remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

New Insights in InSAR and GNSS Measurements

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292).

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (1 June 2022) | Viewed by 4665

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Research Scientist, Roy M. Huffington Department of Earth Sciences, Southern Methodist University, 3225 Daniel Ave, Suite 207, Dallas, TX 75205, USA
Interests: InSAR; GNSS; advances in geodetic measurements
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Department of Earth and Atmospheric Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA
Interests: InSAR; geo-hazard mapping; soil moisture; permafrost

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

In recent decades, SAR Interferometry (InSAR) and Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSSs) have made a giant stride in locating geohazards and monitoring the Earth surface. Both methods of geodetic measurements from air and space have changed the way people understand the process of Earth systems. As more SAR and GNSS data are obtained from satellite, airborne, and ground-based platforms, the effective managements of huge datasets have been an issue for scientific communities. Researchers have strived for the development of data management and started to embody artificial intelligence for solving problems inherent in those big data (e.g., noise reduction, identification of geohazards). Furthermore, sensing and processing technologies of SAR and GNSS have been greatly improved and enabled us to capture signals of our interests that could be buried among noise sources. Consequently, future advances in InSAR and GNSS will make us obtain more precise and temporally and spatially dense measurements.

This Special Issue will gather original research articles, reviews, technical notes, and letters to provide the future insights of InSAR and GNSS development in data management and sensor and processing technologies. Research studies are not limited to the single use of InSAR or GNSS, but synergetic use with InSAR, GNSS, and other sensors (i.e., LiDAR, optical images, field survey) is also welcome. We also encourage studies including new ideas of big data analysis, noise reduction, identification of geohazards, and automated processing in InSAR and GNSS.

Dr. Jin-Woo Kim
Dr. Yusuf Eshqi Molan
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Keywords

  • Advances in InSAR and GNSS
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Machine learning
  • Integrated use of geodetic measurements
  • Developments in sensing and processing technology

Published Papers (2 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

18 pages, 4417 KiB  
Article
Fusion of Spatially Heterogeneous GNSS and InSAR Deformation Data Using a Multiresolution Segmentation Algorithm and Its Application in the Inversion of Slip Distribution
by Huineng Yan, Wujiao Dai, Hongzhi Liu, Han Gao, Wesley R. Neely and Wenbin Xu
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(14), 3293; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14143293 - 08 Jul 2022
Cited by 5 | Viewed by 1672
Abstract
The fusion of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) deformation data can leverage the advantages of GNSS high temporal resolution and InSAR high spatial resolution, and obtain more abundant deformation data for constraints on geophysical structural and mechanical [...] Read more.
The fusion of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) and interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) deformation data can leverage the advantages of GNSS high temporal resolution and InSAR high spatial resolution, and obtain more abundant deformation data for constraints on geophysical structural and mechanical parameters. Existing studies seldom consider the spatial heterogeneity of largescale deformation data, which easily leads to obvious spatial aggregation of errors in the results of fusion. Here, we propose a novel multiresolution segmentation fusion (MRSF) method that uses a multiresolution segmentation algorithm to automatically classify the spatial heterogeneity of InSAR deformation data with similar deformation characteristics. We applied the MRSF method to the fusion of GNSS and InSAR deformation data covering the central valley aquifer system (CVAS) in southern California to verify its precision and robustness. Results show that the MRSF method can accurately reflect spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of displacement data and reliably estimate deformation for the times and locations of missing data. We then tested this method for geophysical parameter estimation by constructing three different sets of data, including dense GNSS sites, sparse GNSS sites, and sparse GNSS sites fused with InSAR data using MRSF, to invert the slip distribution of the Cascadia subduction zone. Results show that the inverted slip of the fused InSAR and GNSS data is comparable to that of the dense GNSS sites. Therefore, the MRSF method can obtain deformation results with high precision and high spatiotemporal resolution and effectively compensate for the lack of data caused by sparse GNSS sites during the geophysical inversion process. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in InSAR and GNSS Measurements)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 8241 KiB  
Article
Accuracy of Code GNSS Receivers under Various Conditions
by Weronika Magiera, Inese Vārna, Ingus Mitrofanovs, Gunārs Silabrieds, Artur Krawczyk, Bogdan Skorupa, Michal Apollo and Kamil Maciuk
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(11), 2615; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14112615 - 30 May 2022
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 2460
Abstract
The main objective of this research work was to study the accuracy of GNSS code receivers under poor sky visibility conditions based on measurements on three different objects (point, line, and surface) and additionally to test results on point positioning with good sky [...] Read more.
The main objective of this research work was to study the accuracy of GNSS code receivers under poor sky visibility conditions based on measurements on three different objects (point, line, and surface) and additionally to test results on point positioning with good sky visibility conditions. The measurement was based on 3 smartphones (in the same mode to check repeatability) and 2 handheld receivers (working in GPS+GLONASS modes). The methodology was based on the RTK technique, whose coordinates were assumed as a reference. Based on the results, the significant influence of measuring in the vicinity of high trees on the obtained accuracy was observed for both the precise geodetic equipment and the tested code receivers. More favorable results of point positioning were observed when using mobile phones. On the other hand, in the case of measurement in motion, the handheld receivers guaranteed higher accuracy. Moreover, the study showed that handheld receivers might achieve a better accuracy than smartphones, and that position might be determined with a greater accuracy and reliability. Furthermore, handheld receivers were characterized by a smaller number of outliers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Insights in InSAR and GNSS Measurements)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop