New Directions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy

A special issue of Current Oncology (ISSN 1718-7729).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 June 2022) | Viewed by 2805

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, University of Western Ontario, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
Interests: stereotactic radiotherapy; lung cancer; breast cancer; functional lung imaging; image fusion

Special Issue Information

Dear colleagues,

Modern clinical oncology continues to experience a rapid and remarkable transformation. We have an ever-increasing understanding of the cellular mechanisms that control the progression of disease, we have systemic therapies that allow us to attack cancer at a molecular level, both via a direct attack upon the internal mechanisms of the cell, as well as by harnessing the body’s own immune system to target and to destroy the disease. In parallel with this, advances in imaging technology have enabled us to identify malignancy earlier, while advances in computing power have enable us to treat even very small, mobile cancers more precisely than ever before.

Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) implies the delivery of large doses of radiation to very small volumes, in a very short period of time, using sophisticated technology to plan and to deliver the treatment. SBRT has become a valuable adjunct to standard surgery and chemotherapy in some situations, and a viable alternative to surgery in other situations. In a very short time, it has grown from being a highly specialized intervention practiced by only a few centres, becoming a modern standard-of-care at most academic centres. In doing so, SBRT has offered improved outcomes to our patients, and exciting new opportunities to our clinicians and researchers. The burden of cancer continues to grow as and our population continues to age. SBRT is a powerful weapon in our battle against cancers of all types.

The availability of SBRT will continue to expand, along with the indications for its use, and therefore it is critical for radiation oncologists, as well as the larger body of oncologists in general, to understand this exciting treatment modality as thoroughly as possible. This Special Issue therefore aims to provide a thorough review of SBRT, examining its genesis, clinical applications and its emerging relationship to other oncologic treatment modalities, pointing the way forward to the next decade and beyond for this novel, exciting treatment.

Dr. Brian Yaremko
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Current Oncology is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2200 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • stereotactic radiotherapy
  • stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy

Published Papers (1 paper)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

16 pages, 2212 KiB  
Article
Impact of Pre-Treatment NLR and Other Hematologic Biomarkers on the Outcomes of Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy
by Marina Aduquaye, Sheen Dube, Bashir Bashir, Amitava Chowdhury, Naseer Ahmed, Ahmet Leylek, Julian Kim, Pascal Lambert, Oliver Bucher, William Hunter, Gokulan Sivananthan, Rashmi Koul and Shrinivas Rathod
Curr. Oncol. 2022, 29(1), 193-208; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/curroncol29010019 - 04 Jan 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1779
Abstract
Introduction: We evaluated the association of pre-treatment immunologic biomarkers on the outcomes of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, all newly diagnosed early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT between January [...] Read more.
Introduction: We evaluated the association of pre-treatment immunologic biomarkers on the outcomes of early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). Materials and methods: In this retrospective study, all newly diagnosed early-stage NSCLC treated with SBRT between January 2010 and December 2017 were screened and included for further analysis. The pre-treatment neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), monocyte lymphocyte ratio (MLR), and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were calculated. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated by Kaplan–Meier. Multivariable models were constructed to determine the impact of different biomarkers and the Akaike information criterion (AIC), index of adequacy, and scaled Brier scores were calculated. Results: A total of 72 patients were identified and 61 were included in final analysis. The median neutrophil count at baseline was 5.4 × 109/L (IQR: 4.17–7.05 × 109/L). Median lymphocyte count was 1.63 × 109/L (IQR: 1.29–2.10 × 109/L), median monocyte count was 0.65 × 109/L (IQR: 0.54–0.83 × 109/L), median platelet count was 260.0 × 109/L (IQR: 211.0–302.0 × 109/L). The median NLR was 3.42 (IQR: 2.38–5.04), median MLR was 0.39 (IQR: 0.31–0.53), and median PLR was 156.4 (IQR: 117.2–197.5). On multivariable regression a higher NLR was associated with worse OS (p = 0.01; HR-1.26; 95% CI 1.04–1.53). The delta AIC between the two multivariable models was 3.4, suggesting a moderate impact of NLR on OS. On multivariable analysis, higher NLR was associated with poor RFS (p = 0.001; NLR^1 HR 0.36; 0.17–0.78; NLR^2 HR-1.16; 95% CI 1.06–1.26) with a nonlinear relationship. The delta AIC between the two multivariable models was 16.2, suggesting a strong impact of NLR on RFS. In our cohort, MLR and PLR were not associated with RFS or OS in multivariable models. Conclusions: Our study suggests NLR, as a biomarker of systemic inflammation, is an independent prognostic factor for OS and RFS. The nonlinear relationship with RFS may indicate a suitable immunological environment is needed for optimal SBRT action and tumoricidal mechanisms. These findings require further validation in independent cohorts. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Directions in Stereotactic Radiotherapy)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop