Remote Sensing Applications for Pest Detection in Agriculture

A special issue of AgriEngineering (ISSN 2624-7402).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 March 2022) | Viewed by 3098

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
The Plant Accelerator, Australian Plant Phenomics Facility, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, Building WT 40, Hartley Grove, Adelaide, SA 5064, Australia
Interests: machine vision and machine learning for plant phenotyping and precision agriculture; plant nutrient estimation; plant disease detection; drought and salt stress tolerance; plant growing status estimation; invertebrate pest detection
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Pests, including weeds and invertebrate pests, are the major source of crop yield loss worldwide. Weeds compete with crops for nutrients and water. Invertebrate pests, such as locusts, aphids and snails, consume corps and spread disease. Effective control of pest is critical for maximising crop yields and meeting quality standards at harvest. However, currently, the agricultural industry is highly reliant on “broad-spectrum” pesticides to control pests. As a result, the overuse of pesticides has resulted in pests developing resistance to pesticides. It also pollutes our environment and threatens food safety. In precision agriculture,  if the location, time, species and populations of pests in the fields were available, instead of heavily relying upon pesticide, site specific weed management (SSWM) or integrated pest management (IPM) would use the optimized combination of mechanical, chemical, biological and genetic tools to control pests. Therefore, pest detection is a prerequisite of SSWM and IPM.

This Special Issue aims to provide researchers with a platform to share the state-of-art remote sensing applications for pest detection in agriculture. With this special issue, we invite you to share your high-quality research results and put new insights into pest detection technologies. Original research papers or review papers are welcome. Contributions are expected to deal with, but are not limited to the following areas:

  • Sensors and Instrumentation
  • Hyperspectral or multispectral sensing
  • Machine vision or computer vision
  • Robotics
  • Automation
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Satellite imaging
  • Unmanned aerial vehicle applications
  • Ground-base platform
  • Greenhouse applications 

Dr. Huajian Liu
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. AgriEngineering is an international peer-reviewed open access quarterly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • invertebrate pest detection
  • weed detection
  • remoting sensing
  • site specific weed management
  • integrated pest management
  • precision agriculture

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

10 pages, 3210 KiB  
Article
Comparison of Navel Orangeworm Adults Detected with Optical Sensors and Captured with Conventional Sticky Traps
by Charles S. Burks
AgriEngineering 2022, 4(2), 523-532; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/agriengineering4020035 - 14 Jun 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1979
Abstract
Attractants used with sticky traps for monitoring navel orangeworm include artificial pheromone lures, ovipositional bait (ovibait) bags, and phenyl propionate; however, the sticky traps have the limitations of potentially becoming ineffective because of full or dirty glue surfaces and of having access to [...] Read more.
Attractants used with sticky traps for monitoring navel orangeworm include artificial pheromone lures, ovipositional bait (ovibait) bags, and phenyl propionate; however, the sticky traps have the limitations of potentially becoming ineffective because of full or dirty glue surfaces and of having access to data dependent on increasingly expensive labor. A study comparing detection with a commercially available pseudo-acoustic optical sensor (hereafter, sensor) connected to a server through a cellular gateway found similar naval orangeworm activity profiles between the sensor and pheromone traps, and the timestamps of events in the sensors was consistent with the behavior of navel orangeworm males orienting to pheromone. Sensors used with ovibait detected navel orangeworm activity when no navel orangeworm were captured in sticky traps with ovibait, and the timestamps for this activity were inconsistent with oviposition times for navel orangeworm in previous studies. When phenyl propionate was the attractant, sensors and sticky traps were more highly correlated than for pheromone traps on a micro-level (individual replicates and monitoring intervals), but there was high variation and week-to-week profiles differed. These results indicate that these sensors represent a promising alternative to sticky traps for use with pheromone as an attractant, but more research is needed to develop the use of sensors with other attractants. These results will guide developers and industry in transfer of this promising technology. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing Applications for Pest Detection in Agriculture)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop