Next Article in Journal
Taking a Step Back? Expatriation Consequences on Women in Dual-Career Couples in the Gulf
Previous Article in Journal
What Does HR Manage? Workforce Measurement and Control
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

The Individual and the Organizational Model of Quantum Decision-Making and Learning: An Introduction and the Application of the Quadruple Loop Learning

by Meir Russ
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Submission received: 27 April 2021 / Revised: 28 May 2021 / Accepted: 9 June 2021 / Published: 15 June 2021

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

  1. The paper has many grammatical errors. Also, the writing and structure of the paper are not well.
  2. The abstract is not well written. The background introduction is long and the novelty of this work was not well justified.
  3. The literature review is weak. It is hard to get the research challenge and motivation of this study.
  4. The authors did not present the usefulness of their proposed method clearly.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

I believe that this paper is on an important topic and is generally very well written.  The one suggestion that I do have is that I think that it might be useful for the authors to add additional specific suggestions for future research in this important area.  

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

42-45 - support with reference within the context of your paper

51- Explain from BD context ( the Vs), how it can improve the decision. 

159-167 
Since big data have an impact on AI/ML, more discussion from this context and dimension is required. I don't see reader will understand if insufficient information in this paper.

Figure 2 and 3: Improve the quality of images. 

Section Conclusion: the element of big data/AI/ML not thoroughly been discussed. Lack of information was given on how future research can be conducted on this part (data/AI/ML)

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

The current version has been significantly improved by the authors. My recommendation is the acceptance of this paper for publication in MERITS.

Reviewer 3 Report

Improve the quality of images

Back to TopTop