Next Article in Journal
Research Progress of Minimal Tillage Method and Machine in China
Next Article in Special Issue
Innovative Vibrating Hydraulic Dredge for Striped Venus (Chamelea gallina) Fishing
Previous Article in Journal
Brief Review of Minimum or No-Till Seeders in China
Previous Article in Special Issue
From Conventional to Precision Fertilization: A Case Study on the Transition for a Small-Medium Farm
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of a Lab-Scale Prototype for Validating an Innovative Pitting Method of Oil Olives

by
Pietro Toscano
1,*,
Maurizio Cutini
1,
Luciana Di Giacinto
2,
Maria Gabriella Di Serio
2 and
Carlo Bisaglia
1
1
CREA-IT, Research Centre for Engineering and Agri-Food Processing, Treviglio, 24047 Bergamo, Italy
2
CREA-IT, Research Centre for Engineering and Agri-Food Processing, Contrada Bucceri, 65012 Pescara, Italy
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 26 June 2021 / Revised: 30 July 2021 / Accepted: 12 August 2021 / Published: 17 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Evaluation of New Technological Solutions in Agriculture)

Abstract

:
In olive oil extraction processes, different operating methods used for the preparation of olive pastes significantly affect their rheological characteristics, as well as the extraction yields and qualitative characteristics of the oils. To enhance and improve the characteristics of high-quality EVOOs (Extra Virgin Olive Oils), milling technologies have implemented olive pitting in the preparation of olive pastes to be processed for olive oil extraction. Commonly used pitting machines employ the percussion and centrifugal projection of drupes, which often involve the heating of pastes, breaking of kernels, and emulsion of oils. Aiming to improve olive oil pitting processes, the CREA Research Centre for Engineering and Agri-food Processing in Treviglio, Italy, has conceived an alternative method, which is based on the low-speed constriction and mutual abrasion of drupes inside a rotative working chamber. This paper describes the process that led to the hypothesis of an innovative pitting method and to the validation of the hypothesis through the development of a lab-scale pitter prototype. The development steps and the assessment of the results of the prototype trials are reported.

1. Introduction

As is the case for most agro-industrial products, the quality of oil olive yields is mainly subject to the correct adoption and application of all important cultivation practices, to aid the productive potential of the different cultivars, in their various growing areas and orchard managements. All these factors synergically contribute to maximizing the quantity and quality of olives at harvest time [1].
However, the final quality of the olive oils heavily depends on the milling and extraction processes. While it is not possible to obtain valuable oils from low-quality olives, it is quite easy to degrade the quality of the olives at every subsequent stage of the extractive process, up to bottling. These stages include storage time and conditions before milling, crushing machinery and methods, olive paste malaxation parameters, decanter type and settings in the separation of liquid phases from pomace, and so on [2,3,4].
In line with this perspective, since the 1970s, oil extraction technologies and plants have focused not only on maximizing extraction yields, but also on safeguarding and enhancing the qualitative characteristics of the final product [5,6,7,8]. These characteristics can essentially be attributed to two types of substances: one is phenolic compounds, which cause hints of “bitter” and “spicy”, and exert a strong antioxidant and nutraceutical action; the other consists of a wide range of volatile substances, which cause the “fruity” flavors characteristic of different cultivars, whose extremely diverse intensities depend both on the olive cultivar and grove conditions and management, as well as the harvesting time and methods.
Therefore, the goals of oil extraction techniques can be summarised as follows:
-
maximizing extraction yields while preserving the integrity of triglycerides and minor oil components;
-
enhancing or limiting some enzymatic activities to balance the organoleptic paths of the oils.
Different olive milling and management systems significantly affect the amount of phenols and other volatile compounds in extracted oils [9,10,11]. However, although the effects on the final product will differ, no crushing system may be considered better than another.
In general, stone mills enhance the oxidation of phenols, as the olive paste gets mixed for a long time while exposed to the air; they can be useful for balancing the taste of cultivars that produce excessively bitter and spicy oils. On the other hand, disc crushers, especially if hammered, can be more useful in processing cultivars with lower phenolic substances, because reducing exposure to atmospheric oxygen and overheating the olive pastes inhibits the activity of enzymatic pools [12,13,14,15,16,17,18].
In the early 2000s, interest in producing and promoting high-quality EVOOs (Extra Virgin Olive Oils)—for their health benefits and peculiar organoleptic characteristics—led to the technological innovation of implementing olive pitting in the production of olive pastes to be processed in extraction systems.
This method integrates with or replaces the crushing phase, resulting in advantages in terms of maximizing the chemical and organoleptic quality of the oils, as compared to what is obtained from the milling of the whole drupe. Although the absence of pits fragments makes for a less efficient malaxation and reduces the draining of the liquid phase of olive pastes in the decanter during the centrifugation, these negative aspects could partly be solved by increasing the malaxation time and optimizing the decanter setting, thus reducing the mass flow rate [19,20,21]. Olive pitting lowers the thermal stress of olive pastes and improves their rheological characteristics (higher moisture and oil content, and lower acidity and peroxide values). This increases the Rancimat induction time, allowing the olives to gain five to six more months of shelf life [22,23,24,25,26,27], another added advantage of pitted EVOOs; although other authors found no difference between pitted and unpitted olive oils in analytical parameters, nor in taste panels [28]. These characteristics can largely compensate for the losses in extraction yields, amounting to 0.5–1.0%, when compared to whole drupe processing in continuous cycles. The above is also due to the reduction of raw material volumes, ranging from 18 to 22%, depending on the pulp/pit ratio of treated drupes [29,30,31].
Another added advantage of olive pitting is the recovery of polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and other minor components from olive stone seeds, which constitute a second raw material in the cosmetics and pharmaceutical industry [32,33,34]. Moreover, the woody part of the pits provides a sustainable energy source [35,36], while pitted pomace can be used as a component for livestock feed and/or biomass composting [37,38,39].
The commonly used olive pitting machines separate the pulp from the pit by percussion and centrifugal projection of the drupe with a rotative axle, with speeds between 800 and 1400 r × min−1 within a fixed cylindrical grid, with a 3–5 mm diameter hole [40,41].
To avoid the effects of violent milling (i.e., emulsification) and obtaining pulp-only oils, in addition to whole kernels used as a raw material for other agro-industrial products, different pitting solutions could be developed, especially in light of the lack of research and literature regarding these possibilities.
The hypothesis of this work is to devise an innovative “low-speed” olive pitting method as an alternative to percussion and centrifugal projection for the separation of pulps from cores. With this purpose and to assess its feasibility, the CREA-Research Centre for Engineering and Agri-Food Processing in Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy, has patented a new method and developed a specially made lab-scale prototype.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Theoretical Conceptualisation of the Pitting Method

The preliminary theoretical conceptualisation of the pitting method identified the constriction and mutual abrasion of the drupes as an alternative hypothesis to percussion and centrifugal projection, in order to generate the forces needed to separate the olive pulps from their cores. It was hypothesised that this result could be obtained with the help of a low-speed rotary mechanism that would process the olives on a continuous basis from an inlet window, in a variable volume working chamber featuring a forced pulp-extrusion and pit-expulsion pathway. This process is intended to reduce olive paste heating and oil emulsion, thus enhancing their rheological characteristics as well as facilitating the next oil extraction steps.
To achieve this goal, a laboratory-scale prototype was developed, adopting and testing different forms of working chambers, and various kind of bulkheads, to optimise the pathway of the drupes, the extrusion of the pulps through the holes of the base grid, and the ejection of whole and cleaned pits through a peripheral outlet.
The prototype was developed using the method of trial and error, which entailed trying out conceptually plausible solutions to the problem, testing and then discarding the false ones as erroneous. This method assumes working with an adequate number of experimental solutions, as one solution after another was put to the test and eliminated [42].
A decreasing volume was obtained by creating the upper part of the bell-shaped separator, higher in the centre, towards the induction chamber, gradually lower towards the periphery, and with the lowest point, corresponding to the exhaust outlet, adjustable according to the transverse diameter of the pits (Figure 1).
The removable drilled circular base was connected to the machinery by means of a tripod support as body, featuring a rail for the rotating bell cover, on the inner surface of which, different conformations were built and tested for the working chamber.

2.2. Test Conditions and Analysis on Olive Saples

To evaluate the mechanical efficiency of the prototypes, the pitting tests were performed with different olive samples, as they became available on the market.
For the assessment of the final prototype and patented pitting method, olive samples were used from a Cassanese cultivar; they were supplied by the CREA experimental farm in Pescara, Italy, and selected according to a homogeneous 4–5 Maturity Index (MI) (Figure 2).
To compare the rheological characteristics of the olive pastes produced and the pitted residues (pulps and unextruded skins), and to have an analytical feedback for further validation of the patented method, a 5 kg olive sample was pitted using the prototype. Additionally, another 5 kg olive sample was milled with a mini-crusher and malaxated for about 10 min at room temperature (approx. 16 °C), using a lab-scale malaxer machine.
The following analyses were then carried out on the two samples of olive pastes obtained and on the unextruded pitting residual (pulp, skins, and pits):
-
dry matter content;
-
oil content;
-
weight of pit fragments, pulp, and skins.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Developing an Effective Prototype through the Comparison of Different Working Chambers

Initially, the inner surface of the cover, corresponding to the upper part of the working chamber, was set up with 3 blades whose profiles recalled a logarithmic spiral increasing its radius starting from the centre towards the periphery (Figure 3a). The results of the functional tests show that, with this conformation, the extrusion of the pulp takes place only in the peripheral part of the working chamber, close to the peripheral window where the pits are ejected (Figure 3b).
To obtain pulp extrusion also in the central area of the drilled base, a different conformation and geometry of the working chamber was evaluated, which led to a second prototype, characterised by sloping and tangential straight wings in the inner surface of the bell (Figure 4a). However, this solution showed no improvement compared to the previous one (Figure 4b).
It was therefore felt that a factor other than the geometry of the working chamber had greater influence on the desired abrasion and constriction effect. The hypothesis developed following the experimentation on the second prototype was that the gradient of the bell was too high, meaning that the distance between the lower and upper surface of the working chamber in the initial and central part of the pathway of the drupes was too excessive for the size and mass of the prototype. This hypothesis was supported by the fact that pulp extrusion occurred only in the peripheral part of the machine, where the height of the working chamber was lowest, and the force applied to the single drupe was highest.
Based on these preliminary trials, a third prototype (Figure 5a) was then assembled with the aim increasing pressure and constriction on the drupe over the entire extrusion surface. This effect was achieved by conducting the following:
  • reducing the volume of the working chamber, from an initial height of 80 mm to 30 mm, lowering by up to 5 mm on the periphery;
  • increasing the drupe retention time inside the machine, by lengthening its path with the adoption of two spiral conveyor bulkheads.
Please note that these two solutions indirectly allow another important effect; reducing the number of drupes processed per unit of time, thus increasing the specific amount of pressure for each individual drupe, i.e., the action of abrasion and constriction leading to pulp separation and extrusion (Figure 5b).
The results of the trial with the third prototype show pulp extrusion over the entire surface of the drilled base of the working chamber. This result confirms the hypothesis that the most important factor for the separation of the pulps from their pits is the space between the surfaces of the working chamber, i.e., the specific amount of pressure brought on a single drupe. However, although it was possible for the entire volume of the processing chamber to work, inefficiencies were detected as far as complete cleaning of the pits and extrusion of the pulps was concerned. This led to the consideration that the drupes staying in the machine for a longer time was an additional efficiency factor. The conformation of the working chamber and the arrangement of the conveying bulkheads were then further modified, with the creation of a drupe collection and conveying chamber below the feed window, and the adoption of a single spiral conveyor bulkhead (Figure 6a). A series of straight scrapes were performed on the surface of the drilled base, tangentially to the upper feed window, to increase friction and abrasion. This solution made it possible to enhance both the flow of drupes and the separation of the pulps from the pits (Figure 6b).

3.2. The Prototype Assembled

In the ultimate version, the prototype (Figure 7) was made of a tripod body, to which flanges were added consisting of a three-phase electric unit, a drilled base plate for pitted pulp extrusion and a circular track. The rotating bell was fitted with four wide-channel wheels on height-adjustable supports, and a handle pulley; the inlet window for the drupes was fixed in the centre of the bell-shaped rotating unit.
As described above, the inner surface of the bell was shaped like a spiral chamber with a variable volume that guided the drupes through a pathway from the central inlet window up to the peripheral space where the pits were expelled.
In this lab-scale prototype, the drilled base plate had a diameter of 600 mm, while the working chamber had a cone trunk shape with a space between the two surfaces that measured from 30 mm close to the centre to 5 mm at the peripheral expulsion window, and an inner drupe pathway of about 3.4 m, with a volume of about 4 L.
The motion transmission system of the rotating bell was provided by a belt and pulley, and the rotational speed was set to 0.32 Hz (19.2 r × min−1). With this configuration, a single drupe took about 8 s to get through the working chamber.
The average power absorption of prototype with the chamber full, was 51 W.
With this configuration, the prototype theoretically allowed for the processing of about 1.6 m3 × h−1 of olives.

3.3. Determination of Moisture and Dry Matter of Olive Pulp Samples

After homogenisation, the pitted and unpitted olive pulp samples were stove dried at 105 °C for 24 h, until a constant weight was obtained. The moisture percentages were then calculated as follows:
M % = 100 − [(P1 − P)/g] ∗ 100
where: P = weight of the empty vessel; P1 = weight of the vessel with dried matter; g = initial weight of fresh matter.
dry matter (DM)% = 100 − M %

3.4. Determination of the Oil Content of Olive Pulp Samples

The oil content was determined by solvent extraction on dried samples with the Soxhlet system, using petroleum ether at 40–60 °C for 6 h [37].

3.5. Evaluation of Residues

The pitting residue was manually separated by cleansing the pits from the pulp and skin residues, and then weighed.
The samples of whole and pitted olive pastes were evaluated twice after carefully mixing them to make them homogeneous.
The two fractions of pulp and pit fragments were separated from the whole olive paste, through the physical process of continuous water leaching [38].

3.6. Data Analysis of Pitted and Unpitted Olive Samples

Table 1 shows the values of the analyses carried out on the olive paste samples obtained by the crushing of whole olives. Its dry matter content was 39.54%, and its water content was 60.46%; while the pulp result was 85.17%, the pits were 14.83%, and the oil content on fresh matter was 14.36%.
To calculate the mechanical efficiency of the prototype, the composition of the extruded and not extruded fraction is shown in Table 2.
The experimental test performed with the prototype showed that the extruded fraction turned out to be 61.76% of the olive mass, which consisted entirely of the pulp. The remaining 38.24% represented the not extruded fraction consisting of 23.41% of pulp and 14.83% of pits.
Table 3 compares the values of the analyses carried out on the whole and pitted olive paste samples. The pitted paste shows lower dry matter and higher oil on fresh matter contents with respect to the milled paste; these differences were mainly due to the absence of pits and skins from unextruded drupes.
According to these results, we can calculate the mechanical efficiency of the prototype (Table 4); as in the whole olive sample. The pulp turned out to be 85.17%, the efficiency of the prototype was 72.51% (100 ∗ 61.76/85.17) and the loss 27.49% (100 − 72.51), or 100 ∗ (23.41/85.17).

4. Conclusions

In the olive mill industry, olive pastes for oil extraction are usually obtained by stone mills or disc/hammer crushers. In the early 2000s, the increasing interest in producing and promoting high-quality EVOOs (Extra Virgin Olive Oils)—for their health benefits and peculiar organoleptic characteristics—led to the technological innovation of implementing olive pitting in the production of pulp-only olive pastes to be processed in extraction systems [43].
The commonly used olive pitting machines separate the pulp from the pit by the percussion and centrifugal projection of the drupe with a rotative axle in a cylindrical drilled grill. The benefits and the disadvantages of this method have been detailed in the introduction.
Following the approach of obtaining pulp-only olive paste avoiding the effects of violent milling (i.e., emulsification), an innovative “low-speed” olive pitting method has been devised, based on constriction and the mutual abrasion of the drupes, and extrusion of their pulps by pressure.
With this aim, a lab-scale prototype was developed to investigate the main mechanical characteristics required to check the feasibility of the patented method.
In this study, the optimal mechanical solution was found by the “trial and error” method, step-by-step testing, discarding ineffective solutions, and consequently modifying the specific parts identified, until the achievement of an adequate mechanically functioning final prototype in terms of separation and extrusion of the olive pulps, given its structural limitations.
The pitting trials performed with the final prototype showed the feasibility of the patented method, both in terms of the separation of the pulps from pits, and in the values of parameters considered from the olive pastes obtained, in line with the data reported in the literature.
This approach had the main aim of mitigating the thermal stresses produced by violent pitting, as well as reducing the amount of processed olive paste by approximately 18–22%, according to the pulp/pit ratios of the olives. The higher humidity of pitted pastes can also facilitate the separation of oil from wastewater and pomace, where, given the same decanter retention time for the paste, processing saw an increase of about 20–25%. Alternatively, extraction yields may be improved given the same processing capacity, by proportionally increasing paste retention time. In both cases, a pulp-only oil with potentially more pleasant organoleptic characteristics and a higher shelf-life can be obtained.
As for the by-products, from the whole stones recoverable with this pitting system, oil and minor components of high added value can be obtained as second raw materials (End of Waste), for cosmetics or the pharmaceutical industry. This can largely compensate for oil extraction losses, compared to the extraction yields of whole olives. Furthermore, the woody fraction of the pits has a market as a high energy renewable fuel, while pitted pomace can be used in the composition of livestock feed or biomass matrices to produce high quality compost.
As for the assessment of the mechanical efficiency of the prototype in separating the olive pulps from their pits, the results that were obtained did not allow for a definitive quantification due to the structural limitations of the small-scale prototype, which required multiple runs of drupe samples for pulp extrusion.
Although a significant percentage of the pulp and skins (27.49%) was expelled with the pits, despite the high MI of the olives used, the extrusion value of 72.51% can be positively considered, in terms of the feasibility of the patented method, given the structural limits of the lab-scale prototype.
This preliminary study highlighted that the factors to be improved in order to maximise the machine efficiency were: (i) the mass of the rotating bell acting on the drupes; (ii) the single spiral shape of the pathway bulkheads; (iii) the drupes retention time, as a function of both the speed of the rotating bell and length of the pathway; and (iv) the diameter of the extrusion holes of the drilled base.
These are the main factors that could lead to an efficient industrial pitter, achieving the full separation and extrusion of olive pulps and recovering clean and intact pits. The further goal of this project will be the development of a real-scale industrial pitter, to compare the rheological characteristics of pitted paste (i.e., level of emulsification, pulp heating, intensity of pulping) as well as the qualitative parameters of oils obtained versus the current pitting system, from the perspective of implementing this patented method in high-quality EVOOs extraction plants.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, P.T. and M.C.; Data curation, P.T., L.D.G. and M.G.D.S.; Formal analysis, L.D.G. and M.G.D.S.; Funding acquisition, C.B.; Investigation, P.T.; Methodology, P.T., M.C., L.D.G. and C.B.; Project administration, P.T. and C.B.; Supervision, P.T. and C.B.; Validation, P.T., M.C., L.D.G. and C.B.; Writing—original draft, P.T., M.C., L.D.G. and C.B.; Writing—review & editing, P.T., M.C., L.D.G. and C.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not Applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not Applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank for their technical support: Gianluigi Rozzoni, Ivan Carminati, Alex Filisetti and Elia Premoli (CREA-IT, 24047 Treviglio, Bergamo, Italy); and Carlo Di Marco and Nicola Simone (CREA-IT, 65012 Pescara, Italy).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Toscano, P.; Iannotta, N.; Scalercio, S. Botanical and Agricultural Aspects: Agronomic Techniques and Orchard Management. Agric. Food Biotechnol. Olea Eur. Stone Fruit 2015, 1, 3–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Inglese, P.; Famiani, F.; Galvano, F.; Servili, M.; Esposto, S.; Urbani, S. Factors Affecting Extra-Virgin Olive Oil Composition. In Horticultural Reviews; AVI Publishing Company: Westport, CT, USA, 2010; Volume 38, pp. 83–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Di Giovacchino, L.; Sestili, S.; Vincenzo, D. Influence of olive processing on virgin olive oil quality. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. 2002, 104, 587–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Lanzani, A.; Bondioli, P.; Cozzoli, O.; Folegatti, L.; Fedeli, E. Influence of technical parameters on virgin olive oils quality in industrial practice. Riv. It. Sostanze Grasse 1990, 67, 559–567. [Google Scholar]
  5. Amirante, P.; Di Renzo, G.C.; Di Giovacchino, L.; Bianchi, B.; Catalano, P. Technological developments in olive oil extraction plants. Olivae 1993, 48, 43–53. [Google Scholar]
  6. Clodoveo, M.L.; Hbaieb, R.H.; Kotti, F.; Scarascia Mugnozza, G.; Gargouri, M. Mechanical Strategies to Increase Nutritional and Sensory Quality of Virgin Olive Oil by Modulating the Endogenous Enzyme Activities. Compr. Rev. Food Sci. Food Saf. 2014, 13, 135–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  7. Amirante, P. From olives to oil: Evolution of olive oil extraction technologies. Agric. Mech. Lessons 2017. Available online: www.researchgate.net/publication/321309422 (accessed on 12 September 2020). (In Italian).
  8. Di Giovacchino, L.; Solinas, M.; Miccoli, M. Effect of the extraction systems on the quality of virgin olive oil. Am. J. Oil Chem. Soc. 1994, 71, 1189–1194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Angerosa, F.; Di Giacinto, L. Crushing influence on the quality characteristics of virgin olive oil. Riv. It. Sostanze Grasse 1995, 72, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  10. Caponio, F.; Gomes, T.; Summo, C.; Pasqualone, A. Influence of the type of olive-crusher used on the quality of extra virgin olive oils. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2003, 105, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Angerosa, F.; Mostallino, R.; Basti, C.; Vito, R. Influence of malaxation temperature and time on the quality of virgin olive oils. Food Chem. 2001, 72, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Caponio, F.; Alloggio, V.; Gomes, T. Phenolic compounds of virgin olive oil: Influence of paste preparation techniques. Food Chem. 1999, 64, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Solinas, M.; Di Giovacchino, L.; Mascolo, A. The polyphenols of olives and olive oil. Note III: Influence of temperature and kneading time on the polyphenol content. Riv. It. Sost. Grasse 1978, 55, 19–23. [Google Scholar]
  14. Olias, J.M.; Perez, A.G.; Rios, J.J.; Sanz, L.C. Aroma of virgin olive oil: Biogenesis of the ‘‘green’’ odor notes. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1993, 41, 2368–2373. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Servili, M.; Montedoro, G.F. Contribution of phenolic compounds to virgin olive oil quality. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2002, 104, 606–613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gutierrez, G.-Q.R.; Janer, D.V.C.; Janer, D.V.M.L.; Gutierrez, R.F.; Vazquez, R.A. Relacion entre los polifenoles y la calidad y estabilidad del aceite de olive virgen. Grasas Y Aceites 1977, 28, 101–106. [Google Scholar]
  17. Servili, M.; Baldioli, M.; Mariotti, F.; Montedoro, G.; Metzidakis, I.; Voyiatzis, D. Phenolic composition of olive fruits and virgin olive oil: Distribution in the constitutive parts of fruit and evolution during the oil mechanical extraction process. Acta Hortic. 1999, 474, 609–614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ranalli, A.; Pollastri, L.; Contento, S.; Iannucci, E.; Lucera, L. Effect of olive paste kneading process time on the overall quality of virgin olive oil. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2003, 105, 57–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Amirante, P.; Clodoveo, M.L.; Leone, A.; Tamborrino, A. Plant innovations for the production and enhancement of olive oil with respect for the environment. Ital. J. Agron. Riv. Agron. 2009, 1, 147–161. (In Italian) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Romaniello, R.; Leone, A.; Tamborrino, A. Specification of a new de-stoner machine: Evaluation of machining effects on olive paste’s rheology and olive oil yield and quality. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2016, 97, 115–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Amirante, P.; Clodoveo, M.L.; Dugo, G.; Leone, A.; Tamborrino, A. Advance technology in virgin olive oil production from traditional and de-stoned pastes: Influence of the introduction of a heat exchanger on oil quality. Food Chem. 2006, 98, 797–805. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Servili, M.; Taticchi, A.; Esposto, S.; Urbani, S.; Selvaggini, R.; Montedoro, G. Effect of olive stoning on the volatile and phenolic composition of virgin olive oil. J. Agric Food Chem. 2007, 55, 7028–7035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Katsoyannos, E.; Batrinou, A.; Chatzilazarou, A.; Bratakos, S.M.; Stamatopoulos, K.; Sinanoglou, V.J. Quality parameters of olive oil from stoned and nonstoned Koroneiki and Megaritiki Greek olive varieties at different maturity levels. Grasas Y Aceites 2015, 66, e067. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Frega, N.; Caglioti, L.; Mozzon, M. Chemical composition and quality parameters of oils extracted from pitted olives. Riv. It. Sost. Grasse 1997, 74, 241–245. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  25. Angerosa, F.; Basti, C.; Vito, R.; Lanza, B. Effect of fruit stone removal on the production of virgin olive oil volatile compounds. Food Chem. 1999, 67, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Metrohm Application Bulletin No. 204/1e. In Oxidative Stability of Oil and Fats—Rancimat Method; Metrohm AG: Herisau, Switzerland, 1993; Available online: https://www.metrohm.com/en-us/applications/AB-204 (accessed on 12 September 2020).
  27. Mancebo-Campos, V.; Desamparados, S.M.; Fregapane, G. Comparative Study of Virgin Olive Oil Behavior under Rancimat Accelerated Oxidation Conditions and Long-Term Room Temperature Storage. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2007, 55, 8231–8236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Patumi, M.; Terenziani, S.; Ridolfi, M.; Fontanazza, G. Effect of Fruit Stoning on Olive Oil Quality. J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 2003, 80, 249–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Amirante, P.; Catalano, P.; Amirante, R.; Clodoveo, M.L.; Montel, G.L.; Leone, A.; Baccioni, L. Experimental tests for the extraction of extra virgin olive oils from pitted pastes. Olivo Olio 2002, 5, 16–22. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  30. Amirante, P.; Catalano, P.; Amirante, R.; Montel, G.L.; Dugo, G.; Lo Turco, V.; Baccioni, L.; Fazio, D.; Mattei, A.; Marotta, F. Extraction from pitted pastes. Olivo Olio 2001, 4, 48–58. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  31. Montedoro, G.F.; Baldioli, M.; Servili, M. Extraction of virgin oil from pitted pastes. Olivo Olio 2001, 4, 28–32. (In Italian) [Google Scholar]
  32. Matos, M.; Barreiro, M.F.; Gandini, A. Olive stone as a renewable source of biopolyols. Ind. Crops Prod. 2010, 32, 7–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Rodríguez, G.; Lama, A.; Rodríguez, R.; Jiménez, A.; Guillén, R.; Fernández-Bolaños, J. Olive stone an attractive source of bioactive and valuable compounds. Bioresour. Tecnol. 2008, 99, 5261–5269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ranalli, A.; Pollastri, L.; Contento, S.; Di Loreto, G.; Iannucci, E.; Lucera, L.; Russi, F. Acylglycerol and fatty acid components of pulp, seed, and whole olive fruit oils. Their use to characterize fruit variety by chemometrics. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3775–3779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Vourdoubas, J. Possibilities of using olive kernel wood for pellets production in CretedGreece. In Proceedings of the 16th European Biomass Conference & Exhibition, Valencia, Spain, 2–6 June 2008; Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/328343723 (accessed on 20 April 2021).
  36. Bartocci, P.; D’Amico, M.; Moriconi, N.; Bidini, G.; Fantozzi, F. Pyrolysis of olive stone for energy purposes. Energy Procedia. 2015, 82, 374–380. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Di Serio, M.G.; Lanza, B.; Iannucci, E.; Russi, F.; Di Giovacchino, L. Valorization of wet olive pomace produced by 2 and 3-phases centrifugal decanter. Riv. Ital. Delle Sostanze Grasse 2011, 88, 111–117. [Google Scholar]
  38. Di Serio, M.G.; Iannucci, E.; Russi, F.; Lanza, B.; Mucciarella, M.R.; Di Giovacchino, L. Valorization of the olive pomace deriving from continuous extraction system. In Proceedings of the Ricerca ed Innovazione per l’Olivicoltura Meridionale Convegno Internazionale sui Risultati del Progetto Riom, Rende, Italy, 11–12 June 2009. (In Italian). [Google Scholar]
  39. Toscano, P.; Montemurro, F. Olive Mill By-Products Management. In Olive Germplasm—The Olive Cultivation, Table Olive and Olive Oil Industry in Italy; InTechOpen: London, UK, 2012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Leone, A.; Romaniello, R.; Peri, G.; Tamborrino, A. Development of a new model of olives de-stoner machine: Evaluation of electric consumption and kernel characterization. Biomass Bioenergy 2015, 81, 108–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Leone, A.; Romaniello, R.; Zagaria, R.; Sabella, E.; De Bellis, L.; Tamborrino, A. Machining effects of different mechanical crushers on pit particle size and oil drop distribution in olive paste. Eur. J. Lipid Sci. Technol. 2015, 117, 1271–1279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Popper, K. All Life is Problem Solving; Routledge: New York, NY, USA, 1999; ISBN 0415 249929. [Google Scholar]
  43. Restuccia, D.; Clodoveo, M.L.; Corbo, F.; Loizzo, M.R. De-stoning technology for improving olive oil nutritional and sensory features: The right idea at the wrong time. Food Res. Int. 2018, 106, 636–646. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Conceptual scheme of the pitting prototype.
Figure 1. Conceptual scheme of the pitting prototype.
Agriengineering 03 00040 g001
Figure 2. Drupes used in the pitting tests of the final prototype.
Figure 2. Drupes used in the pitting tests of the final prototype.
Agriengineering 03 00040 g002
Figure 3. First prototype realisation: (a) working chamber with 3 spiral blades; (b) extrusion of pitted olive pulp.
Figure 3. First prototype realisation: (a) working chamber with 3 spiral blades; (b) extrusion of pitted olive pulp.
Agriengineering 03 00040 g003
Figure 4. Second prototype realisation: (a) working chamber with multiple tangential straight wings; (b) extrusion of pitted olive pulp.
Figure 4. Second prototype realisation: (a) working chamber with multiple tangential straight wings; (b) extrusion of pitted olive pulp.
Agriengineering 03 00040 g004
Figure 5. Third prototype realisation: (a) double spiral working chamber; (b) extrusion of pitted olive pulp.
Figure 5. Third prototype realisation: (a) double spiral working chamber; (b) extrusion of pitted olive pulp.
Agriengineering 03 00040 g005
Figure 6. The final prototype: (a) collection chamber below the feed window and a single spiral conveyor bulkhead working chamber; (b) extrusion of pitted pulps.
Figure 6. The final prototype: (a) collection chamber below the feed window and a single spiral conveyor bulkhead working chamber; (b) extrusion of pitted pulps.
Agriengineering 03 00040 g006
Figure 7. Overview of the working elements of the final prototype.
Figure 7. Overview of the working elements of the final prototype.
Agriengineering 03 00040 g007
Table 1. Main characteristics of the whole olives paste.
Table 1. Main characteristics of the whole olives paste.
FactorWhole Olives
Dry matter (%)39.54
Oil on fresh matter (%)14.36
Pulp (%)85.17
Pits (%)14.83
Table 2. Output of olives fraction obtained with the prototype.
Table 2. Output of olives fraction obtained with the prototype.
Extruded Fraction (%)Not Extruded Fraction (%)
61.7638.24
Pulp (%)Pit (%)Pulp (%)Pit (%)
100061.2238.78
Table 3. Analyses of the average characteristics of whole and pitted olive paste.
Table 3. Analyses of the average characteristics of whole and pitted olive paste.
FactorWhole Olive Paste (Milled)Pitted Olive Paste (Extruded)
Dry matter (%)39.5432.90
Oil on fresh matter (%)14.3618.47
Table 4. Pitting prototype efficiency.
Table 4. Pitting prototype efficiency.
Considered FactorValues
Lost pulp (%)27.49
Pitting prototype efficiency (%)72.51
Oil content (%)14.36
Pitted pulp (%)61.76
Oil content in the pitted pulp (%)11.41
Oil lost with the prototype (%)2.95
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Toscano, P.; Cutini, M.; Di Giacinto, L.; Di Serio, M.G.; Bisaglia, C. Development of a Lab-Scale Prototype for Validating an Innovative Pitting Method of Oil Olives. AgriEngineering 2021, 3, 622-632. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriengineering3030040

AMA Style

Toscano P, Cutini M, Di Giacinto L, Di Serio MG, Bisaglia C. Development of a Lab-Scale Prototype for Validating an Innovative Pitting Method of Oil Olives. AgriEngineering. 2021; 3(3):622-632. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriengineering3030040

Chicago/Turabian Style

Toscano, Pietro, Maurizio Cutini, Luciana Di Giacinto, Maria Gabriella Di Serio, and Carlo Bisaglia. 2021. "Development of a Lab-Scale Prototype for Validating an Innovative Pitting Method of Oil Olives" AgriEngineering 3, no. 3: 622-632. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriengineering3030040

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop