Advanced Technologies in Coal Flotation and Utilization of Coal Solid Waste Resources

A special issue of Minerals (ISSN 2075-163X). This special issue belongs to the section "Mineral Processing and Extractive Metallurgy".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 July 2022) | Viewed by 3801

Special Issue Editor

Chinese National Engineering Research Center of Coal Preparation and Purification, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116, China
Interests: low-quality coal flotation; resource utilization of coal series solid wastes; environmental mineralogy

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Coal plays an increasingly important role in global energy supply and chemical production, and its separation and recovery from ores is increasingly necessary. With the consumption of high-quality coal resources, their large scale separation from low-quality coal has become a strategic choice to ensure energy security and the high quality, green development of the coal industry. Flotation, which takes advantage of the differences in the physical and chemical properties of particle surfaces, is an efficient and economical technique for recovering fine-grained low-quality coal slime. The difficult-to-float and difficult-to-separate mechanism of low-quality coal, the interface regulation, and the fluid intensification of low-quality coal flotation are three hot point scientific questions in the area of low-quality coal flotation. Further, the new principle of low-quality coal flotation separation based on multi-scale micro–nano force analysis, the intelligent directional screening design of flotation reagent molecules based on a single molecule force spectrum combined with deep learning, the refining of the construction of pulp mixing and flotation flow field based on accurate energy adaptation, and the resourceful utilization of coal series solid wastes encompass future research directions in low quality coal flotation processes and technology systems.

Dr. Xiahui Gui
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Minerals is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2400 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • flotation, flotation reagent, flotation chemistry
  • environment, recycling
  • interface regulation
  • fluid intensification
  • resource utilization of solid wastes.

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

22 pages, 11365 KiB  
Article
Seismic Response Models and the AVO Simulation of Coal-Bearing Reservoirs
by Yijun Xi and Xingyao Yin
Minerals 2022, 12(7), 836; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min12070836 - 29 Jun 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1725
Abstract
The presence of coal in complex structures featuring sandstone reservoirs seriously hinders reservoir characterization and the identification of fluids in subsurface formations. Coal can strongly obscure the reflections from sandstone, easily leading to false bright spots during exploration; thus, reservoirs and their boundaries [...] Read more.
The presence of coal in complex structures featuring sandstone reservoirs seriously hinders reservoir characterization and the identification of fluids in subsurface formations. Coal can strongly obscure the reflections from sandstone, easily leading to false bright spots during exploration; thus, reservoirs and their boundaries cannot be accurately described. Furthermore, sandstone layers intercalated with thin coal seams form complex composite reflections. Therefore, considering the complexity of coal-bearing reservoirs together with the geological evolution of coal and actual logging data, this study systematically analyses the seismic reflections of coal-bearing reservoirs. First, the seismic responses of various coal-bearing reservoir models are established by evaluating multiple well logs of the target layer. Then, by forward-simulating theoretical seismic data, seismic response models comprising different lithological combinations are established. Finally, seismic attributes (such as the amplitude, frequency and phase) of coal-bearing and non-coal-bearing strata are compared, and the seismic responses of typical lithological combinations of coal-bearing reservoirs are summarized. A single-well model test and a comparison between synthetic and seismic data confirm that numerical simulations can be used to forward model the seismic response characteristics of different sand–coal models, thereby eliminating the influences of coal and accurately characterizing sandstone reservoirs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 10322 KiB  
Article
Effects of Coal Rank and Macerals on the Structure Characteristics of Coal-Based Graphene Materials from Anthracite in Qinshui Coalfield
by Ruiqing Li, Yuegang Tang, Qili Che, Pengliang Ma, Peng Luo, Xin Lu and Min Dong
Minerals 2022, 12(5), 588; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/min12050588 - 06 May 2022
Cited by 7 | Viewed by 1586
Abstract
Thirteen raw coal samples from Qinshui coalfield were prepared to produce coal-based graphene, and the raw coal, coal-based graphite, and coal-based graphene sheets (GS) were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS), and high-resolution transmission [...] Read more.
Thirteen raw coal samples from Qinshui coalfield were prepared to produce coal-based graphene, and the raw coal, coal-based graphite, and coal-based graphene sheets (GS) were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), Raman spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy with energy dispersive spectrometer (SEM-EDS), and high-resolution transmission electron microscopy (HRTEM). The results show that the graphitization degree of coal-based graphite is positively linearly correlated with the reflectance of raw coal, has a low positive correlation with the content of inertinite, and has a low positive correlation with the content of vitrinite in raw coal. The crystallite width (La) and crystallite height (Lc) of coal-based graphite and graphene are positively linearly correlated with the reflectance of raw coal. La and Lc of coal-based graphite are distributed in 17.591–48.374 nm and 11.359–23.023 nm, respectively. After redox, La and Lc of coal-based graphene are distributed in 4.405 nm–6.243 nm and 0.804–1.144 nm, respectively. The defect degree (ID/IG) of coal-based graphene is higher than that of raw coal, demineralized coal, and coal-based graphite. The coal-based graphene is thin and transparent, and only contained carbon and oxygen. Combined with the parameters of XRD and HRTEM, it is calculated that the interlayer spacing (d002) of Qinshui-coal-based graphene is about 0.4007 nm and the number of layers (Nave) is about 5. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop