Next Article in Journal
Exploring Liu Kang’s Paris Practice (1929–1932): Insight into Painting Materials and Technique
Previous Article in Journal
Is There Such a Thing as Hunter-Gatherer Archaeology?
Article

Revisiting the Conditions of Authenticity for Built Heritage in Areas of Conflict

1
Department of Architectural Engineering, Al Quds University, Abu-Dis, Jerusalem 90612, Palestine
2
Department of Architectural Restoration, Izmir Institute of Technology, Gülbahçe, 35430 Urla, Turkey
3
Department of Architecture, Eastern Mediterranean University, Cyprus via Mersin 10, 99628 Famagusta, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Academic Editor: Francesco Soldovieri
Received: 28 March 2021 / Revised: 6 May 2021 / Accepted: 12 May 2021 / Published: 17 May 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Conflict Heritage of the Recent Past: A Global Perspective)
This article examines the application of conditions of authenticity within the context of built heritage management in areas of political conflict, where heritage management can be seen as a political act rather than a means of protection. It focuses on values attributed to built heritage that can be targeted or reinvented by the dominant power in areas of conflict with minorities being powerless to intervene. The argument is built around the Agios Synesios Church in North Cyprus, which continued to be used by the Greek Cypriot minority following the island division in 1974. Although their way of life has been compromised, they have embraced forced change through using the church to maintain their ritual and religious practices; by doing so, they negotiate their values towards their heritage. In this case, the study shows that the conditions of authenticity are difficult to meet, given the means through which heritage management can be manipulated. Accordingly, the article aims to contribute to general discussions on the vagueness and enigmatic conditions of authenticity in areas of conflict. Different buildings in areas of conflict around the world suffer because of the political nature of heritage management, which makes the criteria of authenticity unviable. View Full-Text
Keywords: authenticity; built heritage; heritage management; conflict; Cyprus authenticity; built heritage; heritage management; conflict; Cyprus
Show Figures

Figure 1

MDPI and ACS Style

Saifi, Y.; Yüceer, H.; Hürol, Y. Revisiting the Conditions of Authenticity for Built Heritage in Areas of Conflict. Heritage 2021, 4, 811-827. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/heritage4020045

AMA Style

Saifi Y, Yüceer H, Hürol Y. Revisiting the Conditions of Authenticity for Built Heritage in Areas of Conflict. Heritage. 2021; 4(2):811-827. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/heritage4020045

Chicago/Turabian Style

Saifi, Yara, Hülya Yüceer, and Yonca Hürol. 2021. "Revisiting the Conditions of Authenticity for Built Heritage in Areas of Conflict" Heritage 4, no. 2: 811-827. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/heritage4020045

Find Other Styles

Article Access Map by Country/Region

1
Back to TopTop