molecules-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

New Breakthroughs in GPCR Structure, Function and Their Impact on Drug Discovery

A special issue of Molecules (ISSN 1420-3049). This special issue belongs to the section "Medicinal Chemistry".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2020) | Viewed by 32533

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Chemistry, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
Interests: G-protein coupled receptors; protein folding; metallothioneins; repeat proteins

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

G-protein coupled receptors are involved in binding a very large number of pharmacologically relevant drugs. Accordingly, much interest in understanding their structure has led to an ever-accelerating rate of new structures being determined. The first structure of a GPCR, bovine rhodopsin, was published by the Palczewski lab in 2000, and was followed by many more studies by others, culminating in the Nobel Prize awards to Lefkowitz and Kobilka.

Phenomena such as receptor activation and deactivation, the role of receptor oligomerization, receptor desensitization, biased signalling, the importance of receptor modulation by allosteric drugs etc. have been intensively investigated over last two decades.

Interest in understanding any of the above-mentioned aspects of GPCR structures has triggered important methodological developments in time-resolved crystallography, in NMR techniques, in cryoEM and in MD techniques, to mention just some of the techniques involved. It has also been accompanied by important refinements of biochemical procedures for expression in a variety of hosts and purification strategies.

This Special Issue of Molecules is intended for all those researchers who study structural or functional aspects of GPCRs, or help to refine methods that are important for improving our understanding of drug–GPCR interactions in order to produce novel and better GPCR-interacting drugs.

Prof. Dr. Oliver Zerbe
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Molecules is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • GPCR drug interactions
  • Receptor activation and desensitization
  • Allosteric effects
  • Biased signaling
  • Receptor stabilization
  • GPCR dynamics
  • GPCR oligomerization

Published Papers (8 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Review

17 pages, 3347 KiB  
Article
GPCR Activation States Induced by Nanobodies and Mini-G Proteins Compared by NMR Spectroscopy
by Philip Rößler, Daniel Mayer, Ching-Ju Tsai, Dmitry B. Veprintsev, Gebhard F. X. Schertler and Alvar D. Gossert
Molecules 2020, 25(24), 5984; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25245984 - 17 Dec 2020
Cited by 9 | Viewed by 4482
Abstract
In this work, we examine methyl nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the methionine ε-[13CH3] labelled thermostabilized β1 adrenergic receptor from turkey in association with a variety of different effectors, including mini-Gs and nanobody 60 (Nb60), which [...] Read more.
In this work, we examine methyl nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra of the methionine ε-[13CH3] labelled thermostabilized β1 adrenergic receptor from turkey in association with a variety of different effectors, including mini-Gs and nanobody 60 (Nb60), which have not been previously studied in complex with β1 adrenergic receptor (β1AR) by NMR. Complexes with pindolol and Nb60 induce highly similar inactive states of the receptor, closely resembling the resting state conformational ensemble. We show that, upon binding of mini-Gs or nanobody 80 (Nb80), large allosteric changes throughout the receptor take place. The conformation of tβ1AR stabilized by the native-like mini-Gs protein is highly similar to the conformation induced by the currently used surrogate Nb80. Interestingly, in both cases residual dynamics are present, which were not observed in the resting states. Finally, we reproduce a pharmaceutically relevant situation, where an antagonist abolishes the interaction of the receptor with the mini-G protein in a competitive manner, validating the functional integrity of our preparation. The presented system is therefore well suited for reproducing the individual steps of the activation cycle of a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) in vitro and serves as a basis for functional and pharmacological characterizations of more native-like systems in the future. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

22 pages, 4825 KiB  
Article
The Dynamics of the Neuropeptide Y Receptor Type 1 Investigated by Solid-State NMR and Molecular Dynamics Simulation
by Alexander Vogel, Mathias Bosse, Marcel Gauglitz, Sarah Wistuba, Peter Schmidt, Anette Kaiser, Vsevolod V. Gurevich, Annette G. Beck-Sickinger, Peter W. Hildebrand and Daniel Huster
Molecules 2020, 25(23), 5489; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25235489 - 24 Nov 2020
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 3377
Abstract
We report data on the structural dynamics of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) type 1 (Y1R), a typical representative of class A peptide ligand GPCRs, using a combination of solid-state NMR and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. First, the equilibrium dynamics of [...] Read more.
We report data on the structural dynamics of the neuropeptide Y (NPY) G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) type 1 (Y1R), a typical representative of class A peptide ligand GPCRs, using a combination of solid-state NMR and molecular dynamics (MD) simulation. First, the equilibrium dynamics of Y1R were studied using 15N-NMR and quantitative determination of 1H-13C order parameters through the measurement of dipolar couplings in separated-local-field NMR experiments. Order parameters reporting the amplitudes of the molecular motions of the C-H bond vectors of Y1R in DMPC membranes are 0.57 for the Cα sites and lower in the side chains (0.37 for the CH2 and 0.18 for the CH3 groups). Different NMR excitation schemes identify relatively rigid and also dynamic segments of the molecule. In monounsaturated membranes composed of longer lipid chains, Y1R is more rigid, attributed to a higher hydrophobic thickness of the lipid membrane. The presence of an antagonist or NPY has little influence on the amplitude of motions, whereas the addition of agonist and arrestin led to a pronounced rigidization. To investigate Y1R dynamics with site resolution, we conducted extensive all-atom MD simulations of the apo and antagonist-bound state. In each state, three replicas with a length of 20 μs (with one exception, where the trajectory length was 10 μs) were conducted. In these simulations, order parameters of each residue were determined and showed high values in the transmembrane helices, whereas the loops and termini exhibit much lower order. The extracellular helix segments undergo larger amplitude motions than their intracellular counterparts, whereas the opposite is observed for the loops, Helix 8, and termini. Only minor differences in order were observed between the apo and antagonist-bound state, whereas the time scale of the motions is shorter for the apo state. Although these relatively fast motions occurring with correlation times of ns up to a few µs have no direct relevance for receptor activation, it is believed that they represent the prerequisite for larger conformational transitions in proteins. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

21 pages, 4388 KiB  
Article
Probing the Y2 Receptor on Transmembrane, Intra- and Extra-Cellular Sites for EPR Measurements
by Jeannette M. Laugwitz, Haleh H. Haeri, Anette Kaiser, Ulrike Krug, Dariush Hinderberger, Annette G. Beck-Sickinger and Peter Schmidt
Molecules 2020, 25(18), 4143; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25184143 - 10 Sep 2020
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 2815
Abstract
The function of G protein-coupled receptors is intrinsically linked to their conformational dynamics. In conjugation with site-directed spin labeling, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy provides powerful tools to study the highly dynamic conformational states of these proteins. Here, we explored positions for nitroxide [...] Read more.
The function of G protein-coupled receptors is intrinsically linked to their conformational dynamics. In conjugation with site-directed spin labeling, electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy provides powerful tools to study the highly dynamic conformational states of these proteins. Here, we explored positions for nitroxide spin labeling coupled to single cysteines, introduced at transmembrane, intra- and extra-cellular sites of the human neuropeptide Y2 receptor. Receptor mutants were functionally analyzed in cell culture system, expressed in Escherichia coli fermentation with yields of up to 10 mg of purified protein per liter expression medium and functionally reconstituted into a lipid bicelle environment. Successful spin labeling was confirmed by a fluorescence assay and continuous wave EPR measurements. EPR spectra revealed mobile and immobile populations, indicating multiple dynamic conformational states of the receptor. We found that the singly mutated positions by MTSL ((1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-2,5-dihydro-1H-pyrrol-3-yl) methyl methanesulfonothioate) have a water exposed immobilized conformation as their main conformation, while in case of the IDSL (bis(1-oxyl-2,2,5,5-tetramethyl-3-imidazolin-4-yl) disulfide) labeled positions, the main conformation are mainly of hydrophobic nature. Further, double cysteine mutants were generated and examined for potential applications of distance measurements by double electron–electron resonance (DEER) pulsed EPR technique on the receptor. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Review

Jump to: Research

24 pages, 9909 KiB  
Review
The Structural Basis of Peptide Binding at Class A G Protein-Coupled Receptors
by Oanh Vu, Brian Joseph Bender, Lisa Pankewitz, Daniel Huster, Annette G. Beck-Sickinger and Jens Meiler
Molecules 2022, 27(1), 210; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules27010210 - 30 Dec 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3085
Abstract
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest membrane protein family and a significant target class for therapeutics. Receptors from GPCRs’ largest class, class A, influence virtually every aspect of human physiology. About 45% of the members of this family endogenously bind flexible peptides [...] Read more.
G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest membrane protein family and a significant target class for therapeutics. Receptors from GPCRs’ largest class, class A, influence virtually every aspect of human physiology. About 45% of the members of this family endogenously bind flexible peptides or peptides segments within larger protein ligands. While many of these peptides have been structurally characterized in their solution state, the few studies of peptides in their receptor-bound state suggest that these peptides interact with a shared set of residues and undergo significant conformational changes. For the purpose of understanding binding dynamics and the development of peptidomimetic drug compounds, further studies should investigate the peptide ligands that are complexed to their cognate receptor. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 3949 KiB  
Review
Engineering of Challenging G Protein-Coupled Receptors for Structure Determination and Biophysical Studies
by Yann Waltenspühl, Janosch Ehrenmann, Christoph Klenk and Andreas Plückthun
Molecules 2021, 26(5), 1465; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules26051465 - 08 Mar 2021
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 3252
Abstract
Membrane proteins such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exert fundamental biological functions and are involved in a multitude of physiological responses, making these receptors ideal drug targets. Drug discovery programs targeting GPCRs have been greatly facilitated by the emergence of high-resolution structures and [...] Read more.
Membrane proteins such as G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exert fundamental biological functions and are involved in a multitude of physiological responses, making these receptors ideal drug targets. Drug discovery programs targeting GPCRs have been greatly facilitated by the emergence of high-resolution structures and the resulting opportunities to identify new chemical entities through structure-based drug design. To enable the determination of high-resolution structures of GPCRs, most receptors have to be engineered to overcome intrinsic hurdles such as their poor stability and low expression levels. In recent years, multiple engineering approaches have been developed to specifically address the technical difficulties of working with GPCRs, which are now beginning to make more challenging receptors accessible to detailed studies. Importantly, successfully engineered GPCRs are not only valuable in X-ray crystallography, but further enable biophysical studies with nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy, surface plasmon resonance, native mass spectrometry, and fluorescence anisotropy measurements, all of which are important for the detailed mechanistic understanding, which is the prerequisite for successful drug design. Here, we summarize engineering strategies based on directed evolution to reduce workload and enable biophysical experiments of particularly challenging GPCRs. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

39 pages, 5759 KiB  
Review
Structure and Dynamics of GPCRs in Lipid Membranes: Physical Principles and Experimental Approaches
by Andrew J. Y. Jones, Florian Gabriel, Aditi Tandale and Daniel Nietlispach
Molecules 2020, 25(20), 4729; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25204729 - 15 Oct 2020
Cited by 34 | Viewed by 6866
Abstract
Over the past decade, the vast amount of information generated through structural and biophysical studies of GPCRs has provided unprecedented mechanistic insight into the complex signalling behaviour of these receptors. With this recent information surge, it has also become increasingly apparent that in [...] Read more.
Over the past decade, the vast amount of information generated through structural and biophysical studies of GPCRs has provided unprecedented mechanistic insight into the complex signalling behaviour of these receptors. With this recent information surge, it has also become increasingly apparent that in order to reproduce the various effects that lipids and membranes exert on the biological function for these allosteric receptors, in vitro studies of GPCRs need to be conducted under conditions that adequately approximate the native lipid bilayer environment. In the first part of this review, we assess some of the more general effects that a membrane environment exerts on lipid bilayer-embedded proteins such as GPCRs. This is then followed by the consideration of more specific effects, including stoichiometric interactions with specific lipid subtypes. In the final section, we survey a range of different membrane mimetics that are currently used for in vitro studies, with a focus on NMR applications. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 931 KiB  
Review
Structure-Function Analyses of Human Bitter Taste Receptors—Where Do We Stand?
by Maik Behrens and Florian Ziegler
Molecules 2020, 25(19), 4423; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25194423 - 26 Sep 2020
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 4666
Abstract
The finding that bitter taste receptors are expressed in numerous tissues outside the oral cavity and fulfill important roles in metabolic regulation, innate immunity and respiratory control, have made these receptors important targets for drug discovery. Efficient drug discovery depends heavily on detailed [...] Read more.
The finding that bitter taste receptors are expressed in numerous tissues outside the oral cavity and fulfill important roles in metabolic regulation, innate immunity and respiratory control, have made these receptors important targets for drug discovery. Efficient drug discovery depends heavily on detailed knowledge on structure-function-relationships of the target receptors. Unfortunately, experimental structures of bitter taste receptors are still lacking, and hence, the field relies mostly on structures obtained by molecular modeling combined with functional experiments and point mutageneses. The present article summarizes the current knowledge on the structure–function relationships of human bitter taste receptors. Although these receptors are difficult to express in heterologous systems and their homology with other G protein-coupled receptors is very low, detailed information are available at least for some of these receptors. Full article
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

33 pages, 3039 KiB  
Review
A Paradigm for Peptide Hormone-GPCR Analyses
by Fred Naider and Jeffrey M. Becker
Molecules 2020, 25(18), 4272; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/molecules25184272 - 18 Sep 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 3114
Abstract
Work from our laboratories over the last 35 years that has focused on Ste2p, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), and its tridecapeptide ligand α-factor is reviewed. Our work utilized the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system for understanding peptide-GPCR interactions. It explored [...] Read more.
Work from our laboratories over the last 35 years that has focused on Ste2p, a G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR), and its tridecapeptide ligand α-factor is reviewed. Our work utilized the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a model system for understanding peptide-GPCR interactions. It explored the structure and function of synthetic α-factor analogs and biosynthetic receptor domains, as well as designed mutations of Ste2p. The results and conclusions are described using the nuclear magnetic resonance interrogation of synthetic Ste2p transmembrane domains (TMs), the fluorescence interrogation of agonist and antagonist binding, the biochemical crosslinking of peptide analogs to Ste2p, and the phenotypes of receptor mutants. We identified the ligand-binding domain in Ste2p, the functional assemblies of TMs, unexpected and interesting ligand analogs; gained insights into the bound α-factor structure; and unraveled the function and structures of various Ste2p domains, including the N-terminus, TMs, loops connecting the TMs, and the C-terminus. Our studies showed interactions between specific residues of Ste2p in an active state, but not resting state, and the effect of ligand activation on the dimerization of Ste2p. We show that, using a battery of different biochemical and genetic approaches, deep insight can be gained into the structure and conformational dynamics of GPCR-peptide interactions in the absence of a crystal structure. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

Back to TopTop