Next Article in Journal / Special Issue
Modeling of Progressive Scouring of a Pier-on-Bank
Previous Article in Journal
Freeze-Thaw Behaviour of Post-Installed Bonded Anchors under Changing Climate Conditions
Previous Article in Special Issue
Eggshell and Walnut Shell in Unburnt Clay Blocks
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

New Models for the Properties of Warm Mix Asphalt with Sasobit

1
School of Civil Engineering, University of Science & Technology, Tehran 13114-16846, Iran
2
Civil and Mechanical Engineering Faculty, Curtin University, Bentley, WA 6102, Australia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Submission received: 5 February 2022 / Revised: 25 March 2022 / Accepted: 26 March 2022 / Published: 12 April 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Early Career Stars in Civil Engineering)

Abstract

:
Warm Mix Asphalt (WMA) is a set of technologies that uses additives to reduce binder viscosity and increase mixture workability, which provides a complete coating of aggregates at lower temperatures around 100 °C to 130 °C. Organic wax or Sasobit is one of the additives that can be used for this purpose. It reduces the viscosity at the melting point of the wax, which allows the production of asphalt mixes at lower temperatures. This attempt proposes new relationships for elastic modulus, indirect tensile strength (in dry and wet conditions), dynamic modulus, fatigue, and rutting resistance of WMA asphalt samples with various Sasobit percentages. Findings show that Sasobit improves modulus of elasticity, dynamic modulus, and rutting resistance. However, it lessens the tensile strength slightly. Although Sasobit enhances the flexural stiffness, it drops the number of loading cycles, which means lower fatigue resistance. Results also showed that at 20 °C and 10 Hz frequency, the resilient modulus, dynamic modulus, and flexural stiffness of WMA improved 53%, 27%, and 39%, respectively, compared with HMA. Rutting resistance at 60 °C improves 226% in WMA with 6% Sasobit compared to the HMA mix.

1. Introduction

The asphalt industry has regarded the sustainability concept with continuous efforts to reduce greenhouse gas emissions (GHG) and fossil fuel consumption [1,2,3]. Hot mix asphalt (HMA) is generally produced in the mixing plants at temperatures ranging from 150 to 170 °C. High temperatures are necessary to dry and uniformly coat the aggregates and provide the desired workability during placing and compaction of the mix. Warm mix asphalt (WMA) with lower emissions is produced at temperatures 20 °C to 40 °C lower than the temperatures required for HMA. WMA has become an increasingly viable option due to its merits in sustainability and mechanical properties [4]. Various types of WMA are vital in road construction, as they can contribute to saving costs, carbon footprint, and natural resources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions [5,6,7].
Sasobit is one of the modifiers or additives for making WMA. Sasobit is a synthetic wax made up of long-chain hydrocarbons. This material is obtained by polymerization during the Fischer–Tropsch process. It is used as a modifier in hot asphalt mix due to reduced temperature in the production and conduction of mixtures [1,8]. Sasobit expands the plastic limit and increases the melting temperature range of asphalt binders [9]. The melting point of Sasobit is approximately 100 °C, and bitumen can be thoroughly mixed at temperatures above 116 °C. Above the melting point of the Sasobit, the wax liquefies. Thus, the viscosity of the bitumen drops significantly and allows the production temperature of the asphalt mixture to reduce by 20–30 °C [10,11]. Below the melting temperatures, Sasobit forms a lattice structure in asphalt binder and provides better stability, according to field trial reports [12,13]. Furthermore, the use of Sasobit in the mix reduces waste materials and pollution caused by other products. Zhao and Guo [14] evaluated the workability of WMA containing Sasobit at different temperatures and frequencies in contrast with HMA.
The results showed that adding Sasobit to WMA reduced temperature up to 30 °C, and the workability of the WMA mix, which contained Sasobit, was as same as the HMA mix. Liu and Li [15] studied the performance of the WMA mixture modified with Sasobit at a low temperature. The results showed that the tensile strength reduces for both HMA and WMA at low temperatures, and thermal cracks rise with increasing Sasobit content. However, the increase in thermal cracks was negligible, which showed that adding Sasobit to mixtures at low temperatures had little effect on cracking resistance. Liu et al. [16] investigated the rutting resistance and moisture susceptibility of WMA containing Sasobit at low temperatures. Results showed Sasobit reduced mixing and compaction temperatures, improved workability, and rutting resistance, and had an insignificant effect on moisture susceptibility. The indirect tensile test results showed decreased WMAs tensile strength at low temperatures. In addition, adding Sasobit from 0 to 3% by weight of bitumen in the mixture increased the dynamic modulus by 18%. Raveesh et al. [17] examined using of Sasobit additive in WMA. In this study, Sasobit content was used 1 to 5% in the WMA mixture. The results showed that adding Sasobit to the mixture reduced the temperature of the asphalt mixture by up to 30%. Further, their experimental results show that Marshall’s stability values increased with the addition of 3% and 4% to the modified bitumen compared to the HMA. However, the Sasobit reduces the amount of Marshall flow. In addition, adding 1–5% Sasobit in WMA reduces ITS values for unconditional and conditional samples by about 14–19% and 20–36%, respectively. Sobhi et al. [18] examined the effect of Sasobit on the mechanical properties and durability of asphalt mixtures. In this study, 3% Sasobit (by weight of binder) was added to the mix. Then, its effects were evaluated with various experiments, such as dynamic creep, modulus of elasticity, indirect tensile strength, and semi-circular bending test. The results showed that adding Sasobit increased the stiffness of the mixtures and enhanced their performances while negatively affecting the moisture sensitivity of WMA. Moreover, experimental results showed that the mechanical properties and durability of asphalt mixtures improved with the addition of Sasobit.
This study aimed to study the mechanical properties, especially fatigue, rutting, and durability, of warm mix asphalt containing Sasobit by presenting new models. These applied models predict the mechanical parameters of WMA mixtures in terms of the weight percentage of Sasobit. In this study, the mechanical properties and durability of WMA with Sasobit were investigated versus HMA. For this purpose, mechanical properties, including indirect tensile strength, modulus of elasticity, dynamic modulus, fatigue resistance, and rutting with three different Sasobit percentages (1.5%, 3%, and 6%), were examined.

2. Materials and Samples

2.1. Materials

Three sizes of aggregates, including 10 mm, 7 mm, and 5mm from a local quarry, were used. Adhesion agent or filler was also lime for 1.4% of the total mix (Main Road Western Australia requirement). The particle size distribution of aggregates with a maximum nominal size of 10 mm was under MRWA 200.1-2012 [19] and is shown in Figure 1. In addition, the physical properties of aggregates are presented in Table 1. Binder class C320 (bitumen), popular in Australia, was used for the research. The properties are presented in Table 2. In this study, Sasobit was chosen as the modifier due reducing of temperature preparation and conduction of mixtures. Sasobit or wax is a fine, crystalline, long-chain, aliphatic hydrocarbon with a melting point range between 85 °C and 115 °C. Thus, the base asphalt binder was modified by adding 1.5, 3, and 6% of Sasobit by weight of the asphalt binder. An image of the Sasobit used in this study is shown in Figure 2.

2.2. Sample Preparation and Mixing Temperatures

In this study, bitumen was modified by adding 1.5%, 3%, and 6% Sasobit (by weight of the binder) at the temperature of 150 °C. In general, four types of bitumen samples are considered in this study. One base bitumen was used as a reference in the HMA mixture, and three Sasobit-modified binders with different weight percentages were used for WMA mixes.
Loose mix samples were produced in the laboratory according to the preparation of Asphalt Samples for Testing (AP T132/09). HMA aggregate was placed in the oven for drying at a temperature of 160 °C, attaining a mixing temperature of 155 °C. The bitumen was allowed to heat for three hours simultaneously with the aggregate, until it reached a temperature of 160 °C to comply with the required mixing temperatures. Then, the aggregate was dried in the oven at a temperature of 140 °C. This was to ensure the temperature of 135 °C for WMA mixes. The bitumen was allowed to heat for three hours simultaneously with the aggregate, until it reached a temperature of 160 °C. Immediately after the temperature required was reached, the bitumen (previously prepared with additive and lime) was added to the aggregates. Sasobit was melted at 120 °C and then mixed with enough hot bitumen to obtain a homogeneous mixture. HMA mix was conditioned to 150 °C, while WMA mixes were conditioned to 130 °C for one hour. Two ovens were used to ensure the temperatures were kept to the requirements, thus meaning the final test results were not affected. The last step of the mixing process was to mix all the pre-heated aggregates with the binder and Sasobit. This process was achieved with the use of a Hobart mixer.
Figure 3 shows the viscosity results at different temperatures for C320 bitumen mixed with Sasobit. As shown in Figure 3, the mixing and compaction temperatures for the unmodified mixture were 160 and 155 °C, respectively. However, the modified mixture with Sasobit had the mixing and compaction temperature of 135 °C [20]. For mixture preparation, Sasobit was melted at 120 °C and added to the bitumen with a temperature of 150 °C. Next, it was mixed with all the pre-heated aggregates with the modified binder [21]. The binder properties shown in Table 3. The rolling thin film oven (RTFO) test results are presented in Table 4 following AS 2341.10 [22].

3. Experimental Methods

3.1. Resilient Modulus

The resilient modulus of the specimen was measured under indirect tensile cyclic loads using a universal testing machine (UTM 25) according to AS 2891.13.1-1995 methods [23]. The frequency and temperature used in this research are 10 Hz and 25 ± 5 °C, respectively. The samples used for resilient modulus testing were produced using the gyratory compactor (Servopac) [24].

3.2. Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS) and Moisture Sensitivity

TSR measures the stripping potential of an asphalt mix by measuring the strength of an unconditioned and conditioned specimen. For the investigation, testing was performed according to method AGPT/T232. MRWA specification 510 specifies limits for TSR testing of 850 kPa for an unconditioned specimen and 750 kPa for a conditioned specimen [25].

3.3. Dynamic Modulus

Dynamic modulus testing was carried out using the method AASHTO TP62-07 [26]. An asphalt mixture performance tester (AMPT) machine was used for testing, including an environmental chamber and a measuring system. Dynamic modulus values were tested at 4 °C, 20 °C, and 40 °C with a frequency of 0.1 Hz, 1 Hz, and 10 Hz to generate a master curve. Three laboratory samples (cylinders) were produced for each temperature, and a Servopac gyratory compactor was used for compaction to obtain air void of 5 ± 0.5% at a specific temperature. Strain gauges were fixed to the specimens and used to measure strain under sinusoidal conditions to calculate the dynamic modulus and phase angle data. The specimen was made with D = 100 mm and H = 150 mm [27].

3.4. Fatigue Test

Three beams were prepared for each control hot mix and Sasobit-modified mix. The test was conducted based on the Austroads method AGPT/233 at 20 °C with 10 Hz frequency and 400 µ strain, and the beam dimensions were 390 ± 5 mm length, 63.5 ± 5 mm horizontal width, and 50 ± 5 mm vertical depth [28].

3.5. Wheel Track Test

The wheel track test was performed according to the AGPT/T231 test [29]. The specimens were produced using a slab compactor, and all samples were compacted to the required 5 ± 1.0% air voids. The samples were conditioned for a minimum of 6 h at 58 °C, and rutting depths were measured at 10,000 cycles at 60 °C.

4. Results and Discussions

4.1. Resilient Modulus

The results of the elastic modulus are presented in Table 5 and Figure 4. In addition, the results clearly show that all WMA samples are within the typical values of modulus of elasticity for dense grade asphalt, as shown in Table 6 [30]. As can be seen from Figure 4, the resilient modulus value for WMA samples containing modified bitumen with Sasobit is higher than HMA control samples. The reason for this increase might be due to the interaction between the Sasobit crystals, which form a network and reduce the temperature of the bitumen, causing it to harden and stiffen the binder; the result is an increase in the resilient modulus of the asphalt mixture [18,31]. Figure 4 showed that the resilient modulus for WMA mixtures increased 0.4, 18.2, and 52.8% by the inclusion of 1.5, 3, and 6% of the Sasobit compared to the HMA, respectively. Hence, increasing the modulus of elasticity obtained from mixtures containing Sasobit can reduce the thickness of the asphalt layer, improve the strength of the mix against heavy traffic loads, and increase the pavement service life.
The correlation of the resilient modulus versus Sasobit percentages was attempted by nonlinear regression analysis. It is expressed as Equation (1) with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.99 ).
E W M A , S a E H M A = 1 1 0.036 S a 1.28
where S a is the percentage of Sasobit, which is used as the percentage by weight of bitumen in the WMA mixture. In Figure 5, the results of the predicting model were compared with other researcher’s studies (Sobhi et al. [18], Behroozikhah et al. [32], Ghuzlan and Ar’ar [33], and Behbahani et al. [34]). As can be seen from Figure 5, there is a good correlation between the results of the resilient modulus in the proposed model and other researchers’ studies.

4.2. Indirect Tensile Strength (ITS)

The results of the ITS experiment are presented in Figure 6 and Table 7 for both conditioned and unconditioned samples. Adding Sasobit to the asphalt mixture reduces ITS significantly for conditioned and unconditioned samples. Adding 1.5–6% of Sasobit reduces the ITS values by about 2.6–7.4% and 2.1–3.8% for conditioned and unconditioned mixtures, respectively. These indicate a higher moisture sensitivity of WMA containing Sasobit in contrast to HMA mixtures; based on the previous research on moisture sensitivity for WMA with Sasobit, this might be due to the adhesion reduction between binder and aggregate [35,36]. Furthermore, TSR results for different asphalt mixtures are presented in Table 7 and Figure 7. TSR values were significantly lower in WMA mixtures containing Sasobit compared to HMA although in higher percentages of Sasobit, the TSR of the samples was less reduced. As can be seen in Figure 7, an increase in Sasobit content showed a positive effect on TSR values. Moreover, the average TSR results for HMA and WMA show that all mixtures had enough moisture sensitivity, as they were more than the minimum of 80% as required in the standard. Sasobit can increase moisture sensitivity in asphalt mixtures by reducing the adhesion between aggregate and binder. Furthermore, the brittle behavior of the mixture containing Sasobit can change the fracture mechanism.
Nonlinear regression analyses were used to reach a normalized equation for the indirect tensile strength versus Sasobit percentages for both conditioned and unconditioned samples. They are expressed as Equations (2) and (3), respectively, with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.79   and   0.81 for conditioned and unconditioned samples, respectively).
f c o n , W M A , S a f c o n , H M A = 1 ( 1 + 0.033 s a 0.005 s a 2 )
f u n c o n , W M A , S a f u n c o n , H M A = 1 ( 1 + 0.022 s a 0.003 s a 2 )
For further validation of the proposed model for both conditioned and unconditioned samples, the results of the predicting model for the ITS compared in Figure 8 with other researcher’s studies that are mentioned in the literature (Raveesh et al. [17], Fakhri et al. [36], Gong et al. [31], and Goh et al. [37]). As can be seen from Figure 8, the results of the ITS in the proposed model are in agreement with other researchers’ studies.

4.3. Dynamic Modulus

The master curve parameters and master curve for each mixture are presented in Table 8 and Figure 9, respectively. Based on the results, it can be concluded that the mixture’s response, which is under cyclic loading conditions, is dependent on the temperature and frequency. The mean values of the dynamic modulus for the WMA samples containing Sasobit and HMA at different temperatures and frequencies are presented in Figure 9 and Table 8. As shown in Figure 10, the dynamic modulus decreases significantly with increasing temperature, while the dynamic modulus increases with increasing frequency. Additionally, it can be seen from Figure 10 and Table 9 that the dynamic modulus for WMA samples is higher than the HMA control samples. At 20 °C and 10 Hz frequency, the addition of 3% and 6% of Sasobit increases the dynamic modulus by 16.4% and 26.6%, respectively. However, the amount of 1.5% Sasobit in the modified WMA mixture reduces the dynamic modulus by 7.6%. The increase might be due to the presence of larger wax crystals in the asphalt bitumen containing Sasobit than reference bitumen [1,11]. Furthermore, adding Sasobit to the asphalt mixture lowers the bitumen temperature, makes the binder stiffen, and increases the dynamic modulus.f
The correlation of the dynamic modulus at 20 °C and 10 Hz frequency versus Sasobit percentages was attempted by nonlinear regression analysis, which is expressed as Equation (4) with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.88 ).
        E W M A , S a E H M A = 1 1 0.032 S a 1.14
Figure 11 compared the proposed model with Liu et al. [16] and Zelelew et al. [38]. As shown in Figure 11, the results of the dynamic modulus in the proposed model are in acceptable agreement with other researchers’ studies.

4.4. Flexural Stiffness

The results of fatigue resistance and initial flexural stiffness for both WMA and HMA samples are shown in Table 10.
As can be seen from Table 10, the average percentage of air voids in all samples is about 5%. In addition, the average fatigue life of HMA and WMA mixtures is shown in Figure 12. HMA control and WMA with 1.5% Sasobit had the best performance for fatigue resistance. Increasing the percentage of Sasobit in WMA improves the flexural stiffness but reduces the number of cycles because Sasobit makes asphalt mixtures more brittle. Hence, WMA samples had less fatigue resistance in comparison to HMA. As can be seen from Figure 12, WMA mixtures made with Sasobit have the highest initial flexural stiffness compared to the HMA control samples. Initial flexural stiffness values increased 17.5, 18.6, and 38.6% by adding 1.5, 3, and 6% Sasobit in WMA mixtures compared to HMA, respectively. Furthermore, as the number of cycles increases, the initial flexural stiffness in all mixes decreases, as shown in Figure 12.
Figure 13 shows a comparison between elastic modulus, dynamic modulus, and initial flexural stiffness for all samples. The addition of Sasobit to the asphalt mixture has a more significant effect on the dynamic modulus, so adding 6% of Sasobit to the WMA mixture increases the elastic modulus, initial flexural stiffness, and dynamic modulus by 26.6, 38.6, and 52.8% compared to the control HMA, respectively.
The correlation of the flexural stiffness for WMA mixtures versus Sasobit percentages was attempted by nonlinear regression analysis. It is expressed as Equation (5) with the coefficient of determination ( R 2 = 0.98 ).
S W M A , S a S H M A = 1 1 0.092 S a 0.6
Figure 14 compared the proposed model with Liu et al. [16] and Alinezhad and Sahaf [39]. As shown in Figure 14, there is a good correlation between the results of the flexural stiffness in the proposed model with other researchers’ studies.

4.5. Rutting

The results of the wheel track test for HMA and WMA are presented in Figure 15. As can be seen from Figure 15, the average rutting of specimens increases with the growing number of wheel passes while adding a high percentage of Sasobit in WMA (3% and 6% of Sasobit in this study) improves rutting. The reason can be due to the presence of larger wax crystals in the asphalt bitumen, which causes the formation of a lattice structure in the asphalt bitumen and creates better stability in mixtures, thus reducing the depth of the rutting.
The above results provide a better understanding of the benefits of an additive, such as Sasobit, to improve asphalt quality and increase the durability and sustainability of road material. There is much research to incorporate other by-products, such as waste plastic, with the help of other additives, such as nanoparticles, to offset their drawbacks. [40,41]. However, new prediction models are highly demanding to extrapolate design parameters out of laboratory testing conditions for asphalt or even base course layers [42,43,44,45].
With the help of new models for design modulus or fatigue, WMA mixes can now be applied with novel insights about their long-term properties.

5. Conclusions

In this study, Sasobit’s effect on the mechanical properties and durability of HMA and WMA in the laboratory were investigated by developing new models. Thus, mechanical properties, including indirect tensile strength, elastic modulus, dynamic modulus, fatigue, and rutting resistance with three different percentages of Sasobit (1.5%, 3%, and 6%), were evaluated. The results of this study can be summarized as follows:
  • Increasing the percentage of Sasobit increased the softening point of bitumen and viscosity and decreased the penetration point.
  • The resilient modulus value for WMA is higher than the HMA control sample. The modulus of elasticity values increases by 0.4%, 18%, and 53% by adding 1.5, 3, and 6% of Sasobit to mixtures, respectively.
  • TSR values were significantly lower in mixtures containing modified Sasobit bitumen than HMA. Adding 1.5–6% of Sasobit in WMA reduces the ITS values for the unconditional and conditional samples by about 2.6–4.7% and 2.8–3.1%, respectively.
  • The dynamic modulus values decrease significantly with increasing temperature, while increasing frequency improves dynamic modulus. At low temperatures, regardless of the frequency level, the dynamic modulus has the highest value in WMA with 6% Sasobit.
  • HMA control and WMA with 1.5% Sasobit had the best fatigue-resistance performance. Increasing the percentage of Sasobit in WMA increases the flexural stiffness but reduces the number of cycles due to fatigue. Initial bending stiffness values were obtained by adding 1.5, 3, and 6% of Sasobit in WMA mixtures to increase flexural stiffness 18, 19, and 39%, respectively, compared to the control HMA.
  • For rutting, the addition of Sasobit up to 1.5% does not have a considerable impact. However, higher Sasobit for 6% causes a significant rutting improvement due to formation of a lattice structure inside asphalt matrix.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.V.; formal analysis, M.R.H.; supervision, H.N.; writing—review & editing, A.R. (Alireza Rezagholilou) and A.R. (Ali Rigabadi). All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data available within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Jamshidi, A.; Hamzah, M.O.; You, Z. Performance of Warm Mix Asphalt containing Sasobit®: State-of-the-art. Constr. Build. Mater. 2013, 38, 530–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Man, J.; Yan, K.; Miao, Y.; Liu, Y.; Yang, X.; Diab, A.; You, L. 3D Spectral element model with a space-decoupling technique for the response of transversely isotropic pavements to moving vehicular loading. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Li, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wang, Z.; Wu, Y.; Dong, M.; Zhang, Y. Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical response of saturated asphalt pavement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 283, 122771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kheradmand, B.; Muniandy, R.; Hua, L.T.; Yunus, R.; Solouki, A. An overview of the emerging warm mix asphalt technology. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2012, 15, 79–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ayazi, M.J.; Moniri, A.; Barghabany, P. Moisture susceptibility of warm mixed-reclaimed asphalt pavement containing Sasobit and Zycotherm additives. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2017, 35, 890–895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cheraghian, G.; Falchetto, A.C.; You, Z.; Chen, S.; Kim, Y.S.; Westerhoff, J.; Moon, K.H.; Wistuba, M.P. Warm mix asphalt technology: An up to date review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 268, 122128. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Caputo, P.; Abe, A.A.; Loise, V.; Porto, M.; Calandra, P.; Angelico, R.; Rossi, C.O. The Role of Additives in Warm Mix Asphalt Technology: An Insight into Their Mechanisms of Improving an Emerging Technology. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 1202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Damm, K.L. Asphalt flow improvers—A new technology for reducing mixing temperature of asphalt concrete mixes with high restistance against permanent deformation. In Proceedings of the Sixth International RILEM Symposium on Performance Testing and Evaluation of Bituminous Materials, Zurich, Switzerland, 14–16 April 2003; p. 520. [Google Scholar]
  9. Wasiuddin, N.; Saltibus, N.; Mohammad, L. Effects of a Wax-Based Warm Mix Additive on Cohesive Strengths of Asphalt Binders. In Proceedings of the Transportation and Development Institute Congress 2011, Chicago, IL, USA, 13–16 March 2011; pp. 528–537. [Google Scholar]
  10. Rubio, M.C.; Martínez, G.; Baena, L.; Moreno, F. Warm mix asphalt: An overview. J. Clean. Prod. 2012, 24, 76–84. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhang, J.; Yang, F.; Pei, J.; Xu, S.; An, F. Viscosity-temperature characteristics of warm mix asphalt binder with Sasobit®. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 78, 34–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Hurley, G. Evaluation of New Technologies for Use in Warm Mix Asphalt. Doctoral Dissertation, Auburn University, Auburn, AL, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hurley, G.C.; Prowell, B.D. Evaluation of Sasobit for use in warm mix asphalt. NCAT Rep. 2005, 5, 1–27. [Google Scholar]
  14. Zhao, G.-J.; Guo, P. Workability of Sasobit Warm Mixture Asphalt. Energy Procedia 2012, 16, 1230–1236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  15. Liu, J.; Li, P. Low Temperature Performance of Sasobit-Modified Warm-Mix Asphalt. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2012, 24, 57–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Liu, J.; Saboundjian, S.; Li, P.; Connor, B.; Brunette, B. Laboratory Evaluation of Sasobit-Modified Warm-Mix Asphalt for Alaskan Conditions. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2011, 23, 1498–1505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Raveesh, J.; Dhumagond, R.; Bijjur, S. Experimental Study of WMA by Using Sasobit Additive. Int. J. Appl. Eng. Res. 2018, 13, 163–165. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sobhi, S.; Yousefi, A.; Behnood, A. The effects of Gilsonite and Sasobit on the mechanical properties and durability of asphalt mixtures. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 238, 117676. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Main Roads Western Australia. Sampling procedures for Aggregates. Test Method WA 732. Document No. 71/04/733. 2012. Available online: http://www.mainroads.wa.gov.au (accessed on 24 March 2022).
  20. Jones, D. Warm-Mix Asphalt Study: Field Test Performance Evaluation. 2013. Available online: https://escholarship.org/uc/item/4bp7602f (accessed on 24 March 2022).
  21. Shell, B. The Shell Bitumen Handbook; Thomas Telford Publishing: London, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  22. Austroads. Guide to Pavement Technology: Part 4F: Bituminous Binders. Publication No AGPT04F/08. 2008. Available online: https://austroads.com.au/publications/pavement/agpt04f-08 (accessed on 24 March 2022).
  23. Australian Standards. Methods of Sampling and Testing Asphalt—Determination of the Resilient Modulus of Asphalt—Indirect Tensile Method. 1995. Available online: https://www.saiglobal.com/PDFTemp/Previews/OSH/As/as2000/2800/2891131.PDF (accessed on 24 March 2022).
  24. Australian Standard 2891: Methods of Sampling and Testing Asphalt: AS 2891.9 Determination of Bulk Density of Compacted Asphalt: AS 2891.9.2-1993 Presaturation Method. Available online: https://infostore.saiglobal.com/en-au/standards/as-2891-9-2-1993-123539_saig_as_as_259566/ (accessed on 1 March 2022).
  25. Amini, A.; Goli, A.; Ziari, H. The influence of nanoclay on the performance properties and moisture susceptibility of rubberized asphalt mixture. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2017, 35, 175–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. “Determining Dynamic Modulus of Hot Mix Asphalt” (HMA) TP 62-AASHTO Provisional Standards. 2003. Available online: https://downloads.transportation.org/hm-33tableofcontents.pdf (accessed on 20 March 2022).
  27. Mohajerani, A.; Tanriverdi, Y.; Nguyen, B.T.; Wong, K.K.; Dissanayake, H.N.; Johnson, L.; Whitfield, D.; Thomson, G.; Alqattan, E.; Rezaei, A. Physico-mechanical properties of asphalt concrete incorporated with encapsulated cigarette butts. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 153, 69–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. R. Group. Commentary to Ag: Pt/T233—Fatigue Life of Compacted Bituminous Mixes Subject to Repeated Flexural Bending Sample Preparation—Fatigue Life of Compacted Bituminous Mixes Subject to Repeated Flexural Bending. 2006, pp. 1–17. Available online: https://www.yumpu.com/en/document/read/34206978/commentary-to-agpt-t233-fatigue-life-of-compacted-austroads (accessed on 24 March 2022).
  29. Asphalt, A.; Asphalt, N.; Pavement, A.; R. Group. Commentary to Ag: Pt/T231—Deformation Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures by the Wheel Tracking Test Deformation Resistance of Asphalt Mixtures by the Weel Tracking Test. 2006, pp. 1–11. Available online: https://docplayer.net/43395669-Commentary-to-ag-pt-t231-deformation-resistance-of-asphalt-mixtures-by-the-wheel-tracking-test.html (accessed on 15 February 2022).
  30. Austroads. Guide to Pavement Technology Part 2: Pavement Structural Design. Austroads Technical Report No. AGPT02—Sydney, NSW, Australia. 2012. Available online: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Atousa-Khazaie-2/post/How_to_use_of_empirical_design_charts_for_granular_pavement_design/attachment/616d8de6f5675b211b09ce60/AS%3A1080277778595924%401634569701564/download/AGPT02-17_Guide_to_Pavement_Technology_Part_2_Pavement_Structural_Design.pdf (accessed on 24 March 2022).
  31. Gong, J.; Liu, Y.; Wang, Q.; Xi, Z.; Cai, J.; Ding, G.; Xie, H. Performance evaluation of warm mix asphalt additive modified epoxy asphalt rubbers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 204, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Behroozikhah, A.; Morafa, S.H.; Aflaki, S. Investigation of fatigue cracks on RAP mixtures containing Sasobit and crumb rubber based on fracture energy. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 141, 526–532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Ghuzlan, K.A.; Ar’Ar, O.S. Performance of warm asphalt mixtures using Sasobit. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2016, 34, 1263–1271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Behbahani, H.; Ayazi, M.J.; Moniri, A. Laboratory investigation of rutting performance of warm mix asphalt containing high content of reclaimed asphalt pavement. Pet. Sci. Technol. 2017, 35, 1556–1561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Amelian, S.; Manian, M.; Abtahi, S.M.; Goli, A. Moisture sensitivity and mechanical performance assessment of warm mix asphalt containing by-product steel slag. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 176, 329–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fakhri, M.; Ghanizadeh, A.R.; Omrani, H. Comparison of Fatigue Resistance of HMA and WMA Mixtures Modified by SBS. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2013, 104, 168–177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Goh, S.W.; You, Z. Warm Mix Asphalt Using Sasobit in Cold Region. In Cold Regions Engineering 2009; American Society of Civil Engineers: Reston, VA, USA, 2009; pp. 288–298. [Google Scholar]
  38. Zelelew, H.; Paugh, C.; Corrigan, M.; Belagutti, S.; Ramakrishnareddy, J. Laboratory evaluation of the mechanical properties of plant-produced warm-mix asphalt mixtures. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 2012, 14, 49–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Alinezhad, M.; Sahaf, A. Investigation of the fatigue characteristics of warm stone matrix asphalt (WSMA) containing electric arc furnace (EAF) steel slag as coarse aggregate and Sasobit as warm mix additive. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2019, 11, e00265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Mashaan, N.S.; Chegenizadeh, A.; Nikraz, H.; Rezagholilou, A. Investigating the engineering properties of asphalt binder modified with waste plastic polymer. Ain Shams Eng. J. 2021, 12, 1569–1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Mashaan, N.S.; Rezagholilou, A.; Nikraz, H. Waste Plastic as Additive in Asphalt Pavement Reinforcement: A review. In Proceedings of the 18th AAPA International Flexible Pavements Conference & Exhibition, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 18–21 August 2019. [Google Scholar]
  42. Rigabadi, A.; Herozi, M.R.Z.; Rezagholilou, A. An attempt for development of pavements temperature prediction models based on remote sensing data and artificial neural network. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mabrouk, G.M.; Elbagalati, O.S.; Dessouky, S.; Fuentes, L.; Walubita, L.F. 3D-finite element pavement structural model for using with traffic speed deflectometers. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rezagholilou, A.; Nikraz, H. Main Cause of Deterioration in Wet–Dry Test Method on Base Course Material. J. Mater. Civ. Eng. 2020, 32, 06020001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rezagholilou, A.; Papadakis, V.G.; Nikraz, H. Rate of carbonation in cement modified base course material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 150, 646–652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The particle-size distribution.
Figure 1. The particle-size distribution.
Civileng 03 00021 g001
Figure 2. Sasobit.
Figure 2. Sasobit.
Civileng 03 00021 g002
Figure 3. Viscosity results at different temperatures for C320 bitumen mixed with Sasobit: (a) viscosity at 60 °C to 110 °C; (b) viscosity at 120 °C to 165 °C.
Figure 3. Viscosity results at different temperatures for C320 bitumen mixed with Sasobit: (a) viscosity at 60 °C to 110 °C; (b) viscosity at 120 °C to 165 °C.
Civileng 03 00021 g003
Figure 4. Resilient modulus test results of different asphalt mixtures.
Figure 4. Resilient modulus test results of different asphalt mixtures.
Civileng 03 00021 g004
Figure 5. Comparison of the resilient modulus between the proposed model and the laboratory results of other researchers.
Figure 5. Comparison of the resilient modulus between the proposed model and the laboratory results of other researchers.
Civileng 03 00021 g005
Figure 6. The results of indirect tensile strength of different asphalt mixtures.
Figure 6. The results of indirect tensile strength of different asphalt mixtures.
Civileng 03 00021 g006
Figure 7. TSR values of different asphalt mixtures.
Figure 7. TSR values of different asphalt mixtures.
Civileng 03 00021 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of the tensile strength results between the proposed model and the laboratory results of other researchers: (a) conditioned samples; (b) unconditioned samples.
Figure 8. Comparison of the tensile strength results between the proposed model and the laboratory results of other researchers: (a) conditioned samples; (b) unconditioned samples.
Civileng 03 00021 g008
Figure 9. Master curves results: (a) HMA samples; (b) WMA with 1.5% Sasobit; (c) WMA with 3% Sasobit; (d) WMA with 6% Sasobit.
Figure 9. Master curves results: (a) HMA samples; (b) WMA with 1.5% Sasobit; (c) WMA with 3% Sasobit; (d) WMA with 6% Sasobit.
Civileng 03 00021 g009aCivileng 03 00021 g009b
Figure 10. Dynamic modulus results: (a) HMA samples; (b) WMA with 1.5% Sasobit; (c) WMA with 3% Sasobit; (d) WMA with 6% Sasobit.
Figure 10. Dynamic modulus results: (a) HMA samples; (b) WMA with 1.5% Sasobit; (c) WMA with 3% Sasobit; (d) WMA with 6% Sasobit.
Civileng 03 00021 g010aCivileng 03 00021 g010b
Figure 11. Comparison of the dynamic module results between the proposed model and the laboratory results of other researchers.
Figure 11. Comparison of the dynamic module results between the proposed model and the laboratory results of other researchers.
Civileng 03 00021 g011
Figure 12. Comparison of average fatigue resistance for HMA and WMA.
Figure 12. Comparison of average fatigue resistance for HMA and WMA.
Civileng 03 00021 g012
Figure 13. Comparison moduli at 20 °C and 10 Hz loading rate.
Figure 13. Comparison moduli at 20 °C and 10 Hz loading rate.
Civileng 03 00021 g013
Figure 14. Comparison of the r flexural stiffness results between the proposed model and the laboratory results of other researchers.
Figure 14. Comparison of the r flexural stiffness results between the proposed model and the laboratory results of other researchers.
Civileng 03 00021 g014
Figure 15. Comparison of wheel tracking results for HMA and WMA.
Figure 15. Comparison of wheel tracking results for HMA and WMA.
Civileng 03 00021 g015
Table 1. Aggregate properties.
Table 1. Aggregate properties.
Test DescriptionValueTest Standard
Los Angeles abrasion:
granite and other rock types
Basalt
35% Maximum
25% Maximum
WA 220.1-2012
Flakiness index35% MaximumWA 216.1-2016
Water absorption2% MaximumAS 1141.6.1
Wet strength100 kN minimumAS 1141.22
Wet/Dry strength variation35% MaximumAS 1141.22
Stripping test value10% MaximumAS 1141.50
Degradation factor50 minimumAS1141.25.2
Secondary mineral content25% maximumAS 1141.26
Petrographic examinationStatement of suitability for use as an asphalt aggregate-
Table 2. Bitumen C320 properties (AS 2008–2013).
Table 2. Bitumen C320 properties (AS 2008–2013).
Test DescriptionMinMaxTest Standard
Viscosity at 60 °C, Pa.s260380AS 2341.2
AS 2341.3
Viscosity at 135 °C, Pa.s0.40.65AS 2341.2
AS 2341.3
AS 2341.4
Penetration at 25 °C, (100 g, 5 s),
pu (1 pu = 0.1 mm)
40-AS 2341.12
Density at 15 °C, kg/m31000-AS 2341.7
Flash Point, °C250-AS 2341.14
Matter insoluble in toluene, percent-1AS 2341.8
Table 3. Asphalt binder properties.
Table 3. Asphalt binder properties.
Bitumen Type C320C320 Modified
1.5% Sasobit
C320 Modified
3% Sasobit
C320 Modified
6% Sasobit
Test DiscerptionTest StandardValues
Dynamic viscosity at 60 °C ( Pa . s )AS 2341.22891510--
Kinematic viscosity at 135 °C ( mm 2 /s)AS2341.2
AS 2341.4
0.5530.5160.44830.575
Softening point (°C)AS 2341.18–199256.165.782.1592.75
Table 4. Rolling thin film oven test: C320 AS 2341.10.
Table 4. Rolling thin film oven test: C320 AS 2341.10.
Test DescriptionMinMaxTest Standard
Viscosity of residue at 60 °C
as percentage of original
-300AS 2341.2
AS 2341.3
Ductility at 15 °C, mmN/A AS 2341.11
Durability valueN/A AS/NZS 2341.13
WA 716.1
Table 5. Average resilient modulus results.
Table 5. Average resilient modulus results.
Mixes TypeSpecimen NAverage Rise Time (ms)Average Force (N)Average of Five Pulses (MPa)Standard Deviation
(MPa)
Average
Resilient Modulus (MPa)
Sasobit Effects Compared to HMA Mix
HMA Control12418224397310.94472-
23720684814
33917844206
WMA 1.5% Sasobit11819844061606.744900.4%
23121024919
WMA 3% Sasobit1372436537084.5528618.2%
24324675286
34224255201
WMA 6% Sasobit13733646611235.8683552.8%
24132316812
3363487081
Table 6. Typical resilient modulus values for various mixes in Australia [30].
Table 6. Typical resilient modulus values for various mixes in Australia [30].
Binder Type10 mm14 mm20 mm
RangeTypicalRangeTypicalRangeTypical
Class 1702000–600035002500–400037002000–45003300
Class 320300–600045002000–700050003000–75005200
Class 6003300–500060004000–900065004000–95007000
Multigrade1500–500045003000–700050004000–70005500
SBS1500–400022002000–450025003000–70003000
EVA3000–60005600
Table 7. TSR average results for HMA and WMA.
Table 7. TSR average results for HMA and WMA.
Test Method UsedHMA ControlWMA
1.5% Sasobit
WMA
3.0% Sasobit
WMA
6.0% Sasobit
Specification
Dry set air voids (%)
(Average of 3 tests)
8.187.98.1 -
Dry tensile strength at 25 °C (kPa) (Average of 3 tests)1058.31018.21029.31036.5850
Standard deviation (kPa)50234534
Wet set air voids (%)
(Average of 3 tests)
7.98.288.1-
Wet tensile strength at 25 °C (kPa) (Average of 3 tests)956.8886.2917.6932.4750
Standard deviation (kPa)32433759
Tensile Strength ratio (%)90.487.089.19080.0
Table 8. Master curve parameters.
Table 8. Master curve parameters.
Mixes Typeδ α β γ a 1 a 2 T R T f f r a T
HMA Control2.711.66−2.68−0.030.120.007320410−0.50432−0.05
WMA 1.5% Sasobit2.711.66−2.68−0.030.120.007320410−0.50432−0.05
WMA 3.0% Sasobit3.081.46−1.58−0.00510.120.007320410−0.50432−0.05
WMA 6.0% Sasobit3.081.46−1.58−0.00510.120.007320410−0.50432−0.05
Table 9. Laboratory results of WMA and HMA for dynamic modules.
Table 9. Laboratory results of WMA and HMA for dynamic modules.
Mixes TypeTemperature (˚C)Dynamic Modulus (MPa)
0.1 (Hz)1 (Hz)10 (Hz)
HMA Control48732.713,208.617,621.9
201572.93829.47464.2
40125.6399.91356.1
WMA 1.5% Sasobit48478.812,346.216,191.5
2017013866.36898.9
40144.8447.91347.7
WMA 3.0% Sasobit410,375.814,687.519,214.1
202646.55138.88687
40312.7803.71990.6
WMA 6.0% Sasobit411,495.415,499.719,611.2
203311.75923.29451.2
40474.71119.22516.9
Table 10. Fatigue beam results.
Table 10. Fatigue beam results.
MixesBeam NAir Voids (%)Initial Flexural Stiffness (MPa)Termination Stiffness
(50% of the Initial Stiffness (MPa))
Cycle Count
of 1,000,000
HMA Control15.252962648220,990
HMA Control25.351152557473,310
HMA Control34.956172809457,630
Average553432671383,977
Standard deviation0.2254.2127.6141,368.2
WMA Sasobit (1.5%)1564743237192,270
WMA Sasobit (1.5%)24.862203110151,940
WMA Sasobit (1.5%)34.961383069196,700
Average562773139180,303
Standard deviation0.1175.287.624,663
WMA Sasobit (3.0%)15.162283114182,210
WMA Sasobit (3.0%)25.263693185130,870
WMA Sasobit (3.0%)35.164113205180,400
Average563363168164,493
Standard deviation0.195.947.829,132.7
WMA Sasobit (6.0%)1578253913145,340
WMA Sasobit (6.0%)24.975653783106,080
WMA Sasobit (6.0%)34.96834381377,000
Average574083836109,473
Standard deviation0.1513.868.134,296.1
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Rezaeizadeh Herozi, M.; Valenzuela, W.; Rezagholilou, A.; Rigabadi, A.; Nikraz, H. New Models for the Properties of Warm Mix Asphalt with Sasobit. CivilEng 2022, 3, 347-364. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/civileng3020021

AMA Style

Rezaeizadeh Herozi M, Valenzuela W, Rezagholilou A, Rigabadi A, Nikraz H. New Models for the Properties of Warm Mix Asphalt with Sasobit. CivilEng. 2022; 3(2):347-364. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/civileng3020021

Chicago/Turabian Style

Rezaeizadeh Herozi, Morteza, Wilfredo Valenzuela, Alireza Rezagholilou, Ali Rigabadi, and Hamid Nikraz. 2022. "New Models for the Properties of Warm Mix Asphalt with Sasobit" CivilEng 3, no. 2: 347-364. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/civileng3020021

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop