Next Article in Journal
DMETTM Genotyping: Tools for Biomarkers Discovery in the Era of Precision Medicine
Next Article in Special Issue
Microbiota and Human Reproduction: The Case of Male Infertility
Previous Article in Journal
Factors Influencing Epigenetic Mechanisms: Is There A Role for Bariatric Surgery?
 
 
Please note that, as of 21 September 2020, High-Throughput has been renamed to BioTech and is now published here.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Colonization Resistance in the Infant Gut: The Role of B. infantis in Reducing pH and Preventing Pathogen Growth

Evolve BioSystems, Inc., Davis, CA 95618, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 28 February 2020 / Revised: 20 March 2020 / Accepted: 25 March 2020 / Published: 27 March 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Human Microbiome and Diseases: Implications for Novel Therapies)

Abstract

:
Over the past century, there has been a steady increase in the stool pH of infants from industrialized countries. Analysis of historical data revealed a strong association between abundance of Bifidobacterium in the gut microbiome of breasted infants and stool pH, suggesting that this taxon plays a key role in determining the pH in the gut. Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis is uniquely equipped to metabolize human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) from breastmilk into acidic end products, mainly lactate and acetate. The presence of these acidic compounds in the infant gut is linked to a lower stool pH. Conversely, infants lacking B. infantis have a significantly higher stool pH, carry a higher abundance of potential pathogens and mucus-eroding bacteria in their gut microbiomes, and have signs of chronic enteric inflammation. This suggests the presence of B. infantis and low intestinal pH may be critical to maintaining a protective environment in the infant gut. Here, we summarize recent studies demonstrating that feeding B. infantis EVC001 to breastfed infants results in significantly lower fecal pH compared to controls and propose that low pH is one critical factor in preventing the invasion and overgrowth of harmful bacteria in the infant gut, a process known as colonization resistance.

1. Introduction

The healthy breastfed infant gut microbiome in the early 1900’s was reported to be dominated by a group of Gram-positive bacteria that today are recognized as Bifidobacterium. Particularly, in 1913, the stool of healthy newborn breastfed infants was described and documented as “films of almost pure culture”. Conversely, Bifidobacterium in the stool of infants fed cow’s milk were much lower in abundance and the stool was instead dominated by Gram-negative bacteria [1]. By 1926, the pH of the healthy newborn breastfed infant stool in the US was reported to have a mean of 4.88, but in infants who were not fed breast milk the stool pH was closer to 6.0 [2]. More than 20 years later, in 1955, the pH of breastfed infant stool was found to be between 5.3 and 5.5 [3]. Today, reports indicate the typical stool pH of infants, regardless of feeding type, to be as high as 6.5, corresponding to an increase of almost two log units from 1926 [4]. Together these records indicate the stool pH of infants has increased substantially during the last century, a period that corresponds with decreased rates of breastfeeding and a reduction in the abundance of Bifidobacterium [4]. It is worth noting that despite significant technological advancements during the past century, the analytical methods used to measure pH have remained largely unchanged, thus allowing direct comparisons of historical and contemporary reports.
Interestingly, changes in infant stool pH appeared to have occurred predominantly in industrialized regions such as the United States and Europe [5]. Conversely, in less-industrialized nations, where breastfeeding rates remain high and microbiome-modifying interventions are less common (e.g., limited exposure to antibiotics and c-section births), Bifidobacterium dominates the microbiome of infants [6,7]. Most notably, in these nations the dominant Bifidobacterium species is B. longum subsp. infantis (B. infantis), which is conspicuously absent in industrialized nations [8,9,10]. In the United States, the microbiome of babies born today are not dominated by Bifidobacterium, and most notably is the lack of B. infantis, specifically [11,12]. Consequently, important ecosystem services of the microbiome are lost, which in turn leads to low community stability and diminished colonization resistance, which together are signatures of infant gut dysbiosis [13]. This species-specific loss of B. infantis from industrialized regions has been posed to be, in part, a consequence of its elimination from the mother’s gut microbiome through repeated use of antibiotics and other interventions known to have decimating collateral effects on the microbiome [14]. Thus, if the mother no longer carries B. infantis in her gut, there is no opportunity of transfer to the baby during the birthing process, which is the main path by which the newborns acquire their gut microbiome [15,16]. Overall, data points to a generational loss of B. infantis over the past century, a period that has also seen a significant rise in autoimmune and allergic diseases [17,18]

2. Lowering pH is a Biological Strategy to Limit Bacterial Growth

The pH of a microbial ecosystem is heavily defined by the metabolites produced by the inhabitants of that ecosystem. Most opportunistic bacterial pathogens prefer to grow at pH approaching neutrality (pH = 6.0–7.0) and grow poorly in acidic conditions (pH ≤ 5.5). Lactic acid bacteria (e.g., Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus) produce acetic and lactic acids as major metabolic end products, which in turn significantly lowers the luminal pH [19]. Lactic acid bacteria have been used in preservation of certain foods for millennia [20], as it prevents the growth of spoilage and pathogenic organisms. This same biological control system is also at work in our bodies. For example, the vaginal mucosa of reproductive-age women is generally dominated by lactic-acid producing bacteria such as Lactobacillus spp. [21] and the healthy vaginal environment is distinctly acidic, with a pH of 4.5–5.5 [22]. A change to an elevated pH is often associated with bacterial vaginosis and the overgrowth of opportunistic pathogenic fungi [21,23]. Although additional hormonal and physiological factors are involved in protecting the vaginal environment, the pH has an important role in protecting the vagina from pathogens [24]. This natural prevention of pathogen invasion, through lowering the pH and exemplified by acidification of the vaginal environment, is one important strategy by which bacterial communities that inhabit the gut protects the host from invading pathogens and is a process known as colonization resistance [25,26].

3. Newborns in the US May Have Reduced Pathogen Colonization Resistance

One of the most important roles of the gut microbiome is to provide colonization resistance from invading intestinal pathogens throughout life [26]. However, this protective role becomes especially important during the neonatal period when the immune system is immature [13,27]. The gut microbiome of the infants born in industrialized nations today is not dominated by Bifidobacterium and is missing B. infantis. Therefore, colonization resistance provided by acidification of the lumen through the production of lactate and acetate has been lost, or at least reduced [10,11,12,28]. The microbiomes of infants born today in most industrialized nations present signatures of low community stability and carry a high abundance of potential pathogens in the first months of life [29,30]. In clinical trials where B. infantis EVC001 was fed to breastfed infants, the mean fecal pH was reduced to 5.15 ± SD 0.42, the gut microbiome was dominated by Bifidobacterium, and the populations of opportunistic pathogens were significantly reduced [11,31].
The mechanism by which B. infantis becomes dominant in the gut and reduces pH is by its unique ability to metabolize all human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) into acidic end products, mainly lactate and acetate. HMO make up to 15% of the energy content of human milk and over 200 distinct complex HMO structures have been identified. HMO in human milk cannot be metabolized by the infant or by the vast majority of bacteria that inhabit the infant gut which lack the required enzymes necessary to access and metabolize these complex glycan molecules [32]. However, B. infantis is the only known organism capable of consuming all HMO structures in mother’s milk due to its unique genetic architecture. Specifically, B. infantis contains clusters of unique genes that encode for proteins required for the capture, uptake, deconstruction and metabolism of the HMO in human milk [33]. Consequently, we and others [34] posit that human milk is a selective growth medium for B. infantis, the engraftment of which, establishes colonization resistance in the infant gut by lowering the pH [13].
In the absence of B. infantis, the HMO are almost completely eliminated in the stool as humans lack the enzymes required to metabolize them [11,35]. Consequently, if the infant gut microbiome is not producing high levels of acetate and lactate, the colonic pH remains high and it no longer provides colonization resistance to gut of the infant [11,13]. Cohort studies indicate the lack of colonization resistance and subsequent higher pH in the gut of the breastfed infants results in increased levels of potentially virulent pathogens [31], an increased antibiotic resistant gene load [12], and chronic enteric inflammation within the first 100 days of life [36], which has a strong association with increased prevalence of autoimmune disorders [37,38] (Figure 1).

4. Reestablishing B. infantis Restores Colonization Resistance to the Infant Gut

A controlled clinical intervention trial showed that when B. infantis EVC001 was fed to exclusively breastfed babies, their stool pH and stooling patterns returned to the condition reported in 1900’s (i.e., stool pH of 5.1 and 2–3 soft stools per day) compared to the control infants who produced 5–7 watery stools per day with a stool pH of 6.1 [5]. The control infants, which were all exclusively breastfed and mostly vaginally delivered, were missing B. infantis and presented a marked dysbiosis signature and high levels of potentially pathogenic bacteria [11].
Furthermore, 100% of the infants fed B. infantis EVC001 established a highly stable gut microbiome dominated by B. infantis (up to 90% relative abundance) [11,12]. Interestingly, while the dominance of B. infantis EVC001 had a substantial effect on microbiome composition in terms of relative abundance (beta diversity), there were no differences in terms of microbial species richness (alpha diversity). Specifically, we observed a similar Shannon diversity index in both controls and B. infantis EVC001-fed infants. However, the relative abundance of virulent pathogens such as E. coli, Klebsiella, Clostridium and Staphylococcus were all decreased by over 93% [31] and the bacterial antibiotic resistant gene load in the infant gut was also reduced by 90% relative to the control breastfed infants [12]. Further investigation indicated that control infants exhibited strong signals of erosion of the colonic mucous layer that protects the intestinal epithelium [39] and significant enteric inflammation in the first 40–60 days of life [36]. Conversely, infants that were colonized by B. infantis EVC001 had much less evidence of mucous layer erosion and inflammation over the same time period [36,39]. It is worth noting that B. infantis also contributes to maintaining the intestinal barrier integrity through the production of acetate and tryptophan compounds [40,41,42].

5. Low pH Is Key to Colonization Resistance in the Infant Gut

The vaginal microbiome and the infant gut microbiome are two examples of microbial ecosystems which are nominally dominated by lactic acid bacteria, and where the resulting lower pH provides a resistance to invasion by opportunistic pathogens. When these functional microbiomes are disrupted, colonization resistance is subsequently reduced, and the underlying tissues are put at risk [13] (Figure 1). The lack of colonization resistance in the newborn infant may be of particular concern since the first 100 days of life is a critical period for the development of the immune system [27,43]. Seventy percent of the immune system is associated with the gut [44] and in the first months of life patterns associated with the recognition of self and non-self are established with life-long consequences [27,30,43,45].
Intriguingly, along with the loss of colonization resistance in the infant gut over the past 100 years, there has been a dramatic increase of autoimmune disorders (e.g., asthma, atopic dermatitis, food allergies, Type I Diabetes, etc.) across industrialized nations including the United States [45,46]. Although it is tempting to make a causal link in this association, no randomized controlled trials have been undertaken as yet to establish whether the restoration of colonization resistance early in an infant’s life can deflect the development of autoimmune conditions later in life. However, increased biomarkers associated with the development of allergic and autoimmune conditions [37,38] and blunting of vaccine responses [6,8] in infants with microbiomes depleted in Bifidobacterium, suggests a plausible linkage between the reduced colonization resistance and a compromised development of the immune system [47].

6. Conclusions and Outlook

Altogether, data strongly indicate that the absence of B. infantis in the infant gut microbiome, and the associated loss of acetate and lactate production, leads to a stool pH above 5.5. This elevated stool pH decreases colonization resistance and allows the overgrowth of harmful bacterial populations [31,39] which are strongly linked to enteric inflammation [36] and an increased incidence of allergic and autoimmune disorders later in life [45]. When B. infantis EVC001 was reintroduced to the infant gut, fecal pH was reduced to levels that are inhibitory of pathogen growth and the natural colonization resistance to the infant gut was restored [11,13]. Given that aberrant gut microbiome compositions in early life (i.e., dysbiosis) are important determinants of acute and chronic ailments later in life [27,43], restoring B. infantis to the infant gut may be a key step towards improving lifetime health of future generations.
Furthermore, based on historical precedence and the present situation in populations from nations with limited exposure to gut microbiome-damaging practices such as excessive antibiotic use and c-section births, we propose that the reference range for a healthy infant fecal pH should be established between 4.5 and 5.5. Overall, research summarized here indicates that infant fecal pH above 5.5 is accompanied by a loss of colonization resistance as reflected by the increased abundance of potential pathogens, degradation of the gut mucosal barrier, and inflammation [13,36,39]. For this reason, fecal pH at or above this level should be classified as outside of a normal/adequate range. We recognize that some intestinal conditions such as those driven by carbohydrate malabsorption may also decrease the fecal pH [48]. However, due to the relative infrequency of such conditions versus the current high prevalence of dysbiosis-related elevated fecal pH in infants, we submit that the individual medical interest and the public health interest are best served by the proposed change.

Author Contributions

G.C., R.M.D. and D.K. contributed to writing, editing and approving the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

G.C., R.M.D. and D.K. are employed by EvolveBiosystems, Inc.

References

  1. Logan, W.R. The intestinal flora of infants and young children. J. Pathol. Bacteriol. 1913, 18, 527–551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Norton, R.C.; Shohl, A. The hydrogen ion concentration of the stools of new-born infants. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1926, 32, 183–191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Pratt, A.G.; Read, W., Jr. Influence of type of feeding on pH of stool, pH of skin, and incidence of perianal dermatitis in the newborn infant. J. Pediatr. 1955, 46, 539–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Henrick, B.M.; Hutton, A.A.; Palumbo, M.C.; Casaburi, G.; Mitchell, R.D.; Underwood, M.A.; Smilowitz, J.T.; Frese, S.A. Elevated Fecal pH Indicates a Profound Change in the Breastfed Infant Gut Microbiome Due to Reduction of Bifidobacterium over the Past Century. mSphere 2018, 3, e00041-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Smilowitz, J.T.; Moya, J.; Breck, M.A.; Cook, C.; Fineberg, A.; Angkustsiri, K.; Underwood, M.A. Safety and tolerability of Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis EVC001 supplementation in healthy term breastfed infants: A phase I clinical trial. BMC Pediatr. 2017, 17, 133. [Google Scholar]
  6. Huda, M.N.; Ahmad, S.M.; Alam, M.J.; Khanam, A.; Kalanetra, K.M.; Taft, D.H.; Raqib, R.; Underwood, M.A.; Mills, D.A.; Stephensen, C.B. Bifidobacterium Abundance in Early Infancy and Vaccine Response at 2 Years of Age. Pediatrics 2019, 143. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Grzeskowiak, L.; Collado, M.C.; Mangani, C.; Maleta, K.; Laitinen, K.; Ashorn, P.; Isolauri, E.; Salminen, S. Distinct gut microbiota in southeastern African and northern European infants. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2012, 54, 812–816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Huda, M.N.; Lewis, Z.; Kalanetra, K.M.; Rashid, M.; Ahmad, S.M.; Raqib, R.; Qadri, F.; Underwood, M.A.; Mills, D.A.; Stephensen, C.B. Stool microbiota and vaccine responses of infants. Pediatrics 2014, 134, e362–e372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  9. Young, S.L.; Simon, M.A.; Baird, M.A.; Tannock, G.W.; Bibiloni, R.; Spencely, K.; Lane, J.M.; Fitzharris, P.; Crane, J.; Town, I. Bifidobacterial species differentially affect expression of cell surface markers and cytokines of dendritic cells harvested from cord blood. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2004, 11, 686–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Lawley, B.; Otal, A.; Moloney-Geany, K.; Diana, A.; Houghton, L.; Heath, A.M.; Taylor, R.W.; Tannock, G.W. Fecal Microbiotas of Indonesian and New Zealand Children Differ in Complexity and Bifidobacterial Taxa during the First Year of Life. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2019, 85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Frese, S.A.; Hutton, A.A.; Contreras, L.N.; Shaw, C.A.; Palumbo, M.C.; Casaburi, G.; Xu, G.; Davis, J.C.C.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Henrick, B.M.; et al. Persistence of Supplemented Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis EVC001 in Breastfed Infants. mSphere 2017, 2, e00501-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  12. Casaburi, G.; Duar, R.M.; Vance, D.P.; Mitchell, R.; Contreras, L.; Frese, S.A.; Smilowitz, J.T.; Underwood, M.A. Early-life gut microbiome modulation reduces the abundance of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. Antimicrob. Resist. Infect. Control. 2019, 8, 131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Duar, R.M.; Henrick, B.M.; Casaburi, G.; Frese, S.A. Integrating the ecosystem services framework to define dysbiosis of the breastfed infant gut: The role of B. infantis and human milk oligosaccharides. Front. Nutr. 2020, 7, 33. [Google Scholar]
  14. Tannock, G.W.; Lee, P.S.; Wong, K.H.; Lawley, B. Why Don’t All Infants Have Bifidobacteria in Their Stool? Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 834. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Duar, R.M.; Kyle, D.; Tribe, R.M. Reintroducing B.infantis to the Cesarean-born neonate: An ecologically sound alternative to “vaginal seeding”. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 2020, 367, fnaa032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Ferretti, P.; Pasolli, E.; Tett, A.; Asnicar, F.; Gorfer, V.; Fedi, S.; Armanini, F.; Truong, D.T.; Manara, S.; Zolfo, M.; et al. Mother-to-Infant Microbial Transmission from Different Body Sites Shapes the Developing Infant Gut Microbiome. Cell Host Microbe 2018, 24, 133–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Bach, J.F. The effect of infections on susceptibility to autoimmune and allergic diseases. N. Engl. J. Med. 2002, 347, 911–920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lerner, A.; Jeremias, P.; Matthias, T. The world incidence and prevalence of autoimmune diseases is increasing. Int. J. Celiac. Dis. 2015, 3, 151–155. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Stiles, M.E. Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 1996, 70, 331–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Nair, B.M.; Prajapati, J.B. The history of fermented foods. In Handbook of Fermented Functional Foods; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, USA, 2003; pp. 17–42. [Google Scholar]
  21. Petrova, M.I.; Lievens, E.; Malik, S.; Imholz, N.; Lebeer, S. Lactobacillus species as biomarkers and agents that can promote various aspects of vaginal health. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Miller, E.A.; Beasley, D.E.; Dunn, R.R.; Archie, E.A. Lactobacilli dominance and vaginal pH: Why is the human vaginal microbiome unique? Front. Microbiol. 2016, 7, 1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Bradford, L.L.; Ravel, J. The vaginal mycobiome: A contemporary perspective on fungi in women’s health and diseases. Virulence 2017, 8, 342–351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Linhares, I.M.; Summers, P.R.; Larsen, B.; Giraldo, P.C.; Witkin, S.S. Contemporary perspectives on vaginal pH and lactobacilli. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2011, 204, 120.e1–120.e5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Pickard, J.M.; Núñez, G. Pathogen Colonization Resistance in the Gut and Its Manipulation for Improved Health. Am. J. Pathol. 2019, 189, 1300–1310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  26. Lawley, T.D.; Walker, A.W. Intestinal colonization resistance. Immunology 2013, 138, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Olin, A.; Henckel, E.; Chen, Y.; Lakshmikanth, T.; Pou, C.; Mikes, J.; Gustafsson, A.; Bernhardsson, A.K.; Zhang, C.; Bohlin, K.; et al. Stereotypic Immune System Development in Newborn Children. Cell 2018, 174, 1277–1292.e14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  28. Taft, D.H.; Liu, J.; Maldonado-Gomez, M.X.; Akre, S.; Huda, M.N.; Ahmad, S.M.; Stephensen, C.B.; Mills, D.A. Bifidobacterial Dominance of the Gut in Early Life and Acquisition of Antimicrobial Resistance. mSphere 2018, 3, e00441-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Yassour, M.; Vatanen, T.; Siljander, H.; Hämäläinen, A.-M.; Härkönen, T.; Ryhänen, S.J.; Franzosa, E.A.; Vlamakis, H.; Huttenhower, C.; Gevers, D. Natural history of the infant gut microbiome and impact of antibiotic treatment on bacterial strain diversity and stability. Sci. Transl. Med. 2016, 8, 343ra81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Backhed, F.; Roswall, J.; Peng, Y.; Feng, Q.; Jia, H.; Kovatcheva-Datchary, P.; Li, Y.; Xia, Y.; Xie, H.; Zhong, H.; et al. Dynamics and Stabilization of the Human Gut Microbiome during the First Year of Life. Cell Host Microbe 2015, 17, 690–703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Casaburi, G.; Frese, S.A. Colonization of breastfed infants by Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis EVC001 reduces virulence gene abundance. Hum. Microbiome J. 2018, 9, 7–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zivkovic, A.M.; German, J.B.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Mills, D.A. Human milk glycobiome and its impact on the infant gastrointestinal microbiota. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2011, 108, 4653–4658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  33. Sela, D.A.; Chapman, J.; Adeuya, A.; Kim, J.H.; Chen, F.; Whitehead, T.R.; Lapidus, A.; Rokhsar, D.S.; Lebrilla, C.B.; German, J.B.; et al. The genome sequence of Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis reveals adaptations for milk utilization within the infant microbiome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105, 18964–18969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Underwood, M.A.; German, J.B.; Lebrilla, C.B.; Mills, D.A. Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis: Champion colonizer of the infant gut. Pediatr. Res. 2015, 77, 229–235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  35. De Leoz, M.L.; Kalanetra, K.M.; Bokulich, N.A.; Strum, J.S.; Underwood, M.A.; German, J.B.; Mills, D.A.; Lebrilla, C.B. Human milk glycomics and gut microbial genomics in infant feces show a correlation between human milk oligosaccharides and gut microbiota: A proof-of-concept study. J. Proteome Res. 2015, 14, 491–502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  36. Henrick, B.M.; Chew, S.; Casaburi, G.; Brown, H.K.; Frese, S.A.; Zhou, Y.; Underwood, M.A.; Smilowitz, J.T. Colonization by B. infantis EVC001 modulates enteric inflammation in exclusively breastfed infants. Pediatr. Res. 2019, 86, 749–757. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Orivuori, L.; Mustonen, K.; de Goffau, M.; Hakala, S.; Paasela, M.; Roduit, C.; Dalphin, J.C.; Genuneit, J.; Lauener, R.; Riedler, J. High level of fecal calprotectin at age 2 months as a marker of intestinal inflammation predicts atopic dermatitis and asthma by age 6. Clin. Exp. Allergy 2015, 45, 928–939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Vatanen, T.; Kostic, A.D.; d‘Hennezel, E.; Siljander, H.; Franzosa, E.A.; Yassour, M.; Kolde, R.; Vlamakis, H.; Arthur, T.D.; Hamalainen, A.M.; et al. Variation in Microbiome LPS Immunogenicity Contributes to Autoimmunity in Humans. Cell 2016, 165, 842–853. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Karav, S.; Casaburi, G.; Frese, S.A. Reduced colonic mucin degradation in breastfed infants colonized by Bifidobacterium longum subsp. infantis EVC001. FEBS Open Bio 2018, 8, 1649–1657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Ehrlich, A.M.; Henrick, B.; Pacheco, A.; Taft, D.; Xu, G.; Huda, N.; Lozada-Contreras, M.; Goodson, M.; Slupsky, C.; Mills, D. Bifidobacterium grown on human milk oligosaccharides produce tryptophan metabolite Indole-3-lactic acid that significantly decreases inflammation in intestinal cells in vitro. FASEB J. 2018, 32, lb359. [Google Scholar]
  41. Meng, D.; Sommella, E.; Salviati, E.; Campiglia, P.; Ganguli, K.; Djebali, K.; Zhu, W.; Walker, W.A. Indole-3-lactic acid, a metabolite of tryptophan, secreted by Bifidobacterium longum subspecies infantis is anti-inflammatory in the immature intestine. Pediatr. Res. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Fukuda, S.; Toh, H.; Hase, K.; Oshima, K.; Nakanishi, Y.; Yoshimura, K.; Tobe, T.; Clarke, J.M.; Topping, D.L.; Suzuki, T.; et al. Bifidobacteria can protect from enteropathogenic infection through production of acetate. Nature 2011, 469, 543–547. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Arrieta, M.C.; Stiemsma, L.T.; Dimitriu, P.A.; Thorson, L.; Russell, S.; Yurist-Doutsch, S.; Kuzeljevic, B.; Gold, M.J.; Britton, H.M.; Lefebvre, D.L.; et al. Early infancy microbial and metabolic alterations affect risk of childhood asthma. Sci. Transl. Med. 2015, 7, 307ra152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Vighi, G.; Marcucci, F.; Sensi, L.; Di Cara, G.; Frati, F. Allergy and the gastrointestinal system. Clin. Exp. Immunol. 2008, 153, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Lynch, S.V.; Boushey, H.A. The microbiome and development of allergic disease. Curr. Opin. Allergy Clin. Immunol. 2016, 16, 165–171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Eder, W.; Ege, M.J.; von Mutius, E. The asthma epidemic. N. Engl. J. Med. 2006, 355, 2226–2235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Insel, R.; Knip, M. Prospects for primary prevention of type 1 diabetes by restoring a disappearing microbe. Pediatr. Diabetes 2018, 19, 1400–1406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Guandalini, S.; Newland, C.D. Pediatric Malabsorption Syndromes Workup. Available online: https://emedicine.medscape.com/article/931041-workup (accessed on 20 February 2020).
Figure 1. The breastfed infant gut environment resulting from the presence (A) or absence (B) of B. infantis. (A) In the presence of B. infantis, human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) from breastmilk are efficiently metabolized and converted in metabolic acidic end products, mainly acetate and lactate. These compounds lower the intestinal pH providing colonization resistance. (B) In the absence of B. infantis, HMO are not entirely metabolized and are lost in frequent stooling. The intestinal pH remains at high levels that permit pathogen invasion and replication resulting in both acute and long-term negative health outcomes.
Figure 1. The breastfed infant gut environment resulting from the presence (A) or absence (B) of B. infantis. (A) In the presence of B. infantis, human milk oligosaccharides (HMO) from breastmilk are efficiently metabolized and converted in metabolic acidic end products, mainly acetate and lactate. These compounds lower the intestinal pH providing colonization resistance. (B) In the absence of B. infantis, HMO are not entirely metabolized and are lost in frequent stooling. The intestinal pH remains at high levels that permit pathogen invasion and replication resulting in both acute and long-term negative health outcomes.
High throughput 09 00007 g001

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Duar, R.M.; Kyle, D.; Casaburi, G. Colonization Resistance in the Infant Gut: The Role of B. infantis in Reducing pH and Preventing Pathogen Growth. High-Throughput 2020, 9, 7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ht9020007

AMA Style

Duar RM, Kyle D, Casaburi G. Colonization Resistance in the Infant Gut: The Role of B. infantis in Reducing pH and Preventing Pathogen Growth. High-Throughput. 2020; 9(2):7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ht9020007

Chicago/Turabian Style

Duar, Rebbeca M., David Kyle, and Giorgio Casaburi. 2020. "Colonization Resistance in the Infant Gut: The Role of B. infantis in Reducing pH and Preventing Pathogen Growth" High-Throughput 9, no. 2: 7. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ht9020007

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop