Myth-Making in the Hebrew Bible

A special issue of Religions (ISSN 2077-1444). This special issue belongs to the section "Religions and Theologies".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (25 June 2022) | Viewed by 13777

Special Issue Editor


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Religion, Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA
Interests: Hebrew Bible; ancient Israelite religion; ancient Near Eastern literature; myth theory; violence; northwest Semitic languages; Second Temple Judaism

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Many of us likely remember the first time we learned about ancient Near Eastern stories from “the World of the Bible”. These stories invoked curiosity with their unfamiliarity as well as their unmistakable similarities with biblical and classical stories. The way that cosmogonic, anthropogonic, and etiological stories account for human lived experience and our observable world is intriguing to a broad audience. Certainly, the topic of myth remains of interest in the general public, as evident in popular books and movies, and across many scholarly areas. Among biblical scholars, many of us recall the first time we heard about Canaanite Myth and Hebrew Epic, the title of Frank Moore Cross’s impactful book as well as his nuanced contextualizing contrast that some have taken as a dichotomy. Cross’s work utilizes the categories of myth, epic, and history, while analyzing his data in ways that cut across such genre distinctions. Cross’s work was initially published in 1973, and it remains essential reading for biblical scholars interested in the topic of myth-making. 

The focus of this volume is analysis of myth-making in the Hebrew Bible, with the purpose of demonstrating how attention to myth-making improves our historical and comparative studies of the Hebrew Bible in its ancient Near Eastern context. The scope is inclusive of historical, cultural, sociological, literary, and cognitive perspectives. Because myth is a topic that appeals to a popular audience as well as scholars in diverse areas, it is important to foster conversation between Religious Studies more generally, Biblical Studies, and those who study myth theory within any scholarly discipline. The topic of myth has been central within Religious Studies as is discussion of theories of myth. It is often partnered with the study of ritual and theories of ritual within Religious Studies, for many fitting reasons. In Biblical Studies, there has been strong engagement with ritual theory, while the study of myth has remained somewhat sidelined, even as many scholars over the past 40 years have promoted discussion of myth, including Rogerson, Oden, Childs, Roberts, Parker, and Wyatt.

This Special Issue features biblical scholars working directly with myth-making in the Hebrew Bible, engaging with past theorization of myth and theorizing myth-making themselves. The study of myth-making in the Hebrew Bible is central to interdisciplinary work on ancient Near Eastern and ancient Mediterranean literature and religion. Therefore, a primary aim of this issue is for biblical scholars to speak to scholars within our field as well as scholars in adjacent fields, who might have had less exposure to how far discussion of myth-making in the Hebrew Bible has come: far beyond outdated popular dichotomies of the Bible, as proper history and Truth, versus Myth, as false or others’ stories. This Special Issue will contribute to existing scholarship on the topic of myth-making in the Hebrew Bible by building on foundational discussions of the category of myth within Biblical Studies and taking up the charge of past scholars to continue to scrutinize how we implicitly and explicitly use theories of myth. The work represented in this issue will reflect substantial scholarly conversation with the 2014 volume Myth and Scripture as well as the annual conference proceedings of the Society of Biblical Literature unit “The Bible, Myth, and Myth Theory.”

Dr. Debra Scoggins Ballentine
Guest Editor

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a double-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Religions is an international peer-reviewed open access monthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 1800 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Hebrew Bible
  • myth
  • myth theory
  • myth-making
  • ancient storytelling, cosmogony
  • anthropology
  • ancient religion
  • ancient literature

Published Papers (6 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Editorial

Jump to: Research

2 pages, 146 KiB  
Editorial
Introduction to Myth-Making in the Hebrew Bible
by Debra Scoggins Ballentine
Religions 2022, 13(12), 1183; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel13121183 - 03 Dec 2022
Viewed by 875
Abstract
Do you remember the first time you learned about ancient Near Eastern stories from the ‘World of the Bible’ [...] Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myth-Making in the Hebrew Bible)

Research

Jump to: Editorial

13 pages, 323 KiB  
Article
Theorizing Myth to Facilitate Comparison and Re-Description in Biblical Studies
by Debra Scoggins Ballentine
Religions 2022, 13(9), 767; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel13090767 - 23 Aug 2022
Viewed by 1286
Abstract
This article promotes the theorizing of myth in ways that facilitate comparison and re-description of data within Biblical Studies. After addressing background categorical issues within Religious Studies and Biblical Studies, I chart the old model of contrasting Bible as Truth with myth, [...] Read more.
This article promotes the theorizing of myth in ways that facilitate comparison and re-description of data within Biblical Studies. After addressing background categorical issues within Religious Studies and Biblical Studies, I chart the old model of contrasting Bible as Truth with myth, including Eusebius’s antique articulation as well as Romantic notions of myth. Challenging outmoded theories, I identify scholarship that works towards rectification of the category myth, with the aim of bolstering scholarly conversations beyond disciplinary boundaries. Finally, the article suggests rectification of multiple Biblical Studies categories related to myth. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myth-Making in the Hebrew Bible)
10 pages, 339 KiB  
Article
Myths of Brotherly Animosity and the Civil Wars of Biblical Israel
by Diklah Zohar
Religions 2022, 13(8), 753; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel13080753 - 18 Aug 2022
Viewed by 1288
Abstract
A recurrent theme in the Hebrew Bible is brotherly animosity. Cain and Abel, Jacob and Esau, and Solomon and Adonijah are but a few examples. This variety seems to reflect a fundamental conflict in ancient society. In this article, I argue that all [...] Read more.
A recurrent theme in the Hebrew Bible is brotherly animosity. Cain and Abel, Jacob and Esau, and Solomon and Adonijah are but a few examples. This variety seems to reflect a fundamental conflict in ancient society. In this article, I argue that all these stories function as ethos myths. After describing the various stories with an attempt to single out the motivations behind them, they will be put into the social context that probably fueled them. Although the stories are extremely varied, they all share at least one common element, namely: it is always the younger brother who turns out to be God’s favorite. A second element is the jealousy of the older brother in the special status of the younger. Against the historical background of long-lasting civil war between the smaller kingdom of Judah and the larger, militarily stronger, and more financially stable kingdom of Israel, I argue that these stories were adapted to fit into the Judean narrative for the sake of strengthening its self-image as a small kingdom struggling against a stronger opponent who is motivated by jealousy. The mythical conflict reflects the complexity of the struggle between the two kingdoms, in which Judah identifies itself as being the ‘younger child’ or the ‘little brother’, who is blessed by God. Such myths give justification to the military struggle and feed the self-conviction narratives of the superiority of Judah as being divinely chosen. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myth-Making in the Hebrew Bible)
21 pages, 687 KiB  
Article
Myth, Meaning, and the Work of Life: Enuma Elish and the Garden of Eden (Genesis 2:4–3:24) on the Value of Human Labor and Memory
by Amy L. Balogh
Religions 2022, 13(8), 703; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel13080703 - 30 Jul 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 3733
Abstract
This article offers a new comparison of the ancient Mesopotamian story Enuma Elish and the biblical Garden of Eden story (Genesis 2:4–3:24) as a case study that demonstrates how attention to myth theory and comparative method might improve studies of ancient Southwest Asian [...] Read more.
This article offers a new comparison of the ancient Mesopotamian story Enuma Elish and the biblical Garden of Eden story (Genesis 2:4–3:24) as a case study that demonstrates how attention to myth theory and comparative method might improve studies of ancient Southwest Asian literatures. This comparison illustrates the connection between myth, meaning making, and the lived experiences that produced and perpetuated these myths by focusing on the cultural value of work and memory as expressed in both narratives. In contrast to previous modes of comparison that conclude with claims to the Bible’s superiority, this comparison uses tools from myth studies and comparative religion toward a clearer understanding of the cultural messaging of both myths regarding the purpose of human life. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myth-Making in the Hebrew Bible)
21 pages, 396 KiB  
Article
Rebels in Biblical and Chinese Texts: A Comparative Study on the Interplay of Myth and History
by Aryeh Amihay and Lupeng Li
Religions 2020, 11(12), 644; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11120644 - 01 Dec 2020
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 2757
Abstract
This study offers a new approach for studying biblical myth in two directions: first, by expanding the scope of investigation beyond the clearly mythological elements to other areas of biblical literature, and second, by drawing comparisons to classical Chinese literature. This article thus [...] Read more.
This study offers a new approach for studying biblical myth in two directions: first, by expanding the scope of investigation beyond the clearly mythological elements to other areas of biblical literature, and second, by drawing comparisons to classical Chinese literature. This article thus reconsiders the relationship between myth and history in both biblical and Chinese literature, while seeking to broaden the endeavor of the comparative method in biblical studies. Two examples are offered: (1) the story of Moses’s call narrative and his relationship with Aaron in Exodus in light of the story of Xiang Liang and Xiang Ji in the Shiji; (2) the story of Saul and David in 1 Samuel compared with the story of Dong Zhuo and Lü Bu in the Romance of the Three Kingdoms. Both comparisons demonstrate the operation of Claude Lévi-Strauss’s inversion principle. Conclusions regarding each of these literatures are presented separately, followed by cross-cultural insights and shared aspects in the study of myth, historiography, and religion. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myth-Making in the Hebrew Bible)
18 pages, 258 KiB  
Article
The Hebrew Bible as Mythic “Vocabulary”: Towards a New Comparative Mythology
by Andrew Tobolowsky
Religions 2020, 11(9), 459; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rel11090459 - 08 Sep 2020
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 2668
Abstract
In this article, I argue that the history of the study of myth in the Hebrew Bible has been, and continues to be, shaped in negative ways by an essentially Romantic Nationalist understanding of the relationship between a people and their traditions. I [...] Read more.
In this article, I argue that the history of the study of myth in the Hebrew Bible has been, and continues to be, shaped in negative ways by an essentially Romantic Nationalist understanding of the relationship between a people and their traditions. I then argue that more appropriate ways of modeling the construction of the Bible’s myths, combined with new investigations into the historical development of biblical traditions themselves, reveals a surprising continuity between the myth-making activity of biblical authors and editors and that of all those who retell and adapt biblical traditions in extrabiblical materials. I conclude that the existence of large-scale continuities between the adaptation of biblical traditions in different periods allows for a new kind of comparative investigation. By studying the use of biblical traditions in biblical literature, extrabiblical literature, and art, on approximately equal terms, we can gain new insights about the construction of biblical myths themselves, while connecting the study of the Hebrew Bible far more closely to the study of other bodies of tradition, elsewhere and later on. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Myth-Making in the Hebrew Bible)
Back to TopTop