Identifying Best Practices and Supporting Innovative Teaching in STEMM Higher Education

A special issue of Education Sciences (ISSN 2227-7102). This special issue belongs to the section "STEM Education".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2022) | Viewed by 25366

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
Interests: Parkinson’s disease; venous thrombosis; education (active learning and STEMM)

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Curriculum & Instruction, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX 79409, USA
Interests: P-20 STEM education

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Professor of Biology and Director of Undergraduate Research and Creativity University of Wisconsin-La Crosse, La Crosse, WI 54601, USA
Interests: effects of hibernation on blood clotting in 13-lined ground squirrels

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Biology Department, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA
Interests: development of RNA-based therapeutic molecules for blood-related diseases

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Biology, Winthrop University, 202 Dalton Hall, Rock Hill, SC 29733, USA
Interests: prostate tumor cell metastasis

Special Issue Information

Reports and research on undergraduate and graduate STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine) education indicate the importance of STEMM faculty engaging with students, both inside and outside the classroom. Therefore, STEMM faculty play a vital role in utilizing best practices for engaging, retaining, and supporting (under)graduate students in their classroom-based STEMM learning—especially among students who are first-generation, under-represented in STEMM, and/or from under-resourced backgrounds. Further, it is important that innovative STEMM faculty are provided with institutional supports to engage in best practices for teaching STEMM subjects, such as promoting active learning and fostering group collaboration, to name a few.

        In this Special Issue of Education Sciences, we seek manuscripts covering four different areas of higher education:

  1. We invite papers from STEMM faculty, graduate students, and higher education instructors who teach undergraduate and/or graduate courses with STEMM students who expertly infuse their own life experiences into their teaching (storytelling); provide avenues for students to engage in real-world scenarios or clinical experiences (role playing); scaffold ways for students to communicate and collaborate in class (cooperative learning); offer ways for students to leverage their unique cultural knowledge and/or backgrounds (culturally responsive pedagogy); challenge students’ prior knowledge to stimulate personalized discussion with and among students (via inquiry or discrepant events); stimulate students’ interests in STEMM using historical or personal artifacts (case studies); encourage opportunities for students to explore and discuss the interrelated nature of STEMM in the world (translating classroom/online knowledge to the world at-large).
  2. We invite papers that are focused on teaching an online STEMM course that challenges and engages students.
  3. Furthermore, we solicit manuscripts that are also tasked with describing the impacts of these best practices on students’ cognitive or non-cognitive learning in STEMM.
  4. Finally, we solicit manuscripts on recommendations for institutional changes to incentivize STEMM faculty to engage the described best practice.

Dear Colleagues,

        Ever since you were in school, you have been influenced and impacted by teachers and their “style of teaching”. You have now been developing, or have developed, your own teaching philosophy.

        There are many great ways to teach, from the didactic lecture to engaged/active/blended teaching styles. We have incorporated self-learning, research, and many other innovative techniques to improve the classroom scenario for an optimal experience in student learning. Furthermore, in the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, we are being challenged as we adapt to online teaching styles from the classroom.

        Reports and research on undergraduate and graduate STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine) education indicate the importance of STEMM faculty engaging with students, both inside and outside the classroom. Therefore, STEMM faculty play a vital role in utilizing best practices for engaging, retaining, and supporting (under)graduate students in their classroom-based STEMM learning—especially among students who are first-generation, under-represented in STEMM, and/or from under-resourced backgrounds. Further, it is important that innovative STEMM faculty are provided institutional supports to engage in best practices for teaching STEMM subjects, such as promoting active learning and fostering group collaboration, to name a few.

        In this Special Issue of Education Sciences, we seek manuscripts covering four different areas of higher education:

(i) We invite papers from STEMM faculty, graduate students, and higher education instructors who teach undergraduate and/or graduate courses with STEMM students who:

  • expertly infuse their own life experiences into their teaching (storytelling);
  • provide avenues for students to engage in real-world scenarios or clinical experiences (role playing);
  • scaffold ways for students to communicate and collaborate in class (cooperative learning);
  • offer ways for students to leverage their unique cultural knowledge and/or backgrounds (culturally responsive pedagogy);
  • challenge students’ prior knowledge to stimulate personalized discussion with and among students (via inquiry or discrepant events);
  • stimulating students’ interests in STEMM using historical or personal artifacts (case studies);
  • encourage opportunities for students to explore and discuss the interrelated nature of STEMM in the world (translating classroom/online knowledge to the world at-large).

(ii) We invite papers that are focused on teaching an online STEMM course that challenges and engages students.

(iii) Furthermore, we solicit manuscripts that are also tasked with describing the impacts of these best practices on students’ cognitive or non-cognitive learning in STEMM.

(iv) Finally, we solicit manuscripts on recommendations for institutional changes to incentivize STEMM faculty to engage the described best practice.

        Original research papers, reviews, commentaries, and cases studies are all welcome.

        The deadline for submission to this Special Theme Issue is from now until November 1, 2021.

Dr. Frank C. Church
Dr. Rebecca Hite
Prof. Scott Cooper
Dr. Yolanda M. Fortenberry
Dr. Laura Glasscock
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Education Sciences is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • STEMM faculty innovation in the classroom
  • supporting undergraduate and graduate STEMM students
  • STEMM teaching and learning
  • institutional support for STEMM best practices

Published Papers (7 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

16 pages, 582 KiB  
Article
STEM Education and Problem-Solving in Space Science: A Case Study with CanSat
by José Contente and Cecília Galvão
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(4), 251; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci12040251 - 31 Mar 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3493
Abstract
Research has shown that hands-on projects promote stem education, namely via problem-solving. CanSat, literally ‘satellite in a can’, is a stem educational project promoted by the European Space Agency. This paper addresses this issue by researching this STEM project and trying to understand [...] Read more.
Research has shown that hands-on projects promote stem education, namely via problem-solving. CanSat, literally ‘satellite in a can’, is a stem educational project promoted by the European Space Agency. This paper addresses this issue by researching this STEM project and trying to understand how secondary students solve problems in the STEM CanSat project. We use qualitative techniques of data collection and analysis. The results showed that students used sophisticated thinking strategies to process information within this interdisciplinary project: (a) cognitive testing, cognitive organization, cognitive regulation, and monitoring, in addition to computer language and physical-mathematical calculations, are cognitive and metacognitive behavior strategies revealed in the CanSat; (b) problem-solving was suggested as a specific model, where students’ higher cognitive and metacognitive ordering processes deepen in project development; (c) computational, lateral, or divergent and convergent thinking were detected as thinking types of students associated with and mobilized in the course of problem-solving. The findings of this research have practical implications for STEM education in space science. Hands-on projects using problem-solving are an essential strategy to promote STEM. This project reinforces this. Additionally, they are a starting point to promote meaningful learning and new thinking types. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

10 pages, 582 KiB  
Article
Instructional Innovations in College-Level Molecular Bioscience Labs during the Pandemic-Induced Shift to Online Learning
by Alder Yu, Jaclyn Wisinski, Todd Osmundson, Anton Sanderfoot, Scott Cooper and Jennifer Klein
Educ. Sci. 2022, 12(4), 230; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci12040230 - 23 Mar 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3404
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in an unprecedented period of both crisis and innovation in higher education. The shift to an online learning environment was particularly problematic for courses in which students learn disciplinary practices. Scientific practice requires hands-on training and collaborative engagement with [...] Read more.
The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in an unprecedented period of both crisis and innovation in higher education. The shift to an online learning environment was particularly problematic for courses in which students learn disciplinary practices. Scientific practice requires hands-on training and collaborative engagement with instructors and peers, dimensions of the learning environment that were challenging to recreate online. Here, we describe the resulting instructional innovations and challenges experienced in shifting multiple undergraduate- and graduate-level molecular bioscience labs, including Genetics, Cell Biology, Bioinformatics, and Advanced Microscopy, to an online learning environment. Instructors pursued novel approaches, techniques, and at-home lab tools with varying success. Many innovations were retained after the transition back to an in-person learning environment because they uniquely supported previously overlooked aspects of student learning. Consistent with other reports, we found that marginalized students pursuing science were disproportionately burdened by COVID-19 and the shift to an online learning environment. A description of what worked for online learning, what didn’t, and what is worth holding onto in the future is valuable for constructing learning environments that effectively support learners in their disciplinary practice. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 499 KiB  
Article
Promoting the Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion in Organic Chemistry Education through Undergraduate Research Experiences at WSSU
by Fenghai Guo, Jayla Young, Nichele Deese, Ti’Bran Pickens-Flynn, Dustin Sellers, Dexter Perkins and Mamudu Yakubu
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(8), 394; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci11080394 - 02 Aug 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2435
Abstract
Undergraduate research is well recognized as an effective high-impact educational practice associated with student success in higher education. Actively engaging students in research experiences is considered as one of the several high-impact practices by many agencies including the American Chemical Society. Developing and [...] Read more.
Undergraduate research is well recognized as an effective high-impact educational practice associated with student success in higher education. Actively engaging students in research experiences is considered as one of the several high-impact practices by many agencies including the American Chemical Society. Developing and maintaining an active undergraduate research program benefits both the faculty and students especially those from under-represented minority groups (URM). The infusion of research experiences into undergraduate curriculum enables students from all backgrounds to develop independent critical thinking skills, written and oral communications skills that are very important for successful careers in “STEM” area. Several strategies and activities such as a Peer Mentoring Program (PMP), funded research activities, the infusion of research into organic chemistry labs, undergraduate professional development, research group meetings, presentations at regional/national conferences, and publishing as co-authors on peer-review papers are vital in creating a welcoming research group that promotes the diversity, equity, and inclusion in organic chemistry education. The experiences working on funded research projects, presenting their research data at conferences and publishing papers as co-authors will greatly increase the under-represented minority (URM) students’ chance in landing a job or getting admitted into graduate/professional programs in STEM area. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 1687 KiB  
Article
Active Learning: Basic Science Workshops, Clinical Science Cases, and Medical Role-Playing in an Undergraduate Biology Course
by Frank C. Church
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(8), 370; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci11080370 - 21 Jul 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 4961
Abstract
Effective undergraduate courses increasingly blend elements of active learning with a more traditional lecture format. Designing and implementing active learning sessions that engage, educate, and are challenging and workable in a group setting are essential for student learners. In addition, active learning sessions [...] Read more.
Effective undergraduate courses increasingly blend elements of active learning with a more traditional lecture format. Designing and implementing active learning sessions that engage, educate, and are challenging and workable in a group setting are essential for student learners. In addition, active learning sessions take concepts of fundamental knowledge and apply them to a more relevant and real-world environment. Thus, effective active learning lesson plans enable students to thrive in their educational experience, and this potentially enhances material retention. Presented here are examples of the critical components of active learning engagement in an undergraduate biology course. First, basic science workshops let students apply basic scientific principles to biomedical science scenarios. Second, clinical science case studies help students understand the interplay between basic and clinical sciences in a patient-based medical case format. Finally, medical role-playing allows student teams to understand the complexity of medical care, moving from the patient’s presenting symptoms to formulating a diagnosis and treatment plan. These exercises strengthen several aspects of active learning, especially those related to student-team-based collaboration, conversation, coordination, and compilation. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 21631 KiB  
Article
The Role of Competitive Robotics in Providing Context to Classroom Learning and Technical Skill Development in School Age Students—A Survey of Current Avenues, Assessment, and Path Forward with Systematic Implementation
by Rajeev Dwivedi, Arpan Kumar, Bharathy Babu, Nipun Grandhi, Rishi Meka and Varun Ahuja
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(4), 167; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci11040167 - 02 Apr 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2988
Abstract
Finding context, examples, and ample hands-on experimentation is fundamental for understanding complex ideas in subjects such as science and math. Recent popularity of competitive robotics has become a catalyst in the development of DIY and hobby kits. Manufacturers have made available easy to [...] Read more.
Finding context, examples, and ample hands-on experimentation is fundamental for understanding complex ideas in subjects such as science and math. Recent popularity of competitive robotics has become a catalyst in the development of DIY and hobby kits. Manufacturers have made available easy to work, re-configurable, and functional, structural elements as well as control electronics. Additionally, extensive participation from the open-source software community is providing cutting edge and effective software. Despite all the right ingredients, competitive robotics continues to be unregulated and non-standardized. Additionally, in absence of regulations and standards, the organizers, suppliers, educators, and participants are left to their own means and resources that necessarily may not align with systematic learning. The cost of approved competitive kits as well as field kits becomes inhibitive for students from poorer communities. This paper surveys a wide range of competitive robotics avenues available to school-age students. A survey with various stake holders including participants, mentors, referees, and organizers is done and findings are included. A path for standardizing competitive robotics within the framework of the World Robotics League is found to be an effective tool to train the students. A description of the World Robotics League framework and initial findings are reported. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

13 pages, 266 KiB  
Article
Supporting Undergraduate STEMM Education: Perspectives from Faculty Mentors and Learning Assistants in Calculus II
by Rebecca Hite, Levi Johnson, Richard Carlos L. Velasco, G. Brock Williams and Ken Griffith
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(3), 143; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci11030143 - 23 Mar 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 3029
Abstract
In higher education, Learning Assistants (LAs)—a relatively recent evolution grounded in peer mentorship models—are gaining popularity in classrooms as universities strive to meet the needs of undergraduate learners. Unlike Teaching Assistants, LAs are undergraduate students who receive continuous training from faculty mentors in [...] Read more.
In higher education, Learning Assistants (LAs)—a relatively recent evolution grounded in peer mentorship models—are gaining popularity in classrooms as universities strive to meet the needs of undergraduate learners. Unlike Teaching Assistants, LAs are undergraduate students who receive continuous training from faculty mentors in content-area coaching and pedagogical skills. As near-peers, they assist assigned groups of undergraduates (students) during class. Research on LAs suggests that they are significant in mitigating high Drop-Fail-Withdrawal rates of large enrollment undergraduate science, technology, engineering, mathematics, and medical (STEMM) courses. However, there is a dearth of description regarding the learning between LAs and STEMM faculty mentors. This paper reports on perspectives of faculty mentors and their cooperating LAs in regard to their learning relationships during a Calculus II at a research-oriented university during Spring of 2020. Using an exploratory-descriptive qualitative design, faculty (oral responses) and LAs (written responses) reflected on their relationship. Content analysis (coding) resulted in four salient categories (by faculty and LA percentages, respectively) in: Showing Care and Fostering Relationships (47%, 23%); Honing Pedagogical Skills (27%, 36%); Being Prepared for Class and Students (23%, 28%); and Developing Content Knowledge in Calculus (3%, 13%). Benefits of LAs to faculty and ways to commence LA programs at institutions are also discussed. Full article

Other

Jump to: Research

11 pages, 255 KiB  
Viewpoint
Useful Teaching Strategies in STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine) Education during the COVID-19 Pandemic
by Frank C. Church, Scott T. Cooper, Yolanda M. Fortenberry, Laura N. Glasscock and Rebecca Hite
Educ. Sci. 2021, 11(11), 752; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/educsci11110752 - 19 Nov 2021
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 3236
Abstract
The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic throughout the world continue. These impacts influence many aspects of life, work, healthcare, and education in the U.S., which are drastically affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, a considerable challenge to tertiary-level education has been how to [...] Read more.
The impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic throughout the world continue. These impacts influence many aspects of life, work, healthcare, and education in the U.S., which are drastically affected by the COVID-19 pandemic. Thus, a considerable challenge to tertiary-level education has been how to adapt our teaching styles and modalities to keep all stakeholders (students, faculty, teaching assistants, and staff) safe in lectures and labs. This viewpoint presents 15 teaching lessons and tips for undergraduate and graduate STEMM (Science, Technology, Engineering, Mathematics, and Medicine) education for face-to-face, hybrid, and distance learning. The goal was to describe teaching strategies that could be adaptable to most STEMM courses, independent of the classroom size, which is valuable for those educational settings capable of migrating from a classroom to either a hybrid or strictly online teaching environment. Although some of these teaching tips were straightforward, we believe collectively that they (1) provide safety and stability to the students and the instructors; (2) help to improve communications between faculty and students that the pandemic had strained; (3) strengthen student attention; (4) facilitate the transition from the classroom to online teaching; (5) enable the use of new technologies; and (6) offer teaching practices we imagined for educational scenarios post-SARS-CoV-2. Finally, we hope these teaching strategies offer valuable insight as we continue to navigate STEMM education during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Full article
Back to TopTop