Next Article in Journal
Synthesis of Novel Acylhydrazone-Oxazole Hybrids and Docking Studies of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease
Previous Article in Journal
Production of Biofuels by 5-Hydroxymethylfurfural Etherification Using Ion-Exchange Resins as Solid Acid Catalysts
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Proceeding Paper

Capture and Methanation of CO2 Using Dual-Function Materials (DFMs) †

by
Anastasios I. Tsiotsias
1,
Nikolaos D. Charisiou
1,
Ioannis V. Yentekakis
2 and
Maria A. Goula
1,*
1
Laboratory of Alternative Fuels and Environmental Catalysis (LAFEC), Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Western Macedonia, GR-50100 Koila, Greece
2
Laboratory of Physical Chemistry & Chemical Processes, School of Environmental Engineering, Technical University of Crete, GR-73100 Chania, Greece
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Presented at the 1st International Electronic Conference on Catalysis Sciences, 10–30 November 2020; Available online: https://sciforum.net/conference/ECCS2020.
Published: 9 November 2020
(This article belongs to the Proceedings of The 1st International Electronic Conference on Catalysis Sciences)

Abstract

:
The conversion of CO2, captured from flue gases, into synthetic natural gas (SNG) aims to create a closed carbon cycle, where excess H2 produced from renewables is utilized to transform CO2 released from existing conventional power plants into a reliable and high energy density carrier, that is CH4. In the last five years, extensive research effort has been dedicated to the synthesis and optimization of composite materials for the realization of this process. These materials, also known as dual-function materials or DFMs, typically consist of an alkaline metal oxide or carbonate phase, along with a Ru or Ni metallic phase supported on a high surface area carrier. The DFMs incorporate both sorptive and catalytic capabilities, capturing the CO2 in the initial sorption step and then converting it into CH4 upon H2 inflow. The dispersion of the sorptive and catalytically active phases, the CO2 affinity of the alkaline phase, the reducibility of the supported metals, and the selectivity towards CH4 production are some of the parameters influencing their performance. Hereby, we aim to present the most recent works dedicated to the development and optimization of such dual-function materials to be used in the combined capture and methanation of CO2.

1. Introduction

The expanding global economy requires the utilization of readily available energy sources, such as fossil fuels, to keep up with the always increasing energy demands of our society. The use of fossil fuels as an energy source inevitably results to greenhouse gas emissions, such as CO2, into our atmosphere [1]. The problem of increasing anthropogenic CO2 emissions can be partly countered by the storage of captured CO2 into underground geological formations (carbon capture and storage, CCS) [2] or by the utilization of captured CO2 for the production of useful chemicals, such as syngas, methanol, and methane (carbon capture and utilization, CCU) [3]. The conversion of CO2 into chemicals often requires the use of hydrogen as a reducing agent. The full hydrogenation of CO2 into CH4 or CO2 methanation aims to convert captured CO2 and produced H2 into a molecule with a higher energy density (CH4) and allow for the utilization of the extensive natural gas grid for its transportation [4]. The CO2 methanation reaction is also called the Sabatier reaction and is exothermic:
CO2 + 4H2 ⇌ CH4 + 2H2O, ΔH298Κ = −164 kJ/mol
CO2 needs to be initially captured from industrial flue gases, either via absorption using liquids or adsorption using solids. Amongst the solid CO2 adsorbents, CaO and CaO doped with various promoters are the most studied. Modified or unmodified CaO captures and releases CO2 via a reversible carbonization/ decarbonization process [5]. The CO2 can then be either stored or further processed to produce valuable chemicals.
The combination of the aforementioned processes, namely CO2 capture and CO2 methanation, can be realized via the utilization of composite materials that can perform both functions. These materials are known as dual-function materials (DFMs) and typically consist of a CO2 sorption phase (such as CaO, MgO or Na2CO3) and a catalytically active methanation phase (metallic Ni or Ru nanoparticles) supported on a high surface area carrier (such as Al2O3 or ZrO2) [6,7]. The Farrauto group have been the first to prepare a DFM that consisted of CaO and Ru phases supported on mesoporous Al2O3. CO2 could be initially captured by the CaO sites and then spillover to adjacent Ru sites upon its hydrogenation during H2 inflow [8]. Ru was chosen as the active metal due to its superior methanation activity and high reducibility, being able to be reduced back to its metallic state at just 320 ℃ [9]. Further works have shown that there are many possibilities to perform the combined capture and methanation of CO2 by using different material formulations [10,11].
The increasing interest of the research community in the fields of CO2 capture and CO2 methanation has boosted the number of publications regarding DFMs during the last five years. Thus, the recent progress made in the development of such novel materials will be summarized.

2. Capture and Methanation of CO2 Using Dual-Function Materials

The concept of dual-function materials (DFMs) for the the CO2 capture and conversion to CH4 was first introduced by Farrauto and co-workers [8] (Figure 1). The materials were prepared via the subsequent impregnation of Ca and Ru precursor salts on high surface area Al2O3. In a first step, a simulated flue-gas stream containing CO2, O2, N2, and H2O was introduced into the reactor containing the DFMs. CO2 was retained by the CaO adsorbent phase and the high dispersion of CaO over the mesoporous Al2O3 support allowed for the reversible chemisorption and release of CO2 at temperatures lower compared to those for bulk CaO. Later, H2 was flown into the reactor and captured CO2 was hydrogenated after its spillover towards Ru metal sites to eventually form CH4. The optimized 5wt% Ru-10wt% CaO/Al2O3 composition produced around 0.5 mol CH4 per kg DFM. The reversible CO2 chemisorption and release over highly dispersed CaO, along with methanation over highly active and reducible Ru sites allowed for the process to proceed isothermally at 320 ℃.
Besides Ru, Rh could be also used as an active metal in DFMs [12]. The use of just 0.1 wt% Rh loading in a Rh-CaO/Al2O3 DFM was shown to produce similar amounts of CH4 to the DFM with 5 wt% Ru. However, the very high price of Rh (being about 10 times more expensive than Ru) discourages its further implementation. Also, the use of other adsorbent phases such as Na2CO3 and K2CO3 supported on Al2O3 was shown to be a more reliable approach to improve the performance of DFMs. The DFM with composition 5wt% Ru-10wt% Na2CO3/Al2O3 yielded 1.05 mol CH4 per kg DFM, roughly twice the amount of similar DFM compositions that use CaO as the adsorbent phase.
The role of Ru in DFM applications has been further studied by Wang et al. [13] and Duyar et al. [9]. Ru, when combined with a Na2CO3 or “Na2O”-type sorbent could achieve superior methanation kinetics by exhibiting faster hydrogenation rates. Furthermore, the RuOx oxides could rapidly reduce to metallic Ru at just 320 ℃ upon H2 inflow, after being previously oxidized during the CO2 capture step from the simulated flue-gas stream. In contrast, oxidized Ni required a much larger hydrogenation temperature to revert to its metallic state and thus, no CH4 could be produced upon hydrogenation at 320 ℃, when CO2 capture was performed in the presence of O2.
The reaction mechanism for the combined CO2 capture and methanation over the 5% Ru, 10% Na2CO3 (or 6.1% “Na2O)/Al2O3 DFM was studied by Proaño et al. [14] employing in-situ DRIFTS. Al-O-Na+ sites initially originated after the decomposition of Na2CO3 under a reducing atmosphere. CO2 from the gas stream was then largely adsorbed and retained by these sites as chelated carbonato complexes. The adsorbed carbonates were subsequently spilled over to nearby Ru-sites via and were hydrogenated into CH4 via formate-type intermediates. Furthermore, the use of such DFMs, but with an even lower amount of Ru (0.5%) was shown to be viable for the combined direct air capture and methanation of CO2 process [15]. Through this process, CO2 captured from ambient air, where its concentration is as low as 400 ppm, can be successfully transformed into CH4 upon H2 inflow.
As mentioned before, Ni, although being much cheaper than Ru or Rh, is not considered viable for use in DFMs under flue-gas applications due to its lower reducibility [9]. However, Arellano-Treviño et al. [16] showed that the addition of small amounts of noble metals, namely 1wt% Pt and 1wt% Ru on a 10wt% Ni-6.1wt % Na2O/Al2O3 DFM could improve the reducibility of Ni at 320 ℃ by 50% and 70%, respectively. An assumption was made that PtOx and RuOx phases were initially rapidly reduced and they in turn worked to split and spillover atomic hydrogen into nearby NiO sites. The bimetallic 1wt% Ru-10wt% Ni-6.1wt% Na2O/Al2O3 DFM exhibited the highest CO2 adsorption capacity and CH4 yield among the studied materials, due to the synergy between the Ni and Ru active metals. Proaño et al. [17] also revealed that Pt atoms served as additional CO2 capture sites in the form of Pt-CO species, but that they were inactive for methanation. In contrast, Ru sites in RuNi-based DFM aided the methanation process and provided superior reducibility and catalytic activity (Figure 2).
Other research groups have also made meaningful contributions in the field of dual-function materials. Bermejo-Lόpez et al. [18] studied the reaction mechanism and the effect of adsorbent loading over Ru-based DFMs. They found that higher adsorbent loading increased the material’s basicity and CH4 yield. Furthermore, the type of sorbent also exerted a great influence, since strong basic sites over CaO (Ru10CaO) favoured methanation at higher temperatures, while weaker adsorption of CO2 over Na2CO3 sites (Ru10Na2CO3) allowed for the methanation to proceed at lower temperatures. Regarding the reaction mechanism, adsorbed CO2 from the capture step was assumed to spillover to nearby Ru sites and then be hydrogenated into CH4 upon H2 inflow (Figure 3).
Bermejo-Lόpez et al. [19] also studied Ni-based DFMs with CaO and Na2CO3 as adsorbent phases. The presence of the adjacent CO2 adsorbent phase appeared to favour Ni reducibility, while the use of high Ni loadings was beneficial to increase the yield for CH4. Furthermore, the CO2 capture was performed under an O2-free atmosphere in this case and the temperature required for the hydrogenation of adsorbed carbonates was quite higher compared to DFMs with Ru as the active metal.
Other material formulations have been also developed for DFM applications. Cimino et al. [20] impregnated γ-Al2O3 spheres with various alkalimetals (Li, Na, K and Cs) and used Ru as an active metal. Li was the only alkalimetal that could result in increased methanation activity compared to benchmark Ru/Al2O3, as well as facilitate faster methanation kinetics upon cyclic capture and methanation of CO2 at a temperature as low as 230 ℃. Also, Sun et al. [10] prepared a DFM via mechanical mixing of an alkali nitrate promoted MgO sorbent and a Ru supported on CeO2 nanorods methanation catalyst. The increased population of sorption active sites led to the capture of a quite high amount of CO2, whereas high methanation activity was ensured by the highly active Ru/CeO2 catalyst, that could activate CO2 via oxygen vacancies in the CeO2 support, forming formate-type intermediates.
Regarding Ni-based DFMs, Hu et al. [21] used a ZrO2 support doped with K and La, and Ni as the active metal. K-addition in the support managed to greatly increase the CO2 adsorption capacity, with CO2 being bonded as bidentate carbonates, whereas La-addition favoured the methanation kinetics due to the formation of easily reducible formate intermediates. Furthermore, Zhou et al. [11] employed a different material type, namely a 2D-layered Ni/MgO-Al2O3 composite derived from an initial hydrotalcite precursor as a DFM. Co-precipitation synthesis of the initial Ni- and Mg-containing hydrotalcites was followed by high temperature calcination and reduction to obtain the final 2D-layered composites, that contain a plethora of MgO basic sites. The authors showed that increased Ni contents could weaken the metal-support interaction, whereas the durations of the individual CO2 capture and methanation steps could be tuned so as to achieve an optimal utilization of reactant H2 gas (35 s for CO2 capture and 25s for CO2 methanation).
Finally, Jo et al. [22] used a simple Ni/CaO catalyst-sorbent, prepared by the citrate sol-gel method. The addition of the Ni phase over the CaO sorbent facilitated its regeneration and CH4 production under H2 flow at temperatures lower than the ones needed for the decarbonization of CaCO3. Further, 500 ℃ was chosen as the optimum temperature for the CO2 capture and methanation process due to the high CO2 capture capacity, CH4 selectivity, and cyclic stability. Compared to the 5wt% Ru-10wt% CaO/Al2O3 DFM, operated at 320 ℃ [9], the prepared Ni/CaO material could capture at 500 oC around 13 times more CO2 and convert it into CH4 with a similar efficiency.

