Nitric Oxide and Endothelial Dysfunction: Is eNOS an Innocent Bystander or a Culprit?

A special issue of Antioxidants (ISSN 2076-3921). This special issue belongs to the section "Antioxidant Enzyme Systems".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2022) | Viewed by 2177

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology−Pharmacology Section, Medical School–University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, Bari, Italy
Interests: endothelial dysfunction; endothelial mediators; insulin signaling; oxidative stress; metabolic syndrome; adipocytokines
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Almost 30 years after being proclaimed “molecule of the year” in 1992, the fascinating nature of nitric oxide (NO) continues to fuel research in the fields of physiology, immunology, neuroscience, and cardiology. NO is a diatomic, amphipathic, free-radical gaseous mediator with very short half-life whose availability depends on the timed activation of dedicated enzymes (NO synthases). In vessels, the impaired production of NO by the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS) isoform leads to endothelial dysfunction—a condition which precedes and promotes cardiovascular damage. Physiological production of NO by eNOS depends on multiple interrelated steps involving compartmentalization, dimerization, and intracellular Ca2+ and phosphorylation-mediated mechanisms, in the presence of sufficient substrates and specific co-factors. This complex machinery may derange under pathophysiological conditions: for example, in a process defined as NOS uncoupling, eNOS may be converted from a NO producing enzyme to an enzyme that generates superoxide (O2•−). In recent years, the discovery of a non-canonical pathway for NO generation known as the nitrate–nitrite–NO pathway has further broadened the number of players regulating NO production in vessels. Concomitantly, the identification of eNOS as a nitrite reductase under hypoxia and anoxia suggests that this enzyme, utilizing distinct substrates according to the environmental conditions, may be equipped to produce NO under the full spectrum of oxygen tension experienced in vivo.

Understanding the dynamic interchange between multiple players that modulate the eNOS activity is fundamental to unravelling novel mechanisms and identifying potential pharmacological targets for the treatment and prevention of several cardiovascular disturbances.

This Special Issue is open to all investigations exploring the molecular components of this pathway, or aiming at elucidating alternative targets for this pathway, in order to clarify their impact in experimental models and provide preliminary findings to clinical translation. 

Prof. Dr. Monica Montagnani
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Antioxidants is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Nitric oxide (NO)
  • Endothelial NO synthase (eNOS)
  • NO-related drugs
  • Oxidative stress
  • Antioxidants
  • Endothelial dysfunction
  • Cardiovascular diseases

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

21 pages, 4445 KiB  
Article
Pharmacological Inhibition of Class III Alcohol Dehydrogenase 5: Turning Remote Ischemic Conditioning Effective in a Diabetic Stroke Model
by Syed Kashif Zaidi, Md Nasrul Hoda, Shams Tabrez and Mohammad Imran Khan
Antioxidants 2022, 11(10), 2051; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/antiox11102051 - 18 Oct 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1568
Abstract
The restoration of cerebral blood flow (CBF) to achieve brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) is the primary treatment for ischemic stroke, a significant cause of adult mortality and disability worldwide. Nitric oxide (NO) and its bioactive s-nitrosylated (SNO) reservoirs, such as [...] Read more.
The restoration of cerebral blood flow (CBF) to achieve brain tissue oxygenation (PbtO2) is the primary treatment for ischemic stroke, a significant cause of adult mortality and disability worldwide. Nitric oxide (NO) and its bioactive s-nitrosylated (SNO) reservoirs, such as s-nitrosoglutathione (GSNO), induce hypoxic vasodilation to enhance CBF during ischemia. The endogenous pool of SNOs/GSNO is enhanced via the activation of endothelial NO synthase (eNOS/NOS3) and by the suppression of class III alcohol dehydrogenase 5 (ADH5), also known as GSNO reductase (GSNOR). Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC), which augments NOS3 activity and SNO, is an emerging therapy in acute stroke. However, RIC has so far shown neutral effects in stroke clinical trials. As the majority of stroke patients are presented with endothelial dysfunctions and comorbidities, we tested the hypothesis that NOS3 dysfunction and diabetes will abolish the protective effects of RIC therapy in stroke, and the prior inhibition of GSNOR will turn RIC protective. Our data demonstrate that RIC during thrombotic stroke failed to enhance the CBF and the benefits of thrombolysis in NOS3 mutant (NOS3+/−) mice, a genetic model of NOS3 dysfunction. Interestingly, thrombotic stroke in diabetic mice enhanced the activity of GSNOR as early as 3 h post-stroke without decreasing the plasma nitrite (NO2). In thrombotic stroke, neither a pharmacological inhibitor of GSNOR (GRI) nor RIC therapy alone was protective in diabetic mice. However, prior treatment with GRI followed by RIC enhanced the CBF and improved recovery. In a reperfused stroke model, the GRI–RIC combination therapy in diabetic mice augmented PbtO2, a translatory signature of successful microvascular reflow. In addition, RIC therapy unexpectedly increased the inflammatory markers at 6 h post-stroke in diabetic stroke that were downregulated in combination with GRI while improving the outcomes. Thus, we conclude that preexisting NOS3 dysfunctions due to comorbidities may neutralize the benefits of RIC in stroke, which can be turned protective in combination with GRI. Our findings may support the future clinical trial of RIC in comorbid stroke. Further studies are warranted to test and develop SNO reservoirs as the blood-associated biomarker to monitor the response and efficacy of RIC therapy in stroke. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop