remotesensing-logo

Journal Browser

Journal Browser

Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds

A special issue of Remote Sensing (ISSN 2072-4292). This special issue belongs to the section "Ocean Remote Sensing".

Deadline for manuscript submissions: closed (31 October 2022) | Viewed by 51143

Special Issue Editors


E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Techology, Pasadena, CA 91214, USA
Interests: ocean vector winds; ocean surface topography; scatterometry; synthetic aperture radar; interferometry; planetary science

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Jet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Techology, Pasadena, CA 91214, USA
Interests: ocean vector winds; precipitation; scatterometry; microwave radiometry; atmospheric circulation modeling; ocean-atmosphere coupling; mesoscale atmospheric dynamics; atmospheric microphysics; tropical cyclone dynamics

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
Remote Sensing Systems, 444 10th St, Suite 200, Santa Rosa, CA 95401, USA
Interests: ocean vector wind retrievals from space; development of scatterometer geophysical model functions; climate data records; satellite data intercalibration; calibration/validation of wind data including hurricane force winds; water cycle and atmospheric circulation variability; statistical, spectral and climate analysis of large datasets
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
College of Earth, Ocean, and Atmospheric Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA
Interests: air-sea interactions; satellite oceanography and meteorology; precipitation; wind-driven ocean circulation

E-Mail Website
Guest Editor
CPASS, UCAR—NESDIS/NOAA/STAR, College Park, MD 20740, USA
Interests: satellite remote sensing of winds and waves; tropical and extratropical cyclones; radar and radiometer calibration; scatterometer, radiometer and GNSS-R measurement techniques; forward modeling; retrieval methodologies; geophysical data interpretation; data applications
Special Issues, Collections and Topics in MDPI journals
Global Science & Technology, Inc., 7855 Walker Drive, Suite, 200 Greenbelt, MD 20770, USA
Interests: microwave ocean remote sensing; radar; scatterometry; radiometry; dropsondes; extreme winds

Special Issue Information

Dear Colleagues,

Ocean surface winds are one of the key components of the Earth system. They are a major driver of the circulation of both the ocean and the atmosphere. Accurate knowledge of winds, related wind stress, and wind-driven ocean currents is necessary to understand and quantify air-sea fluxes of heat and nutrients. Heat fluxes and their relationship to global sea surface temperature, temperatures at depth, and ocean heat content are necessary to understand and predict global climate change and its effect on the global ocean. Knowledge of nutrient fluxes, on the other hand, is important for sustaining global fisheries and developing an understanding of the effect of climate change on marine life.

Ocean surface winds affect air–sea interactions, fueling weather systems by modulating sensible and latent heat fluxes. They reveal the regions where the converging near-surface air provides favorable dynamical conditions for the development of convection and precipitation. Understanding these interactions is critical for improving weather forecasting on a variety of spatial and temporal scales—from the isolated convective cores, to the organized mesoscale systems, to hurricanes, to seasonal and intraseasonal phenomena such as MJO, El Nino and trends and variability in large-scale atmospheric circulation (e.g. monsoon rains).  Indeed, ocean surface winds and stress are essential climate variables (ECV), as identified by the Global Climate Observing System (GCOS) (GCOS-200, 2016).

In addition to its scientific necessity, accurate ocean vector wind climatology is also a requirement for developing offshore wind power generation facilities as a method to reduce worldwide dependence on fossil fuels and ameliorate ongoing global climate change. Ocean surface winds vary on several important timescales, including diurnal variation (e.g. on-shore and off-shore oscillations in coastal winds), seasonal variation, and longer term variation which correlates with long-term ocean current and sea surface temperature periodicity, including the well-known El Nino Southern Oscillation. Because of diurnal variation, it is important to obtain global ocean surface vector winds multiple times a day, to avoid aliasing the diurnal signature into longer term climatology. In order to achieve sufficiently frequent global coverage, it is necessary to employ space borne remote sensors.

Two primary remote sensors have been utilized to measure ocean surface winds; microwave radiometers (e.g. GMI, AMSR, SSM/I, SMAP) which typically measure wind speed only, and scatterometers (e.g. QuikSCAT, ASCAT), which measure speed and direction in order to obtain full vector wind fields. Full wind vectors can also be obtained from polarimetric microwave radiometers, such as WindSAT, with significant degradation in directional performance for low wind speeds. High resolution wind fields with regional, rather than global, coverage have also been obtained using a synthetic aperture radar. Wind in tropical cyclones is measured by some of these instruments, and these measurements are very valuable for forecasting intensity and size of storms.

In this Special Issue, we plan to bring together papers describing how to improve global ocean vector wind measurements in terms of accuracy, resolution, and frequency of sampling, as well as application papers describing advances in the scientific use of remotely sensed ocean vector winds.

We invite papers on the following related topics.

  1. New remote sensor technology for the improved measuring of ocean surface winds in terms of spatial extent (e.g. closer to the coast), frequency of global coverage, measurement resolution, or any other improvement that will significantly impact the scientific utility of the measurement.
  2. Methods for improving the accuracy of ocean surface winds from current or historical sensor data, including, but not limited to, fusion with other sensors, improved quality control, improved accuracy, or increases in the extent of the data record.
  3. Methods for cross calibrating or harmonizing winds, measured from different sensors in order to produce more consistent and more accurate climate data records, over longer periods of time and with more frequent global coverage.
  4. Methods for simultaneously retrieving ocean surface winds and other related geophysical parameters of interest (e.g. ocean currents, salinity, sea surface temperature, precipitation), where combining wind with the other parameter greatly enhances the scientific utility of both.

Novel scientific or technological uses of remotely sensed ocean surface winds, including, but not limited to: the estimation of air–sea heat, momentum, and nutrient fluxes; the detection of changes in intraseasonal to decadal climate modes (i.e. Wind Bursts, MJO, ENSO, PDO, …); the evaluation and improvement of models of ocean or atmosphere dynamics through data assimilation or process studies;  understanding hurricane genesis and evolution; the detection of trends in large-scale atmospheric circulation, as depicted by its lower-level branch; understanding the role of surface winds in regulating the geographical distribution of precipitation; and using ocean surface wind climatology to optimize power generation from offshore facilities.

Dr. Bryan Stiles
Dr. Svetla Hristova-Veleva
Dr. Lucrezia Ricciardulli
Dr. Larry O’Neill
Dr. Zorana Jelenak
Dr. Joe Sapp
Guest Editors

Manuscript Submission Information

Manuscripts should be submitted online at www.mdpi.com by registering and logging in to this website. Once you are registered, click here to go to the submission form. Manuscripts can be submitted until the deadline. All submissions that pass pre-check are peer-reviewed. Accepted papers will be published continuously in the journal (as soon as accepted) and will be listed together on the special issue website. Research articles, review articles as well as short communications are invited. For planned papers, a title and short abstract (about 100 words) can be sent to the Editorial Office for announcement on this website.

Submitted manuscripts should not have been published previously, nor be under consideration for publication elsewhere (except conference proceedings papers). All manuscripts are thoroughly refereed through a single-blind peer-review process. A guide for authors and other relevant information for submission of manuscripts is available on the Instructions for Authors page. Remote Sensing is an international peer-reviewed open access semimonthly journal published by MDPI.

Please visit the Instructions for Authors page before submitting a manuscript. The Article Processing Charge (APC) for publication in this open access journal is 2700 CHF (Swiss Francs). Submitted papers should be well formatted and use good English. Authors may use MDPI's English editing service prior to publication or during author revisions.

Published Papers (23 papers)

Order results
Result details
Select all
Export citation of selected articles as:

Research

Jump to: Other

21 pages, 9136 KiB  
Article
Spatio-Temporal Variability of Wind Energy in the Caspian Sea: An Ecosystem Service Modeling Approach
by Milad Rahimi, Mehdi Gholamalifard, Akbar Rashidi, Bonyad Ahmadi, Andrey G. Kostianoy and Aleksander V. Semenov
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(24), 6263; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14246263 - 10 Dec 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1288
Abstract
The ecosystem services that can be obtained from the oceans and seas are very diverse; one of the sources of energy is wind power. The Caspian Sea is characterized by a fragile ecosystem that is under serious anthropogenic stress, including oil and gas [...] Read more.
The ecosystem services that can be obtained from the oceans and seas are very diverse; one of the sources of energy is wind power. The Caspian Sea is characterized by a fragile ecosystem that is under serious anthropogenic stress, including oil and gas production and transportation. In particular, rich oil and gas resources in the region make renewables less important for the Caspian Sea Region. Depletion of hydrocarbon resources, a rise of their price on the international markets, geopolitical tensions, a decrease in the Caspian Sea level, regional climate change, and other factors make exploring offshore wind energy production timely. In order to model the offshore wind energy of the Caspian Sea, data from the ERA-Interim atmospheric reanalysis were used from 1980 to 2015 combined with QuikSCAT and RapidSCAT remote sensing data. The modeling results showed a wind power density of 173 W/m2 as an average value for the Caspian Sea. For the 1980–2015 period, 57% of the Caspian Sea area shows a decreasing trend in wind power density, with a total insignificant drop of 16.85 W/m2. The highest negative rate of change is observed in the Northern Caspian, which seems to be more influenced by regional climate change. The Caspian Sea regions with the highest potential for offshore wind energy production are identified and discussed. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 8463 KiB  
Article
SAR and ASCAT Tropical Cyclone Wind Speed Reconciliation
by Weicheng Ni, Ad Stoffelen, Kaijun Ren, Xiaofeng Yang and Jur Vogelzang
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(21), 5535; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14215535 - 02 Nov 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1709
Abstract
Wind speed reconciliation across different wind sources is critically needed for extending available satellite wind records in Tropical Cyclones. The deviations between wind references of extremes, such as the moored buoy data and dropsonde wind estimates for guidance on geophysical model function development, [...] Read more.
Wind speed reconciliation across different wind sources is critically needed for extending available satellite wind records in Tropical Cyclones. The deviations between wind references of extremes, such as the moored buoy data and dropsonde wind estimates for guidance on geophysical model function development, are one of the main causes of wind speed differences for wind products, for instance, the overestimation of Synthetic Aperture Radars (SARs) relative to ASCAT winds. The study proposes a new wind speed adjustment to achieve mutual adjustment between ASCAT CMOD7 winds and simultaneous SAR wind speeds. The so-called CMOD7D-v2 adjustment is constructed based on the statistical analysis of SAR and ASCAT Tropical Cyclone acquisitions between 2016 and 2021, showing a satisfactory performance in wind speed reconciliation for winds with speeds higher than 14 m/s. Furthermore, the error characteristics of the CMOD7D-v2 adjustment for Tropical Cyclone winds are analyzed using the Triple Collocation analysis technique. The analysis results show that the proposed wind adjustment can reduce ASCAT wind errors by around 16.0% when adjusting ASCAT winds to SAR wind speeds. In particular, when downscaling SAR winds, the improvement in ASCAT wind errors can be up to 42.3%, effectively alleviating wind speed differences across wind sources. Furthermore, to avoid the impacts of large footprints by ASCAT sensors, wind speeds retrieved from SAR VV signals (acting as a substitute for ASCAT winds) are adjusted accordingly and compared against SAR dual-polarized winds and collocated Stepped Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) observations. We find that the bias values of adjusted winds are lower than products from other adjustment schemes by around 5 m/s at the most extreme values. These promising results verify the plausibility of the CMOD7D-v2 adjustment, which is conducive to SAR and ASCAT wind speed comparisons and extreme wind analysis in Tropical Cyclone cases. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

16 pages, 1780 KiB  
Article
On the Accuracy and Consistency of Quintuple Collocation Analysis of In Situ, Scatterometer, and NWP Winds
by Jur Vogelzang and Ad Stoffelen
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(18), 4552; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14184552 - 12 Sep 2022
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 1249
Abstract
The accuracy and consistency of a quintuple collocation analysis of ocean surface vector winds from buoys, scatterometers, and NWP forecasts is established. A new solution method is introduced for the general multiple collocation problem formulated in terms of covariance equations. By a logarithmic [...] Read more.
The accuracy and consistency of a quintuple collocation analysis of ocean surface vector winds from buoys, scatterometers, and NWP forecasts is established. A new solution method is introduced for the general multiple collocation problem formulated in terms of covariance equations. By a logarithmic transformation, the covariance equations reduce to ordinary linear equations that can be handled using standard methods. The method can be applied to each determined or overdetermined subset of the covariance equations. Representativeness errors are estimated from differences in spatial variances. The results are in good agreement with those from quadruple collocation analyses reported elsewhere. The geometric mean of all solutions from determined subsets of the covariance equations equals the least-squares solution of all equations. The accuracy of the solutions is estimated from synthetic data sets with random Gaussian errors that are constructed from the buoy data using the values of the calibration coefficients and error variances from the quintuple collocation analysis. For the calibration coefficients, the spread in the models is smaller than the accuracy, but for the observation error variances, the spread and the accuracy are about equal only for representativeness errors evaluated at a scale of 200 km for u and 100 km for v. Some average error covariances differ significantly from zero, indicating weak inconsistencies in the underlying error model. Possible causes for this are discussed. With a data set of 2454 collocations, the accuracy in the observation error standard deviation is 0.02 to 0.03 m/s at the one-sigma level for all observing systems. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

9 pages, 2044 KiB  
Communication
The Effect of Error Non-Orthogonality on Triple Collocation Analyses
by Jur Vogelzang, Ad Stoffelen and Anton Verhoef
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(17), 4268; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14174268 - 30 Aug 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1005
Abstract
Triple collocation analysis is an established technique for calculating the relative linear intercalibration coefficients and observation error variances for physical quantities measured simultaneously in space and time by three different observation systems. A simple parameterized error model is used. It relies on a [...] Read more.
Triple collocation analysis is an established technique for calculating the relative linear intercalibration coefficients and observation error variances for physical quantities measured simultaneously in space and time by three different observation systems. A simple parameterized error model is used. It relies on a few assumptions, one of which is that the observation errors are independent of the magnitude of the observed quantities. This is referred to as error orthogonality. Using an ocean surface vector winds data set of 44,948 collocations, this study shows that the violation of error orthogonality does affect the calibration coefficients but has only a small second-order effect on the observation error variances of the calibrated data. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

28 pages, 7365 KiB  
Article
Improving the Accuracy of the Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform (CCMP) Ocean Vector Winds
by Carl Mears, Tong Lee, Lucrezia Ricciardulli, Xiaochun Wang and Frank Wentz
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(17), 4230; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14174230 - 27 Aug 2022
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 3331
Abstract
The Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform (CCMP) Ocean vector wind analysis is a level-4 product that uses a variational method to combine satellite retrievals of ocean winds with a background wind field from a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. The result is a spatially complete estimate [...] Read more.
The Cross-Calibrated Multi-Platform (CCMP) Ocean vector wind analysis is a level-4 product that uses a variational method to combine satellite retrievals of ocean winds with a background wind field from a numerical weather prediction (NWP) model. The result is a spatially complete estimate of global ocean vector winds on six-hour intervals that are closely tied to satellite measurements. The current versions of CCMP are fairly accurate at low to moderate wind speeds (<15 m/s) but are systematically too low at high winds at locations/times where a collocated satellite measurement is not available. This is mainly because the NWP winds tend to be lower than satellite winds, especially at high wind speed. The current long-term CCMP version, version 2.0, also shows spurious variations on interannual to decadal time scales caused by the interaction of satellite/model bias with the varying amount of satellite measurements available as satellite missions begin and end. To alleviate these issues, here we explore methods to adjust the source datasets to more closely match each other before they are combined. The resultant new CCMP wind analysis agrees better with long-term trend estimates from satellite observations and reanalysis than previous versions. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

20 pages, 5551 KiB  
Article
Sea Surface Wind Retrieval under Rainy Conditions from Active and Passive Microwave Measurements
by Shubo Liu, Yinan Li, Xiaojiao Yang, Wu Zhou, Ailing Lv, Xu Jin and Hongxing Dang
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(13), 3016; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14133016 - 23 Jun 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 1364
Abstract
The space-borne microwave radiometers and scatterometers can effectively measure global sea surface winds under non-precipitation. However, the measurements in rainy conditions significantly degrade, which are usually flagged as poor quality or invalidated for some scientific purposes. This paper develops a combined active–passive wind [...] Read more.
The space-borne microwave radiometers and scatterometers can effectively measure global sea surface winds under non-precipitation. However, the measurements in rainy conditions significantly degrade, which are usually flagged as poor quality or invalidated for some scientific purposes. This paper develops a combined active–passive wind vector retrieval model for rainy conditions based on the HY-2B radiometer and scatterometer measurements. In our model, the polarization ratio of brightness temperatures at 6.925 GHz (PR06) is used as an indicator to implicitly represent the rain effect. For wind speed retrieval, a statistical regression model is trained as a function of PR06 and brightness temperatures of the radiometer. Moreover, two new geophysical model functions, including rain effect, are developed for wind direction inversion. Comparisons between HY-2B retrieval results and ERA5 wind products indicate that the retrieval model performs well under all rainy conditions. The overall root mean squared errors (RMSEs) of wind speed and direction retrievals are 1.60 m/s and 20.60°, respectively. With an increase in the rain rate, the wind retrieval performance degrades slightly and still provides a reliable retrieval result. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

15 pages, 6550 KiB  
Article
QuikSCAT Climatological Data Record: Land Contamination Flagging and Correction
by Alexander G. Fore, Bryan W. Stiles, Paul Ted Strub and Richard D. West
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(10), 2487; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14102487 - 23 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1433
Abstract
We develop, utilize, and validate techniques to produce a global data set of accurate coastal ocean surface vector winds. The dataset extends as near to the coast as 5 km and includes 10 years of SeaWinds on QuikSCAT ocean scatterometer data obtained from [...] Read more.
We develop, utilize, and validate techniques to produce a global data set of accurate coastal ocean surface vector winds. The dataset extends as near to the coast as 5 km and includes 10 years of SeaWinds on QuikSCAT ocean scatterometer data obtained from 1999 to 2009. We demonstrate improved retrievals over other large land-locked bodies of water as well, such as the Caspian Sea and the Great lakes. To determine the coastal winds we quantify the extent of land contamination in each scatterometer backscatter measurement and to the extent possible remove that contamination. After the measurements are thus corrected we retrieve winds with the corrected measurements using a previously published algorithm which has been extensively used for JPL scatterometer wind products. The coastal processing vastly increases the number of wind vector cells near coasts. We have ten times the number of wind vectors within 10 km of coast as without coastal processing, and over twice as many at 20 km from coast. These new wind vectors are high-quality, and have zero effect on non-coastal wind vectors. The effect of residual land contamination is quantified by comparing to buoys at varying distance from the coast and comparing coastal wind vector cells to oceanward neighbors. We show that the non-coastal QuikSCAT processing has very few good wind vectors nearer to the coast than about 22.5 km. In comparison to buoys, and oceanward neighbors, we find a small increase in speed errors of these new coastal wind vectors versus the performance of non-coastal QuikSCAT at 22.5 km, indicating the high-quality of these new coastal wind vectors. A quality control scheme is employed that flags regions where the coastal wind retrieval is poor due to the assumptions inherent in the technique being locally invalid. The coastal winds retrieved in this manner have been publicly distributed to the oceanography community and utilized in other published works. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

26 pages, 7394 KiB  
Article
Evaluation of Nearshore QuikSCAT 4.1 and ERA-5 Wind Stress and Wind Stress Curl Fields over Eastern Boundary Currents
by P. Ted Strub and Corinne James
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(9), 2251; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14092251 - 07 May 2022
Cited by 1 | Viewed by 1694
Abstract
Fields of coastal wind stress and wind stress curl in the 10–100 km next to the land control the processes of upwelling and downwelling of nutrients and water properties that are vital to highly productive coastal marine ecosystems. Here we ask the question: [...] Read more.
Fields of coastal wind stress and wind stress curl in the 10–100 km next to the land control the processes of upwelling and downwelling of nutrients and water properties that are vital to highly productive coastal marine ecosystems. Here we ask the question: Do the present surface wind stress products from a satellite-borne scatterometer (QuikSCAT) and an atmospheric reanalysis model (ERA-5) systematically overestimate the magnitude of wind speed and stress in the 10–50 km next to the coast? We compare QuikSCAT wind speed retrievals to the relatively unused wind speed retrievals from satellite altimeters, which are able to approach closer to the coast than scatterometers without land reflections, due to their smaller radar footprints. Altimeter data on tracks approaching and crossing the coast indicate that the increases in coastal QuikSCAT wind speed values and ERA-5 coastal wind stress values are unrealistic. For analyses of wind speed and stress requiring high accuracy, especially those involving wind stress curl, we suggest considering individual Level 2B scatterometer wind retrievals as suspect at distances of 10 km and less from the coast, along with use of the Poor Coastal Processing flag. We found that similar increases in wind stress values next to the coast in gridded ERA-5 fields are not due to errors in the model physics or wind speeds. They are created during the interpolation of wind stress from the original model grid to a regular rectangular grid. We recommend that researchers who are analyzing wind stress and wind stress curl should calculate wind stress themselves from the gridded ERA-5 vector wind speed fields, rather than using the interpolated model wind stress or curl fields. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

19 pages, 8567 KiB  
Article
A Ka-Band Wind Geophysical Model Function Using Doppler Scatterometer Measurements from the Air-Sea Interaction Tower Experiment
by Federica Polverari, Alexander Wineteer, Ernesto Rodríguez, Dragana Perkovic-Martin, Paul Siqueira, J. Thomas Farrar, Max Adam, Marc Closa Tarrés and James B. Edson
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(9), 2067; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14092067 - 26 Apr 2022
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2487
Abstract
Physical understanding and modeling of Ka-band ocean surface backscatter is challenging due to a lack of measurements. In the framework of the NASA Earth Ventures Suborbital-3 Submesoscale Ocean Dynamics Experiment (S-MODE) mission, a Ka-Band Ocean continuous wave Doppler Scatterometer (KaBODS) built by the [...] Read more.
Physical understanding and modeling of Ka-band ocean surface backscatter is challenging due to a lack of measurements. In the framework of the NASA Earth Ventures Suborbital-3 Submesoscale Ocean Dynamics Experiment (S-MODE) mission, a Ka-Band Ocean continuous wave Doppler Scatterometer (KaBODS) built by the University of Massachusetts, Amherst (UMass) was installed on the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) Air-Sea Interaction Tower. Together with ASIT anemometers, a new data set of Ka-band ocean surface backscatter measurements along with surface wind/wave and weather parameters was collected. In this work, we present the KaBODS instrument and an empirical Ka-band wind Geophysical Model Function (GMF), the so-called ASIT GMF, based on the KaBODS data collected over a period of three months, from October 2019 to January 2020, for incidence angles ranging between 40° and 68°. The ASIT GMF results are compared with an existing Ka-band wind GMF developed from data collected during a tower experiment conducted over the Black Sea. The two GMFs show differences in terms of wind speed and wind direction sensitivity. However, they are consistent in the values of the standard deviation of the model residuals. This suggests an intrinsic geophysical variability characterizing the Ka-band surface backscatter. The observed variability does not significantly change when filtering out swell-dominated data, indicating that the long-wave induced backscatter modulation is not the primary source of the KaBODS backscatter variability. We observe evidence of wave breaking events, which increase the skewness of the backscatter distribution in linear space, consistent with previous studies. Interestingly, a better agreement is seen between the GMFs and the actual data at an incidence angle of 60° for both GMFs, and the statistical analysis of the model residuals shows a reduced backscatter variability at this incidence angle. This study shows that the ASIT data set is a valuable reference for studies of Ka-band backscatter. Further investigations are on-going to fully characterize the observed variability and its implication in the wind GMF development. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 12779 KiB  
Article
Development of a New Tropical Cyclone Strip Segment Retrieval Model for C-Band Cross-Polarized SAR Data
by Letian Lv, Yanmin Zhang, Yunhua Wang, Wenzheng Jiang and Daozhong Sun
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(7), 1637; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14071637 - 29 Mar 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1495
Abstract
Compared with co-polarized (HH/VV) normalized radar cross-section (NRCS) backscattered from the sea surface, there is no saturation phenomenon in cross-polarized (HV/VH) NRCS when wind speed is greater than about 20 m/s, so cross-polarized synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images can be used for high [...] Read more.
Compared with co-polarized (HH/VV) normalized radar cross-section (NRCS) backscattered from the sea surface, there is no saturation phenomenon in cross-polarized (HV/VH) NRCS when wind speed is greater than about 20 m/s, so cross-polarized synthetic aperture radar (SAR) images can be used for high wind speed monitoring. In this work, a new geophysical model function (GMF) is proposed to describe the relation of the C-band cross-polarized NRCS with wind speed and radar incidence angle. Here, sixteen ScanSAR wide mode SAR images acquired by RADARSAT-2 (RS-2) under tropical cyclone (TC) conditions and the matching wind speed data from the European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) and the Stepped-Frequency Microwave Radiometer (SFMR) are collected and divided into datasets A and B. Dataset A is used for analyzing the effects of the wind field and radar incidence angle on the reference noise-removed cross-polarized NRCS, and for proposing the new GMF for each sub-swath of the SAR images, while dataset B is used to retrieve wind speed and evaluate the validity of the new GMF. The comparisons between the wind speeds retrieved by the new GMF and the collocated ECMWF and SFMR data demonstrate the excellent performance of the new GMF for wind speed retrieval. To analyze the universality of the new GMF, wind speed retrievals based on 32 Sentinel-1A/B (S-1A/B) extra-wide-swath (EW) mode images acquired under TC conditions are also compared with the collocated wind speeds measured by the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) radiometer, and the retrieved wind speeds have RMSE of 3.667 m/s and a bias of 2.767 m/s. The successful applications in high wind speed retrieval of different tropical cyclones again supports the availability of the new GMF. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

18 pages, 20145 KiB  
Article
Annual Modulation of Diurnal Winds in the Tropical Oceans
by Donata Giglio, Sarah T. Gille, Bruce D. Cornuelle, Aneesh C. Subramanian, F. Joseph Turk, Svetla Hristova-Veleva and Devon Northcott
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(3), 459; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14030459 - 19 Jan 2022
Cited by 3 | Viewed by 1871
Abstract
Projections of future climate are sensitive to the representation of upper-ocean diurnal variability, including the diurnal cycle of winds. Two different methods suitable for time series with missing data are used here to characterize how observed diurnal winds vary over the year. One [...] Read more.
Projections of future climate are sensitive to the representation of upper-ocean diurnal variability, including the diurnal cycle of winds. Two different methods suitable for time series with missing data are used here to characterize how observed diurnal winds vary over the year. One is based on diurnal composites of mooring data, and the other is based on harmonic analysis via a least squares fit and is able to isolate annual (i.e., 1 cycle per year) modulation of diurnal variability. Results show that the diurnal amplitude in meridional winds is larger than in zonal winds and peaks in the tropical Pacific, where diurnal variability in zonal winds is overall weaker compared to other basins. Furthermore, the amplitude and phasing of diurnal winds in the tropical oceans are not uniform in time, with overall larger differences through the year in the meridional component of tropical winds. Estimating the annual modulation of the diurnal signal implies resolving both the diurnal energy peak and also the modulation of this peak by the annual cycle. This leads to a recommendation for sampling at least 6 times per day and for a duration of at least 3 years. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

17 pages, 6881 KiB  
Article
Towards the Sea Wind Measurement with the Airborne Scatterometer Having the Rotating-Beam Antenna Mounted over Fuselage
by Alexey Nekrasov and Alena Khachaturian
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(24), 5165; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13245165 - 20 Dec 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2364
Abstract
Extension of the existing airborne radars’ applicability is a perspective approach to the remote sensing of the environment. Here we investigate the capability of the rotating-beam radar installed over the fuselage for the sea surface wind measurement based on the comparison of the [...] Read more.
Extension of the existing airborne radars’ applicability is a perspective approach to the remote sensing of the environment. Here we investigate the capability of the rotating-beam radar installed over the fuselage for the sea surface wind measurement based on the comparison of the backscatter with the respective geophysical model function (GMF). We also consider the robustness of the proposed approach to the partial shading of the underlying water surface by the aircraft nose, tail, and wings. The wind retrieval algorithms have been developed and evaluated using Monte-Carlo simulations. We find our results promising both for the development of new remote sensing systems as well as the functional enhancement of existing airborne radars. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

15 pages, 4609 KiB  
Article
Intercalibration of Backscatter Measurements among Ku-Band Scatterometers Onboard the Chinese HY-2 Satellite Constellation
by Zhixiong Wang, Juhong Zou, Youguang Zhang, Ad Stoffelen, Wenming Lin, Yijun He, Qian Feng, Yi Zhang, Bo Mu and Mingsen Lin
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(23), 4783; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13234783 - 25 Nov 2021
Cited by 12 | Viewed by 2112
Abstract
The Chinese HY-2D satellite was launched on 19 May 2021, carrying a Ku-band scatterometer. Together with the operating scatterometers onboard the HY-2B and HY-2C satellites, the HY-2 series scatterometer constellation was built, constituting different satellite orbits and hence opportunity for mutual intercomparison and [...] Read more.
The Chinese HY-2D satellite was launched on 19 May 2021, carrying a Ku-band scatterometer. Together with the operating scatterometers onboard the HY-2B and HY-2C satellites, the HY-2 series scatterometer constellation was built, constituting different satellite orbits and hence opportunity for mutual intercomparison and intercalibration. To achieve intercalibration of backscatter measurements for these scatterometers, this study presents and performs three methods including: (1) direct comparison using collocated measurements, in which the nonlinear calibrations can also be derived; (2) intercalibration over the Amazon rainforest; (3) and the double-difference technique based on backscatter simulations over the global oceans, in which a geophysical model function and numerical weather prediction (NWP) model winds are needed. The results obtained using the three methods are comparable, i.e., the differences among them are within 0.1 dB. The intercalibration results are validated by comparing the HY-2 series scatterometer wind speeds with NWP model wind speeds. The curves of wind speed bias for the HY-2 series scatterometers are quite similar, particularly in wind speeds ranging from 4 to 20 m/s. Based on the well-intercalibrated backscatter measurements, consistent sea surface wind products from HY-2 series scatterometers can be produced, and greatly benefit data applications. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

25 pages, 9252 KiB  
Article
Intercalibration of ASCAT Scatterometer Winds from MetOp-A, -B, and -C, for a Stable Climate Data Record
by Lucrezia Ricciardulli and Andrew Manaster
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(18), 3678; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13183678 - 15 Sep 2021
Cited by 14 | Viewed by 3230
Abstract
Scatterometers provide very stable ocean vector wind data records. This is because they measure the ratio of backscattered to incident microwave signal over the ocean surface as opposed to an absolute quantity (e.g., emitted microwave signal). They provide an optimal source of observations [...] Read more.
Scatterometers provide very stable ocean vector wind data records. This is because they measure the ratio of backscattered to incident microwave signal over the ocean surface as opposed to an absolute quantity (e.g., emitted microwave signal). They provide an optimal source of observations for building a long ocean vector wind Climate Data Record (CDR). With this objective in mind, observations from different satellite platforms need to be assessed for high absolute accuracy versus a common ground truth and for fine cross-calibration during overlapping periods. Here we describe the methodology for developing a CDR of ocean surface winds from the C-band ASCAT scatterometers onboard MetOp-A, -B, and -C. This methodology is based on the following principles: a common Geophysical Model Function (GMF) and wind algorithm developed at Remote Sensing Systems (RSS) and the use of in situ and satellite winds to cross-calibrate the three scatterometers within the accuracy required for CDRs, about 0.1 m/s at the global monthly scale. Using multiple scatterometers and radiometers for comparison allows for the opportunity to isolate sensors that are drifting or experiencing step-changes as small as 0.05 m/s. We detected and corrected a couple of such changes in the ASCAT-A wind record. The ASCAT winds are now very stable over time and well cross-calibrated with each other. The full C-band wind CDR now covers 2007-present and can be easily extended in the next decade with the launch of the MetOp Second Generation scatterometers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

18 pages, 16429 KiB  
Article
A Study of Sea Surface Rain Identification Based on HY-2A Scatterometer
by Yihuan Peng, Xuetong Xie, Mingsen Lin, Lishan Ran, Feng Yuan, Yuan Zhou and Ling Tang
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(17), 3475; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13173475 - 01 Sep 2021
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 2112
Abstract
Rain affects the wind measurement accuracy of the Ku-band spaceborne scatterometer. In order to improve the quality of the retrieved wind field, it is necessary to identify and flag rain-contaminated data. In this study, an HY-2A scatterometer is used to study rain identification. [...] Read more.
Rain affects the wind measurement accuracy of the Ku-band spaceborne scatterometer. In order to improve the quality of the retrieved wind field, it is necessary to identify and flag rain-contaminated data. In this study, an HY-2A scatterometer is used to study rain identification. In addition to the conventional parameters, such as the retrieved wind speed, the wind direction relative to the along-track direction, and the normalized beam difference, the experiment expands the mean deviation of the backscattering coefficient, the beam difference between fore and aft, and the node number of the wind vector cell (WVC) as the sensitive parameters according to the microwave scattering characteristics of rain and the actual measurement situation of the HY-2A. Furthermore, a rain identification model for HY2 (HY2RRM) with the K-Nearest Neighborhood (KNN) algorithm was built. After several tests, the accuracy of the selected HY2RRM approach is found to about 88%, and about 70% of rain-contaminated data can be accurately identified. The research results are helpful for better understanding the characteristics of microwave backscattering and provide a possible way to further improve the wind field retrieval accuracy of the HY-2A scatterometer and other Ku-band scatterometers. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 6739 KiB  
Article
Tropical Cyclone Winds from WindSat, AMSR2, and SMAP: Comparison with the HWRF Model
by Andrew Manaster, Lucrezia Ricciardulli and Thomas Meissner
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(12), 2347; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13122347 - 16 Jun 2021
Cited by 16 | Viewed by 2790
Abstract
A new data set of tropical cyclone winds (‘TC-winds’) through rain as observed by the WindSat and AMSR2 microwave radiometers has been developed by making use of a linear combination of C- and X-band frequency channels. These winds, along with tropical cyclone winds [...] Read more.
A new data set of tropical cyclone winds (‘TC-winds’) through rain as observed by the WindSat and AMSR2 microwave radiometers has been developed by making use of a linear combination of C- and X-band frequency channels. These winds, along with tropical cyclone winds from the SMAP L-band radiometer, are compared with the Hurricane Weather Research and Forecasting (HWRF) model. Due to differences in spatial scales between the satellites and the high-resolution HWRF model, resampling must be performed on the model winds before comparisons are done. Various ways of spatial resampling are discussed in detail, and an optimal method is determined. Additionally, resampled model winds must be temporally interpolated to the time of the satellite before direct comparisons are made. This interpolation can occasionally result in un-physical 2D wind fields, especially for fast-moving storms. To assist users with this problem, a methodology for handling un-physical wind features is detailed. Results of overall comparisons between the satellites and HWRF for 19 storms between 2017 and 2020 displayed consistent storm features, with overall average biases less than 1 m/s and standard deviations below 4 m/s for all tropical cyclone winds between 10 and 60 m/s. Differences were seen when the comparisons were performed separately for the Atlantic and Pacific basins, with biases and standard deviations between the satellites and HWRF showing better agreement in the Atlantic. The impact of rain on the satellite wind retrievals is discussed, and no systematic bias was seen between the three sensors, despite the fact that they use different frequency channels in their tropical cyclone winds-through-rain retrieval algorithms. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

23 pages, 5748 KiB  
Article
Tropical Cyclone Wind Speeds from WindSat, AMSR and SMAP: Algorithm Development and Testing
by Thomas Meissner, Lucrezia Ricciardulli and Andrew Manaster
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(9), 1641; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13091641 - 22 Apr 2021
Cited by 20 | Viewed by 3343
Abstract
The measurement of ocean surface wind speeds in precipitation from satellite microwave radiometers is a challenging task. Rain attenuates the signal that is emitted from the ocean surface. Moreover, the rain and wind signals are very similar, which makes it difficult to distinguish [...] Read more.
The measurement of ocean surface wind speeds in precipitation from satellite microwave radiometers is a challenging task. Rain attenuates the signal that is emitted from the ocean surface. Moreover, the rain and wind signals are very similar, which makes it difficult to distinguish wind from rain. The rain contamination can be mitigated for radiometers that operate simultaneously at C-band and X-band channels, such as WindSat, AMSR-E and AMSR2. The basic principle is to use combinations between C-band and X-band channels that are sensitive to wind speed but relatively insensitive to rain. Based on this principle, we have developed algorithms for retrieving wind speeds in rain from the WindSat and AMSR sensors. These algorithms are statistical regressions and are trained specifically under tropical cyclone conditions. We lay out the steps of the algorithm development, training, and testing. The major source for training the algorithm is provided by wind speeds from the SMAP L-band radiometer, which have been proven to provide reliable wind speeds in strong storms and are not affected by rain. We show that the WindSat and AMSR tropical cyclone wind algorithms perform well under precipitation where standard passive wind speed retrievals fail. We examine the possibility of extending the C/X-band tropical cyclone wind algorithm to X/K-band channels and discuss how it can be broadened from tropical cyclone conditions to global winds in rain retrievals. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

27 pages, 9467 KiB  
Article
Ku- and Ka-Band Ocean Surface Radar Backscatter Model Functions at Low-Incidence Angles Using Full-Swath GPM DPR Data
by Alamgir Hossan and William Linwood Jones
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(8), 1569; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13081569 - 18 Apr 2021
Cited by 10 | Viewed by 3723
Abstract
This paper presents the results of the first characterization of coincident Ku- and Ka-band ocean surface normalized radar cross section measurements at earth incidence angles 0°–18° using one year of wide swath Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission dual frequency precipitation radar (DPR) data. [...] Read more.
This paper presents the results of the first characterization of coincident Ku- and Ka-band ocean surface normalized radar cross section measurements at earth incidence angles 0°–18° using one year of wide swath Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) mission dual frequency precipitation radar (DPR) data. Empirical geophysical model functions were derived for both bands, isotropic and directorial sensitivity were assessed, and finally, sea surface temperature (SST) dependence of radar backscatter, at both bands, were investigated. The Ka-band exhibited higher vector wind sensitivity for a low-to-moderate wind speeds regime, and the SST effects were also observed to be substantially larger at Ka-band than at Ku-band. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

24 pages, 17701 KiB  
Article
Multi-Scale LG-Mod Analysis for a More Reliable SAR Sea Surface Wind Directions Retrieval
by Fabio Michele Rana and Maria Adamo
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(3), 410; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13030410 - 25 Jan 2021
Cited by 2 | Viewed by 2178
Abstract
An improved version of the Local-Gradient-Modified (LG-Mod) algorithm for Sea Surface Wind (SSW) directions retrieval by means of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images is presented. A “local” multi-scale analysis of wind-aligned SAR patterns is introduced to improve the LG-Mod sensitivity to SAR backscattering [...] Read more.
An improved version of the Local-Gradient-Modified (LG-Mod) algorithm for Sea Surface Wind (SSW) directions retrieval by means of Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) images is presented. A “local” multi-scale analysis of wind-aligned SAR patterns is introduced to improve the LG-Mod sensitivity to SAR backscattering modulations, occurring locally with various spatial wavelengths. The Marginal Error parameter is redefined, and the adoption of the Directional Accuracy Maximization Criterion (DAMC) allows for the novel Multi-Scale (MS) LG-Mod to automatically select the local processing scale that may be regarded as optimal for pattern enhancement, once a discrete set of scales has been already fixed. Hence, this optimal scale successfully gives evidence to guarantee the best achievable local direction estimation. The assessment of the MS LG-Mod is carried on both simulated SAR images and a Sentinel-1 (S-1) dataset, consisting of 350 Interferometric Wide Swath Ground Range Multi-Look Detected High-Resolution images, which cover the region of the Gulf of Maine. In the latter case, the removal of artifacts and non-wind features from SAR amplitudes is mandatory before directional estimations. In situ wind observations gathered by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration National Data Buoy Center (NOAA NDBC) are exploited for validation. The findings obtained from S-1 data confirm the ones from simulated patterns. The MS LG-Mod analysis performs better than each single-scale one in terms of both percentages of reliable directions and directional Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) values achieved. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

19 pages, 9260 KiB  
Article
Examination of the Daily Cycle Wind Vector Modes of Variability from the Constellation of Microwave Scatterometers and Radiometers
by Francis Joseph Turk, Svetla Hristova-Veleva and Donata Giglio
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(1), 141; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13010141 - 04 Jan 2021
Cited by 8 | Viewed by 2401
Abstract
Offshore of many coastal regions, the ocean surface wind varies in speed and direction throughout the day, owing to forcing from land/sea temperature differences and orographic effects. Far offshore, both diurnal and semidiurnal wind vector variability has been noted in the Tropical Atmosphere [...] Read more.
Offshore of many coastal regions, the ocean surface wind varies in speed and direction throughout the day, owing to forcing from land/sea temperature differences and orographic effects. Far offshore, both diurnal and semidiurnal wind vector variability has been noted in the Tropical Atmosphere Ocean-TRIangle Trans-Ocean buoy Network (TAO-TRITON) mooring data in the tropical Pacific Ocean. In this manuscript, the tropical diurnal wind variability is examined with microwave radiometer-derived winds from the Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission (TRMM) and the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM), merged with RapidScat and other scatterometer data. Since the relationship between wind speed and its zonal and meridional components is nonlinear, this manuscript describes an observationally based methodology to merge the radiometer and scatterometer-based wind estimates as a function of observation time, to generate a multi-year dataset of diurnal wind variability. Compared to TAO-TRITON mooring array data, the merged satellite-derived wind components fairly well replicate the semidiurnal zonal wind variability over the tropical Pacific but generally show more variability in the meridional wind components. The meridional component agrees with the associated mooring location data in some locations better than others, or it shows no clear dominant diurnal or semidiurnal mode. Similar discrepancies are noted between two forecast model reanalysis products. It is hypothesized that the discrepancies amongst the meridional winds are due to interactions between surface convergence and convective precipitation over tropical ocean basins. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Other

Jump to: Research

10 pages, 3673 KiB  
Technical Note
Gale Wind Speed Retrieval Algorithm Using Ku-Band Radar Data Onboard GPM Satellite
by Maria Panfilova and Vladimir Karaev
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(24), 6268; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14246268 - 10 Dec 2022
Viewed by 859
Abstract
An algorithm to retrieve the wind speed within a wide swath from the normalized radar cross section (NRCS) is developed for the data of Ku-band radar operating in scanning mode installed onboard the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite. NRCS at the nadir is [...] Read more.
An algorithm to retrieve the wind speed within a wide swath from the normalized radar cross section (NRCS) is developed for the data of Ku-band radar operating in scanning mode installed onboard the Global Precipitation Measurement (GPM) satellite. NRCS at the nadir is calculated within a wide swath and is used to obtain the wind speed. The scatterometer data are used to obtain the dependence between NRCS at the nadir and the wind speed for gale winds. The algorithm was validated also using the Advanced Scatterometer (ASCAT) data and revealed good accuracy. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

11 pages, 3260 KiB  
Technical Note
Characterization of Tropical Cyclone Intensity Using the HY-2B Scatterometer Wind Data
by Siqi Liu, Wenming Lin, Marcos Portabella and Zhixiong Wang
Remote Sens. 2022, 14(4), 1035; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs14041035 - 21 Feb 2022
Cited by 4 | Viewed by 1987
Abstract
The estimation of tropical cyclone (TC) intensity using Ku-band scatterometer data is challenging due to rain perturbation and signal saturation in the radar backscatter measurements. In this paper, an alternative approach to directly taking the maximum scatterometer-derived wind speed is proposed to assess [...] Read more.
The estimation of tropical cyclone (TC) intensity using Ku-band scatterometer data is challenging due to rain perturbation and signal saturation in the radar backscatter measurements. In this paper, an alternative approach to directly taking the maximum scatterometer-derived wind speed is proposed to assess the TC intensity. First, the TC center location is identified based on the unique characteristics of wind stress divergence/curl near the TC core. Then the radial extent of 17-m/s winds (i.e., R17) is calculated using the wind field data from the Haiyang-2B (HY-2B) scatterometer (HSCAT). The feasibility of HSCAT wind radii in determining TC intensity is evaluated using the maximum sustained wind speed (MSW) in the China Meteorological Administration best-track database. It shows that the HSCAT R17 value generally better correlates with the best-track MSW than the HSCAT maximum wind speed, therefore indicating the potential of using the HSCAT data to improve the TC nowcasting capabilities. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Figure 1

12 pages, 5628 KiB  
Technical Note
An Assessment of CyGNSS v3.0 Level 1 Observables over the Ocean
by Matthew Lee Hammond, Giuseppe Foti, Christine Gommenginger and Meric Srokosz
Remote Sens. 2021, 13(17), 3500; https://0-doi-org.brum.beds.ac.uk/10.3390/rs13173500 - 03 Sep 2021
Cited by 6 | Viewed by 2072
Abstract
Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) is a rapidly developing Earth observation technology that makes use of signals of opportunity from Global Navigation Satellite Systems that have been reflected off the Earth’s surface. The Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CyGNSS) is a constellation [...] Read more.
Global Navigation Satellite System Reflectometry (GNSS-R) is a rapidly developing Earth observation technology that makes use of signals of opportunity from Global Navigation Satellite Systems that have been reflected off the Earth’s surface. The Cyclone Global Navigation Satellite System (CyGNSS) is a constellation of eight small satellites launched by NASA in 2016, carrying dedicated GNSS-R payloads to measure ocean surface wind speed at low latitudes (±35° North/South). The ESA ECOLOGY project evaluated CyGNSS v3.0 products, which were recently released following various calibration updates. This paper examines the performance of the new calibration by evaluating CyGNSS v3.0 Level-1 Normalised Bistatic Radar Cross Section (NBRCS) and Leading Edge Slope (LES) data from individual CyGNSS units and different GPS transmitters under constant ocean wind conditions. Results indicate that L1 NBRCS from individual CyGNSS units are well inter-calibrated and remarkably stable over time, a significant improvement over previous versions of the products. However, prominent geographical biases reaching over 3 dB are found in NBRCS, linked to factors including the choice of GPS transmitter and the bistatic geometry. L1 LES shows similar anomalies as well as a secondary geographical pattern of biases. These findings provide a basis for further improvement of CyGNSS Level-2 wind products and have wider applicability to improving the calibration of GNSS-R sensors for the remote sensing of non-ocean Earth surfaces. Full article
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Remote Sensing of Ocean Surface Winds)
Show Figures

Graphical abstract

Back to TopTop