3. Conclusions

The emergence of novel dual-function materials that can perform the functions of capturing CO2 from industrial flue-gases and converting it to CH4 using renewable hydrogen has opened a new pathway to recycle our emitted carbon resources. This new field has attracted numerous research efforts during the last five years and great progress has been made towards enhancing the materials performance (as usually expressed in mol of produced CH4 per kg of DFM). However, further efforts need to be undertaken in order to increase the CO2 sorption capacity and CH4 yield of these materials, as well as to explore the possibility of performing the CO2 capture step from ambient air.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.I.T.; data curation, A.I.T.; formal analysis, A.I.T.; funding acquisition, I.V.Y. and M.A.G.; investigation, methodology, M.A.G.; project administration, M.A.G. and I.V.Y.; project coordination, I.V.Y.; resources, M.A.G.; supervision, N.D.C.; writing—original draft, A.I.T. and N.D.C.; writing—review & editing, N.D.C., I.V.Y., and M.A.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research has been co-financed by the European Union and Greek national funds through the operational program ‘Regional Excellence’ and the operational program Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation, under the call Research - Create - Innovate (Project code: T1EDK-00782). NDC is also grateful to the Research Committee of UOWM for financial support through grant No. 70304.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yentekakis, I.V.; Dong, F. Grand Challenges for Catalytic Remediation in Environmental and Energy Applications Toward a Cleaner and Sustainable Future. Front. Environ. Chem. 2020, 1, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Raza, A.; Gholami, R.; Rezaee, R.; Rasouli, V.; Rabiei, M. Significant aspects of carbon capture and storage—A review. Petroleum 2019, 5, 335–340. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Baena-Moreno, F.M.; Rodríguez-Galán, M.; Vega, F.; Alonso-Fariñas, B.; Vilches Arenas, L.F.; Navarrete, B. Carbon capture and utilization technologies: A literature review and recent advances. Energy Sources Part A Recover. Util. Environ. Eff. 2019, 41, 1403–1433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ashok, J.; Pati, S.; Hongmanorom, P.; Tianxi, Z.; Junmei, C.; Kawi, S. A review of recent catalyst advances in CO2 methanation processes. Catal. Today 2020, 356, 471–489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sun, H.; Wu, C.; Shen, B.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Huang, J. Progress in the development and application of CaO-based adsorbents for CO2 capture—A review. Mater. Today Sustain. 2018, 1–2, 1–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Melo Bravo, P.; Debecker, D.P. Combining CO2 capture and catalytic conversion to methane. Waste Dispos. Sustain. Energy 2019, 1, 53–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Tsiotsias, A.I.; Charisiou, N.D.; Yentekakis, I.V.; Goula, M.A. The Role of Alkali and Alkaline Earth Metals in the CO2 Methanation Reaction and the Combined Capture and Methanation of CO2. Catalysts 2020, 10, 812. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Duyar, M.S.; Arellano-Treviño, M.A.; Farrauto, R.J. Dual function materials for CO2 capture and conversion using renewable H2. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2015, 168–169, 370–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Arellano-Treviño, M.A.; He, Z.; Libby, M.C.; Farrauto, R.J. Catalysts and adsorbents for CO2 capture and conversion with dual function materials: Limitations of Ni-containing DFMs for flue gas applications. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 31, 143–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sun, H.; Zhang, Y.; Guan, S.; Huang, J.; Wu, C. Direct and highly selective conversion of captured CO2 into methane through integrated carbon capture and utilization over dual functional materials. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 38, 262–272. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zhou, Z.; Sun, N.; Wang, B.; Han, Z.; Cao, S.; Hu, D.; Zhu, T.; Shen, Q.; Wei, W. 2D-Layered Ni–MgO–Al2O3 Nanosheets for Integrated Capture and Methanation of CO2. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 360–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Duyar, M.S.; Wang, S.; Arellano-Treviño, M.A.; Farrauto, R.J. CO2 utilization with a novel dual function material (DFM) for capture and catalytic conversion to synthetic natural gas: An update. J. CO2 Util. 2016, 15, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, S.; Schrunk, E.T.; Mahajan, H.; Farrauto, R.J. The role of ruthenium in CO2 capture and catalytic conversion to fuel by dual function materials (DFM). Catalysts 2017, 7, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Proaño, L.; Tello, E.; Arellano-Treviño, M.A.; Wang, S.; Farrauto, R.J.; Cobo, M. In-situ DRIFTS study of two-step CO2 capture and catalytic methanation over Ru,“Na2O”/Al2O3 Dual Functional Material. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 479, 25–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Jeong-Potter, C.W.; Farrauto, R.J. Feasibility Study of Combining Direct Air Capture of CO2 and Methanation at Isothermal Conditions with Dual Function Materials. Appl. Catal. B Environ. in press. [CrossRef]
  16. Arellano-Treviño, M.A.; Kanani, N.; Jeong-Potter, C.W.; Farrauto, R.J. Bimetallic catalysts for CO2 capture and hydrogenation at simulated flue gas conditions. Chem. Eng. J. 2019, 375, 121953. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Proaño, L.; Arellano-Treviño, M.A.; Farrauto, R.J.; Figueredo, M.; Jeong Potter, C.; Cobo, M. Mechanistic assessment of dual function materials, composed of Ru-Ni, Na2O/Al2O3 and Pt-Ni, Na2O/Al2O3, for CO2 capture and methanation by in-situ DRIFTS. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 533, 147469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Bermejo-López, A.; Pereda-Ayo, B.; González-Marcos, J.A.; González-Velasco, J.R. Mechanism of the CO2 storage and in situ hydrogenation to CH4. Temperature and adsorbent loading effects over Ru-CaO/Al2O3 and Ru-Na2CO3/Al2O3 catalysts. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2019, 256, 117845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bermejo-López, A.; Pereda-Ayo, B.; González-Marcos, J.A.; González-Velasco, J.R. Ni loading effects on dual function materials for capture and in-situ conversion of CO2 to CH4 using CaO or Na2CO3. J. CO2 Util. 2019, 34, 576–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cimino, S.; Boccia, F.; Lisi, L. Effect of alkali promoters (Li, Na, K) on the performance of Ru/Al2O3 catalysts for CO2 capture and hydrogenation to methane. J. CO2 Util. 2020, 37, 195–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, L.; Urakawa, A. Continuous CO2 capture and reduction in one process: CO2 methanation over unpromoted and promoted Ni/ZrO2. J. CO2 Util. 2018, 25, 323–329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Jo, S.B.; Woo, J.H.; Lee, J.H.; Kim, T.Y.; Kang, H.I.; Lee, S.C.; Kim, J.C. A novel integrated CO2 capture and direct methanation process using Ni/CaO catal-sorbents. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2020, 4, 4679–4687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic summarizing the dual-function materials (DFM) concept. Reproduced with permission from ref. [7]. Copyright 2020 MDPI.
Figure 1. Schematic summarizing the dual-function materials (DFM) concept. Reproduced with permission from ref. [7]. Copyright 2020 MDPI.
Chemproc 02 00035 g001
Figure 2. Mechanism of CO2 capture and methanation over Ni-based DFMs and Ni-based DFMs impregnated with small amounts of Pt and Ru noble metals. Reproduced with permission from ref [17]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Figure 2. Mechanism of CO2 capture and methanation over Ni-based DFMs and Ni-based DFMs impregnated with small amounts of Pt and Ru noble metals. Reproduced with permission from ref [17]. Copyright 2020 Elsevier.
Chemproc 02 00035 g002
Figure 3. CO2, H2O, CH4 and CO concentration profiles during one CO2 adsorption and hydrogenation cycle at 370 °C with (a) Ru10CaO and (b) Ru10Na2CO3 samples. Reproduced with permission from ref. [18]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Figure 3. CO2, H2O, CH4 and CO concentration profiles during one CO2 adsorption and hydrogenation cycle at 370 °C with (a) Ru10CaO and (b) Ru10Na2CO3 samples. Reproduced with permission from ref. [18]. Copyright 2019 Elsevier.
Chemproc 02 00035 g003
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Tsiotsias, A.I.; Charisiou, N.D.; Yentekakis, I.V.; Goula, M.A. Capture and Methanation of CO2 Using Dual-Function Materials (DFMs). Chem. Proc. 2020, 2, 35. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ECCS2020-07567

AMA Style

Tsiotsias AI, Charisiou ND, Yentekakis IV, Goula MA. Capture and Methanation of CO2 Using Dual-Function Materials (DFMs). Chemistry Proceedings. 2020; 2(1):35. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ECCS2020-07567

Chicago/Turabian Style

Tsiotsias, Anastasios I., Nikolaos D. Charisiou, Ioannis V. Yentekakis, and Maria A. Goula. 2020. "Capture and Methanation of CO2 Using Dual-Function Materials (DFMs)" Chemistry Proceedings 2, no. 1: 35. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ECCS2020-07567

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop