Next Article in Journal
Inter-Reader Agreement of ATA Sonographic Risk in Thyroid Nodules with Bethesda Category III Indeterminate Cytology
Next Article in Special Issue
Endocrine Responses to Sport-Related Brain Injury in Female Athletes: A Narrative Review and a Call for Action
Previous Article in Journal / Special Issue
Exercise as a Therapeutic Intervention in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Endocrines
Volume 2
Issue 2
10.3390/endocrines2020008
endocrines-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Influence of Menstrual Cycle or Hormonal Contraceptive Phase on Energy Intake and Metabolic Hormones—A Pilot Study

by
Johanna K. Ihalainen
1,*,†,
Ida Löfberg
1,†,
Anna Kotkajuuri
1,
Heikki Kyröläinen
1,
Anthony C. Hackney
2 and
Ritva S. Taipale-Mikkonen
1,3
1
Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, 40014 Jyväskylä, Finland
2
Department of Exercise & Sport Science–Department of Nutrition, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
3
Sports Technology Unit, Faculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, 88610 Vuokatti, Finland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
†
Equal contribution.
Endocrines 2021, 2(2), 79-90; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/endocrines2020008
Submission received: 24 March 2021 / Revised: 9 April 2021 / Accepted: 13 April 2021 / Published: 16 April 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Exercise Endocrinology)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Sex hormones are suggested to influence energy intake (EI) and metabolic hormones. This study investigated the influence of menstrual cycle (MC) and hormonal contraceptive (HC) cycle phases on EI, energy availability (EA), and metabolic hormones in recreational athletes (eumenorrheic, NHC = 15 and monophasic HC-users, CHC = 9). In addition, 72-h dietary and training logs were collected in addition to blood samples, which were analyzed for 17β-estradiol (E2), progesterone (P4), leptin, total ghrelin, insulin, and tri-iodothyronine (T3). Measurements were completed at four time-points (phases): Bleeding, mid-follicular (FP)/active 1, ovulation (OVU)/active 2, mid-luteal (LP)/inactive in NHC/CHC, respectively. As expected, E2 and P4 fluctuated significantly in NHC (p < 0.05) and remained stable in CHC. In NHC, leptin increased significantly between bleeding and ovulation (p = 0.030) as well as between FP and OVU (p = 0.022). No group differences in other measured hormones were observed across the MC and HC cycle. The mean EI and EA were similar between phases, with no significant differences observed in macronutrient intake over either the MC or HC. While the MC phase might have a small, but statistically significant effect on leptin, the findings of the present study suggest that the MC or HC phase does not significantly alter ad libitum EI or EA in recreational athletes.

1. Introduction

Women of reproductive age are exposed to hormonal fluctuations during their menstrual cycle (MC) [1]. Sex hormones, such as 17β-estradiol (E2) and progesterone (P4), have broad effects on several body systems and functions that have physiological and behavioral consequences, including those that influence nutritional habits [2]. The mean energy intake (EI) is reported to be lowest before ovulation, when E2 is high, whereas the highest levels of EI have been observed during the luteal phase when P4 is increased [2]. These observations suggest that P4 may have appetite-enhancing effects that would lead to higher EI, whereas E2 may potentially inhibit appetite and, thus, EI [2]. The hormonal contraceptive (HC) use suppresses the fluctuation of endogenous sex hormones via a negative feedback on gonadotrophic hormones, resulting in relatively stable and low E2 and P4 concentrations [3]. Some earlier studies have reported that women using HCs consumed slightly more calories compared to non-users [4,5], while others have not observed differences in ad libitum EI [6]. To our knowledge, however, there are no studies on the effects of hormonal contraceptive cycle (HC), i.e., active hormonal versus inactive phase, on EI in recreational athletes. As HC use continues its upward trend among female athletes [7], it is important to consider the effects of varying concentrations of exogenous sex hormones on EI.
The dietary intake is modulated by the complex interplay of neurochemical, hormonal, physiological, and psychological factors. In this network, metabolic hormones, leptin, ghrelin, and insulin, play significant roles in appetite-regulation via specific neurons located in the hypothalamus [2]. Indeed, leptin, derived from adipose tissue, and insulin, from the pancreas, act as appetite-inhibiting signals that play an important role in long-term energy homeostasis [2], while ghrelin, secreted from gastric mucosa, stimulates hunger in response to fasting [8]. Given that leptin and ghrelin have regulatory roles in maintaining the reproductive capacity and initiating puberty, it is conceivable that they have a dynamic relationship with female sex hormones [2]. Despite the general agreement that leptin is negatively associated with EI and appetite [9] with respect to the MC, studies have reported conflicting results. That is, prior research has reported higher leptin levels coinciding with ovulation [10] and during the luteal phase [11], whereas, other studies have failed to observe a significant effect of the MC on leptin [12,13,14]. Studies examining the effects of MC on ghrelin have not observed a significant fluctuation [15], although ghrelin concentrations have been negatively associated with daily EI [16]. Finally, a possible factor that may affect EI is food cravings, which can be affected by the MC phase [2].
The concept of energy availability (EA) is defined as dietary EI minus the energy expended due to exercise. As such, EA is the amount of dietary energy remaining after exercise training for all other physiological processes that contribute to maintaining homeostasis in the body [17]. Adequate EA is, of course, required in order to maintain hormonal function, whereas the MC is an indicator of energy balance in women who are not pregnant, nursing or using hormonal contraceptives [18]. Metabolic hormones have been shown to be sensitive to changes in EA in athletes [19], however, the time-course of the changes in EA and metabolic hormones, as well as the possible effect of sex hormones on these associations is still somewhat unclear.
Studies examining EI, EA, EEE, and concentrations of metabolic hormones across the MC or HC are few. As such, the aim of this study was to investigate changes in self-reported EI, EA, macronutrient intake, as well as metabolic hormones, leptin, ghrelin, insulin, and glucose concentrations, across the MC in recreational female athletes using or not using hormonal contraceptives. Additionally, the associations between measured variables were examined.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Participants

Healthy women, age 18–40 years, were recruited by advertisements in social media and the local newspaper. Participants filled in a health questionnaire and Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire (LEAF-Q) prior to participation in the study [20]. Inclusion criteria required that participants be recreationally physically active (strength training three times∙week−1 and endurance training three times∙week−1) with a BMI of 18–25 kg∙m−2 and LEAF-Q score <8. Participants were excluded if they were pregnant or lactating, if they had conditions affecting the ovarian function, amenorrhea, endocrine disorders or chronic diseases or if they were taking medication that may affect exercise responses. All participants reported that they did not smoke, were free from injury, and were not using any medications. Each subject was informed of the potential risks and discomforts associated with the measurements, and all of the subjects gave their written informed consent to participate. The study was conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki, and the Ethics Committee of the University of Jyväskylä (22 October 2018), approved the study.
A total of 33 women were enrolled in the study. Five participants dropped out prior to the completion of the study due to personal reasons or schedule conflicts. Four more participants were excluded from the analysis due to a lack of information provided in their personal dietary or training logs. Data were ultimately analyzed and are presented for n = 24. Descriptive data (gathered at bleeding (menses/withdrawal bleed)), including participant characteristics are presented in Table 1. Participants were either eumenorrheic and had not used an HC for at least 1 year (NHC = 15) or had used a monophasic contraception with combined synthetic estrogen and progestin HC for at least 1 year (CHC, n = 9). The data presented are part of a larger endogenous and exogenous hormone and performance in women (MEndEx) study.

2.2. Study Design

Each participant visited the laboratory four times. In the NHC group, participants visited the laboratory during bleeding (BLE, day 2–4 of the participant’s MC), mid-follicular phase (FP, 7–11 days from the onset of bleeding), ovulation (OVU, determined from the urine test, see below), and mid-luteal phase (LP, 7 days after ovulation). The CHC participants visited the laboratory at the end of inactive phase (non-pill/placebo, bleeding), twice during the active pill phase separated by 7 days, and at the beginning of the inactive (non-pill/placebo) phase. The phase of the MC or HC cycle in which testing commenced was randomized. Data are presented such that the phases of the MC and HC were “matched” at bleeding. Procedures were performed according to the current recommendations for best practice [21]. Ovulation was identified using a daily urine test completed by the participant at home starting mid-FP to identify the LH surge (Dipro, LH Ovulation Strip, Aidian Oy, Finland). Ovulation was detected in all the NHC participants and MC phases in NHC were retrospectively confirmed by the analysis of serum hormones as described in Section 2.5.

2.3. Body Composition

Anthropometric measurements were completed in the morning after 12 h of fasting. The height of the participants was measured with a wall-mounted stadiometer. The body mass and body composition were measured using bioimpedance (Inbody 720, Biospace Co., Seoul, Korea).

2.4. Nutrition, Energy Intake, and Energy Availability

Participants were instructed to maintain their typical diet throughout the study and were instructed to continue eating as they normally would, ad libitum. Participants completed 72-h dietary and training logs starting from each laboratory visit. Written and verbal instructions were given to ensure accurate record keeping. The dietary logs were analyzed for energy and macronutrient intake using the software (Fineli, National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Finland). Training logs were analyzed for exercise energy expenditure (EEE) using metabolic equivalent of task (MET) values for different activities [22]. EA was estimated as EI minus EEE and expressed in kcal·kg fat-free mass (FFM)−1·day (d)−1 [17]. Participants reported food cravings, assessed dichotomously as “yes” or “no”, as part of the dietary log. If the participants answered “yes”, they were asked to record specific food cravings and the actual food item(s) craved. The number of ‘yes’ answers was calculated. “Yes” included sweet, salty, soda drinks, and experiencing more hunger than usual. “No” included mentions of absence of cravings or the absence of notes on cravings.

2.5. Venous Blood Samples

Blood samples were collected in the morning (7:00–9:00 a.m.) after a 12 h overnight fast. Participants were instructed to abstain from strenuous physical activity for 24 h before the blood samples were taken. Venous blood samples were drawn from an antecubital vein using standard procedures and the blood was transferred into serum and EDTA tubes (Venosafe, Terumo, Belgium). The serum samples were held for 15 min at room temperature before being centrifuged for 10 min at 2000× g (Megafuge 1.0 R, Heraeus, Germany). The serum was separated and immediately frozen at −80 °C for later analysis. Leptin was assessed with the Biovendor Human Leptin ELISA. Total ghrelin was assessed with the Biovendor Human Ghrelin Easy Sampling ELISA from plasma after incubation at room temperature for 2 h. The assay sensitivity for ghrelin was 10 mg·L−1. Other hormonal analyses were performed using chemical luminescence techniques (Immulite 2000, Siemens Healthcare Diagnostics, Camberley, UK) with an assay sensitivity of 55.0 pmol∙L−1 for E2, 0.3 ng∙mL−1 for P4, 0.2 ng∙mL−1 for leptin, 1.5 mmol·L−1 for T3, 10 ng∙L−1 for ghrelin, 2 mIU∙L−1 for insulin, and 0.1 nmol∙L−1 for glucose. Inter-assay coefficients of variation (CV) were 6.7% for E2, 9.7% for P4, 4.2% for leptin, 8.1% for T3, 6.8% for ghrelin, 5.1% for insulin, and 1.4% for glucose.

2.6. Statistical Analyses

Statistical analyses were conducted using SPSS Statistics 24 (IBM, Armonk, NY, USA). Results are reported as mean ± SD. Due to the small sample size, nonparametric tests were used. A Mann-Whitney-U test was used to examine baseline differences between groups, while Friedman’s ANOVA was used to analyze a main effect for time. A Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to complete pair-wise comparisons between time points. Between group differences in food cravings were examined using the Chi Square test. The related-samples Cochrans Q test assessed the effect of MC and HC phase on cravings. Associations between hormones and dietary intake were examined with Spearman’s correlation. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

3. Results

3.1. Hormonal Fluctuations

Concentrations of analyzed hormones for each phase are presented in Table 2. As expected, E2 and P4 fluctuated significantly in NHC and remained stable in CHC. In NHC, E2 was significantly higher at FP, OVU, and LP than at BLE (p = 0.006, p = 0.005, p = 0.001, respectively). Concentrations of E2 were higher in NHC than in CHC at FP/active1 (p = 0.002), OVU/active2 (p = 0.004), and at LP/inactive (p < 0.001). In NHC, P4 was higher at OVU and FP than BLE (p = 0.030 and p = 0.001), as well as being higher at LP and FP than BLE (p = 0.001 and p = 0.006). Concentrations of P4 were higher in NHC than in CHC at OVU/active2 (p = 0.017), and at LP/inactive (p = 0.003).
In NHC leptin increased significantly between BLE and OVU (p = 0.030) as well as between FP and OVU (p = 0.022), however, no group differences were observed across phases between NHC and CHC.
Ghrelin, insulin, T3, and glucose remained stable over phases in both NHC and CHC. No group differences were observed between NHC and CHC for ghrelin, insulin, and glucose, while T3 was higher in CHC at BLE, OVU/active2, and LP/inactive. Individual profiles of leptin and ghrelin concentrations across MC and HC phases are presented in Figure 1.

3.2. Nutritional Intake and Energy Avalability

Table 3 summarizes the energy and macronutrient intake analyzed from the dietary logs as well as the energy expenditure analyzed from training logs. The mean EI, EEE, and EA were similar between phases and there were no significant differences observed in EI or macronutrient intake (CHO, PROT, and FAT) over MC or HC. At BLE and LP/inactive, however, statistical trends for higher CHO in CHC in comparison to NHC were observed (p = 0.068 and p = 0.069, respectively). EA was significantly higher in CHC than NHC at LP/inactive (p = 0.017). Furthermore, there was a trend for higher EA at FP/active 1 (p = 0.052), and OVU/active2 (p = 0.063).

3.3. Body Mass and Cravings

In NHC, a trend for body mass fluctuation was observed (p = 0.055), however, post-hoc tests did not reveal any significant differences between MC phases. In CHC, the body mass fluctuated significantly (p = 0.017) with post hoc tests revealing a small, but statistically significant increase (0.4 ± 0.1 kg, p = 0.028) from BLE to the inactive phase. Individual profiles of body mass across MC and HC phases are presented in Figure 2.
In NHC, 19%, 25%, 25%, and 50% of the participants reported food cravings at BLE, FP, OVU, and LP, respectively. Whereas, in CHC, 67%, 78%, 56%, and 44% of the participants reported food cravings at BLE, active1, active2, and inactive, respectively. Interestingly, NHC had significantly fewer cravings than CHC at BLE (p = 0.022), and at FP/active1 (p = 0.015). No significant with-in group fluctuations in cravings across the MC or HC were observed.

3.4. Associations

EI and EA were not associated with metabolic hormones or sex hormones. When NHC and CHC were pooled, significant negative associations were observed between ghrelin and leptin at BLE (ρ =−0.465 p = 0.022), at FP/active1 (ρ =0.507, p = 0.011), at OVU/active2 (ρ =−0.631, p < 0.00), and at LP/inactive (ρ =−0.428, p = 0.042). As expected, body fat % correlated with average leptin (ρ =0.531, p = 0.011).

4. Discussion

The purpose of this investigation was to examine the effects of MC and HC phase (endogenous and exogenous hormones) on EI and metabolic hormones in recreational athletes. Of the measured hormones associated with metabolism, only leptin fluctuated significantly during the MC in eumenorrheic women. These alterations in leptin concentrations, however, did not correlate with changes in E2 or P4. In women using combined HC, the HC phase did not alter metabolic hormones, while sex hormone concentrations also remained stable. No significant alterations in EI or EA were observed in either group with respect to the MC or HC phase. These findings suggest that neither MC nor HC phase, on average, alters ad libitum EI, however, it should be emphasized that large inter-individual differences were observed within our data.
We demonstrated a small but significant elevation in leptin during OVU compared to BLE and FP, a finding that is in line with previous research [10,23,24,25] although it is important to note that this finding is not consistent [26,27,28]. Ajala et al. (2013) suggested that several factors determining leptin expression may account for varying concentrations across the MC phases, including the regulatory properties of ovarian steroid hormones [24]. Lin et al. (1999), on the other hand, reported no significant associations between E2, P4, and leptin in any MC phase [27]. Although some studies have suggested that leptin parallels concentrations of progesterone [10,23], we did not observe this phenomena. Higher concentrations of leptin around OVU and during the LP, however, may be supported by the documented existence of leptin receptors in ovaries, follicles, and the corpus luteum [29]. The ability to compare data between studies is limited by methodological variances such as differences in blood assays and procedures used for the verification of MC phases. In the present study, procedures for MC phase identification were performed according to current recommendations for best practice [21]. Meanwhile, it is notable that relatively large inter-individual variation in hormonal concentrations, as reported in previous studies, was also present in our study. As expected, we found that leptin was associated with the fat % of the participants. Nevertheless, regardless of changes in body mass across the MC, the fat mass and EI of subjects remained statistically unaltered across the MC. It can be assumed that the significant change in leptin in NHC were not due to dramatic energy imbalances. Hence, changes in leptin might be explained by other mechanisms, such as the above-mentioned post-ovulatory changes. A variation in leptin was not observed in CHC.
There was a statistical trend for phase in ghrelin in NHC, where the lowest concentrations were observed at OVU. A similar non-significant decrease at mid-cycle was observed by Šramkóvá et al. (2015) [30]. As ghrelin and leptin have opposite roles in the control of satiety, this trend warrants more research. Although no studies, to date, have demonstrated a relationship between ghrelin and the MC in healthy women, an interplay between ghrelin and sex hormones cannot be completely ruled out. Exogenous E2 and P4, in the form of HC, increased ghrelin in women suffering from polycystic ovarian syndrome [31], while exogenous E2 has been shown to increase ghrelin in postmenopausal women [32]. Interestingly, HC use has not been demonstrated to influence ghrelin in healthy young women [33], a finding in agreement with the results of this study. Again, it is essential to consider the methodological discrepancies between studies. In line with our methods, some researchers have assessed total ghrelin [30,31], while others have assessed acylated ghrelin (AG) and unacylated ghrelin (UnAG) separately [15]. AG seems to have greater significance with regards to appetite stimulation, while total ghrelin reflects mainly UnAG, representing as much as 90 % of total plasma concentration [34]. Due to the sample collection in this study, total ghrelin was assessed, thus our results cannot be directly compared to all previous findings.
A phase effect of the MC or HC on fasting insulin, glucose or T3 was not observed, which is mostly in agreement with the existing literature. Only insulin has been shown to vary across the MC [35,36]. It is noteworthy to consider that the majority of the studies investigating the relationship between glucose metabolism and the MC have tested insulin sensitivity and glucose tolerance, with very few assessing fasting concentrations, as in the present study. Interestingly, T3 was significantly higher in CHC compared to NHC at all measurement points except at FP/active1. Although the difference between EA was statistically significant only at LP/inactive, EA was slightly higher in CHC than NHC throughout the investigation, which might explain the differences between groups in T3 concentrations in [37]. Indeed, HC use appears to increase T3 concentrations [38].
On average, EI, EEE, and EA remained relatively stable over the MC and HC. Furthermore, no changes in macronutrient preference was detected between phases or groups. As such, our results do not offer compelling evidence to indicate that dietary intake changes markedly over the course of a single MC or HC. Therefore, this study suggests that eumenorrheic recreationally active women are not more vulnerable to MC phase based perturbations in their habitual eating behavior compared to their counterparts that have a more stable hormonal milieu due to HC use. Previous laboratory-based interventions and cross-sectional observations of low EA have reported effects on several metabolic hormones including decreased triiodothyronine (T3), leptin, and insulin [39,40]. It is important to acknowledge that energy requirements are not only affected by resting metabolic rate and dietary intake, but also by EEE, and thus EA may better describe the nutritional status of highly active participants than EI alone. Considering the present results, researchers should not worry about the inclusion of women in research due to potential changes in EI, EEE or EA over the MC or HC, although it is worth remembering that a significant fluctuation may occur on an individual level. Likewise, it may be important to acknowledge that in a physically active population, such as the one investigated in this study, the use of HC does not appear to be a significant factor modulating leptin and ghrelin concentrations, although T3 concentrations, on average, were higher in women using HC.
We observed an increase in body mass from BLE to the inactive phase in CHC. Meanwhile, no significant fluctuations were detected in NHC. Again, it is notable that relatively large inter-individual variations were observed in both groups. Previous studies examining changes in body mass across the HC phase are sparse, and to our knowledge there are not any studies that have reported a similar increase in body mass during the HC cycle [41,42]. Meanwhile, most previous studies investigating body mass changes across the MC are in line with our study and indicate a lack of evidence to support a significant fluctuation of body mass across the MC in athletic women [41,43,44]. Nevertheless, it has been suggested that body mass increases from the FP to the LP in athletic women, which has been explained by fluid retention caused by higher aldosterone concentrations [45] or increased food consumption in the LP [46]. Nevertheless, the effect of the MC and HC on body mass has not been fully elucidated [47].
Our study demonstrated that women in CHC experience more cravings compared to NHC during the first half of the cycle (BLE; active1/FP), as well as a tendency for women in NHC to report more cravings at LP compared to other phases. These findings must be interpreted with caution, given the inconsistent pattern they exhibit. There is some evidence suggesting that MC-related cravings are often experienced in the LP [48] reflecting the orexigenic effects of progesterone [2]. However, previous studies have not observed any differences in cravings between HC users and non-users [49]. It is crucial to note that the concept of cravings comprises a sum of complex factors including social and psychological dimensions along with hormones, thus these findings do not allow for strong conclusions. Taken together, the present study demonstrated between-group differences in food cravings and T3 between MC and CHC. These results may suggest a minor effect of HC use on cravings and EA, however further exploration with a larger study population is needed.
The current study had several limitations, including self-reporting of dietary and training information, as well as the limited number of participants. However, nearly all studies using questionnaires suffer from such constraints. It is well known, that investigation of EI is sensitive to numerous confounding factors, such as personality traits [50] and eating behaviors [51]. Participants’ conventional eating patterns and attitudes towards nutrition may have obscured associations between the MC or HC cycles and dietary intake. Discussion regarding the influence of EI, macronutrient intake, and EA on training responses and/or performance, where the possible influence of MC and HC phase are taken into consideration may be warranted, however, this goes beyond the scope of the present article. We acknowledge these shortcomings, but also emphasize the strengths of the present study. To our knowledge, there are no studies examining the association between EA and metabolic hormones with respect to the MC and HC phase, as such, this pilot study appears to be novel in this area of research. All of the participants were highly motivated to provide researchers with accurate information and the research team took great care to interact with the participants throughout the study by encouraging their full and complete compliance with the protocols. Finally, our study included four time-points rather than the usual two used in many studies. We also incorporated a prospective determination of MC phases, as well as retrospective confirmation of both MC and HC phases according to the current recommendations for best practice [21].

5. Conclusions

The MC phase can have a small but significant effect on leptin concentrations although neither MC nor HC phase appeared to affect other metabolic hormones measured in the present study. Furthermore, EI, EEE, and EA did not change over the MC or HC phase suggesting that MC or HC phase does not alter ad libitum EI or EA in recreational athletes. This finding also indicates that monitoring of EI, EEE, and EA in each phase of the MC or HC may not be necessary in e.g., longitudinal training studies. It should be acknowledged that a large inter-individual variation within our data may limit the interpretation of our results, although this variation also underscores the importance of considering the individual rather than group means in practice.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.K.I. and A.C.H.; methodology, I.L. and A.K.; formal analysis, J.K.I. and R.S.T.-M.; investigation, J.K.I., I.L. and A.K.; resources, H.K.; writing—original draft preparation, J.K.I., I.L. and R.S.T.-M.; writing—review and editing, A.K., A.C.H., H.K. and R.S.T.-M.; visualization, R.S.T.-M.; supervision, H.K.; funding acquisition, J.K.I. and H.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Urheiluopistosäätiö and The Emil Aaltonen foundation.

Institutional Review Board Statement

The study was conducted according to the guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki, and approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of the University of Jyväskylä.

Informed Consent Statement

Informed consent was obtained from all subjects involved in the study.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on reasonable request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge and sincerely thank our laboratory technicians Jukka Hintikka and Risto Puurtinen for their assistance with blood sample collection and analysis. We also thank our participants for their commitment and willingness to share their menstrual cycle and hormonal contraceptive data with us. Finally, we thank our Bachelor’s students for their attention to detail and hard work during data collection.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fehring, R.J.; Schneider, M.; Raviele, K. Variability in the phases of the menstrual cycle. JOGNN-J. Obstet. Gynecol. Neonatal Nurs. 2006, 35, 376–384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Hirschberg, A.L. Sex hormones, appetite and eating behaviour in women. Maturitas 2012, 71, 248–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Elliott-Sale, K.J.; Hicks, K.M. Hormonal-based contraception and the exercising female. In The Exercising Female; Routledge: London, UK, 2018; pp. 30–43. Available online: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/hormonal-based-contraception-exercising-female-kirsty-elliott-sale-kirsty-marie-hicks/e/10.4324/9781351200271-4 (accessed on 12 March 2021).
  4. Eck, L.H.; Bennett, A.G.; Egan, B.M.; Ray, J.W.; Mitchell, C.O.; Smith, M.A.; Klesges, R.C. Differences in macronutrient selections in users and nonusers of an oral contraceptive. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 1997, 65, 419–424. Available online: https://0-academic-oup-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/ajcn/article/65/2/419-424/4655349 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Wallace, R.B.; Heiss, G.; Burrows, B.; Graves, K. Contrasting diet and body mass among users and nonusers of oral contraceptives and exogenous estrogens: The lipid research clinics program prevalence study. Am. J. Epidemiol. 1987, 125, 854–859. Available online: https://0-academic-oup-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/aje/article/124178/CONTRASTING (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Procter-Gray, E.; Cobb, K.L.; Crawford, S.L.; Bachrach, L.K.; Chirra, A.; Sowers, M.; Greendale, G.A.; Nieves, J.W.; Kent, K.; Kelsey, J.L. Effect of Oral Contraceptives on Weight and Body Composition in Young Female Runners. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2008, 40, 1205–1212. Available online: https://journals.lww.com/00005768-200807000-00002 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  7. Landersoe, S.K.; Forman, J.L.; Petersen, K.B.; Larsen, E.C.; Nøhr, B.; Hvidman, H.W.; Nielsen, H.S.; Andersen, A.N. Ovarian reserve markers in women using various hormonal contraceptives. Eur. J. Contracept. Reprod. Heal. Care 2020, 25, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Cummings, D.E.; Purnell, J.Q.; Frayo, R.S.; Schmidova, K.; Wisse, B.E.; Weigle, D.S. A Preprandial Rise in Plasma Ghrelin Levels Suggests a Role in Meal Initiation in Humans. Diabetes 2001, 50, 1714–1719. Available online: www.diabetes.org/diabetes (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  9. Klok, M.D.; Jakobsdottir, S.; Drent, M.L. The role of leptin and ghrelin in the regulation of food intake and body weight in humans: A review. Obes. Rev. 2007, 8, 21–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Ahrens, K.; Mumford, S.L.; Schliep, K.C.; Kissell, K.A.; Perkins, N.J.; Wactawski-Wende, J.; Schisterman, E.F. Serum leptin levels and reproductive function during the menstrual cycle. In American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology; Mosby Inc.: St. Louis, MO, USA, 2014; Volume 210, pp. 248.e1–248.e9. [Google Scholar]
  11. Rafique, N.; Salem, A.M.; Latif, R.; ALSheikh, M.H. Serum leptin level across different phases of menstrual cycle in normal weight and overweight/obese females. Gynecol. Endocrinol. 2018, 34, 601–604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Krishnan, S.; Tryon, R.R.; Horn, W.F.; Welch, L.; Keim, N.L. Estradiol, SHBG and leptin interplay with food craving and intake across the menstrual cycle. Physiol. Behav. 2016, 165, 304–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Riad-Gabriel, M.G.; Jinagouda, S.D.; Sharma, A.; Boyadjian, R.; Saad, M.F. Changes in plasma leptin during the menstrual cycle. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1998, 139, 528–531. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/9849818/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  14. Matson, C.A.; Wiater, M.F.; Kuijper, J.L.; Weigle, D.S. Synergy between leptin and cholecystokinin (CCK) to control daily caloric intake. Peptides 1997, 18, 1275–1278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Dafopoulos, K.; Sourlas, D.; Kallitsaris, A.; Pournaras, S.; Messinis, I.E. Blood ghrelin, resistin, and adiponectin concentrations during the normal menstrual cycle. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 92, 1389–1394. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18829017/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. St-Pierre, D.H.; Karelis, A.D.; Cianflone, K.; Conus, F.; Mignault, D.; Rabasa-Lhoret, R.; St-Onge, M.; Tremblay-Lebeau, A.; Poehlman, E.T. Relationship between Ghrelin and Energy Expenditure in Healthy Young Women. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2004, 89, 5993–5997. Available online: https://0-academic-oup-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/jcem/article/89/12/5993/2844263 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  17. Loucks, A.B.; Kiens, B.; Wright, H.H. Energy availability in athletes. J. Sports Sci. 2011, 29 (Suppl. S1), S7–S15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Logue, D.; Madigan, S.M.; Delahunt, E.; Heinen, M.; Mc Donnell, S.J.; Corish, C.A. Low Energy Availability in Athletes: A Review of Prevalence, Dietary Patterns, Physiological Health, and Sports Performance. Sports Med. 2018, 48, 73–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Koehler, K.; Williams, N.I.; Mallinson, R.J.; Southmayd, E.A.; Allaway, H.C.M.; De Souza, M.J. Low resting metabolic rate in exercise-associated amenorrhea is not due to a reduced proportion of highly active metabolic tissue compartments. Am. J. Physiol. Metab. 2016, 311, E480–E487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Melin, A.; Tornberg, Å.B.; Skouby, S.; Faber, J.; Ritz, C.; Sjödin, A.; Sundgot-Borgen, J. The LEAF questionnaire: A screening tool for the identification of female athletes at risk for the female athlete triad. Br. J. Sports Med. 2014, 48, 540–545. Available online: http://0-bjsm-bmj-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  21. Elliott-Sale, K.J.; Ross, E.; Burden, R.; Hicks, K. The BASES Expert Statement on Conducting and Implementing Female Athlete-Based Research. Sport Exerc. Sci. 2020, 65, 6–7. [Google Scholar]
  22. Ainsworth, B.E.; Haskell, W.L.; Herrmann, S.D.; Meckes, N.; Bassett, D.R.; Tudor-Locke, C.; Greer, J.L.; Vezina, J.; Whitt-Glover, M.C.; Leon, A.S. 2011 compendium of physical activities: A second update of codes and MET values. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2011, 43, 1575–1581. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21681120/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Hardie, L.; Trayhurn, P.; Abramovich, D.; Fowler, P. Circulating leptin in women: A longitudinal study in the menstrual cycle and during pregnancy. Clin. Endocrinol. 1997, 47, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Ajala, O.M.; Ogunro, P.S.; Elusanmi, G.F.; Ogunyemi, O.E.; Bolarinde, A.A. Changes in serum leptin during phases of menstrual cycle of fertile women: Relationship to age groups and fertility. Int. J. Endocrinol. Metab. 2013, 11, 27–33. Available online: https://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pmc/articles/PMC3693651/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  25. Wunder, D.M.; Yared, M.; Bersinger, N.A.; Widmer, D.; Kretschmer, R.; Birkhäuser, M.H. Serum leptin and C-reactive protein levels in the physiological spontaneous menstrual cycle in reproductive age women. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 2006, 155, 137–142. Available online: www.eje-online.org (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Teirmaa, T.; Luukkaa, V.; Rouru, J.; Koulu, M.; Huupponen, R. Correlation between circulating leptin and luteinizing hormone during the menstrual cycle in normal-weight women. Eur. J. Endocrinol. 1998, 139, 190–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Lin, K.C. Changes of circulating leptin levels during normal menstrual cycle: Relationship to estradiol and progesterone. Kaohsiung J. Med. Sci. 1999, 15, 597–602. Available online: https://europepmc.org/article/med/10603707 (accessed on 12 March 2021).
  28. Stock, S.M.; Sande, E.M.; Bremme, K.A. Leptin levels vary significantly during the menstrual cycle, pregnancy, and in vitro fertilization treatment: Possible relation to estradiol. Fertil. Steril. 1999, 72, 657–662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Hausman, G.J.; Barb, C.R.; Lents, C.A. Leptin and reproductive function. Biochimie 2012, 94, 2075–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Šrámková, M.; Dušková, M.; Vítků, J.; Vçelák, J.; Matucha, P.; Bradnová, O.; De Cordeiro, J.; Stárka, L. Levels of adipokines and some steroids during the menstrual cycle. Physiol. Res. 2015, 64, S147–S154. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26680475/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  31. Saǧsöz, N.; Orbak, Z.; Noyan, V.; Yücel, A.; Uçar, B.; Yildiz, L. The effects of oral contraceptives including low-dose estrogen and drospirenone on the concentration of leptin and ghrelin in polycystic ovary syndrome. Fertil. Steril. 2009, 92, 660–666. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18973889/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  32. Kellokoski, E.; Pöykkö, S.M.; Karjalainen, A.H.; Ukkola, O.; Heikkinen, J.; Kesäniemi, Y.A.; Hörkkö, S. Estrogen Replacement Therapy Increases Plasma Ghrelin Levels. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2005, 90, 2954–2963. Available online: https://0-academic-oup-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/jcem/article/90/5/2954/2836983 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  33. Dafopoulos, K.; Chalvatzas, N.; Kosmas, G.; Kallitsaris, A.; Pournaras, S.; Messinis, I.E. The effect of estrogens on plasma ghrelin concentrations in women. J. Endocrinol. Invest. 2010, 33, 109–112. Available online: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/20348837/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  34. Gortan Cappellari, G.; Barazzoni, R. Ghrelin forms in the modulation of energy balance and metabolism. Eat. Weight Disord. 2019, 24, 997–1013. Available online: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s40519-018-0599-6 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Hackney, A.C.; Cyren, H.C.; Brammeier, M.; Sharp, R.L. Effects of the menstrual cycle on insulin-glucose at rest and in response to exercise. Biol. Sport 1993, 10, 73–81. [Google Scholar]
  36. Yeung, E.H.; Zhang, C.; Mumford, S.L.; Ye, A.; Trevisan, M.; Chen, L.; Browne, R.W.; Wactawski-Wende, J.; Schisterman, E.F. Longitudinal Study of Insulin Resistance and Sex Hormones over the Menstrual Cycle: The BioCycle Study. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab. 2010, 95, 5435–5442. Available online: https://academic.oup.com/jcem/article-lookup/doi/10.1210/jc.2010-0702 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  37. Loucks, A.B.; Heath, E.M. Induction of low-T3 syndrome in exercising women occurs at a threshold of energy availability. Am. J. Physiol. Regul. Integr. Comp. Physiol. 1994, 266, R817–R823. Available online: https://0-journals-physiology-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/doi/abs/10.1152/ajpregu.1994.266.3.R817 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Wiegratz, I.; Kutschera, E.; Lee, J.H.; Moore, C.; Mellinger, U.; Winkler, U.H.; Kuhl, H. Effect of four different oral contraceptives on various sex hormones and serum-binding globulins. Contraception 2003, 67, 25–32. Available online: http://0-www-sciencedirect-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/science/article/pii/S0010782402004365 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  39. Dipla, K.; Kraemer, R.R.; Constantini, N.W.; Hackney, A.C. Relative energy deficiency in sports (RED-S): Elucidation of endocrine changes affecting the health of males and females. Hormones 2020, 20, 35–47. Available online: https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.1007/s42000-020-00214-w (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  40. Elliott-Sale, K.J.; Tenforde, A.S.; Parziale, A.L.; Holtzman, B.; Ackerman, K.E. Endocrine Effects of Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport. Int. J. Sport Nutr. Exerc. Metab. 2018, 28, 335–349. Available online: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/30008240 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  41. Vaiksaar, S.; Jurimae, J.; Maestu, J.; Purge, P.; Kalytka, S.; Shakhlina, L.; Jurimae, T. No effect of menstrual cycle phase on fuel oxidation during exercise in rowers. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2011, 111, 1027–1034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Rael, B.; Romero-Parra, N.; Alfaro-Magallanes, V.M.; Barba-Moreno, L.; Cupeiro, R.; Janse de Jonge, X.; Peinado, A.B. Body Composition Over the Menstrual and Oral Contraceptive Cycle in Trained Females. Int. J. Sports Physiol. Perform. 2020, 16, 1–7. Available online: http://0-journals-humankinetics-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/view/journals/ijspp/16/3/article-p375.xml (accessed on 12 March 2021).
  43. Lebrun, C.M. Effect of the Different Phases of the Menstrual Cycle and Oral Contraceptives on Athletic Performance. Sport. Med. Eval. Res. Exerc. Sci. Sport. Med. 1993, 16, 400–430. Available online: http://0-www-ncbi-nlm-nih-gov.brum.beds.ac.uk/pubmed/8303141 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  44. Tsampoukos, A.; Peckham, E.A.; James, R.; Nevill, M.E. Effect of menstrual cycle phase on sprinting performance. Eur. J. Appl. Physiol. 2010, 109, 659–667. Available online: https://0-link-springer-com.brum.beds.ac.uk/article/10.1007/s00421-010-1384-z (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Reilly, T. The menstrual cycle and human performance: An overview. Biol. Rhythm Res. 2000, 31, 29–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Pliner, P.; Fleming, A.S. Food intake, body weight, and sweetness preferences over the menstrual cycle in humans. Physiol. Behav. 1983, 30, 663–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Carmichael, M.A.; Thomson, R.L.; Moran, L.J.; Wycherley, T.P. The Impact of Menstrual Cycle Phase on Athletes’ Performance: A Narrative Review. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18, 1667. Available online: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/4/1667 (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
  48. Davidsen, L.; Vistisen, B.; Astrup, A. Impact of the menstrual cycle on determinants of energy balance: A putative role in weight loss attempts. Int. J. Obes. 2007, 31, 1777–1785. Available online: www.gw.cs.nsw.gov.au/csls/RPAH/ (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  49. Tucci, S.A.; Murphy, L.E.; Boyland, E.J.; Dye, L.; Halford, J.C.G. Oral contraceptive effects on food choice during the follicular and luteal phases of the menstrual cycle. A laboratory based study. Appetite 2010, 55, 388–392. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Kipnis, V.; Midthune, D.; Freedman, L.; Bingham, S.; Day, N.E.; Riboli, E.; Ferrari, P.; Carroll, R.J. Bias in dietary-report instruments and its implications for nutritional epidemiology. Public Health Nutr. 2002, 5, 915–923. Available online: https://0-www-cambridge-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/core (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Asbeck, I.; Mast, M.; Bierwag, A.; Westenhöfer, J.; Acheson, K.; Müller, M. Severe underreporting of energy intake in normal weight subjects: Use of an appropriate standard and relation to restrained eating. Public Health Nutr. 2002, 5, 683–690. Available online: https://0-www-cambridge-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/core (accessed on 12 March 2021). [CrossRef]
Endocrines 02 00008 g001 550
Figure 1. Individual profiles for changes in ghrelin and leptin concentrations across MC phases in eumenorrheic women not using hormonal contraception (NHC, panels (A,C)) and across HC phases in women using hormonal contraception (CHC, panels (B,D)). Leptin was significantly elevated from bleeding to ovulation and follicular phase to ovulation in NHC. * = p < 0.05. BLE: bleeding; FP: mid follicular phase; OVU: ovulation; LP: mid luteal phase.
Figure 1. Individual profiles for changes in ghrelin and leptin concentrations across MC phases in eumenorrheic women not using hormonal contraception (NHC, panels (A,C)) and across HC phases in women using hormonal contraception (CHC, panels (B,D)). Leptin was significantly elevated from bleeding to ovulation and follicular phase to ovulation in NHC. * = p < 0.05. BLE: bleeding; FP: mid follicular phase; OVU: ovulation; LP: mid luteal phase.
Endocrines 02 00008 g001
Endocrines 02 00008 g002 550
Figure 2. Individual profiles for changes in body mass across MC phases in eumenorrheic women not using hormonal contraception (NHC) and across HC phases in women using hormonal contraception (CHC). BLE: bleeding; FP: mid follicular phase; OVU: ovulation; LP: mid luteal phase. Body mass was significantly elevated from bleeding to inactive in CHC. * = p < 0.05.
Figure 2. Individual profiles for changes in body mass across MC phases in eumenorrheic women not using hormonal contraception (NHC) and across HC phases in women using hormonal contraception (CHC). BLE: bleeding; FP: mid follicular phase; OVU: ovulation; LP: mid luteal phase. Body mass was significantly elevated from bleeding to inactive in CHC. * = p < 0.05.
Endocrines 02 00008 g002
Table
Table 1. Participant information. NHC: Women not using hormonal contraception; CHC: Women using hormonal contraception; LEAF-Q: Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire. Results are presented as mean ± SD.
Table 1. Participant information. NHC: Women not using hormonal contraception; CHC: Women using hormonal contraception; LEAF-Q: Low Energy Availability in Females Questionnaire. Results are presented as mean ± SD.
NHC (n = 15)CHC (n = 9)
Age (years)26 ± 423 ± 2
Body mass (kg)67.6 ± 6.561.0 ± 4.3
Height (m)1.67 ± 0.061.70 ± 0.06
Body fat (%)22.1 ± 6.719.5 ± 2.8
LEAF-Q (score)4.5 ± 2.15.7 ± 1.8
Table
Table 2. Serum hormone and glucose concentrations across the measurement points BLE: bleeding; FP: mid follicular phase; OVU: ovulation; LP: mid luteal phase; E2: Estradiol; P4: Progesterone; T3: Tri-iodothyronine. Values are presented as mean ± SD.
Table 2. Serum hormone and glucose concentrations across the measurement points BLE: bleeding; FP: mid follicular phase; OVU: ovulation; LP: mid luteal phase; E2: Estradiol; P4: Progesterone; T3: Tri-iodothyronine. Values are presented as mean ± SD.
GroupBLEFP/Active1OVU/Active2LP/InactivePhase
E2 (pmol·L−1)NHC290 ± 140560 ± 390 ** 690 ± 500 ** 650 ± 240 ** p < 0.001
CHC300 ± 270190 ± 140 aa220 ± 230 aa190 ± 110 aaap = 0.435
P4 (nmol·L−1)NHC2.0 ± 1.71.0 ± 0.54.1 ± 2.7 *,++15.0 ± 8.9 **,++,##p = 0.001
CHC1.1 ± 0.51.0 ± 0.51.1 ± 1.0 a1.2 ± 1.0 aap = 0.239
Leptin (ng·L−1)NHC6.8 ± 4.07.2 ± 5.48.5 ± 6.2 *,+7.8 ± 5.2p = 0.014
CHC8.3 ± 7.48.0 ± 7.88.2 ± 7.68.4 ± 6.5p = 0.706
Ghrelin (ng·L−1)NHC238 ± 72247 ± 68210 ± 75228 ± 74p = 0.089
CHC211 ± 106208 ± 101217 ± 138212 ± 136p = 0.352
Insulin (mIU·L−1)NHC2.8 ± 1.72.5 ± 1.73.8 ± 3.63.0 ± 2.6p = 0.183
CHC2.9 ± 2.93.4 ± 2.84.2 ± 3.02.9 ± 2.4p = 0.376
T3 (pmol·L−1)NHC4.9 ± 0.44.6 ± 0.74.9 ± 0.65.0 ± 0.7p = 0.119
CHC5.6 ± 0.7 aa5.4 ± 0.95.6 ± 0.9 a6.2 ± 1.0 aa p = 0.062
Glucose (nmol∙L−1)NHC5.0 ± 0.35.1 ± 0.44.9 ± 0.54.9 ± 0.4p = 0.384
CHC4.8 ± 0.44.8 ± 0.54.9 ± 0.54.9 ± 0.3p = 0.519
Significant difference from BLE * = p < 0.05 and ** = p <0.01. Significant difference from FP + = p < 0.05 and ++ = p < 0.01. Significant difference from OVU ## = p < 0.01. Significant difference from NHC a = p < 0.05, aa = p < 0.01, and aaa = p < 0.001.
Table
Table 3. Nutritional intake and energy availability. BLE: bleeding; FP: mid follicular phase; OVU: ovulation; LP: mid luteal phase; EI: Energy intake; EEE: Exercise energy expenditure; EA: Energy availability; CHO: Carbohydrate intake; PROT: Protein intake; FAT: Fat intake across MC and HC phases. Values are presented as mean ± SD.
Table 3. Nutritional intake and energy availability. BLE: bleeding; FP: mid follicular phase; OVU: ovulation; LP: mid luteal phase; EI: Energy intake; EEE: Exercise energy expenditure; EA: Energy availability; CHO: Carbohydrate intake; PROT: Protein intake; FAT: Fat intake across MC and HC phases. Values are presented as mean ± SD.
GroupBLEFP/
Active1		OVU/
Active2		LP/
Inactive		Phase
EI (kcal·day−1)NHC2340 ± 6602340 ± 5402280 ± 5102270 ± 370p = 0.825
CHC2770 ± 5002470 ± 5102660 ± 7102510 ± 380p = 0.081
EEE (kcal·day−1)NHC325 ± 157342 ± 109372 ± 170361 ± 199p = 0.099
CHC248 ± 117326 ± 94.8251 ± 90251 ± 90p = 0.591
EA (kcal·kgFFM−1·day−1)NHC40.0 ± 11.139.9 ± 11.135.9 ± 9.037.6 ± 7.2p = 0.465
CHC42.9 ± 9.651.7 ± 11.449.4 ± 17.445.5 ± 5.4 ap = 0.054
CHO (g·day−1)NHC255 ± 80260 ± 77247 ± 67250 ± 55p = 0.896
CHC310 ± 60273 ± 61300 ± 91293 ± 44p = 0.506
PROT (g·day−1)NHC112 ± 40107 ± 30110 ± 27105 ± 31p = 0.873
CHC118 ± 39109 ± 27109 ± 30110 ± 36p = 0.072
FAT (g·day−1)NHC86 ± 2786 ± 3385 ± 2183 ± 19p = 0.992
CHC105 ± 3091 ± 29100 ± 3484 ± 18p = 0.102
Significant difference from CHC a = p < 0.05.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ihalainen, J.K.; Löfberg, I.; Kotkajuuri, A.; Kyröläinen, H.; Hackney, A.C.; Taipale-Mikkonen, R.S. Influence of Menstrual Cycle or Hormonal Contraceptive Phase on Energy Intake and Metabolic Hormones—A Pilot Study. Endocrines 2021, 2, 79-90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/endocrines2020008

AMA Style

Ihalainen JK, Löfberg I, Kotkajuuri A, Kyröläinen H, Hackney AC, Taipale-Mikkonen RS. Influence of Menstrual Cycle or Hormonal Contraceptive Phase on Energy Intake and Metabolic Hormones—A Pilot Study. Endocrines. 2021; 2(2):79-90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/endocrines2020008

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ihalainen, Johanna K., Ida Löfberg, Anna Kotkajuuri, Heikki Kyröläinen, Anthony C. Hackney, and Ritva S. Taipale-Mikkonen. 2021. "Influence of Menstrual Cycle or Hormonal Contraceptive Phase on Energy Intake and Metabolic Hormones—A Pilot Study" Endocrines 2, no. 2: 79-90. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/endocrines2020008

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop