Next Article in Journal
Mapping Food Production in Hyper-Arid and Arid Saharan Africa in the Holocene—A View from the Present
Next Article in Special Issue
Pleistocene Mammals from Pampean Region (Argentina). Biostratigraphic, Biogeographic, and Environmental Implications
Previous Article in Journal
The Interplay between Tectonic Activity, Climate and Sea-Level Change in the Suriname River Valley, Tropical South America
Previous Article in Special Issue
Prey Size Decline as a Unifying Ecological Selecting Agent in Pleistocene Human Evolution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Reconsidering the Equids from the Early Pleistocene Fauna of Apollonia 1 (Mygdonia Basin, Greece)

Laboratory of Geology and Palaeontology, Department of Geology, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, GR-54124 Thessaloniki, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 10 February 2021 / Revised: 30 March 2021 / Accepted: 6 April 2021 / Published: 9 April 2021

Abstract

:
The remains of equids are abundant in the Early Pleistocene faunas of Greece. “Apollonia-1” is one of the richest localities from the latest Villafranchian, providing eight skulls, mandibular remains and plenty of postcranial material during several field campaigns. This study focuses mainly on the skulls, mandibular remains and metapodials from the old and new collection described in detail. The specimens are compared with equids from several Greek and European fossiliferous localities dating from the late Villafranchian to the middle Galerian. The systematic position of Equus apolloniensis is also discussed. Based on its basicranial proportions, E. apolloniensis is considered a true Equus. A second species has also been identified recently, here referred to as Equus sp.; it is poorly represented, and it is even larger and more robust than E. apolloniensis based on a single metacarpal and third phalanges. The presence of two equid species in Apollonia 1 validates its Epivillafranchian (=latest Villafranchian) age.

1. Introduction

Since the beginning of the 1980s, little has been known about the Pleistocene faunas of Greece. The most important publications were those referred to the fauna of Megalopolis in the Peloponnese [1,2,3,4,5]. Sporadic articles describing or reporting the presence of some equid remains were also known from northern Greece (e.g., [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13]). During the end of the 1970′s—beginning of the 1980s, new localities have been discovered, especially in northern Greece, and new material has been unearthed (e.g., [14,15,16,17,18,19,20]). In the following years, extensive fieldwork in the new sites provided rich mammal collections. Several articles have been published, studying these faunas, and providing significant paleontological and biochronological data for Greece and Eastern Mediterranean region (e.g., [21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]).
The arrival of Equus in Eurasia through the Beringian land bridge is one of the most significant events at the beginning of the Pleistocene caused by global environmental changes from humid-warm to cool–dry conditions [44,45,46,47,48]. The Equus Datum is calibrated at 2.58 Ma in Europe and 2.55 Ma in China, while it is slightly younger in Sub Saharan Africa, 2.33 Ma. In the Mediterranean region, the Equus Datum is traced in the early Pleistocene (MNQ 16) localities of Montopoli (Italy) and El Rincon-1 (Spain). In Western and Central Europe, the Equus Datum is recognized in the French locality Roca-Neyra, where Equus and Hipparion co-existed [48,49]. The earliest evidence of Equus in Greece is traced in the locality Damatria in Rhodes Island and probably represents the first local appearance of the genus in this region ([50,51,52,53] and ref. therein). Recently, the two genera were also recognized in the locality Sésklo (Thessaly, Central Greece). The fauna from the lower levels of the section, dated to early Villafranchian (MNQ 16 (probably in its upper part), includes Plesiohipparion cf. shanxiense, while in the upper fauna (middle Villafranchian, MNQ 17), Equus stenonis is present [54]. However, the majority of Equus in Greece originates from the middle-late Villafranchian and Epivillafranchian.
Equids are usually the most common fossils in the Pleistocene faunal assemblages of Greece, often representing more than 50% of the palaeocenosis in terms of findings. One of the richest fossil equid collections in Greece comes from the fossiliferous sites of Mygdonia Basin, Northern Greece (Figure 1), framing a time interval from pre-Olduvai to early Middle Pleistocene [20]. Apollonia 1 is a key fossil site in this area as it revealed an extremely well-preserved fossil mammal assemblage of high diversity and abundance. The first collected material of equids from Apollonia 1 was studied earlier, and the new species Equus apolloniensis was erected [41]. The continued field campaigns in the locality provided more material, enriching the old collection. Thus, a revision of the old and the study of the new material is given in this article and provides more information for this taxon and its relationships with the European Pleistocene equids.

2. Geological Setting

The fossiliferous site Apollonia 1 is situated near the village Nea Apollonia, about 45 km northeast of Thessaloniki city within the Neogene–Quaternary deposits of Mygdonia Basin (Figure 1), a tectonic depression formed during the early Middle Miocene [20]. The Neogene/Quaternary deposits of the basin were divided into two main groups, the Premygdonian and the Mygdonian group [56]. Three successive formations have been distinguished in the Premygdonian group: Chrysavgi Fm, Gerakarou Fm and Platanochori Fm [55]. Apollonia 1 is situated within the Platanochori Formation; it mainly consists of sands, sandstones, conglomerates, silty-sands, silts, clays, marls, and marly limestones deposited in fluvial, fluviolacustrine environment [18,55]. Five other localities have been found in the same Formation: Kalamoto-1, Ravin of Voulgarakis, Riza-1, Marathoussa and Platanochori-1. The study of these faunal assemblages suggests an Epivillafranchian (=latest Villafranchian) age [18,31,36]. Apollonia 1 was discovered during the summer of 1991 [20], and after subsequent excavations until 1996, a great number of fossil mammals were unearthed. Another series of the field campaign was developed from 2012 to 2014, which further enriched the collection ([32,57], present study).
The Apollonia fauna was originally correlated with the latest Villafranchian, although the poor collection and limited determinations; the fauna is unique among other known localities from Mygdonia Basin [20]. The enrichment of the collection and its study provided more information for the fauna’s biochronology, which is currently suggested as Epivillafranchian [58,59]. The collection includes more than 1000 specimens. The determination of the Apollonia 1 material allows the recognition of the following taxa: Erinaceus europaeus, Leporidae indet., Lagurodon arankae, Canis etruscus, Canis apolloniensis, Lycaon lycaonoides, Vulpes praeglacialis, Ursus etruscus, Meles dimitrius, Pachycrocuta brevirostris, Homotherium latidens, Lynx issiodorensis, Megantereon cultridens, Mammuthus meridionalis vestinus, Stephanorhinus sp., Equus apolloniensis, Equus sp., “Arvernoceros verestchagini”, Praemegaceros pliotarandoides, Pontoceros ambiguous mediterraneus, Bison cf. degiuli, Soergelia brigittae, Praeovibos mediterraneus, Hemitragus orientalis, cf. Ovis sp. ([24,25,32,38,40,41], pers. obs.). The equids predominate in the fauna, and the studied sample includes remains of the whole skeleton; in the present article, we focus on the cranial and mandibular remains and metapodials.

3. Materials and Methods

The equid sample from Apollonia 1 is quite rich, including several cranial remains (some of them are well preserved) and plenty metapodials. It is stored in the Museum of Geology-Palaeontology-Palaeoanthropology of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (LGPUT). Equid collections from late Villafranchian to middle Galerian, used as comparative material, have been studied in the following museums and institutes: Italy: Museo di Storia Naturale dell’Univerisità degli Studi di Firenze (Montopoli, Upper Valdarno, Olivola, Matassino, Casa Frata, Pirro Nord). France: Claude Bernard University Lyon 1 (Senèze, Saint-Vallier); Musée des Confluences in Lyon (Senèze, Saint-Vallier); University of Bordeaux (Saint-Vallier); Musée de Paléontologie Christian Guth, Chilhac (Chilhac-2, 3); Musée National de Préhistoire, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac-Sireuil (Ceyssaguet). Switzerland: Naturhistorisches Museum Basel (Senèze, Saint-Vallier, Upper Valdarno). Germany: Senckenberg Research Station of Quaternary Palaeontology in Weimar (Süssenborn). Greece: Museum of Geology-Palaeontology-Palaeoanthropology of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Gerakarou 1, Libakos, Dafnero-1,3, Volax, Krimini-1,2,3, Tsiotra Vryssi, Vassiloudi, Platanochori 1); Museum of Palaeontology and Geology of the National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (Sésklo, Alykes, Volos). Data from literature on German equids from Untermassfeld and Mosbach were taken from [60,61,62], on Spanish equids from La Puebla de Valverde from [63] and Venta Micena from [64] and on Italian equids from Selvella-Gioiella from [65].
The discussion on the taxonomy of the slender stenonoid equids from Greece is beyond the scope of this study. Slender equids, from the late Villafranchian Greek localities, Gerakarou 1 and Libakos attributed to E. mygdoniensis and E. altidens, respectively [22,66,67], are similar in size and proportions, and they highly represent the same taxon. However, the material is still under study and will be presented later (Gkeme et al. in prep.). To avoid any confusion, the slender equid from Libakos will be referred to as Equus.
Simpson’s logarithmic ratio diagrams [68] are used to compare the studied material, which is restricted to the most important and abundant skeletal elements, i.e., the cranium and the metapodials. Equus grevyi was used as a reference (measurements taken from [69]). Principal component analysis (PCA) was acquired using PAST 4.05 [70]. Missing values in PCA were treated by applying Iterative Imputation. Statistical differences among metapodials metrics of different species were tested using one-way PERMANOVA in PAST 4.05. Results of this test were considered significant at A95.
Measurements and the dental terminology follow [71,72,73]; upper- and lower-case letters denote upper and lower teeth, respectively. Specimens belonging to juvenile individuals were excluded from this analysis.

4. Systematic Palaeontology

Order Perissodactyla Owen, 1848
Family Equidae Gray, 1821
Genus Equus Linnaeus, 1758
Equus apolloniensis Koufos, Kostopoulos and Sylvestrou, 1997
Holotype: Cranium LGPUT-APL-148, described and figured by [41] (pl. 1, Figure 1 and Figure 2).
Type locality: Apollonia 1, Mygdonia Basin, Macedonia, Greece.
Age: Epivillafranchian (latest Early Pleistocene).
Material: Crania, APL-147, 148, 871, 872; partial crania 518, 519, 605; fragment of occipital bone, APL-813; maxilla with P4-M3 sin and P2-M3 dex, APL-129; fragment of the muzzle with I1-C, APL-268; fragment of the muzzle with I1-I3, APL-314, 574, 646, 812; maxillary fragment with M1, APL-816; tooth row P3-P4 sin, APL-343; P2 dex, APL-138; P3,4 sin, APL-469; M1,2, APL-142, 471, 500, 564; M3, APL-154, 830, 558, 566, 626 874; mandible, APL-570; mandibular fragment with dp2-dp4, m1-m2 dex, APL-572; mandibular fragment with dp2-dp4, m1-m2 sin, APL-870; mandibular fragment with i1-i3, c, p2-m3 sin and dex, APL-785; mandibular fragment with i1-i3, c, p2-m2 sin and i1-3, c, p2-p4 dex, APL-633; mandibular fragment with i1-i3, c, p2-m2 sin and i1-i3, c, p2-m2 dex, APL-792; mandibular fragment with p3-m3 sin, APL-424; mandibular fragment with p2-m3 sin, APL-355; mandibular fragment with p2-m3 dex, APL-606; mandibular fragment with p4-m3 sin APL-295; mandibular fragment with m1-m3 dex, APL-486; mandibular fragment with p3-m2 sin, APL-315; mandibular fragment with p3-m3 dex, APL-557; mandibular fragment with m3 sin, APL-26; mandibular fragment with p2-p3 sin, APL-250, 834; mandibular fragment with p2-p4 dex, APL-622; mandibular fragment, APL-640; tooth row p2-p3 sin, APL-598; tooth row p2-p3 sin, APL-311; tooth row m2-m3 sin, APL-319; tooth row p4-m1 dex, APL-345; p2 sin, APL-562; p2 dex, APL-88 (fragment), 138, 186, 470, 563; p3,4 sin, APL-623; m1/2 sin, APL-119, 137, 185, 609; p3,4 dex, APL-608; m1,2 dex, APL-139, 140, 345, 153, 369, 496; m3 sin, APL-561; m3 dex, APL-301; third metacarpal, APL-74, 156, 165, 261, 306, 390, 445, 502, 612, 635, 742, 776, 777, 778, 787, 788, 793, 861; proximal part of McIII, APL-158, 396, 435, 637, 807, 850, 851; distal part of McIII, APL-164, 636, 851; third metatarsal, APL-76, 89, 91, 92, 130, 237, 293, 328, 329, 347, 449, 575, 610, 611, 621, 634, 789, 790, 794, 846, 848, 879, 880;proximal part of MtIII, APL-C, 81, 130, 167, 156, 160, 161, 162, 232, 248, 324, 362, 476, 517, 739, 805, 854, 859; distal part of MtIII, APL-166, 267, 360, 608, 779, 860, 877.
Measurements: The measurements are given in Tables S2–S4.

4.1. Description

4.1.1. Cranium

APL-148. It is the holotype of the species and was originally described by [41]. The cranium is almost complete, but it is laterally compressed; it belongs to a young adult individual (slightly worn M3); the large canines indicate a male individual (Figure 2). The cranium is elongated, and the muzzle is rather short and wide. The ratio muzzle breadth (meas. 15)/muzzle length (meas. 1)% is 49.2 mm. The palate is wide, but the palatal breadth cannot be measured accurately due to the lateral compression. On the right side, the major palatine foramen is located at the level of the mesial half of M2. The choanae are elongated and elliptical; their anterior border is situated at the level of M1/M2 contact. The medial border of the retroarticular process is almost straight. The narial notch is situated above the P2 mesostyle. The infraorbital foramen is quite large and deep, situated above the P4 parastyle. The anterior border of the facial crest is located above the M1 mesostyle. The facial crest is well-developed. Like all the other Apollonia 1 crania, the facial crest has a wavy shape (Figure 2c). The orbits are large and rounded. The occipital region is partially preserved (possibly due to carnivore attack). The external occipital protuberance is represented by a vertical crest. The foramen magnum is large, less wide and pentagon-shaped. The retroarticular processes are quite large and strong, and they are laterally outreaching the level of the articular surface of the mandibular fossa.
The dentition is completely preserved on both sides (Figure 2a). In lateral view, the cheek teeth are remarkably elongated. Both P1 are absent, but their alveoli are well distinguished. The anterostyle of P2 is elongated but not very wide. The parastyle and mesostyle on P2 and P3 are notched. The protocone is relatively elongated; its lingual border is concave except for P2 and M3 (where it is almost straight). The postprotoconal groove is deep, especially on the premolars. The hypoconal groove is always deep, elongated and pointed. The pli caballin is long and multiple in the premolars; in the molars, it is short and single. The fossettes are moderately plicated at their margins.
APL-871. The cranium is almost complete; it lacks the frontals, nasals, the left zygomatic arch and temporal bones; it is laterally compressed (Figure 3). There are no canines indicating that it is a female individual. In ventral view, the muzzle is rather short, and it is laterally compressed. The palate is not very long but relatively wide. The choanae are large, elliptical-shaped, and their anterior margin is situated at the level of M1/M2 contact. The occipital bone is quite damaged, and the condyles are broken and misplaced. The orbit is relatively short, rounded, and its anterior border is placed above the posterior margin of M3. The infraorbital foramen is large, and it is situated at the level of the parastyle of P4. The facial crest is wavy shaped, well developed; its anterior border is situated caudally above the P4/M1 contact. The zygomatic arch runs almost parallel to the sagittal plane of the cranium.
The cheek teeth rows are parallel. The P1 is present on both sides; it is high, reaching the occlusal level of P2, quite elongated and elliptical-shaped. The anterostyle of P2 is wide and rounded. The protocone is relatively short on all cheek teeth; its lingual border is more or less concave. The fossette margin is moderately plicated.
APL-872. The cranium is mediolaterally compressed and lacks the frontal and nasal bones, the right maxillary sinuses and both orbits; only a part of the left braincase is preserved, and the occiput is completely missing (Figure 4). The occipital bone is quite damaged, and the condyles are broken and misplaced. It belongs to a relatively old individual, possibly female; the Galvayne’ s groove on I3 is at its full length giving an age of ~20 years old. The muzzle is relatively short and wide; the ratio muzzle breadth (meas. 15)/muzzle length (meas. 1)% is 50.4 mm. The palate is relatively short and wide. The major palatine foramens are situated at the anterior half of M3. The choanae are elongated and elliptical; their anterior border is situated approximately at the middle of M2. The left orbit is partially preserved; it is possibly rounded with its anterior border far behind M3. The facial crest is well-developed but does not project laterally as in the other APL crania. The anterior border of the facial crest is placed above the mesostyle of M1; it is wavy shaped.
The P1 is absent. The anterostyle of P2 is rounded and relatively wide. The protocone is relatively long and elliptical on all cheek teeth, except P2; its lingual border is always more or less concave (on P2, it is straight to convex). The second and third premolars are very worn, and most of the enamel in the fossette margin is worn. The enamel plication of the other cheek teeth is simple.
APL-147. The cranium belongs to an old individual (fourth stage of wear), and it was described earlier [41]; it is mediolaterally compressed and lacks the muzzle and the right P2 (Figure 5). The palate is wide, but the mean palatal breadth at the limit between P4 and M1 cannot be measured due to the deformation. The major palatine foramen is located at the posterior half of M2. The choanae are elongated and elliptical, and their anterior border is situated at the M1/M2 contact. The narial notch is situated above the parastyle of P2. The region of the facial crest is crushed; however, the anterior border of the facial crest is located above the P4/M1 contact. The right infraorbital foramen is situated above the posterior half of P4. The orbits are oval-shaped due to the deformation, and their anterior border is far behind the M3. The retroarticular processes are like those of APL-148. The dorsal edge of the zygomatic arch is directed horizontally at a point behind the orbit. The zygomatic process is strong and relatively broad (breadth 28.4 mm). In dorsal view, the nasal bones form a smooth groove along their sagittal suture. The greatest breadth of the cranium is behind the orbits. The frontonasal suture is straight like in E. zebra [74]. The upper part of the occipital bone is missing. The external occipital protuberance is represented by a vertical crest, and there is no depression. The foramen magnum and paracondylar processes resemble those of APL-148. APL-147 preserves the tooth rows P2-M3 dex and P3-M3 sin (Figure 5a). The P2 anterostyle is rounded and relatively short. The hypoconal groove is always shallow and rounded; on the right M3, the hypocone is isolated as an islet. The protocone is relatively long on all teeth, except P2; its lingual margin is almost straight on P2 and M3, while on all the other cheek teeth is concave. The pli caballin is absent. The inner fossettes are simply plicated. The enamel of the buccal side of the fossettes is wrinkled (Figure 5).

4.1.2. Mandible

Among the studied material, there is one almost complete mandible (APL-570), described earlier by [41] and several mandibular fragments, preserving complete tooth rows or part of them. APL-570 is strongly compressed laterally, and only the left condyle and the right coronoid process are missing (Figure 6). It lacks canines, indicating a female individual. The mandibular corpus is high with a relatively short and wide snout. The ratio snout breadth (meas. 7)/snout length (meas. 2)% ranges between 51.8 and 53.2 (mean = 52.6). The vascular notch is clear in APL-570, while in APL-792 is weak. The mental foramen is relatively large and single, situated in the middle of the i3-p2 diastema. In APL-570 and APL-633, there is no acute angle at the junction of the interalveolar border with the border of p2, while in APL-792 and APL-785, they join in a way that the junction forms an angle of almost 90°. In APL-792, possible hypoplasia is observed in M2 (Figure 6c). The p1 is absent in all specimens.

4.1.3. Upper dentition

The cheek teeth are elongated and wide. The length of the upper cheek tooth row ranges from 180.7–201.0 mm (mean = 193.26 mm), and the ratio molar length (meas. 8)/premolar length (7)% is 83.90 on average. The anterostyle of P2 is relatively long and wide. The parastyle and mesostyle are well-developed and wide projecting labially; in APL-148, the mesostyle of the right premolar row is more notched than that in the left one. The fossettes are always isolated except for the slightly worn teeth; the enamel of their borders is moderately plicated. The protocone is relatively elongated; in the worn teeth of APL-147 is remarkably long (especially in M3), while in APL-519, it is short.; the shape of the protocone varies from elongated-elliptical to semilunar-elliptical; in M3, it can be atractoid; the lingual border of the protocone is more or less concave except on P2 where it is sometimes straight; the protocone is usually more projected anteriorly in the molars than in the premolars; in the same tooth row, the postprotoconal groove is deeper in the premolars than in the molars (APL-148). The hypocone is rounded-elliptical shaped; hypoconal islets are common on M3; the hypoconal groove is pointed and relatively deeper in the premolars than in the molars. The pli caballin is usually present and single on all cheek teeth, and it disappears in the very worn teeth; on premolars, it is more elongated than on molars.

4.1.4. Lower Dentition

The length of the lower cheek tooth row is 194.7 mm. The linguaflexid is V-shaped on the lower cheek teeth; on APL-295, 570, 785, it is deeper and pointed, while on APL-633, 792, it is shallow and wider. The linguaflexid is V-shaped. The metaconid is relatively wide and rounded. The metastylid is slightly smaller than the metaconid but also rounded, and its lingual border tends to be more pointed in the premolars than in the molars. On APL-295, there is a “bridge” between the metaconid and metastylid on the first molar. The entoconid is squarish in the premolars, while in the molars is more elliptical. The postflexid is longer than the preflexid in the premolars, while in the molars, it is shorter. The parastylid is usually half-open except in the advanced worn teeth (APL-355), where it is closed. Ectoflexid is shallow and pointed in the premolars, while in the molars is deeper, reaching the mesio-lingual corner of the postflexid, without, however, penetrating the isthmus; only in APL-355, the ectoflexid of m2 and m3 and in the m1/2, APL-369, is very deep penetrating the isthmus. The pli caballinid is usually absent except for some slightly unworn teeth (APL-139, 137, 345, 369, 785), where it is small to rudimentary. In the same tooth rows, the enamel of the postflexid in the premolars is slightly plicated, while in the molars is mainly unplicated; there is a single pli in the preflexid of p4 in APL-345 and 295, as well as of m3 in APL-785 and 301. The protostylid is present in all cheek teeth, but it is more frequent in the premolars; it is not isolated, but it appears as a simple and shallow plication; in the same specimen (mandible APL-570), it is present in the left m1 and m2, while it is extremely weak (m1) or even absent (m2) in the right ones.

4.1.5. Metapodials

The third metapodials are elongated and relatively robust (Figure 7a–h). The slenderness index, distal maximal articular breadth (meas. 11)/maximal length (meas. 1)% ranges from 19.8–20.9 (n = 16; mean = 20.5) for the third metacarpals, and from 16.1–18.1 (n = 23; mean = 17.1) for the third metatarsals. The morphology of the articular surfaces for the lateral metapodials is variable. The distal maximal supra-articular breadth at the trochlea (meas. 11) is greater than at the tubercles (meas. 10) on the metatarsals. The distal keel is well developed; the keel index (distal maximal anteroposterior diameter of the keel (meas. 12)/distal minimal DAP of the lateral condyle (meas. 13)% varies between 125.1 and 132.9 (n = 20; mean = 128.1) for the third metacarpals, and from 127.5–146.0 (n = 28; mean = 134.6) for the third metatarsals.

5. Comparisons

As already mentioned by [41], one of the most important differences between E. apolloniensis and E. stenonis is the depth of the narial notch. E. stenonis, along with E. stehlini, E. senezensis, and E. mygdoniensis, are characterized by a deep narial notch ending above the third premolar [22,75,76]. In Apollonia 1 crania, the narial notch is shallow, and its hinder margin is situated above the mesostyle of P2. Furthermore, no preorbital fossa is traced in APL crania, unlike the typical cranium of E. stenonis (IGF 560), where it is weak but clearly developed [46,75,77]. A depression on the occiput of APL crania is also lacking, unlike in E. stenonis and E. mygdoniensis. Unfortunately, the supraoccipital crest, which could give more information, is missing from all crania of E. apolloniensis. Moreover, as the distance between the vomerine notch and the basion (meas. 4) can be interpreted as an estimation of the braincase [78]; the braincase of E. apolloniensis seems to be relatively larger than that of E. stenonis vireti compared to the basilar length (meas. 6).
The cranium of E. apolloniensis (n = 6) is distinguished easily from that of E. mygdoniensis from Gerakarou (Mygdonian Basin, Greece) by its larger dimensions (Figure 8). In comparison with E. stenonis, the cranium of E. apolloniensis is characterized by the shorter muzzle and palatal length (meas. 1, 2), wider choanae (meas. 12), longer cheek tooth rows (meas. 7, 8, 9), narrower muzzle (meas. 14, 15), quite shorter naso-incisival notch (meas. 30) and longer cheek length (meas. 31) (Figure 8).
E. apolloniensis resembles E. senezensis in the basilar length and the short muzzle (meas. 6, 1), but it differs, having larger cheek tooth rows (meas. 7, 8, 9), wider choanae (meas. 12), wider muzzle (meas. 14, 15), shorter naso-incisival notch (meas. 30), and remarkably longer cheek length (meas. 31). In comparison with E. mosbachensis, E. apolloniensis has a shorter basilar length (meas. 6), similar cheek tooth rows length (meas. 7, 8, 9), and wider muzzle at the incisors (meas. 15); the minimal muzzle breadth seems to be quite smaller in E. mosbachensis. In the Greek fossil record, there is a partial cranium from the locality Alykes in Thessaly (Αλ-20, University of Athens), the few dimensions, of which fits quite well with those of E. apolloniensis (Figure 8) and it is mentioned as E. cf. apolloniensis by [54]. Unfortunately, the lack of adult crania of E. altidens, E. granatensis, E. suessenbornensis and E. wuesti does not permit any further comparison.
The protocone of stenonoid horses is usually short, relatively to the tooth height. E. mygdoniensis, E. senezensis and E., granatensis display rather short protocones similarly to E. stenonis [22,76,79]. The lingual border of the protocone is concave on E. apolloniensis (see also [41]), and its distal part is clearly more pronounced like in E. altidens and E. suessenbornensis though not far from the condition seen in E. s. vireti. The postprotoconal groove of E. apolloniensis is deeper than in E. stenonis. Likely, E. suessenbornensis, the buccal side of the fossettes in APL-147 (teeth at the fourth stage of wear), is wrinkled (Figure 5e). On E. apolloniensis, pli caballin is present; on APL-148 (teeth at the first stage of wear), pli caballin is multiple on the premolars with a very large base, resembling sussemiones [80]; however, it reduces in size by the progressive attrition and disappears at the final wear stages. The shape of the double knot varies from a typically rounded stenonoid, separated by a pointed and deep linguaflexid (APL-295, 570, 785) to a rather hemionine type with an elongated metaconid and pointed metastylid separated by a shallow and wide linguaflexid (APL-633, 792). In these features, the APL horse resembles E. granatensis [81], from which (and sussemiones in general) differs in the shallow ectoflexid on the molars that recalls for hemiones and asses [71]. Ectoflexid on APL-355 (on m2 and m3) and APL-369 is very deep penetrating the isthmus. These specimens could belong to the second species identified in Apollonia 1; however, no οther differences in the morphology or size were observed to assign them to a separate taxon. The presence of a “bridge” on the first molar of APL-295 is a character that appears on both wild asses and hemiones [71]. The presence of the pli protostylid on the lower premolars and molars (except on p2 of E. apolloniensis) is a character that usually occurs in the sussemiones [71,80].
The third metacarpal of E. apolloniensis is distinguished from E. mygdoniensis, E. senezensis and Libakos, due to its larger dimensions (Figure 9a,c) and from E. suessenbornensis and E. mosbachensis due to its smaller dimensions. E. apolloniensis has longer metacarpals (meas. 1) than almost all E. stenonis samples from Europe and Greece (Figures S1 and S2) except for Olivola, and the isochronous E. granatensis, which both seem rather like APL (Figure 9b,c). However, E. apolloniensis has deeper and narrower metacarpal diaphysis (meas. 3,4) than E. stenonis from Greece and Europe (Figure 9a,b). This means a relatively slenderer metacarpal, unlike all E. stenonis samples, except for that from Volax; this is probably due to the small number of specimens from the latter site (only three). Some more differences are seen in the distal epiphysis. The metacarpal of the Volax equid is wider with a slightly stronger keel and the deeper trochlea (meas. 10–14). The metacarpal proportions of E. apolloniensis seems to be closer to those of E. stenonis from St.-Vallier, from which it differs in the greater maximal length (meas. 1), the narrower diaphysis (meas. 3), the less wide breadth at the tubercles (meas. 10), the deeper trochlea (meas. 13, 14), the larger articular facet for os magnum, and the quite larger articular facet for os hamatum (meas. 8) (Figure 9b). Although the maximal length of the third metacarpal of E. apolloniensis is close to those of the European taxa E. granatensis and E. altidens, all the other dimensions are quite larger, distinguishing it well from them and suggesting for it a more robust appearance (Figure 9c). The third metacarpal of E. apolloniensis and E. wuesti seem to have similar proportions, but the latter is significantly longer (meas. 1). Thus, the metacarpal of E. wuesti appears slenderer with narrower trochlea (meas. 11), weaker keel (meas. 12), and considerably wider articular facet for the os hamatum (meas. 8) than those of E. apolloniensis (Figure 9c).
The third metatarsal of E. apolloniensis is longer (meas. 1) than all E. stenonis samples from Greece and Europe (Figure 10a,b and Figures S1 and S2). Along with E. wuesti, it seems intermediate between the metatarsals of E. stenonis and the middle Pleistocene equids E. suessenbornensis and E. mosbachensis (Figures S1 and S2). Its diaphysis and proximal epiphysis have similar proportions with E. stenonis, except for E. stenonis from Dafnero 1, 3, which is characterized by a less deep diaphysis (meas. 4) and from Sésklo and Dafnero 1, 3, both showing a less deep proximal articular facet (meas. 6). Furthermore, the articular breadth at the trochlea (meas. 11) is greater than the suprarticular breadth at the tubercles (meas. 10), unlike all E. stenonis except for Dafnero 1, 3 and Volax (Figure 10a,b). Comparing with the European E. stenonis, E. apolloniensis has a longer metatarsal (meas. 1) with deeper trochlea (meas. 13, 14) and a larger articular facet for cuboid (meas. 8) (Figure 10b). Like the third metacarpals, the third metatarsal of E. stenonis from St.-Vallier is close to E. apolloniensis, but its remarkably shorter maximal length (meas. 1) distinguishes it well from the latter taxon (Figure 10b). The third metatarsal of E. granatensis, E. altidens, and E. senezensis are smaller than that of E. apolloniensis (Figure 10c). E. wuesti is slightly longer (meas. 1) than E. apolloniensis, but it clearly differs in the larger proximal articular dimensions (meas. 5, 6) and the considerably larger articular facets for cuneiform and cuboid (meas. 7, 8). E. apolloniensis and E. suessenbornensis metatarsals have similar proportions, but the latter species has a significantly larger third metatarsal (Figure 10c). In both taxa, the distal articular breadth (meas. 11) seems larger relatively to the suprarticular breadth at the tubercles (meas. 10). The third metatarsals of E. apolloniensis are well separated from those of E. mosbachensis and E. suessenbornensis by their quite smaller size (Figure 9 and Figure 10c).
The PERMANOVA results for both the metacarpals and metatarsals indicate a significant difference between the species (Table S1), and they agree with Simpson’s ratio diagrams and PCA (Figure 9 and Figure 10 and Figure S2). Metacarpals of E. apolloniensis appear statistically different from almost all E. stenonis representatives apart from E. stenonis from Olivola, Sésklo and Volax, the latter, however, known by a single complete specimen. E. wuesti is close to E. apolloniensis yet statistically different. Metatarsals of E. apolloniensis are again different from all the other species; Volax is also represented here by only one specimen.
Equus sp.
Locality: Apollonia 1, Mygdonia Basin, Macedonia, Greece.
Age: Epivillafranchian (latest Early Pleistocene).
Material: Third metacarpal, APL-74; third phalanges APL-394, 429, 868
Measurements: The measurements are given in Table S3.
Description and comparison. Among the Apollonia 1 metacarpals, APL-74 (Figure 7i) is quite larger than the mean of E. apolloniensis (Figure 9c). The slenderness index (distal breadth at the tubercles (meas. 11)/maximal length (meas. 1) % is 21.2 for APL-74 versus 20.4 (n = 16, min = 19.6, max = 20.9) on average for E. apolloniensis, indicating a more robust metacarpal. The keel index (distal maximal anteroposterior diameter of the keel (meas. 12)/distal minimal DAP of the lateral condyle (meas. 13) % is 121.4 for APL-74 versus 128.2 (n = 23, min = 125.1, max = 132.9) for E. apolloniensis indicating a relatively less developed keel.
These features of APL-74 are closer to E. mosbachensis and E. suessenbornensis (Figure 9c). Nevertheless, compared to E. mosbachensis, APL-74 has a similar maximal length (meas. 1) and proportions, but narrower diaphysis, deeper proximal articular facet (meas. 6), less developed keel (meas. 12) and wider articular facets for the os magnum and os hamatum (meas. 7, 8). In comparison with E. suessenbornensis, APL-74 is shorter with narrower diaphysis (meas. 3) and distal epiphysis (meas. 10, 11) (Figure 9). APL-74 could belong to one of these large equids, but the poor material cannot go any further. Furthermore, three third phalanges were separated from E. apolloniensis because they are much wider. Their maximal breadth is 72.6 (n = 3, min = 69.8, max = 74.5) versus 63.31 (n = 7, min = 62.19, max = 64.75) in E. apolloniensis. Besides these specimens, there are some more postcranial fragments, which also have larger sizes and could belong to the same equid taxon. Thus, it is better to separate this metacarpal from the E. apolloniensis sample, waiting for more material.

6. Discussion

The arrival of the monodactyl equids in Eurasia and their dispersal towards Europe is one of the most significant events that mark the beginning of the Quaternary period (EquusElephant event) [82]. Despite the rich fossil record of equids from several localities and the numerous studies upon them, their taxonomy, phylogenetic relationships and chronological distribution are still discussed ([47,60,65,75,77,79,80,82,83,84,85,86,87,88,89,90,91,92,93,94,95,96,97,98] and ref. therein). The lack of complete or well-preserved crania from the Early Pleistocene European record makes the comparisons rather difficult.
Authors disagree regarding the phylogeny of the Early and Middle Pleistocene equids (E. granatensis, E. altidens, E. suessenbornensis, E. wuesti, E. apolloniensis) and whether these species originated from America, Asia, and/or Africa. According to [80], species like E. suessenbornensis, E. granatensis and E. altidens are included in the sussemione-group due to their peculiar dental features; this group is supposed to originate from North America, and it is not linked with stenonoid equids (e.g., Allohippus). However, other authors do not consent to this approach, considering these species belonging to the stenonoid group [65,77,79,83,94,95,96]. According to these authors, these species were locally evolved in Europe from a stenonoid stock adapting to environmental conditions and climatic changes [96].
The exact taxonomic position of E. apolloniensis and its phylogenetic relationships to the stenonoid equids is a matter of debate [41,61,96,99,100]. Equus apolloniensis was originally described as a species with both stenonoid and caballoid features [41]. The shorter muzzle, the more elongated protocones (which occurred at 1.2–0.7 Ma, [100] and the slender metapodials indicate an advanced species adapted to dry-cool habitats. According to [41], E. apolloniensis could “represent a transitional form from the typical E. stenonis to the middle Pleistocene horses (Equus ex gr. E. suessenbornensis). According to [61], E. apolloniensis shares great similarities in the morphology of the teeth and the general proportions of the metapodials with extant wild asses (E. africanus), and thus it could represent “a step within the lineage of asses soon after their differentiation”. Furthermore, similarities with E. mygdoniensis, E. altidens from Pirro Nord, E. granatensis and E. wuesti on either the metapodials and/or the tooth morphology make relationships of E. apolloniensis more complicate.
Based on the basicranial proportions, [61,99] consider E. apolloniensis as a true Equus along with E. suessenbornensis and other equids. [78,101] distinguish the crania of true Equus from the primitive Plesippus and Allohippus, using Franck’s index (vomerine length (meas. 3)/post-vomerine length (meas. 4)%) and the palatal index (palatal length (meas. 2)/vomerine length (meas. 3)%). In the best-preserved specimen APL-148, Franck’s index is 112, indicating that vomerine length is longer than post-vomerine one, contrary to the true horses, and it is similar to asses and donkeys [78]. On the other hand, the palatal index on APL-148 and APL-872 is 103 and 104.3, respectively, indicating a slightly longer palate than vomerine length, a character of true Equus. Consequently, E. apolloniensis must be assigned to Equus, though not to the caballine forms. It is likely the oldest occurrence of a cranium belonging to a true Equus (non caballine) in Europe [99,100], while E. mosbachensis von Reichenau, 1915 dated at 0.5 Ma, is believed to be the first evidence of a caballine equid [101,102].
Considering all mentioned above, the following hypotheses could be formulated:
(a)
E. apolloniensis could be an intermediate form between E. stenonis and the middle Pleistocene equid, E. suessenbornensis. Although the general size of the metapodials of E. apolloniensis is similar to those of E. stenonis, the proportions fit better with the slender but smaller E. altidens from Pirro Nord and E. mygdoniensis. In other words, there is an obvious proportional analogy associated with a size increase through time from the metapodials of E. mygdoniensis and E. altidens from Pirro Nord to those of E. apolloniensis (Figure 9) (see also [41]). E. apolloniensis may originate from an E. mygdoniensisE. altidens stock-keeping similar proportions on the metapodials but increasing in size. Ref. [103] suggested that E. mygdoniensis, E. altidens, and perhaps E. wuesti and E. apolloniensis could represent different local species or ecomorphotypes of the same lineage. Although this scenario cannot be ruled out with the available data, differences on the crania (at least with the better-known E. mygdoniensis) contradict the hypothesis of local ecomorphotypes and rather support the idea of different species from the same lineage. The affinities with E. suessenbornensis at the distal articulations of the metapodials (analogies between meas. 10–11) could also support a link between the two species. This hypothesis rather supports the idea that both species, E. suessenbornensis and possibly E. apolloniensis, evolved in Europe and belonged to stenonoid lineage.
(b)
Based on similarities of both upper and especially lower teeth and metapodials, Ref. [61] noted affinities between E. apolloniensis and the modern wild asses (E. africanus). If indeed, as these authors state, E. apolloniensis represents an early step in the lineage of asses, it cannot be linked to stenonoid s. s. and E. suessenbornensis [100]. Although the lower teeth of the mandible APL-570 are ass-like, the revised description of both old and new material suggests that E. apolloniensis resembles asses as much as hemiones.
Considering all mentioned above, similarities of E. apolloniensis with the stenonoid horses and the proportional similarities of its metapodials with E. mygdoniensis and E. altidens from Pirro Nord rather support the first hypothesis.

7. Conclusions

As Apollonia is dated at the beginning of the 1.2–0.9 Ma interval [58], it represents the most complete Epivillafranchian faunal assemblage in southeastern Europe, a period with increased climatic variability in subtropical Africa [104] and a significant faunal turnover in the western Palearctic [59]. The result of these progressive environmental-related modifications of the faunal assemblages is recorded in the Mygdonia Basin by the replacement of the primitive stenonoid horses (E. stenonis, E. mygdoniensis) by the medium-large size E. apolloniensis, which was adapted to the open landscapes indicated by its shorter muzzle (following Allen’s rule) and slenderer metapodials. Ιn Southwestern Europe, primitive equids are being replaced at about 1.5–1.4 Ma by the slender, middle-sized E. granatensis (Venta Micena LFA, Spain) and E. altidens (Selvella, Pirro Nord LFA, Italy), while the larger E. suessenbornensis also occurred in Selvella and Pirro Nord (Italy) and in Barranco León 5 and Fuente Nueva 3 (Spain) [65,105]. The presence of two species of Equus in Apollonia 1 fits its young age. According to [106], usually, one equid species was present in the European faunas from the Early Pleistocene (~2.5–1.7 Ma).
The co-existence of two species becomes more frequent in younger localities, such as in Tsiotra Vryssi (Greece), Akhalkalaki (Georgia), Selvella-Gioiella and Pirro Nord (Italy), Fuente Nueva-3 and Barranco León-5 (Spain), and maybe three species in Süssenborn (Germany) [31,60,65].
The geographical distribution of E. apolloniensis seems to be rather limited in southeastern Europe (Eastern Mediterranean), with the possible first occurrence in Tsiotra Vryssi, Greece (1.78–1.5 Ma, [31,107]), Platanochori-1 [31] and Alykes (~1.6 Ma, [54]). A similar form is also reported from the Homo erectus bearing Kocabaş-Denizli mammal locality (1.3–1.1 Ma; [108,109]).

Supplementary Materials

The Supplementary Materials includes the principal component analysis and the box-plot diagrams of the maximal length of the Apollonia 1 metapodials than other early middle Pleistocene equids from Europe. It also includes the raw data and their statistics for the crania, mandibles and metapodials of the Apollonia equids. The following are available online at https://0-www-mdpi-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.3390/quat4020012/s1, Figure S1: Box-plot diagrams comparing the maximal length of the metapodials of E. apolloniensis with various Greek and European taxa of Equus, Figure S2: principal component analysis (PCA), loading the metapodial dimensions of E. apolloniensis and various equid taxa from Greece and Europe, Table S1: Results of One-way PERMANOVA for the metacarpals (lower left) and metatarsals (upper right) of Equus apolloniensis and other European equids (p-values, A 95), Table S2: Cranial and mandibular dimensions and statistics of Equus apolloniensis, Table S3: Metacarpal dimensions and statistics of Equus apolloniensis, Table S4: Metatarsal dimensions and statistics of Equus apolloniensis.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.G.G., G.D.K., and D.S.K.; data curation, A.G.G., G.D.K., and D.S.K.; formal analysis, A.G.G., G.D.K., and D.S.K., funding, A.G.G., G.D.K., and D.S.K., investigation, G.D.K., and D.S.K. methodology, A.G.G.; project administration, G.D.K., and D.S.K., Resources, A.G.G., G.D.K., and D.S.K., software, A.G.G.; supervision, G.D.K., and D.S.K., validation, A.G.G., G.D.K., and D.S.K.; visualization, A.G.G., G.D.K.; writing—original draft, A.G.G.; writing—review and editing, A.G.G., G.D.K., and D.S.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) through the Operational Program “Human Resources Development, Education and Lifelong Learning” in the context of the Project “Strengthening Human Resources Research Potential via Doctorate Research” (MIS-5000432), implemented by the State Scholarships Foundation (IKY). Research in Apollonia-1 was supported by grants of the Research Committee of the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (Projects 1396 and 87845) awarded to G. Koufos and D. Kostopoulos and by the European Research Council StG 283503 (PaGE) awarded to K. Harvati (University of Tübingen). GK is supported by the European Research Council CoG 724703 (CROSSROADS) awarded to K. Harvati.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available in the Supplementary Materials.

Acknowledgments

A.G.G. thanks Athanassios Athanassiou (Ministry of Culture, Ephorate of Palaeoanthropology-Speleology) for providing access to unpublished material and for providing his personal data. Furthermore, A.G.G. thanks Ralf-Dietrich Kahlke (Senckenberg Research Station of Quaternary Palaeontology in Weimar) for providing access to the equids collection from Süssenborn and Gerald Utschig and Dennis Rössler for their assistance. A.G.G. also thanks Elisabetta Cioppi and Luca Bellucci for providing access to the equid collections stored at the Natural History Museum in Florence. Many thanks to Loïc Costeur for providing access to the equid Pleistocene collections stored at the Natural History Museum Basel. A.G.G. thanks Emmanuel Robert (Claude Bernard University Lyon 1) and Didier Berthet (Musée des Confluences) for giving permission to study the collections at their disposal and François Vigoroux for his assistance (Centre de Conservation du Musée des Confluences). A.G.G. thanks Dominique Armand (University of Bordeaux) and Stéphane Madelaine (Musée national de Préhistoire, Les Eyzies-de-Tayac-Sireuil) for providing access to the equid collections and Anne-Marie Gadioux for her assistance. A.G.G. thanks Christine Banassat (Mayor of Chilhac) and Véronique Brissaud for providing access to the equid collection from Musée de Paléontologie Christian Guth de Chilhac. Finally, A.G.G. sincerely thanks Gildas Merceron (University of Poitiers) for the further financial support. We are also grateful to Véra Eisenmann for sharing all her data on extant and fossil equids on her public database. Many thanks to Véra Eisenmann and the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments greatly improving the manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

Localities:
ALKAlykes (Thessaly, Greece);
APLApollonia (Macedonia, Greece);
CHChilhac (France);
CHRChrysavgi, (Macedonia, Greece);
DFN, DFN3Dafnero 1, 3 (Macedonia, Greece);
GERGerakarou 1 (Macedonia, Greece);
KAL, KLTKalamoto 1, 2 (Macedonia, Greece);
KRI, KRMKrimni 1, 2 (Macedonia, Greece);
LIBLibakos (Macedonia, Greece);
MARMarathousa 1 (Macedonia, Greece);
PLNPlatanochori (Macedonia, Greece);
PNPirro Nord;
RIZRiza 1 (Macedonia, Greece);
RVLRavin Voulgarakis (Macedonia, Greece);
SESSésklo (Thessaly, Greece);
SUSüssenborn (Germany);
SESenèze (France);
SGSelvella-Gioiella;
StVSaint-Vallier (France);
TSRTsiotra Vryssi (Macedonia, Greece);
VOLVolax (Macedonia, Greece);
VSLVassiloudi (Macedonia, Greece)
Other:
McIIIthird metacarpal;
MtIIIthird metatarsal;
DAPantero-posterior diameter;
meas. Xmeasurement X;
PCAprincipal component analysis;
FmFormation

References

  1. Melentis, J.K. Die dentition der Pleistozänen proboscidier des Beckens von Megalopolis im Peloponnes (Griechenland). Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 1961, 12, 153–262. [Google Scholar]
  2. Melentis, J.K. Über Equus abeli aus dem Mittelpleistozän des Beckens von Megalopolis im Peloponnes (Griechenland). Proc. Acad. Athens 1963, 38, 507–519. [Google Scholar]
  3. Melentis, J.K. Die Pleistozänen Nashörner der Beckens von Megalopolis im Peloponnes (Griechenland). Ann. Géologiques Des. Pays Helléniques 1965, 16, 363–402. [Google Scholar]
  4. Melentis, J.K. Über Hippopotamus antiquus DESMAREST aus dem Mittelpleistozän des Beckens von Megalopolis in Peloponnes (Griechenland). Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 1965, 16, 403–435. [Google Scholar]
  5. Sickenberg, O. Eine säugetierfauna des tieferen Biharius aus dem Becken von Megalopolis (Peloponnes, Griechenland). Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 1975, 27, 25–73. [Google Scholar]
  6. Forsyth-Mayor, C.I. Faune mammalogische delle isole di Kos e di Samos (let al prof. B. Meneghini). Atti della Soc. Ital. Sci. Nat. 1887, 5, 272–275. [Google Scholar]
  7. Brunn, J.H. Contribution a l’etude geologique du Pinde Septenrional et d’une partie de la Macedoine occidentale. Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 1956, 7, 1–358. [Google Scholar]
  8. Sickenberg, O. Revision der wirbeltierfauna der höhle Petralona (Griech. Macedonien). Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 1971, 23, 230–264. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sickenberg, O. Die unterpleistozäne fauna von Wolkas (Griech.-Mazedonien): I. Eine neue giraffe (Macedonitherium Martinii nov. gen. nov. spec.) aus dem unteren Pleistozän von Griechenland. Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 1967, 18, 314–330. [Google Scholar]
  10. Sickenberg, O. Die unterpleistozäne fauna von Wolkas (Griech.-Mazedonien): II. die carnivoren. Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 1968, 19, 621–646. [Google Scholar]
  11. Marinos, G. Contribution to the study of the Pleistocene of Mecedonia. Sci. Ann. Fac. Phys. Math. Aristotle Univercity Thessalon. 1964, 9, 95–111. [Google Scholar]
  12. Paraskevaidis, I. Canis und Equus aus Attika. Neues Jahrb. für Geol. Paläontologie Abh. 1953, 96, 453–496. [Google Scholar]
  13. Paraskevaidis, I. Saugetierreste aus Griechenland. In Proceedings of the VI Colloquium on the Geology of the Aegean Region, Athens; Kommission bei Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 1977; Volume 3, pp. 1143–1154. [Google Scholar]
  14. Sakellariou-Mane, H.; Psilovikos, A.; Koufos, G.D. Contribution to the study of Villafranchian in N. Chalkidiki. Sci. Ann. Fac. Phys. Math. Aristotle Univercity Thessalon. 1979, 19, 279–296. [Google Scholar]
  15. Koufos, G.D. A new late Pleistocene (Würmian) mammal locality from the basin of Drama (northern Greece). Sci. Ann. Fac. Phys. Math. Aristotle Univercity Thessalon. 1981, 21, 129–148. [Google Scholar]
  16. Symeonidis, N.K.; Tataris, A. The first results of the geological and palaeontological study of the Sesklo basin and its broader environment (eastern Thessaly, Greece). Ann. Géol. Pays Hellén 1983, 31, 146–190. [Google Scholar]
  17. Koufos, G.D.; Melentis, J.K. New data from the Villafranchian mammal locality of Gerakarou (Macedonia, Greece). Proc. Acad. Athens 1983, 58, 181–185. [Google Scholar]
  18. Koufos, G.D.; Syrides, G.E.; Koliadimou, K.K. A new Pleistocene mammal locality from Mygdonia basin (Macedonia, Greece). Contribution to the study of Villafranchian (Villanyian) in c. Macedonia. Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece 1988, 23, 113–124. [Google Scholar]
  19. Koufos, G.D.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Koliadimou, K.K. Un nouveau gisement de mammifères dans le Villafranchien de Macédoine occidentale (Grèce). Comptes Rendus Acad. des Sci. Ser. II Sci. la Terre des Planetes 1991, 313, 831–836. [Google Scholar]
  20. Koufos, G.D.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Koliadimou, K.K.; Syridis, G. Apollonia, a new vertebrate site in the Pleistocene of the Mygdonia Basin (Macedonia, Greece)-the first fossil fresh-water mollusks in the area. Comptes Rendus Acad. des Sci. Ser. II Sci. la Terre des Planetes 1992, 315, 1041–1046. [Google Scholar]
  21. Koufos, G.D. The Pleistocene carnivores of the Mygdonia basin (Macedonia, Greece). Ann. Paléontologie 1992, 78, 205–257. [Google Scholar]
  22. Koufos, G.D. Early Pleistocene equids from Mygdonia basin (Macedonia, Greece). Palaeontogr. Ital. 1992, 79, 168–199. [Google Scholar]
  23. Kostopoulos, D.S. The Plio–Pleistocene Artiodactyls of Macedonia (N. Greece). Systematics, Palaeoecology, Biochronology, Biostratigraphy. Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  24. Kostopoulos, D.S. The Plio-Pleistocene artiodactyls (Vertebrata, Mammalia) of Macedonia 1. The fossiliferous site “Apollonia-1”, Mygdonia basin of Greece. Geodiversitas 1997, 19, 845–875. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kostopoulos, D.S. The Plio-Pleistocene artiodactyls from Macedonia, Greece: 2. The fossilirerous locality of Volakas, VOL (Volakas Basin, Drama, NE Greece). Paleontol. I Evol. 1997, 30–31, 83–92. [Google Scholar]
  26. Kostopoulos, D.S.; Koufos, G.D. The Plio-Pleistocene artiodactyls of Macedonia (northern Greece) and their biostratigraphic significance; preliminary report. Comptes Rendus-Acad. des Sci. Ser. II Sci. la Terre des Planetes 1994, 318, 1267–1272. [Google Scholar]
  27. Athanassiou, A. Contribution to the Study of the Fossil Mammals of Thessaly. Ph.D. Thesis, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece, 1998. [Google Scholar]
  28. Athanassiou, A. New data on the Equus stenonis Cocchi, 1867 from the late Pliocene locality of Sésklo (Thessaly, Greece). Geodiversitas 2001, 23, 439–469. [Google Scholar]
  29. Athanassiou, A. A Villafranchian Hipparion-bearing mammal fauna from Sésklo (E. Thessaly, Greece): Implications for the question of Hipparion–Equus sympatry in Europe. Quaternary 2018, 1, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Maniakas, I. Contribution to the Study of Chrono-Spatial Distribution of Palaeocological Adaptations of European Pleistocene Bovini Based on Ecomorphological Analyses and Geometric Morphometrics. Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2019. [Google Scholar]
  31. Konidaris, G.E.; Tourloukis, V.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Thompson, N.; Giusti, D.; Michailidis, D.; Koufos, G.D.; Harvati, K. Two new vertebrate localities from the Early Pleistocene of Mygdonia Basin (Macedonia, Greece): Preliminary results. Compt. Rendus Palevol. 2015, 14, 353–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Konidaris, G.E.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Koufos, G.D. Mammuthus meridionalis (Nesti, 1825) from Apollonia-1 (Mygdonia basin, northern Greece) and its importance within the Early Pleistocene mammoth evolution in Europe. Geodiversitas 2020, 42, 69–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Koufos, G.D. Late Pliocene carnivores from western Macedonia (Greece). Paläontologische Z. 1993, 67, 357–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Steensma, K.J. Plio-Pleistozäne Großsäugetiere (Mammalia) Aus Dem Becken von Kastoria/Grevena, Südlich von Neapolis-NW Griechenland. Ph.D. Thesis, Technische Universität Clausthal, Clausthal, Germany, 1988. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tsoukala, E. Contribution to the Study of the Pleistocene Fauna of large Mammals (Carnivora, Perissodactyla, Artiodactyla) from Petralona Cave, Chalkidiki (N. Greece). Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1989. [Google Scholar]
  36. Tsoukala, E.; Chatzopoulou, K. A new Early Pleistocene (Latest Villafranchian) site with mammals in Kalamoto (Mygdonia basin, Macedonia, Greece)-preliminary report. Mitt. Komm. Quartärforsch. Österr. Akad. Wiss. 2005, 14, 213–233. [Google Scholar]
  37. Koufos, G.D.; Vlachou, T. Equus stenonis from the middle Villafranchian locality of Volax (Madeconia, Greece). Geodiversitas 1997, 19, 641–657. [Google Scholar]
  38. Koliadimou, K.K. Palaeontological and Biostratigraphical Study of the Neogene/Quaternary Micromammals from Mygdonia Basin. Ph.D. Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1996. [Google Scholar]
  39. Koufos, G.D.; Kostopoulos, D.S. A stenonoid horse (Equidae, Mammalia) from the Villafrnachian of western Macedonia (Greece). Bull. Geol. Soc. Greece 1993, 28, 131–143. [Google Scholar]
  40. Koufos, G.D.; Kostopoulos, D.S. New carnivore material from the Plio-Pleistocene of Macedonia (Greece) with a description of a new canid. Münchner Geowiss. Abh. 1997, 34, 33–63. [Google Scholar]
  41. Koufos, G.D.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Sylvestrou, I.A. Equus apolloniensis n. sp. (Mammalia, Equidae) from the latest Villafranchian locality of Apollonia, Macedonia, Greece. Paleontol. i Evol. 1997, 30–31, 49–76. [Google Scholar]
  42. Koufos, G.D.; Konidaris, G.E.; Harvati, K. Revisiting Ursus etruscus (Carnivora, Mammalia) from the Early Pleistocene of Greece with description of new material. Quat. Int. 2018, 497, 222–239. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Symeonidis, N.K. Fossil mammals of Lower Pleistocene (Villafranchian) age from the Sesklo basin (Volos). Ann. Géologiques Des. Pays Helléniques 1992, 35, 1–21. [Google Scholar]
  44. Azzaroli, A. Quaternary mammals and the “end-Villafranchian” dispersal event-a turning point in the history of Eurasia. Palaeogeogr. Palaeoclimatol. Palaeoecol. 1983, 44, 117–139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Alberdi, M.T.; Cerdeño, E.; López Martínez, N.; Morales, J.; Soria, M.D. La fauna Villafranquiense de El Rincón-1 (Albacete, Castilla-La Mancha). Estud. Geológicos 1997, 53, 69–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Bernor, R.L.; Cirilli, O.; Jukar, A.M.; Potts, R.; Buskianidze, M.; Rook, L. Evolution of early Equus in Italy, Georgia, the Indian subcontinent, east Africa, and the origins of African zebras. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Rook, L.; Bernor, R.L.; Avilla, L.S.; Cirilli, O.; Flynn, L.; Jukar, A.; Sanders, W.; Scott, E.; Wang, X. Mammal biochronology (land mammal ages) around the world from late Miocene to middle Pleistocene and major events in horse evolutionary history. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Cirilli, O.; Bernor, R.L.; Rook, L. New insights on the Early Pleistocene equids from Roca-Neyra (France, central Europe): Implications for the Hipparion LAD and the Equus FAD in Europe. J. Paleontol. 2020, 1–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eisenmann, V.; Brunet, M. Présence simultanée de cheval et d’hipparion dans le Villafranchien moyen de France à Roccaneyra (Puy-de-Dôme); etude critique de cas semblables; Europe et Proche-Orient). 1973. Available online: https://vera-eisenmann.com/IMG/pdf/4.Roccaneyra_OK.pdf (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  50. de Bruijn, H.; Dawson, M.R.; Mein, P. Upper Pliocene rodentia, lagomorpha and insectivora (Mammalia) from the isle of Rhodes (Greece). Proc. Kon. Nederl. Akad. Wetten 1970, 73, 535–584. [Google Scholar]
  51. Benda, L.; Meulenkamp, J.E.; Van de Weerd, A. Biostratigraphic correlations in the eastern Mediterranean Neogene. Newsl. Stratigr. 1977, 6, 117–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. van der Meulen, A.J.; Van Kolfschoten, T. Review of the Late Turolian to Early Biharian mammal faunas from Greece and Turkey. Mem Della Soc. Geol. Ital. 1986, 31, 201–211. [Google Scholar]
  53. Koufos, G.D.; Kostopoulos, D.S. The Plio-Pleistocene large mammal record of Greece: Implications for early human dispersals into Europe. In Paleoanthropology of the Balkans and Anatolia: Human Evolution and Its Context; Harvati, K., Roksandic, M., Eds.; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 269–280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Athanassiou, A. Neogene and Quaternary mammal faunas of Thessaly. Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 2002, 39, 279–293. [Google Scholar]
  55. Koufos, G.D.; Syrides, G.E.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Koliadimou, K.K. Preliminary results about thestratigraphy and the palaeoenvironment of Mygdonia Basin, Macedonia, Greece. Geobios 1995, 28, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Psilovikos, A. Paleogeographic Development of the Basin and Lake of Mygdonia (Lagada-Volvi Area, Greece). Ph.D Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  57. Koufos, G.D. New material and revision of the carnivora, mammalia from the lower Pleistocene locality Apollonia 1, Greece. Quaternary 2018, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Spassov, N. The Plio-Pleistocene vertebrate fauna in south-eastern Europe and the megafaunal migratory waves from the east to Europe. Rev. Paleobiol. 2003, 22, 197–229. [Google Scholar]
  59. Kahlke, R.D.; García, N.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Lacombat, F.; Lister, A.M.; Mazza, P.P.A.; Spassov, N.; Titov, V.V. Western Palaearctic palaeoenvironmental conditions during the Early and early Middle Pleistocene inferred from large mammal communities, and implications for hominin dispersal in Europe. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2011, 30, 1368–1395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Musil, R. Die equiden-reste aus dem Unterpleistozän von Untermassfeld. In Das Pleistozän von Untermassfeld Bei Meiningen (Thüringen). Teil 2, Monographien Des. RGZM; Kahlke, R.D., Ed.; Verl. d. Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums: Mainz, Germany, 2001; pp. 557–587. [Google Scholar]
  61. Eisenmann, V.; Boulbes, N. New results on equids from the Early Pleistocene site of Untermassfeld. In The Pleictocene of Untermassfeld Near Meiningen (Thüringen, Germany), Part. 4, Monographien Des. RGZM; Kahlke, R.-D., Ed.; Monographi; Römisch-Germanischen Zentralmuseums: Weimar, Germany, 2020; Volume 40, pp. 1295–1321. [Google Scholar]
  62. Eisenmann, V. Mosbach et E. mosbachensis. 2008. Available online: https://vera-eisenmann.com/-mosbach-et-e-mosbachensis- (accessed on 15 December 2020).
  63. Eisenmann, V. Les chevaux Equus (sensu lato) fossiles et actuels: Crânes et dents jugales supérieures. Cah Paléontologie 1980, 19, 1–186. [Google Scholar]
  64. Eisenmann, V. Venta Micena et Equus granatensis. 2011. Available online: https://vera-eisenmann.com/-venta-micena-et-equus-granatensis- (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  65. Alberdi, M.T.; Palombo, M.R. The Early to early Middle Pleistocene stenonoid horses from Italy. Quat. Int. 2013, 288, 25–44. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Gkeme, A.G. Study of the Pleiocene Equids of the Eltgen Collection (Localities Livakos, Kapetanios, Polylakkos, W. Macedonia). Master’s Thesis, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  67. Gkeme, A.G.; Koufos, G.D.; Kostopoulos, D.S. The Early Pleistocene stenonoid horse from Libakos and Polylakkos (Western Macedonia, Greece): Biochronological and palaeoecological implications and dispersal events. In Proceedings of the Abstracts of 15th Congress of the Regional Committee on Mediterranean Neogene Startigraphy: Exploring a ‘Physical Laboratory: The Mediterranean Basin’, Athens, Greece, 3–6 September 2017; p. 67. [Google Scholar]
  68. Simpson, G.G.; Roe, A. Quantitative Zoology: Numerical Concepts and Methods in the Study of Recent and Fossil Animals; McGraw-Hill Book Company: New York, NY, USA, 1939. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Eisenmann, V. Equus Grevyi. 2008. Available online: https://vera-eisenmann.com/ (accessed on 10 December 2020).
  70. Hammer, O. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol. Electron. 2001, 4, 1–9. [Google Scholar]
  71. Eisenmann, V. Double Knots of Lower Cheek Teeth. 2017. Available online: https://vera-eisenmann.com/double-knots-of-lower-cheek-teeth (accessed on 15 January 2021).
  72. Eisenmann, V. Family Equidae. In Koobi Fora Research Project: Vol. 2. The Fossil Ungulates: Proboscidea, Perissodactyla, and Suidae; Harris, J.M., Ed.; Clarendon Press: Oxford, UK, 1983; pp. 156–214. [Google Scholar]
  73. Eisenmann, V.; Alberdi, M.T.; De Giuli, C.; Staesche, U. Methodology. In Studying Fossil Horses, Collected Papers after the New York International Hipparion Conference, 1981; Leiden: New York, NY, USA, 1988; pp. 1–71. [Google Scholar]
  74. Smuts, M.M.S.; Penzhorn, B.L. Descriptions of anatomical differences between skulls and mandibles of Equus zebra and E. burchelli from southern Africa. Afr. Zool. 1988, 23, 328–336. [Google Scholar]
  75. Azzaroli, A. The two Villafranchian horses of the Upper Valdarno. Palaeontogr. Ital. 1965, 59, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  76. Eisenmann, V. The Senèze equids. 2017. Available online: https://veraeisenmann.com/the-seneze-equids-text (accessed on 20 December 2020).
  77. Azzaroli, A. The genus Equus in Europe. In European Neogene Mammal. Chronology, NATO ASI Series, Series A: Life Sciences, Vol. 180. NATO ASI S.; Lindsay, E.H., Fahlbusch, V., Mein, P., Eds.; Springer: New York, NY, USA, 1990; pp. 339–356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Eisenmann, V.; Baylac, M. Extant and fossil Equus (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) skulls: A morphometric definition of the subgenus Equus. Zool. Scr. 2000, 29, 89–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Alberdi, M.T.; Ortiz-Jaureguizar, E.; Prado, J.L. A quantitative review of European stenonoid horses. J. Paleontol. 1998, 72, 371–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Eisenmann, V. Sussemionus, a new subgenus of Equus (Perissodactyla, Mammalia). Compt. Rendus Biol. 2010, 333, 235–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Eisenmann, V. Equus granatensis of Venta Micena and evidence for primitive non-stenonid horses in the Lower Pleistocene. In The Hominids and Their Environment during the Lower and Middle Pleistocene of Eurasia, Proceedings of the International Conference of Human Palaeontology, Orce, Spain; Gilbert, J., Sanchez, F., Gilbert, L., Ribot, F., Eds.; Museo de Prehistoria y Paleontología: Calle Tiendas, Spain, 1999; pp. 175–189. [Google Scholar]
  82. Lindsay, E.H.; Opdyke, N.D.; Johnson, N.M. Pliocene dispersal of the horse Equus and Late Cenozoic mammalian dispersal events. Nature 1980, 287, 135–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Azzaroli, A. Ascent and decline of monodactyl equids a case for prehistoric overkill. Ann. Zool. Fennici. 1992, 28, 151–153. [Google Scholar]
  84. Azzaroli, A. Notes on some Middle and Late Pleistocene equids of Italy. Boll. Soc. Paleontol. Ital. 1999, 38, 97–108. [Google Scholar]
  85. Alberdi, M.T.; Caloi, L.; Palombo, M.R. The Quaternary fauna of Venosa: Equidae. Bull. Mus. d’Anthropology Préhistoric Monaco 1988, 31, 5–39. [Google Scholar]
  86. Alberdi, M.T.; Ortiz Jaureguizar, E.; Prado, J.L. Comments on “Equus species as stratigraphic markers. Reality or wishful thinking?” and “A review of Equus stenonis Cocchi (Perissodactyla, Equidae) and related forms” by A. Forsten. Quat. Sci. Rev. 2001, 20, 1149–1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Kaiser, T.M.; Bernor, R.L.; Scott, R.S.; Franzen, J.L.; Solounias, N. New interpretations of the systematics and palaeoecology of the Dorn-Dόrkheim 1 hipparions (Late Miocene, Turolian age [MN11]), Rheinhessen, Germany. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 2003, 83, 103–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Musil, R. Die Pferde aus der oberpliozänen Spaltenfüllung Schernfeld bei Eichstätt. Mitt. der Bayer Staatssamml. Palδontologie Hist. Geol. 1992, 32, 115–162. [Google Scholar]
  89. Eisenmann, V. Origins, dispersals, and migrations of Equus (Mammalia, Perissodactyla). Cour Forsch. Senckenb 1992, 153, 161–170. [Google Scholar]
  90. Eisenmann, V. Equus: An evolution without lineages? In Late Neogene and Quaternary Biodiversity and Evolution: Regional Developments and Interregional Correlations (Weimar: Terra Nostra), 18th International Senckenberg Conference 2004, VI International Palaeontological Colloquium in Weimar, Weimar, Germany, 25–30 April 2004; Alfred-Wegener-Stiftung: Berlin, Germany, 2004; pp. 101–104. [Google Scholar]
  91. Caloi, L. New forms of equids in western Europe and palaeoenvironmental changes. Geobios 1997, 30, 267–284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Caloi, L.; Palombo, M.R. Osservazioni sugli equidi Italiani del Pleistocene medio inferiore. Geol. Rom. 1987, 26, 187–221. [Google Scholar]
  93. Barrena, P.P.; Guerrero-Alba, S. Estudio morfométrico del caballo de Venta Micena (Orce, Granada) y su comparación con los équidos modernos y del Plio-Pleistoceno en el viejo y nuevo mundo. Paleontol. I Evol. 1997, 30, 93–148. [Google Scholar]
  94. Forstén, A. A review of Equus stenonis Cocchi (Perissodactyla, Equidae) and related forms. Quat. Sci. Rev. 1999, 18, 1373–1408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Palombo, M.R.; Alberdi, M.T.; Bellucci, L.; Sardella, R. An intriguing middle-sized horse from Coste San Giacomo (Anagni Basin, central Italy). Quat. Res. 2017, 87, 347–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Palombo, M.R.; Alberdi, M.T. Light and shadows in the evolution of South European stenonoid horses. Foss Impr. 2017, 73, 115–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. van der Made, J.; Rosell, J.; Blasco, R. Faunas from Atapuerca at the Early–Middle Pleistocene limit: The ungulates from level TD8 in the context of climatic change. Quat. Int. 2017, 433, 296–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  98. Azzaroli, A. On a Late Pleistocene ass from Tuscany, with notes on the history of asses. Palaeontogr. Ital. Pisa. 1979, 71, 27–47. [Google Scholar]
  99. Eisenmann, V.; Kuznetsova, T. Early Pleistocene equids (Mammalia, Perissodactyla) of Nalaikha, Mongolia, and the emergence of modern Equus Linnaeus, 1758. Geodiversitas 2004, 26, 535–561. [Google Scholar]
  100. Boulbes, N.; Van Asperen, E.N. Biostratigraphy and palaeoecology of European Equus. Front. Ecol. Evol. 2019, 7, 1–31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  101. Eisenmann, V. Discriminating Equus skulls: The Franck’s index and the new palatal index. In Equids in Time and Space: Papers in Honour of Véra Eisenmann, Proceedings of the Conference of the International Council of Archaeozoology, Durham, UK, 23–28 August 2002; Albarella, U., Dobney, K., Rowley-Conwy, P., Eds.; Oxbow Books: Oxford, UK, 2006; pp. 172–182. [Google Scholar]
  102. Maul, L.C.; Rekovets, L.; Heinrich, W.-D.; Keller, T.; Storch, G. Arvicola mosbachensis (Schmidtgen 1911) of Mosbach 2, A basic sample for the early evolution of the genus and a reference for further biostratigraphical studies. Senckenbergiana Lethaea 2000, 80, 129–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Palombo, M.R. Large mammals faunal dynamics in southwestern Europe during the late Early Pleistocene: Implications for the biochronological assessment and correlation of mammalian faunas. Alp. Mediterr. Quat. 2016, 29, 143–168. [Google Scholar]
  104. de Menocal, P.B. African climate change and faunal evolution during the Pliocene–Pleistocene. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2004, 220, 3–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Alberdi, M.T. Estudio de los caballos de los yacimientos de Fuente Nueva-3 y Barranco León-5 (Granada). In Ocupaciones Humanas En El Pleistoceno Inferior y Medio de La Cuenca de Guadix-Baza; Toro, I., Martínez-Navarro, B., Agustí, J., Monografías, A., de Andalucía, J., de Cultura, C., Eds.; Editorial Junta de Andalucia: Sevilla, Spain, 2010; pp. 221–306. [Google Scholar]
  106. Eisenmann, V. The primitive horses of the Vatera formation (Lesvos). Ann. Géologiques des Pays Helléniques 2002, 39, 131–153. [Google Scholar]
  107. Konidaris, G.E.; Kostopoulos, D.S.; Maron, M.; Schaller, M.; Ehlers, T.A.; Aidona, E.; Marini, M.; Tourloukis, V.; Muttoni, G.; Koufos, G.D. Dating of the Lower Pleistocene vertebrate site of Tsiotra Vryssi (Mygdonia Basin, Greece): Biochronology, magnetostratigraphy, and cosmogenic radionuclides. Quaternary 2021, 4, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Boulbes, N.; Mayda, S.; Titov, V.V.; Alcicek, M.C. The Late Villafranchian large mammals from the Denizli Basin travertines (southwest Anatolia, Turkey). LAnthropologie 2014, 118, 44–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Lebatard, A.-E.; Alçiçek, M.C.; Rochette, P.; Khatib, S.; Vialet, A.; Boulbes, N.; Bourlès, D.L.; Demory, F.; Guipert, G.; Mayda, S. Dating the Homo erectus bearing travertine from Kocabaş (Denizli, Turkey) at at least 1.1 Ma. Earth Planet. Sci. Lett. 2014, 390, 8–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) Geological map of the Neogene and Quaternary lithostratigraphic units of the Mygdonia Basin (map and data from [55]; modified by [31]); (b) simplified composite stratigraphic column of the Mygdonia Basin indicating the position of the fossiliferous localities.
Figure 1. (a) Geological map of the Neogene and Quaternary lithostratigraphic units of the Mygdonia Basin (map and data from [55]; modified by [31]); (b) simplified composite stratigraphic column of the Mygdonia Basin indicating the position of the fossiliferous localities.
Quaternary 04 00012 g001
Figure 2. Equus apolloniensis, APL-148; (ad) cranium, (a) ventral view, (b) dorsal view, (c) right lateral view, and (d) left lateral view.
Figure 2. Equus apolloniensis, APL-148; (ad) cranium, (a) ventral view, (b) dorsal view, (c) right lateral view, and (d) left lateral view.
Quaternary 04 00012 g002
Figure 3. Equus apolloniensis, APL-871; (ad) cranium, (a) ventral view, (b) dorsal view, (c) right lateral view, and (d) left lateral view.
Figure 3. Equus apolloniensis, APL-871; (ad) cranium, (a) ventral view, (b) dorsal view, (c) right lateral view, and (d) left lateral view.
Quaternary 04 00012 g003
Figure 4. Equus apolloniensis, APL-872; (ad) cranium, (a) ventral view, (b) dorsal view, (c) right lateral view, and (d) left lateral view.
Figure 4. Equus apolloniensis, APL-872; (ad) cranium, (a) ventral view, (b) dorsal view, (c) right lateral view, and (d) left lateral view.
Quaternary 04 00012 g004
Figure 5. Equus apolloniensis, APL-147; (ae) cranium, (a) ventral view, (b) dorsal view, (c) left lateral view, (d) occipital region, and (e) right tooth row.
Figure 5. Equus apolloniensis, APL-147; (ae) cranium, (a) ventral view, (b) dorsal view, (c) left lateral view, (d) occipital region, and (e) right tooth row.
Quaternary 04 00012 g005
Figure 6. Equus apolloniensis, (a1a4) mandible, APL-570, (a1) occlusal view, (a2) left tooth row, (a3) right lateral view, (a4) left lateral view; (b1b3) partial mandible, APL-785, (b1) occlusal view, (b2) right lateral view, (b3) left lateral view; (c) partial mandible, APL-792, occlusal view.
Figure 6. Equus apolloniensis, (a1a4) mandible, APL-570, (a1) occlusal view, (a2) left tooth row, (a3) right lateral view, (a4) left lateral view; (b1b3) partial mandible, APL-785, (b1) occlusal view, (b2) right lateral view, (b3) left lateral view; (c) partial mandible, APL-792, occlusal view.
Quaternary 04 00012 g006
Figure 7. Equus apolloniensis, (ad) third metacarpals, (a) APL-777, (b) APL-801, (c) APL-157, (d) APL-788; (ef) third metatarsals, (e) APL-848, (f) APL-92, (g) APL-880, (h) APL-237; Equus sp., (i) third metacarpal, APL-74.
Figure 7. Equus apolloniensis, (ad) third metacarpals, (a) APL-777, (b) APL-801, (c) APL-157, (d) APL-788; (ef) third metatarsals, (e) APL-848, (f) APL-92, (g) APL-880, (h) APL-237; Equus sp., (i) third metacarpal, APL-74.
Quaternary 04 00012 g007
Figure 8. Simpson’s log-ratio diagrams comparing the cranial dimensions of E. apolloniensis with other equids from Greece and Europe. Standard: Equus grevyi [69]. Data from [62,76] and personal dataset. For definitions of meas., see Supplementary Materials.
Figure 8. Simpson’s log-ratio diagrams comparing the cranial dimensions of E. apolloniensis with other equids from Greece and Europe. Standard: Equus grevyi [69]. Data from [62,76] and personal dataset. For definitions of meas., see Supplementary Materials.
Quaternary 04 00012 g008
Figure 9. Simpson’s log-ratio diagrams comparing the dimensions of the third metacarpal of E. apolloniensis with (a,b) Greek and European E. stenonis (c) and other Early/Middle Pleistocene horses. Standard: Equus grevyi [69]. Data from [61,62,63,64,65,76] and personal dataset. For definitions of meas., see Supplementary Materials.
Figure 9. Simpson’s log-ratio diagrams comparing the dimensions of the third metacarpal of E. apolloniensis with (a,b) Greek and European E. stenonis (c) and other Early/Middle Pleistocene horses. Standard: Equus grevyi [69]. Data from [61,62,63,64,65,76] and personal dataset. For definitions of meas., see Supplementary Materials.
Quaternary 04 00012 g009
Figure 10. Simpson’s log-ratio diagrams comparing the dimensions of the third metatarsal of E. apolloniensis with (a,b) Greek and European E. stenonis and (c) other Early/Middle Pleistocene horses. Standard: Equus grevyi [69]. Data from [61,62,63,64,65,80] and personal dataset. Definitions of meas., see Supplementary Materials.
Figure 10. Simpson’s log-ratio diagrams comparing the dimensions of the third metatarsal of E. apolloniensis with (a,b) Greek and European E. stenonis and (c) other Early/Middle Pleistocene horses. Standard: Equus grevyi [69]. Data from [61,62,63,64,65,80] and personal dataset. Definitions of meas., see Supplementary Materials.
Quaternary 04 00012 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Gkeme, A.G.; Koufos, G.D.; Kostopoulos, D.S. Reconsidering the Equids from the Early Pleistocene Fauna of Apollonia 1 (Mygdonia Basin, Greece). Quaternary 2021, 4, 12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/quat4020012

AMA Style

Gkeme AG, Koufos GD, Kostopoulos DS. Reconsidering the Equids from the Early Pleistocene Fauna of Apollonia 1 (Mygdonia Basin, Greece). Quaternary. 2021; 4(2):12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/quat4020012

Chicago/Turabian Style

Gkeme, Anastasia G., George D. Koufos, and Dimitris S. Kostopoulos. 2021. "Reconsidering the Equids from the Early Pleistocene Fauna of Apollonia 1 (Mygdonia Basin, Greece)" Quaternary 4, no. 2: 12. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/quat4020012

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop