Studies in Hinduism: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Developments

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Humanities/Philosophies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (30 September 2020) | Viewed by 33149

Printed Edition Available!
A printed edition of this Special Issue is available here.

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Independent Researcher, Honorary Fellow, Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies, Oxford, UK
Interests: intellectual and cultural history of colonial India
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

The inner structural complexities and the ideological heterogeneity of Hinduism never cease to amaze the interested scholar, an important reason, we feel, why it must be subjected to recurring scrutiny.  In truth, such heterogeneities have also been instrumental in shaping the nature of older and quite persistent debates about whether Hinduism was indeed ‘discovered’ as claimed by scholars in the 1960s and 1970s or ‘invented’ as came to be increasingly accepted by an influential body of scholars subsequently. Looking back at such debates, one cannot resist the conclusion that important though as these have been, it is also time to outgrow the somewhat vacuous nature of these debates which appears to defy a consensual resolution. Much can be argued from either side. Thus, one may pertinently ask if it was indeed ‘Hinduism’ that was discovered by evangelists, merchants, soldiers, scholars, and bureaucrats in the age of the mercantile dominance and company rule. On the other hand, it is just as possible that conceptual continuities in time are somewhat obscured by the lack of a single descriptive word or term. Thus, in Hinduism, a reformist intent representing efforts to progressively change society or religion is considerably older than the accepted use of the term ‘reform’ and an accompanying discourse. Of the two points of view presented here, one presumes that Hindu society and religion gained momentum only with the entrenchment of British colonial rule, while the other projects contemporary developments to a remote historical past, simply for the sake of tendentiously establishing imagined continuities in time and space.

This Special Issue of Religions takes cognizance of such debates only tangentially; its overarching focus is on studying. more closely and critically, relatively unknown or under-researched facets of Hindu thought and socioreligious praxis. Alongside, there is also the attempt to revisit existing interpretations of texts, personalities or events inasmuch as they help us to overthrow simplistic presumptions about the complex nature of interpenetrations between the ‘secular’ and the ‘religious’. This is carried out within a hermeneutic framework that connects historical perspectives on Hinduism with contemporary developments. It is indeed our intention to more fully understand the dynamic interplay of locus and movement within the Hindu cultural and religious world; the dialogic nature of human language, ideas, imagination, intentions, and behavior which alone can bring us closer to an understanding of the actively relational aspects between that which appears at first glance to be only discrete subjects. We proceed on the premise that it is indeed difficult to fully understand a being either in nature or in human history by merely fixing it in its bare self identity. Social identities and subjectivities are perhaps best understood in relation to what appears as their very contradiction.

Contributors are encouraged to work on the following areas/themes:

  • The transformative nature of human subjectivities;
  • Transnational Hinduism;
  • Pedagogic challenges to the teaching of Hinduism in the West;
  • Representation and re-presentation of texts, events, figures;
  • New media forms and Hinduism;
  • Connecting the human and Divine in Hinduism.

This volume represents fresh thinking by a team of scholars, well established in their line of work. Further, contributors to this volume represent a variety of subdisciplines in the Humanities and Social Sciences: history, religious studies, philosophy, literature, and cultural anthropology. This has contributed substantially towards making this project instructively interdisciplinary in nature. The editor and his team of contributors see this particular volume as only one in a series of successive attempts at understanding the complexly structured world of Hinduism.

Prof. Dr. Amiya P. Sen
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • hermeneutics
  • secular
  • historical perspectives
  • contemporary developments
  • complexity of structures
  • subjectivities
  • media
  • transnational
  • identities and oppositions
  • pedagogic challenges

Published Papers (9 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

5 pages, 156 KiB  
Editorial
Introduction to the Special Issue on “Hinduism: Historical Perspectives and Contemporary Developments”
by Amiya P. Sen
Religions 2021, 12(2), 85; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel12020085 - 28 Jan 2021
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1504
Abstract
In 2002, the Government of India published a Universities Handbook based on a survey of 273 institutions of higher learning in India (excluding the 12,000-odd colleges that existed at the time) and of their academic programs [...] Full article

Research

Jump to: Editorial

19 pages, 251 KiB  
Article
A Complex Ultimate Reality: The Metaphysics of the Four Yogas
by Jeffery D. Long
Religions 2020, 11(12), 655; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11120655 - 07 Dec 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2584
Abstract
This essay will pose and seek to answer the following question: If, as Swami Vivekananda claims, the four yogas are independent and equally effective paths to God-realization and liberation from the cycle of rebirth, then what must reality be like? What ontology is [...] Read more.
This essay will pose and seek to answer the following question: If, as Swami Vivekananda claims, the four yogas are independent and equally effective paths to God-realization and liberation from the cycle of rebirth, then what must reality be like? What ontology is implied by the claim that the four yogas are all equally effective paths to the supreme goal of religious life? What metaphysical conditions would enable this pluralistic assertion to be true? Swami Vivekananda’s worldview is frequently identified with Advaita Vedānta. We shall see that Vivekananda’s teaching is certainly Advaitic in what could be called a broad sense. As Anantanand Rambachan and others, however, have pointed out, it would be incorrect to identify Swami Vivekananda’s teachings in any rigid or dogmatic sense with the classical Advaita Vedānta of Śaṅkara; this is because Vivekananda’s teaching departs from that of Śaṅkara in some significant ways, not least in his assertion of the independent salvific efficacy of the four yogas. This essay will argue that Swami Vivekananda’s pluralism, based on the concept of the four yogas, is far more akin to the deep religious pluralism that is advocated by contemporary philosophers of religion in the Whiteheadian tradition of process thought like David Ray Griffin and John Cobb, the classical Jain doctrines of relativity (anekāntavāda, nayavāda, and syādvāda), and, most especially, the Vijñāna Vedānta of Vivekananda’s guru, Sri Ramakrishna, than any of these approaches is to the Advaita Vedānta of Śaṅkara. Advaita Vedānta, in Vivekananda’s pluralistic worldview, becomes one valid conceptual matrix among many that bear the ability to support an efficacious path to liberation. This essay is intended not as an historical reconstruction of Vivekananda’s thought, so much as a constructive philosophical contribution to the ongoing scholarly conversations about both religious (and, more broadly, worldview) pluralism and the religious and philosophical legacies of both Sri Ramakrishna and Swami Vivekananda. The former conversation has arrived at something of an impasse (as recounted by Kenneth Rose), while the latter conversation has recently been revived, thanks to the work of Swami Medhananda (formerly Ayon Maharaj) and Arpita Mitra. Full article
15 pages, 258 KiB  
Article
From Līlā to Nitya and Back: Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa and Vedānta
by Arpita Mitra
Religions 2020, 11(11), 569; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11110569 - 30 Oct 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1511
Abstract
There has been a long-standing academic debate on the religious orientation of Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa (1836–1886), one of the leading religious figures of modern India. In the light of his teachings, it is possible to accept that Rāmakṛṣṇa’s ideas were Vedāntic, albeit not [...] Read more.
There has been a long-standing academic debate on the religious orientation of Śrī Rāmakṛṣṇa Paramahaṁsa (1836–1886), one of the leading religious figures of modern India. In the light of his teachings, it is possible to accept that Rāmakṛṣṇa’s ideas were Vedāntic, albeit not in a sectarian or exclusive way. This article explores the question of where exactly to place him in the chequered history of Vedāntic ideas. It points out that Rāmakṛṣṇa repeatedly referred to different states of consciousness while explaining the difference in the attitudes towards the Divine. This is the basis of his harmonization of the different streams within Vedānta. Again, it is also the basis of his understanding of the place of śakti. He demonstrated that, as long as one has I-consciousness, one is operating within the jurisdiction of śakti, and has to accept śakti as real. On the other hand, in the state of samādhi, which is the only state in which the I-consciosuness disappears, there is neither One nor many. The article also shows that, while Rāmakṛṣṇa accepted all of the different views within Vedānta, he was probably not as distant from the Advaita Vedānta philosopher Ādi Śaṁkara as he has been made out to be. Full article
26 pages, 380 KiB  
Article
‘Locating Viṣnupriyā in the Tradition’: Women, Devotion, and Bengali Vaiṣṇavism in Colonial Times
by Santanu Dey
Religions 2020, 11(11), 555; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11110555 - 26 Oct 2020
Viewed by 3355
Abstract
This article tries to map the gender element in Bengali Vaiṣṇavism by focusing on the evolution of the image of Viṣnupriyā, Caitanya’s second wife, as it progressed from the pre-colonial hagiographic tradition to the novel theorization of Gaura–Viṣnupriyā dual worship in the colonial [...] Read more.
This article tries to map the gender element in Bengali Vaiṣṇavism by focusing on the evolution of the image of Viṣnupriyā, Caitanya’s second wife, as it progressed from the pre-colonial hagiographic tradition to the novel theorization of Gaura–Viṣnupriyā dual worship in the colonial period. It explores the varied ways in which certain segments of educated Bengali intelligentsia actively involved in reassessing Vaiṣṇavism in colonial times disseminated the idea that Viṣnupriyā was not just a symbol of unwavering devotion, of resolute penance, and (after Caitanya’s death) of ideal widowhood, but also deserved to be worshiped by Bengalis along with Caitanya as a divine couple. The article contends that while the ways of biographic imaging of Viṣnupriyā reveals the fissures and frictions within the colonial Vaiṣṇava reform process, it also highlights various continuities with pre-colonial strands of Vaiṣṇava thought. Full article
18 pages, 4347 KiB  
Article
Shani on the Web: Virality and Vitality in Digital Popular Hinduism
by Varuni Bhatia
Religions 2020, 11(9), 456; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11090456 - 06 Sep 2020
Viewed by 3793
Abstract
What do god posters circulating online tell us about the practice of popular Hinduism in the age of digital mediatization? The article seeks to address the question by exploring images and god posters dedicated to the planetary deity Shani on Web 2.0. The [...] Read more.
What do god posters circulating online tell us about the practice of popular Hinduism in the age of digital mediatization? The article seeks to address the question by exploring images and god posters dedicated to the planetary deity Shani on Web 2.0. The article tracks Shani’s presence on a range of online platforms—from the religion and culture pages of newspapers to YouTube videos and social media platforms. Using Shani’s presence on the Web as a case study, the article argues that content drawn from popular Hinduism, dealing with astrology, ritual, religious vows and observances, form a significant and substantial aspect of online Hinduism. The article draws attention to the specific affordances of Web 2.0 to radically rethink what engaging with the sacred object in a virtual realm may entail. In doing so, it indicates what the future of Hindu religiosity may look like. Full article
Show Figures

Figure 1

14 pages, 298 KiB  
Article
Why Śrīdhara Svāmī? The Makings of a Successful Sanskrit Commentary
by Ravi M. Gupta
Religions 2020, 11(9), 436; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11090436 - 24 Aug 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2568
Abstract
Śrīdhara Svāmī’s commentary on the Bhāgavata Purāṇa, called Bhāvārtha-dīpikā and composed sometime between the mid-fourteenth to the mid-fifteenth centuries, has exerted extraordinary influence on later Bhāgavata commentaries, and indeed, on Vaiṣṇava traditions more generally. This article raises a straightforward question: “Why Śrīdhara?” [...] Read more.
Śrīdhara Svāmī’s commentary on the Bhāgavata Purāṇa, called Bhāvārtha-dīpikā and composed sometime between the mid-fourteenth to the mid-fifteenth centuries, has exerted extraordinary influence on later Bhāgavata commentaries, and indeed, on Vaiṣṇava traditions more generally. This article raises a straightforward question: “Why Śrīdhara?” Focusing on the Caitanya Vaiṣṇava tradition, particularly Jīva Gosvāmī, for whom Śrīdhara is foundational, we ask, “What is it about Śrīdhara Svāmī’s commentary—both stylistically and theologically—that made it so useful to Caitanya Vaiṣṇavas and other Bhāgavata commentators?” This question, to the extent that it can be answered, has implications for our understanding of Śrīdhara’s theology as well as the development of the early Caitanya Vaiṣṇava tradition, but it can also lend insight into the reasons for Śridhara’s influence more generally in early modern India. Full article
19 pages, 310 KiB  
Article
The Feminization of Love and the Indwelling of God: Theological Investigations Across Indic Contexts
by Ankur Barua and Hina Khalid
Religions 2020, 11(8), 414; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11080414 - 12 Aug 2020
Viewed by 3146
Abstract
Our essay is a thematic exploration of the malleability of idioms, imageries, and affectivities of Hindu bhakti across the borderlines of certain Indic worldviews. We highlight the theological motif of the feminine-feminised quest of the seeker (virahiṇī) for her divine beloved [...] Read more.
Our essay is a thematic exploration of the malleability of idioms, imageries, and affectivities of Hindu bhakti across the borderlines of certain Indic worldviews. We highlight the theological motif of the feminine-feminised quest of the seeker (virahiṇī) for her divine beloved in some Hindu expressions shaped by the paradigmatic scriptural text Bhāgavata-purāṇa and in some Punjabi Sufi articulations of the transcendent God’s innermost presence to the pilgrim self. The leitmotif that the divine reality is the “intimate stranger” who cannot be humanly grasped and who is yet already present in the recesses of the virahiṇī’s self is expressed with distinctive inflections both in bhakti-based Vedānta and in some Indo-Muslim spiritual universes. This study is also an exploration of some of the common conceptual currencies of devotional subjectivities that cannot be straightforwardly cast into the monolithic moulds of “Hindu” or “Muslim” in pre-modern South Asia. Thus, we highlight the essentially contested nature of the categories of “Hinduism” and “Indian Islam” by indicating that they should be regarded as dynamic clusters of constellated concepts whose contours have been often reshaped through concrete socio-historical contestations, borrowings, and adaptations on the fissured lands of al-Hind. Full article
28 pages, 357 KiB  
Article
Was Swami Vivekananda a Hindu Supremacist? Revisiting a Long-Standing Debate
by Swami Medhananda
Religions 2020, 11(7), 368; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11070368 - 17 Jul 2020
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 11387
Abstract
In the past several decades, numerous scholars have contended that Swami Vivekananda was a Hindu supremacist in the guise of a liberal preacher of the harmony of all religions. Jyotirmaya Sharma follows their lead in his provocative book, A Restatement of Religion: Swami [...] Read more.
In the past several decades, numerous scholars have contended that Swami Vivekananda was a Hindu supremacist in the guise of a liberal preacher of the harmony of all religions. Jyotirmaya Sharma follows their lead in his provocative book, A Restatement of Religion: Swami Vivekananda and the Making of Hindu Nationalism (2013). According to Sharma, Vivekananda was “the father and preceptor of Hindutva,” a Hindu chauvinist who favored the existing caste system, denigrated non-Hindu religions, and deviated from his guru Sri Ramakrishna’s more liberal and egalitarian teachings. This article has two main aims. First, I critically examine the central arguments of Sharma’s book and identify serious weaknesses in his methodology and his specific interpretations of Vivekananda’s work. Second, I try to shed new light on Vivekananda’s views on Hinduism, religious diversity, the caste system, and Ramakrishna by building on the existing scholarship, taking into account various facets of his complex thought, and examining the ways that his views evolved in certain respects. I argue that Vivekananda was not a Hindu supremacist but a cosmopolitan patriot who strove to prepare the spiritual foundations for the Indian freedom movement, scathingly criticized the hereditary caste system, and followed Ramakrishna in championing the pluralist doctrine that various religions are equally capable of leading to salvation. Full article
16 pages, 776 KiB  
Article
Ecce Homo—Behold the Human! Reading Life-Narratives in Times of Colonial Modernity
by Nandini Bhattacharya
Religions 2020, 11(6), 300; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11060300 - 19 Jun 2020
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2303
Abstract
The essay explores Bankimchandra Chatterjee’s Krishnacaritra—published in 1886—the life of a humanised god, as engaged in cross cultural dialogues with John Robert Seeley’s Ecce Homo, Natural Religion, and The Expansion of England in particular, and the broader European tendency of [...] Read more.
The essay explores Bankimchandra Chatterjee’s Krishnacaritra—published in 1886—the life of a humanised god, as engaged in cross cultural dialogues with John Robert Seeley’s Ecce Homo, Natural Religion, and The Expansion of England in particular, and the broader European tendency of naturalising religions in general. It contends that the rise of historicised life writing genres in Europe was organically related to the demythologised, verifiable god-lives writing project. Bankimchandra’s Krishnacarita is embedded within a dense matrix of nineteenth century Indian secular life writing projects and its projection of Krishna as a cultural icon within an incipient nationalist imagining. The essay while exploring such fraught writing projects in Victorian England and nineteenth century colonial Bengal, concludes that ‘secularism’ arrives as not as religion’s Other but as its camouflaging in ethico-cultural guise. Secularism rides on the backs of such demystified god life narratives to rationalise ethico-culturally informed global empires. Full article
Back to TopTop