Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses

A special issue of International Journal of Neonatal Screening (ISSN 2409-515X).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 August 2020) | Viewed by 24259

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Division of Inborn Errors of Metabolism, North East Italy Newborn Screening Center, University-Hospital of Padova, Padova, Italy
Interests: clinical and biochemical characterisation of inborn errors of intermediary metabolism; clinical application of tandem mass spectrometry; neurotransmitters defects; metabolic diseases in adulthood; development of new therapies; NBS new programs for inborn errors of metabolism

E-Mail
Guest Editor
1. Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
2. Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60611, USA
Interests: lysosomal storage diseases; mucopolysaccharidoses; newborn screening

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The suspicion of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS) might arise from clinical observation of typical signs and symptoms, followed by laboratory confirmation with specific enzyme assays, evaluation of urinary GAGs and molecular genetics analyses. Nowadays, diagnosis of a metabolic disorder may also come from neonatal screening approach. Among MPS disorders, MPS I is the most suitable to be included in neonatal screening programs because the advantage of an early diagnosis allowing early treatment is quite evident. Regular programs and pilot studies on MPS I screening are ongoing now in many countries worldwide. Other treatable MPS (MPS II, IVA, VI, and VII) are also being considered, with neonatal screening already in place or planned for some of them. Public health decisions to include MPS in the neonatal screening should also take into consideration the ethical aspects, as it involves apparently healthy babies and must know how to face, for example, findings such as pseudodeficiency or genetic variants of uncertain significance. As a consequence, physicians should learn how to modulate communication of the screening results to parents, and laboratories should perform and give prompt results of second-tier tests; psychological support services for the families are also needed. As with other groups of diseases, newborn screening for MPS raises the risk of overtreatment and, since all MPS are very rare diseases, evidence of its efficacy is difficult to demonstrate using standard analyses. 

This Special Issue on Newborn Screening for MPS diseases, to be published in the International Journal of Neonatal Screening, will focus on newborn screening experiences and short- and long-term follow-up of newborns identified with different types of MPS. We think this Special Issue comes at a very appropriate moment, and we thank all contributing authors in advance.

Prof. Dr. Alberto Burlina
Prof. Dr. Barbara K. Burton
Prof. Dr. Roberto Giugliani
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Neonatal Screening is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • neonatal screening
  • Mucopolysaccharidosis type I,II,IVA,VI,VII
  • second-tier test

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review, Other

12 pages, 2620 KiB  
Article
A Biochemical Platform to Define the Relative Specific Activity of IDUA Variants Identified by Newborn Screening
by Seok-Ho Yu, Laura Pollard, Tim Wood, Heather Flanagan-Steet and Richard Steet
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6(4), 88; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijns6040088 - 12 Nov 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2553
Abstract
The lysosomal storage disorder, mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPSI), results from mutations in IDUA, the gene that encodes the glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzyme α-L-iduronidase. Newborn screening efforts for MPSI have greatly increased the number of novel IDUA variants identified, but with insufficient experimental evidence regarding their [...] Read more.
The lysosomal storage disorder, mucopolysaccharidosis I (MPSI), results from mutations in IDUA, the gene that encodes the glycosaminoglycan-degrading enzyme α-L-iduronidase. Newborn screening efforts for MPSI have greatly increased the number of novel IDUA variants identified, but with insufficient experimental evidence regarding their pathogenicity, many of these variants remain classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Defining pathogenicity for novel IDUA variants is critical for decisions regarding medical management and early intervention. Here, we describe a biochemical platform for the characterization of IDUA variants that relies on viral delivery of IDUA DNA into IDUA-deficient HAP1 cells and isolation of single cell expression clones. The relative specific activity of wild-type and variant α-iduronidase was determined using a combination of Western blot analysis and α-iduronidase activity assays. The specific activity of each variant enzyme was consistent across different single cell clones despite variable IDUA expression and could be accurately determined down to 0.05–0.01% of WT α-iduronidase activity. With this strategy we compared the specific activities of known pseudodeficiency variants (p.His82Gln, p.Ala79Thr, p.Val322Glu, p.Asp223Asn) or pathogenic variants (p.Ser633Leu, p.His240Arg) with variants of uncertain significance (p.Ser586Phe, p.Ile272Leu). The p.Ser633Leu and p.His240Arg variants both show very low activities consistent with their association with Scheie syndrome. In our experiments, however, p.His240Arg exhibited a specific activity five times higher than p.Ser633Leu in contrast to other reports showing equivalent activity. Cell clones expressing the p.Ser586Phe and p.Ile272Leu variants had specific activities in the range of other pseudodeficiency variants tested. Our findings show that pseudodeficiency and pathogenic variants can be distinguished from each other with regard to specific activity, and confirms that all the pseudodeficiency variants variably reduce α-iduronidase activity. We envision this platform will be a valuable resource for the rigorous assessment of the novel IDUA variants emerging from the expansion of newborn screening efforts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 481 KiB  
Article
Report of Five Years of Experience in Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type I and Review of the Literature
by Vincenza Gragnaniello, Daniela Gueraldi, Laura Rubert, Francesca Manzoni, Chiara Cazzorla, Antonella Giuliani, Giulia Polo, Leonardo Salviati and Alberto Burlina
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6(4), 85; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijns6040085 - 02 Nov 2020
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3379
Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a progressive lysosomal storage disease, with neurological and visceral involvement, in which early diagnosis through newborn screening (NBS) and early treatment can improve outcomes. We present our first 5 years of experience with laboratory and clinical management [...] Read more.
Mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I) is a progressive lysosomal storage disease, with neurological and visceral involvement, in which early diagnosis through newborn screening (NBS) and early treatment can improve outcomes. We present our first 5 years of experience with laboratory and clinical management of NBS for MPS I. Since 2015, we have screened 160,011 newborns by measuring α-L-iduronidase (IDUA) activity and, since 2019, glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in dried blood spot (DBS) as a second-tier test. Positive screening patients were referred to our clinic for confirmatory clinical and molecular testing. We found two patients affected by MPS I (incidence of 1:80,005). Before the introduction of second-tier testing, we found a high rate of false-positives due to pseudodeficiency. With GAG analysis in DBS as a second-tier test, no false-positive newborns were referred to our clinic. The confirmed patients were early treated with enzyme replacement therapy and bone-marrow transplantation. For both, the clinical outcome of the disease is in the normal range. Our experience confirms that NBS for MPS I is feasible and effective, along with the need to include GAG assay as a second-tier test. Follow-up of the two positive cases identified confirms the importance of early diagnosis through NBS and early treatment to improve the outcome of these patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 1233 KiB  
Article
Validation and Implementation of a Highly Sensitive and Efficient Newborn Screening Assay for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II
by Heather Bilyeu, Jon Washburn, Lacey Vermette and Tracy Klug
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6(4), 79; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijns6040079 - 14 Oct 2020
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3358
Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II (MPS II), also known as Hunter syndrome, is a lysosomal storage disorder (LSD) caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS). MPS II satisfies all criteria defined by the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children [...] Read more.
Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II (MPS II), also known as Hunter syndrome, is a lysosomal storage disorder (LSD) caused by a deficiency of the lysosomal enzyme iduronate-2-sulfatase (IDS). MPS II satisfies all criteria defined by the Advisory Committee on Heritable Disorders in Newborns and Children (ACHDNC) for inclusion in the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) for newborn screening, apart from the fact that only minimal prospective population screening data are available. This report details the analytical validation, clinical validation, and implementation of a fluorometric assay for measurement of IDS activity in newborn dried blood spot (DBS) specimens at the Missouri State Public Health Laboratory (MSPHL). The assay is performed in a microwell plate format requiring approximately 15 min of hands-on time per plate and an incubation time of two hours. The analytical validation of this assay included linearity, analytical sensitivity, precision, and carry-over testing. Clinical validation was completed using more than 5000 deidentified presumptive normal newborn DBS specimens as well as seven specimens from patients known to be affected with MPS II. Following validation, MSPHL began prospective screening using the IDS assay on 1 November 2018. In the first 18 months of screening (to 30 June 2020), 146,954 specimens were prospectively screened using the method. Two newborns were identified with severe Hunter syndrome and the assay had a presumptive positive rate of 0.022%. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

6 pages, 202 KiB  
Article
Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis Type II in Illinois: An Update
by Barbara K. Burton, Rachel Hickey and Lauren Hitchins
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6(3), 73; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijns6030073 - 03 Sep 2020
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 2529
Abstract
Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome) is a rare, progressive multisystemic lysosomal storage disorder with significant morbidity and premature mortality. Infants with MPS II develop signs and symptoms of the disorder in the early years of life, yet diagnostic delays are very [...] Read more.
Mucopolysaccharidosis type II (MPS II, Hunter syndrome) is a rare, progressive multisystemic lysosomal storage disorder with significant morbidity and premature mortality. Infants with MPS II develop signs and symptoms of the disorder in the early years of life, yet diagnostic delays are very common. Enzyme replacement therapy is an effective treatment option. It has been shown to prolong survival and improve or stabilize many somatic manifestations of the disorder. Our initial experience with newborn screening in 162,000 infants was previously reported. Here, we update that experience with the findings in 339,269 infants. Measurement of iduronate-2-sulfatase (I2S) activity was performed on dried blood spot samples submitted for other newborn screening disorders. A positive screen was defined as I2S activity less than or equal to 10% of the daily median. In this series, 28 infants had a positive screening test result, and four other infants had a borderline result. Three positive diagnoses of MPS II were established, and 25 were diagnosed as having I2S pseudodeficiency. The natural history and the clinical features of MPS II make it an ideal target for newborn screening. Newborn screening was effective in identifying affected infants in our population with an acceptable rate of false positive results. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses)
0 pages, 3859 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Multiple Methods for Quantification of Glycosaminoglycan Biomarkers in Newborn Dried Blood Spots from Patients with Severe and Attenuated Mucopolysaccharidosis-I
by Zackary M. Herbst, Leslie Urdaneta, Terri Klein, Maria Fuller and Michael H. Gelb
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6(3), 69; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijns6030069 - 26 Aug 2020
Cited by 27 | Viewed by 4056
Abstract
All newborn screening (NBS) for mucopolysaccharidosis-I (MPS-I) is carried out by the measurement of α-iduronidase (IDUA) enzymatic activity in dried blood spots (DBS). The majority of low enzyme results are due to pseudodeficiencies, and studies from the Mayo Clinic have shown that the [...] Read more.
All newborn screening (NBS) for mucopolysaccharidosis-I (MPS-I) is carried out by the measurement of α-iduronidase (IDUA) enzymatic activity in dried blood spots (DBS). The majority of low enzyme results are due to pseudodeficiencies, and studies from the Mayo Clinic have shown that the false positive rate can be greatly reduced by including a second-tier analysis of glycosaminoglycans (GAGs) in DBS as part of NBS. In the present study, we obtained newborn DBS from 13 patients with severe MPS-I and 2 with attenuated phenotypes. These samples were submitted to four different GAG mass spectrometry analyses in a comparative study: (1) internal disaccharide; (2) endogenous disaccharide; (3) Sensi-Pro; (4) Sensi-Pro Lite (a variation of Sensi-Pro with a simplified workflow). Patients with attenuated MPS-I show less GAG elevation than those with severe disease, and all MPS-I patients were separated from the reference range using all four methods. The minimal differential factor (lowest GAG marker level in MPS-I samples divided by highest level in the reference range of 30 random newborns) was about two for internal disaccharide, Sensi-Pro, and Sensi-Pro Lite methods. The endogenous disaccharide was clearly the best method with a minimal differential of 16-fold. This study supports use of second-tier GAG analysis of newborn DBS, especially the endogenous disaccharide method, as part of NBS to reduce the false positive rate. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research, Other

9 pages, 1563 KiB  
Review
Neonatal Screening for MPS Disorders in Latin America: A Survey of Pilot Initiatives
by Francyne Kubaski, Inês Sousa, Tatiana Amorim, Danilo Pereira, Joe Trometer, Alexandre Souza, Enzo Ranieri, Giulia Polo, Alberto Burlina, Ana Carolina Brusius-Facchin, Alice Brinckmann Oliveira Netto, Shunji Tomatsu and Roberto Giugliani
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6(4), 90; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijns6040090 - 13 Nov 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2642
Abstract
Newborn screening enables the diagnosis of treatable disorders at the early stages, and because of its countless benefits, conditions have been continuously added to screening panels, allowing early intervention, aiming for the prevention of irreversible manifestations and even premature death. Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are [...] Read more.
Newborn screening enables the diagnosis of treatable disorders at the early stages, and because of its countless benefits, conditions have been continuously added to screening panels, allowing early intervention, aiming for the prevention of irreversible manifestations and even premature death. Mucopolysaccharidoses (MPS) are lysosomal storage disorders than can benefit from an early diagnosis, and thus are being recommended for newborn screening. They are multisystemic progressive disorders, with treatment options already available for several MPS types. MPS I was the first MPS disorder enrolled in the newborn screening (NBS) panel in the USA and a few other countries, and other MPS types are expected to be added. Very few studies about NBS for MPS in Latin America have been published so far. In this review, we report the results of pilot studies performed in Mexico and Brazil using different methodologies: tandem mass spectrometry, molecular analysis, digital microfluidics, and fluorimetry. These experiences are important to report and discuss, as we expect to have several MPS types added to NBS panels shortly. This addition will enable timely diagnosis of MPS, avoiding the long diagnostic odyssey that is part of the current natural history of this group of diseases, and leading to a better outcome for the affected patients. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 222 KiB  
Review
Digital Microfluidics in Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses: A Progress Report
by Jon Washburn and David S. Millington
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6(4), 78; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijns6040078 - 08 Oct 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2695
Abstract
Newborn screening (NBS) for mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I, Hurler syndrome) is currently conducted in about two-fifths of the NBS programs in the United States and in a few other countries. Screening is performed by measurement of residual activity of the enzyme alpha [...] Read more.
Newborn screening (NBS) for mucopolysaccharidosis type I (MPS I, Hurler syndrome) is currently conducted in about two-fifths of the NBS programs in the United States and in a few other countries. Screening is performed by measurement of residual activity of the enzyme alpha-l-iduronidase in dried blood spots using either tandem mass spectrometry or digital microfluidic fluorometry (DMF). In this article, we focus on the development and practical experience of using DMF to screen for MPS I in the USA. By means of their responses to a questionnaire, we determined for each responding program that is screening for MPS I using DMF the screen positive rate, follow-up methods, and classification of confirmed cases as either severe or attenuated. Overall, the results show that at the time of reporting, over 1.3 million newborns in the US were screened for MPS I using DMF, 2094 (0.173%) of whom were screen positive. Of these, severe MPS I was confirmed in five cases, attenuated MPS I was confirmed in two cases, and undetermined phenotype was reported in one case. We conclude that DMF is an effective and economical method to screen for MPS I and recommend second-tier testing owing to high screen positive rates. Preliminary results of NBS for MPS II and MPS III using DMF are discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses)

Other

Jump to: Research, Review

5 pages, 198 KiB  
Commentary
Newborn Screening for Mucopolysaccharidosis I: Moving Forward Learning from Experience
by Lorne A. Clarke, Patricia Dickson, N. Matthew Ellinwood and Terri L. Klein
Int. J. Neonatal Screen. 2020, 6(4), 91; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijns6040091 - 19 Nov 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2374
Abstract
There have been significant advances allowing for the integration of mucopolysaccharidosis I into newborn screening programs. Initial experiences using a single-tier approach for this disorder have highlighted shortcomings that require immediate remediation. The recent evaluation of a second-tier biomarker integrated into the MPS [...] Read more.
There have been significant advances allowing for the integration of mucopolysaccharidosis I into newborn screening programs. Initial experiences using a single-tier approach for this disorder have highlighted shortcomings that require immediate remediation. The recent evaluation of a second-tier biomarker integrated into the MPS I newborn screening protocol has been demonstrated to greatly improve the precision and predictive value of newborn screening for this disorder. This commentary urges newborn screening programs to learn from these experiences and improve newborn screening for mucopolysaccharidosis I and future mucopolysaccharidoses newborn screening programs by implementation of a second-tier biomarker analyte. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Neonatal Screening for Mucopolysaccharidoses)
Back to TopTop