Next Article in Journal
LDH Isotyping for Checkpoint Inhibitor Response Prediction in Patients with Metastatic Melanoma
Next Article in Special Issue
Cannabinoid Type-2 Receptor Agonist, JWH133 May Be a Possible Candidate for Targeting Infection, Inflammation, and Immunity in COVID-19
Previous Article in Journal
Potential Beneficial Effects of Vitamin K in SARS-CoV-2 Induced Vascular Disease?
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Current Understanding of Novel Coronavirus: Molecular Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment Approaches

by Niraj Kumar Jha 1,*,†, Madhan Jeyaraman 1,2,†, Mahesh Rachamalla 3, Shreesh Ojha 4, Kamal Dua 5,6, Dinesh Kumar Chellappan 7, Sathish Muthu 1, Ankur Sharma 8, Saurabh Kumar Jha 1, Rashmi Jain 9, Naveen Jeyaraman 10, Prajwal GS 11, Rohit Satyam 12, Fahad Khan 12, Pratibha Pandey 12, Nitin Verma 13, Sandeep Kumar Singh 14, Shubhadeep Roychoudhury 15, Sunny Dholpuria 8, Janne Ruokolainen 16 and Kavindra Kumar Kesari 16,*add Show full author list remove Hide full author list
1
Department of Biotechnology, School of Engineering & Technology (SET), Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, India
2
Department of Orthopedics, School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, India
3
Department of Biology, University of Saskatchewan, 112 Science Place, Saskatoon, SK S7N 5E2, Canada
4
Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al Ain 17666, United Arab Emirates
5
Discipline of Pharmacy, Graduate School of Health, University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, NSW 2007, Australia
6
School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Shoolini University of Biotechnology and Management Sciences, Solan 173229, Himachal Pradesh, India
7
Department of Life Sciences, School of Pharmacy, International Medical University, Bukit Jalil, Kuala Lumpur 57000, Malaysia
8
Department of Life Science, School of Basic Science & Research (SBSR), Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, India
9
School of Medical Sciences and Research, Sharda University, Greater Noida 201310, India
10
Department of Orthopedics, Kasturba Medical College, Manipal 575001, Karnataka, India
11
Department of Orthopedics, JJM Medical College, Davangere 577004, Karnataka, India
12
Department of Biotechnology, Noida Institute of Engineering & Technology, 19, Knowledge Park-II, Institutional Area, Greater Noida 201306, India
13
School of Pharmacy, Chitkara University, Punjab 140401, Himachal Pradesh, India
14
Indian Scientific Education and Technology Foundation, Lucknow 226002, India
15
Department of Life Science and Bioinformatics, Assam University, Silchar 788011, India
16
Department of Applied Physics, School of Science, Aalto University, 00076 Espoo, Finland
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Submission received: 6 February 2021 / Revised: 17 March 2021 / Accepted: 23 March 2021 / Published: 26 March 2021

Abstract

:
An outbreak of “Pneumonia of Unknown Etiology” occurred in Wuhan, China, in late December 2019. Later, the agent factor was identified and coined as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the disease was named coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In a shorter period, this newly emergent infection brought the world to a standstill. On 11 March 2020, the WHO declared COVID-19 as a pandemic. Researchers across the globe have joined their hands to investigate SARS-CoV-2 in terms of pathogenicity, transmissibility, and deduce therapeutics to subjugate this infection. The researchers and scholars practicing different arts of medicine are on an extensive quest to come up with safer ways to curb the pathological implications of this viral infection. A huge number of clinical trials are underway from the branch of allopathy and naturopathy. Besides, a paradigm shift on cellular therapy and nano-medicine protocols has to be optimized for better clinical and functional outcomes of COVID-19-affected individuals. This article unveils a comprehensive review of the pathogenesis mode of spread, and various treatment modalities to combat COVID-19 disease.

1. Introduction

The city of Wuhan in China witnessed an outbreak of pneumonia caused by a novel coronavirus in the late winter of December 2019, and with a rampant spread throughout China, it periled the world to emerge as a pandemic [1]. The etiological agent of the disease was originally called as 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV), but later it was named as severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and the disease process as Coronavirus Disease–2019 (COVID-19) by the WHO [2]. Later, SARS-CoV-2 was declared an International Public Health Emergency by the WHO on 30th January 2020. As of 14th March 2021, the world has encountered 120 million confirmed cases and 2.6 million deaths reported among them (source: Worldometer, www.worldometers.info). The transmitting capacity of SARS-CoV-2 is beyond that of its ancestral SARS-CoV that caused an outbreak of SARS in 2003 [3]. The escalation in the number of confirmed COVID-19 cases forecasts the prevailing scenarios gloomily and warrants stringent preventive and control measures. The clinical spectrum and manifestations involve the respiratory system undergoing the major brunt of COVID-19 infection; however, damage to the cardiovascular system has been reported by some patients [4]. Some patients with existing cardiovascular diseases (CVDs) may have a higher risk of associated mortality. Therefore, it is equivalently important to understand the mechanisms and extent of damage to the cardiovascular system by SARS-CoV-2 infectivity and come up with an effective treatment for these patients while minimizing the associated mortality.
Currently, there is no definite antiviral therapy developed for treating SARS-CoV-2 infection. The mainstay of treatment is rendering supportive care, as per the presenting complaints of the patient. Even treating with a combination of recombinant Interferon (IFN) and Ribavirin has been reported to show limited response against SARS-CoV-2 infection [5,6]. Following the episodes of SARS and MERS epidemics, persistent efforts have been made in streamlining newer antiviral agents to target the viral proteases, polymerases, MTases, and entry proteins respectively. However, none proved to be fruitful in terms of effectivity during the clinical trials [7,8,9]. With the flattening of the COVID-19 curve of infectivity, immunotherapies involving plasma and antibodies procured from convalescent patients have been proposed to address the present circumstances [10]. Besides, various vaccine strategies involving utilization of inactivated viruses, live-attenuated viruses, viral vector-based vaccines, subunit vaccines, recombinant proteins, and DNA vaccines have been evaluated in animals and are emerging as a preventable strategy [11,12]. Due to the lack of traditional licensed treatment or vaccine, the infection mandates implementation of infection control measures with establishing an early diagnosis, reporting, isolation, and rendering supportive treatments effectively. Individualized efforts by inculcating the healthy practice of hand hygiene, respiratory hygiene and cough etiquette, wearing well-fitted face masks, and avoiding crowded places will supplement for the same.
Various therapeutic strategies have been used to treat this viral infection, but there have been unsuccessful reports recorded so far. However, natural products including plant-derived compounds and drugs can be a potential therapeutic approach to combat its growth and spreading capacity in the future. In this review, we have discussed the various pathological aspects including synthesis, maturation, infectivity, and diagnostic prospects of COVID-19. Additionally, we have also highlighted the recently used drugs and vaccines in combating SARS-CoV-2 infection.

2. Classification, Origin, Primary Reservoirs, and Hosts of Coronavirus

Adetailed outline of the source and transmission is important for developing preventive strategies for containing the spread of the infection. SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the order Nidovirales and family Cornaviridae. The family comprises two subfamilies, i.e., Torovirinae and Coronavirae. Subsequently, the members of the sub-family Coronaviridae are further divided into four genera: (i) alpha coronavirus, 229E, and NL63 are the human coronaviruses that are responsible for croup and the common cold, (ii) In comparison, SARS-CoV-2, MERS-CoV, HCoV-OC43, HCoV-HKU1, and SARS-CoV are classified as beta coronaviruses, (iii) Gamma coronavirus includes viruses of whales and birds, and (iv) Delta coronavirus comprises viruses isolated from birds and pigs [13]. These viruses infect a wide variety of host species, and diversity among these viruses leads to different pathological outcomes. The coronaviruses with pathological manifestations have been enumerated in Table 1 for a better understanding of the same.
SARS-CoV-2 belongs to the beta coronavirus family as that of extremely pathogenic viruses such as SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV. It is a positive-sense single-stranded RNA (+ssRNA) and an enveloped virus. SARS-CoV-2 is regarded as a novel beta coronavirus infecting humans [14]. Indications have been received from the phylogenetic analysis of the SARS-CoV-2 genome suggesting its close relation (with 88% identity) to two coronaviruses that were bat-derived, SARS-like, and were collected in eastern China in 2018 (bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21). However, it is genetically different from SARS-CoV (approximately 79% similarity) and MERS-CoV [14]. A further study conducted using the genome sequences of SARS-CoV, RaTG13, and SARS-CoV-2 revealed that there is a better correlation between the virus and a bat coronavirus, BatCoV RaTG13, that had been previously detected in Yunnan province in Rhinolophus affinis, which resembles 96.2% of the overall identity of the genome sequence [15]. No evidence of recombination events was found during a study in the genome of SARS-CoV-2 from other viruses that originated from bats such as SARSr-CoVs, SARS-CoVs, and BatCoV RaTG13 [15]. When put together, these findings indicate the original host of the virus could be bats [14,15]. Albeit, there is a need to undertake relevant epidemiological studies to determine whether the transmission of the virus to humans is being facilitated by an intermediate host. It is unlikely that bats are the transmitting agents of the virus to humans due to various reasons [14]. (i) There are suggestions that despite having a relatively long branch sequence identity below 90% with bat-SL-CoVZXC21 and bat-SL-CoVZC45, they are not considered as the direct ancestors of SARS-CoV-2, (ii) In the Huanan Seafood Market, no bats were found being sold or purchased, but there were several non-aquatic animals (including mammals) that were up for purchase, (iii) Other animals have acted as intermediate hosts (camels and civets) in other coronaviruses where the natural reservoir is the bat. The instances include MERS-CoV and SARS-CoV. Though, it is pertinent to mention here that bats do not always require an intermediary host for transmitting the viruses to humans. For instance, in Bangladesh, the Nipah virus was transmitted to humans through bats shedding into the sap of raw date palm [16].
Moreover, the initial focus of the researchers was on palm civets and raccoon dogs as the key reservoirs of the SARS-CoV infection. The research study reported positive results for the viral RNA detection from the samples isolated from civets only in the food market, suggesting civet palms as the secondary hosts [17]. In the year 2001, the samples isolated from healthy individuals were subjected to molecular assessment, and it showed the frequency rate of antibodies against the SARS coronavirus to be 2.5%. This suggests that the circulation of the SARScoronavirus in humans might have started before the outbreak in 2003 [18]. Later on, the suggestion that bats can be a source of viral replication was suggested when it was found that Rhinolophus bats have anti-SARS-CoV antibodies [19]. The first emergence of MERS was in Saudi Arabia in 2012 [20]. The zoonotic source for MERS coronavirus was reported to be camels, and the identified etiological agent also belonged to betacoronavirus. During a study conducted recently, MERS coronavirus was also detected in Pipistrellus and Perimyotis bats, thereby proffering the bats to be the major transmitting medium and key host for the virus [21,22,23]. It was initially suggested by a group of researchers that snakes can be the possible hosts for the virus, but when the genomic similarity between SARS-like bat viruses and novel coronavirus was established, the statement that only bats can be the key reservoirs received support [24,25]. It was revealed from a detailed analysis of the homologous recombination that the development of the receptor binding spike glycoprotein of novel coronavirus occurs from a yet unknown Beta-CoV and a SARS-CoV (CoVZC45 or CoVZXC21) [26]. Further, more work is required for the eradication of the virus regarding the intermediate zoonotic source’s identification that led to the transmission of the virus to humans. However, as predicted by Fan et al., there is also a possibility of another outbreak in a couple of years [27]. This was already expected for the current outbreak caused by SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19), and it will also be contained as soon as earlier outbreaks. However, the key challenge is to plan and prepare ourselves to combat another zoonotic COVID-19 epidemic more effectively in the future.

3. Transmission Modes of Coronavirus

Most of the initial cases of COVID-19 had been linked with the Huanan Seafood Market, thereby suggesting that the SARS-CoV-2 have been transmitted to humans from animals. The first mode of disease transmission and the plausible origination of SARS-CoV-2 are not yet wellknown [28]. Initial cluster analysis of infections states that there was a common point of exposure for infected individuals: a seafood market in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China. The restaurants associated with this market are famous for providing diverse kinds of wild animals for consumption [29]. The role played by the Huanan Seafood Wholesale Market in spreading the disease is not clear yet. However, the Huanan South China Seafood market also trades in live animals, including bats, poultry, marmots, bats, and snakes [25]. This might be a point of zoonotic transmission [29]. Albeit, SARS-CoV-2 is alleged to have zoonotic origination with further human-to-human transmission, but the likelihood of its fecal–oral transmission mandates to rule out the same with additional epidemiological investigations [30]. Though evidence has been provided through a genomic study that the introduction of the virus into the Huanan Seafood Market took place from a yet unknown location, and from there on, it started spreading extremely quickly, but the human-to-human transmission might have started earlier [31]. In addition, it might transmit through direct contact as in other respiratory viruses, such as by shaking contaminated hands or exposure to contaminated surfaces (fomite transmission). Still, other potential routes of SARS-CoV-2 transmission such as blood transfusion, organ transplantation [32], and trans-placental and perinatal transmission need to be adduced more concretely.
The clusters of infected medical personnel and family members have confirmed the occurrence of person-to-person transmission [26]. The aforementioned transmission seemingly occurs among close contacts majorly through respiratory droplets produced upon coughing or sneezing by an infected person. The findings regarding the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 on surfaces for up to 96 h and other coronaviruses for up to 9 days account for a larger aspect of fomite transmission of infection [33,34]. However, the asymptomatic transmission of the infection remains controversial. An initial study that was published on 30 January 2020 reported on asymptomatic transmission, but it has been subsequently found that the researchers failed to direct interview the patient who certainly showed symptoms before disease transmission [35,36]. Another recent study, published on 21 February, also mentioned asymptomatic transmission; however, such studies can be limited due to errors in self-reported symptoms or unknowingly coming in contact with other fomites and cases [37]. The findings regarding the characteristics of the disease have been changing rapidly, and it is important to note that all are subjected to a selection bias. The average incubation period has been pegged at 5.2 days with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI) of 4.1–7.0 days, while the other case studies have reported around 19 or 24 days respectively [38,39,40]. However, the definition of the case largely relies on a window of 14 days [41]. Estimation of the basic reproductive number (R0) has been done with varying interpretations and results. The average number of infections that can spread from a single infected individual in a fully susceptible population is measured by R0 [42]. R0 was found to be 2.7 for SARS from studies conducted on prior outbreaks and 2.4 for pandemic H1N1 influenza in 2009 [43,44]. Another study estimated the R0, was 2.2 (95% CI: 1.4–3.9) [40]. However, on further analysis of other 12 available studies, the R0 was found out to be 3.28 [45]. Though it must be taken into consideration that R0 only represents an average value, the role of super-spreaders cannot be neglected, as they can be significantly responsible for an outbreak within large clusters, and they would otherwise not affect the value of R0 significantly [46]. Moreover, R0 might be unstable during the acute phase of the pandemic [42]. Notably, the comparison between epidemiological profiles of viral infections is enumerated in Figure 1. A study conducted on nine pregnant women who had developed COVID-19 during the later stages of their pregnancy suggested that the development of symptoms in pregnant persons is not any worse than that in non-pregnant persons, and there is no corroborating evidence for vertical transmission causing intrauterine infection [47]. A hospital-based study comprising 138 COVID-19 patients suggested that 41% of patients had a hospital-associated transmission of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Another study suggested a gradual increase in the percentage of cases among health care workers with due course of time [40]. The exposure to a higher concentration of virus due to prolonged contact in proximity is reflected from these case studies.

4. Genome Structure and Life Cycle

The incorporation of three major structural proteins defines the complex structure of the virus. The three proteins accounting for its structure are nucleocapsid protein N that is internally phosphorylated; glycoprotein S, representing the spike; and glycoprotein M, which is an unusual transmembrane protein [48]. The bulky spike, which is found in the viral envelope with peplomers ranging between 15 nm to 20 nm and is represented by the glycoprotein S of 200K [49]. Moreover, the minor transmembrane protein E is also present in the structural region. An envelope protein that performs both the functions of hemagglutination and esterase (HE) is found in several species of coronaviruses [50]. Possessing a genome size of 30 kb, these are single-stranded RNA viruses with a positive-sense RNA [51]. While the 5’ end is capped, the 3’ terminus is reportedly infectious and is polyadenylated. The expression of individual genes takes place through a complicated process, due to its bigger size, where at the 5’ end sequence, the release of the sets of nested mRNAs occurs. Extensive rearrangements facilitate the recombination of heterologous RNA. The leader RNA, which contains 65 to 98 nucleotides in an untranslated (UTR) sequence, occupies the 5’ end of the genome along with the 5’ end of the remaining sub-genomic mRNAs. At the 3’ end of the genome, the poly-A tail incorporates and follows another UTR region comprising 200 to 500 nucleotides. These two UTR regions are accountable for regulating the RNA transcription and replication processes. The genome of the coronavirus contains 7 to 14 open reading frames (ORFs). The beginning portion of the genome has gene one, which is 20–22 kb in length, and spreads across two-thirds of the genome. There are two ORFs, i.e., 1a and 1b, present in this portion, and these ORFs overlap and collectively function as the viral RNA polymerase (Pol). In the genome in this series, four significant structural proteins are incorporated, i.e., 5’–S (spike)–E (envelope)–M (membrane)–N (nucleocapsid)–3’ (Figure 2) [52]. The structural proteins are the key player in the virion’sassembly and defining the viral infectivity. The homotrimers of S proteins constitute the spikes on the viral surface and facilitate attachment to the host receptors [53,54]. There are three transmembrane domains in the M protein that play a key role in shaping the virions, promoting membrane curvature, and binding to the nucleocapsid [55,56]. The E protein takes part in the process of assembly and release of the virus along with its involvement in the viral pathogenesis [57,58]. The N protein has two domains with the potentiality of binding the virus RNA genomic material through different mechanisms. It has been reported that N protein can bind to nsp3 protein to tether the genome to the replicase-transcriptase complex (RTC) and packaging the encapsidated genome into virions, respectively [59,60,61]. This N protein has also been found as an antagonist of the interferon (IFN) and the viral encoded repressor of RNA interference to perquisite the process of viral replication [62]. Within these genes, there are various other ORFs coding for other non-structural proteins such as HE glycoprotein. Depending on the features of the gene order, method of expression, and nucleotide sequence, the marking of each gene in coronavirus is distinct, though all of them are conserved amongst the same serogroup. As other coronaviruses encode smaller ORFs in these regions, the SARS-CoV-2 differs from them in the 3’ region of the genome regarding the expression of 8 novel proteins that have been marked as accessory proteins, and these ORFs are presently investigated. Both the ORFs, i.e., 1a and 1b, are identically translated into two poly-proteins at the N-terminus while there is no production of the C-terminal identical polyproteins due to frame-shifting. ORF-1b encodes for a multifunctional helicase protein and the viral RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRp). This protein holds the 5’ triphosphatase, NTPase, and dNTPase activities. While all the structural proteins are not essentially required for the process of viral replication, inactivation of the viral function results from the deletion of one or more structural proteins. ORF-3a has a structural protein as one of its products has a role in the viral biogenesis as it is O-glycosylated, possessing the capability to bind S, N, M glycoproteins together, and is triple-membrane spanning in nature [63].
Coronaviruses encode for Mpro (main protease), also known as 3CLpro, which is a chymotrypsin-like protease and has similarities with the 3C protease of picornaviruses [64]. Sixteen non-structural proteins (nsps) are produced due to the remaining polyprotein being further processed by this protease. Among the nsp 1–16, most of the nsps have been found to have a role in the replication of these viruses. However, the functionality of some nsps is yet to be understood. The known functions of the 16 nsps have been summarized in Table 2. SARS-CoV species of coronavirus have the maximum presence of nsps. Nsp3 is one such nsp that has multiplefunctions and contains both protease and ADP-ribose 1” phosphatase activity [65]. The two proteins nsp7 and nsp8 formulate a cylindrical structure and play a crucial role in synthesizing RNA for coronavirus and single-strand RNA binding protein (nsp9), respectively [66].
The life cycle of these viruses is a multistep event. This includes five steps in the lifecycle of the virus within the host, i.e., attachment, penetration, biosynthesis, maturation, and release [59]. First, the viral S protein attaches to the Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme-2 (ACE2) receptor of the host, then it enters the host cells through membrane fusion or endocytosis. Following the entry, there is aproteolytic cleavage of the virus envelope resulting in the release of genomic RNA in the cytoplasm, and smaller RNAs (sub-genomic mRNAs) are made. The viral RNA enters intothe nucleus for replication once the viral contents enter the host cells. The viral mRNA is used in the biosynthesis procedure for producing viral proteins. The mRNAs further undergo translation procedures to produce several proteins (S, M, N, etc.), which are essentially required for viral assembly. The S, E, and M proteins enter the ER and result in the formation of nucleoprotein complex by combining N protein and genomic RNA (+strand). It is the ER-Golgi apparatus compartment wherein the complete virus particle (proteins and genomic RNA assembly) is formed. Thereafter, the latest viral particles are made and set off through the formation of vesicles and exocytosis, i.e., maturation (Figure 2).
Specific genes are present in all the coronaviruses in ORF1 downstream regions, which encode the proteins for nucleocapsid, viral replication, and spikes formation [102]. On the outer surface of the coronaviruses, there are glycoprotein spikes that facilitate the entry and attachment of the virus to the host cells. The virus can infect multiple hosts due to loose attachment of the receptor-binding domain (RBD) among the virus [103,104]. Other coronaviruses recognize carbohydrates or aminopeptidases as the key receptor for entry into human cells, while SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV recognize exopeptidases [105]. Cellular proteases determine the entry mechanism of a coronavirus which includes cathepsins and transmembrane protease serine 2 (TMPRSS2) and human airway trypsin-like protease (HAT), that split the spike protein and establish further penetration changes [106,107]. As a key receptor, MERS coronavirus employs dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), whileACE2 is required as a key receptor by SARScoronavirus and HCoV-NL63 [101,103]. A typical coronavirus structure with spike protein is possessed by SARS-CoV-2, and it expresses nucleoproteins, polyproteins, and membrane proteins such as papain-like protease, helicase, RNA polymerase, glycoprotein, 3-chymotrypsin-like protease, and accessory proteins [15,108]. To maintain the van der Waals forces, the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein comprisesa 3-D structure in the RBD region [109]. The critical lysine 31 residue on the human ACE2 receptor recognizes the 394 glutamine residue present in the SARS-CoV-2 RBD region [110]. The complete mechanism of SARS-CoV-2 pathogenicity, from attachment to replication, has been elaborated in Figure 2 and Figure 3.

5. Risk Factors of Coronavirus

Most incidences of SARS-CoV-2 infection are largely observed in adult male patients wherein the patient’s median age was between 34 years and 59 years [37,38,111,112]. People suffering from chronic comorbidities like cerebrovascular diseases, cardiovascular ailments, and diabetes are more likely to be infected by the SARS-CoV-2 [113]. In adults 60 years and above, there has been the highest proportion of severe cases along with individuals with existing comorbidities such as cerebrovascular diseases, cardiovascular ailments, and diabetes [37,111]. Co-infections caused by fungi and bacteria may also be associated with severe manifestations [113]. Interestingly, fewer cases of SARS-CoV-2 infection have been reported among children less than 15 years of age [37,38,111,112]. As per a study published on 29th January and conducted in Wuhan on 425 COVID-19 patients, no cases were reported in children under the age of 15 years [40,114]. However, as of March 14th, 2021 according to the American Academy of Pediatrics, the USA alone hosts 3,231,836 pediatric COVID-19 cases, and these cases contribute 13.2% (3,231,836/24,487,634) of all cases. Overall, there are 4294 cases per every 100,000 children in the entire USA population (data retrieved from https://services.aap.org/en/pages/2019-novel-coronavirus-covid-19-infections/children-and-covid-19-state-level-data-report/, accessed on 14 March 2021).
At a glance, most infected patients showed mild symptoms without fever or pneumonia, having a good prognosis [115]. Notably, a study discovered that a child was asymptomatic despite suffering from radiological ground-glass lung opacities [26]. In a nutshell, children can be less likely to get infected, or even if they are infected, they exhibit milder manifestations as compared to adults. It is more likely that the parents or guardians of such children might not seek treatment, which can lead to underestimation of the instances of the disease in this age group.

6. The Clinical Manifestations of COVID-19

Patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 exhibit clinical manifestations ranging from non-specific mild symptoms to severe pneumonia and damage of organ functions. Most common symptoms are cough (59.4–81.8%), dyspnea (3.2–55.0%), fever (77.4–98.6%), fatigue (38.1–69.6%), sputum production (28.2–56.5%), myalgia (11.1–34.8%), and headache (6.5–33.9%) [109,116]. Other lesser common symptoms include chest pain, hemoptysis, rhinorrhea, nausea, vomiting, sore throat, diarrhea, and conjunctive congestion. Though according to one study, out of the 140 confirmed COVID-19 patients, 39.6% of individuals exhibited gastrointestinal symptoms [117], and 10.1% of patients infected with COVID-19 exhibited gastrointestinal discomfort at its onset [111]. Though many patients developed a fever after hospitalization when they did not have any fever at the onset of the infection [116], and several patients with severe infection did not have a fever at all. Several clinical manifestations such as dry cough, headache, fever, sore throat, and dyspnea are common symptoms caused by all three viruses, i.e., SARS-CoV, MERS-CoV, and SARS-CoV-2. Though, COVID-19 patients exhibit lesser gastrointestinal involvement as compared to patients suffering from MERS and SARS [118]. Patients infected with MERS have a higher occurrence of renal failure, which, even though is characteristic, is not commonly found in other types of coronavirus infections in humans [119,120].

7. Effect of ACE-2 on SARS-CoV-2 Infection

A transmembrane trimetric glycoprotein that protrudes from the viral surface makes up the spike and determines the host tropism and the diversity of the coronaviruses. There are two functional sub-units of a spike where subunit S1 performs the function of binding to host cell receptors, and subunit S2 works for the fusion of cellular and viral membranes. The functional receptor for SARS-CoV has been identified as the ACE2 [121]. It has been shown through structural and functional analysis that ACE2 binds to spike for SARS-CoV-2 [122,123,124]. The expression for ACE2 was on the higher side in the heart, kidney lung, ileum, and bladder [125]. Inside the lung, lung epithelial cells had a higher expression of ACE2. This is associated with heart function and the development of systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus, and hypertension. Besides the above, it has been earmarked as the main receptor for coronaviruses, such as SARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2. SARS-CoV-2 (causing COVID-19 infection) is activated by binding the S glycoprotein to ACE2, which is expressed in the lungs and heart [126]. The virus SARS-CoV-2 has been reported to primarily attack alveolar epithelial cells, which results in severe respiratory symptoms (Figure 4). These symptoms have been reported to have a severe exhibition in cardiovascular disease patients, and this might be linked with increased secretion of ACE2 among these patients compared with healthy individuals. It can be noted that ACE2 levels can be upregulated by using renin-angiotensin–aldosterone system inhibitors [127]. Since ACE2 has been found as the functional receptor for SARS-CoV-2 infection, it is important to be vigilant for the potential effects of antihypertensive treatment using ACE inhibitors or angiotensinreceptor blockers (ARBs) in patients with COVID-19. The switching of the antihypertensive agent from ACE inhibitors/ARBs in COVID-19-infected individuals with hypertension as an underlying disease to other treating agents is seemingly controversial and requires adducing solidly for the same [128].
Recently, it has been found that there was no significant difference in the expression level of the ACE2 in individuals with pre-existing comorbidities when compared to healthy populations. However, long-term smoking has been speculated as a risk factor for SARS-CoV-2 infection following the reporting of the elevated expression of ACE2 among cigarette smokers. The analytical findings of ACE2 in SARS-CoV-2-infected cells suggested the involvement of ACE2 receptors to have a regulatory role in the immune response, cytokine secretion, and replication of virus at post-infectious state, also acting as a binding receptor to facilitate viral entry. Indeed, these findings may render potential insight into the pathogenesis of COVID-19 in the purview of designing effective therapeutic strategies for battling SARS-CoV-2 infection.
It requires further investigation to determine whether SARS-CoV-2 binds to an additional target. The spike protein undergoes protease cleavage after the host protein binds to SARS-CoV-2. A model was proposed to activate spike protein of SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV comprising a two-step sequential protease cleavage, which, for priming, comprises cleavage at the S1/S2 cleavage site and, for activation, cleavage at the S1 site, which is within the S2 subunit and is a position that is adjacent to a fusion peptide [129,130,131]. S1 and S2 subunits remain non-covalently bound. The distal S1 subunit contributes to the prefusion state after cleavage at the S1/S2 cleavage site and stabilization of the membrane-anchored S2 subunit [123]. Presumably, the spike for the membrane fusion is activated by the subsequent cleavage at the S′2 site through conformational and irreversible changes. This spike of the coronavirus is unusual amongst the viruses because it can be cleaved and activated through a wide range of varied proteases [132]. The existence of the furin cleavage site at the S1/S2 site, is a characteristic that is unique to SARS-CoV-2. During the biosynthesis, the S1/S2 site of the SARS-CoV-2 is completely subjected to cleavage, which is in drastic contrast to the SARS-CoV spike that has been included in the assembly without cleavage [123]. The cleavage was subjected upon the S1/D2 site through varied proteases such as cathepsin L and TMPRSS2, and the virus is made extremely pathogenic by the ubiquitous expression of furin [131,133].

8. Immunopathological Mechanisms of SARS-CoV-2 Infection

When considered at the whole-genome level, close relations have been found between SARS-CoV-2 and bat-SL-CoVZC45 and bat-SL-CoVZXC21, albeit its receptor binding is identical to that of SARS-CoV [134]. Though, it is pertinent to mention here that species specificity is not solely determined by receptor recognition. After binding to the receptive receptor, the innate immune response is generated to counteract the entry of the SARS-CoV-2 into host cells. The innate immune signaling evasion or inhibition is necessary for infecting its new host and enhancing viral productivity. Though, how SARS-CoV-2 has driven the pathogenesis as well as evade the immune response is still unknown. SARS-CoV-2 seemingly shares an identical pathological mechanistic to that of SARS-CoV, as SARS and COVID-19 exhibit similar clinical features [38]. While responding to the SARS-CoV-2 infections, for inhibiting the replication of the virus, expression of IFN-stimulated genes (ISGs) is stimulated by the type I interferon (IFN) system.
SARS-CoV-2 encodes over eight viral antagonists that evade the ISG effector function and modulate the induction of cytokines and IFN to overcome the antiviral activity [135]. To inhibit the dissemination and replication of the virus, the host immune system responds via cellular antiviral activity and plays a critical role in subjugating inflammation. However, there is a likelihood of pathological implications coming into play due to the lytic effects of the virus on host cells and exacerbated immune response. The studies that include fever, dry cough, breathlessness, hypoxia, and severe pneumonia have identified the symptomatology in COVID-19 diseased patients [38,113]. Some patients witnessed rapid progression combined with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS), Systemic Inflammatory Response Syndrome (SIRS), and Multi-Organ Dysfunction Syndrome (MODS) that lead to death in approximately 10% of the patients due to the presence of ACE2 receptor in cardiac, renal, and hepatic tissues [113,136](Figure 3). The evolution of diffuse alveolar damage is due to the increased levels of IFN-γ-induced protein 10 (IP10), pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, -2, -6, -8, -10, and -12), interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP1), and macrophage inflammatory proteins-1A (MIP1A), in patients diagnosed with SARS [137] (Figure 3). A similar picture of immunopathology has been observed in patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Significantly higher levels of IP10, MCP1, GSCF, and TNF-α have witnessed in patients admitted to the ICU (intensive care unit) as compared to non-ICU patients, suggesting that the underlying cause of the severity of the disease can be cytokine storm [38].
Against all expectations, an uncommon phenomenon was seen during the acute phase of the viral infection wherein IL-10 and IL-4 anti-inflammatory cytokines were also increased in those patients [38]. One more interesting finding that has been explained before was that older males are more likely to be infected with SARS-CoV-2 as compared to children, with rare cases being reported in that age group [38,113]. With SARS-CoV-2, the same observation was found in primate models where the aged cynomolgus macaque was found to be more likely to be infected by the virus as compared to young adults [138]. The identification of the host genes of SARS-CoV-2 and virulence factors that facilitate virus crossing of species-specific barrier mandates further studies to recognize the cause of the lethal disease in humans.

9. Diagnosis of COVID-19

There are several ways to diagnose and test the impact of SARS-CoV-2 infection such as complete hematological profiling with cellular counts; functional assays of the liver and kidney with the estimate of their enzyme markers and urea levels, respectively; detection of the pathogenic DNA from quantitative PCR or the nucleic acid amplification test; inflammatory markers such as CK-MB, ESR, CRP, D-dimer, ferritin, IL-6, and pro-calcitonin; and radiological investigations such as chest radiographs, ultrasound, and CT. Quantitative real-time PCR is the mainstay in diagnosing COVID-19 due to its sensitivity, specificity, and feasibility as compared to viral culture. It is the gold standard diagnostic approach with high sensitivity to the viral detection. Elevated procalcitonin levels may also show a superinfection of SARS-CoV-2, as the viral infection may cause a superinfection with bacteria. Similarly, increased levels of biological markers such as IL-6, CRP, ferritin, LDH, D-dimer, and ESR may signify the critical stage of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further, estimating the complete blood picture report including the count of RBC, WBC, and platelets is another approach to examine SARS-CoV-2 infection. Common laboratory abnormalities present amongst the patients suffering from COVID-19 include prolonged prothrombin time, lymphopenia, and elevated lactate dehydrogenase [37,111,113]. Compared to non-ICU patients, patients admitted to ICU exhibited higher laboratory abnormalities [38,111]. Some patients exhibited elevation in levels of creatine kinase, aminotransferase, creatinine, and C-reactive protein [26,37,38]. Normal serum procalcitonin levels were seen in most of the patients [37,38,111]. High levels of IFN-γ, IP10, IL1β, and MCP1 are present in COVID-19 patients. Importantly, ICU-admitted patients tend to have higher levels of MCP1A, MIP1A, granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (GCSF), IP10, and TNF-α [38]. Further, there can be variations of radiology findings in patients according to immunity status, disease progression, comorbidity, age, and initial medical intervention [139]. In a study conducted amongst the initial 41 cases of 2019-nCoV infection, all 41 patients were suffering from pneumonia, and chest computer tomography (CTscan) showed abnormal findings [38]. In another study comprising six patients, patients who showed multifocal patchy opacities with ground-glass appearances in the peripheral sections of the lungs also exhibited abnormalities on the chest CTscan [26]. As per the data derived from studies, consolidative pulmonary opacities and bilateral pulmonary parenchymal ground-glass are the typical findings of chest CTscans [37,38,111,112,113,140]. Lung consolidation was noted predominantly among patients five or more days from the onset of disease and those who were 50 years or older compared to those at four or fewer days from onset and those who were 50 years or younger [141]. Manifested by extension and increasing density of the lung opacities, the progression of the disease was noted to be mild to moderate as the course of the disease continued [142]. Sub-segmental and bilateral multiple lobular areas of consolidation are the common findings on chest CTscan in ICU-admitted patients [38]. In a study conducted amongst 99 patients, imaging examination revealed pneumothorax in one patient [113]. The overall diagnosis methods are presented in Figure 5.

10. Therapeutic Strategies

Unfortunately, to date, no single medication has been reported or proposed to combat the infective viral load of SARS-CoV-2. However, previous strategies for developing proper medications to pulverize SARS-CoV can be extrapolated to COVID-19 infection effectively. Scientists, several research groups, and clinicians across the globe are working towards finding effective medications that can curtail or eliminate the viral load of SARS-CoV-2. Yet, a definitive treatment to fight COVID-19 needs to be announced across the nations. Further, identifying and implementing various natural products, antiviral drugs, anti-malarial drugs, and vaccines can aid in the treatment of the ongoing pandemic (Figure 6). Social distancing, hand washing, self-isolation, fluid management, oxygen therapy (supportive care), and antibiotics treatment for secondary bacterial infections have been recommended [143]. The deployment of primary prevention of risk factors (social distancing, hand washing, face masks, and other infection control measures) hasbeen addressed and propagated to contain the novel coronaviral agent among communities [144]. Since proper evidence-based treatment was not available for COVID-19, the WHO has framed the guidelines to manage the disease based on triage. Once sepsis in COVID-19 patients is suspected, the rational use of multiple antibiotics and glucocorticoids to control the cytokine storm was suggested. The routine use of glucocorticoid administration is not recommended until and unless it is definitively indicated [144]. Corticosteroid treatment is also not prescribed, as evidenced by several clinical studies [145]. A few studies suggested that the administration of intravenous immunoglobulin might help in combating SARS-CoV-2 infection in severely ill patients [146].

10.1. Antiviral Drugs

There are no proven studies available to state that anti-viral treatment can combat SARS-CoV-2 infections. Initially, anti-viral drugs, broad-spectrum antibiotics, and effective nebulization of IFN-α had been utilized to curtail this load; though, only a few drugs have displayed their potential impact against the virus [147,148,149]. Aligning to prior therapeutics investigations for treating MERS and SARS infection, drugs are being evaluated [150]. In general, there is a lack of strong evidence that antiviral drugs can considerably improve the clinical outcomes. Researchers have also used the anti-influenza drug oseltamivir in combination with empirical antibiotics as a cocktail in the management of COVID-19 patients [38]. Similarly, in the US, Remdesivir developed for the Ebola virus has been recently utilized along with other antimicrobials to combat COVID-19 [151]. Certain potential clinical advantages were observed on a few COVID-19 patients when administered with the combination of Arbidol/ShufengJiedu Capsule (SFJDC) and Ritonavir/Lopinavir [111]. To examine the safety and effectiveness of Lopinavir/Ritonavir and interferon-2b in COVID-19 patients, a clinical study is under trial [143]. A broad-spectrum antiviral drug, Remdesivir, a nucleotide analog RNA polymerase inhibitor, has shown efficacy against SARS-CoV-2 in in-vitro and in-vivo studies and clinical trials [12,122]. It has been reported that patients suffering from coronaviruses were affirmed as clinically recovered after the administration of Remdesivir. This antiviral drug alone or in combination with chloroquine or IFN-β significantly blocks SARS-CoV-2 replication [151,152]. Intravenous Remdesivir cured the first case of COVID-19 reported from the USA, along with other supportive care [12]. However, the establishment of definitive effects of Remdesivir on SARS-CoV-2 further warrants detailed research work in animals and clinical sample-based settings. A range of other antiviral drugs is presently under evaluation against SARS-CoV-2 infection. In vitro studies on Nitazoxanide, Nafamostat, Penciclovir, Ribavirin, Arbidol, Favipiravir, Ritonavir, Baricitinib, and AAK1 showed moderate results against COVID-19 [111,151,152,153]. Similarly, several other combinations, including combining traditional Chinese medicines with antiviral or antibiotics, have been evaluated in humans and mice against SARS-CoV-2-induced infection [152]. Additionally, the drugs from existing antiviral categories hold scope for future prospects [154,155] (Table 3).

10.2. Vaccines

Usually, vaccine preparation is a three-phase (I, II, III) trial-based procedure. The conduction of phase I trial aims at checking the generation of immune response by enrolling only multiples of 10 (approximately 30–40) individuals. A successful phase I trial proceeds further to phase II with the further enrollment of hundreds of individuals, wherein the aim is to identify the dosage concentrations, immunogenicity, and safety. Finally, the phase III trial will include the enrollment of thousands of individuals for measuring the efficacy of the vaccine in terms of its immune response against the targeted disease infection. Currently, multiple companies/universities are investigating the development of a vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 with the Coalition for Epidemic Preparedness Innovations [174]. Here we have collated the information on various vaccines that are approved (Table 4) and underdevelopment (Table 5) along with their respective details.

11. Other Promising Therapeutics

In China, the medical researchers collected plasma from COVID-19 recovered patients and re-infused it into clinically ill patients who showed complete recovery from COVID-19 disease with good pulmonary compliance. Recently, CR3022 (monoclonal antibody) binding with the spike RBD of SARS-CoV-2 has also been identified, and this is probably due to the antibody’s epitope not overlapping with the divergent ACE2 receptor-binding motif. With the pieces of the available evidence on CR3022 (monoclonal antibody), it can be plausibly used as a therapeutic to treat COVID-19 [175]. Recently, Remdesivir, lopinavir, emetine, and homoharringtonine have also reported inhibiting SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro [176]. Further, the sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 to recombinant human interferons α and β (IFNα/β) has also been observed. Treatment with IFN-α or IFN-β at a concentration of 50 international units (IU) per milliliter reduces the viral titers by 3.4 log or over 4 log, respectively, in Vero cells. The noted EC50 of IFN-α and IFN-β treatment is 1.35 IU/mL and 0.76 IU/mL, respectively, in Vero cells. These results suggest the higher sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 compared to other human pathogenic viruses, including SARS-CoV. Overall, this study shows the potential efficacy of human type-I IFN in suppressing SARS-CoV-2 infection, a finding which could inform future treatment options for COVID-19 [177]. Further, usingneutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 (anti-SARS-CoVnAbs) can be an alternative approach to prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection [178].
The utilization of nucleotide analogs can be another potential approach to treat COVID-19. These nucleotide analogs have the potential to evade the exonuclease activity of the virus. In this context, it is noteworthy that the prodrugs of five of these nucleotide analogs (Cidofovir, Abacavir, Valganciclovir/Ganciclovir, Stavudine, and Entecavir) are FDA-approved medications for treating other viral infections with well-established safety profiles. To reiterate, following the demonstration of the inhibiting potency of viral replication in cell culture, the candidature molecules are subjected to being evaluated as potential therapies for COVID-19 [179]. Further, type 1 interferons can be more helpful in treating COVID-19. The experience and knowledge inferred from the IFN-I treatment against SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV prove valuable in the selection of potential treatments against SARS-CoV-2 [180].
Interestingly, Ivermectin, a FDA-approved anti-parasitic agent, has previously showed broad-spectrum antiviral activity in vitro, as an inhibitor of the causative virus (SARS-CoV-2), with a single addition to Vero-hSLAM cells 2 h post-infection with SARS-CoV-2 able to effect ~5000-fold reduction in viral RNA at 48 h. Therefore, this agent warrants further investigation to perquisite humans [166].
Due to the drastic improvement in the field of molecular biology and translational science, cellular therapy has emerged as a potential option for combating COVID-19 [181]. Cellular therapy deals with the usage of autologous or allogenic pooled conditioned stored cells to treat the disease and to regenerate the damaged cells, tissues, or organs. Researchers have thrown the limelight on the usage of various cells like bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells, adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells, and placental-derived mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) to curb COVID-19 pneumonia. A total of 53 clinical trials have been in the recruiting status and are ongoing. The results of these trials are awaited (ClinicalTrials.Gov). Despite the advantage of regenerating the damaged pulmonary epithelium, MSCs have quite a list of challenges when administering to patients with COVID-19. The challenges in the usage of cellular therapy are isolation, harvesting, and characterization of cells, preparation protocols, route of administration, dose, and frequency of treatment, immune privilege nature, and the expected outcome of the cells that have been transfused. Outweighing the challenges, cellular therapy has a ray of hope to curb COVID-19 pneumonia.
The natural metabolites of the different chemical agents present a ray of hope, and promising data on virtual molecular docking hasbeen enumerated in Table 6. Despite the distinct molecular structure, several chemical agents (flavanones, flavonols, alkaloids, fatty acids, quinones, terpenes, and steroids) possess similar docking forces to the repurposed drugs (e.g., Remdesivir and Chloroquine) with proteins/signals/receptors involved in SARS-CoV-2 replication, including ACE2, 3CLpro, and TMPRSS-2. It can be inferred from the docking evaluation that inhibitors of ACE2 retard the binding capacity of SARS-CoV-2 and arrest the viral entry into pulmonary epithelium [182,183]. Considering the blockade of SARS-CoV-2 infection through the ACE2 receptor, the lowest affinity was possessed by Flavolignan silybin. Rahma et al. [184] suggested 12 natural metabolites having binding energy with TPMRSS2 ranging from −11.06 to−14.69 kcal mol. The search for TMPRSS2 inhibitors is lowered within the major replication proteins, despite that molecular docking shows another strategy to be investigated for treating COVID-19 [133]. Notably, the role of TMPRSS2 in inoculation and replication of influenza virus, cancer, and SARS-CoV-1 [185] has been well-documented. Besides, researchers are more promptly searchingfor strategies to target the inhibition of the main protein (3CLpro) of SARS-CoV-2, as it could prevent the inoculation of the virus in the host [186,187,188]. Although the 3CLpro is an enzyme specific to the virus, the one within SARS-CoV-2 has a large structural similarity with the one present in SARS-CoV-1 (96.08%) [182]. In silico analysis demonstrated that the terpenoids Bonducellpin D and Caesalmin B and the flavonoid 5,7-dimethoxy flavanone-40-O-b-d-glucopyranoside have binding affinities with 3CLpro of SARS-CoV-1, SARS-CoV-2, and MERS-CoV ranging from −8 to −11 kcal mol−1, an outstanding value compared to repurposed drugs (Table 6).

12. Obstacles to Research on COVID-19 Pathogenesis

Animal models serve a critical role in unveiling pathogenicity mechanisms of the virus, from the entrance to the transmission, and targeting therapeutic strategies. Earlier, to check the replication of SARS-CoV-2, symptoms of serious infections were depicted by different animal models [201]. In small animals, MERS-CoV pathogenesis was not observed in contrast to SARS-CoV-2. As a result of the non-compatibility of the DPP4 receptor, mice are not at risk of infection with MERS-coronavirus [202]. The infectious pathogenicity of SARS-CoV-2 can be determined by the animal models as used in SARS-CoV-2 since both the viruses share 80% of the genomes and recognize ACE2 receptors. Hamsters that have been genetically modified with CRISPR or TALEN or other small animals can be used for studying the novel coronaviruses’ pathogenicity. Replication of SARS-CoV-2 has been reported as a cause for severe ailments in rats (f344), wherein at spike glycoprotein, a mutation was revealed by the sequence analysis [203]. Therefore, it can emerge as a suitable alternate option for the development of spike glycoprotein targeting therapeutics against novel coronaviruses. Clinical isolates and mice models were used recently for the development of a therapeutic strategy against COVID-19 induced by SARS-CoV-2 [111,152]. Artificial Intelligence prediction has also been used in a similar study for investigating the drug’s inhibitory role against SARS-CoV-2 [153]. Randomized clinical trials were also conducted on patients suffering from SARS-CoV-2 [147,151,152]. The investigation into the invivo mechanisms relevant to the pathogenesis of COVID-19 mandates the global collaboration of scientists for designing an appropriate model.

13. Conclusions

The sudden sprouting of COVID-19 cases across the globe has questioned the solidarity of the medical fraternity. Apart from lungs, viral infections-mediated inflammatory state and immonumodulation may have potentially adverse impacts on several other organs/organ systems, too [204,205]. The sudden outset of this viral infection has brought people into captivity across the nations. The day-to-day altering trends in symptomatology and presentation have pacified the molecular research and developmental sciences to come up with safer and effective therapeutic agents and vaccines. To date, we are comprehending and battling this pandemic with no proven therapeutics. The need of the hour is to consider a holistic approach and render supportive care, as per the presenting severity of the case. While combating a pandemic, it is of utmost importance for health care professionals to keep themselves updated with the current and emerging therapeutic trends for treating the disease with greater effectiveness [206,207,208,209,210]. A multidisciplinary team must mitigate the secondary waves of the pandemic with all the necessary precautions. At the same time, it is equally important to optimize novel ideology of cellular therapy protocols in adjunct to the development of vaccines, as these have the potential to prove as the positive shades of a rainbow amidst the storm of COVID-19 pandemic. Further research on the definitive management protocols by conducting randomized controlled trials is greatly needed for the hour because safety and efficacy parameters need to be concretely investigated.

Author Contributions

N.K.J. designed and wrote this review with input from all other authors who contributed to studies that led to the view presented in this manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, C.; Horby, P.W.; Hayden, F.G.; Gao, G.F. A novel coronavirus outbreak of global health concern. Lancet 2020, 395, 470–473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Li, H.; Liu, S.-M.; Yu, X.-H.; Tang, S.-L.; Tang, C.-K. Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Current status and future perspectives. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents 2020, 55, 105951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Guo, Y.-R.; Cao, Q.-D.; Hong, Z.-S.; Tan, Y.-Y.; Chen, S.-D.; Jin, H.-J.; Tan, K.-S.; Wang, D.-Y.; Yan, Y. The origin, transmission and clinical therapies on coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak—An update on the status. Mil. Med Res. 2020, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  4. Zheng, Y.-Y.; Ma, Y.-T.; Zhang, J.-Y.; Xie, X. COVID-19 and the cardiovascular system. Nat. Rev. Cardiol. 2020, 17, 259–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Cinatl, J.; Morgenstern, B.; Bauer, G.; Chandra, P.; Rabenau, H.; Doerr, H. Treatment of SARS with human interferons. Lancet 2003, 362, 293–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Florindo, H.F.; Kleiner, R.; Vaskovich-Koubi, D.; Acúrcio, R.C.; Carreira, B.; Yeini, E.; Tiram, G.; Liubomirski, Y.; Satchi-Fainaro, R. Immune-mediated approaches against COVID-19. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2020, 15, 630–645. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chan, J.F.; Chan, K.-H.; Kao, R.Y.; To, K.K.; Zheng, B.-J.; Li, C.P.; Li, P.T.; Dai, J.; Mok, F.K.; Chen, H.; et al. Broad-spectrum antivirals for the emerging Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Infect. 2013, 67, 606–616. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Cheng, K.-W.; Cheng, S.-C.; Chen, W.-Y.; Lin, M.-H.; Chuang, S.-J.; Cheng, I.-H.; Sun, C.-Y.; Chou, C.-Y. Thiopurine analogs and mycophenolic acid synergistically inhibit the papain-like protease of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. Antivir. Res. 2015, 115, 9–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, Y.; Sun, Y.; Wu, A.; Xu, S.; Pan, R.; Zeng, C.; Jin, X.; Ge, X.; Shi, Z.; Ahola, T.; et al. Coronavirus nsp10/nsp16 methyltransferase can be targeted by nsp10-derived peptide in vitro and in vivo to reduce replication and pathogenesis. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 8416–8427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Mair-Jenkins, J.; Saavedra-Campos, M.; Baillie, J.K.; Cleary, P.; Khaw, F.M.; Lim, W.S.; Makki, S.; Rooney, K.D.; Nguyen-Van-Tam, J.S.; Beck, C.R. The effectiveness of convalescent plasma and hyperimmune immunoglobulin for the treatment of severe acute respiratory infections of viral etiology: A systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. J. Infect. Dis. 2015, 211, 80–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Graham, R.L.; Donaldson, E.F.; Baric, R.S. A decade after SARS: Strategies for controlling emerging coronaviruses. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2013, 11, 836–848. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. De Wit, E.; Feldmann, F.; Cronin, J.; Jordan, R.; Okumura, A.; Thomas, T.; Scott, D.; Cihlar, T.; Feldmann, H. Prophylactic and therapeutic remdesivir (GS-5734) treatment in the rhesus macaque model of MERS-CoV infection. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2020, 3, 2019–2208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Burrell, C.J.; Howard, C.R.; Murphy, F.A. Fenner and White’s Medical Virology; Elsevier BV: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  14. Burrell, A.J.; Pellegrini, B.; Salimi, F.; Begum, H.; Broadley, T.; Campbell, L.T.; Cheng, A.C.; Cheung, W.; Cooper, D.J.; Earnest, A.; et al. Outcomes for patients with COVID-19 admitted to Australian intensive care units during the first four months of the pandemic. Med. J. Aust. 2021, 214, 23–30. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Zhou, P.; Yang, X.L.; Wang, X.G.; Hu, B.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, W.; Si, H.R.; Zhu, Y.; Li, B.; Huang, C.L.; et al. A pneumonia outbreak associated with a new coronavirus of probable bat origin. Nature 2020, 579, 270–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  16. Hughes, J.; Wilson, M.; Luby, S.; Gurley, E.; Hossain, M. Transmission of human infection with Nipah virus. Clin. Infect. Dis. 2009, 49, 1743–1748. [Google Scholar]
  17. Kan, B.; Wang, M.; Jing, H.; Xu, H.; Jiang, X.; Yan, M.; Liang, W.; Zheng, H.; Wan, K.; Liu, Q.; et al. Molecular Evolution Analysis and Geographic Investigation of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus-Like Virus in Palm Civets at an Animal Market and on Farms. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 11892–11900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  18. Zheng, B.J.; Guan, Y.; Wong, K.H.; Zhou, J.; Wong, K.L.; Young, B.W.Y.; Lu, L.W.; Lee, S.S. SARS-related Virus Predating SARS Outbreak, Hong Kong. Emerg. Infect. Dis. 2004, 10, 176–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Shi, Z.; Hu, Z. A review of studies on animal reservoirs of the SARS coronavirus. Virus Res. 2008, 133, 74–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Memish, Z.A.; Zumla, A.I.; Al-Hakeem, R.F.; Al-Rabeeah, A.A.; Stephens, G.M. Family Cluster of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infections. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013, 368, 2487–2494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Annan, A.; Baldwin, H.J.; Corman, V.M.; Klose, S.M.; Owusu, M.; Nkrumah, E.E.; Badu, E.K.; Anti, P.; Agbenyega, O.; Meyer, B. Human betacorona virus 2c EMC/2012–related viruses in bats, Ghana and Europe. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013, 19, 456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Huynh, J.; Li, S.; Yount, B.; Smith, A.; Sturges, L.; Olsen, J.C.; Nagel, J.; Johnson, J.B.; Agnihothram, S.; Gates, J.E.; et al. Evidence Supporting a Zoonotic Origin of Human Coronavirus Strain NL63. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 12816–12825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  23. Lau, S.K.P.; Li, K.S.M.; Tsang, A.K.L.; Lam, C.S.F.; Ahmed, S.; Chen, H.; Chan, K.-H.; Woo, P.C.Y.; Yuen, K.-Y. Genetic Characterization of Betacoronavirus Lineage C Viruses in Bats Reveals Marked Sequence Divergence in the Spike Protein of Pipistrellus Bat Coronavirus HKU5 in Japanese Pipistrelle: Implications for the Origin of the Novel Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 8638–8650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  24. Chan, J.F.-W.; Kok, K.-H.; Zhu, Z.; Chu, H.; To, K.K.-W.; Yuan, S.; Yuen, K.-Y. Genomic characterization of the 2019 novel human-pathogenic coronavirus isolated from a patient with atypical pneumonia after visiting Wuhan. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 2020, 9, 221–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Lu, H.; Stratton, C.W.; Tang, Y. Outbreak of pneumonia of unknown etiology in Wuhan, China: The mystery and the miracle. J. Med. Virol. 2020, 92, 401–402. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Chan, J.F.-W.; Yuan, S.; Kok, K.-H.; To, K.K.-W.; Chu, H.; Yang, J.; Xing, F.; Liu, J.; Yip, C.C.-Y.; Poon, R.W.-S.; et al. A familial cluster of pneumonia associated with the 2019 novel coronavirus indicating person-to-person transmission: A study of a family cluster. Lancet 2020, 395, 514–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Fan, Y.; Zhao, K.; Shi, Z.-L.; Zhou, P. Bat Coronaviruses in China. Viruses 2019, 11, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  28. Mahase, E. China coronavirus: What do we know so far? BMJ 2020, 368, m308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Hui, D.S.; Azhar, E.I.; Madani, T.A.; Ntoumi, F.; Kock, R.; Dar, O.; Ippolito, G.; Mchugh, T.D.; Memish, Z.A.; Drosten, C.; et al. The continuing 2019-nCoV epidemic threat of novel coronaviruses to global health—The latest 2019 novel coronavirus outbreak in Wuhan, China. Int. J. Infect. Dis. 2020, 91, 264–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Rodriguez-Morales, A.J.; Bonilla-Aldana, D.K.; Balbin-Ramon, G.J.; Rabaan, A.A.; Sah, R.; Paniz-Mondolfi, A.; Pagliano, P.; Esposito, S. History is repeating itself: Probable zoonotic spillover as the cause of the 2019 novel coronavirus epidemic. Infez. Med. 2020, 28, 3–5. [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu, X.-W.; Wu, X.-X.; Jiang, X.-G.; Xu, K.-J.; Ying, L.-J.; Ma, C.-L.; Li, S.-B.; Wang, H.-Y.; Zhang, S.; Gao, H.-N.; et al. Clinical findings in a group of patients infected with the 2019 novel coronavirus (SARS-Cov-2) outside of Wuhan, China: Retrospective case series. BMJ 2020, 368, m606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Ison, M.G.; Hirsch, H.H. Community-acquired respiratory viruses in transplant patients: Diversity, impact, unmet clinicalneeds. Clin. Microbiol. Rev. 2019, 32, e00042-19. [Google Scholar]
  33. Kramer, A.; Schwebke, I.; Kampf, G. How long do nosocomial pathogens persist on inanimate surfaces? A systematic review. BMC Infect. Dis. 2006, 6, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Kampf, G.; Todt, D.; Pfaender, S.; Steinmann, E. Persistence of coronaviruses on inanimate surfaces and their inactivation with biocidal agents. J. Hosp. Infect. 2020, 104, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. Rothe, C.; Schunk, M.; Sothmann, P.; Bretzel, G.; Froeschl, G.; Wallrauch, C.; Zimmer, T.; Thiel, V.; Janke, C.; Guggemos, W. Transmission of 2019-nCoV infection from an asymptomatic contact in Germany. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 970–971. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  36. Kupferschmidt, K. Study claiming new coronavirus can be transmitted by people without symptoms was flawed. Science 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Bai, Y.; Yao, L.; Wei, T.; Tian, F.; Jin, D.Y.; Chen, L.; Wang, M. Presumed Asymptomatic Carrier Transmission of COVID-19. JAMA 2020, 323, 1406–1407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  38. Huang, C.; Wang, Y.; Li, X.; Ren, L.; Zhao, J.; Hu, Y.; Zhang, L.; Fan, G.; Xu, J.; Gu, X. Clinical features of patients infected with 2019 novel coronavirus in Wuhan, China. Lancet 2020, 395, 497–506. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Chu, D.K.W.; Pan, Y.; Cheng, S.M.S.; Hui, K.P.Y.; Krishnan, P.; Liu, Y.; Ng, D.Y.M.; Wan, C.K.C.; Yang, P.; Wang, Q.; et al. Molecular Diagnosis of a Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Causing an Outbreak of Pneumonia. Clin. Chem. 2020, 66, 549–555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  40. Li, Q.; Guan, X.; Wu, P.; Qun, L.; Xuhua, G.; Peng, W.; Xiaoye, W.; Lei, Z.; Yeqing, T.; Ruiqi, R.; et al. Early transmission dynamics in Wuhan, China, of Novel Coronavirus—Infected pneumonia. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1199–1207. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. WHO (World Health Organization). Clinical Management of Severe Acute Respiratory Infection When Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Infection Is Suspected: Interim Guidance; WHO: New York, NY, USA, 2020; pp. 1–19. [Google Scholar]
  42. Bauch, C.; Oraby, T. Assessing the pandemic potential of MERS-CoV. Lancet 2013, 382, 662–664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Riley, S.; Fraser, C.; Donnelly, C.A.; Ghani, A.C.; Abu-Raddad, L.J.; Hedley, A.J.; Leung, G.M.; Ho, L.-M.; Lam, T.-H.; Thach, T.Q.; et al. Transmission Dynamics of the Etiological Agent of SARS in Hong Kong: Impact of Public Health Interventions. Science 2003, 300, 1961–1966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yang, Y.; Sugimoto, J.D.; Halloran, M.E.; Basta, N.E.; Chao, D.L.; Matrajt, L.; Potter, G.; Kenah, E.; Longini, I.M. The Transmissibility and Control of Pandemic Influenza A (H1N1) Virus. Science 2009, 326, 729–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  45. Liu, Y.; Gayle, A.A.; Wilder-Smith, A.; Rocklöv, J. The reproductive number of COVID-19 is higher compared to SARS coronavirus. J. Travel Med. 2020, 27, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  46. Kucharski, A.; Althaus, C. The role of superspreading in Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) transmission. Euro Surveill. 2015, 20, 21167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Chen, H.; Guo, J.; Wang, C.; Luo, F.; Yu, X.; Zhang, W.; Li, J.; Zhao, D.; Xu, D.; Gong, Q.; et al. Clinical characteristics and intrauterine vertical transmission potential of COVID-19 infection in nine pregnant women: A retrospective review of medical records. Lancet 2020, 395, 809–815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. McBride, R.; van Zyl, M.; Fielding, B.C. The Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Is a Multifunctional Protein. Viruses 2014, 6, 2991–3018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  49. Coutard, B.; Valle, C.; de Lamballerie, X.; Canard, B.; Seidah, N.G.; Decroly, E. The spike glycoprotein of the new coronavirus 2019-nCoV contains a furin-like cleavage site absent in CoV of 350 the same clade. Antivir. Res. 2020, 176, 104742. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Klausegger, A.; Strobl, B.; Regl, G.; Kaser, A.; Luytjes, W.; Vlasak, R. Identification of a Coronavirus Hemagglutinin-Esterase with a Substrate Specificity Different from Those of Influenza C Virus and Bovine Coronavirus. J. Virol. 1999, 73, 3737–3743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  51. Bárcena, M.; Oostergetel, G.T.; Bartelink, W.; Faas, F.G.; Verkleij, A.; Rottier, P.J.; Koster, A.J.; Bosch, B.J. Cryo-electron tomography of mouse hepatitis virus: Insight to the structure of the coronavirion. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 582–587. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Mortola, E.; Roy, P. Efficient assembly and release of SARS coronavirus-like particles by a heterologous expression system. FEBS Lett. 2004, 576, 174–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  53. Beniac, D.R.; Andonov, A.; Grudeski, E.; Booth, T.F. Architecture of the SARS coronavirus prefusion spike. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2006, 13, 751–752. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  54. Delmas, B.; Laude, H. Assembly of coronavirus spike protein into trimers and its role in epitope expression. J. Virol. 1990, 64, 5367–5375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Nal, B. Differential maturation and subcellular localization of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus surface proteins S, M and E. J. Gen. Virol. 2005, 86, 1423–1434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  56. Neuman, B.W.; Kiss, G.; Kunding, A.H.; Bhella, D.; Baksh, M.F.; Connelly, S.; Droese, B.; Klaus, J.P.; Makino, S.; Sawicki, S.G.; et al. A structural analysis of M protein in coronavirus assembly and morphology. J. Struct. Biol. 2011, 174, 11–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. De Diego, M.L.; Álvarez, E.; Almazán, F.; Rejas, M.T.; Lamirande, E.; Roberts, A.; Shieh, W.-J.; Zaki, S.R.; Subbarao, K.; Enjuanes, L. A Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus That Lacks the E Gene Is Attenuated In Vitro and In Vivo. J. Virol. 2006, 81, 1701–1713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Nieto-Torres, J.L.; de Diego, M.L.; Verdiá-Báguena, C.; Jimenez-Guardeño, J.M.; Regla-Nava, J.A.; Fernandez-Delgado, R.; Castaño-Rodriguez, C.; Alcaraz, A.; Torres, J.; Aguilella, V.M. Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus envelope protein ion channel activity promotes virus fitness and pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog. 2014, 10, e1004077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Fehr, A.R.; Perlman, S. Coronaviruses: An overview of their replication and pathogenesis. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1282, 1–23. [Google Scholar]
  60. Chang, C.-K.; Sue, S.-C.; Yu, T.-H.; Hsieh, C.-M.; Tsai, C.-K.; Chiang, Y.-C.; Lee, S.-J.; Hsiao, H.-H.; Wu, W.-J.; Chang, W.-L.; et al. Modular organization of SARS coronavirus nucleocapsid protein. J. Biomed. Sci. 2005, 13, 59–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Hurst, K.R.; Koetzner, C.A.; Masters, P.S. Identification of In Vivo-Interacting Domains of the Murine Coronavirus Nucleocapsid Protein. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 7221–7234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Cui, L.; Wang, H.; Ji, Y.; Yang, J.; Xu, S.; Huang, X.; Wang, Z.; Qin, L.; Tien, P.; Zhou, X.; et al. The Nucleocapsid Protein of Coronaviruses Acts as a Viral Suppressor of RNA Silencing in Mammalian Cells. J. Virol. 2015, 89, 9029–9043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Tan, Y.J.; Goh, P.Y.; Fielding, B.C.; Shen, S.; Chou, C.F.; Fu, J.L.; Leong, H.N.; Leo, Y.S.; Ooi, E.E.; Ling, A.E.; et al. Profiles of Antibody Responses against Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Recombinant Proteins and Their Potential Use as Diagnostic Markers. Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol. 2004, 11, 362–371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  64. Deng, X.; Stjohn, S.E.; Osswald, H.L.; O'Brien, A.; Banach, B.S.; Sleeman, K.; Ghosh, A.K.; Mesecar, A.D.; Baker, S.C. Coronaviruses Resistant to a 3C-Like Protease Inhibitor Are Attenuated for Replication and Pathogenesis, Revealing a Low Genetic Barrier but High Fitness Cost of Resistance. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 1186–11898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  65. Götte, B.; Liu, L.; McInerney, G.M. The enigmatic alphavirus non-structural protein 3 (nsP3) revealing its secretsat last. Viruses 2018, 10, 105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  66. Kirchdoerfer, R.N.; Ward, A.B. Structure of the SARS-CoV nsp12 polymerase bound to nsp7 and nsp8 co365 factors. Nat. Commun. 2019, 10, 2342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  67. Huang, C.; Lokugamage, K.G.; Rozovics, J.M.; Narayanan, K.; Semler, B.L.; Makino, S. SARS coronavirus nsp1 protein induces template-dependent endonucleolytic cleavage of mRNAs: Viral mRNAs are resistant to nsp1-induced RNA cleavage. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  68. Tanaka, T.; Kamitani, W.; de Diego, M.L.; Enjuanes, L.; Matsuura, Y. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus nsp1 Facilitates Efficient Propagation in Cells through a Specific Translational Shutoff of Host mRNA. J. Virol. 2012, 86, 11128–11137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  69. Graham, R.L.; Sims, A.C.; Brockway, S.M.; Baric, R.S.; Denison, M.R. The nsp2 Replicase Proteins of Murine Hepatitis Virus and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Are Dispensable for Viral Replication. J. Virol. 2005, 79, 13399–13411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  70. Gadlage, M.J.; Graham, R.L.; Denison, M.R. Murine Coronaviruses Encoding nsp2 at Different Genomic Loci Have Altered Replication, Protein Expression, and Localization. J. Virol. 2008, 82, 11964–11969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  71. Lei, J.; Kusov, Y.; Hilgenfeld, R. Nsp3 of coronaviruses: Structures and functions of a large multi-domain protein. Antivir. Res. 2018, 149, 58–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Serrano, P.; Johnson, M.A.; Chatterjee, A.; Neuman, B.W.; Joseph, J.S.; Buchmeier, M.J.; Kuhn, P.; Wüthrich, K. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Structure of the Nucleic Acid-Binding Domain of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Nonstructural Protein 3. J. Virol. 2009, 83, 12998–13008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Beachboard, D.C.; Anderson-Daniels, J.M.; Denison, M.R. Mutations across Murine Hepatitis Virus nsp4 Alter Virus Fitness and Membrane Modifications. J. Virol. 2014, 89, 2080–2089. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Gadlage, M.J.; Sparks, J.S.; Beachboard, D.C.; Cox, R.G.; Doyle, J.D.; Stobart, C.C.; Denison, M.R. Murine Hepatitis Virus Nonstructural Protein 4 Regulates Virus-Induced Membrane Modifications and Replication Complex Function. J. Virol. 2009, 84, 280–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  75. Stobart, C.C.; Sexton, N.R.; Munjal, H.; Lu, X.; Molland, K.L.; Tomar, S.; Mesecar, A.D.; Denison, M.R. Chimeric Exchange of Coronavirus nsp5 Proteases (3CLpro) Identifies Common and Divergent Regulatory Determinants of Protease Activity. J. Virol. 2013, 87, 12611–12618. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Zhu, X.; Fang, L.; Wang, D.; Yang, Y.; Chen, J.; Ye, X.; Foda, M.F.; Xiao, S. Porcine delta coronavirus nsp5 inhibits interferon-beta production through the cleavage of NEMO. Virology 2017, 502, 33–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Zhu, X.; Wang, D.; Zhou, J.; Pan, T.; Chen, J.; Yang, Y.; Lv, M.; Ye, X.; Peng, G.; Fang, L.; et al. Porcine Deltacoronavirus nsp5 Antagonizes Type I Interferon Signaling by Cleaving STAT2. J. Virol. 2017, 91, e00003-17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  78. Angelini, M.M.; Akhlaghpour, M.; Neuman, B.W.; Buchmeier, M.J. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Nonstructural Proteins 3, 4, and 6 Induce Double-Membrane Vesicles. mBio 2013, 4, 00524-13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Cottam, E.M.; Whelband, M.C.; Wileman, T. Coronavirus NSP6 restricts autophagosome expansion. Autophagy 2014, 10, 1426–1441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  80. Zhai, Y.; Sun, F.; Li, X.; Pang, H.; Xu, X.; Bartlam, M.; Rao, Z. Insights into SARS-CoV transcription and replication from the structure of the nsp7–nsp8 hexadecamer. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12, 980–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Velthuis, A.J.T.; Worm, S.H.E.V.D.; Snijder, E.J. The SARS-coronavirus nsp7+nsp8 complex is a unique multimeric RNA polymerase capable of both de novo initiation and primer extension. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011, 40, 1737–1747. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Egloff, M.-P.; Ferron, F.; Campanacci, V.; Longhi, S.; Rancurel, C.; Dutartre, H.; Snijder, E.J.; Gorbalenya, A.E.; Cambillau, C.; Canard, B. The severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus replicative protein nsp9 is a single-stranded RNA-binding subunit unique in the RNA virus world. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2004, 101, 3792–3796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Zeng, Z.; Deng, F.; Shi, K.; Ye, G.; Wang, G.; Fang, L.; Xiao, S.; Fu, Z.; Peng, G. Dimerization of Coronavirus nsp9 with Diverse Modes Enhances Its Nucleic Acid Binding Affinity. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e00692-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  84. Bouvet, M.; Lugari, A.; Posthuma, C.C.; Zevenhoven, J.C.; Bernard, S.; Betzi, S.; Imbert, I.; Canard, B.; Guillemot, J.-C.; Lécine, P.; et al. Coronavirus Nsp10, a Critical Co-factor for Activation of Multiple Replicative Enzymes. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 25783–25796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  85. Chen, Y.; Su, C.; Ke, M.; Jin, X.; Xu, L.; Zhang, Z.; Wu, A.; Sun, Y.; Yang, Z.; Tien, P.; et al. Biochemical and Structural Insights into the Mechanisms of SARS Coronavirus RNA Ribose 2′-O-Methylation by nsp16/nsp10 Protein Complex. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  86. Decroly, E.; Debarnot, C.; Ferron, F.; Bouvet, M.; Coutard, B.; Imbert, I.; Gluais, L.; Papageorgiou, N.; Sharff, A.; Bricogne, G.; et al. Crystal Structure and Functional Analysis of the SARS-Coronavirus RNA Cap 2′-O-Methyltransferase nsp10/nsp16 Complex. PLoS Pathog. 2011, 7, e1002059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  87. Ma, Y.; Wu, L.; Shaw, N.; Gao, Y.; Wang, J.; Sun, Y.; Lou, Z.; Yan, L.; Zhang, R.; Rao, Z. Structural basis and functional analysis of the SARS coronavirus nsp14–nsp10 complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2015, 112, 9436–9441. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  88. Fang, S.G.; Shen, H.; Wang, J.; Tay, F.P.L.; Liu, D.X. Proteolytic processing of polyproteins 1a and 1ab between non-structural proteins 10 and 11/ 12 of coronavirus infectious bronchitis virus is dispensable for viral replication in cultured cells. Virology, 2008; 379, 175–180. [Google Scholar]
  89. Ahn, D.-G.; Choi, J.-K.; Taylor, D.R.; Oh, J.-W. Biochemical characterization of a recombinant SARS coronavirus nsp12 RNA-dependent RNA polymerase capable of copying viral RNA templates. Arch. Virol. 2012, 157, 2095–2104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  90. Velthuis, A.J.W.T.; Arnold, J.J.; Cameron, C.E.; Worm, S.H.E.V.D.; Snijder, E.J. The RNA polymerase activity of SARS-coronavirus nsp12 is primer dependent. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009, 38, 203–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  91. Adedeji, A.O.; Lazarus, H. Biochemical Characterization of Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Helicase. mSphere 2016, 1, e00235-16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  92. Hao, W.; Wojdyla, J.A.; Zhao, R.; Han, R.; Das, R.; Zlatev, I.; Manoharan, M.; Wang, M.; Cui, S. Crystal structure of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus helicase. PLoS Pathog. 2017, 13, e1006474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Jia, Z.; Yan, L.; Ren, Z.; Wu, L.; Wang, J.; Guo, J.; Zheng, L.; Ming, Z.; Zhang, L.; Lou, Z.; et al. Delicate structural coordination of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome coronavirus Nsp13 upon ATP hydrolysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2019, 47, 6538–6550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  94. Bouvet, M.; Imbert, I.; Subissi, L.; Gluais, L.; Canard, B.; Decroly, E. RNA 3’-end mismatch excision by the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus nonstructural protein nsp10/nsp14 exoribonuclease complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2012, 109, 9372–9377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  95. Chen, Y.; Cai, H.; Pan, J.; Xiang, N.; Tien, P.; Ahola, T.; Guo, D. Functional screen reveals SARS coronavirus nonstructural protein nsp14 as a novel cap N7 methyltransferase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 3484–3489. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  96. Minskaia, E.; Hertzig, T.; Gorbalenya, A.E.; Campanacci, V.; Cambillau, C.; Canard, B.; Ziebuhr, J. Discovery of an RNA virus 3’→5’ exoribonuclease that is critically involved in coronavirus RNA synthesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103, 5108–5113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Eckerle, L.D.; Becker, M.M.; Halpin, R.A.; Li, K.; Venter, E.; Lu, X.; Scherbakova, S.; Graham, R.L.; Baric, R.S.; Stockwell, T.B.; et al. Infidelity of SARS-CoV Nsp14-Exonuclease Mutant Virus Replication Is Revealed by Complete Genome Sequencing. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000896. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  98. Bhardwaj, K.; Sun, J.; Holzenburg, A.; Guarino, L.A.; Kao, C.C. RNA Recognition and Cleavage by the SARS Coronavirus Endoribonuclease. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 361, 243–256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Deng, X.; Hackbart, M.; Mettelman, R.C.; O’Brien, A.; Mielech, A.M.; Yi, G.; Kao, C.C.; Baker, S.C. Coronavirus nonstructural protein 15 mediates evasion of dsRNA sensors and limits apoptosis in macrophages. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, E4251–E4260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  100. Zhang, L.; Li, L.; Yan, L.; Ming, Z.; Jia, Z.; Lou, Z.; Rao, Z. Structural and Biochemical Characterization of Endoribonuclease Nsp15 Encoded by Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus. J. Virol. 2018, 92, e00893-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  101. Shi, P.; Su, Y.; Li, R.; Liang, Z.; Dong, S.; Huang, J. PEDV nsp16 negatively regulates innate immunity to promote viral proliferation. Virus Res. 2019, 265, 57–66. [Google Scholar]
  102. Van Boheemen, S.; de Graaf, M.; Lauber, C.; Bestebroer, T.; Raj, V.; Zaki, A.; Osterhaus, A.; Haagmans, B.; Gorbalenya, A.; Snijder, E.; et al. Genomic Characterization of a Newly Discovered Coronavirus Associated with Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome in Humans. mBio 2012, 3, 00473-12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  103. Raj, V.S.; Mou, H.; Smits, S.L.; Dekkers, D.H.W.; Müller, M.A.; Dijkman, R.; Muth, D.; Demmers, J.A.A.; Zaki, A.; Fouchier, R.A.M.; et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 is a functional receptor for the emerging human coronavirus-EMC. Nature 2013, 495, 251–254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  104. Perlman, S.; Netland, J. Coronaviruses post-SARS: Update on replication and pathogenesis. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2009, 7, 439–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  105. Wang, N.; Shi, X.; Jiang, L.; Zhang, S.; Wang, D.; Tong, P.; Guo, D.; Fu, L.; Cui, Y.; Liu, X.; et al. Structure of MERS-CoV spike receptor-binding domain complexed with human receptor DPP4. Cell Res. 2013, 23, 986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Bertram, S.; Glowacka, I.; Müller, M.A.; Lavender, H.; Gnirss, K.; Nehlmeier, I.; Niemeyer, D.; He, Y.; Simmons, G.; Drosten, C.; et al. Cleavage and Activation of the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein by Human Airway Trypsin-Like Protease. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 13363–13372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  107. Glowacka, I.; Bertram, S.; Müller, M.A.; Allen, P.D.; Soilleux, E.J.; Pfefferle, S.; Steffen, I.; Tsegaye, T.S.; He, Y.; Gnirss, K.; et al. Evidence that TMPRSS2 Activates the Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Spike Protein for Membrane Fusion and Reduces Viral Control by the Humoral Immune Response. J. Virol. 2011, 85, 4122–4134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Wu, F.; Zhao, S.; Yu, B.; Chen, Y.M.; Wang, W.; Song, Z.G.; Hu, Y.; Tao, Z.W.; Tian, J.H.; Pei, Y.Y.; et al. A new coronavirus associated with human respiratory disease in China. Nature 2020, 579, 265–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  109. Xu, X.; Chen, P.; Wang, J.; Feng, J.; Zhou, H.; Li, X.; Zhong, W.; Hao, P. Evolution of the novel coronavirus from the ongoing Wuhan outbreak and modeling of its spike protein for risk of human transmission. Sci. China Life Sci. 2020, 63, 457–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  110. Wan, Y.; Shang, J.; Graham, R.; Baric, R.S.; Li, F. Receptor recognition by novel coro-navirus from Wuhan: An analysis based on decade-long structural studies of SARS. J Virol. 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  111. Wang, D.; Hu, B.; Hu, C.; Zhu, F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, J.; Wang, B.; Xiang, H.; Cheng, Z.; Xiong, Y.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of 138 Hospitalized Patients With 2019 Novel Coronavirus—Infected Pneumonia in Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020, 323, 1061–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Chang, D.; Lin, M.; Wei, L.; Xie, L.; Zhu, G.; Cruz, C.S.D.; Sharma, L. Epidemiologic and Clinical Characteristics of Novel Coronavirus Infections Involving 13 Patients Outside Wuhan, China. JAMA 2020, 323, 1092. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Chen, N.; Zhou, M.; Dong, X.; Qu, J.; Gong, F.; Han, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, J.; Liu, Y.; Wei, Y. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 99 cases of 2019 novel coronavirus pneumonia in Wuhan, China: A descriptive study. Lancet 2020, 395, 507–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Liu, W.; Zhang, Q.; Chen, J.; Xiang, R.; Song, H.; Shu, S.; Chen, L.; Liang, L.; Zhou, J.; You, L.; et al. Detection of Covid-19 in Children in Early January 2020 in Wuhan, China. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1370–1371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Shen, K.L.; Yang, Y.H. Diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus infectionin children: A pressing issue. World J. Pediatr. 2020, 16, 219–221. [Google Scholar]
  116. Guan, W.J.; Ni, Z.Y.; Hu, Y.; Liang, W.H.; Ou, C.Q.; He, J.X.; Liu, L.; Shan, H.; Lei, C.L.; Hui, D.S. Clinical characteristics of 2019 novel coronavirus infection in China. medRxiv 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, J.-J.; Dong, X.; Cao, Y.-Y.; Yuan, Y.-D.; Yang, Y.-B.; Yan, Y.-Q.; Akdis, C.A.; Gao, Y.-D. Clinical characteristics of 140 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 in Wuhan, China. Allergy 2020, 75, 1730–1741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  118. Zumla, A.; Hui, D.S.; Perlman, S. Middle East respiratory syndrome. Lancet 2015, 386, 995–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  119. Al-Omari, A.; Rabaan, A.A.; Salih, S.; Al-Tawfiq, J.A.; Memish, Z.A. MERS coronavirus outbreak: Implications for emerging viral infections. Diagn. Microbiol. Infect. Dis. 2019, 93, 265–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  120. Yeung, M.-L.; Yao, Y.; Jia, L.; Chan, J.F.W.; Chan, K.-H.; Cheung, K.-F.; Chen, H.; Poon, V.K.M.; Tsang, A.K.L.; To, K.K.; et al. MERS coronavirus induces apoptosis in kidney and lung by upregulating Smad7 and FGF2. Nat. Microbiol. 2016, 1, 16004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Li, W.; Moore, M.J.; Vasilieva, N.; Sui, J.; Wong, S.K.; Berne, M.A.; Somasundaran, M.; Sullivan, J.L.; Luzuriaga, K.; Greenough, T.C.; et al. Angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 is a functional receptor for the SARS coronavirus. Nature 2003, 426, 450–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Chen, Y.; Guo, Y.; Pan, Y.; Zhao, Z.J. Structure analysis of the receptor binding of 2019-nCoV. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2020, 525, 135–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Walls, A.C.; Park, Y.J.; Tortorici, M.A.; Wall, A.; McGuire, A.T.; Veesler, D. Structure, function, and antigenicity of the SARS-CoV-2 spike glycoprotein. Cell 2020, 180, 281–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Letko, M.; Marzi, A.; Munster, V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat. Microbiol. 2020, 5, 562–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  125. Zou, X.; Chen, K.; Zou, J.; Han, P.; Hao, J.; Han, Z. Single-cell RNA-seq data analysis on the receptor ACE2 expression reveals the potential risk of different human organs vulnerable to 2019-nCoV infection. Front. Med. 2020, 14, 185–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  126. Chan-Yeung, M.; Xu, R.-H. SARS: Epidemiology. Respirology 2003, 8, S9–S14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Li, B.; Yang, J.; Zhao, F.; Zhi, L.; Wang, X.; Liu, L.; Bi, Z.; Zhao, Y. Prevalence and impact of cardiovascular metabolic diseases on COVID-19 in China. Clin. Res. Cardiol. 2020, 109, 531–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Saavedra, J.M. Angiotensin receptor blockers and COVID-19. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 156, 104832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  129. Belouzard, S.; Chu, V.C.; Whittaker, G.R. Activation of the SARS coronavirus spike protein via sequential proteolytic cleavage at two distinct sites. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2009, 106, 5871–5876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  130. Millet, J.K.; Whittaker, G.R. Host cell entry of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus after two-step, furin-mediated activation of the spike protein. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2014, 111, 15214–15219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  131. Ou, X.; Liu, Y.; Lei, X.; Li, P.; Mi, D.; Ren, L.; Guo, L.; Guo, R.; Chen, T.; Hu, J. Characterization of spike glycoprotein of SARS-CoV-2 on virus entry and its immune cross-reactivity with SARS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 1620. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  132. Belouzard, S.; Millet, J.K.; Licitra, B.N.; Whittaker, G.R. Mechanisms of Coronavirus Cell Entry Mediated by the Viral Spike Protein. Viruses 2012, 4, 1011–1033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  133. Hoffmann, M.; Kleine-Weber, H.; Schroeder, S.; Kruger, N.; Herrler, T.; Erichsen, S.; Schiergens, T.S.; Herrler, G.; Wu, N.-H.; Nitsche, A. SARS-CoV-2 cell entry depends on ACE2 and TMPRSS2 and is blocked by a clinically proven protease inhibitor. Cell 2020, 181, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Lu, R.; Zhao, X.; Li, J.; Niu, P.; Yang, B.; Wu, H.; Wang, W.; Song, H.; Huang, B.; Zhu, N.; et al. Genomic characterisation and epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus: Implications for virus origins and receptor binding. Lancet 2020, 395, 565–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  135. Totura, A.L.; Baric, R.S. SARS coronavirus pathogenesis: Host innate immune responses and viral antagonism of interferon. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2012, 2, 264–275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Hamming, I.; Timens, W.; Bulthuis, M.L.; Lely, A.T.; Navis, G.; van Goor, H. Tissue distribution of ACE2 protein, the functional receptor for SARS coronavirus. A firststep in understanding SARS pathogenesis. J. Pathol. 2004, 203, 631–637. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  137. Wong, C.K.; Lam, C.W.K.; Wu, A.K.L.; Ip, W.K.; Lee, N.L.S.; Chan, I.H.S.; Lit, L.C.W.; Hui, D.S.C.; Chan, M.H.M.; Chung, S.S.C. Plasma inflammatory cytokines and chemokines in severe acute respiratory syndrome. Clin. ExpImmunol. 2004, 136, 95–103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  138. Smits, S.L.; de Lang, A.; van den Brand, J.M.; Leijten, L.M.; van Ijcken, W.F.; Eijkemans, M.J.; van Amerongen, G.; Kuiken, T.; Andeweg, A.C.; Osterhaus, A.D. Exacerbated innate host response to SARS-CoV in aged non-human primates. PLoS Pathog. 2010, 6, e1000756. [Google Scholar]
  139. Jin, Y.H.; Cai, L.; Cheng, Z.S.; Cheng, H.; Deng, T.; Fan, Y.P.; Fang, C.; Huang, D.; Huang, L.Q.; Huang, Q. A rapid advice guideline forthe diagnosis and treatment of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) infected pneumonia (standard version). Mil. Med. Res. 2020, 7, 4. [Google Scholar] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  140. Lei, J.; Li, J.; Li, X.; Qi, X. CT Imaging of the 2019 Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Pneumonia. Radiology 2020, 295, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  141. Zhu, N.; Zhang, D.; Wang, W.; Li, X.; Yang, B.; Song, J.; Zhao, X.; Huang, B.; Shi, W.; Lu, R.; et al. A Novel Coronavirus from Patients with Pneumonia in China, 2019. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 727–733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  142. Chung, M.; Bernheim, A.; Mei, X.; Zhang, N.; Huang, M.; Zeng, X.; Cui, J.; Xu, W.; Yang, Y.; Fayad, Z.A. CT imaging features of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Radiology 2020, 295, 200–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  143. Habibzadeh, P.; Stoneman, E.K. The novel coronavirus: A bird’s eye view. Int. J. Occup. Environ. Med. 2020, 11, 65–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  144. WHO (World Health Organization). Global Surveillance for Human Infection with Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV); WHO: New York, NY, USA, 2020. [Google Scholar]
  145. Russell, C.C.; Millar, J.K.; Baillie, J.E. Clinical evidence does not support corticosteroid treatment for 2019-nCoV lung injury. Lancet 2020, 395, 473–475. [Google Scholar]
  146. Wang, M.; Cao, R.; Zhang, L.; Yang, X.; Liu, J.; Xu, M.; Shi, Z.; Hu, Z.; Zhong, W.; Xiao, G. Remdesivir and chloroquine effectively inhibit the recently emerged novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) in vitro. Cell Res. 2020, 30, 269–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  147. Ng, C.S.; Kasumba, D.M.; Fujita, T.; Luo, H. Spatio-temporal characterization of the antiviral activity of the XRN1-DCP1/2 aggregation against cytoplasmic RNA viruses to prevent cell death. Cell Death Differ 2020, 8, 1–20, Correction in 2020, 27, 2363–2382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  148. Wang, B.X.; Fish, E.N. Global virus outbreaks: Interferons as 1st responders. Semin. Immunol. 2019, 43, 101300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Agostini, M.L.; Andres, E.L.; Sims, A.C.; Graham, R.L.; Sheahan, T.P.; Lu, X.; Smith, E.C.; Case, J.B.; Feng, J.Y.; Jordan, R.; et al. Coronavirus Susceptibility to the Antiviral Remdesivir (GS-5734) Is Mediated by the Viral Polymerase and the Proofreading Exoribonuclease. mBio 2018, 9, e00221-18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  150. Paules, C.I.; Marston, H.D.; Fauci, A.S. Coronavirus infections—More than just the common cold. JAMA 2020, 323, 707–708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  151. Holshue, M.L.; de Bolt, C.; Lindquist, S.; Lofy, K.H.; Wiesman, J.; Bruce, H.; Spitters, C.; Ericson, K.; Wilkerson, S.; Tural, A.; et al. First Case of 2019 Novel Coronavirus in the United States. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 929–936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Sheahan, T.P.; Sims, A.C.; Leist, S.R.; Schäfer, A.; Won, J.; Brown, A.J.; Montgomery, S.A.; Hogg, A.; Babusis, D.; Clarke, M.O.; et al. Comparative therapeutic efficacy of remdesivir and combination lopinavir, ritonavir, and interferon beta against MERS-CoV. Nat. Commun. 2020, 11, 222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  153. Richardson, P.; Griffin, I.; Tucker, C.; Smith, D.; Oechsle, O.; Phelan, A.; Rawling, M.; Savory, E.; Stebbing, J. Baricitinib as potential treatment for 2019-nCoV acute respiratory disease. Lancet 2020, 395, e30–e31. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  154. Liu, X.; Wang, X.-J. Potential inhibitors against 2019-nCoV coronavirus M protease from clinically approved medicines. J. Genet. Genom. 2020, 47, 119–121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Lu, H. Drug treatment options for the 2019-new coronavirus (2019-nCoV). Biosci. Trends 2020, 14, 69–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Gordon, C.J.; Tchesnokov, E.P.; Feng, J.Y.; Porter, D.P.; Götte, M. The antiviral compound remdesivir potently inhibits RNA-dependent RNA polymerase from Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Biol. Chem. 2020, 295, 4773–4779. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  157. Chen, S.; Chan, K.; Jiang, Y.; Kao, R.; Lu, H.; Fan, K.; Cheng, V.; Tsui, W.; Hung, I.; Lee, T. In vitro susceptibility of 10 clinical isolates of SARS coronavirus to selected antiviral compounds. J. Clin. Virol. 2004, 31, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Yao, T.; Qian, J.; Zhu, W.; Wang, Y.; Wang, G. A systematic review of lopinavir therapy for SARS coronavirus and MERS coronavirus—A possible reference for coronavirus disease-19 treatment option. J. Med Virol. 2020, 92, 556–563. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  159. Riva, A.; Conti, F.; Bernacchia, D.; Pezzati, L.; Sollima, S.; Merli, S.; Siano, M.; Lupo, A.; Rusconi, S.; Cattaneo, D. Darunavir does not prevent SARS-CoV-2 infection in HIV patients. Pharmacol. Res. 2020, 157, 104826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Furuta, Y.; Gowen, B.B.; Takahashi, K.; Shiraki, K.; Smee, D.F.; Barnard, D.L. Favipiravir (T-705), a novel viral RNA polymerase inhibitor. Antivir. Res. 2013, 100, 446–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  161. Stockman, L.J.; Bellamy, R.; Garner, P. SARS: Systematic Review of Treatment Effects. PLoS Med. 2006, 3, e343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Kadam, R.U.; Wilson, I.A. Structural basis of influenza virus fusion inhibition by the antiviral drug Arbidol. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2017, 114, 206–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  163. Khamitov, R.A.; Loginova, S.; Shchukina, V.N.; Borisevich, S.V.; Maksimov, V.A.; Shuster, A.M. Antiviral activity of arbidoland its derivatives against the pathogen of severe acute respiratory syndromein the cell cultures. Vopr. Virusol. 2008, 53, 9. [Google Scholar]
  164. Al-Bari, M.A.A. Targeting endosomal acidification by chloroquine analogs as a promising strategy for the treatment of emerging viral diseases. Pharmacol. Res. Perspect. 2017, 5, e00293. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Yao, X.; Ye, F.; Zhang, M.; Cui, C.; Huang, B.; Niu, P.; Liu, X.; Zhao, L.; Dong, E.; Song, C.; et al. In Vitro Antiviral Activity and Projection of Optimized Dosing Design of Hydroxychloroquine for the Treatment of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Clin. Infect. Dis. 2020, 71, 732–739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  166. Caly, L.; Druce, J.D.; Catton, M.G.; Jans, D.A.; Wagstaff, K.M. The FDA—Approved Drug Ivermectin inhibits the replication ofSARS-CoV-2 in vitro. J Antivir. 2020, 178, 1047–1087. [Google Scholar]
  167. Rossignol, J.-F. Nitazoxanide, a new drug candidate for the treatment of Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus. J. Infect. Public Heal. 2016, 9, 227–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  168. Zhao, Z.; Zhang, F.; Xu, M.; Huang, K.; Zhong, W.; Cai, W.; Yin, Z.; Huang, S.; Deng, Z.; Wei, M.; et al. Description and clinical treatment of an early outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in Guangzhou, PR China. J. Med. Microbiol. 2003, 52, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Gautret, P.; Lagier, J.C.; Parola, P.; Meddeb, L.; Mailhe, M.; Doudier, B.; Courjon, J.; Giordanengo, V.; Vieira, V.E.; Dupont, H.T.; et al. Hydroxychloroquine and Azithryomycin as a treatment of COVID-results of an openlabel non-randomized clinical trial. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents. 2020, 20, 105949. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Pan, L.; Mu, M.; Yang, P.; Sun, Y.; Wang, R.; Yan, J.; Li, P.; Hu, B.; Wang, J.; Hu, C.; et al. Clinical Characteristics of COVID-19 Patients with Digestive Symptoms in Hubei, China: A Descriptive, Cross-Sectional, Multicenter Study. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2020, 115, 766–773. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Vaduganathan, M.; Vardeny, O.; Michel, T.; McMurray, J.J.V.; Pfeffer, M.A.; Solomon, S.D. Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors in Patients with Covid-19. N. Engl. J. Med. 2020, 382, 1653–1659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Berry, D.J.; Hesketh, K.; Power, C.; Hyppönen, E. Vitamin D status has a linear association with seasonal infections and lung function in British adults. Br. J. Nutr. 2011, 106, 1433–1440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  173. Derbyshire, E.; Delange, J. COVID-19: Is there a role for immunonutrition, particularly in the over 65s? BMJ Nutr. Prev. Heal. 2020, 3, 100–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Kandimalla, R. SARS-CoV-2 pathophysiology and assessment of coronaviruses in CNS diseases with a focus on therapeutic targets. Biochim. Biophys. Acta Mol. Basis Dis. 2020, 1866, 165889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Atyeo, C.; Slein, M.D.; Fischinger, S.; Burke, J.; Schäfer, A.; Leist, S.R.; Kuzmina, N.A.; Mire, C.; Honko, A.; Johnson, R.; et al. Dissecting strategies to tune the therapeutic potential of SARS-CoV-2–specific monoclonal antibody CR3022. JCI Insight 2021, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Choy, K.T.; Wong, A.Y.; Kaewpreedee, P.; Sia, S.F.; Chen, D.; Hui, K.P.Y.; Chu, D.K.W.; Chan, M.C.W.; Cheung, P.P.; Huang, X. Remdesivir, lopinavir, emetine, and homoharringtonine inhibit SARS-CoV-2 replication in vitro. Antivir. Res. 2020, 178, 104786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  177. Mantlo, E.; Bukreyeva, N.; Maruyama, J.; Paessler, S.; Huanga, C. Antiviral activities of type I interferons to SARS-CoV-2 infection. Antivir. Res. 2020, 179, 104811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  178. Tai, W.; Zhang, X.; He, Y.; Jiang, S.; Dua, L. Identification of SARS-CoV RBD-targeting monoclonal antibodies with cross-reactive or neutralizing activity against SARS-CoV-2. Antivir. Res. 2020, 179, 104820. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  179. Jockusch, S.; Tao, C.; Li, X.; Anderson, T.K.; Chien, M.; Kumar, S.; Russo, J.J.; Kirchdoerfer, R.N.; Ju, J. A library of nucleotide analogues terminate RNA synthesis catalyzed by polymerases of coronaviruses that cause SARS and COVID-19. Antivir. Res. 2020, 180, 104857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Sallard, E.; Lescure, F.-X.; Yazdanpanah, Y.; Mentre, F.; Peiffer-Smadja, N. Type 1 interferons as a potential treatment against COVID-19. Antivir. Res. 2020, 178, 104791. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Jeyaraman, M.; Ranjan, R.; Kumar, R.; Arora, A.; Chaudhary, D.; Ajay, S.S.; Jain, R. Cellular Therapy: Shafts of Light Emerging for COVID-19. Stem Cell Investig. 2020, 7, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Yang, Y.; Islam, M.S.; Wang, J.; Li, Y.; Chen, X. Traditional Chinese Medicine in the Treatment of Patients Infected with 2019-New Coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2): A Review and Perspective. Int. J. Biol. Sci. 2020, 16, 1708–1717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  183. Fang, L.; Karakiulakis, G.; Roth, M. Antihypertensive drugs and risk of COVID-19? Authors’ reply. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020, 8, e32–e33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  184. Rahman, N.; Basharat, Z.; Yousuf, M.; Castaldo, G.; Rastrelli, L.; Khan, H. Virtual Screening of Natural Products against Type II Transmembrane Serine Protease (TMPRSS2), the Priming Agent of Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). Molecules 2020, 25, 2271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Oo, A.; Teoh, B.T.; Sam, S.S.; Abu Bakar, S.; Zandi, K. Baicalein and baicalin as Zika virus inhibitors. Arch. Virol. 2019, 164, 585–593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Gurung, A.B.; Ali, M.A.; Lee, J.; Farah, M.A.; Al-Anazi, K.M. Unravelling lead antiviral phytochemicals for the inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 Mpro enzyme through in silico approach. Life Sci. 2020, 255, 117831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  187. Gentile, D.; Patamia, V.; Scala, A.; Sciortino, M.T.; Piperno, A.; Rescina, A. Putative Inhibitors of SARS-CoV-2 Main Protease from A Library of Marine Natural Products: A Virtual Screening and Molecular Modeling Study. Mar. Drugs 2020, 18, 225. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  188. Cui, Q.; Huang, C.; Ji, X.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, F.; Wang, L. Possible Inhibitors of ACE2, the Receptor of 2019-nCoV. Preprints. 2020. Available online: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202002.0047/v1 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  189. Cheng, J.; Tang, Y.; Bao, B.; Zhang, P. Exploring the Active Compounds of Traditional Mongolian Medicine Agsirga in Intervention of Novel Coronavirus (2019-nCoV) Based on HPLC-Q-Exactive-MS/MS and Molecular Docking Method. ChemRxiv. 2020. Available online: https://chemrxiv.org/articles/preprint/Exploring_the_Active_Compounds_of_Traditional_Mongolian_Medicine_Agsirga_in_Intervention_of_Novel_Coronavirus_2019-nCoV_Based_on_HPLC-Q-Exactive-MS_MS_and_Molecular_Docking_Method/11955273/2 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  190. Meneguzzo, F.; Ciriminna, R.; Zabini, F.; Pagliaro, M. Review of Evidence Available on Hesperidin-Rich Products as Potential Tools against COVID-19 and Hydrodynamic Cavitation-Based Extraction as a Method of Increasing Their Production. Processes 2020, 8, 549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  191. Pandit, M.; Latha, N. In silico studies reveal potential antiviral activity of phytochemicals from medicinal plants for the treatment of COVID-19 infection. Res. Sq. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  192. Joshi, R.S.; Jagdale, S.S.; Bansode, S.B.; Shankar, S.S.; Tellis, M.B.; Pandya, V.K.; Chugh, A.; Giri, A.P.; Kulkarni, M.J. Discovery of potential multi-target-directed ligands by targeting host-specific SARS-CoV-2 structurally conserved main protease. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  193. Khaerunnisa, S.; Kurniawan, H.; Awaluddin, R.; Suhartati, S.; Soetjipto, S. Potential Inhibitor of COVID-19 Main Protease (Mpro) From Several Medicinal Plant Compounds by Molecular Docking Study. Preprints. 2020. Available online: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202003.0226/v1 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  194. Da Silva, J.K.R.; Figueiredo, P.L.B.; Byler, K.G.; Setzer, W.N. Essential Oils as Antiviral Agents, Potential of Essential Oils to Treat SARS-CoV-2 Infection: An In-Silico Investigation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 3426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  195. Zhang, D.-H.; Wu, K.-L.; Zhang, X.; Deng, S.-Q.; Peng, B. In silico screening of Chinese herbal medicines with the potential to directly inhibit 2019 novel coronavirus. J. Integr. Med. 2020, 18, 152–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Qamar, M.T.U.; Alqahtani, S.M.; Alamri, M.A.; Chen, L.-L. Structural basis of SARS-CoV-2 3CLpro and anti-COVID-19 drug discovery from medicinal plants. J. Pharm. Anal. 2020, 10, 313–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Olubiyi, O.O.; Olagunju, M.; Keutmann, M.; Strodel, B. High Throughput Virtual Screening to Discover Inhibitors of the Main Protease of the Coronavirus SARS-CoV-2. Preprints. 2020. Available online: https://www.preprints.org/manuscript/202004.0161/v2 (accessed on 14 March 2021).
  198. Chen, C.N.; Lin, C.P.C.; Huang, K.K.; Chen, W.C.; Hsieh, H.P.; Liang, P.H.; Hsu, J.T.A. Inhibition of SARS-CoV 3C-like protease activity by Theaflavin-3,30-digallate (TF3). Evid. Based Complementary Altern. Med. 2005, 2, 209–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. El Fiky, A.A. Natural products may interfere with SARS-CoV-2 attachment to the host cell. J. Biomol. Struct. Dyn. 2020, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Sharma, A.; Tiwari, V.; Sowdhamini, R. Computational search for potential COVID-19 drugs from FDA-approved drugs and small molecules of natural origin identifies several anti-virals and plant products. J. Biosci. 2020, 45, 1–18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Gretebeck, L.M.; Subbarao, K. Animal models for SARS and MERS coronaviruses. Curr. Opin. Virol. 2015, 13, 123–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Cockrell, A.S.; Peck, K.M.; Yount, B.L.; Agnihothram, S.S.; Scobey, T.; Curnes, N.R.; Baric, R.S.; Heise, M.T. Mouse Dipeptidyl Peptidase 4 Is Not a Functional Receptor for Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus Infection. J. Virol. 2014, 88, 5195–5199. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  203. Nagata, N.; Iwata, N.; Hasegawa, H.; Fukushi, S.; Yokoyama, M.; Harashima, A.; Sato, Y.; Saijo, M.; Morikawa, S.; Sata, T. Participation of both Host and Virus Factors in Induction of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS) in F344 Rats Infected with SARS Coronavirus. J. Virol. 2006, 81, 1848–1857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  204. Roychoudhury, S.; Das, A.; Sengupta, P.; Dutta, S.; Roychoudhury, S.; Choudhury, A.P.; Ahmed, A.B.F.; Bhattacharjee, S.; Slama, P. Viral Pandemics of the Last Four Decades: Pathophysiology, Health Impacts and Perspectives. In Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health; 2020; Volume 17, p. 9411. [Google Scholar]
  205. Roychoudhury, S.; Das, A.; Jha, N.K.; Kesari, K.K.; Roychoudhury, S.; Jha, S.K.; Kosgi, R.; Choudhury, A.P.; Lukac, N.; Madhu, N.R.; et al. Viral pathogenesis of SARS-CoV-2 infection and male reproductive health. Open Biol. 2021, 11, 200347. [Google Scholar]
  206. Roychoudhury, S.; Das, A.; Sengupta, P.; Dutta, S.; Roychoudhury, S.; Kolesarova, A.; Hleba, L.; Massanyi, P.; Slama, P. Viral pandemics of twenty-first century. J. Microbiol. Biotech. Food Sci. 2021, 10, 711–716. [Google Scholar]
  207. Jha, N.K.; Ojha, S.; Jha, S.K.; Dureja, H.; Singh, S.K.; Shukla, S.D.; Chellappan, D.K.; Gupta, G.; Bhardwaj, S.; Kumar, N.; et al. Evidence of Coronavirus (CoV) Pathogenesis and Emerging Pathogen SARS-CoV-2 in the Nervous System: A Review on Neurological Impairments and Manifestations. J Mol Neurosci. 2021, 19, 1–18. [Google Scholar]
  208. Javed, H.; Meeran, M.F.N.; Jha, N.K.; Ojha, S. Carvacrol, a Plant Metabolite Targeting Viral Protease (M pro) and ACE2 in Host Cells Can Be a Possible Candidate for COVID-19. Front Plant Sci. 2021, 11, 601335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  209. Jeyaraman, M.; John, A.; Koshy, S.; Ranjan, R.; Anudeep, T.C.; Jain, R.; Swati, K.; Jha, N.K.; Sharma, A.; Kesari, K.K.; et al. Fostering mesenchymal stem cell therapy to halt cytokine storm in COVID-19. Biochim Biophys Acta MolBasis Dis. 2021, 1867, 166014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  210. Nagoor Meeran, M.F.; Javed, H.; Sharma, C.; Goyal, S.N.; Kumar, S.; Jha, N.K.; Ojha, S. Can Echinacea be a potential candidate to target immunity, inflammation, and infection—The trinity of coronavirus disease 2019. Heliyon. 2021, 7, e05990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Epidemiological comparison of respiratory viral infections. (*) denotes the data obtained to date. The given percentage values are not fixed as they might change with time.
Figure 1. Epidemiological comparison of respiratory viral infections. (*) denotes the data obtained to date. The given percentage values are not fixed as they might change with time.
Immuno 01 00004 g001
Figure 2. Structure and life cycle of SARS-CoV-2. The life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 is multistep event such as, binding of SARS-CoV-2-ACE2 receptor, proteolytic cleavage and fusion, release of viral RNA and uncoating of nucleoprotein, process of transcription(forming several mRNA transcripts including S, 3a, 3b, E, M, 3, 7a, 7b, 8, and N), replication and packaging of RNA, process of translation, assembly and procedure of budding, exocytosis, and finally, the release of virus takes place.
Figure 2. Structure and life cycle of SARS-CoV-2. The life cycle of SARS-CoV-2 is multistep event such as, binding of SARS-CoV-2-ACE2 receptor, proteolytic cleavage and fusion, release of viral RNA and uncoating of nucleoprotein, process of transcription(forming several mRNA transcripts including S, 3a, 3b, E, M, 3, 7a, 7b, 8, and N), replication and packaging of RNA, process of translation, assembly and procedure of budding, exocytosis, and finally, the release of virus takes place.
Immuno 01 00004 g002
Figure 3. Molecular pathomechanisms of COVID-19.
Figure 3. Molecular pathomechanisms of COVID-19.
Immuno 01 00004 g003
Figure 4. This schematic describes the proposed mechanistic role of ACE2 on SARS-CoV-2 infection. The SARS-CoV-2 virus uses the ACE2 receptor to gain entry into the cell (airway epithelial cells), leading to an increase in proinflammatory cytokines and the development of cytokine storm, which lead to lung damage and augmented COVID-19 severity. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) might increase the expression of ACE2, and TMPRSS2 assists in S protein priming, leading to enhanced binding of SARS-CoV-2 and higher proinflammatory cytokine release. The higher expression of ACE2 is reported to affect SRC and RPS3, the two crucial genes engaged in inflammatory responses and viral replication. Further, the expression of ACE2, at the same time, is enhanced by the infection. It is also evident that at the same time, SARS-CoV-2 may downregulate ACE2 expression, which further contributes to an increase in angiotensin-2-induced lung injury. The ACE2-mediated negative regulatory activity is curtailed by SARS-CoV-2 and contributes to aggravating the severity of illness.
Figure 4. This schematic describes the proposed mechanistic role of ACE2 on SARS-CoV-2 infection. The SARS-CoV-2 virus uses the ACE2 receptor to gain entry into the cell (airway epithelial cells), leading to an increase in proinflammatory cytokines and the development of cytokine storm, which lead to lung damage and augmented COVID-19 severity. Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) might increase the expression of ACE2, and TMPRSS2 assists in S protein priming, leading to enhanced binding of SARS-CoV-2 and higher proinflammatory cytokine release. The higher expression of ACE2 is reported to affect SRC and RPS3, the two crucial genes engaged in inflammatory responses and viral replication. Further, the expression of ACE2, at the same time, is enhanced by the infection. It is also evident that at the same time, SARS-CoV-2 may downregulate ACE2 expression, which further contributes to an increase in angiotensin-2-induced lung injury. The ACE2-mediated negative regulatory activity is curtailed by SARS-CoV-2 and contributes to aggravating the severity of illness.
Immuno 01 00004 g004
Figure 5. Schematic depiction showing various diagnosis and testing ways of COVID-19.
Figure 5. Schematic depiction showing various diagnosis and testing ways of COVID-19.
Immuno 01 00004 g005
Figure 6. Possible therapeutic strategies to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Figure 6. Possible therapeutic strategies to combat SARS-CoV-2 infection.
Immuno 01 00004 g006
Table 1. List of important pathogenic coronaviruses their host organisms, genera name, and associated clinical manifestations.
Table 1. List of important pathogenic coronaviruses their host organisms, genera name, and associated clinical manifestations.
S.No.NameHost OrganismGenera NameClinical Manifestations
1Feline infectious peritonitis virusCatAlphaVasculitis, fever, serositis, with or without effusions
2Camel alphacoronavirus isolate camel/RiyadhCamelAlphaAsymptomatic
3Canine CoV/TU336/F/2008DogAlphaDiarrhea and mild clinical signs
4SeACoV-CH/GD-01PigAlphaAcute and severe diarrhea and vomiting
5TGEV/PUR46-MADPigAlphaDiarrhea
6PRCV/ISU-1PigAlphaMild respiratory tract infections (RTIs)
7PEDV/ZJU-G1-2013PigAlphaSevere watery diarrhea
8Human CoV-NL63HumanAlphaMild RTIs
9Human CoV-229EHumanAlphaMild RTIs
10MHV-A59MouseBetaSevere lung injuries and acute pneumonia
11Equine CoV/Obihiro12-1HorseBetaLeucopenia, fever, and anorexia
12Bovine CoV/ENTCowBetaDiarrhea
13MERS-CoVHumanBetaSevere acute respiratory syndrome
14SARS-CoVHumanBetaSevere acute respiratory syndrome
15Human CoV-OC43HumanBetaMild RTIs
16Human CoV-HKU1HumanBetaPneumonia
17IBVChickenGammaSevere respiratory disease
18Beluga Whale CoV/SW1WhaleGammaTerminal acute liver failure and pulmonary disease
19Sparrow coronavirus HKU17SparrowDeltaRespiratory disease
20Bulbul coronavirus HKU11BulbulDeltaRespiratory disease
Table 2. Non-structural proteins (nsps) and associated functions.
Table 2. Non-structural proteins (nsps) and associated functions.
S.No.NameAssociated FunctionsReferences
1nsp1Inhibits IFNsignaling and involves in cellular mRNA degradation [67,68]
2nsp2Unclear[69,70]
3nsp3Promotescytokine expression, PLP, polypeptides cleaving and blocks hostinnate immune response[71,72]
4nsp4Involves in double-membrane vesicle (DMV) formation[73,74]
5nsp5Inhibits IFNsignaling, acts as a chymotrypsin-like protease (3CLpro), main protease (Mpro), and cleaves polypeptides[75,76,77]
6nsp6Restricts DMV formation and autophagosome expansion[78,79]
7nsp7Acts as a cofactor with nsp8 and nsp12[64,80]
8nsp8Primase activity and also acts as a cofactor with nsp7 and nsp12[66,80,81]
9nsp9Involves in dimerization and RNA binding[82,83]
10nsp10acts as a scaffold protein for nsp14 and nsp16[84,85,86,87]
11nsp11Unclear[88]
12nsp12Primer dependent RdRp[66,89,90]
13nsp135′ triphosphatase and RNA helicase [91,92,93]
14nsp14N7-Mtase and exoribonuclease [94,95,96,97]
15nsp15Acts as an endoribonuclease and evasion of double-stranded RNA viruses (dsRNA) sensors[98,99,100]
16nsp162′-O-Mtase avoids MDA5 recognition and negatively regulates innate immunity[85,86,101]
Table 3. List of natural products/isolated compounds or their derivatives and drugs that inhibit the coronavirus family.
Table 3. List of natural products/isolated compounds or their derivatives and drugs that inhibit the coronavirus family.
CategoriesCompound NameProposed Mode of ActionsInvolved VirusesReferences
Antiviral drugsRemdesivir (GS-5734, Nucleoside analogue of Remdesivir triphosphate) (RDV-TP)Inhibitor of RdRpSARS-CoV-2[156]
Lopinavir/RitonavirHIV protease inhibitorHIV infection, SARS-CoV-1, and MERS-CoV[157,158]
Darunavir/CobicistatProtease inhibitorSARS-CoV-2[159]
Favipiravir (T-705) Purine nucleotideRNA polymerase inhibitorRNA viruses and SARS-CoV-2[160]
Ribavirin (Guanine analogue)Inhibits viral RdRpSARS-CoV-1 and SARS-CoV-2[161]
Umifenovir (Arbidol)Targeting the S protein/ACE2 and inhibits the membrane fusion of the envelope of the virusInfluenza and SARS-CoV-2[162,163]
Antimalarial drugsChloroquine (Synthetic version of quinine and is found in the bark of cinchona trees)Reduces the rate of replicationMalaria, systemic inflammatory diseases, and SARS-CoV-2[164]
HydroxychloroquineInhibition of glycosylation of host receptors, proteolytic processing, and acidification of endosomesSARS-CoV-2 and autoimmune diseases[165]
Antiparasitic drugsIvermectinInhibits nuclear transportParasitic Infections and SARS-CoV-2[166]
Nitazoxanide (Anti-helminthic drug)UnclearMERS and SARS-CoV-2[167]
Adjunctive drugsCorticosteroids/quinolone (n combination)Prevents ARDSSARS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2[168]
Monoclonal Antibodies (Tocilizumab, Sarilumab, Eculizumab, Fingolimod, Bevacizumab)Immunomodulatory effect, inhibition of terminal complement, and anti–VEGF medicationSARS-CoV-2 and Chronic Inflammatory disorders[169,170]
ACE-Inhibitors and ARBs (enzyme)Activates RAAS mechanismSARS-CoV-2[171]
Interferon-(α and β)UnclearMERS-CoV and SARS-CoV-2[161]
Vitamin-D (Adjunct with vitamin C and zinc)Inhibits inflammatory response and attenuates cytokine stormSARS-CoV-2[172,173]
Table 4. List of approved vaccines for COVID-19; data retrieved from https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-vaccine-tracker, accessed on 14 March 2021.
Table 4. List of approved vaccines for COVID-19; data retrieved from https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-vaccine-tracker, accessed on 14 March 2021.
S.NoNameVaccine TypePrimary DeveloperCountry of OriginList of Countries Approved for Use
1Comirnaty (BNT162b2)mRNA-based vaccinePfizer, BioNTech; Fosun PharmaMultinationalAlbania, Andorra, Argentina, Aruba, Australia, Bahrain, Brazil, Canada, Caribbean, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Ecuador, EU, Faroe Islands, Greenland, Hong Kong, Iceland, Iraq, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kuwait, Liechtenstein, Malaysia, Mexico, Monaco, New Zealand, North Macedonia, Norway, Oman, Panama, Philippines, Qatar, Rwanda, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Saudi Arabia, Serbia, Singapore, South Korea, Suriname, Switzerland, UAE, UK, US, Vatican City, WHO
2Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine (mRNA-1273)mRNA-based vaccineModerna, BARDA, NIAIDUSCanada, EU, Faroe Islands, Greenland, Iceland, Israel, Liechtenstein, Norway, Qatar, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom, United States, Vietnam
3COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca (AZD1222); also known as CovishieldAdenovirus vaccineBARDA, OWSUKAustralia, Argentina, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Barbados, Brazil, Canada, Chile, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador, Egypt, EU, Ghana, Guyana, Hungary, India, Indonesia, Iraq, Ivory Coast, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritius, Mexico, Morocco, Myanmar, Nepal, Nigeria, Pakistan, Philippines, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, South Africa, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, UK, Vietnam
4Sputnik VRecombinant adenovirus vaccine (rAd26 and rAd5)Gamaleya Research Institute, Acellena Contract Drug Research and DevelopmentRussiaAlgeria, Angola, Argentina, Armenia, Bahrain, Belarus, Bolivia, Congo, Djibouti, Egypt, Gabon, Ghana, Guatemala, Guinea, Guyana, Honduras, Hungary, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kazakhstan, Kenya, Kyrgyzstan, Laos, Lebanon, Mexico, Moldova, Mongolia, Montenegro, Morocco, Myanmar, Nicaragua, North Macedonia, Pakistan, Palestine, Paraguay, Republika Srpska, Russia, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, San Marino, Serbia, Slovakia, Sri Lanka, Syria, Tunisia, Turkmenistan, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan, Venezuela, Zimbabwe
5COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen (JNJ-78436735; Ad26.COV2.S)Non-replicating viral vectorJanssen Vaccines (Johnson & Johnson)The Netherlands, USBahrain, Canada, EU, Saint Vincent and the Grenadines, US, WHO
6CoronaVacInactivated vaccine (formalin with alum adjuvant)SinovacChinaAzerbaijan, Bolivia, Brazil, Cambodia, China, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador, Hong Kong, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Mexico, Thailand, Tunisia, Turkey, Philippines, Ukraine, Uruguay, Zimbabwe
7BBIBP-CorVInactivated vaccineBeijing Institute of Biological Products; China National Pharmaceutical Group (Sinopharm)ChinaArgentina, Bahrain, Cambodia, China, Egypt, Hungary, Iraq, Jordan, Laos, Macau, Morocco, Nepal, Pakistan, Peru, Senegal, Serbia, Seychelles, UAE, Venezuela, Zimbabwe
8EpiVacCoronaPeptide vaccineFederal Budgetary Research Institution State Research Center of Virology and BiotechnologyRussiaRussia, Turkmenistan
9Convidicea (Ad5-nCoV)Recombinant vaccine (adenovirus type 5 vector)CanSino BiologicsChinaMexico, China, Pakistan
10CovaxinInactivated vaccineBharat Biotech, ICMRIndiaIndia, Zimbabwe
11No name announcedInactivated vaccineWuhan Institute of Biological Products; China National Pharmaceutical Group (Sinopharm)ChinaChina
12CoviVacInactivated vaccineChumakov Federal Scientific Center for Research and Development of Immune and Biological ProductsRussiaRussia
13ZF2001Recombinant vaccineAnhui ZhifeiLongcom Biopharmaceutical, Institute of Microbiology of the Chinese Academy of SciencesChina, UzbekistanUzbekistan
Table 5. List of vaccine candidates under development along with their clinical trial stages; data retrieved from https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-vaccine-tracker, accessed on 14 March 2021.
Table 5. List of vaccine candidates under development along with their clinical trial stages; data retrieved from https://www.raps.org/news-and-articles/news-articles/2020/3/covid-19-vaccine-tracker, accessed on 14 March 2021.
S.NoCandidate NameVaccine TypeSponsor/DeveloperClinical Trial StageCompanies/Universities
1NVX-CoV2373Nanoparticle vaccineNovavaxPhase 3Novavax
2ZyCoV-DDNA vaccine (plasmid)Zydus CadilaPhase 3Zydus Cadila
3Abdala (CIGB 66)Protein subunit vaccineCenter for Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyPhase 3Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
4CVnCoVmRNA-based vaccineCureVac; GSKPhase 2b/3CureVac
5Bacillus Calmette-Guerin (BCG) vaccineLive-attenuated vaccineUniversity of Melbourne and Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; Radboud University Medical Center; Faustman Lab at Massachusetts General HospitalPhase 2/3University of Melbourne and Murdoch Children’s Research Institute; Radboud University Medical Center; Faustman Lab at Massachusetts General Hospital
6INO-4800DNA vaccine (plasmid)Inovio PharmaceuticalsPhase 2/3Center for Pharmaceutical Research, Kansas City. Mo.; University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia
7VIR-7831Plant-based adjuvant vaccineMedicago; GSK; DynavaxPhase 2/3Medicago
8No name announcedAdenovirus-based vaccineImmunityBio; NantKwestPhase 2/3NA
9UB-612Multitope peptide-based vaccineCOVAXXPhase 2/3United Biomedical Inc. (UBI)
10No name announcedRecombinant protein vaccineSanofi; GlaxoSmithKlinePhase 2Various
11BNT162mRNA-based vaccinePfizer, BioNTechPhase 1/2/3Multiple study sites in Europe, North America and China
12Soberana 1 and 2Monovalent/conjugate vaccineFinlay Institute of VaccinesPhase 1/2/3Finlay Institute of Vaccines
13AdCLD-CoV19Adenovirus-based vaccineCellid; LG ChemPhase 1/2aKorea University Guro Hospital
14NanocovaxRecombinant vaccine (Spike protein)Nanogen BiopharmaceuticalPhase 1/2Military Medical Academy (Vietnam)
15EuCorVac-19nanoparticle vaccineEuBiologicsPhase 1/2Eunpyeong St. Mary’s Hospital
16Mambisa (CIGB 669)Protein subunit vaccineCenter for Genetic Engineering and BiotechnologyPhase 1/2Center for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology
17IIBR-100Recombinant vesicular stomatitis virus (rVSV) vaccineIsrael Institute for Biological ResearchPhase 1/2Hadassah Medical Center; Sheba Medical Center Hospital
18No name announcedSF9 cell vaccine candidateWest China Hospital, Sichuan UniversityPhase 1/2West China Hospital, Sichuan University
19VLA2001Inactivated vaccineValneva; National Institute for Health Research (NIHR)Phase 1/2Multiple NIHR testing sites
20No name announcedAdjuvanted protein subunit vaccineCEPIPhase 1/2NA
21AG0301-COVID19DNA vaccineAnGes, Inc.Phase 1/2AnGes, Inc.; Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
22GX-19NDNA vaccineGenexinePhase 1/2
23ARCT-021 (LUNAR-COV19)Self-replicating RNA vaccineArcturus Therapeutics and Duke-NUS Medical SchoolPhase 1/2Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
24No name announcedInactivated vaccineChinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Institute of Medical BiologyPhase 1/2West China Second University Hospital, Yunnan Center for Disease Control and Prevention
25HDT-301 (HGCO19)RNA vaccineUniversity of Washington; National Institutes of Health Rocky Mountain Laboratories; HDT Bio Corp; Gennova BiopharmaceuticalsPhase 1/2NA
26AV-COVID-19Dendritic cell vaccineAivita Biomedical, Inc.Phase 1b/2Rumah Sakit Umum Pusat DrKariadi
27PTX-COVID19-BmRNA-based vaccineProvidence Therapeutics; Canadian governmentPhase 1NA
28COVI-VACIntranasal vaccineCodagenix; Serum Institute of IndiaPhase 1NA
29CORVax12DNA vaccine (plasmid)OncoSec; Providence Cancer InstitutePhase 1Providence Portland Medical Center
30MVA-SARS-2-SModified vaccinia virus ankara (MVA) vector vaccine candidateUniversitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf; German Center for Infection Research; Philipps University Marburg Medical Center; Ludwig-Maximilians-University of MunichPhase 1University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf
31COH04S1Modified vaccinia virus ankara (MVA) vector vaccine candidateCity of Hope Medical Center; National Cancer InstitutePhase 1City of Hope Medical Center
32pVACMulti-peptide vaccine candidateUniversity Hospital TuebingenPhase 1University Hospital Tuebingen
33AdimrSC-2fProtein subunit vaccineAdimmunePhase 1Adimmune
34bacTRL-SpikeMonovalent oral vaccine (bifidobacteria)SymvivoPhase 1Symvivo Corporation
35COVAX-19Monovalent recombinant protein vaccineVaxine Pty Ltd.Phase 1Royal Adelaide Hospital
36DelNS1-2019-nCoV-RBD-OPT1Replicating viral vectorXiamen University, Beijing Wantai Biological PharmacyPhase 1Jiangsu Provincial Centre For Disease Control and Prevention
37GRAd-COV2Adenovirus-based vaccineReiThera; Leukocare; UnivercellsPhase 1Lazzaro Spallanzani National Institute for Infectious Diseases
38UQ-CSL V451Protein subunit vaccineCSL; The University of QueenslandPhase 1NA
39SCB-2019Protein subunit vaccineGlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi, Clover Biopharmaceuticals, Dynavax and Xiamen Innovax; CEPIPhase 1Linear Clinical Research (Australia)
40VXA-CoV2-1Recombinant vaccine (adenovirus type 5 vector)VaxartPhase 1Vaxart
41AdCOVIDIntranasal vaccineAltimmunePhase 1University of Alabama at Birmingham
42AAVCOVIDGene-based vaccineMassachusetts Eye and Ear; Massachusetts General Hospital; University of PennsylvaniaPre-clinicalNA
43ChAd-SARS-CoV-2-SAdenovirus-based vaccineWashington University School of Medicine in St. LouisPre-clinicalWashington University School of Medicine in St. Louis
44HaloVaxSelf-assembling vaccineVoltron Therapeutics, Inc.; Hoth Therapeutics, Inc.Pre-clinicalMGH Vaccine and Immunotherapy Center
45LineaDNADNA vaccineTakis BiotechPre-clinicalTakis Biotech
46MRT5500mRNA-based vaccineSanofi, Translate BioPre-clinicalNA
47No name announcedIi-Key peptide COVID-19 vaccineGenerex BiotechnologyPre-clinicalGenerex
48No name announcedProtein subunit vaccineUniversity of Saskatchewan Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine CentrePre-clinicalUniversity of Saskatchewan Vaccine and Infectious Disease Organization-International Vaccine Centre
49No name announcedmRNA-based vaccineChulalongkorn University’s Center of Excellence in Vaccine Research and DevelopmentPre-clinicalNA
50No name announcedgp96-based vaccineHeat BiologicsPre-clinicalUniversity of Miami Miller School of Medicine
51No name announcedInactivated vaccineShenzhen Kangtai Biological ProductsPre-clinicalNA
52PittCoVaccRecombinant protein subunit vaccine (delivered through microneedle array)UPMC/University of Pittsburgh School of MedicinePre-clinicalUniversity of Pittsburgh
53T-COVIDTMIntranasal vaccineAltimmunePre-clinicalNA
54LNP-nCoVsaRNASelf-amplifying RNA vaccineImperial College LondonNo longer being studiedImperial College London
55V590Recombinant vaccine (vesicular stomatitis virus)Merck; IAVINo longer being studiedNA
56V591Measles vector vaccineUniversity of Pittsburgh’s Center for Vaccine ResearchNo longer being studiedUniversity of Pittsburgh; Themis Biosciences; Institut Pasteur
Table 6. Recently evaluated natural metabolites against COVID-19 by virtual docking.
Table 6. Recently evaluated natural metabolites against COVID-19 by virtual docking.
Target/Binding SiteNatural Products/MetabolitesBinding Energy (kcal mol−1)Reference
ACE2Zhebeininoside−6.8[189]
Verdine−6.6
Pseudojervine−6.8
Imperialine-3-b-D-glucoside−7.1
Hupehemonside−7.1
Nobiletin−5.42[190]
Neohesperidin−3.78
Hesperetin−6.09
Hesperidin−4.21
Naringenin−6.05
Narigin−6.85
Chloroquine−8.019[191]
Philligenin−7.807
Hinokinin−7.11
Withaferin A−9.631
Quercetin−8.664
Isoaloresin−7.835
Aloin−8.383
Corydine−6.041
Tetrahydrocurcumin−8.009
Silybin−10.572
Isoquercitrin−7.8[192]
Afzelin−7.1
Oriciacridone F−6.7
Remdesivir −7.8
Cassameridin−8.1
(-)-Asperlicin C−9.5
Kaempferol−7.2
Apigenin−7.1
Myricitrin−7.1
Vitetrifolin D−7.3
Lactucopicrin−8.3
Lactucopicrin 15-oxalate−8.3
Taiwanhomoflavone A−7.6
Epicatechin-(4b,8)-epicatechin-(4b,6)-catechin−8.2
Epicatechin-4-epigallocatechin−7.2
Quercetin 3-glucosyl-(1,4)-rhamnoside−6.5
3CLproEpicatechin-gallate−6.27[193]
α-Copaene−20.08[194]
(E)-β-Farnesene−27.56[194]
Gingerol−5.38[193]
Zingerol−5.4
Apigenin-7-glucoside−7.83
Quercetin−8.47
Kaempferol−8.58
Lopinavir−9.41
Nelfinavir−10.74
Sugiol−6.04[195]
N-cis-feruloyltyramine−6.25
Cryptotanshinone−6.23
Betulinic acid−4.23
Amaranthin−18.14[196]
Methyl rosmarinate−20.62
5,7,3',4'-tetrahydroxy-2'-(3,3-dimethylallyl) isoflavone−29.57
Mirycitrin22.13
Zeylanone−9.12[197]
Glabrolide−9.16
Amentoflavone−9.28
Isoquercitrin−8.2[192]
Afzelin−8.8
Oriciacridone F−9.1
Remdesivir−8.2
Cassameridin−9.3
Kaempferol−7.8
(-)-Asperlicin C−9.7
Apigenin−7.8
Myricitrin−8.9
Vitetrifolin D−7.6
Lactucopicrin 15-oxalate−8.2
Lactucopicrin−7.8
Quercetin 3-glucosyl-(1,4)-rhamnoside−9.9
Epicatechin-(4',8)-epigallocatechin−10
Epicatechin-(4b,8)-epicatechin-(4b,6)-catechin-10.6
Taiwanhomoflavone A−9.6
TMPRSS2Isogemichalcone B−13.07[184]
Microcarpin−13.31
Durumolide K−13.92
Dictyosphaeric acid A−14.02
Geniposide−14.69
Baicalin−8.46[198]
Silybin−11.928[190]
Tetrahydrocurcumin−8.793
Corydine−7.91
Aloin−9.18
HSPA5Caffeic acid−6.2[199]
Chlorogenic acid−6.5
Palmitic acid−5.5
Biochanin A−6.9
Formotein−7.5
Genistein−7.5
Diadiazin−8.6
NSP1Shogaol−2.64[200]
Gingerenone−4.39
Remdesivir−5.8
Lactose−11.66
Esculin−6.88
(-)-Epicatechin 3-O-(3'-O-methyl) gallate−13.1[184]
Curtisian L−13.38
5-Methoxyhydnocarpin−13.92
Citicoline−13.96
Isoaloresin−9.759[190]
Withaferin A−11.242
Hinokinin−7.67
Philligenin−9.503
Excavatolide M−14.38[184]
Schisphenin A−14.27
Red color: a repurposed drug used as control.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jha, N.K.; Jeyaraman, M.; Rachamalla, M.; Ojha, S.; Dua, K.; Chellappan, D.K.; Muthu, S.; Sharma, A.; Jha, S.K.; Jain, R.; et al. Current Understanding of Novel Coronavirus: Molecular Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment Approaches. Immuno 2021, 1, 30-66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/immuno1010004

AMA Style

Jha NK, Jeyaraman M, Rachamalla M, Ojha S, Dua K, Chellappan DK, Muthu S, Sharma A, Jha SK, Jain R, et al. Current Understanding of Novel Coronavirus: Molecular Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment Approaches. Immuno. 2021; 1(1):30-66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/immuno1010004

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jha, Niraj Kumar, Madhan Jeyaraman, Mahesh Rachamalla, Shreesh Ojha, Kamal Dua, Dinesh Kumar Chellappan, Sathish Muthu, Ankur Sharma, Saurabh Kumar Jha, Rashmi Jain, and et al. 2021. "Current Understanding of Novel Coronavirus: Molecular Pathogenesis, Diagnosis, and Treatment Approaches" Immuno 1, no. 1: 30-66. https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/immuno1010004

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop