ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Using Alternative Sources of Big Data in Health

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Communication and Informatics".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2021) | Viewed by 4783

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Physics, University of Salerno, 84084 Fisciano, SA, Italy
Interests: public health; complex systems; epidemiology; environmental health; food control

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Big Data is a transversal and increasingly relevant component of the contemporary social system: the collection, storage, processing, and analysis of Big Data includes immense amounts of data and is cross-sectorial with potentially immense outcomes.
One of the most important sectors is health, in all its declinations, such as individual health behaviors, medicine, healthcare and public health. In this setting, as in all others, Big Data come from an increasing plurality of sources.
These data sources include, for instance, social media, internet clicks, and other "general purpose" sources, as well as "specifically generated" content such as genomics, medical prescriptions, hospital records, etc.
Among the health-specific data, a large part is not specifically intended for health care use, such as administrative data, and many more data are gathered but not used for health care purposes.
For instance, most of the imaging data, laboratory records, genomic sequences, etc. are not used for diagnosis, as the diagnostic reports usually focus only on the specific findings useful for the diagnosis in that specific patient.
The present Special Issue invites papers which present studies on the use of these "alternative" sources of Big Data in Health to conduct clinical or epidemiological research.

Dr. Pierpaolo Cavallo
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

15 pages, 4934 KiB  
Article
Facing the National Recovery and Resilience Plan: Sources of Data, Indicators, and Participatory Strategies in Healthcare and Social Fields
by Michela Franchini, Sabrina Molinaro, Michelangelo Caiolfa, Massimiliano Salvatori and Stefania Pieroni
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(19), 10457; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph181910457 - 05 Oct 2021
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2028
Abstract
Innovation in governance and services should be the target of the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan. Monitoring processes, impacts, and outcomes requires a system of new indicators that are practical to collect. Secondary data sources, their availability, and their information potential should [...] Read more.
Innovation in governance and services should be the target of the Italian National Recovery and Resilience Plan. Monitoring processes, impacts, and outcomes requires a system of new indicators that are practical to collect. Secondary data sources, their availability, and their information potential should be evaluated, and primary sources should be implemented to supplement traditional disease surveillance. This work highlights the most relevant aspects for bridging the mismatching between complex community needs and current health/social supply and how those aspects could be faced. As a result, we propose a structured multi-phases process for setting the design and functionalities of a cooperative information system, built on the integration between secondary and primary data for informing policies about chronic low back pain (CLBP), a widely recognized determinant of disability and significant economic burden. In particular, we propose the Dress-KINESIS, a tool for improving community capacity development and participation that allows one to freely collect big health and social data and link it to existing secondary data. The system also may be able to monitor how the resources are distributed across different care sectors and suggest how to improve efficiency based on the patient’s CLBP risk stratification. Moreover, it is potentially customizable in other fields of health. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Using Alternative Sources of Big Data in Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 2198 KiB  
Article
Metabolic Syndromes as Important Comorbidities in Patients of Inherited Retinal Degenerations: Experiences from the Nationwide Health Database and a Large Hospital-Based Cohort
by Guann-Jye Chiou, Ding-Siang Huang, Fung-Rong Hu, Chung-May Yang, Chang-Hao Yang, Ching-Wen Huang, Jou-Wei Lin, Chao-Wen Lin, Tzyy-Chang Ho, Yi-Ting Hsieh, Tso-Ting Lai, Ho-Min Chen, Pei-Lung Chen, Chuhsing Kate Hsiao and Ta-Ching Chen
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(4), 2065; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph18042065 - 20 Feb 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2146
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the medical and socioeconomic impacts of IRDs using the nationwide health database and a large hospital-based cohort. This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study used data from the nationwide National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). All patients with IRD from [...] Read more.
This study aimed to evaluate the medical and socioeconomic impacts of IRDs using the nationwide health database and a large hospital-based cohort. This retrospective cross-sectional cohort study used data from the nationwide National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). All patients with IRD from January 2012 to December 2016 were selected from the NHIRD and matched with the general population at a ratio of 1:4. All variables, including comorbidities, medications, service utilization, and medical costs, within 1 year from the date of the IRD diagnosis, were analyzed. Disability data were retrieved from the Taiwan Inherited retinal degeneration Project (TIP), a medical center-based database. A total of 4447 and 17,788 subjects from the nationwide database were included in the IRD and control groups, respectively. The Charlson comorbidity index score was higher in the IRD group (0.74:0.52, p < 0.001). Yearly visits to the ophthalmology clinic were more frequent in the IRD group (6.80:1.06, p < 0.001), particularly to tertiary medical centers (p < 0.001). The IRD group showed greater odds ratios (OR) for metabolic syndrome-related comorbidities, including hypertension (OR = 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.10 to 1.26) and diabetes (OR = 1.32, 95% CI 1.21 to 1.45), and double the average yearly medical cost (2104.3 vs. 1084.6 USD, p < 0.001) and ten times the yearly ophthalmology cost (369.1 vs. 36.1 USD, p < 0.001). The average disability level was 54.17% for all subjects. This study revealed the large medical and socioeconomic impacts of IRD on not only patients with IRD, but also their family members and the whole society. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Using Alternative Sources of Big Data in Health)
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop