Cardiac Rehabilitation in Patients With Heart Failure: New Perspectives in Exercise Training

A special issue of Medicina (ISSN 1648-9144). This special issue belongs to the section "Cardiology".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 March 2021) | Viewed by 7208

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Movement, Sport and Health Sciences (M2S) Laboratory, University of Rennes 2, 35043 Rennes, France
Interests: sport sciences & health; exercise physiology; sport performances; sport rehabilitation
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Sport’s Medicine Department, Pontchaillou Hospital, Rennes1 University, 35000 Rennes, France
Interests: sport cardiology; cardiac rehabilitation; athlete’s heart; physical inactivity and sedentary behavior

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Integrated Institute of Health, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul—UFMS, Campo Grande 79070-900, MS, Brazil
Interests: sports science; exercise performance; exercise physiology; sport physiology; exercise science; strength and conditioning; exercise testing; athletic performance; muscle physiology; sport biomechanics
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues, 

Heart failure (HF) is a distressing condition and is a leading cause of morbidity, affecting ~2% of the adult population in industrialized countries. HF can be defined as ‘a complex clinical syndrome with typical symptoms (e.g., dyspnea, fatigue) that can occur at rest or during effort’. Moreover, HF is characterized by objective evidence of an underlying structural abnormality or cardiac dysfunction that impairs the ability of the ventricle to fill with or eject blood. During exercise, these symptoms are more evident. Historically, patients with HF were excluded from exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation programs. In fact, it was thought that exercise might cause decompensation in an already weakened heart. In recent years, new evidence has suggested that exercise-based rehabilitation programs have beneficial effects for patients with HF, and thus, supervised exercise programs are routinely recommended for all HF patients as a fundamental part of their non-pharmacological management, as they are considered safe and to also reduce HF-related hospitalization, co-morbidities, and mortality rates in these patients. Moreover, exercise-based rehabilitation is known to improve quality of life and functional capacity for these patients. Evidence for the benefits of cardiac rehabilitation in heart failure patients is such that its systematic realization is recommended by international cardiologic societies with the higher level of evidence (I A). Despite this, few patients with heart failure currently benefit from this rehabilitation (less than 15%). However, there is still debate with regard to the optimal exercise regimen, the duration of the overall benefit, and whether certain types of HF etiologies or clinical stages (e.g., before or after valve surgery) are more beneficial. This heterogeneity, along with the small sample sizes used for most studies, make it very difficult to achieve solid conclusions and recommendations. Consequently, further research is warranted to assess the efficacy of different exercise training methods in HF patients, while also looking at novel ways to improve their adherence in exercise programs.

Prof. Hassane Zouhal
Prof. François Carré
Dr. Daniel A. Boullosa
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Medicina is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Cardiac rehabilitation
  • Cardiovascular disease
  • Exercise
  • Functional evaluation
  • Heart failure
  • Clinical outcomes
  • Physical training
  • Cardiorespiratory fitness
  • Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction
  • Aerobic exercise
  • Resistance exercise
  • Concurrent training
  • Quality of life.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

9 pages, 316 KiB  
Article
Cardiac Rehabilitation and Complementary Physical Training in Elderly Patients after Acute Coronary Syndrome: A Pilot Study
by Aurelija Beigienė, Daiva Petruševičienė, Vitalija Barasaitė, Raimondas Kubilius and Jūratė Macijauskienė
Medicina 2021, 57(6), 529; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina57060529 - 25 May 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3681
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Nearly 23% of elderly patients hospitalized due to acute coronary syndrome have reduced muscle strength. It is assumed that these patients would better benefit from a complex training—a combination of endurance, strength, balance, coordination, and flexibility—in order to reduce [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Nearly 23% of elderly patients hospitalized due to acute coronary syndrome have reduced muscle strength. It is assumed that these patients would better benefit from a complex training—a combination of endurance, strength, balance, coordination, and flexibility—in order to reduce the loss of muscle strength and mass and improve functional capacity. The aim of this study was to assess the effectiveness and safety of two different complementary resistance and balance training programs during short-term cardiac rehabilitation (CR) in elderly patients after a percutaneous or surgical intervention due to acute coronary syndrome. Materials and Methods: This randomized controlled trial was conducted from January 2020 to February 2021 in one Lithuanian rehabilitation hospital. A total of 63 participants who met the inclusion criteria were randomly assigned to three groups (at the ratio of 1:1:1): control (CG, n = 19), intervention 1 (IG-1, n = 26), and intervention 2 (IG-2, n = 18). All the patients attended a usual inpatient CR program of a mean duration of 18.7 ± 1.7 days, while the patients assigned to the intervention groups (IG-1 and IG-2) additionally received different resistance and balance training programs three days a week. Functional capacity, with 6-minute walk test (6MWT) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), as well as physical performance, with the short physical performance battery (SPPB) test and one repetition maximum test (1RM) for leg press, were assessed at baseline and after CR. Results: The mean age of the participants was 72.9 ± 5.5 years; 73% were men. All parameters of functional capacity and physical performance improved significantly after CR (p < 0.05), except for peak VO2 that improved only in the IG-1. Comparison of CR effectiveness among the groups revealed no significant differences. Conclusions: All three rehabilitation programs were safe and well tolerated by elderly patients aged ≥65 years as well as improved functional capacity (6-minute walk distance and peak workload) and physical performance (SPPB and 1RM). Complementary resistance and balance training with traditional physical therapy means and exercises with mechanical devices did not show greater benefits for the results of physical performance compared with the usual CR program. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Other

Jump to: Research

6 pages, 653 KiB  
Brief Report
Lower Cardiovascular Stress during Resistance Training Performed with Inter-Repetition Rests in Elderly Coronary Patients
by Olga Ribeiro-Torres, Arilson Fernandes M. de Sousa, Eliseo Iglesias-Soler, Maelán Fontes-Villalba, Hassane Zouhal, François Carré, Carl Foster and Daniel Boullosa
Medicina 2020, 56(6), 264; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/medicina56060264 - 28 May 2020
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 2834
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Hemodynamic stress during resistance training is often a reason why this training method is not used in cardiac patients. A lifting protocol that imposes rests between repetitions (IRRT) may provide less hemodynamic stress compared to traditional resistance training (TT). The [...] Read more.
Background and Objectives: Hemodynamic stress during resistance training is often a reason why this training method is not used in cardiac patients. A lifting protocol that imposes rests between repetitions (IRRT) may provide less hemodynamic stress compared to traditional resistance training (TT). The aim of this study was to verify differences between set configurations on hemodynamic stress responses in resistance training. Materials and Methods: We compared hemodynamic (heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), and rate pressure product (RPP)) responses assessed with the auscultatory method in elderly (age = 75.3 ± 7.3 years) coronary male patients who were participating in a cardiac rehabilitation program allocated to either TT or IRRT with the same load (kg) and total number of repetitions (24) in the bilateral leg extension exercise. Results: IRRT resulted in significant lower values than TT for RPP at repetitions 8 (p = 0.024; G = 0.329; 95% CI: 0.061, 0.598) and 16 (p = 0.014; G = 0.483; 95% CI: 0.112, 0.854). Conclusions: IRRT appears to be a viable method of reducing the hemodynamic response (i.e., RPP) to resistance training and, thus, may contribute to the safety of cardiac rehabilitation programs. Further studies with more cardiac patients and other measurement techniques should be conducted to confirm these important findings. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop