Urological Cancer 2022

A special issue of Cancers (ISSN 2072-6694). This special issue belongs to the section "Cancer Therapy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 December 2022) | Viewed by 30421

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editors

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Cancer of the urological sphere is a disease continuously growing in numbers in the statistics of tumor malignancies in Western countries. Although this fact is mainly due to the contemporary increase in the life expectancy of the people in these geographic areas, many other factors do also contribute to this growth. Urological cancer is a complex and varied disease of different organs and mainly affects the male population. In fact, kidney, prostate, and bladder cancer are regularly included in the top-ten list of the most frequent neoplasms in males in most statistics. The female population, however, has also increasingly found itself affected by renal and bladder cancer in the last decade. Considering these facts altogether, urological cancer is a problem of major concern in developed societies. This Topic Issue of Cancers intends to shed some light on the complexity of this field, and will consider all useful and appropriate contributions that scientists and clinicians may provide in order to improve urological cancer knowledge for patients’ benefit. The following paragraphs display only a partial view of this complexity.

Renal cancer is probably the best example of inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity in oncology, and remains a hot topic for clinicians and researchers worldwide. A precise histological and molecular characterization of the papillary group of renal cancer and a better profiling of immunotherapy in clear cell renal cell carcinomas are two of the most challenging areas today.

Prostate cancer is also a polyhedral disease. The correct definition of the so-called clinically insignificant disease; the dilemma of choosing not only between active clinical surveillance versus the focal therapy, but also between radical surgery versus radical radiotherapy; the management of the oligometastatic patient; and the richness of the genomic and epigenomic events underlying this disease will attract the attention of many urologists, pathologists, and basic researchers.

Cancer of the urinary tract also needs a more precise definition, as well as the investigation of several key points. The precise identification of the molecular routes involved; the diagnostic pathological criteria in the grey zones; the dilemma of T1G3 management; and the possible treatment options between superficial, nonmuscle-invasive, and muscle-invasive diseases will be particularly welcomed in this Issue.

Germ cell tumors of the testes still remain a puzzling problem in terms of conceptual tumorigenesis, with several grey zones having an impact in clinics. Basic researchers will find the perfect ground to venture deep into the borderland between anaplastic seminoma and embryonal carcinoma, as well as other poorly understood issues.

Dr. José I. López
Dr. Claudia Manini
Collection Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Cancers is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2900 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (16 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research, Review, Other

7 pages, 271 KiB  
Editorial
Advances in Urological Cancer in 2022, from Basic Approaches to Clinical Management
by Claudia Manini, Estíbaliz López-Fernández, José I. López and Javier C. Angulo
Cancers 2023, 15(5), 1422; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15051422 - 23 Feb 2023
Viewed by 1279
Abstract
This Special Issue includes 12 articles and 3 reviews dealing with several basic and clinical aspects of prostate, renal, and urinary tract cancer published during 2022 in Cancers, and intends to serve as a multidisciplinary chance to share the last advances in [...] Read more.
This Special Issue includes 12 articles and 3 reviews dealing with several basic and clinical aspects of prostate, renal, and urinary tract cancer published during 2022 in Cancers, and intends to serve as a multidisciplinary chance to share the last advances in urological neoplasms [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)

Research

Jump to: Editorial, Review, Other

14 pages, 712 KiB  
Article
Variables Associated with False-Positive PSA Results: A Cohort Study with Real-World Data
by Blanca Lumbreras, Lucy Anne Parker, Juan Pablo Caballero-Romeu, Luis Gómez-Pérez, Marta Puig-García, Maite López-Garrigós, Nuria García and Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 261; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15010261 - 30 Dec 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2079
Abstract
(1) Background: There are no real-world data evaluating the incidence of false-positive results. We analyzed the clinical and analytical factors associated with the presence of false-positive results in PSA determinations in practice. (2) Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients with a PSA [...] Read more.
(1) Background: There are no real-world data evaluating the incidence of false-positive results. We analyzed the clinical and analytical factors associated with the presence of false-positive results in PSA determinations in practice. (2) Methods: A prospective cohort study of patients with a PSA test was performed in clinical practice. We followed the patients by reviewing their medical records for 2 years or until the diagnosis of PCa was reached, whichever came first. (3) Results: False-positive PSA rate was 46.8% (95% CI 44.2–49.2%) and false-negative PSA rate was 2.8% (95% CI 2–3.5%). Patients aged 61–70 years and those over 70 years were more likely to have a false-positive result than those under 45 years (aOR 2.83, 95% CI 1.06–7.55, p = 0.038, and aOR 4.62, 95% CI 1.75–12.22, p = 0.002, respectively). Patients with urinary tract infection were more likely to have a false-positive result (aOR 8.42, 95% CI 2.42–29.34, p = 0.001). Patients with diabetes mellitus were less likely to have a false-positive result (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.41–0.98, p = 0.038); (4) Conclusions: This study has generated relevant information that could be very useful for shared decision making in clinical practice. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2622 KiB  
Article
Activin B and Activin C Have Opposing Effects on Prostate Cancer Progression and Cell Growth
by Karen L. Reader, Simon John-McHaffie, Sylvia Zellhuber-McMillan, Tim Jowett, David G. Mottershead, Heather E. Cunliffe and Elspeth J. Gold
Cancers 2023, 15(1), 147; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers15010147 - 27 Dec 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1561
Abstract
Current prognostic and diagnostic tests for prostate cancer are not able to accurately distinguish between aggressive and latent cancer. Members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGFB) family are known to be important in regulating prostate cell growth and some have been shown to [...] Read more.
Current prognostic and diagnostic tests for prostate cancer are not able to accurately distinguish between aggressive and latent cancer. Members of the transforming growth factor-β (TGFB) family are known to be important in regulating prostate cell growth and some have been shown to be dysregulated in prostate cancer. Therefore, the aims of this study were to examine expression of TGFB family members in primary prostate tumour tissue and the phenotypic effect of activins on prostate cell growth. Tissue cores of prostate adenocarcinoma and normal prostate were immuno-stained and protein expression was compared between samples with different Gleason grades. The effect of exogenous treatment with, or overexpression of, activins on prostate cell line growth and migration was examined. Activin B expression was increased in cores containing higher Gleason patterns and overexpression of activin B inhibited growth of PNT1A cells but increased growth and migration of the metastatic PC3 cells compared to empty vector controls. In contrast, activin C expression decreased in higher Gleason grades and overexpression increased growth of PNT1A cells and decreased growth of PC3 cells. In conclusion, increased activin B and decreased activin C expression is associated with increasing prostate tumor grade and therefore have potential as prognostic markers of aggressive prostate cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 3032 KiB  
Article
Ciliary Neurotrophic Factor Modulates Multiple Downstream Signaling Pathways in Prostate Cancer Inhibiting Cell Invasiveness
by Giovanni Tossetta, Sonia Fantone, Rosaria Gesuita, Gaia Goteri, Martina Senzacqua, Fabio Marcheggiani, Luca Tiano, Daniela Marzioni and Roberta Mazzucchelli
Cancers 2022, 14(23), 5917; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14235917 - 30 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1415
Abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the most common diagnosed tumor and is the second-leading cause of cancer-related death in men. If the cancer is organ-confined it can be treated by various ablative therapies such as RP (radical prostatectomy), RT (radiation therapy), brachytherapy, cryosurgery [...] Read more.
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains the most common diagnosed tumor and is the second-leading cause of cancer-related death in men. If the cancer is organ-confined it can be treated by various ablative therapies such as RP (radical prostatectomy), RT (radiation therapy), brachytherapy, cryosurgery or HIFU (High-Intensity Focused Ultrasound). However, advanced or metastatic PCa treatment requires systemic therapy involving androgen deprivation, but such patients typically progress to refractory disease designated as castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Interleukin-6 (IL-6) has been established as a driver of prostate carcinogenesis and tumor progression while less is known about the role of ciliary neurotrophic factor (CNTF), a member of the IL-6 cytokine family in prostate cancer. Moreover, MAPK/ERK, AKT/PI3K and Jak/STAT pathways that regulate proliferative, invasive and glucose-uptake processes in cancer progression are triggered by CNTF. Methods: We investigate CNTF and its receptor CNTFRα expressions in human androgen-responsive and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) by immunohistochemistry. Moreover, we investigated the role of CNTF in proliferative, invasive processes as well as glucose uptake using two cell models mimicking the PCa (LNCaP cell line) and CRPC (22Rv1 cell line). Conclusions: Our results showed that CNTF and CNTFRa were expressed in PCa and CRPC tissues and that CNTF has a pivotal role in prostate cancer environment remodeling and as a negative modulator of invasion processes of CRPC cell models. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 661 KiB  
Article
Intravesical Recurrence after Radical Nephroureterectomy in Patients with Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Is Associated with Flexible Diagnostic Ureteroscopy, but Not with Rigid Diagnostic Ureteroscopy
by Jee Soo Ha, Jinhyung Jeon, Jong Cheol Ko, Hye Sun Lee, Juyeon Yang, Daeho Kim, June Seok Kim, Won Sik Ham, Young Deuk Choi and Kang Su Cho
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5629; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14225629 - 16 Nov 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1061
Abstract
(1) Background: We assessed the impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) on intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma according to the type of URS. (2) Methods: Data on 491 consecutive patients who underwent RNU at two institutions between [...] Read more.
(1) Background: We assessed the impact of diagnostic ureteroscopy (URS) on intravesical recurrence (IVR) following radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for upper tract urothelial carcinoma according to the type of URS. (2) Methods: Data on 491 consecutive patients who underwent RNU at two institutions between 2016 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. The study population was classified according to the type of URS performed before RNU as follows: non-URS, rigid URS, and flexible URS. The study outcome was IVR occurring within 1 year of RNU. Univariable and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were used to estimate the risk of IVR. (3) Results: Altogether, 396 patients were included for analysis. Rigid and flexible URS were performed in 178 (45%) and 111 (28%) patients, respectively, while 107 (27%) patients did not undergo URS. IVR was identified in 99 (25%) patients. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that the flexible URS group was significantly associated with increased IVR, compared to the non-URS group (HR = 1.807, p = 0.0416). No significant difference in IVR was observed between the non-URS and rigid URS groups (HR = 1.301, p = 0.3388). (4) Conclusions: In patients with UTUC undergoing RNU, rigid URS may not increase the risk of IVR, whereas flexible URS appears to be associated with a higher risk of IVR. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1008 KiB  
Article
The Non-Interventional PAZOREAL Study to Assess the Effectiveness and Safety of Pazopanib in a Real-Life Setting: Reflecting a Changing mRCC Treatment Landscape
by Christian Doehn, Martin Bögemann, Viktor Grünwald, Manfred Welslau, Jens Bedke, Martin Schostak, Thomas Wolf, Rainer Ehneß, Elisa Degenkolbe, Stefanie Witecy and Peter J. Goebell
Cancers 2022, 14(22), 5486; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14225486 - 08 Nov 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1443
Abstract
The approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors represented a remarkable progression in the therapeutic landscape for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Yet, in the ever-evolving landscape of mRCC treatment, real-world data on these agents, including pazopanib, are scarce. [...] Read more.
The approval of tyrosine kinase inhibitors and checkpoint inhibitors represented a remarkable progression in the therapeutic landscape for the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Yet, in the ever-evolving landscape of mRCC treatment, real-world data on these agents, including pazopanib, are scarce. The non-interventional PAZOREAL study investigated the effectiveness and safety of pazopanib (first-line), nivolumab (second-line), and everolimus (second- and third-line) in a real-life setting. The multicentric study included 376 mRCC patients who received first-line treatment with pazopanib and assessed time on the drug (primary endpoint), overall survival, best responses, disease control rates, as well as safety signals and health-related quality of life. The median overall time on the drug was 10.0 months, with first-line pazopanib having a median time on drug of 6.3 months. The median overall survival was 35.9 months. The disease control rate for first-line pazopanib was 56.9%. No new safety signals were detected. PAZOREAL provides valuable real-world data for first-line treatment with pazopanib. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

21 pages, 7468 KiB  
Article
Identification and Validation of a Novel Ferroptotic Prognostic Genes-Based Signature of Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
by Zhiyuan Shi, Jianzhong Zheng, Qing Liang, Yankuo Liu, Yi Yang, Rui Wang, Mingshan Wang, Qian Zhang, Zuodong Xuan, Huimin Sun, Kejia Wang and Chen Shao
Cancers 2022, 14(19), 4690; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14194690 - 27 Sep 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 2600
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as one of the primary urological malignant neoplasms, shows poor survival, and the leading pathological type of RCC is clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Differing from other cell deaths (such as apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy), ferroptosis is characterized by [...] Read more.
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC), as one of the primary urological malignant neoplasms, shows poor survival, and the leading pathological type of RCC is clear cell RCC (ccRCC). Differing from other cell deaths (such as apoptosis, necroptosis, pyroptosis, and autophagy), ferroptosis is characterized by iron-dependence, polyunsaturated fatty acid oxidization, and lipid peroxide accumulation. We analyzed the ferroptosis database (FerrDb V2), Gene Expression Omnibus database, The Cancer Genome Atlas database, and the ArrayExpress database. Nine genes that were differentially expressed and related to prognosis were involved in the ferroptotic prognostic model via the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator Cox regression analysis, which was established in ccRCC patients from the kidney renal clear cell carcinoma (KIRC) cohort in TCGA database, and validated in ccRCC patients from the E-MTAB-1980 cohort in the ArrayExpress database. The signature could be an independent prognostic factor for ccRCC, and high-risk patients showed worse overall survival. The Gene Ontology and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes were utilized to investigate the potential mechanisms. The nine genes in ccRCC cells with erastin or RSL3 treatment were validated to find the crucial gene. The glutaminase 2 (GLS2) gene was upregulated during ferroptosis in ccRCC cells, and cells with GLS2 shRNA displayed lower survival, a lower glutathione level, and a high lipid peroxide level, which illustrated that GLS2 might be a ferroptotic suppressor in ccRCC. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 493 KiB  
Article
A Matched-Pair Analysis after Robotic and Retropubic Radical Prostatectomy: A New Definition of Continence and the Impact of Different Surgical Techniques
by Nicola d’Altilia, Vito Mancini, Ugo Giovanni Falagario, Leonardo Martino, Michele Di Nauta, Beppe Calò, Francesco Del Giudice, Satvir Basran, Benjamin I. Chung, Angelo Porreca, Lorenzo Bianchi, Riccardo Schiavina, Eugenio Brunocilla, Gian Maria Busetto, Carlo Bettocchi, Pasquale Annese, Luigi Cormio and Giuseppe Carrieri
Cancers 2022, 14(18), 4350; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14184350 - 07 Sep 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1577
Abstract
Background: Radical prostatectomy is considered the gold-standard treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer. The literature suggests there is no difference in oncological and functional outcomes between robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open (RRP). (2) Methods: The aim of this study was to [...] Read more.
Background: Radical prostatectomy is considered the gold-standard treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer. The literature suggests there is no difference in oncological and functional outcomes between robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and open (RRP). (2) Methods: The aim of this study was to compare continence recovery rates after RARP and RRP measured with 24 h pad weights and the International Consultation on Incontinence Questionnaire—Short Form (ICIQ-SF). After matching the population (1:1), 482 met the inclusion criteria, 241 patients per group. Continent patients with a 24 h pad test showing <20 g of urinary leakage were considered, despite severe incontinence, and categorized as having >200 g of urinary leakage. (3) Results: There was no difference between preoperative data. As for urinary continence (UC) and incontinence (UI) rates, RARP performed significantly better than RRP based on objective and subjective results at all evaluations. Univariable and multivariable Cox Regression Analysis pointed out that the only significant predictors of continence rates were the bilateral nerve sparing technique (1.25 (CI 1.02,1.54), p = 0.03) and the robotic surgical approach (1.42 (CI 1.18,1.69) p ≤ 0.001). (4) Conclusions: The literature reports different incidences of UC depending on assessment and definition of continence “without pads” or “social continence” based on number of used pads per day. In this, our first evaluation, the advantage of objective measurement through the weight of the 24 h and subjective measurement with the ICIQ-SF questionnaire best demonstrates the difference between the two surgical techniques by enhancing the use of robotic surgery over traditional surgery. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 1410 KiB  
Article
The Clinical Utility of Systemic Immune-Inflammation Index Supporting Charlson Comorbidity Index and CAPRA-S Score in Determining Survival after Radical Prostatectomy—A Single Centre Study
by Piotr Zapała, Karolina Garbas, Zbigniew Lewandowski, Łukasz Zapała, Aleksander Ślusarczyk, Cezary Ślusarczyk, Łukasz Mielczarek and Piotr Radziszewski
Cancers 2022, 14(17), 4135; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14174135 - 26 Aug 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1637
Abstract
The selection of candidates for the curative treatment of PCa requires a careful assessment of life expectancy. Recently, blood-count inflammatory markers have been introduced as prognosticators of oncological and non-oncological outcomes in different settings. This retrospective, monocentric study included 421 patients treated with [...] Read more.
The selection of candidates for the curative treatment of PCa requires a careful assessment of life expectancy. Recently, blood-count inflammatory markers have been introduced as prognosticators of oncological and non-oncological outcomes in different settings. This retrospective, monocentric study included 421 patients treated with radical prostatectomy (RP) for nonmetastatic PCa and aimed at determining the utility of a preoperative SII (neutrophil count × platelet count/lymphocyte count) in predicting survival after RP. Patients with high SIIs (≥900) presented significantly shorter survival (p = 0.02) and high SIIs constituted an independent predictor of overall survival [HR 2.54 (95%CI 1.24–5.21); p = 0.01] when adjusted for high (≥6) age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) [HR 2.75 (95%CI 1.27–5.95); p = 0.01] and high (≥6) CAPRA-S [HR 2.65 (95%CI 1.32–5.31); p = 0.006]. Patients with high scores (ACCI and/or CAPRA-S) and high SIIs were at the highest risk of death (p < 0.0001) with approximately a one-year survival loss during the first seven years after surgery. In subgroup of high CAPRA-S (≥6), patients with high ACCIs and high SIIs were at the highest risk of death (p <0.0001). Our study introduces the SII as a straightforward marker of mortality after RP that can be helpful in pre- and postoperative decision-making. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 1503 KiB  
Article
Safety and Efficacy of Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Elderly Patients with High-Risk Prostate Cancer
by Yuichi Hiroshima, Hitoshi Ishikawa, Yuma Iwai, Masaru Wakatsuki, Takanobu Utsumi, Hiroyoshi Suzuki, Koichiro Akakura, Masaoki Harada, Hideyuki Sakurai, Tomohiko Ichikawa and Hiroshi Tsuji
Cancers 2022, 14(16), 4015; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14164015 - 19 Aug 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1545
Abstract
Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a high-dose intensive treatment, whose safety and efficacy have been proven for prostate cancer. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of CIRT in elderly patients with prostate cancer. Patients aged 75 years or above at the initiation of [...] Read more.
Carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) is a high-dose intensive treatment, whose safety and efficacy have been proven for prostate cancer. This study aims to evaluate the outcomes of CIRT in elderly patients with prostate cancer. Patients aged 75 years or above at the initiation of CIRT were designated as the elderly group, and younger than 75 years as the young group. The overall survival (OS), disease-specific survival (DSS), biochemical control rate (BCR), biochemical relapse-free survival (BRFS), and adverse events were compared between the elderly and young patients with high-risk prostate cancer treated with CIRT. The elderly group comprised 173 of 927 patients treated for high-risk prostate cancer between April 2000 and May 2018. The overall median age was 69 (range: 45–92) years. The median follow-up period was 91.9 (range: 12.6–232.3) months. The 10-year OS, DSS, BCR, and BRFS rates in the young and elderly groups were 86.9%/71.5%, 96.6%/96.8%, 76.8%/88.1%, and 68.6%/64.3%, respectively. The OS (p < 0.001) was longer in the younger group and the BCR was better in the elderly group (p = 0.008). The DSS and BRFS did not differ significantly between the two groups. The rates of adverse events between the two groups did not differ significantly and no patient had an adverse event of Grade 4 or higher during the study period. CIRT may be as effective and safe in elderly patients as the treatment for high-risk prostate cancer. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 2942 KiB  
Article
Bisphenols A and S Alter the Bioenergetics and Behaviours of Normal Urothelial and Bladder Cancer Cells
by Ève Pellerin, Félix-Antoine Pellerin, Stéphane Chabaud, Frédéric Pouliot, Stéphane Bolduc and Martin Pelletier
Cancers 2022, 14(16), 4011; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14164011 - 19 Aug 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1466
Abstract
Bisphenol A (BPA) and bisphenol S (BPS) are used in the production of plastics. These endocrine disruptors can be released into the environment and food, resulting in the continuous exposure of humans to bisphenols (BPs). The bladder urothelium is chronically exposed to BPA [...] Read more.
Bisphenol A (BPA) and bisphenol S (BPS) are used in the production of plastics. These endocrine disruptors can be released into the environment and food, resulting in the continuous exposure of humans to bisphenols (BPs). The bladder urothelium is chronically exposed to BPA and BPS due to their presence in human urine samples. BPA and BPS exposure has been linked to cancer progression, especially for hormone-dependent cancers. However, the bladder is not recognized as a hormone-dependent tissue. Still, the presence of hormone receptors on the urothelium and their role in bladder cancer initiation and progression suggest that BPs could impact bladder cancer development. The effects of chronic exposure to BPA and BPS for 72 h on the bioenergetics (glycolysis and mitochondrial respiration), proliferation and migration of normal urothelial cells and non-invasive and invasive bladder cancer cells were evaluated. The results demonstrate that chronic exposure to BPs decreased urothelial cells’ energy metabolism and properties while increasing them for bladder cancer cells. These findings suggest that exposure to BPA and BPS could promote bladder cancer development with a potential clinical impact on bladder cancer progression. Further studies using 3D models would help to understand the clinical consequences of this exposure. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

11 pages, 547 KiB  
Article
Specialist versus Primary Care Prostate Cancer Follow-Up: A Process Evaluation of a Randomized Controlled Trial
by Barbara M. Wollersheim, Kristel M. van Asselt, Floris J. Pos, Emine Akdemir, Shifra Crouse, Henk G. van der Poel, Neil K. Aaronson, Lonneke V. van de Poll-Franse and Annelies H. Boekhout
Cancers 2022, 14(13), 3166; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14133166 - 28 Jun 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1434
Abstract
Background: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is currently comparing the effectiveness of specialist- versus primary care-based prostate cancer follow-up. This process evaluation assesses the reach and identified constructs for the implementation of primary care-based follow-up. Methods: A mixed-methods approach is used to assess [...] Read more.
Background: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) is currently comparing the effectiveness of specialist- versus primary care-based prostate cancer follow-up. This process evaluation assesses the reach and identified constructs for the implementation of primary care-based follow-up. Methods: A mixed-methods approach is used to assess the reach and the implementation through the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. We use quantitative data to evaluate the reach of the RCT and qualitative data (interviews) to indicate the perspectives of patients (n = 15), general practitioners (GPs) (n = 10), and specialists (n = 8). Thematic analysis is used to analyze the interview transcripts. Results: In total, we reached 402 (67%) patients from 12 hospitals and randomized them to specialist- (n = 201) or to primary care-based (n = 201) follow-up. From the interviews, we identify several advantages of primary care- versus specialist-based follow-up: it is closer to home, more accessible, and the relationship is more personal. Nevertheless, participants also identified challenges: guidelines should be implemented, communication and collaboration between primary and secondary care should be improved, quality indicators should be collected, and GPs should be compensated. Conclusion: Within an RCT context, 402 (67%) patients and their GPs were willing to receive/provide primary care-based follow-up. If the RCT shows that primary care is equally as effective as specialist-based follow-up, the challenges identified in this study need to be addressed to enable a smooth transition of prostate cancer follow-up to primary care. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 265 KiB  
Article
Clinical Benefits of Indocyanine Green Fluorescence in Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy
by Yu-Kuan Yang, Ming-Li Hsieh, Sy-Yuan Chen, Chung-Yi Liu, Po-Hung Lin, Hung-Cheng Kan, See-Tong Pang and Kai-Jie Yu
Cancers 2022, 14(12), 3032; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14123032 - 20 Jun 2022
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 1538
Abstract
Background: To compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of indocyanine green (ICG) administration in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and report the differences in the results between patients with benign and malignant renal tumors. Methods: From 2017 to 2020, 132 patients underwent RAPN at [...] Read more.
Background: To compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of indocyanine green (ICG) administration in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and report the differences in the results between patients with benign and malignant renal tumors. Methods: From 2017 to 2020, 132 patients underwent RAPN at our institution, including 21 patients with ICG administration. Clinical data obtained from our institution’s RAPN database were retrospectively reviewed. Intraoperative, postoperative, pathological, and functional outcomes of RAPN were assessed. Results: The pathological results indicated that among the 127 patients, 38 and 89 had received diagnoses of benign and malignant tumors, respectively. A longer operative time (311 vs. 271 min; p = 0.006) but superior preservation of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at 3-month follow-up (90% vs. 85%; p = 0.031) were observed in the ICG-RAPN group. Less estimated blood loss, shorter warm ischemia time, and superior preservation of eGFR at postoperative day 1 and 6-month follow-up were also noted, despite no significant differences. Among the patients with malignant tumors, less estimated blood loss (30 vs. 100 mL; p < 0.001) was reported in the ICG-RAPN subgroup. Conclusions: Patients with ICG-RAPN exhibited superior short-term renal function outcomes compared with the standard RAPN group. Of the patients with malignant tumors, ICG-RAPN was associated with less blood loss than standard RAPN without a more positive margin rate. Further studies with larger cohorts and prospective designs are necessary to verify the intraoperative and functional advantages of the green dye. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)

Review

Jump to: Editorial, Research, Other

13 pages, 3779 KiB  
Review
Clinical Applications of PSMA PET Examination in Patients with Prostate Cancer
by Sazan Rasul and Alexander R. Haug
Cancers 2022, 14(15), 3768; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14153768 - 02 Aug 2022
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 3207
Abstract
With the progressive aging of the population in industrially developed countries, as well as advances in diagnostic and biopsy techniques and improvements in patient awareness, the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is continuously increasing worldwide. Therefore, PCa is currently considered as the second [...] Read more.
With the progressive aging of the population in industrially developed countries, as well as advances in diagnostic and biopsy techniques and improvements in patient awareness, the incidence of prostate cancer (PCa) is continuously increasing worldwide. Therefore, PCa is currently considered as the second leading cause of tumor-related death. Early detection of the tumor and its metastasis is essential, as the rate of disease recurrence is high and occurs in 27% to 53% of all patients who underwent curative therapy with radical prostatectomy or local radiotherapy. In this regard, the prostate specific membrane antigens, abbreviated as PSMAs, are type II membrane proteins that are highly expressed on the surface of malignant prostate tissue in PCa, particularly in aggressive, androgen-deprived, metastatic, and hormone-refractory PCa, and they are inversely associated with the androgen level. Up to 95% of adenocarcinomas of the prostate express PSMA receptors on their surface. Today, radionuclides that bind to these PSMA peptides are widely accepted for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes to specifically image and target prostate tumor cells at the molecular level, a process referred to as targeted theranostics. Numerous studies have demonstrated that the integration of these peptides into diagnostic and therapeutic procedures plays a critical role in the primary staging and treatment decisions of especially high-risk PCa, expands therapeutic options for patients with advanced stage of prostate tumor, and prolongs patients’ survival rate. In this review article, we intend to briefly spotlight the latest clinical utilization of the PSMA-targeted radioligand PET imaging modality in patients with different stages of PCa. Furthermore, limitations and pitfalls of this diagnostic technique are presented. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

20 pages, 2054 KiB  
Review
Precision Targets for Intercepting the Lethal Progression of Prostate Cancer: Potential Avenues for Personalized Therapy
by Max Christenson, Chung-Seog Song, Ya-Guang Liu and Bandana Chatterjee
Cancers 2022, 14(4), 892; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14040892 - 11 Feb 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3083
Abstract
Organ-confined prostate cancer of low-grade histopathology is managed with radiation, surgery, active surveillance, or watchful waiting and exhibits a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95%, while metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is incurable, holding a 5-year OS of 30%. Treatment options for advanced PCa—metastatic [...] Read more.
Organ-confined prostate cancer of low-grade histopathology is managed with radiation, surgery, active surveillance, or watchful waiting and exhibits a 5-year overall survival (OS) of 95%, while metastatic prostate cancer (PCa) is incurable, holding a 5-year OS of 30%. Treatment options for advanced PCa—metastatic and non-metastatic—include hormone therapy that inactivates androgen receptor (AR) signaling, chemotherapy and genome-targeted therapy entailing synthetic lethality of tumor cells exhibiting aberrant DNA damage response, and immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI), which suppresses tumors with genomic microsatellite instability and/or deficient mismatch repair. Cancer genome sequencing uncovered novel somatic and germline mutations, while mechanistic studies are revealing their pathological consequences. A microRNA has shown biomarker potential for stratifying patients who may benefit from angiogenesis inhibition prior to ICI. A 22-gene expression signature may select high-risk localized PCa, which would not additionally benefit from post-radiation hormone therapy. We present an up-to-date review of the molecular and therapeutic aspects of PCa, highlight genomic alterations leading to AR upregulation and discuss AR-degrading molecules as promising anti-AR therapeutics. New biomarkers and druggable targets are shaping innovative intervention strategies against high-risk localized and metastatic PCa, including AR-independent small cell-neuroendocrine carcinoma, while presenting individualized treatment opportunities through improved design and precision targeting. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

14 pages, 1717 KiB  
Systematic Review
Comparison of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron-Emission Tomography Imaging in Primary Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
by Yi Zhao, Benjamin S. Simpson, Naomi Morka, Alex Freeman, Alex Kirkham, Daniel Kelly, Hayley C. Whitaker, Mark Emberton and Joseph M. Norris
Cancers 2022, 14(14), 3497; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/cancers14143497 - 19 Jul 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2169
Abstract
Multiparametric magnetic-resonance imaging (mpMRI) has proven utility in diagnosing primary prostate cancer. However, the diagnostic potential of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA PET) has yet to be established. This study aims to systematically review the current literature comparing the diagnostic performance of [...] Read more.
Multiparametric magnetic-resonance imaging (mpMRI) has proven utility in diagnosing primary prostate cancer. However, the diagnostic potential of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography (PSMA PET) has yet to be established. This study aims to systematically review the current literature comparing the diagnostic performance of mpMRI and PSMA PET imaging to diagnose primary prostate cancer. A systematic literature search was performed up to December 2021. Quality analyses were conducted using the QUADAS-2 tool. The reference standard was whole-mount prostatectomy or prostate biopsy. Statistical analysis involved the pooling of the reported diagnostic performances of each modality, and differences in per-patient and per-lesion analysis were compared using a Fisher’s exact test. Ten articles were included in the meta-analysis. At a per-patient level, the pooled values of sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC) for mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT were 0.87 (95% CI: 0.83–0.91) vs. 0.93 (95% CI: 0.90–0.96, p < 0.01); 0.47 (95% CI: 0.23–0.71) vs. 0.54 (95% CI: 0.23–0.84, p > 0.05); and 0.84 vs. 0.91, respectively. At a per-lesion level, the pooled sensitivity, specificity, and AUC value for mpMRI and PSMA PET/CT were lower, at 0.63 (95% CI: 0.52–0.74) vs. 0.79 (95% CI: 0.62–0.92, p < 0.001); 0.88 (95% CI: 0.81–0.95) vs. 0.71 (95% CI: 0.47–0.90, p < 0.05); and 0.83 vs. 0.84, respectively. High heterogeneity was observed between studies. PSMA PET/CT may better confirm the presence of prostate cancer than mpMRI. However, both modalities appear comparable in determining the localisation of the lesions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Urological Cancer 2022)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop