toughness, which have become major problems that restrict the development and application of the epoxy resin. In recent years, scholars have made a lot of efforts to improve the performance of epoxy resin. Incorporating fibers and nanoparticles to improve the toughness of epoxy resin has led to some achievements. Natural fibers (bamboo fiber [21,22], banana fiber [23] and cellulose fiber [24]), carbon fibers [25,26,27], glass fiber [28], nanoclays [29], carbon nanotubes [30] and nano metal oxides [31] can improve toughness, thermal stability and other performance of epoxy. However, the poor expanding and flexural properties are still the main drawbacks of epoxy resin to be solved presently. It has been reported that graphene can enhance the mechanical performance of epoxy resin [32,33].
In this work, we propose a green and one-step way to obtain the well-dispersed TiO2-RGO nanocomposites, which were further applied in the epoxy resin for the improvement of its mechanical properties. The transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectra and Raman spectra have been utilized to investigate the morphologies of the highly dispersed TiO2-RGO nanocomposites and the titania-graphene-epoxy (TiO2-RGO-EP) composites. The tensile strength and elongation at break of TiO2-RGO-EP composites were measured to verify the efficacy of the graphene on the mechanical performance of the epoxy resin. The result shows that the TiO2-RGO nanocomposites can bridge the cracks during the epoxy curing and tradeoff the tensile impact of the epoxy; the strengthening mechanism of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites on the epoxy resin has been deeply discussed.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

In this work, the raw materials used for producing GO were natural graphite flakes (325 mesh, 99.95% pure), which were purchased from Laixi Carbon Sources Trade Department (Qingdao, China). Other reagents for the oxidation of graphite flakes, such as the concentrated H2SO4 solution with a mass fraction of 98%, HCl solution (mass fraction of 35–36%), NaNO3, KMnO4 and H2, and the solvent (i.e., dimethylbenzene and N-butanol), were all supplied by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The sodium borohydride (NaBH4), anatase titanium oxide (TiO2) and ethanol were all purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). The epoxy was standard diglycidyl ether of bisphenol-A (type E-44), and polyamide resin-650 as the matched hardener was used to prepare monolithic epoxy matrix. Both were bought from Jinan Tianmao Resin Chemical Co. Ltd. (Shandong, China).

2.2. Preparation of GO, RGO and TiO2-RGO Nanocomposites

The graphene oxide (GO) which was used to synthesize the titania-graphene (TiO2-RGO) nanocomposites was obtained by the modified hummers method [34], as shown in Figure 1. As formulated in Table 1, the flake graphite was oxidized in a solution of sulfuric acid and sodium nitrate at the temperature of 0 °C, following the slow addition of potassium permanganate. It should be noted that the mixed solution was stirred for complete oxidation with a low speed rate for 12 h. An amount of 90 mL of deionized water was added into the flask for continuous 20 min stirring at an environment temperature of 98 °C. A luminous yellow solution was exhibited when the residual oxidants were removed by hydrogen peroxide solution. The dried GO was obtained at the vacuum oven after repeated washing by the hydrochloric acid solution.
The synthesized GO (0.1 g) was sonicated in the deionized water (100 mL) for 2 h until it became a well dispersed GO solution. The sodium borohydride (NaBH4)-dissolved ethanol solution (1 g NaBH4 in 100 mL ethanol) and the precursor of titanium oxide (10% of GO dosage, i.e., 0.01 g) were alternately added to the GO solution with a continuous magnetic stirring under a 65 °C water bath for 12 h. As a comparison, the same sodium borohydride (NaBH4)-dissolved ethanol solution was used for reduction graphene (RGO) preparation under the same reaction environment. The TiO2-RGO nanocomposites and RGO particles were respectively collected after sequential filtering, washing, drying and grinding.

2.3. Fabrication of TiO2-RGO-EP Composites

The schematic diagram for the preparation of titania-graphene-epoxy composites (TiO2-RGO-EP) is shown in Figure 2. It was of critical importance to obtain a homogenous epoxy with TiO2-RGO nanocomposites. A complex solvent with a xylene-to-N-butanol weight ratio of 7:3 was used to disperse the TiO2-RGO nanocomposites and E-44 epoxy, respectively. The TiO2-RGO solution was then mixed with the epoxy solution that was preheated at 80 °C for 2 h. Afterwards, the hardener was homogenized in TiO2-RGO-EP solution with a weight ratio of 1:1 to fabricate the TiO2-RGO-EP composites. The final mixture was cast into the molds for 1 h degassing and 3 h thermal curing in an oven (65 °C). The hardened monolithic epoxy matrices were demolded for tensile testing and microanalysis. The detailed experimental program flow is displayed in Figure 3.
The schematic diagram for the preparation of titania-graphene-epoxy composites (TiO2-RGO-EP) is shown in the Figure 2. It was of critical importance to obtain a homogenous epoxy with TiO2-RGO nanocomposites. A complex solvent with a xylene-to-N-butanol weight ratio of 7:3 was used to disperse the TiO2-RGO nanocomposites and E-44 epoxy, respectively. The TiO2-RGO solution was then mixed with the epoxy solution that was preheated at 80 °C for 2 h. Afterwards, the hardener was homogenized in TiO2-RGO-EP solution with a weight ratio of 1:1 to fabricate the TiO2-RGO-EP composites. The final mixture was cast into the molds for 1 h degassing and 3 h thermal curing in oven (65 °C). The hardened monolithic epoxy matrices were demolded for tensile testing and microanalysis. The detailed experimental program flow is displayed in Figure 3.

2.4. Material Characterization & Performance Assessment

The morphologies and disperse states of TiO2-RGO solution and TiO2-RGO-EP solution (xylene and N-butanol as solvent, as shown in Figure 3) were characterized by the transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Fourier transform infrared (FTIR, Thermo Fisher Scientific Nicolet) and Raman (Renishaw inVia 71J012) spectroscopies were conducted to investigate the molecular structures of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites and TiO2-RGO-EP composites. For the FTIR measurement, the samples were ground together with the KBr powder, and the mixed powder was pressed into a transparent sheet for test. FTIR spectroscopy results were collected by absorption mode from 4000 to 400 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1.
The tensile strength of TiO2-RGO-EP composite matrices were tested by a computer controlled universal material testing machine (MZ-4000D) with a speed rate of 2 mm/min. The shape and dimension of samples for tensile test is designed according to GB/T2567-2008, as shown in Figure 4. The tensile strength and elongation of samples were calculated following Equations (1) and (2), respectively. The maximum tensile strength and elongation at break were both obtained during the test.
The microstructures of TiO2-RGO-EP composite matrices with different dosages of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites were analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, ZEISS MERLIN) to explore the influences of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites on final epoxy products. Before the microscopic measurement, the typical samples were desiccated (60 °C for 24 h) and surface coated with gold sputter.
S t r e n g t h = F o r c e max S e c t i o n a l a r e a
E l o n g a t i o n = Δ L L × 100 %

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Morphological Features of RGO, TiO2-RGO and TiO2-RGO-EP

As shown in Figure 4, the macro- and micro-morphological features and disperse states of RGO, TiO2-RGO and TiO2-RGO-EP are compared. Figure 5a shows the distribution change in RGO and TiO2-RGO in the aqueous solution along with the standing time (0, 10 and 20 min). In the beginning, both solutions behave highly dispersed under supersonic vibration. The remarkable sinking was observed in the RGO solution after 10 min standing, following a total separation with dual zones (i.e., RGO and water) in 30 min. In contrast, the TiO2-RGO solution remain unchanged during the same period, which meant the introduction of TiO2 nanoparticles enabled a well disperse state of RGO solution. It is presumed that the graphene sheets are well embedded between TiO2 nanoparticles to prevent the great van der Waals forces of RGO particles. The structure directing features of the incorporated layered graphene component may cause the TiO2 nanoparticles with marginal usage in TiO2-RGO nanocomposites (i.e., 10% of GO dosage) to be perceived. Figure 5b shows the TEM image of the highly dispersed graphene. It can be seen that the highly disperse graphene is so thin that it looks similar to a cicada’s wing. The translucent two-dimensional tiled state graphene sheets are stacked on each other with a pleated appearance. Figure 5c shows the nano-morphologies of TiO2-RGO-EP composites. The diluted epoxy microscopically presents a spherical shape, as marked in Figure 5c. It can also be seen that TiO2-RGO nanoparticles as the “nanofillers” were combined with the epoxy that changed the distribution pattern of epoxy. The RGO no longer existed in a flat form, and the epoxy complexed RGO underwent a certain degree of twisting, folding and bending, as shown in TEM image.

3.2. FT-IR and Raman Analysis of TiO2-RGO Nanoparticles

Structural characterization of the TiO2 and TiO2-RGO nanoparticles were explained by FTIR and Raman spectroscopy. As indicated in Figure 6a, the TiO2 well exhibited the characteristic absorption peaks at 3420, 1563 and 1451 cm−1 and continuous peaks from 800 to 500 cm−1, which correspond to the absorption peaks of TiO2. Moreover, the intensity of the defined absorption peaks of 3420 cm−1 on TiO2-RGO nanoparticles are a little weaker than those of TiO2, and the intensity of the peak at 700 cm−1 and 400 cm−1 obviously increased. The above changes in absorption peak intensity can be attributed to the synthesis of Ti-O bonds and T-C bonds [35]. Additionally, the transformations of intensity and position of defined peaks indicates chemical bonding has been formed between TiO2 and RGO.
The Raman spectra of the TiO2-RGO samples has been shown in Figure 6. The characteristic band of carbon material is the D band, used to characterize the structural defects or edges in graphene samples, which always shows up at about 1350 cm−1, and the G band, which always shows up at about 1580 cm−1, represents the in-plane vibration of sp2 carbon atoms [2,36]. It can be seen from the Figure 6b that the D band of the TiO2/RGO is shown at 1339 cm−1, and G band of the same is 1602 cm−1. Besides the D band and G band, the nanocomposites also have four peaks appearing at 146, 389, 514 and 636 cm−1, which are characteristic of the e.g., B1g(1), A1g and B1g(2), and Eg(2) modes of anatase TiO2, respectively [37]. Combined with the results of the FT-IR, it is known that titanium dioxide is successfully intercalated between the layers of graphene sheets.
In order to identify the combination between TiO2-RGO and EP, the Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopies were utilized to study the functional groups and molecular skeleton of TiO2-RGO-EP composites. FTIR of the pure EP and TiO2-RGO nanocomposites-modified EP (0.10% addition) is shown in Figure 7a. The spectrum of the resulting TiO2-RGO-EP composites showed C-H stretching vibration at 3055 cm−1 from the benzene ring in the skeleton of EP. The EP also shows absorption peaks at 2965, 2927 and 1456 cm−1, indicating the asymmetric shrinkage peak of the methyl group, asymmetric contraction peak of the methylene group and asymmetrical bending of methyl. The C-C stretching vibration is located at 1607, 1581 and 1509 cm−1. There are also C-(CH3)3 skeleton vibration, C-H2 rocking vibration, C-H swing vibration of C-H and in-plane deformation of (CH2)3 occurring at 1246, 915, 815, 772 and 736 cm−1, respectively. In addition to the skeleton structure, the characteristic peak of EP was detected at 1036 cm−1, which indicated the C-O-C vibration [3]. In conclusion, the marginal change in peaks of FTIR of TiO2-RGO-EP composites was identified compared to the pure EP, which meant that no chemical bonding was produced due to the addition of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites.
Raman spectra of the TiO2-RGO-EP composites with different percentages of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites are shown in Figure 7b, where the Raman spectrum of the prepared TiO2-RGO nanocomposites is inserted as a reference. Different from the unmodified EP sample, the Raman spectra of epoxy resin samples with the TiO2-RGO nanocomposites all exhibit two characteristic bands caused by these nanomaterials. It was found that the frequency of the G band shifted from 1602 to 1581 cm−1. At the same time, the frequency of D band shifted from 1339 to 1346 cm−1. The appearance of the D and G bands both resulted from the doping of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites.

3.3. Mechanical and Morphological Properties of TiO2-RGO-EP Composites

Tensile strength and elongation are two intuitive indicators that confirm the effect of the TiO2-RGO nanocomposites on the mechanical improvement of the epoxy matrix. The test results of the TiO2-RGO-EP composites varying with the dosage of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites are shown in Figure 8. As shown in Figure 8a, the tensile strength of the TiO2-RGO-EP composites achieved the maximum increase (75.54% increase compared to the control one and reaching 36.09 MPa) in case of 0.10% TiO2-RGO nanocomposites. Other groups with the dosages of such nanocomposites (i.e., 0.03%, 0.05% and 0.20%) could obtain increases in tensile strength to 27.62, 32.03, and 32.09 MPa, respectively, compared to the epoxy without additives (20.56 MPa). When the content of graphene in epoxy exceeded the optimum dosage (i.e., 0.10% TiO2-RGO nanocomposites), the tensile strength of the final products decreased, which meant that the superfluous graphene would compromise the performance of monolithic epoxy.
The elongation at break indicates the toughness of the epoxy resin. The elongation of the TiO2-RGO-EP composites varying with the dosage of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites is shown in Figure 8b. The control epoxy (i.e., without any TiO2-RGO nanocomposite) has a 1.24% elongation at break. The elongation of the TiO2-RGO-EP composites improve significantly with the increase in TiO2-RGO nanocomposites. The maximum elongation at break was achieved when the dosage of nanocomposites was 0.2%, reaching 3.43%, which was 176.6% higher than that of the control epoxy. The elongation of the TiO2-RGO-EP composites with 0.03% and 0.05% RGO did not show impressive increase (only 12.9% and 29.0%, respectively).
SEM images of the TiO2-RGO-EP composites with different dosages of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites are displayed in Figure 9. It was clearly found that the morphologies of break section of epoxy resin samples were greatly changed with the addition of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites. In the control epoxy, the break section had a regular texture and was smooth at high magnification without excess protrusion and wrinkles. After amplification, micro cracks can be seen in the tensile section. On the contrary, the graphene-modified epoxy exhibited an irregular texture and a rough section at the break sections, regardless of graphene dosage.
The seeding of anatase TiO2 nanoparticles into RGO produced the TiO2-RGO nanocomposites with highly improved dispersion of RGO. Such chemical synthesis enabled the anatase TiO2 to insert the interlayers of the RGO. The dispersion of nano-sized TiO2-RGO materials in the epoxy bridged the cracks generated during the epoxy curing, which may lead to the change in the transmission path of the epoxy sample under the concentrated load. The strengthening mechanism of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites on the tensile test of epoxy is shown in Figure 10. The TiO2-RGO nanocomposites can tradeoff the tensile effect in the tensile samples. The stretched sections with rough and uneven surface are left behind due to the pull-out RGO nanoparticles [38]. Thus, a significant increase in the tensile properties of the graphene-modified epoxy with optimal dosage resulted.

4. Conclusions

This paper reported the synthesis of a kind of highly dispersed graphene by using a novel “in-situ titania intercalation” method, which enabled inserting the nano titania between the layer of graphene to overcome the interfacial van der Waals force of graphene. These features were confirmed by the FTIR and Raman spectroscopies. Such highly disperse titania-graphene nanocomposites were further used to modify epoxy resin by a simple method. Compared to the unmodified epoxy, the optimal tensile strength and elongation of the TiO2-RGO-EP composites can increase by 75.54% and 121.77% in case of a 0.10% addition of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites. Additionally, the elongation of the epoxy could reach 176.61% when 0.20% TiO2-RGO nanocomposites were used. The surprising result can solve the main drawbacks of epoxy resin (such as the poor expanding and flexural properties). This highly dispersed titania-graphene nanocomposites could be expected to be applicable in many other fields due to their merits, as they have a low cost, simple procedure and good mechanical property.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Y.W. and S.G.; methodology, Y.W.; formal analysis, S.G.; writing—original draft preparation, Y.W.; writing—review and editing, B.D. and F.X.; supervision, F.X.; funding acquisition, S.G. and F.X. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978354). The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Durability for Marine Civil Engineering (No. 2020B1212060074) and from Guangdong Provincial Education Department Project (No. 2018KZDXM060).

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51978354), Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Durability for Marine Civil Engineering (No. 2020B1212060074), and Guangdong Provincial Education Department Project (No. 2018KZDXM060).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Bai, H.; Li, C.; Shi, G. Functional composite materials based on chemically converted graphene. Adv. Mater. 2011, 23, 1089–1115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Geim, A.K.; Novoselov, K.S. The rise of graphene. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Geim, A.K. Graphene: Status and Prospects. Science 2009, 324, 1530–1534. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Cai, W.; Zhu, Y.; Li, X.; Piner, R.D.; Ruoff, R.S. Large area few-layer graphene/graphite films as transparent thin conducting electrodes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 95, 125432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhu, Y.; Murali, S.; Cai, W.; Li, X.; Suk, J.W.; Potts, J.R.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene and graphene oxide: Synthesis, properties, and applications. Adv. Mater. 2010, 22, 3906–3924. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Robinson, J.T.; Perkins, F.K.; Snow, E.S.; Wei, Z.; Sheehan, P. Reduced Graphene Oxide Molecular Sensors. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 3137–3140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Wang, D.; Choi, D.; Li, J.; Yang, Z.; Nie, Z.; Kou, R.; Hu, D.; Wang, C.; Saraf, L.V.; Zhang, J.; et al. Self-Assembled TiO2–Graphene Hybrid Nanostructures for Enhanced Li-Ion Insertion. ACS Nano 2009, 3, 907–914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  8. Zacharia, R.; Ulbricht, H.; Hertel, T. Interlayer cohesive energy of graphite from thermal desorption of polyaromatic hydrocarbons. Phys. Rev. B 2004, 69, 155406-1–155406-7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Huang, G.; Chen, T.; Chen, W.; Wang, Z.; Chang, K.; Ma, L.; Huang, F.; Chen, D.; Lee, J.Y. Graphene-like MoS(2)/graphene composites: Cationic surfactant-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and electrochemical reversible storage of lithium. Small 2013, 9, 3693–3703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lotya, M.; King, P.J.; Khan, U.; De, S.; Coleman, J. High-Concentration, Surfactant-Stabilized Graphene Dispersions. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 3155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Stankovich, S.; Piner, R.D.; Chen, X.; Wu, N.; Nguyen, S.T.; Ruoff, R.S. Stable aqueous dispersions of graphitic nanoplatelets via the reduction of exfoliated graphite oxide in the presence of poly(sodium 4-styrenesulfonate). J. Mater. Chem. 2006, 16, 155–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Liang, Y.; Wu, D.; Feng, X.; Müllen, K. Dispersion of Graphene Sheets in Organic Solvent Supported by Ionic Interactions. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 1679–1683. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Cohn, A.P.; Share, K.; Carter, R.; Oakes, L.; Pint, C.L. Ultrafast Solvent-Assisted Sodium Ion Intercalation into Highly Crystalline Few-Layered Graphene. Nano Lett. 2016, 16, 543–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Si, Y.; Samulski, E.T. Synthesis of water soluble graphene. Nano Lett. 2008, 8, 1679–1682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Shahzadi, K.; Zhang, X.; Mohsin, I.; Ge, X.; Jiang, Y.; Peng, H.; Liu, H.; Li, H.; Mu, X. Reduced Graphene Oxide/Alumina, A Good Accelerant for Cellulose-Based Artificial Nacre with Excellent Mechanical, Barrier, and Conductive Properties. ACS Nano 2017, 11, 5717–5725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, W.-W.; Xia, B.-Y.; Wang, X.-X.; Wang, J.-N. Exfoliation and dispersion of graphene in ethanol-water mixtures. Front. Mater. Sci. 2012, 6, 176–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Hernandez, Y.; Nicolosi, V.; Lotya, M.; Blighe, F.M.; Sun, Z.; De, S.; McGovern, I.T.; Holland, B.; Byrne, M.; Gun’Ko, Y.; et al. High-yield production of graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation of graphite. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2008, 3, 563–568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  18. Hackman, I.; Hollaway, L. Epoxy-layered silicate nanocomposites in civil engineering. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2006, 37, 1161–1170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Monteverde, F.; Scatteia, L. Resistance to Thermal Shock and to Oxidation of Metal Diborides–SiC Ceramics for Aerospace Application. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2007, 90, 1130–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Suh, S.W.; Kim, J.J.; Kim, S.H.; Park, B.K. Effect of PI film surface on printing of Pd(II) catalytic ink for electroless copper plating in the printed electronics. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2012, 18, 290–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, J.K.; Young, W. The mechanical, hygral, and interfacial strength of continuous bamboo fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 166, 272–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kalali, E.N.; Hu, Y.; Wang, X.; Song, L.; Xing, W. Highly-aligned cellulose fibers reinforced epoxy composites derived from bulk natural bamboo. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 129, 434–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Mohan, T.P.; Kanny, K. Compressive characteristics of unmodified and nanoclay treated banana fiber reinforced epoxy composite cylinders. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 169, 118–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ansari, F.; Sjöstedt, A.; Larsson, P.T.; Berglund, L.A.; Wågberg, L. Hierarchical wood cellulose fiber/epoxy biocomposites: Materials design of fiber porosity and nanostructure. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 74, 60–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Capela, C.; Oliveira, S.E.; Ferreira, J.A.M. Fatigue behavior of short carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 164, 191–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guo, J.; Wang, Z.; Tong, L.; Lv, H.; Liang, W. Shape memory and thermo-mechanical properties of shape memory polymer/carbon fiber composites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2015, 76, 162–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xiao, C.; Tan, Y.; Wang, X.; Gao, L.; Wang, L.; Qi, Z. Study on interfacial and mechanical improvement of carbon fiber/epoxy composites by depositing multi-walled carbon nanotubes on fibers. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2018, 703, 8–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sangermano, M.; D’Anna, A.; Marro, C.; Klikovits, N.; Liska, R. UV-activated frontal polymerization of glass fibre reinforced epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2018, 143, 168–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Rajaei, M.; Kim, N.; Bickerton, S.; Bhattacharyya, D. A comparative study on effects of natural and synthesised nano-clays on the fire and mechanical properties of epoxy composites. Compos. Part B Eng. 2019, 165, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Gu, H.; Zhang, H.; Ma, C.; Xu, X.; Wang, Y.; Wang, Z.; Wei, R.; Liu, H.; Liu, C.; Shao, Q.; et al. Trace electrosprayed nanopolystyrene facilitated dispersion of multiwalled carbon nanotubes: Simultaneously strengthening and toughening epoxy. Carbon 2019, 142, 131–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Zhao, R.G.; Luo, W. Fracture surface analysis on nano-Si2/epoxy composite. Mater. Sci. Eng. A Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. 2008, 483, 313–315. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Ma, J.; Meng, Q.; Zaman, I.; Zhu, S.; Michelmore, A.; Kawashima, N.; Wang, C.-H.; Kuan, H. Development of polymer composites using modified, high-structural integrity graphene platelets. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2014, 91, 82–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Atif, R.; Shyha, I.; Inam, F. Mechanical, Thermal, and Electrical Properties of Graphene-Epoxy Nanocomposites—A Review. Polymers 2016, 8, 281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hummers, W.S., Jr.; Offeman, R.E. Preparation of Graphitic Oxide. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1958, 80, 1339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Kusiak-Nejman, E.; Wanag, A.; Kowalczyk, Ł.; Kapica-Kozar, J.; Colbeau-Justin, C.; Medrano MG, M.; Morawski, A.W. Graphene oxide-TiO2 and reduced graphene oxide-TiO2 nanocomposites: Insight in charge-carrier lifetime measurements. Catal. Today 2016, 287, 189–195. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Stankovich, S.; Dikin, D.A.; Dommett, G.H.B.; Kohlhaas, K.M.; Zimney, E.J.; Stach, E.A.; Piner, R.D.; Nguyen, S.; Ruoff, R.S. Graphene-based composite materials. Nature 2006, 442, 282–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bai, X.; Zhang, X.; Hua, Z.; Ma, W.; Dai, Z.; Huang, X.; Gu, H. Uniformly distributed anatase TiO2 nanoparticles on graphene: Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic application. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 599, 10–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Prolongo, S.; Moriche, R.; Jiménez-Suárez, A.; Sanchez, M.; Ureña, A. Advantages and disadvantages of the addition of graphene nanoplatelets to epoxy resins. Eur. Polym. J. 2014, 61, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Jcs 05 00191 g001 550
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for the synthesis process of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram for the synthesis process of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites.
Jcs 05 00191 g001
Jcs 05 00191 g002 550
Figure 2. Schematic diagram for the preparation of TiO2-RGO-EP composites.
Figure 2. Schematic diagram for the preparation of TiO2-RGO-EP composites.
Jcs 05 00191 g002
Jcs 05 00191 g003 550
Figure 3. Experimental program flow.
Figure 3. Experimental program flow.
Jcs 05 00191 g003
Jcs 05 00191 g004 550
Figure 4. The shape and dimension of samples for tensile test.
Figure 4. The shape and dimension of samples for tensile test.
Jcs 05 00191 g004
Jcs 05 00191 g005 550
Figure 5. The macro- and micro-morphologies and disperse states of RGO, TiO2-RGO and TiO2-RGO-EP. (a) Macroscopic observation of disperse state; (b) TEM image TiO2-RGO nanoparticles; (c) TEM image of TiO2-RGO-EP composites.
Figure 5. The macro- and micro-morphologies and disperse states of RGO, TiO2-RGO and TiO2-RGO-EP. (a) Macroscopic observation of disperse state; (b) TEM image TiO2-RGO nanoparticles; (c) TEM image of TiO2-RGO-EP composites.
Jcs 05 00191 g005
Jcs 05 00191 g006 550
Figure 6. FTIR (a) and Raman spectra (b) of the TiO2-RGO nanoparticles.
Figure 6. FTIR (a) and Raman spectra (b) of the TiO2-RGO nanoparticles.
Jcs 05 00191 g006
Jcs 05 00191 g007 550
Figure 7. FTIR (a) and Raman spectra (b) of unmodified EP and TiO2-RGO-EP composites.
Figure 7. FTIR (a) and Raman spectra (b) of unmodified EP and TiO2-RGO-EP composites.
Jcs 05 00191 g007
Jcs 05 00191 g008 550
Figure 8. Tensile strength (a) and elongation at break (b) of TiO2-RGO-EP composites.
Figure 8. Tensile strength (a) and elongation at break (b) of TiO2-RGO-EP composites.
Jcs 05 00191 g008
Jcs 05 00191 g009 550
Figure 9. SEM images of the break section of TiO2-RGO-EP composites with different dosage of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites. (a) 0%, (b) 0.03%, (c) 0.10%.
Figure 9. SEM images of the break section of TiO2-RGO-EP composites with different dosage of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites. (a) 0%, (b) 0.03%, (c) 0.10%.
Jcs 05 00191 g009
Jcs 05 00191 g010 550
Figure 10. Strengthening mechanism of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites on the tensile test of EP.
Figure 10. Strengthening mechanism of TiO2-RGO nanocomposites on the tensile test of EP.
Jcs 05 00191 g010
Table
Table 1. Mixture proportion for the modified Hummers method.
Table 1. Mixture proportion for the modified Hummers method.
Raw MaterialFlake GraphiteNaNO3H2SO4KMnO4
dosage2.0 g1.5 g67.5 mL9.0 g
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Guo, S.; Dong, B.; Xing, F. Enhanced Tensile Strength of Monolithic Epoxy with Highly Dispersed TiO2-Graphene Nanocomposites. J. Compos. Sci. 2021, 5, 191. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcs5070191

AMA Style

Wang Y, Guo S, Dong B, Xing F. Enhanced Tensile Strength of Monolithic Epoxy with Highly Dispersed TiO2-Graphene Nanocomposites. Journal of Composites Science. 2021; 5(7):191. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcs5070191

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yanshuai, Siyao Guo, Biqin Dong, and Feng Xing. 2021. "Enhanced Tensile Strength of Monolithic Epoxy with Highly Dispersed TiO2-Graphene Nanocomposites" Journal of Composites Science 5, no. 7: 191. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcs5070191

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop