Next Article in Journal
The Role of Ab-Anbars in the Vernacular Architecture of Iran with Emphasis on the Performance of Wind-Catchers in Hot and Dry Climates
Next Article in Special Issue
TEOS-PDMS-Calcium Oxalate Hydrophobic Nanocomposite for Protection and Stone Consolidation
Previous Article in Journal
Shipwrecks’ Underwater Mysteries—Identifying Commonalities Out of Globally-Distributed Knowledge
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of Ancient Mortars from Minoan City of Kommos in Crete
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Protection of Building Materials of Historical Monuments with Nanoparticle Suspensions

1
Laboratory of Transport Phenomena and Physicochemical Hydrodynamics, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece
2
FORTH/ICE-HT, Institute of Chemical Engineering Sciences, 26500 Patras, Greece
3
Laboratory of Inorganic and Analytic Chemistry, Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 26500 Patras, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 8 September 2021 / Revised: 19 October 2021 / Accepted: 25 October 2021 / Published: 27 October 2021

Abstract

:
Marble and limestone have been extensively used as building materials in historical monuments. Environmental, physical, chemical and biological factors contribute to stone deterioration. The rehabilitation of stone damage and the delay of further deterioration is of utmost importance. Inorganic nanoparticles having chemical and crystallographic affinity with building materials is very important for the formation of protective coatings or overlayers. In the present work, we have tested the possibility of treating calcitic materials with suspensions of amorphous calcium carbonate (am-CaCO3, ACC) and amorphous silica (AmSiO2). Pentelic marble (PM) was selected as the test material to validate the efficiency of the nanoparticle suspension treatment towards dissolution in undersaturated solutions and slightly acidic pH (6.50). Suspensions of ACC and AnSiO2 nanoparticles were prepared by spontaneous precipitation from supersaturated solutions and by tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS) hydrolysis, respectively. The suspensions were quite stable (nine days for ACC and months for AmSiO2). ACC and Am SiO2 particles were deposited on the surface of powdered PM. The rates of dissolution of PM were measured in solutions undersaturated with respect to calcite at a constant pH of 6.50. For specimens treated with ACC and AmSiO2 suspensions, the measured dissolution rates were significantly lower. The extent of the rate of dissolution reduction was higher for AmSiO2 particles on PM. Moreover, application of the nanoparticles on the substrate during their precipitation was most efficient method.

1. Introduction

Marble and limestone are commonly used building materials for historical monuments, especially in the countries in the Mediterranean basin. These building materials contain mainly calcite, which makes them susceptible to chemical deterioration from wet precipitation. This problem is intensified at conditions of environmental pollution in which the concentration of acid gases (SO2, NOx) is sufficiently high to render rainwater acidic [1]. The presence of microorganisms on the surface of monuments contributes to stone deterioration over time due to changes in the chemical microenvironment and coloration as well as mechanical damage. Human interventions aimed at the restoration of monuments may also lead to further destruction because of the use of improper materials or because of material mismatch [2,3]. The importance of cultural heritage calls for the development of new materials, especially for materials which can effectively repair building materials and artefacts and treat natural stone. Nanotechnology is a very important resource for these materials [4]. New materials for the remediation of damaged stones should exhibit structural affinity for the substrates. Colloid and material science have contributed significantly to art (paper, canvas, and wood) preservation over time through the use of nanostructured fluids (microemulsions and micellar solutions), chemical gels and alkaline nonaqueous nanoparticles dispersions [2]. Several attempts for the consolidation and protection of stones of historic monuments have involved the use of polymeric compounds (acrylates, alkoxysilanes). Fluorinated polymers and hybrid organic–inorganic coatings are the most promising materials in the field of monument protection [3]. Alkoxysilanes and modified silica nanoparticles are applied on stone artifacts (sandstone, marble and granite) as protective water repellent coatings [5]. Materials consisting of an ethyl silicate matrix with colloidal TiO2 and SiO2 nanoparticles were shown to be effective in stabilizing porous limestone [6]. The hybrid material consisting of SiO2 and TiO2 showed encouraging results in the protection and self-cleaning of marble [7,8]. Enhancement of hydrophobicity of stone-based monuments was reported for polymer–silica nanoparticle composite films on mineral substrates (natural marble and home made calcium carbonate blocks) [9]. Clay, SiO2, Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3 were satisfactory for the consolidation of limestone [10]. Calcium carbonate–polymer nanocomposite increased the impermeability of limestone and improve its mechanical properties [11]. Composites of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) and amorphous calcium oxalate (ACO) with alkoxysilane gels applied for the protection of monument building materials without silicates (marble, calcarenite, gypsum) resulted in the increase of surface hydrophobicity and improved resistance to acid attack [12]. Siloxane coatings with SiO2, Al2O3 SnO2 and TiO2 nanoparticles yielded superhydrophobic surfaces [13]. Barium, calcium and strontium hydroxide nanoparticles have also been used successfully for the restoration of wall paintings and in trials on sandstone and marble [14,15,16,17]. During consolidation by Ca(OH)2 particles upon exposure to atmospheric CO2, ACC formation takes place, which is subsequently converted to the thermodynamically more stable calcite [18]. Besides their crystallographic characteristics, these two calcium carbonates differ significantly in particle size (almost 1:10). The very small size of ACC particles is expected to favor penetration into the meso- and macropores of damaged stone. Amorphous silica particles suspended in water, used for the treatment of stone, penetrated inside stone matrix to a very shallow depth which increased upon suspending the particles in alcohol [19].
In the present work, CaCO3 and silica SiO2 nanoparticle suspensions were prepared from highly supersaturated solutions and from the hydrolysis of tetraortho silicate (Si(OC2H5)4,TEOS) in ethanolic solutions, respectively. Both solid particles in the respective suspensions have high crystallographic affinity for calcite. The solid particles in the suspensions were characterized by physicochemical methods (powder X-ray diffraction, XRD; measurements of their specific surface area with nitrogen adsorption according to the Brunnauer–Emmet–Teller method, BET; Fourier transformed infra-red spectroscopy, FTIR; micro-Raman, mR; and thermogravimetric analysis, TGA). The stability of the nanoparticle suspensions was assessed from the mean particle size measured with laser diffraction. The effect of the presence of the cationic surfactant hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB) on the stability of the nanoparticle suspensions was investigated. The stability of the unstable ACC and of the respective suspensions was investigated in isopropyl alcohol. The deposition of the ACC and SiO2 nanoparticles in their suspensions was carried out on powdered Pentelic marble, to maximize the surface area. Slabs of PM were ground in a ball mill to a powder with a grain size of between 600–1700 μm. The results of the treated materials with the particles were evaluated by dissolution experiments in which the rates of dissolution of the specimens were measured in undersaturated solutions of calcium carbonate (pH 6.50, 25.0 °C). Earlier work has shown that accelerated dissolution tests of powdered building materials yielded comparable results with respective dissolution experiments in which intact stone slabs were used [20]. The present work may be considered preliminary, proof-of-concept work, for the evaluation of new materials. Although ACC has been identified in conservation processes, especially with nanolime, up to the present to our knowledge, it has not been used in the form of stable suspensions, as a primary stone conservation material. Provided that the results are encouraging in the sense that they show protection of treated stone material, the work may be expanded to a second stage in order to involve blocks or test specimens of stone material, either intact or artificially deteriorated. The results in the present work are only preliminary, pointing to potential applications, and they allow for more detailed insight on the interactions of ACC and AmSiO2 particles with marble. The further task of this work is the preparation of the composite material ACC–AmSiO2, which we anticipate will be able to provide both consolidation and resistance to chemical dissolution of treated stone.

2. Experimental

ACC and SiO2 were prepared is suspensions. CaCO3 particles were prepared by precipitation from supersaturated solutions, the composition of which is summarized in Table 1.
The composition of the solutions was selected so that the solution supersaturation with respect to calcium carbonate was very high, and the solid phase anticipated to form was ACC [21,22]. Preparations 1–4 (Table 1), were done both in the absence and in the presence of cetrimonium bromide ([(C16H33)N(CH3)3]Br; cetyltrimethylammonium bromide; and hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide; CTAB) at concentrations of 1, 10 and 100 ppm. Specifically, two solutions were mixed in a batch reactor at 25 °C. The first solution was dimethyl carbonate (DMC) and sodium chloride (NaCl) and the second solution was calcium chloride (CaCl2). The two solutions upon mixing were stirred vigorously with a PTFE coated bar and a magnetic stirrer for 2.5 min. The suspension of calcium carbonate solid particles was filtered under vacuum with membrane filters (cellulose nitrate 0.2 μm), and the solid on the filters was rinsed with acetone and freeze dried. The solid, was identified by XRD and the morphology and particle size distribution was assessed from pictures obtained with scanning electron microscopy, SEM. The solid phase was further characterized with Fourier Transformed InfraRed Sepctroscopy (FTIR), micro Raman spectroscopy (mR) and Thermo-Gravimetric Analysis (TGA). The respective specific surface area was measured by the Brunnauer, Emmet, Teller (BET) nitrogen absorption method. Extended absorption isotherm measurements were used for the calculation of porosity. In the case of powdered PM, dried material was used. For the PM samples treated with the suspensions, the samples were separated from the suspensions by filtration, washed with triply distilled water and dried overnight at 60 °C. Silicon oxide nanoparticles were prepared by hydrolysis of TEOS [23]. Ethanol (C2H5OH, 95% in water) and ammonia (NH3, 32%) solutions were added in a batch reactor and were stirred with a magnetic stirrer for 30 min. Next, the appropriate amount of TEOS was added and stirring was continued for an additional hour. In the silica precipitation in the presence of CTAB, the latter was added in an ethanol–ammonia solution. The solid formed by hydrolysis was characterized by XRD and the morphology was investigated by SEM. The stability of the silica suspensions in the absence and in the presence of CTAB was monitored as a function of time from measurements of the particle size distribution (PSD) in the suspensions. The silica particles that were formed were treated in an ultrasonic bath for 1, 2, 5 and 7 min. The suspended particles were separated from the suspensions, filtered through membrane filters (0.1 μm) and analyzed by thermogravimetric analysis (TGA).
Powdered Pentelic marble (PM) was used as a model system for CaCO3 and SiO2 nanoparticle deposition, to test the effect of application of the suspensions of particles prepared on its protection from dissolution in acidic undersaturated solutions. PM from slabs was ground in a ball mill, until a powder of particles with sizes (equivalent sphere diameter) between 500–1500 μm was obtained. Each of these particles contained a large number marble grains consisting of calcite crystals, separated in their boundaries, consisting of silica minerals. These granulated PM particles provide a reasonable representation of flat marble surfaces from the point of view of chemical and mineralogical composition, while exhibiting on the other hand a sufficiently large surface area to observe and monitor surface-controlled processes such as dissolution in undersaturated solutions. Two methods for the deposition of ACC nanoparticles on PM were applied: According to the first method (method CCA), the powdered PM was suspended in the DMC and CaCl2 solution mixture. The suspension of PM powder was thoroughly mixed until it was homogeneous, and next, the appropriate sodium hydroxide solution was added to make the suspension alkaline (pH Ca.10) and thus initiate hydrolysis of DMC, which resulted in the precipitation of ACC. In the second method (method CCB), the powdered PM was introduced in the solutions mixture immediately past the onset of formation of ACC. From the practical point of view, both methods represented situations in which a suspension of ACC was deposited on the surface of PM, but they differed in the timing of deposition: in CCA, deposits were formed in situ during precipitation on the substrate, and in CCB, a suspension of ACC particles interacted with the substrate. Amorphous SiO2 particles (AmSiO2) were prepared by hydrolysis of TEOS (0.29 M) in ammonia solution, (0.67 M) in 95% ethanol solutions at 25 °C. The duration of the hydrolysis process was 180 min. AmSiO2 suspensions were also prepared at the same conditions, in the presence of 1, 5 and 10 ppm of CTAB in the hydrolysis medium. The deposition of amorphous SiO2 nanoparticles was also done with two methods: AmSiA, in which powdered PM was suspended in the ethanol–ammonia mixture followed by the introduction and subsequent hydrolysis of TEOS, and AmSiB, in which the powdered PM was added after the initiation of the rapid hydrolysis of TEOS. The solids at the end of the synthesis were separated from the liquid by filtration and were characterized by XRD and measurements of their specific surface area (BET). The morphology of the preparations was studied by SEM.
The PM dissolution (treated and untreated) was studied in solutions undersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate. Undersaturated solutions were prepared directly in a batch reactor thermostatic at 25.0 ± 0.1 °C with circulating water. The solutions were prepared by mixing CaCl2·2H2O and NaHCO3 solutions (final solutions concentrations 1.25 mM) and pH was adjusted to 6.50. The ionic strength of the solutions was adjusted to 0.15 M with the addition of stock NaCl solution as needed. Following pH adjustment by the addition of standard hydrochloric acid solution, accurately weighted test solid was introduced into the undersaturated solutions. The solutions’ pH increased as a result of the dissolution of calcium carbonate:
H2O + CaCO3 ↔ Ca2+ + HCO3 + OH
Changes in the solution pH as small as 0.01 pH units triggered the addition of standard HCl solution (0.01 M) from the precision syringe of a computer-controlled pH stat system. The dissolution process was thus measured at a constant pH until the solution undersaturation decreased sufficiently to stop additions, due to the pH reaching a point where it was practically unchanged. Samples were withdrawn and filtered through membrane filters. The filtrates were analyzed for total calcium by atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS, Perkin Elmer AAnalyst 300) and for dissolved silicates spectrophotometrically (Perkin Elmer lambda 35) as needed. The experimental set-up for the dissolution tests is shown in Figure 1.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. CaCO3 Particles/Suspensions

Calcium carbonate, in preparations 1–4 of Table 1 (in the absence and in the presence of CTAB) yielded calcite and vaterite and small amounts of ACC. The presence of ACC was a clear indication of the formation of ACC and its subsequent transformation to vaterite, and to the most stable calcite. In the absence of CTAB, the crystalline phases identified in the precipitate were vaterite and portlandite (Figure 2a). At all test conditions, calcium hydroxide (portlandite) precipitated as well from the supersaturated solutions because of the high initial pH of the solutions (>10), as may be seen in the XRD profiles shown in Figure 2b. It is interesting to note that portlandite was stable for a long time, although it is reported that the carbonation reaction of calcium carbonate is quite fast [18,23]. Perhaps the stabilization towards carbonization is due to the substrate or to the presence of the other mineral phases. Specifically, in the absence and in the presence of low CTAB (1 ppm) concentrations, vaterite precipitated together with ACC, showing that the presence of the cationic surfactant slowed to some extent the conversion of ACC to vaterite. At higher concentrations of the test cationic surfactant (10, 100 ppm) calcite was also found, clearly coming from the conversion of the less stable vaterite.
In the SEM photographs (Figure 3), vaterite particles may be seen (mean diameter 1.0–1.5 μm) both in the absence and in the presence of CTAB. The very small vaterite particle size showed that this phase was formed by conversion of the initially formed ACC. In the presence of the cationic surfactant other than vaterite, ACC nanoparticles were also to a significant extent converting to vaterite (Figure 3b–d). In Figure 3a, as may be seen, the precipitate consists of ca. 100 nm ACC particles agglomerated to vaterite converting to calcite (developing crystal faces typical of calcite).
The IR spectra of the precipitates are shown in Figure 4. The characteristic band at 745 cm−1, corresponding to vaterite, was present in all precipitates [24]. The band at 1074 cm−1 of the solid precipitated in the presence of CTAB corresponds to ACC [25]. In the absence of the cationic surfactant, the band of the precipitated solid at 848 cm−1 corresponded to calcite. The strong band at 713 cm−1, corresponding to calcite [24], was found in all precipitated solids. The absorption bands at 1087 cm−1 suggested the presence of ACC, in the form of precursor to calcite and vaterite polymorphic phases [25]. The broad band at 2700–3600 cm−1 is suggested to correspond to the water content of ACC. The bands at 2352 and 3642 cm−1 suggested the presence of portlandite [26,27,28,29,30].
The Raman spectra, shown in Figure 5, revealed the characteristic peaks of calcite and vaterite. The peak at 1085 cm−1 is characteristic for ACC, corresponding to the ν1 vibration [25]. Calcite was identified in the precipitates formed in the presence of higher CTAB concentrations (10, 100 ppm) from the peaks at 155 cm−1, 282 cm−1, and 711 cm−1, which belong to lattice modes. The doublets of the vibration modes 1075–1090 cm−1 (v1; all precipitates except of the precipitate formed in the presence of 10 ppm CTAB) and 740–750 cm−1 (v4) confirmed the presence of vaterite. Strong peaks at 105, 114, 267, 300 cm−1 correspond, also, to vaterite (formed both in the absence and in the presence of 1 ppm CTAB). The presence of aragonite was identified at 206 cm−1, both in the absence and in the presence of 1 ppm CTAB and in higher concentrations (10, 100 ppm) at 155 cm−1 [31,32]. Finally, portlandite was identified in all preparations at 350 cm−1, while absence of CTAB showed an extra band at 350 cm−1 [33]. Thermogravimetric analysis results of the precipitates are shown in Figure 6. The first weight reduction (85–110 °C) is due to the removal of naturally absorbed water. At the temperature range of 400–450 °C, the weight difference is due to the combustion of the organic part of the precipitate, resulting from the hydrolysis of DMC during the synthesis of CaCO3. The final weight loss was observed at 650–700 °C and was due to the removal of carbon dioxide during the conversion of calcium carbonate to calcium oxide at this temperature range.
The formation of ACC nanoparticles by precipitation in the conditions used for preparation 5 (Table 1), was confirmed by the XRD profile shown in Figure 7a. As may be seen both from the lack of sharp reflections and from the low counts number, the respective solids were predominantly amorphous. The morphology of the precipitated solid, as may be seen from SEM photographs, showed the formation of spherical particles, with sizes of about 300 nm (Figure 7b). The BET specific surface area of the precipitate was measured and was found to be equal to 4.7 m2·g−1.
An important property of nanomaterials is their high specific surface area in comparison with the respective area of the macroscopic material. Their application therefore implies a drastically larger interaction surface with the environment. The application of suspended nanoparticles on stone, from a practical point of view, is often done by brushes or by spray applications. In the present work, the application of suspended particles was done by suspending the powdered PM, which presents the advantage of increasing the surface area of interaction, while on the other hand, the advantage of simulation of the macroscopic size of treated stone is preserved. Each of the grains of the PM powder consists of particles which make up a miniature of the stone surface. Undoubtedly, further development is needed before going on to conservation practice, to ensure effective penetration of the suspension to the deteriorated parts of the stone. The main task of the present work was to prove a significant increase in the resistance of the treated stone material to dissolution caused by wet precipitation. ACC suspended in water is shown to transform in rather short times in aqueous media [18]. To extend further the stability of the suspended solid phase, ACC particles, after their separation from the mother liquor by freeze drying, were suspended in isopropyl alcohol. The stability of the suspensions was monitored for two weeks; the morphology and particle size were checked from a number of SEM photographs, as may be seen in Figure 8; their suspension into the solvent resulted in their stability in the form of ACC with sizes lower than 500 nm for nine days. Their transformation into calcite took place during the following days. Specifically, over the first nine days (Figure 8a–d), the spherical nanoparticles were seen exclusively without significant changes in size. Past this time, the morphology of the particles started to change, showing conversion to rhombohedral calcite, although the size changes were not significant.
From the results shown so far, it may be concluded that the formation of ACC is feasible and that stable suspensions can be prepared in isopropyl alcohol. It should be noted that the dry ACC powder, preserved at −24 °C, did not show any changes in particle size, shape and crystallinity for time periods of at least eight months. It is therefore possible to keep ACC intact and make the suspensions needed for the treatment of calcareous stones.

3.2. Suspensions of Amorphous SiO2 Particles

The particle size distribution of the AmSiO2 preparations described in the experimental section was monitored as a function of time. The stability of the AmSiO2 suspensions treated by sonication for time periods up to 7 min was examined. The mean particle size of the AmSiO2 suspensions was stable, at about 150–200 nm for a period of one month. Ultrasonic treatment over short time periods did not show any changes. However, ultrasonic treatment of the suspensions for longer times (5 and 7 min) caused the agglomeration of the suspended particles, as shown in Figure 9, in which the mean size of the suspensions treated for different duration times is shown as a function of time.
The preparation obtained in the presence of low concentrations (1, 5 ppm) of CTAB consisted of particles with mean sizes of about 200 nm. In the presence of higher concentrations of CTAB (10 ppm), the mean particle size increased, as may be seen in Figure 10. It may be suggested that the apparent aggregation was due to the adsorption of the cationic surfactant adsorption on the negatively charged (in alkaline pH suspensions) SiO2 particles, which resulted in at least partial charge neutralization of their surface charge. As may be seen, the presence of 1 ppm CTAB did not have any significant effect, 5 ppm resulted in increases in the mean size by almost 50%, and the presence of 10 ppm CTAB yielded aggregated particles with a mean size of three times the respective size seen in the absence of CTAB. The concentration-dependent mean size increase is evidence of the respective surface charge neutralization.
The results of the XRD analysis (Figure 11) of the silica precipitates confirmed that the solids were amorphous to X-rays, both in the absence and in the presence of CTAB—which, as shown, did not affect the crystallinity of the precipitate. The entire XRD pattern did not show any reflection corresponding to crystalline materials, the total number of counts (intensity) of the diffracted X-rays was very low, and the pattern was typical for substances amorphous to X-rays. The morphology and particle size of the amorphous silica nanoparticles prepared by TEOS hydrolysis in the absence of CTAB are shown in the SEM pictures in Figure 12. The mean particle size was 100 nm and the preparation had a narrow size distribution. The larger mean particle size and the rather broad particle size distribution of the preparations in the mother liquor apparently correspond to the formation of agglomerates which are stable over long time periods.
The results of the thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) for the AmSiO2 nanoparticles prepared both in the absence and in the presence of CTAB are shown in Figure 13. The weight loss in the range of 100 to 300 °C observed was due to the residual organic part of TEOS (TEOH) after hydrolysis. No difference between solids prepared in the absence and in the presence of CTAB was observed.

3.3. Deposition of Nanoparticles in Pentelic Marble and Dissolution of Specimens (without and with Treatment with Suspensions)

The dissolution process takes place on the surface of the test specimens. In the present work, based on earlier work and in agreement with literature reports, it was assumed that at pH 6.50 dissolution is mainly controlled by surface diffusion of the crystal building units (possibly different from the crystal unit cell) on the surface of the crystals. The characteristic properties of the specimen surfaces are therefore very important for the kinetics of dissolution. In Table 2, the specific surface area and pore volume of powdered Pentelic marble and of the materials, resulting from the deposition of ACC and AmSiO2 nanoparticles, are summarized.
As shown in Table 2, treatment of the PM surface with ACC nanoparticles reduced the specific surface area (SSA) and pore volume. This reduction suggested strong interactions between ACC and marble particles, which resulted in sealing of the larger pores. As may be seen, ACC particles adhering on marble irrespective of the method of application was ca. 3% w/w. Coating of PM grains with ACC nanoparticles is shown in the SEM pictures in Figure 14a,b, in which a rather thick layer of ACC has been formed. SiO2 nanoparticles interacted to a larger extent with PM grains in suspension, as may be seen from the mass of silica retained on PM grains (ca. 14% w/w). The SSA of the solid increased to an extent that confirmed that the PM grain–AmSiO2 composite was not just a mechanical mixture (a mechanical mixture of two components would be expected to yield an SSA ca. 11 m2·g−1). The concomitant increase of the pore volume of the composite material suggested that the deposition of the amorphous silica particles was done in “fluffy” layers, allowing for larger pores in the composite materials. In this sense, the deposition method AmSiB corresponded to a more compact deposition, even though the weight percent deposit was the same as with AmSiA.
The morphology of the PM grains covered by ACC and AmSiO2 particles is shown in the SEM images of Figure 14.
The dissolution rates of all materials (PM grains, PM with ACC (methods CCA and CCB) and PM with SiO2 (methods AmSiA and AmSiB) were measured in solutions undersaturated with respect to calcite (thermodynamically the most stable calcium carbonate phase, which is the main chemical component of PM). The relative undersaturation, σ, of the solutions is defined as:
σ = 1 Ω 1 2
where
Ω = ( C a 2 + ) ( C O 3 2 ) K s 0
In Equation (3), in the numerator is the product of the respective activities of the ions in the solution and K s 0 is the thermodynamic solubility constant for calcite. The maximum value of Ω is 1 (saturated solution), where σ = 0. The experimental conditions for dissolution are summarized in Table 3:
The dissolution rate of the PM with ACC deposited with both methods yielded rates of dissolution close to those corresponding to PM. The ACC coating is expected to dissolve faster in comparison to PM because of its higher solubility (Figure 15).
As may be seen in Figure 15, the rates and the overall dissolution of PM was reduced with treatments of deposition of ACC with methods CCA and CCB. The former method, in which precipitation of ACC was induced in the solution in the presence of DMC was more efficient, apparently due to stronger interactions with the PM grains. It is interesting that the application of ACC on the PM, irrespective of the method of application, reduced the rate of dissolution, despite the fact that ACC is more soluble than the calcite—as may be also seen from the dissolutions kinetics of the model compound (calcite).
Amorphous silica deposits on PM grains by the two methods (AmSiA and AmSiB), resulted in the slowing of the dissolution of PM, as may be seen in Figure 16.
The deposits of amorphous silica were quite efficient in reducing the rates of dissolution of PM in acidic aqueous media, especially when applied in the same way as ACC, i.e., when the coating is applied by precipitation in a suspension of the underlying material (method AmSiA).

4. Conclusions

Suspensions of ACC were successfully synthesized by the hydrolysis of DMC in the presence of calcium chloride solutions at very alkaline conditions. The stability of the suspensions in the mother liquor depends on the composition of the solutions from which it precipitates out. Stable ACC suspensions were obtained from solutions in which DMC concentration was 50mM, CaCl2 10 mM and NaOH 100 mM. Higher concentrations yielded precipitates in which vaterite and portlandite dominated the solid phase. The ACC obtained by separation from the mother liquor was quite stable in the solid form at −24 °C, and suspensions in isopropanol were stable at least for 9 days. In the presence of 1, 10 and 100 ppm of the cationic surfactant CTAB, the stability of the suspensions was not favored and the less stable vaterite was converted into calcite. ACC suspensions were applied successfully on finely comminuted PM.
Amorphous silica suspensions were prepared by TEOS hydrolysis. These suspensions consisted of fairly monodispersed silica particles with sizes of 100 nm. The mean particle size measured by laser diffraction was larger, suggesting aggregation. The formation of aggregates was intensified in the presence of the cationic surfactant CTAB.
The most effective method of application of ACC and AmSiO2 on PM was found to be the formation of the two types of nanoparticles in suspensions of PM grains. This process is equivalent to brushing or spraying surfaces with the suspensions. The deposition of both ACC and AmSiO2 on PM resulted in a significant reduction of the respective rates of dissolution in solutions undersaturated with respect to calcium carbonate at pH 6.50.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, P.G.K., C.A.P., E.I.P.; methodology, E.I.P., P.G.K.; validation, T.G.T., C.L., E.Z.; formal analysis, E.I.P., T.G.T., C.L., E.Z.; investigation, E.I.P., T.G.T., C.L., E.Z.; resources, P.G.K., C.A.P.; data curation, A.G.A., T.G.T.; writing—original draft preparation, E.I.P., P.G.K., C.A.P.; visualization, E.I.P., P.G.K., C.A.P.; supervision, P.G.K., C.A.P.; project administration, P.G.K., C.A.P.; funding acquisition, P.G.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Western Greece Region, ESPA Programme of Regional Development, Program KRHPIS II, Action POLITEIA II, grant number MIS 5002478.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The Study did not include report data included in publicly open databases.

Acknowledgments

Part of this work was carried out as part of the research project «Aνάπτυξη νέων υλικών για τη συντήρηση διαβρωμένων ασβεστολιθικών δομικών στοιχείων» στο πλαίσιο της πράξης με τίτλο «Πολιτισμός ΤΕχνολογΙA: Νέες Τεχνολογίες στην Έρευνα, Μελέτη, Τεκμηρίωση και Πρόσβαση στην Πληροφορία Aντικειμένων Πολιτισμικής Κληρονομιάς και Μνημείων (ΠOΛΙΤΕΙA-ΙΙ)» με Κωδικό OΠΣ 5002478; Part of this work was financially supported by the Stavros Niarchos Foundation within the framework of the project ARCHERS; Laboratory of Instrumental Pharmaceutical Analysis, Department of Pharmacy, University of Patras, is acknowledged for the micro Raman spectroscopy characterizations.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Spathis, P.; Triantafyllidis, K.; Prochaska, C.; Karapanagiotis, I.; Pavlidou, E.; Stefanidou, M. Characterization and properties of silicate and nanocomposite coatings for the protection of dolomite marble against weathering. In International Symposium on the Conservation of Monuments in the Mediterranean Basin; Springer: Cham, Switzerland, 2018; pp. 287–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Baglioni, P.; Chelazzi, D.; Giorgi, R.; Poggi, G. Colloid and materials science for the conservation of cultural heritage: Cleaning, consolidation, and deacidification. Langmuir 2013, 29, 5110–5122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Sadat-Shojai, M.; Ershad-Langroudi, A. Polymeric coatings for protection of historic monuments: Opportunities and chal-lenges. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2009, 112, 2535–2551. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Baglioni, P.; Carretti, E.; Chelazzi, D. Nanomaterials in art conservation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2015, 10, 287–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. De Ferri, L.; Lottici, P.P.; Lorenzi, A.; Montenero, A.; Salvioli-Mariani, E. Study of silica nanoparticles—Polysiloxane hydrophobic treatments for stone-based monument protection. J. C. Herit. 2011, 12, 356–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ksinopoulou, E.; Bakolas, A.; Moropoulou, A. Modification of Si-based consolidants by the addition of colloidal nanopar-ticles: Application in porous stones. J. Nano Res. 2014, 27, 143–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kapridaki, C.; Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P. TiO2–SiO2–PDMS nano-composite hydrophobic coating with self-cleaning properties for marble protection. Prog. Org. Coat. 2013, 76, 400–410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kapridaki, C.; Maravelaki-Kalaitzaki, P. TiO2-SiO2-PDMS nanocomposites with self-cleaning properties for stone protection and consolidation. Geol. Soc. Lond. Spec. Publ. 2015, 416, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Manoudis, P.; Papadopoulou, S.; Karapanagiotis, I.; Tsakalof, A.; Zuburtikudis, I.; Panayiotou, C. Polymer-silica nanoparticles composite films as protective coatings for stone-based monuments. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2007, 61, 1361–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Aldoasri, M.A.; Darwish, S.; Adam, M.; Elmarzugi, N.; Ahmed, S. Performance of Clay, SiO2, Ca(OH)2 and CaCO3-polymeric nanocomposites for conservation and preservation of limestone artworks. Preprints 2018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Aldoasri, M.A.; Darwish, S.S.; Adam, M.A.; Elmarzugi, N.A.; Ahmed, S.M. Enhancing the durability of calcareous stone monuments of Ancient Egypt using CaCO3 nanoparticles. Sustainability 2017, 9, 1392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Burgos-Cara, A.; Rodríguez-Navarro, C.; Ortega-Huertas, M.; Ruiz-Agudo, E. Bioinspired alkoxysilane conservation treatments for building materials based on amorphous calcium carbonate and oxalate nanoparticles. ACS Appl. Nano Mater. 2019, 2, 4954–4967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Manoudis, P.N.; Karapanagiotis, I.; Tsakalof, A.; Zuburtikudis, I.; Kolinkeová, B.; Panayiotou, C. Superhydrophobic films for the protection of outdoor cultural heritage assets. Appl. Phys. A 2009, 97, 351–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Giorgi, R.; Ambrosi, M.; Toccafondi, N.; Baglioni, P. Nanoparticles for cultural heritage conservation: Calcium and bariumhydroxide nanoparticles for wall painting consolidation. Chem. Eur. J. 2010, 16, 9374–9382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Baglioni, M.; Poggi, G.; Chelazzi, D.; Baglioni, P. Advanced materials in cultural heritage conservation. Molecules 2021, 26, 3967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Rodriguez-Navarro, C.; Ruiz-Agudo, E. Nanolimes: From synthesis to application. Pure Appl. Chem. 2018, 90, 523–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Dei, L.; Salvadori, B. Nanotechnology in cultural heritage conservation: Nanometric slaked lime saves architectonic and artistic surfaces from decay. J. C. Herit. 2006, 7, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Rodriguez-Navarro, C.; Kudłacz, K.; Cizer, O.; Ruiz-Agudo, E. Formation of amorphous calcium carbonate and its transformation into mesostructured calcite. CrystEngComm. 2015, 17, 58–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sierra-Fernandez, A.; Gomez-Villalba, L.S.; Rabanal, M.E.; Fort, R. New nanomaterials for applications in conservation and res-toration of stony materials: A review. Mater. Constr. 2017, 67, 3–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Kanellopoulou, D.G. Physico-Chemical Investigation of the Deterioration of Building Materials of Historic Monuments and Protection Methods. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Patras, Patra, Greece, 2012; p. 151. [Google Scholar]
  21. Koga, N.; Nakagoe, Y.; Tanaka, H. Crystallization of amorphous calcium carbonate. Thermochim. Acta 1998, 318, 239–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Faatz, M.; Gröhn, F.; Wegner, G. Amorphous calcium carbonate: Synthesis and potential intermediate in biomineralization. Adv. Mater. 2004, 16, 996–1000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Singh, T.K.; Jain, C.L.; Sharma, S.K.; Singh, S.S. Preparation of dispersed silica by hydrolysis of tetraethyl orthosilicate. Indian J. Eng. Mater. Sci. 1999, 6, 349–351. [Google Scholar]
  24. Vagenas, N.V.; Gatsouli, A.; Kontoyannis, C.G. Quantitative analysis of synthetic calcium carbonate polymorphs using FT-IR spectroscopy. Talanta 2003, 59, 831–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Khouzani, M.F.; Chevrier, D.M.; Güttlein, P.; Hauser, K.; Zhang, P.; Hedinc, N.; Gebauer, D. Disordered amorphous calcium carbonate from direct precipitation. CrystEngComm. 2015, 17, 4842–4849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chakrabarty, D.; Mahapatra, S. Aragonite crystals with unconventional morphologies. J. Mater. Chem. 1999, 9, 2953–2957. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xyla, A.G.; Koutsoukos, P.G. Quantitative analysis of calcium carbonate polymorphs by infrared spectroscopy. J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1 Phys. Chem. Condens. Phases 1989, 85, 3165–3172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Rodriguez-Blanco, J.D.; Shaw, S.; Benning, L.G. The kinetics and mechanisms of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) crys-tallization to calcite, viavaterite. Nanoscale 2011, 3, 265–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  29. Siva, T.; Muralidharan, S.; Sathiyanarayanan, S.; Manikandan, E.; Jayachandran, M. Enhanced polymer induced precipitation of polymorphous in calcium carbonate: Calcite aragonite vaterite phases. J. Inorg. Organomet. Polym. Mater. 2017, 27, 770–778. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Khachani, M.; El Hamidi, A.; Halim, M.; Arsalane, S. Non-isothermal kinetic and thermodynamic studies of the dehydroxylation process of synthetic calcium hydroxide Ca(OH)2. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2014, 5, 615–624. [Google Scholar]
  31. Nehrke, G.; Poigner, H.; Wilhelms-Dick, D.; Brey, T.; Abele, D. Coexistence of three calcium carbonate polymorphs in the shell of the Antarctic clam Laternula elliptica. Geochem. Geophys. Geosyst. 2012, 13, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Behrens, G.; Kuhn, L.T.; Ubic, R.; Heuer, A.H. Raman spectra of vateritic calcium carbonate. Spectrosc. Lett. 1995, 28, 983–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rodriguez-Navarro, C.; Elert, K.; Ševčík, R. Amorphous and crystalline calcium carbonate phases during carbonation of nanolimes: Implications in heritage conservation. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 6594–6607. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Experimental set-up for the measurement of dissolution of calcitic materials at constant pH.
Figure 1. Experimental set-up for the measurement of dissolution of calcitic materials at constant pH.
Heritage 04 00218 g001
Figure 2. Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of CaCO3 precipitates in the absence (a) and in the presence of CTAB (b).
Figure 2. Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of CaCO3 precipitates in the absence (a) and in the presence of CTAB (b).
Heritage 04 00218 g002
Figure 3. CaCO3 particles precipitated according to conditions summarized in Table 1: (a) in the absence of CTAB, Bar 1 μm; (b) 1 ppm CTAB, Bar 2 μm; (c) 10 ppm, Bar 200 nm; (d) 100 ppm CTAB, Bar 2 μm.
Figure 3. CaCO3 particles precipitated according to conditions summarized in Table 1: (a) in the absence of CTAB, Bar 1 μm; (b) 1 ppm CTAB, Bar 2 μm; (c) 10 ppm, Bar 200 nm; (d) 100 ppm CTAB, Bar 2 μm.
Heritage 04 00218 g003
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of the precipitate formed: (a) in the absence of CTAB; and in the presence of (b) 1 ppm CTAB; (c) 10 ppm CTAB; (d) 100 ppm CTAB.
Figure 4. FTIR spectra of the precipitate formed: (a) in the absence of CTAB; and in the presence of (b) 1 ppm CTAB; (c) 10 ppm CTAB; (d) 100 ppm CTAB.
Heritage 04 00218 g004
Figure 5. Micro-Raman spectra of CaCO3 precipitates formed: (a) in the absence of CTAB; and in the presence of (b) 1 ppm CTAB; (c) 10 ppm CTAB; (d) 100 ppm CTAB.
Figure 5. Micro-Raman spectra of CaCO3 precipitates formed: (a) in the absence of CTAB; and in the presence of (b) 1 ppm CTAB; (c) 10 ppm CTAB; (d) 100 ppm CTAB.
Heritage 04 00218 g005
Figure 6. TGA analysis profiles of CaCO3 precipitates: (a) in the absence of CTAB (black line); and in the presence of (b) 1 ppm CTAB; (c) 10 ppm; (d) 100 ppm CTAB.
Figure 6. TGA analysis profiles of CaCO3 precipitates: (a) in the absence of CTAB (black line); and in the presence of (b) 1 ppm CTAB; (c) 10 ppm; (d) 100 ppm CTAB.
Heritage 04 00218 g006
Figure 7. (a) Powder X-ray diffraction pattern; (b) SEM photographs of ACC particles formed at the conditions of preparation 5 (Table 1); Bar 1 μm.
Figure 7. (a) Powder X-ray diffraction pattern; (b) SEM photographs of ACC particles formed at the conditions of preparation 5 (Table 1); Bar 1 μm.
Heritage 04 00218 g007
Figure 8. CaCO3 suspensions in isopropyl alcohol. Evolution of crystal shape and size past: (a) 1 day (bar 1 μm), (b) 6 days (bar 1 μm), (c) 8 days (bar 2 μm), (d) 9 days (bar 2 μm), (e) 13 days (bar 1 μm), (f) 14 days (bar 1 μm).
Figure 8. CaCO3 suspensions in isopropyl alcohol. Evolution of crystal shape and size past: (a) 1 day (bar 1 μm), (b) 6 days (bar 1 μm), (c) 8 days (bar 2 μm), (d) 9 days (bar 2 μm), (e) 13 days (bar 1 μm), (f) 14 days (bar 1 μm).
Heritage 04 00218 g008
Figure 9. Mean particle diameter of AmSiO2 suspensions in the mother liquor, in the absence of CTAB as function of time, using ultrasonic treatment for 1, 2, 5, and 7 min.
Figure 9. Mean particle diameter of AmSiO2 suspensions in the mother liquor, in the absence of CTAB as function of time, using ultrasonic treatment for 1, 2, 5, and 7 min.
Heritage 04 00218 g009
Figure 10. Mean particle diameter of AmSiO2 particles suspended in water, as a function of time in the presence of the cationic surfactant CTAB.
Figure 10. Mean particle diameter of AmSiO2 particles suspended in water, as a function of time in the presence of the cationic surfactant CTAB.
Heritage 04 00218 g010
Figure 11. Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of SiO2 particles precipitated by TEOS hydrolysis in the absence and in the presence of CTAB.
Figure 11. Powder X-ray diffraction pattern of SiO2 particles precipitated by TEOS hydrolysis in the absence and in the presence of CTAB.
Heritage 04 00218 g011
Figure 12. SEM picture of AmSiO2 nanoparticles prepared by the hydrolysis of TEOS in the absence of CTAB (Bar 100 nm).
Figure 12. SEM picture of AmSiO2 nanoparticles prepared by the hydrolysis of TEOS in the absence of CTAB (Bar 100 nm).
Heritage 04 00218 g012
Figure 13. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of AmSiO2 nanoparticles prepared by TEOS hydrolysis in the absence and in the presence of the cationic surfactant CTAB.
Figure 13. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) of AmSiO2 nanoparticles prepared by TEOS hydrolysis in the absence and in the presence of the cationic surfactant CTAB.
Heritage 04 00218 g013
Figure 14. Surface coverage of PM grains by ACC: (a) ACC deposition, method CCA (bar 1 μm); (b) ACC deposition, method CCB (bar 200 nm); (c) Amorphous SiO2 deposition method AmSiA (bar 200 nm); (d) Amorphous SiO2 deposition method AmSiB (bar 1 μm).
Figure 14. Surface coverage of PM grains by ACC: (a) ACC deposition, method CCA (bar 1 μm); (b) ACC deposition, method CCB (bar 200 nm); (c) Amorphous SiO2 deposition method AmSiA (bar 200 nm); (d) Amorphous SiO2 deposition method AmSiB (bar 1 μm).
Heritage 04 00218 g014
Figure 15. Dissolution of PM in undersaturated calcium carbonate solutions (σ = 0.89), 25 °C, pH 6.50, 0.15 M NaCl; (■) PM untreated; ( Heritage 04 00218 i001) PM with ACC deposits, method CCA; ( Heritage 04 00218 i002) PM with ACC deposits, method CCB; ( Heritage 04 00218 i003) calcite powder.
Figure 15. Dissolution of PM in undersaturated calcium carbonate solutions (σ = 0.89), 25 °C, pH 6.50, 0.15 M NaCl; (■) PM untreated; ( Heritage 04 00218 i001) PM with ACC deposits, method CCA; ( Heritage 04 00218 i002) PM with ACC deposits, method CCB; ( Heritage 04 00218 i003) calcite powder.
Heritage 04 00218 g015
Figure 16. Dissolution of PM in undersaturated calcium carbonate solutions (σ = 0.89), 25 °C, pH 6.50, 0.15 M NaCl; (■) PM untreated; ( Heritage 04 00218 i001) PM with AmSiO2 deposits, method AmSiA; ( Heritage 04 00218 i002) PM with AmSiO2 deposits, method AmSiB.
Figure 16. Dissolution of PM in undersaturated calcium carbonate solutions (σ = 0.89), 25 °C, pH 6.50, 0.15 M NaCl; (■) PM untreated; ( Heritage 04 00218 i001) PM with AmSiO2 deposits, method AmSiA; ( Heritage 04 00218 i002) PM with AmSiO2 deposits, method AmSiB.
Heritage 04 00218 g016
Table 1. Experimental conditions for the synthesis of ACC suspensions. 25 °C; Total duration of precipitation before the separation of the solids from mother liquor: 150 s.
Table 1. Experimental conditions for the synthesis of ACC suspensions. 25 °C; Total duration of precipitation before the separation of the solids from mother liquor: 150 s.
Parameter/Preparation12345
Concentration of DMC (M)0.10.10.10.10.05
Concentration of CaCl2·2H2O (M)0.050.050.050.050.01
Concentration of ΝaOH (M)0.30.30.30.30.1
Concentration of CTAB (ppm)-110100-
Table 2. Specific surface area (BET), pore volume (calculated from the BET isotherm) and amount of solid deposited on the powdered Pentelic marble.
Table 2. Specific surface area (BET), pore volume (calculated from the BET isotherm) and amount of solid deposited on the powdered Pentelic marble.
MaterialBET Specific Surface Area
(m2/g)
Pore Volume
(cm3/g)
% w/w CaCO3/SiO2
in Material
Powdered Pentelic marble8.40.029
CaCO3 (ACC)4.70.006
CCA method of CaCO3 deposition 7.80.0122.9
CCB method of CaCO3 deposition7.90.0152.8
AmSiO232.50.103
AmSiA method of SiO2 deposition 23.70.11013.9
AmSiB method of SiO2 deposition22.00.06513.7
Table 3. Composition and dissolution rates of marble using CaCO3/SiO2 nanoparticles.
Table 3. Composition and dissolution rates of marble using CaCO3/SiO2 nanoparticles.
MaterialRelative Undersaturation, σDissolution Rate of
CaCO3
/×10−8 mol·m−2·s−1
Powdered PM0.891.4
CaCO3 (ACC)3.4
CCA1.3
CCB2.0
AmSiO2N/A
AmSiA0.3
AmSiB0.4
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pavlakou, E.I.; Agrafiotis, A.G.; Tsolaki, T.G.; Lemonia, C.; Zouvani, E.; Paraskeva, C.A.; Koutsoukos, P.G. The Protection of Building Materials of Historical Monuments with Nanoparticle Suspensions. Heritage 2021, 4, 3970-3986. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/heritage4040218

AMA Style

Pavlakou EI, Agrafiotis AG, Tsolaki TG, Lemonia C, Zouvani E, Paraskeva CA, Koutsoukos PG. The Protection of Building Materials of Historical Monuments with Nanoparticle Suspensions. Heritage. 2021; 4(4):3970-3986. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/heritage4040218

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pavlakou, Efstathia I., Anastasios G. Agrafiotis, Theokleiti G. Tsolaki, Christine Lemonia, Emily Zouvani, Christakis A. Paraskeva, and Petros G. Koutsoukos. 2021. "The Protection of Building Materials of Historical Monuments with Nanoparticle Suspensions" Heritage 4, no. 4: 3970-3986. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/heritage4040218

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop