Servant Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness

A special issue of Administrative Sciences (ISSN 2076-3387). This special issue belongs to the section "Leadership".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2019) | Viewed by 5032

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Center for Transformational Leadership, Bethel University, St. Paul, MN 55407, USA
Interests: servant leadership; team effectiveness; leader purposefulness; leader resiliency; leadership ethics; leadership across cultures

E-Mail
Guest Editor
Division of Business, Pfeiffer University, Misenheimer, NC 28109, USA
Interests: leadership formation; leadership development; servant leadership; cross-cultural team building; cross-cultural team effectiveness

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Servant leadership continues to gain appreciation among leadership practitioners and researchers. Theorists, researchers, and practitioners identify the commitment of leaders focusing on and serving followers as a distinguishing feature of servant leadership practice. This core practice, along with other related servant leadership practices, is viewed not only as a helpful idea, but also as a practice that works and produces positive results in organizations. The early days of theory formation have transitioned to an increasing number of research-based studies examining the nature of servant leadership practice and its effect on followers and today’s organizations.

For this Special Issue focused on “Servant Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness”, we desire to see this line of inquiry and exploration expanded. We invite submissions that engage servant leadership in the context of diverse organizations and diverse organizational sectors. Diversity in disciplinary and methodological approaches is invited as well. We invite submissions that are purely conceptual, as well as submissions with findings grounded in either quantitative or qualitative data.

Prof. Dr. Justin Irving
Dr. Christopher S. Howard
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All papers will be peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authorspage. Administrative Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • servant leadership, organizational effectiveness, job satisfaction, organizational culture job performance, leadership outcomes

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

29 pages, 1097 KiB  
Article
Authentic Talent Development in Women Leaders Who Opted Out: Discovering Authenticity, Balance, and Challenge through the Kaleidoscope Career Model
by Jennifer Knowles and Lisa Mainiero
Adm. Sci. 2021, 11(2), 60; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/admsci11020060 - 17 Jun 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 4712
Abstract
We investigated the parameters of authenticity, balance, and challenge as viewed through the lens of the Kaleidoscope Career Model to discern the career motives of women who opted out and then returned to the workforce. We also were interested in comparing women and [...] Read more.
We investigated the parameters of authenticity, balance, and challenge as viewed through the lens of the Kaleidoscope Career Model to discern the career motives of women who opted out and then returned to the workforce. We also were interested in comparing women and men in their leader practices. We triangulated quantitative and qualitative methods to explore these phenomena. First, in Study 1, 2009 individuals completed both the Kaleidoscope Career Self Inventory (the KCSI) as well as an abbreviated version of Kouzes and Posner’s Leadership Practices Inventory (the LPI). Participants rated their needs for authenticity, balance, and challenge on the KCSI as well as their leader practices of challenging the process, inspiring a shared vision, modeling the way, enabling others to act, and Encouraging the Heart. Women were found to exceed the leader practices of men, and women were most interested in authenticity. In Study 2, situational mapping and life history process was used to determine themes of eight high-achieving women who opted out. We interviewed an additional 15 women to deeply understand and assess their opt-out and re-entry experiences as well as “career shocks” they experienced upon returning to the workforce. Our second study offers a robust, deep, penetrating look into social ascription processes and endemic discriminatory social structures that hold women back from achieving advancement. To stop this “brain drain” of talent, we propose a series of actions for human resource professionals to develop the authentic leadership talent of women who reenter the workforce. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Servant Leadership and Organizational Effectiveness)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop