ijerph-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Evidence-Based Primary Prevention and Health Promotion: Effectiveness, Scalability, and Transfer

A special issue of International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health (ISSN 1660-4601). This special issue belongs to the section "Health Behavior, Chronic Disease and Health Promotion".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (28 February 2023) | Viewed by 9606

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology—BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Interests: social determinants of health; evidence-based prevention and health promotion; life course-related prevention

E-Mail Website
Assistant Guest Editor
Department of Prevention and Evaluation, Leibniz Institute for Prevention Research and Epidemiology—BIPS, 28359 Bremen, Germany
Interests: evidence synthesis; evidence-based efficacy of complementary treatments; promotion of physical activity in older age

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Strengthening the evidence base for primary prevention and health promotion has been a key issue in this research area in recent decades. Applying appropriate methods reflecting the complexity of such interventions is a core topic, but also, the adaptation of evidence from small scientific trials to real-world settings requires further attention. As more and more interventions show sufficient efficacy, it is important to learn more about effective implementation strategies, as well as the structures and resources needed for a successful scaling up of the interventions. At the same time, questions about equity implications in terms of differential access and effectiveness of the interventions across population groups arise, calling for context sensitivity and sociocultural adaptation. 

While participation and target group involvement have been at the very heart of health promotion for a long time, the topic has recently gained relevance in the field of knowledge transfer. Approaches like co-creation or so-called living labs aknowledge and value the active role of citizens in the process of knowledge production. The potential of these approaches, but also the challenges that may arise from the tension between practical knowledge and evidence-based practice, require more attention in the field of disease prevention and health promotion.

This Special Issue welcomes empirical studies (qualitative and/or quantitative), evidence syntheses and conceptual papers on the following topics:

  • Analyzing the effectiveness of preventive interventions in real-world settings;
  • Implemention strategies and sustainability of effective interventions;
  • Assessing the scalability of preventive interventions;
  • Sociocultural appropriateness and equity implications;
  • Innovative methods for interactive knowledge production and transfer.

Dr. Tilman Brand
Dr. Karina De Santis
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2500 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Primary prevention
  • Health promotion
  • Evidence
  • Effectiveness
  • Implementation
  • Scalability
  • Health inequalities
  • Knowledge transfer

Published Papers (3 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

10 pages, 452 KiB  
Article
Different Approaches to Appraising Systematic Reviews of Digital Interventions for Physical Activity Promotion Using AMSTAR 2 Tool: Cross-Sectional Study
by Karina Karolina De Santis and Katja Matthias
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20(6), 4689; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph20064689 - 07 Mar 2023
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1364
Abstract
High-quality systematic reviews (SRs) can strengthen the evidence base for prevention and health promotion. A 16-item AMSTAR 2 tool allows the appraisal of SRs by deriving a confidence rating in their results. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to assess and compare two [...] Read more.
High-quality systematic reviews (SRs) can strengthen the evidence base for prevention and health promotion. A 16-item AMSTAR 2 tool allows the appraisal of SRs by deriving a confidence rating in their results. In this cross-sectional study, we aimed to assess and compare two approaches to appraising 30 SRs of digital interventions for physical activity (PA) promotion using AMSTAR 2. Approach 1 (appraisals with 2/16 items) was used to identify SRs with critically low confidence ratings. Approach 2 (appraisals with all 16 items) was used (1) to derive the confidence ratings, (2) to identify SR strengths and weaknesses, and (3) to compare SR strengths among subgroups of SRs. The appraisal outcomes were summarized and compared using descriptive statistics. Approach 1 was quick (mean of 5 min/SR) at identifying SRs with critically low confidence ratings. Approach 2 was slower (mean of 20 min/SR), but allowed to identify SR strengths and weaknesses. Approach 2 showed that confidence ratings were low to critically low in 29/30 SRs. More strengths were identified in SRs with review protocols relative to SRs without review protocols and in newer SRs (published after AMSTAR 2 release) relative to older SRs. Only two items on AMSTAR 2 can quickly identify SRs with critical weaknesses. Although most SRs received low to critically low confidence ratings, SRs with review protocols and newer SRs tended to have more strengths. Future SRs require review protocols and better adherence to reporting guidelines to improve the confidence in their results. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 348 KiB  
Article
Twenty-One Reasons for Implementing the Act-Belong-Commit—‘ABCs of Mental Health’ Campaign
by Robert J. Donovan, Vibeke J. Koushede, Catherine F. Drane, Carsten Hinrichsen, Julia Anwar-McHenry, Line Nielsen, Amberlee Nicholas, Charlotte Meilstrup and Ziggi Ivan Santini
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2021, 18(21), 11095; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph182111095 - 21 Oct 2021
Cited by 15 | Viewed by 4107
Abstract
While there has been increased attention worldwide on mental health promotion over the past two decades, what is lacking in many countries around the globe is practical knowledge of what constitutes a population-wide mental health promotion campaign, and how such a campaign can [...] Read more.
While there has been increased attention worldwide on mental health promotion over the past two decades, what is lacking in many countries around the globe is practical knowledge of what constitutes a population-wide mental health promotion campaign, and how such a campaign can be implemented. This paper provides such knowledge based on the development, implementation and evaluation of the Act-Belong-Commit campaign, the world’s first comprehensive population-wide public mental health promotion campaign which was launched in 2008 in Western Australia. Given the learnings from the full-scale implementation and evaluation of the campaign in Western Australia and its expansion nationally and internationally, along with the continuing and expanding evidence base for the campaign constructs, we crystallise 21 reasons why jurisdictions who wish to achieve the goals of the WHO and adopt the recommendations of the European framework on mental health and wellbeing should consider adopting or adapting Act-Belong-Commit when considering implementing a public mental health promotion campaign. Full article

Review

Jump to: Research

17 pages, 2106 KiB  
Review
Development of a Framework for Scaling Up Community-Based Health Promotion: A Best Fit Framework Synthesis
by Philipp Weber, Leonie Birkholz, Simone Kohler, Natalie Helsper, Lea Dippon, Alfred Ruetten, Klaus Pfeifer and Jana Semrau
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2022, 19(8), 4773; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/ijerph19084773 - 14 Apr 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2760
Abstract
Community-based health promotion with a focus on people with social disadvantages is essential to address persistently existing health inequities. However, achieving an impact on public health requires scaling up such approaches beyond manifold funded pilot projects. The aim of this qualitative review is [...] Read more.
Community-based health promotion with a focus on people with social disadvantages is essential to address persistently existing health inequities. However, achieving an impact on public health requires scaling up such approaches beyond manifold funded pilot projects. The aim of this qualitative review is to provide an overview of scaling-up frameworks in health promotion and to identify key components for scaling up community-based health promotion. First, we conducted a systematic search for scaling-up frameworks for health promotion in PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycInfo, and SportDiscus. Based on the included frameworks, we created an a priori framework. Second, we searched for primary research studies in the same databases that reported scaling-up processes of community-based health promotion. We coded the data using the a priori framework. From 80 articles, a total of 12 frameworks were eligible, and 5 were included for data extraction. The analysis yielded 10 a priori defined key components: “innovation characteristics”; “clarify and coordinate roles and responsibilities”; “build up skills, knowledge, and capacity”; “mobilize and sustain resources”; “initiate and maintain regular communication”; “plan, conduct, and apply assessment, monitoring, and evaluation”; “develop political commitment and advocacy”; “build and foster collaboration”; “encourage participation and ownership”; and “plan and follow strategic approaches”. We further identified 113 primary research studies; 10 were eligible. No new key components were found, but all a priori defined key components were supported by the studies. Ten key components for scaling up community-based health promotion represent the final framework. We further identified “encourage participation and ownership” as a crucial component regarding health equity. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop