Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
1.4
0.9
Journals
Games
Special Issues
Group Behaviour
share announcement

Group Behaviour

A special issue of Games (ISSN 2073-4336). This special issue belongs to the section "Behavioral and Experimental Game Theory".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (10 February 2022) | Viewed by 9979

Special Issue Editors

Prof. Dr. Anna Conte

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Management, Sapienza University of Rome, 00185 Rome, Italy
Interests: econometric modelling of experimental data (experimetrics); structural model estimation; monte Carlo simulation techniques; finite and continuous mixture models; estimation of limited dependent variable models; panel data; simultaneous equation systems; survey methodology; survey data analysis
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Patrizia Sbriglia

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Economics, University of Campania Luigi Vanvitelli, 81100 Caserta, Italy
Interests: game theory; experimental game theory; learning behavior; social influence; social identity; group behavior; trust and reciprocity
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Dr. Marco Stimolo

E-Mail Website
Co-Guest Editor
Department of Economics, University of Campania L. Vanvitelli, C.so Gran Priorato di Malta, 81043 Capua, Italy
Interests: trust; trustworthiness; growth; inequality; crime; behavioral anomalies

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Formal or informal membership of a group has been shown to significantly influence individuals’ behaviour in a wide range of economically relevant situations: From the shaping of consumers’ preferences, to investment decisions and cooperative choices. Systematic in-group behaviour may have several catalysts with different economic implications: conformity; social identity; moral commitment or beliefs-dependent preferences (e.g., guilt aversion).

We encourage submission of theoretical and experimental studies aimed at disentangling the effect of the driving forces of group behaviour in different decision environments, e.g., coordination games, social dilemmas, auctions and decision making under risk and ambiguity.

Literature reviews or appraisals of existing literature are also encouraged.

Dr. Anna Conte
Guest Editor
Dr. Patrizia Sbriglia
Dr. Marco Stimolo
Co-Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Games is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • group behaviour
  • conformity
  • social identity
  • beliefs-dependent preferences
  • moral commitment

Published Papers (4 papers)

Download All Papers
Order results
Result details
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

20 pages, 2745 KiB  
Article
Consciously Uncertain: A Bayesian Analysis of Preferences Formation
by Marco Stimolo, Sergio Beraldo, Salvatore Capasso and Valerio Filoso
Games 2022, 13(1), 14; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/g13010014 - 22 Jan 2022
Viewed by 2190
Abstract
We investigate experimentally whether players deliberately use irrelevant market cues to shape their evaluations of a traded item. We implement a repeated Vickrey median price selling auction of an unusual bad where players are informed on the market price and on the three [...] Read more.
We investigate experimentally whether players deliberately use irrelevant market cues to shape their evaluations of a traded item. We implement a repeated Vickrey median price selling auction of an unusual bad where players are informed on the market price and on the three lowest or highest asks. We elicited players’ consideration of market signals through a questionnaire at the end of the auction. We find that extreme information has a stronger influence on players’ evaluations than the market price. However, players’ consideration of the market signals explains their behavioral reactivity to the market price but not to the extremes. Hence, players deliberately use an unbiased estimator of the central tendency of the appraisals distribution, while extreme asks’ influence is consistent with a priming effect. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Group Behaviour)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

16 pages, 2601 KiB  
Article
White List: An Administrative Tool to Contrast Crime
by Amelia Barletta, Carlo Capuano and Alessandro De Iudicibus
Games 2022, 13(1), 8; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/g13010008 - 30 Dec 2021
Viewed by 2189
Abstract
White Lists are lists of firms set up at each Italian prefecture. It is a relatively young instrument born as an experimental project designed to solve problems for particular conditions of crime and corruption in the Italian territory. This work aims to understand [...] Read more.
White Lists are lists of firms set up at each Italian prefecture. It is a relatively young instrument born as an experimental project designed to solve problems for particular conditions of crime and corruption in the Italian territory. This work aims to understand if the “White List” tool can represent a reliable legality tool for the contracting station and representation for firms registered in these lists, an incentive to obtain awards for faster times of public procurement. Through a descriptive survey, we will try to photograph the “White List” phenomenon by comparing firms belonging to these lists with companies not belonging to them but which are similar in terms of size and economic sector. The comparison takes off some differences in the financial structure of the two groups of companies. in particular, the White List’s firms show a better profitability and a lower recourse to third-party capital. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Group Behaviour)
►▼ Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 270 KiB  
Article
The Impact of Discretionary Measurement Criteria on Investors’ Judgement and Decisions
by Tiago Cruz Gonçalves
Games 2022, 13(1), 3; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/g13010003 - 23 Dec 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2279
Abstract
This study investigates the effect on nonprofessional investors’ judgements and decisions of discretionary measurement choices. Using a paper-and-pencil experience, we collect and analyze information regarding investment amounts as well as past and future financial performance judgements of firms’ earnings by manipulating fair value [...] Read more.
This study investigates the effect on nonprofessional investors’ judgements and decisions of discretionary measurement choices. Using a paper-and-pencil experience, we collect and analyze information regarding investment amounts as well as past and future financial performance judgements of firms’ earnings by manipulating fair value (mark-to-market and mark-to-model) criteria and benchmarking it with historical cost-based financial statements. We proxy nonprofessional investors with graduate students from a business school. Our results show evidence that nonprofessional investors view fair value changes as permanent. We argue for a cashflow volatility factor. Contrary to previous research, we do not find evidence of any effect on investors’ willingness to invest (average budget amounts invested) or performance judgments (past and future). We corroborate previous evidence that investors rank measurement concepts’ relevance differently for different classes, although, on average, mark-to-market fair values and historical cost are rated more relevant and reliable than mark-to-model fair values. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Group Behaviour)

Other

Jump to: Research

3 pages, 166 KiB  
Commentary
What Economists Can Learn from “The Power of Us: Harnessing Our Shared Identities for Personal and Collective Success” by Jay J. Van Bavel and Dominick J. Packer
by Daniela Grieco
Games 2022, 13(2), 23; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/g13020023 - 10 Mar 2022
Viewed by 2316
Abstract
Social identity theory has become increasingly important for economists. I discuss the contribution of Van Bavel and Packer’s “The Power of Us” in light of what economists (especially experimental ones) can learn from their research. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Group Behaviour)
Show export options expand_more Show export options expand_less
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:
 
Displaying articles 1-4
Back to TopTop