Recent Advances in the Treatment of ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction

A special issue of Journal of Clinical Medicine (ISSN 2077-0383). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 20 August 2024 | Viewed by 3089

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
1. Cardiology Intensive Care Unit and Interventional Cardiology, Hôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque, Pessac, France
2. Bordeaux Cardio-Thoracic Research Centre, U1045, Bordeaux University, Hôpital Xavier Arnozan, Pessac, France
Interests: acute coronary syndrome; interventional cardiology; percutaneous coronary intervention; intravascular ultrasound; optical coherence tomography; cardiac magnetic resonance imaging

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The incidence of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in European countries ranges between 40 and 140/100 000/year, which equates to over 500,000 patients with STEMI being admitted to hospital each year. Despite improvements in management, STEMI remains one of the leading causes of death in Europe, as well as globally. The gold standard of treatment of STEMI is acute reperfusion therapy, preferably with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Further efforts should made to improve the quality of care for STEMI patients. Continuous public awareness campaigns should be performed to develop understanding of the condition and reduce the interval between the onset of symptoms and first medical contact; improvements of logistics should be implemented to minimize delays so as to increase the number of patients treated with primary PCI within 120 min, or preferably, 60 min after first medical contact. Future research is needed to reduce mortality in patients with cardiogenic shock or in patients presenting with STEMI and following events of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

The present Special Issue aims to overview the current knowledge, latest evidence, and unresolved issues regarding the treatment of STEMI. Therefore, I welcome the submission of innovative, original research papers and in-depth review articles dealing with pioneering management and/or treatment techniques of STEMI.

Dr. Édouard Gerbaud
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Journal of Clinical Medicine is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction
  • pre-hospital treatment
  • primary percutaneous coronary intervention
  • interventional cardiology
  • cardiovascular mortality

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

14 pages, 1343 KiB  
Article
Age-Related Effects of COVID-19 Pandemic on Mechanical Reperfusion and 30-Day Mortality for STEMI: Results of the ISACS-STEMI COVID-19 Registry
by Giuseppe De Luca, Magdy Algowhary, Berat Uguz, Dinaldo C. Oliveira, Vladimir Ganyukov, Oliver Busljetik, Miha Cercek, Lisette Okkels Jensen, Poay Huan Loh, Lucian Calmac, Gerard Roura i Ferrer, Alexandre Quadros, Marek Milewski, Fortunato Scotto D’Uccio, Clemens von Birgelen, Francesco Versaci, Jurrien Ten Berg, Gianni Casella, Aaron Wong Sung Lung, Petr Kala, José Luis Díez Gil, Xavier Carrillo, Maurits Dirksen, Victor Becerra Munoz, Michael Kang-yin Lee, Dafsah Arifa Juzar, Rodrigo de Moura Joaquim, Roberto Paladino, Davor Milicic, Periklis Davlouros, Nikola Bakraceski, Filippo Zilio, Luca Donazzan, Adriaan Kraaijeveld, Gennaro Galasso, Lux Arpad, Lucia Marinucci, Vincenzo Guiducci, Maurizio Menichelli, Alessandra Scoccia, Aylin Hatice Yamac, Kadir Ugur Mert, Xacobe Flores Rios, Tomas Kovarnik, Michal Kidawa, Josè Moreu, Vincent Flavien, Enrico Fabris, Iñigo Lozano Martínez-Luengas, Marco Boccalatte, Francisco Bosa Ojeda, Carlos Arellano-Serrano, Gianluca Caiazzo, Giuseppe Cirrincione, Hsien-Li Kao, Juan Sanchis Forés, Luigi Vignali, Helder Pereira, Stephane Manzo-Silberman, Santiago Ordoñez, Alev Arat Özkan, Bruno Scheller, Heidi Lehitola, Rui Teles, Christos Mantis, Ylitalo Antti, João António Brum Silveira, Cesar Rodrigo Zoni, Ivan Bessonov, Giuseppe Uccello, George Kochiadakis, Dimitrios Alexopulos, Carlos E. Uribe, John Kanakakis, Benjamin Faurie, Gabriele Gabrielli, Alejandro Gutierrez Barrios, Juan Pablo Bachini, Alex Rocha, Frankie C. C. Tam, Alfredo Rodriguez, Antonia Anna Lukito, Veauthyelau Saint-Joy, Gustavo Pessah, Andrea Tuccillo, Alfonso Ielasi, Giuliana Cortese, Guido Parodi, Mohammed Abed Burgadha, Elvin Kedhi, Pablo Lamelas, Harry Suryapranata, Matteo Nardin and Monica Verdoiaadd Show full author list remove Hide full author list
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(6), 2116; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12062116 - 08 Mar 2023
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1481
Abstract
Background: The constraints in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been suggested to have severely impacted mortality levels. The aim of the current analysis is to evaluate the age-related effects of the COVID-19 pandemic [...] Read more.
Background: The constraints in the management of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) during the COVID-19 pandemic have been suggested to have severely impacted mortality levels. The aim of the current analysis is to evaluate the age-related effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on mechanical reperfusion and 30-day mortality for STEMI within the registry ISACS-STEMI COVID-19. Methods: This retrospective multicenter registry was performed in high-volume PPCI centers on four continents and included STEMI patients undergoing PPCI in March–June 2019 and 2020. Patients were divided according to age (< or ≥75 years). The main outcomes were the incidence and timing of PPCI, (ischemia time longer than 12 h and door-to-balloon longer than 30 min), and in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Results: We included 16,683 patients undergoing PPCI in 109 centers. In 2020, during the pandemic, there was a significant reduction in PPCI as compared to 2019 (IRR 0.843 (95%-CI: 0.825–0.861, p < 0.0001). We found a significant age-related reduction (7%, p = 0.015), with a larger effect on elderly than on younger patients. Furthermore, we observed significantly higher 30-day mortality during the pandemic period, especially among the elderly (13.6% vs. 17.9%, adjusted HR (95% CI) = 1.55 [1.24–1.93], p < 0.001) as compared to younger patients (4.8% vs. 5.7%; adjusted HR (95% CI) = 1.25 [1.05–1.49], p = 0.013), as a potential consequence of the significantly longer ischemia time observed during the pandemic. Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on the treatment of patients with STEMI, with a 16% reduction in PPCI procedures, with a larger reduction and a longer delay to treatment among elderly patients, which may have contributed to increase in-hospital and 30-day mortality during the pandemic. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

19 pages, 4290 KiB  
Systematic Review
Five-Year Efficacy and Safety of TiNO-Coated Stents Versus Drug-Eluting Stents in Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Meta-Analysis
by Frederic C. Daoud, Bogdan Catargi, Pasi P. Karjalainen and Edouard Gerbaud
J. Clin. Med. 2023, 12(21), 6952; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/jcm12216952 - 06 Nov 2023
Viewed by 1028
Abstract
(1) Background: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are performed with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents (TiNOSs) or drug-eluting stents (DESs). The initial completion of this prospective systematic literature review (SLR) of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that TiNOSs are [...] Read more.
(1) Background: Percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are performed with titanium-nitride-oxide-coated stents (TiNOSs) or drug-eluting stents (DESs). The initial completion of this prospective systematic literature review (SLR) of prospective randomized controlled trials (RCTs) showed that TiNOSs are non-inferior to DESs in major adverse cardiac event (MACE) rates and present a lower risk of recurrent myocardial infarction (MI) at 1-year follow-up. This iteration of the SLR protocol performs the critical assessment of 5-year follow-up outcomes with clinical validity and generalizability assessments. (2) Methods: The previously described SLR and meta-analysis protocol, per PRISMA, Cochrane methods, and GRADE, was applied to 5-year follow-up outcomes. (3) Results: Three RCTs were eligible, comprising 1620 patients with TiNOS vs. 1123 with DES. The pooled risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals were MACE 0.82 [0.68, 0.99], MI 0.58 [0.44, 0.78], cardiac death (CD) 0.46 [0.28, 0.76], ischemia-driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) 1.03 [0.79, 1.33], probable or definite stent thrombosis (ST) 0.32 [0.21, 0.59], and all-cause mortality (TD) 0.84 [0.63, 1.12]. The evidence certainty was high in MACE, CD, MI, and ST, and moderate in TLR and TD. (4) Conclusions: TiNOSs in ACS at 5-year follow-up appear safer than DESs and equally efficacious. The pooled RRs stratified by clinical presentation and stent type will be required to test this meta-analysis’s clinical validity and generalize its results to patient populations with varying proportions of clinical presentations and DES options. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop