The Past and the Present of Food Sustainability and Resilience of Local Food Production

A special issue of Land (ISSN 2073-445X). This special issue belongs to the section "Land Socio-Economic and Political Issues".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: 30 April 2024 | Viewed by 10547

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Social Anthropology, University of Bern, 3012 Bern, Switzerland
Interests: land grabbing; agricultural investment; dispossession

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Institute of Social Anthropology, University of Bern, Lerchenweg 36, 3000 Bern 9, Switzerland
Interests: environmental perceptions; large-scale land acquisitions; gender and resource management; climate change; bottom-up institution building processes (constitutionality)
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Genetics and Evolution, University of Geneva, 1205 Geneva, Switzerland
Interests: archaeobotany

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

This Special Issue contributes to the topic/debate of the interlinkages between past and present food production systems with a special focus on how this impacts food sustainability and resilience of local food production. It is of interest to see how current food production systems are related to pre-colonial ones, what the factors of reduction or increase in food diversity and sustainability are, as well as what the impacts of these changes on wellbeing and health, and economic and social relations such as labor and gender are. Thus, contributions from different disciplines such as social anthropology, public health and epidemiology, archaeology, etc. are welcome. We are interested in seeing how local ecological knowledge of food production systems in contemporary situations can still be enhanced and how different local actors engage in such a situation.

We argue that while in the beginning of colonialization, new foods increased diversity, this changes with the urban and market-oriented agro-industrial food production, which lowers diversity. Furthermore, these changes in dietary pattern are reflected in nutritional outcomes and are paralleled by major changes in health status that can be both positive and negative. Strategies to upkeep diversity and lower vulnerability have been reduced by institutional transformations from common property to private and state property and open access of natural resources. This undermines the seasonal and cyclical production and accessibility of food in rural areas and might also negatively affect resilience and sustainability of local food production, especially under situations of local political, economic, and climate crises.

From a social–anthropological, new institutionalist, political ecology, and food systems theory perspective, which focus on regulatory aspects, relative prices and power relations, as well as discourse, narratives, and ideologies, this Special Issue calls for contributions analyzing changes in institutions for natural resources (such as agricultural land, water, wildlife, fish, plants, non-timber forest and veldt products, etc.) that provide the base of local food production systems and the impact on food sustainability. It also welcomes contributions that look at local perceptions and local traditional ecological knowledge as well as at changes in food security policies and their impacts on local food sustainability. This relates to contributions that show how agro-industrial transformation and agricultural investments (privatization) change local food production systems and food practices and preferences and other local dynamics such as power relations (gender, inter-ethnic relations etc.).

Another focus of interest is food insecurity, shifts in food availability, and access linked to different food systems and how local people use/activate/revitalize local traditional knowledge on foods/food production variation/conservation/storage (hunger foods, etc.) or invent/introduce new practices to cope with this situation and upkeep resilience and fight malnutrition.

Over the past two decades, the pace of dietary change appears to have accelerated in different regions of the world, such as a shift in consumption of basic staples toward more diversified diets. Today, a marked worldwide shift from traditional food regimes to a diet that is high in fat, sugar, processed foods, and low in fiber with corresponding increases in degenerative diseases is evident. From an epidemiological perspective, diet and nutritional status have undergone shifts in the broad patterns of food use, which has resulted in changes in stature, body composition, and patterns of disease. Thus, we welcome contributions on how changes in food consumption pattern and preferences has contributed to health status as food insecurity is associated with poorer health profiles including overweight, and obesity which are increasingly recognized as forms of malnutrition.

It also welcomes archaeological research reconstructing the history of agricultural and food practices in pre-historical and pre-colonial times and how variability, and possibly sustainability, have changed over time and influenced by post-colonial policies. This includes looking at how this is affecting local peoples’ use of different natural resources, such as plant uses. Have people switched to the collection of wild resources, are they using a diversified agricultural system of domesticated plants, or both? Related to this are attempts to understand how these changes and transformations could be tracked back to the past and how we could use the present to understand the past. By doing so, our understanding of past botanical remains by comparison through participation in daily activities of local people who still use “traditional” methods such as crop-processing and cooking practices can be improved. Hence, our understanding of archaeobotanical assemblages and archaeology of food is enhanced through careful observations of modern processes which create such assemblages that we may find archaeologically.

Dr. Désirée Gmür
Prof. Dr. Tobias Haller
Dr. Louis Champion
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Land is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2600 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • food sustainability
  • food resilience
  • food systems
  • food security
  • food consumption
  • food security state policies
  • global dynamics of food production
  • malnutrition
  • natural resource management systems and food security
  • institutional changes and food sustainability
  • landscape evolution
  • agro-industrial transformations
  • sustainable diets
  • local foods
  • archaeology of food
  • archaeobotany

Published Papers (5 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

19 pages, 4186 KiB  
Article
How Does Land Fragmentation Affect Agricultural Technical Efficiency? Based on Mediation Effects Analysis
by Chunfang Zhou, Yuluan Zhao, Mingshun Long and Xiubin Li
Land 2024, 13(3), 284; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/land13030284 - 25 Feb 2024
Viewed by 894
Abstract
The scientific revelation of the mechanism underlying land fragmentation’s influence on agricultural technical efficiency is extremely important. This study utilized survey data from 305 villages across 12 provinces in Southern China in 2020 to assess technical efficiency through the application of the stochastic [...] Read more.
The scientific revelation of the mechanism underlying land fragmentation’s influence on agricultural technical efficiency is extremely important. This study utilized survey data from 305 villages across 12 provinces in Southern China in 2020 to assess technical efficiency through the application of the stochastic frontier production function. Moreover, we investigated the direct impact of land fragmentation on technical efficiency and the indirect impact transmitted through crop diversification and part-time farming by employing Tobit and mediating effect models, respectively. The key findings are as follows: (1) The sampled farmers, on average, operated 0.614 hectares of land with 17.395 plots, and the mean of their technical efficiency was 0.630. (2) The overall effect of land fragmentation on technical efficiency demonstrated a “U”-shaped relationship. (3) Crop diversification and part-time farming were mediating factors in the impact of land fragmentation on technical efficiency. Specifically, an “inverted U”-shaped relationship existed between land fragmentation and crop diversification, whereas a negative linear relationship was observed between land fragmentation and part-time farming. Conversely, crop diversification presented a positive linear relationship with technical efficiency, and part-time farming had an “inverted U”-shaped relationship with technical efficiency. (4) The impact of land fragmentation on technical efficiency varied across altitude zones. It is recommended to control land fragmentation based on local conditions, encourage crop diversification, and strengthen employment guidance and skills training for farmers to ensure the orderly transfer of land. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 286 KiB  
Article
Interwoven Landscapes: Gender and Land in the Kafue Flats, Zambia
by Sonja Merten and Tobias Haller
Land 2023, 12(9), 1657; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/land12091657 - 24 Aug 2023
Viewed by 626
Abstract
This paper examines changes in formal and informal land access rules for women in the Kafue Flats of southern Zambia and identifies alternatives to land privatization. In rural African communities dependent on subsistence production, access to common pool resources (CPRs) such as fisheries, [...] Read more.
This paper examines changes in formal and informal land access rules for women in the Kafue Flats of southern Zambia and identifies alternatives to land privatization. In rural African communities dependent on subsistence production, access to common pool resources (CPRs) such as fisheries, wildlife or wild fruits made an important contribution to household food and nutritional security. In the pre-colonial period, the use of agricultural land and associated CPRs was governed by local institutions of common property, characterized by more-than-human relationships embedded in the local animistic ontology. To examine how women’s pre-colonial access rights were increasingly disregarded in the wake of new statutory laws, we analyzed qualitative ethnographic data on livelihoods and food security from three time periods between 2002 and 2018. The findings show how customary law land tenure has remained important, despite being complemented by statutory law designed to also protect women’s property rights. We conclude that women’s customary access rights to land and CPRs must be taken into account in the drafting of formal legislation, as suggested by successful examples of bottom-up institution building in other regions. Full article
17 pages, 2900 KiB  
Article
Food Security from the Forest: The Case of the Commodification of Baobab Fruit (Adansonia digitata L.) in Boundou Region, Senegal
by Babatunde Owolodun and Sonja Merten
Land 2023, 12(7), 1423; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/land12071423 - 16 Jul 2023
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1380
Abstract
Wild edible fruits from the forest have often been regarded as poverty food; however, there has been a notable shift in recent years as these wild edible fruits have gained increasing recognition for their significance in global food security, especially in agricultural societies [...] Read more.
Wild edible fruits from the forest have often been regarded as poverty food; however, there has been a notable shift in recent years as these wild edible fruits have gained increasing recognition for their significance in global food security, especially in agricultural societies such as Senegal. This paper contributes to the debate on how the forest plays a role in diets and nutrition security using the example of wild fruit (Baobab) found in the Boundou Region in Senegal. The livelihood strategies of people in this region have been subject to external influences, such as climate shock and restrictions enforced as the area became a protected area in 2009. These external influences have resulted in the loss of pasture use and the prohibition of hunting. Restriction of access to these previous commons (pasture, wildlife) diminishes the resilience of the local population. However, a new alternative of seasonal usage of wild fruit, specifically baobab, for commercial purposes has emerged as everybody in the community has unrestricted access to collecting these wild edible fruits within the protected area, which is uncommon in other protected areas. The commodification and commercialization of these wild fruits bring essential cash income to many households, thereby improving food security. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 1887 KiB  
Article
Green Agendas and White Markets: The Coloniality of Agroecology in Senegal
by Franziska Marfurt, Tobias Haller and Patrick Bottazzi
Land 2023, 12(7), 1324; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/land12071324 - 30 Jun 2023
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1345
Abstract
Development actors in West Africa have been promoting agroecological farming as a solution to combat climate change and to create more sovereign food systems that enhance the autonomy of local smallholders. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence regarding the actual implementation [...] Read more.
Development actors in West Africa have been promoting agroecological farming as a solution to combat climate change and to create more sovereign food systems that enhance the autonomy of local smallholders. However, there is a lack of empirical evidence regarding the actual implementation of such programs and their potential to empower smallholders, especially in the West African region. Drawing on co-produced knowledge from anthropological fieldwork in Western Senegal, the case study of an alternative food network explores the interlinkages between the promotion of agroecology, anti-migration policies, and unequal power and market relations. Informed by decolonial political ecologies, the analysis reveals different layers of coloniality which complicate embodied effects on horticultural smallholders. The authors conclude that instead of fostering the emancipation of smallholders, development actors promote a labor-intensive and unprofitable way of farming that exploits local resources for the sake of green agendas and white markets. This article highlights the need for a critical reflection on the potential limitations of agroecology and calls for a more nuanced approach that considers the complex realities of smallholders in West Africa. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

14 pages, 686 KiB  
Review
Multidimensional Food Security Nexus in Drylands under the Slow Onset Effects of Climate Change
by Ilan Stavi, Anastasia Paschalidou, Apostolos P. Kyriazopoulos, Rares Halbac-Cotoara-Zamfir, Si Mokrane Siad, Malgorzata Suska-Malawska, Dragisa Savic, Joana Roque de Pinho, Lisa Thalheimer, David Samuel Williams, Nurit Hashimshony-Yaffe, Kees van der Geest, Claudia M. d. S. Cordovil and Andrej Ficko
Land 2021, 10(12), 1350; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/land10121350 - 07 Dec 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 5156
Abstract
Hyperarid, arid, semiarid, and dry subhumid areas cover approximately 41% of the global land area. The human population in drylands, currently estimated at 2.7 billion, faces limited access to sufficient, affordable, and nutritious food. We discuss the interlinkages among water security, environmental security, [...] Read more.
Hyperarid, arid, semiarid, and dry subhumid areas cover approximately 41% of the global land area. The human population in drylands, currently estimated at 2.7 billion, faces limited access to sufficient, affordable, and nutritious food. We discuss the interlinkages among water security, environmental security, energy security, economic security, health security, and food security governance, and how they affect food security in drylands. Reliable and adequate water supply, and the prevention of water contamination, increase the potential for ample food, fodder, and fiber production. Protecting woodlands and rangelands increases food security by buffering the slow onset effects of climate change, including biodiversity loss, desertification, salinization, and land degradation. The protection of natural lands is expected to decrease environmental contamination, and simultaneously, reduce the transfer of diseases from wildlife to humans. Biofuel production and hydroelectric power plants increase energy security but generate land-use conflicts, deforestation, and ecosystem degradation. Economic security generally positively correlates with food security. However, economic growth often degrades the environment, changes tenure rights over natural resources, and stimulates migration to urban areas, resulting in lower food and health security. Moreover, civil unrest, political instability, and armed conflicts disrupt local economies in drylands. Maintaining food security is crucial for health security; conversely, malnourished populations and unresponsive health systems decrease economic security, and adversely affect environmental, energy, and food security. Climate change is expected to deteriorate health security by spreading vector-borne diseases. Effective governance and timely interventions can substantially shorten periods of food insecurity, lower their intensities, and accelerate recovery from inevitable crises, and are therefore crucial in preventing humanitarian crises. Since global drylands population will nearly double by 2050, and since drylands are among the most susceptible areas to climate change, integrated multi-hazard approaches to food security are needed. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop